Isolation, Characterization and Biological Activities of Terpenoids from Gunnera Perpensa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Isolation, Characterization and Biological Activities of Terpenoids from Gunnera Perpensa Isolation, characterization and biological activities of terpenoids from Gunnera perpensa Submitted in fulfilment for the Degree of Master of Applied Sciences in Biotechnology in the Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa Fitsum K. Mammo SUPERVISOR: Dr Viresh Mohanlall CO- SUPERVISORS: Professor Francis O. Shode Professor Bharti Odhav REFERENCE DECLARATION I, Miss Fitsum K. Mammo (student number: 21449777) and Dr Viresh Mohanlall do hereby declare that in respect of the following dissertation: Title: Isolation, characterization and biological evaluation of terpenoids from Gunnera perpensa. 1. As far as we ascertain: a) no other similar dissertation exists; 2. All references as detailed in the dissertation are complete in terms of all personal communication engaged in and published works consulted. Signature of student Date Signature of supervisor Date Signature of co-supervisor Date Signature of co-supervisor Date DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my mother, Mrs. Aberash Zeleke Kuri and my late father, Mr. Kassa Mammo Abate, who instilled in me the virtues of perseverance and commitment to strive for excellence. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... i ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................... 1 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Aim ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.2. Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Gunnera perpensa ................................................................................................................ 4 1.2.1. Taxonomy and classification ......................................................................................... 6 1.2.2. Geographical Distribution ............................................................................................. 7 1.2.3. Ethnomedicinal uses ...................................................................................................... 9 1.2.4. Phytochemistry ............................................................................................................ 11 1.2.5. Pharmacology .............................................................................................................. 14 1.3. Plant secondary metabolites ............................................................................................... 16 1.3.1. Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites ........................................................................ 18 1.3.3. Terpenes....................................................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 2: EXTRACTION, ISOLATION AND STRUCTURAL ELUCIDATION OF SECONDARY METABOLITES FROM Gunnera perpensa ........................ 29 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 29 2.2. Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................... 32 2.2.1. Collection of plant material ......................................................................................... 32 2.2.2. Extraction..................................................................................................................... 32 2.2.3. Isolation and purification ............................................................................................. 35 2.3. Results ................................................................................................................................ 39 2.3.1. Extraction and isolation of secondary metabolites (Protocol 1) .................................. 39 2.3.2. Extraction and isolation of secondary metabolites (Protocol 2) .................................. 41 2.3.3. Structural elucidation of isolated compounds from the leaves .................................... 45 2.3.4. Structural elucidation of isolated compounds from the stalks ..................................... 47 1 2.4. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 55 CHAPTER 3: BIOLOGICAL SCREENING OF EXTRACTS AND SECONDARY METABOLITES OF Gunnera perpensa .............................................................. 58 3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 58 3.2. Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................... 62 3.2.1. Antimicrobial activity using agar disc diffusion assay ................................................ 62 3.2.2. Antimicrobial activity using bio-autography ............................................................... 63 3.2.2. Anti-sickling activity using Emmel’s test ................................................................... 64 3.2.3. Anti-oxidant activity using DPPH photometric assay ................................................. 65 3.2.4. Anticancer activity using MTT assay .......................................................................... 65 3.2.5. Toxicity evaluation using Brine shrimp assay ............................................................. 69 3.3. Results ................................................................................................................................ 70 3.3.1. Agar disc diffusion assay ............................................................................................. 70 3.3.2. Bio-autography assay .................................................................................................. 72 3.3.2. Anti-sickling, Emmel’s test ......................................................................................... 73 3.3.3. DPPH radical scavenging capacity .............................................................................. 75 3.3.4. MTT assay ................................................................................................................... 76 3.3.5. Biosafety assay ............................................................................................................ 77 3.4. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 79 CHAPTER 4: GENERAL CONCLUSION .................................................................................. 85 CHAPTER 5: REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 87 APPENDIX I .............................................................................................................................. 106 APPENDIX II: PUBLICATIONS .............................................................................................. 115 APPENDIX III: SUBMISSION ................................................................................................. 122 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my sincere thanks and gratitude to: • My supervisors, Dr V. Mohanlall, Prof. B. Odhav and Prof. F. O. Shode for their patience, guidance, constructive criticism and words of encouragement throughout the course of this project. • My mum, my sisters and my brother, for their support and encouragement. • My friends and colleagues, esp. Mr Kabange Kasumbwe, for their moral support and assistance. • Prof. H. Baijnath, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal for the collection of plant material. • Prof. M. Singh and Mr C. Grimmer, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal (UKZN), for their technical assistance. • Mr D. Tshibangu, University of Kinshasa, Department of chemistry, for his technical assistance. • National Research Foundation (NRF) for funding this project. i ABBREVIATIONS TLC Thin layer chromatography PTLC Preparative Thin-Layer Chromatography CC Column chromatography HPLC High-performance liquid chromatography NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance DEPT Distortionless enhancement by polarisation transfer DPPH 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide UV Ultra-violet MEP Methylerythritol Phosphate MVA Mevalonic acid IPP Isopentenyl pyrophosphate DMAPP Dimethylallyl pyrophosphate PCT Pentacyclic Triterpene OA Oleanolic acid UA Ursolic acid BA Betulinic acid MA Maslinic acid DCM Dichloromethane SiO2 Silica gel IR Infra-red MS Mass Spectrometry CDCl3 Deuterated chloroform DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide TMS Tetramethylsilane ii MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration ABTS 2,2’-azino-di [3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate] ORAC Oxygen radical absorbance
Recommended publications
  • Plants for a Future Species Database Bibliography
    Plants For A Future Species Database Bibliography Numbers in square brackets are the reference numbers that appear in the database. [K] Ken Fern Notes from observations, tasting etc at Plants For A Future and on field trips. [1] F. Chittendon. RHS Dictionary of Plants plus Supplement. 1956 Oxford University Press 1951 Comprehensive listing of species and how to grow them. Somewhat outdated, it has been replaces in 1992 by a new dictionary (see [200]). [1b] Food Plants International. http://foodplantsinternational.com/plants/ [1c] Natural Resources Conservation Service http://plants.usda.gov [1d] Invasive Species Compendium www.cabi.org [2] Hedrick. U. P. Sturtevant's Edible Plants of the World. Dover Publications 1972 ISBN 0-486-20459-6 Lots of entries, quite a lot of information in most entries and references. [3] Simmons. A. E. Growing Unusual Fruit. David and Charles 1972 ISBN 0-7153-5531-7 A very readable book with information on about 100 species that can be grown in Britain (some in greenhouses) and details on how to grow and use them. [4] Grieve. A Modern Herbal. Penguin 1984 ISBN 0-14-046-440-9 Not so modern (1930's?) but lots of information, mainly temperate plants. [5] Mabey. R. Food for Free. Collins 1974 ISBN 0-00-219060-5 Edible wild plants found in Britain. Fairly comprehensive, very few pictures and rather optimistic on the desirability of some of the plants. [6] Mabey. R. Plants with a Purpose. Fontana 1979 ISBN 0-00-635555-2 Details on some of the useful wild plants of Britain. Poor on pictures but otherwise very good.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)
    PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF DIPSACALES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SINADOXA AND TETRADOXA (ADOXACEAE) MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE,1 TORSTEN ERIKSSON,2 PATRICK A. REEVES,3 AND RICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 3 Abstract. To further clarify phylogenetic relationships within Dipsacales,we analyzed new and previously pub- lished rbcL sequences, alone and in combination with morphological data. We also examined relationships within Adoxaceae using rbcL and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We conclude from these analyses that Dipsacales comprise two major lineages:Adoxaceae and Caprifoliaceae (sensu Judd et al.,1994), which both contain elements of traditional Caprifoliaceae.Within Adoxaceae, the following relation- ships are strongly supported: (Viburnum (Sambucus (Sinadoxa (Tetradoxa, Adoxa)))). Combined analyses of C ap ri foliaceae yield the fo l l ow i n g : ( C ap ri folieae (Diervilleae (Linnaeeae (Morinaceae (Dipsacaceae (Triplostegia,Valerianaceae)))))). On the basis of these results we provide phylogenetic definitions for the names of several major clades. Within Adoxaceae, Adoxina refers to the clade including Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa, and Adoxa.This lineage is marked by herbaceous habit, reduction in the number of perianth parts,nectaries of mul- ticellular hairs on the perianth,and bifid stamens. The clade including Morinaceae,Valerianaceae, Triplostegia, and Dipsacaceae is here named Valerina. Probable synapomorphies include herbaceousness,presence of an epi- calyx (lost or modified in Valerianaceae), reduced endosperm,and distinctive chemistry, including production of monoterpenoids. The clade containing Valerina plus Linnaeeae we name Linnina. This lineage is distinguished by reduction to four (or fewer) stamens, by abortion of two of the three carpels,and possibly by supernumerary inflorescences bracts. Keywords: Adoxaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales, ITS, morphological characters, phylogeny, phylogenetic taxonomy, phylogenetic nomenclature, rbcL, Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipsacale Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales
    Amborellales Dipsacale Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales Acorales G G Eenzaadlobbigen Alismatales D Petrosaviales Pandanales w Dioscoreales D Liliales Asparagales o a Arecales Dasypogonales P Poales G Commeliniden G H Commelinales Zingiberales d ( Ceratophyllales A Chloranthales Z Gewone vlier D Canellales Piperales zijn, vormen het meest opvallen G Magnoliiden G Magnoliales tot sterk 2-zijdig symmetrisch, m Laurales Ranunculales Sabiales Proteales Trochodendrales Buxales Gunnerales Berberidopsidales Dilleniales Caryophyllales Santalales Saxifragales G Geavanceerde tweezaadlobbigen G Vitales Crossosomatales Geraniales Myrtales Zygophyllales Celastrales Malpighiales Gelderse roos G Fabiden G Oxalidales Fabales Rosales Cucurbitales Fagales Brassicales G G Malviden Malvales Sapindales Cornales Ericales G Asteriden G Garryales G Lamiiden G Gentianales Solanales Lamiales Aquifoliales G G Apiales Campanuliden Adoxaceae Dipsacales Caprifoliaceae 26 Asterales Dipsacales De orde Dipsacales is al vrij lang een goed omschreven groep, waarvan duidelijk is welke geslachten erin thuis horen. Dit wordt ondersteund door moleculaire kenmerken, namelijk overeenkomsten in de basenvolgorde van de ndhF-, rbcL-, atpB- en 18S-genen. Probleem is nog steeds de indeling in families. Hier is ervoor gekozen om slechts 2 families te onderscheiden: de Muskuskruidfamilie (Adoxaceae) en de Kamperfoeliefamilie (Caprifoliaceae). Alles bij elkaar telt deze orde ongeveer 1000 soorten. Ze komen voornamelijk op het Noordelijk Halfrond voor. Gewone vlier De tegenoverstaande bladeren, die vaak met elkaar verbonden zijn, vormen het meest opvallende kenmerk. De bloemen variëren van regelmatig en 5-tallig tot sterk 2-zijdig symmetrisch, met een kleiner aantal meeldraden en slechts 1 zaad per vrucht. Dipsacales I Mus The order Dipsacales has been a well-defined group for a long time, of De Mus which the composition is clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Program WELCOME
    THE SCOTT ARBORETUM OF SWARTHMORE COLLEGE www.scottarboretum.org 2019 Program WELCOME Welcome TABLE OF CONTENTS Greetings! Welcome to the 2019 Scott Arboretum Selections: Spring Sale. Download this handbook at scottarboretum.org. WELCOME 2 Schedule of the Sale 3 Special Offer Special Friends 4 10% discount on sales $100 and over, applies to plants only. Planting Container Grown Plants 10 Meaning of our Labels 12 Refund Policy Plant List 13 ALL SALES ARE FINAL; NO EXCHANGES OR REFUNDS. We are not able to offer refunds or exchanges since this is a special once-a- year event. Thank you! Many thanks to those volunteers who have contributed their efforts to this sale. A special thank you to Alan Kruza and Eve Thryum whose unwavering support and passion for the plants makes this sale possible. 2 SCHEDULE OF THE SALE Scott Arboretum Selections: Spring Sale Schedule: Friday, May 10 Special Friends Preview Party 5:30 to 7:30 pm To become a Special Friend to attend our Preview Party, call the Scott Arboretum Offices at 610- 328-8025. Saturday, May 11 Members Shopping 10 am – noon Members must show their membership card for early admission. If you have lost or misplaced your card, or would like to become a member, please call 610-328-8025. Open to the public – free noon – 3 pm 3 SPECIAL FRIENDS Julia and Vincent Auletta Our sincere appreciation to William D. Conwell Charles and Rosemary Philips these Special Friends of the Scott Laura Axel Arboretum Selections Sales, whose Harold Sweetman Alice Reilly support helps underwrite the cost of these vital fund-raising events.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoxaceae 1.3.3.8.1.A
    190 1.3.3.8.1. Adoxaceae 1.3.3.8.1.a. Características. ¾ Porte: hierbas delicadas perennes con olor a almizcle (Adoxa) o bien arbustos a pequeños árboles (Viburnum y Sambucus). ¾ Hojas: opuestas, simples o compuestas, pinnadas o trifoliadas, decusadas, con estípulas caedizas o sin estas, venación palmada a pinnadas, con pelos glandulares. ¾ Flores: gamopétalas, perfectas, generalmente en cimas plurifloras, a veces capitadas, entomófilas. ¾ Perianto: cáliz gamosépalo, en Adoxa con un hipanto cortamente prolongado, casi siempre 4-5 dentado. Corola generalmente 5, raro 3-4-mera, actinomorfas o zigomorfas, rotada o acampanada. ¾ Androceo: 3-5 estambres fijos al tubo corolino, anteras introrsas rara vez extrorsas (Sambucus). ¾ Gineceo: ovario ínfero o semiínfero, 2-5 carpelos y lóculos, con 1 óvulo péndulos; estilo filiforme corto; estigma lobulado. ¾ Fruto: drupa, baya o rara vez cápsula. ¾ Semilla: a menudo ruminada, endospermada; embrión pequeño. Sambucus australis c. Flor pistilada b. Flor estaminada a. Rama d. Corte longitudinal de flor pistilada g. corte longitudinal de semilla f. vista subapical de fruto Extraído de Bacigalupo, 1974 (Fl. Entre Ríos). e. Corte de transversal de ovario Diversidad Vegetal- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura (UNNE) CORE EUDICOTILEDÓNEAS- Asterídeas-Euasterídeas II: Dipsacales: Adoxaceae 191 1.3.3.8.1.b. Biología Floral. La polinización la llevan a cabo insectos (Izco, 1998). 1.3.3.8.1.c. Distribución y hábitat En la circunscripción actual la familia se encuentra más representada en las regiones templadas del hemisferio Norte (América y Asia), hallándose ausente en el Sahara, África tropical y del sur (Heywood, 1985). En el hemisferio sur se las encuentra principalmente en montañas tropicales (Stevens, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Saxifragaceae
    Flora of China 8: 269–452. 2001. SAXIFRAGACEAE 虎耳草科 hu er cao ke Pan Jintang (潘锦堂)1, Gu Cuizhi (谷粹芝 Ku Tsue-chih)2, Huang Shumei (黄淑美 Hwang Shu-mei)3, Wei Zhaofen (卫兆芬 Wei Chao-fen)4, Jin Shuying (靳淑英)5, Lu Lingdi (陆玲娣 Lu Ling-ti)6; Shinobu Akiyama7, Crinan Alexander8, Bruce Bartholomew9, James Cullen10, Richard J. Gornall11, Ulla-Maj Hultgård12, Hideaki Ohba13, Douglas E. Soltis14 Herbs or shrubs, rarely trees or vines. Leaves simple or compound, usually alternate or opposite, usually exstipulate. Flowers usually in cymes, panicles, or racemes, rarely solitary, usually bisexual, rarely unisexual, hypogynous or ± epigynous, rarely perigynous, usually biperianthial, rarely monochlamydeous, actinomorphic, rarely zygomorphic, 4- or 5(–10)-merous. Sepals sometimes petal-like. Petals usually free, sometimes absent. Stamens (4 or)5–10 or many; filaments free; anthers 2-loculed; staminodes often present. Carpels 2, rarely 3–5(–10), usually ± connate; ovary superior or semi-inferior to inferior, 2- or 3–5(–10)-loculed with axile placentation, or 1-loculed with parietal placentation, rarely with apical placentation; ovules usually many, 2- to many seriate, crassinucellate or tenuinucellate, sometimes with transitional forms; integument 1- or 2-seriate; styles free or ± connate. Fruit a capsule or berry, rarely a follicle or drupe. Seeds albuminous, rarely not so; albumen of cellular type, rarely of nuclear type; embryo small. About 80 genera and 1200 species: worldwide; 29 genera (two endemic), and 545 species (354 endemic, seven introduced) in China. During the past several years, cladistic analyses of morphological, chemical, and DNA data have made it clear that the recognition of the Saxifragaceae sensu lato (Engler, Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnera Herteri – Developmental Morphology of a Dwarf from Uruguay and S Brazil (Gunneraceae)
    Plant Syst. Evol. 248: 219–241 (2004) DOI 10.1007/s00606-004-0182-7 Gunnera herteri – developmental morphology of a dwarf from Uruguay and S Brazil (Gunneraceae) R. Rutishauser1, L. Wanntorp2, and E. Pfeifer1 1Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 2Department of Botany, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden Received January 26, 2004; accepted March 31, 2004 Published online: August 30, 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract. New morphological and developmental Key words: Gunnera, Ostenigunnera, Panke, Nostoc, observations are presented of Gunnera herteri axillary glands, basal eudicots, congenital fusion, (subgenus Ostenigunnera) which is, according to development, sympodial growth, unisexual flowers. molecular studies, sister to the other species of Gunnera. It is an annual dwarf (up to 4 cm long) whereas the other Gunnera spp. are perennial and slightly to extremely larger. External stem glands Developmental morphology of Gunnera herteri. are combined with channels into the stem cortex Gunnera is a genus of flowering plants that serving as entrance path for symbiotic Nostoc cells. includes 30–40 species with a mainly southern Young stem zones show globular regions of cyto- distribution. Schindler (1905) divided Gunnera plasm-rich cortex cells, prepared for invasion by into five subgenera based on the size of the Nostoc. The leaf axils contain 2–5 inconspicuous plants, their means of propagation and their colleters (glandular scales) which can be taken as geographical distribution. Mattfeld (1933) cre- homologous to the more prominent scales of ated the new subgenus Ostenigunnera to G. manicata (subg. Panke) and G. macrophylla include a new species of Gunnera, discovered (subg. Pseudogunnera).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant in the Spotlight
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety March / April 2010 Beautiful, Durable Baptisias Coniferous Groundcovers DynamicDynamic DuetsDuets Agaves for Small Spaces forfor ShadeShade contents Volume 89, Number 2 . March / April 2010 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM AHS Allan Armitage to host AHS webinar, River Farm Spring Garden Market in April, AHS National Children & Youth Garden Symposium goes to California, AHS to participate in 4th annual Washington, D.C.-area Garden Fest, 2010 AHS President’s Council Members Trip to Florida. 14 AHS NEWS SPECIAL 2010 Great American Gardeners National Award winners and 2010 Book Award winners. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… page 36 Steven Still: Herbaceous perennial expert. 44 HOMEGROWN HARVEST A bumper crop of broccoli. 18 DYNAMIC DUETS FOR SHADE BY KRIS WETHERBEE Light up shady areas of the garden by using plant combinations 46 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK that offer complementary textures and colors. Mt. Cuba Center releases coneflower evaluation results, AMERICAN BEAUTIES: study shows bumble bee 24 page 24 populations declining, BAPTISIAS BY RICHARD HAWKE GreatPlants® and Perennial The release of new cultivars of Plant Association name 2010 false indigo has renewed garden- Plants of the Year, Berry ers’ interest in the genus Baptisia. Botanic Garden to close, Jane Pepper retires as president of page 46 GROUND-COVERING Pennsylvania Horticultural 30 Society. CONIFERS BY PENELOPE O’SULLIVAN 50 GREEN GARAGE® Reduce maintenance and add Garden gloves. vibrant color and texture to the garden by using low-growing 52 BOOK REVIEWS conifers as groundcovers. What’s Wrong with My Plant? (And How Do I Fix It?); Homegrown Vegetables, Fruits, and Herbs; The Vegetable Gardener’s Bible; and 36 AGAVES FOR SMALL GARDENS BY MARY IRISH The Encyclopedia of Herbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lose the Plot: Cost-Effective Survey of the Peak Range, Central Queensland
    Lose the plot: cost-effective survey of the Peak Range, central Queensland. Don W. Butlera and Rod J. Fensham Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, Mt Coot-tha Botanic Gardens, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong, QLD, 4066 AUSTRALIA. aCorresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract: The Peak Range (22˚ 28’ S; 147˚ 53’ E) is an archipelago of rocky peaks set in grassy basalt rolling-plains, east of Clermont in central Queensland. This report describes the flora and vegetation based on surveys of 26 peaks. The survey recorded all plant species encountered on traverses of distinct habitat zones, which included the ‘matrix’ adjacent to each peak. The method involved effort comparable to a general flora survey but provided sufficient information to also describe floristic association among peaks, broad habitat types, and contrast vegetation on the peaks with the surrounding landscape matrix. The flora of the Peak Range includes at least 507 native vascular plant species, representing 84 plant families. Exotic species are relatively few, with 36 species recorded, but can be quite prominent in some situations. The most abundant exotic plants are the grass Melinis repens and the forb Bidens bipinnata. Plant distribution patterns among peaks suggest three primary groups related to position within the range and geology. The Peak Range makes a substantial contribution to the botanical diversity of its region and harbours several endemic plants among a flora clearly distinct from that of the surrounding terrain. The distinctiveness of the range’s flora is due to two habitat components: dry rainforest patches reliant upon fire protection afforded by cliffs and scree, and; rocky summits and hillsides supporting xeric shrublands.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Methods for Evaluating Efficacy of Ethnoveterinary Medicinal Plants
    Methods for 1 Evaluating Efficacy of Ethnoveterinary Medicinal Plants Lyndy J. McGaw and Jacobus N. Eloff CONTENTS 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................1 1.1.1 The Need for Evaluating Traditional Animal Treatments ....................2 1.2 Biological Activity Screening ...........................................................................4 1.2.1 Limitations of Laboratory Testing of EVM Remedies .........................6 1.2.2 Extract Preparation ...............................................................................7 1.2.3 Antibacterial and Antifungal ................................................................9 1.2.4 Antiviral ..............................................................................................12 1.2.5 Antiprotozoal and Antirickettsial ....................................................... 13 1.2.6 Anthelmintic ....................................................................................... 14 1.2.7 Antitick ...............................................................................................15 1.2.8 Antioxidant ......................................................................................... 16 1.2.9 Anti-inflammatory and Wound Healing ............................................. 17 1.3 Toxicity Studies .............................................................................................. 18 1.4 Conclusion .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Evaluation of South African Medicinal Plants Used for Treating Tuberculosis and Related Symptoms
    Pharmacological evaluation of South African medicinal plants used for treating tuberculosis and related symptoms By Balungile Madikizela Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg November, 2014 Form EX1-5 College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science Declaration 1 - Plagiarism I, Balungile Madikizela (209523515), declare that 1. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain other persons' writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed in italics and inside quotation marks, and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the thesis and in the References sections. Signed:……………………………….November, 2014 i Student Declaration Pharmacological evaluation of South
    [Show full text]