Ipv6 Deployment and Commercial Applications At

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ipv6 Deployment and Commercial Applications At About NTT NTT - A global IPv6 deployment case study Adoption considerations An Adoption how-to IPv6 beyond the transition Hikari-TV Earthquake warning service 2 AT&T 118.9 Verizon Communications 93.7 NTT* 93.5 Deutsche Telekom 85.5 Telefonica 77.2 France Telecom 72.4 Vodafone 71.2 China Mobile Communications 47.0 Telecom Italia 43.3 BT 42.2 Sprint Nextel 40.1 KDDI 31.4 Comcast 30.8 Vivendi 29.6 America Movil 28.5 China Telecommunications 27.8 Softbank 24.3 Korea Telecom 21.6 Telstra 18.8 Carso Global Telecom 17.9 Royal KPN 17.3 DirectTV Group 17.2 Source: Fortune Vol. 158, Mo.2, July 21, 2008 3 1996: NTT 1998: Verio 1999: NTT 2000: Verio 2001: NTT Com 2002: World 2003: NTT/VERIO Labs started begins Com begins obtains IPv6 pioneers Communications launches IPv6 one of the participation IPv6 sTLA from world’s first Association (WCA) Native, Tunneling, world’s in PAIX tunneling ARIN IPv6 awards NTT and Dual Stack largest global native IPv6 trial for connectivity Communications commercial IPv6 IX Japanese service on a with “Best service in North research customers commercial Technology America networks basis Foresight” for its IPv6 global products 2003: 2004: NTT 2004: NTT Com wins 2005: Dual stack 10/2006: 2/2007: Communications IPv6 Native the World Virtual Private Launched the Awarded Solutions and Dual Communications Server released. GSA Magazine names Stack Association “Best New NTT First ISP to offer Schedule 70 NTT/VERIO IPv6 services Service” award for an IPv6 managed available Communications contract for Gateway Services IPv6/IPv4 Global Dual firewall service “Product of the around the Service IPv6 Transition IPv6 IP transit Year” globe Consultancy 4/2008: 3/2008: NTT Com named Best Wholesale 5/2008: 1/2009: 1/2008: IDC names NTT Carrier at the Telecom Asia Awards European Commission NTT America NTT America America Top 20 IPv6 for Global IP Network Service and invites NTT America to demos IPv6 demos IPTV Influencer Working services incorporating IPv6 and speak at European IPv6 over IPv6 at at ICAC at with the U.S. advanced security technologies Day U.S. Senate ICAC at U.S. Government Senate 4 Approximately 14% of our customers purchase IPv6 transit. Over 47 Gbps of purchased IPv6 or dual stack capacity. January 2009 IPv6 Customer Breakdown Education & Government 6% Hardware & Manufacturing 19% Internet & Telecom 64% Webhosting & Web Services 11% Total 100% 5 About NTT NTT - A global IPv6 deployment case study Adoption considerations An Adoption how-to IPv6 beyond the transition Hikari-TV Earthquake warning service 6 All backbone equipment needs to be audited and upgraded if necessary: Chassis, cards, memory, etc. Operating systems What features will be offered and can the network support these features. How will deployment take place: Core first then the aggregation routers Both at the same time Set up an entire separate (parallel) network Use tunnels A test environment needs to be set up. (everything needs to be tested) 7 Router configuration tools. Route Registry. Address allocation database and procedures. DNS support. (records and access method) Customer interfaces. (looking glass, control panels, etc.) Access feature support: Access methods (TDM, Ethernet, Frame, etc.) Features (shadow, managed router, etc.) Consulting services Billing system support. 8 Network Monitoring. Troubleshooting tools. Training for NOC and IPeng personnel. SLA monitoring and display tools. Any other support and monitoring tools will need to be upgraded. 9 Collateral needs to be developed. Decide which verticals to target. PIQs need to be revamped for IPv6. Business partnerships (if needed) to support the product. 10 About NTT NTT - A global IPv6 deployment case study Adoption considerations An Adoption how-to IPv6 beyond the transition Hikari-TV Earthquake warning service 11 In 1996 NTT Labs started one of the world’s largest global IPv6 research networks. Equipment procurement: in 1997 started working with vendors for IPv6 support, and in 1999 started pushing hard for commercial support. In 1999 NTT obtained an sTLA from APNIC. (Asia) In 2000 an sTLA was obtained from ARIN. (N.A.) 6bone was used for testing initially - later a private IPv6 lab in Dallas was used. In 2000 IPv6 was officially on NTT Communications’ product road map. 12 NTT treated the deployment of IPv6 similar to launching a new product. Set up a core team representing all necessary groups Set up a project plan, document project requirements, design documents, test plans, etc. Deploy IPv6 in a phased approach: – (I) Precommercial Phase – (II) Commercial – (III) Follow up releases 13 In June of 2003, NTT Communications launched pre- commercial IPv6 service in the US. Native IPv6 was available in three locations: Bay Area Los Angeles Washington D.C. Area Cisco 7206 routers in these three locations running dual stack - tunneling across the backbone. (backbone not dual stack) Tunneling (RFC 2893 manually configured IPv6 over IPv4) available in all other POPs. (tunnel built to one of the locations above) 14 Pre-commercial service was offered from June 2003 to December 2003. (at which time commercial service was launched) Pre-commercial objectives: Bring on a small, manageable number of customers Test provisioning and support procedures Train NOC staff Continue JunOS/IOS IPv6 testing Develop internal tools Allowed time to upgrade backbone to dual stack Still just a few dual stack routers with tunneling across the backbone everywhere else. 15 NSPIXP6 JPNAP6 UK6X LINX PAIX EQUI6IX AMS-IX S. Korea UK Taiwan United States Netherlands Japan France Germany Hong Kong Spain Malaysia Australia IPv6 Native Service Availability IPv6 Tunneling Service Availability IPv6 Primary Exchange Point 16 In 4Q2003 global backbone was upgraded to dual stack. (Asia, Australia, North America, and Europe) In December, 2003, three types of IPv6 service were offered on a commercial basis: Native IPv6 (available at every POP) Manually configured IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling Dual stack IPv4/IPv6 AS2914 core completely dual stack. (globally) 7x24 NOC support and SLAs. Still service functionality gaps. 17 NSPIXP6 JPNAP6 UK6X LINX PAIX EQUI6IX AMS-IX DE-CIX S. Korea UK HK61X Taiwan United States Netherlands Japan France Germany Hong Kong Spain PARIX Malaysia Australia ESPANIX IPv6 Native Service Availability IPv6 Primary Exchange Point 18 Since the commercial launch in December 2003, follow up releases have been pushed out to fill functionality gaps. Added IPv6 support for: Off-net Tunneling Managed Router Service Shadow support for TDM and Ethernet Managed Firewall Dual stack Virtual Private Server Our goal and philosophy is to offer all features and services in IPv4 and IPv6. (It doesn’t matter which flavor of IP you buy - you can get the same things.) 19 IPv6/IPv4 Dual Stack Backbone has shown excellent performance with no critical problems so far. Core routers / routing protocols have had no problems handing IPv6 traffic. (in addition to the IPv4 traffic/routing) But still, we have some operational gaps: Stats tools are still lacking in the IPv6 environment (IPv6 MIB support, SNMP over IPv6 support…) IPv6 jitter measurement system compatible with our IPv4 system. 20 21 Create a core project team with representation from all pertinent groups in your organizations. Plan well in advance and make purchasing decisions based on IPv6 support. (NTT had no capital budget specifically for IPv6 deployment) Proper planning reduces cost and pain. Select the best backbone migration approach for your network - running IPv4/ IPv6 dual stack is recommended if possible. Set up a test environment and/or use existing test beds. Get training for engineering, provisioning, and support personnel. Employ a phased rollout approach Allows to continue testing Get internal resources trained and up to speed Solidify internal processes and tools Can fill in functionality gaps over time Make sure your security policy also includes IPv6 Get outside help if needed. IPv6 roll out should be easier today with the increased maturity of IPv6. 22 IPv6 Essentials (O’Reilly) by Silvia Hagen ISBN 0-596-10058-2 Chapter 10 includes case studies, including NTT’s. Global IPv6 Strategies (Cisco Press) by Patrick Grossetete, Ciprian P. Popoviciu, Fred Wettling IPv6 Security (Cisco Press) by Scott Hogg and Eric Vyncke 23 About NTT NTT - A global IPv6 deployment case study Adoption considerations An Adoption how-to IPv6 beyond the transition Hikari-TV Earthquake warning service 24 Hikari-TV Top Page ‘Hikari-TV’ Content Delivery Network PC / Internet NTT NGN Network aka ‘FLET’S Hikari Next’ FTTH Home (Closed IPv6 Network) Network Set Top Box or IP Phone Digital TV for ‘Hikari-TV’ 25 Digital terrestrial Tokyo: NHK General, NHK Education, Nippon Television, TV Asahi, TBS, TV Tokyo, Fuji TV, Tokyo MX, and Open University of Japan retransmission Osaka: NHK General, NHK Education, MBS, ABC, TV Osaka, KTV, and (High definition) Yomiuri TV Main broadcast Independently produced program (5 channels) channels (12) Shopping program (7 channels) Movie Sports Anime Music Basic channels Drama Hobby, culture (40) Entertainment Foreign language Documentary News, weather Movie, entertainment, and adult programming (23 channels) Premium channels (23) * A red-framed box indicates a high-definition channel. A blue underline indicates a popular overseas channel. * Main broadcast channels, basic channels, and premium channels use H.264 and MPEG-2 as the encoding formats. The H.264 bitrates are 8 Mbps for HD and 3.7 Mbps for SD. The MPEG-2 bitrates are 4.2 Mbps for HD and 2.5 Mbps for SD. 26 ‘Hikari-TV’ content delivery platform is based on IPTV standard specifications provided by ‘IPTV Forum Japan’ (www.iptvforum.jp, Japanese only) ‘Hikari-TV’ provides several types of Set Top Boxes (STB). TOSHIBA and SHARP provide Digital TVs that include the ‘Hikari-TV’ function. Broadband Button PM-700 ZH70000 & Z7000 for ‘Hikari-TV’ (Hikari-TV STB) (DTV, JAPAN MODEL) 27 NTT’s FLETS Hikari Next network (aka the NGN) is a closed IPv6 network.
Recommended publications
  • Accelerating Adoption of Ipv6
    Accelerating Adoption of IPv6 LUDVIG AHLINDER and ANDERS ERIKSSON KTH Information and Communication Technology Degree project in Communication Systems First level, 15.0 HEC Stockholm, Sweden Accelerating Adoption of IPv6 Ludvig Ahlinder and Anders Eriksson 2011.05.17 Mentor and Examiner: Prof. Gerald Q. Maguire Jr School of Information and Communications Technology Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden Abstract It has long been known that the number of unique IPv4-addresses would be exhausted because of the rapid expansion of the Internet and because countries such as China and India are becoming more and more connected to the rest of the world. IPv6 is a new version of the Internet Protocol which is supposed to succeed the old version, IPv4, in providing more addresses and new services. The biggest challenge of information and communication technology (ICT) today is to transition from IPv4 to IPv6. The purpose of this thesis is to accelerate the adoption of IPv6 by highlighting the benefits of it compared to IPv4. Although the need for more IP-addresses is the most urgent incentive for the transition to IPv6, other factors also exist. IPv6 offers many improvements to IPv4 which are necessary for the continued expansion of Internet-based applications and services. Some argue that we do not need to transition to IPv6 as the problems with IPv4, mainly the address- shortage, can be solved in other ways. One of the methods of doing this is by extending the use of Network Address Translators (NATs), but the majority of experts and specialists believe that NATs should not be seen as a long-term solution.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNET ADDRESSING: MEASURING DEPLOYMENT of Ipv6
    INTERNET ADDRESSING: MEASURING DEPLOYMENT OF IPv6 APRIL 2010 2 FOREWORD FOREWORD This report provides an overview of several indicators and data sets for measuring IPv6 deployment. This report was prepared by Ms. Karine Perset of the OECD‟s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. The Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy (CISP) recommended, at its meeting in December 2009, forwarding the document to the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP) for declassification. The ICCP Committee agreed to make the document publicly available in March 2010. Experts from the Internet Technical Advisory Committee to the ICCP Committee (ITAC) and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC) have provided comments, suggestions, and contributed significantly to the data in this report. Special thanks are to be given to Geoff Huston from APNIC and Leo Vegoda from ICANN on behalf of ITAC/the NRO, Patrick Grossetete from ArchRock, Martin Levy from Hurricane Electric, Google and the IPv6 Forum for providing data, analysis and comments for this report. This report was originally issued under the code DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)17/FINAL. Issued under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD member countries. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 in Mobile Networks APRICOT 2016 – February 2016
    IPv6 in Mobile Networks APRICOT 2016 – February 2016 Telstra Unrestricted Introduction Sunny Yeung - Senior Technology Specialist, Telstra Wireless Network Engineering Technical Lead for Wireless IPv6 deployment Wireless Mobile IP Edge/Core Architect Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 2 Agenda 1. Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? 2. IPv6 – it’s here. Really. 3. Wireless Network Architectures 4. 464XLAT – Saviour? Or the devil in disguise? 5. Solution Testing and Results 6. Conclusion 7. Q&A Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 3 Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? • Exponential Growth in mobile data traffic and user equipment • Network readiness for Internet-of-Things • IPv4 public address depletion • IPv4 private address depletion • Offload the NAT44 architecture • VoLTE/IMS Remember – IPv6 should be invisible to the end-user Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 5 IPv6 It’s Here. Really. IPv6 Global Traffic The world according to Google Source - https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 7 Carrier Examples SP1 SP2 / SP3 SP4 Dual-Stack SS+NAT64+DNS64+CLAT SS/DS+NAT64+DNS-HD +CLAT 1. Every carrier will have a unique set of circumstances that dictates which transition method they will use. There is no standard way of doing this. 2. You must determine which is the best method for your network. In any method, remember to ensure you have a long-term strategy for the eventual deployment of native Single Stack IPv6! Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 8 IPv4 reality – from a business perspective 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mobile Networks and Ipv6
    Evolution of Mobile Networks and IPv6 Miwa Fujii <[email protected]> APNIC, Senior Advisor Internet Development 25th April 2014 APEC TEL49 Yangzhou, China Issue Date: [25/04/2014] Revision: [3] Overview • Growth path of the Internet – Asia Pacific region • Evolution of mobile networks • IPv6 deployment in mobile networks: Case study • IPv6 deployment status update • IPv6 in mobile networks: way forward 2 Growth path of the Internet The next wave of Internet growth • The Internet has experienced phenomenal growth in the last 20 years – 16 million users in 1995 and 2.8 billion users in 2013 • And the Internet is still growing: Research indicates that by 2017, there will be about 3.6 billion Internet users – Over 40% of the world’s projected population (7.6 billion) • The next wave of Internet growth will have a much larger impact on the fundamental nature of the Internet – It is coming from mobile networks http://www.allaboutmarketresearch.com/internet.htm 4 Internet development in AP region: Internet users 100.00 Internet Users (per 100 inhabitants) New Zealand, 89.51 90.00 Canada, 86.77 Korea, 84.10 Australia, 82.35 80.00 United States, 81.03 Japan, 79.05 Chinese Taipei, 75.99 Singapore, 74.18 70.00 Hong Kong, China, 72.80 Malaysia, 65.80 Chile, 61.42 60.00 Brunei Darussalam, 60.27 Russia, 53.27 50.00 China, 42.30 Viet Nam, 39.49 40.00 Mexico, 38.42 Peru, 38.20 The Philippines, 36.24 30.00 Thailand, 26.50 20.00 Indonesia, 15.36 10.00 Papua New Guinea, 2.30 0.00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 http://statistics.apec.org/ 5 Internet
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Analysis of the Effects and the Mitigation of Ipv4 Address Exhaustion
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN FAKULTÄT FÜR ELEKTROTECHNIK UND INFORMATIK LEHRSTUHL FÜR INTELLIGENTE NETZE UND MANAGEMENT VERTEILTER SYSTEME Empirical Analysis of the Effects and the Mitigation of IPv4 Address Exhaustion vorgelegt von M.Sc. Philipp Richter geboren in Berlin von der Fakultät IV – Elektrotechnik und Informatik der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOKTOR DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN -DR. RER. NAT.- genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Möller, Technische Universität Berlin Gutachterin: Prof. Anja Feldmann, Ph.D., Technische Universität Berlin Gutachter: Prof. Vern Paxson, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley Gutachter: Prof. Steve Uhlig, Ph.D., Queen Mary University of London Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 2. August 2017 Berlin 2017 Abstract IP addresses are essential resources for communication over the Internet. In IP version 4, an address is represented by 32 bits in the IPv4 header; hence there is a finite pool of roughly 4B addresses available. The Internet now faces a fundamental resource scarcity problem: The exhaustion of the available IPv4 address space. In 2011, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) depleted its pool of available IPv4 addresses. IPv4 scarcity is now reality. In the subsequent years, IPv4 address scarcity has started to put substantial economic pressure on the networks that form the Internet. The pools of available IPv4 addresses are mostly depleted and today network operators have to find new ways to satisfy their ongoing demand for IPv4 addresses. Mitigating IPv4 scarcity is not optional, but mandatory: Networks facing address shortage have to take action in order to be able to accommodate additional subscribers and customers. Thus, if not confronted, IPv4 scarcity has the potential to hinder further growth of the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Program (PDF)
    ヴ ィ ボー ・ ア ニ メー シ カ ョ ワ ン イ フ イ ェ と ス エ ピ テ ッ ィ Viborg クー バ AnimAtion FestivAl ル Kawaii & epikku 25.09.2017 - 01.10.2017 summAry 目次 5 welcome to VAF 2017 6 DenmArk meets JApAn! 34 progrAmme 8 eVents Films For chilDren 40 kAwAii & epikku 8 AnD families Viborg mAngA AnD Anime museum 40 JApAnese Films 12 open workshop: origAmi 42 internAtionAl Films lecture by hAns DybkJær About 12 important ticket information origAmi 43 speciAl progrAmmes Fotorama: 13 origAmi - creAte your own VAF Dog! 44 short Films • It is only possible to order tickets for the VAF screenings via the website 15 eVents At Viborg librAry www.fotorama.dk. 46 • In order to pick up a ticket at the Fotorama ticket booth, a prior reservation Films For ADults must be made. 16 VimApp - light up Viborg! • It is only possible to pick up a reserved ticket on the actual day the movie is 46 JApAnese Films screened. 18 solAr Walk • A reserved ticket must be picked up 20 minutes before the movie starts at 50 speciAl progrAmmes the latest. If not picked up 20 minutes before the start of the movie, your 20 immersion gAme expo ticket order will be annulled. Therefore, we recommended that you arrive at 51 JApAnese short Films the movie theater in good time. 22 expAnDeD AnimAtion • There is a reservation fee of 5 kr. per order. 52 JApAnese short Film progrAmmes • If you do not wish to pay a reservation fee, report to the ticket booth 1 24 mAngA Artist bAttle hour before your desired movie starts and receive tickets (IF there are any 56 internAtionAl Films text authors available.) VAF sum up: exhibitions in Jane Lyngbye Hvid Jensen • If you wish to see a movie that is fully booked, please contact the Fotorama 25 57 Katrine P.
    [Show full text]
  • IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on Ipv6 'Understanding the Commercial And
    Fall 08 IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 ‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment’ Editor Wim Degezelle January 2017 IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 ‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment’ Table of contents Table of contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of Terms ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction & Background ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. About the IGF & BPFs ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Scope and Goal of the 2016 BPF ................................................................................................................. 7 2. Why deploy IPv6? ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. The Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Why Adopt IPv6?
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 Deployment – Ipv4 Lifetime Exhaustion Sooner Than Expected?
    IPv6 Deployment – IPv4 lifetime Exhaustion sooner than expected? Tony Hain Cisco Systems - Technical Leader IPv6 Forum Fellow [email protected] Session Number Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Distribution of IPv4 addresses by /8 Central 93 ARIN 23 RIPE NCC 19 APNIC 16 LACNIC 4 AfriNIC 1 Defined 4 Multicast 16 Experimental 16 IANA - Pool 25% remaining 64 0 102030405060708090100 IANA allocated 22 /8’s between Jan. 1, 2004 and Jul. 1, 2005 Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 222 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA 7 6 5 IANA Allocations to RIR's 4 Raw /8 allocations per month 3 2 1 Presentation_ID 0 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 333 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA IANA Allocations to RIR's Sliding-window 6 month geo-mean scale normalized to current 1 per month 2.50000 2.00000 1.50000 1.00000 0.50000 0.00000 Sep-95 Sep-96 Sep-97 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-00 Sep-01 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 444 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA 2.75 3 2.5 2.25 IANA Allocations to RIR's 1.75 2 Sliding-window 12 month average 1.5 1.25 0.75 1 0.5 0.25 0 Presentation_ID Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6-Only Deployment in Broadband and Cellular Networks Ipv4 As-A-Service
    IPv6-only Deployment in Broadband and Cellular Networks IPv4 as-a-Service LACNIC31 May, 2019 Punta Cana, DO @JordiPalet ([email protected]) - 1 Transition / Co-Existence Techniques • IPv6 has been designed for easing the transition and coexistence with IPv4 • Several strategies have been designed and implemented for coexisting with IPv4 hosts, grouped in three categories: – Dual stack: Simultaneous support for both IPv4 and IPv6 stacks – Tunnels: IPv6 packets encapsulated in IPv4 ones • This has been the commonest choice • Today expect IPv4 packets in IPv6 ones! – Translation: Communication of IPv4-only and IPv6- only. Initially discouraged and only “last resort” (imperfect). Today no other choice! • Expect to use them in combination! - 2 Dual-Stack Approach • When adding IPv6 to a system, do not delete IPv4 – This multi-protocol approach is familiar and well-understood (e.g., for AppleTalk, IPX, etc.) – In the majority of the cases, IPv6 is be bundled with all the OS release, not an extra-cost add-on • Applications (or libraries) choose IP version to use – when initiating, based on DNS response: • if (dest has AAAA record) use IPv6, else use IPv4 – when responding, based on version of initiating packet • This allows indefinite co-existence of IPv4 and IPv6, and gradual app-by-app upgrades to IPv6 usage • A6 record is experimental - 3 Dual-Stack Approach IPv6 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 Application Application Application Application TCP/UDP TCP/UDP TCP/UDP IPv6 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 IPv6-only stack Dual-stack (IPv4 & IPv6) IPv4-only stack IPv6
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of Ipv6
    Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks NIST Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 December 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Dr. Patrick D. Gallagher, Director GUIDELINES FOR THE SECURE DEPLOYMENT OF IPV6 Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-119 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-119, 188 pages (Dec. 2010) Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Stamp Collection Event
    STAMP COLLECTION EVENT park of the ① Collect 4 stamps or more ② Answer a simple questionnaire at booth S-1/S-2 ③ Participate in a lottery wheel to win prizes! lawn n the ot o refo ba alk W - 1 2・1 3・1 4 w ! ! W-3 t’s d friends Tokyo Le ily an Collect 4 stamps Eat F-2 Washoku Communicate Fukushima Feel Feel W-20 Shinjuku city r fam Broadcasting you or more to get prize Instant Photo Studio ith System Television, Inc w for participation ① ② ③ ④ Project: Connecting and Supporting Forests, Countryside, Rivers, and Sea Buy Enjoy Prize for participation Take a photo Do coloring Sat. Sun. “ Washoku” menu “Shinjuku no Mori” 10:00 -16:00 「Fudegaki」(fruit) 10/5 6 GTF REIWA 1,000 person a day Grand Green Tea Ceremony first-come Hosted By GTF Greater Tokyo Festival Committee first-served basis. Co-Hosted By Ministry of the Environment Nature Conservation Bureau / Ministry of the Environment Fukushima Regional Environmental Office / Japan Committee for UNDB / Shinjuku City / TOKYO FM / Tokyo Broadcasting System Television, Inc. / ⑤ ⑥ Tokyo Metropolitan Television Broadcasting Corp. W - 2 3・2 4 W-22 All Nippon Airways Ice Breaker SHIRASE Join Quiz Quiz Feel Stage Co., Ltd. Stage MC:Marie Takahashi Time Schedule 1 3 12 20 1 3 12 20 1 3 12 13 20 1 8 19 20 Collect 12 small stamps (Sat.) (Sun.) List of 10:30 5 10:30 6 performers to receive a special stamp 1 Opening Ceremony 11 Opening Ceremony , ⑦ ⑧ Hosts, Co-hosts, Makoto, DANCE KID S (Jazz Dance) at booth S-1 Maya Hayashi, Saki Nakajima, 10:45 BEYOOOOONS, BlueEarthProject 10:40 12 Opening Makoto Saki Nakajima
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Ipv4 Markets on Ipv6 Deployment
    Andrew Dul [email protected] The money underlies much of what we do When we push against the economics we are pushing up hill…which is hard Since “the beginning of the Internet” allocations have been based on need Over time this process was formalized into RFCs and later into RIR policies The RIRs saw the need to for allowing transfers of IPv4 addresses after exhaustion Transfer policies were created to allow economics to effect transfers Pros ◦ Allows economic factors to bring IPv4 addresses to the right place in the market place ◦ Increases the economic cost of IPv4 potentially forcing users to consider IPv6 Cons ◦ Potentially delays (or maybe deters) the adoption of IPv6 ◦ Deaggregation creates more routing table entries from larger blocks being “chopped up” to sell or lease Large known transaction from Nortel Bankruptcy to Microsoft in 2011 ◦ 667k IPv4 addresses for $7.5 million USD $11.25 USD per IPv4 address Other small transactions have occurred Address brokers are forming ◦ http://tradeipv4.com/ ◦ http://ipv4ex.com/ ◦ ARIN has a listing service 300,000 RIR Allocations to organizations Thousands 250,000 200,000 LACNIC RIPENCC 150,000 ARIN APNIC 100,000 AfriNIC 50,000 /32 IPv4AddressRIR Assignments and Allocations 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Current demand exceeds 250 million addresses per year $70,000 Billions $60,000 IPv4 Allocations vs. World GDP y = 180693x + 2E+13 $50,000 R² = 0.925 $40,000 y = 0.0007x2 - 6289x + 3E+13 $30,000 R² = 0.9432 $20,000 WorldGDP(CurrentUSD)
    [Show full text]