DOCSLIB.ORG

Variability of Blowfly Head Optomotor Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Variability of Blowfly Head Optomotor Responses 1170 The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1170-1184 Published by The Company of Biologists 2009 doi:10.1242/jeb.027060 Variability of blowfly head optomotor responses R. Rosner1,2,*, M. Egelhaaf1, J. Grewe3 and A. K. Warzecha1,2 1Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany, 2Psychologisches Institut II, Westfälische Wilhelms- Universität Münster, Münster, Germany and 3Abteilung Biologie II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 3 February 2009 SUMMARY Behavioural responses of an animal are variable even when the animal experiences the same sensory input several times. This variability can arise from stochastic processes inherent to the nervous system. Also, the internal state of an animal may influence a particular behavioural response. In the present study, we analyse the variability of visually induced head pitch responses of tethered blowflies by high-speed cinematography. We found these optomotor responses to be highly variable in amplitude. Most of the variability can be attributed to two different internal states of the flies with high and low optomotor gain, respectively. Even within a given activity state, there is some variability of head optomotor responses. The amount of this variability differs for the two optomotor gain states. Moreover, these two activity states can be distinguished on a fine timescale and without visual stimulation, on the basis of the occurrence of peculiar head jitter movements. Head jitter goes along with high gain optomotor responses and haltere oscillations. Halteres are evolutionary transformed hindwings that oscillate when blowflies walk or fly. Their main function is to serve as equilibrium organs by detecting Coriolis forces and to mediate gaze stabilisation. However, their basic oscillating activity was also suggested to provide a gain-modulating signal. Our experiments demonstrate that halteres are not necessary for high gain head pitch to occur. Nevertheless, we find the halteres to be responsible for one component of head jitter movements. This component may be the inevitable consequence of their function as equilibrium and gaze-stabilising organs. Key words: optomotor response, variability, behavioural state, halteres, head movements, arousal state. INTRODUCTION involved in producing a particular behavioural activity. In The nervous system of an animal enables it to adjust itself to combination with an electrophysiological accessibility of neurones environmental changes by producing different behavioural activities. at several processing stages, insects provide the opportunity to A particular behavioural activity can change in amplitude depending unravel general mechanisms of neuronal information processing. on the stimulus strength. In addition, when experiencing the exact Flies, despite their small brains, are capable of executing virtuosic same stimulus repeatedly, an animal does not respond in the same flight manoeuvres, requiring that the sensory information is reliably way each time. Several noise sources arising at different levels of processed and transformed into motor behaviour (Egelhaaf and a neuronal pathway can, in principle, cause this variability, e.g. Borst, 1993; Frye and Dickinson, 2001; Hengstenberg, 1993; sensory noise such as the phototransduction process in Schilstra and van Hateren, 1998). The variability of visual photoreceptors (Rodieck, 1998), synaptic noise due to the information processing in the nervous system of flies was the subject probabilistic nature of quantal transmitter release, as well as of many studies in the last few years (Borst and Theunissen, 1999; electrical noise introduced by the stochasticity of the opening and Egelhaaf and Warzecha, 1999; Egelhaaf et al., 2005; Grewe et al., closing of ion channels (Faisal et al., 2008; Johnston and Wu, 1995). 2003; Grewe et al., 2007; Haag and Borst, 1997; Juusola et al., 1994; Moreover, behavioural responses may depend on the animal’s Ruyter van Steveninck and Laughlin, 1996; Ruyter van Steveninck internal state. For instance, a car driver, being in a hurry, will et al., 2001; Warzecha and Egelhaaf, 1999; Warzecha and Egelhaaf, possibly undergo a hazardous overtaking manoeuvre that the same 2001; Warzecha et al., 1998; Warzecha et al., 2000). Compared with person facing the same situation yet being in a relaxed mood would the detailed characterisation of the variability of the neuronal not. There are several possibly less spectacular but nevertheless responses in the fly’s visual motion pathway, relatively little is interesting examples of behavioural gain changes subject to the known about the consequences of this variability for behavioural animal’s behavioural state. For example, when hearing a male’s performance. Turning responses induced by large-field visual calling song, female crickets will increase the gain of auditory motion stimuli during tethered flight are highly variable compared steering responses within the next 2–5s (Poulet and Hedwig, 2005). with the variability of motion-sensitive inter-neurones providing the In addition, locomotion versus resting represent behavioural states, visual input to the flight motor (Warzecha and Egelhaaf, 1996). i.e. whether an animal is actively moving or not was found to affect Moreover, flies occasionally omit turning manoeuvres towards an signal processing in nervous systems as well as the gain of object (Zanker et al., 1991), although response failures have not behavioural responses (Gilbert and Bauer, 1998; Heide, 1983; been observed at the level of the respective motion-sensitive Hengstenberg et al., 1986; Horn and Lang, 1978; Nolen and Hoy, neurones mediating object fixation (Egelhaaf, 1985). Response 1984; Reichert et al., 1985; Sillar and Roberts, 1988; Staudacher failures at the behavioural level indicate the action of some kind of and Schildberger, 1998). Many of these studies were carried out on gate downstream to the visual system that introduces variability of insects because of their relatively small number of neurones the motor output. THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY Variability of fly optomotor responses 1171 In the present study, we investigate the variability of optomotor markers on the fly’s head were painted on the eye (Fig.1); however, head movements of blowflies, which counteract retinal image slip this did not constrain the visual stimulation. The visual stimulus and are likely to play a role in stabilising the gaze (Hengstenberg, was applied to the frontal visual field of the fly, while the markers 1984; Hengstenberg, 1991; Hengstenberg, 1993; Hengstenberg et covered a small area responsible for acquiring caudo–lateral visual al., 1986; van Hateren and Schilstra, 1999). Visually induced head input. movements may be more reliable than yaw torque responses We evaluated data of four flies that were filmed ventrally because they fine tune gaze-stabilising body movements. In certain (Figs10–13) and 11 flies that were filmed laterally (Figs3–9, 14). phases of free flight, the fly’s head is more stable than its thorax We filmed ventrally when it was necessary to detect movements of (van Hateren and Schilstra, 1999). We monitored the head both halteres, and we filmed laterally when it was more important movements of tethered flies with high-speed cinematography while to resolve head pitch angles as well as haltere oscillation frequencies the animals were stimulated with visual motion. We found that the of the one haltere that could be monitored in this way. The pitch amplitude of optomotor head pitch responses are highly variable responses of three or two of the flies filmed laterally were analysed and that part of this variability can be attributed to two different before and after removing or immobilising the halteres, respectively states of behavioural activity that differ in optomotor gain. However, (example experiment in Fig.14). not only does variability across behavioural states exist but it also exists within a given state. The variability of the optomotor response Visual simulation amplitude is much higher in the high gain state than in the low gain The fly was positioned in front of a CRT-Monitor (Vision Research state. Nevertheless, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the high gain Graphics, Durham, NH, USA) with a frame rate of 240Hz and a state is not smaller than the ratio in the low gain state because of resolution of 640ϫ480pixels. In the screen centre, one pixel was the larger optomotor response amplitude in the high gain state. 0.18ϫ0.18deg. in size as seen by the fly. The whole screen was For fly head movements, a particularly unique mechanism of gain used to present the visual stimulus, spanning an elevation from control was proposed. Halteres, the evolutionary transformed –25deg. (ventral) to +45deg. (dorsal) and an azimuth from –45deg. hindwings of dipterans, were suggested to provide a gain-modulating to +45deg. with respect to a straight head position of the fly (0deg., signal (Gilbert and Bauer, 1998; Huston, 2005; Sandeman, 1980). 0deg.). The stimulus was programmed and presented utilising the The main function of the halteres is to serve as an equilibrium and Visage stimulus generator (Cambridge Research Systems, gaze-stabilising organ when the fly moves around (Dickinson, 1999; Cambridge, UK), Matlab (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) Nalbach and Hengstenberg, 1994; Pringle, 1948). They oscillate and a standard PC. when the fly walks or flies (Sandeman and Markl, 1980).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SHOO FLY! Houseflies, Those Pesky Flying Insects That Show up Uninvited
    SHOO FLY! Houseflies, those pesky flying insects that show up uninvited at your summer picnic or slip into your house if you leave a door open too long, are so annoying. Sometimes it seems that they are everywhere! Did you know that there are more than 100,000 different kinds of flies? The housefly is frequently found around humans and on farms and ranches that raise animals. Flies are pests. Not only are they annoying, they also spread diseases to humans. Flies eat rotten things like dead animals, feces (poop), and garbage. As they crawl around on that stuff they pick up germs and spread them wherever they land. Flies are decomposers, living things (such as bacteria, fungus, or insect) that feed on and break down plant and animal matter into simpler parts. Decomposers act as a clean up crew and perform an important job, making sure all of that plant and animal matter doesn’t pile up. Fly Facts: Instead of having a skeleton inside their bodies, flies are hard on the outside and soft on the inside. Their type of skeleton is called an exoskeleton. Flies eat only liquid food. If they land on solid food, they spit on it through their proboscis (part of their mouth). This softens the food so they can eat it. A fly’s tongue is shaped like a straw to sip their food. Since they eat only liquids, flies poop a lot. It is thought that they poop every time they land, so they leave poop everywhere! Flies are very hard to swat because of their excellent eyesight, fast reaction time, and agility (the ability to move quickly and easily).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitos Fail at Flight in Heavy Fog 19 November 2012
    Mosquitos fail at flight in heavy fog 19 November 2012 Mosquitos have the remarkable ability to fly in clear These halteres are on a comparable size to the fog skies as well as in rain, shrugging off impacts from droplets and they flap approximately 400 times raindrops more than 50 times their body mass. But each second, striking thousands of drops per just like modern aircraft, mosquitos also are second. Though the halteres can normally repel grounded when the fog thickens. Researchers from water, repeated collisions with 5-micron fog the Georgia Institute of Technology present their particles hinders flight control, leading to flight findings at the 65th meeting of the American failure. Physical Society's (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics, Nov. 18 - 20, in San Diego, Calif. "Thus the halteres cannot sense their position correctly and malfunction, similarly to how "Raindrop and fog impacts affect mosquitoes quite windshield wipers fail to work well when the rain is differently," said Georgia Tech researcher Andrew very heavy or if there is snow on the windshield," Dickerson. "From a mosquito's perspective, a said Dickerson. "This study shows us that insect falling raindrop is like us being struck by a small flight is similar to human flight in aircraft in that flight car. A fog particle – weighing 20 million times less is not possible when the insects cannot sense their than a mosquito – is like being struck by a crumb. surroundings." For humans, visibility hinders flight; Thus, fog is to a mosquito as rain is to a human." whereas for insects it is their gyroscopic flight sensors." On average during a rainstorm, mosquitos get struck by a drop once every 20 seconds, but fog More information: The talk, "Mosquito Flight particles surround the mosquito continuously as it Failure in Heavy Fog," is at 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Order ID: Diptera (Flies, Gnats, Midges, Mosquitoes, Maggots)
    Return to insect order home Page 1 of 3 Visit us on the Web: www.gardeninghelp.org Insect Order ID: Diptera (Flies, Gnats, Midges, Mosquitoes, Maggots) Life Cycle–Complete metamorphosis: Adults lay eggs. Eggs hatch into larvae (maggots, wigglers, etc.). Larvae eat, grow and molt. This stage is repeated a varying number of times, depending on species, until hormonal changes cause larvae to pupate. Inside the pupal case the pupae change in form and in color and develop wings. The emerging adults look completely different from the larvae. Adults–All (except a few wingless species) have only one pair of membranous wings, thus the name Diptera meaning "two wings". The forewings are fully developed and functional, while the hindwings are reduced to knobbed clubs called halteres, which are difficult to see without magnification except for larger specimens (e.g., crane flies). They are the best fliers in the insect world and possibly beyond: they can hover, fly backwards and upside-down and turn on the spot. Their eyes are usually large and multi-faceted, with males usually having larger eyes than females. Although many mimic bees and wasps, none have stingers. The order Diptera comprises two main suborders: long-horned (Nematocera) and short-horned Brachycera). Nematocera have long legs, long antennae and look fragile (e.g., mosquitoes, gnats, and midges, etc.) while Brachycera have stout bodies and short, stout antennae (e.g., horse flies, house flies, robber flies, hover flies, etc.). (Click images to enlarge or orange text for more information.) One pair of wings One pair of halteres Large, multifaceted eyes Robust-looking Short, stubby antennae Fragile-looking Many species are tiny Brachycera (Brachycera) Nematocera (Nematocera) Return to insect order home Page 2 of 3 Eggs–Adults lay eggs, usually where larval food is plentiful.
    [Show full text]
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex
    4100 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 22, 2019 • 39(21):4100–4112 Systems/Circuits Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex X Nicholas D. Kathman and XJessica L. Fox Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 The reduced hindwings of flies, known as halteres, are specialized mechanosensory organs that detect body rotations during flight. Primary afferents of the haltere encode its oscillation frequency linearly over a wide bandwidth and with precise phase-dependent spiking. However, it is not currently known whether information from haltere primary afferent neurons is sent to higher brain centers where sensory information about body position could be used in decision making, or whether precise spike timing is useful beyond the peripheral circuits that drive wing movements. We show that in cells in the central brain, the timing and rates of neural spiking can be modulatedbysensoryinputfromexperimentalhalteremovements(drivenbyaservomotor).Usingmultichannelextracellularrecording in restrained flesh flies (Sarcophaga bullata of both sexes), we examined responses of central complex cells to a range of haltere oscillation frequencies alone, and in combination with visual motion speeds and directions. Haltere-responsive units fell into multiple response classes, including those responding to any haltere motion and others with firing rates linearly related to the haltere frequency. Cells with multisensory responses showed higher firing rates than the sum of the unisensory responses at higher haltere frequencies. They also maintained visual properties, such as directional selectivity, while increasing response gain nonlinearly with haltere frequency. Although haltere inputs have been described extensively in the context of rapid locomotion control, we find haltere sensory information in a brain region known to be involved in slower, higher-order behaviors, such as navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical Basis of Wing and Haltere Coordination in Flies
    Biomechanical basis of wing and haltere coordination in flies Tanvi Deora, Amit Kumar Singh, and Sanjay P. Sane1 National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India Edited by M. A. R. Koehl, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved December 16, 2014 (received for review June 30, 2014) The spectacular success and diversification of insects rests critically unclear, especially in its ability to mediate rapid wing movement. on two major evolutionary adaptations. First, the evolution of flight, Moreover, faster wing movements require rapid sensory motor which enhanced the ability of insects to colonize novel ecological integration by the insect nervous system. The hind wings of habitats, evade predators, or hunt prey; and second, the miniatur- Diptera have evolved into a pair of mechanosensory halteres that ization of their body size, which profoundly influenced all aspects of detect gyroscopic forces during flight (10–13). The rapid feed- their biology from development to behavior. However, miniaturi- back from halteres is essential for flies to sense and control self- zation imposes steep demands on the flight system because smaller rotations during complex aerobatic maneuvers (13–15). In the insects must flap their wings at higher frequencies to generate majority of flies, the bilateral wings move in-phase, whereas sufficient aerodynamic forces to stay aloft; it also poses challenges halteres move antiphase relative to the wings. This relative co- to the sensorimotor system because precise control of wing ordination between wings and halteres is extremely precise even kinematics and body trajectories requires fast sensory feedback. at frequencies far exceeding 100 Hz.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 12-17: Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola – Diptera Overview. Chapt. 12-17. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. 12-17-1 Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 12-17 TERRESTRIAL INSECTS: HOLOMETABOLA – DIPTERA BIOLOGY AND HABITATS TABLE OF CONTENTS Diptera Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 12-17-2 Role of Bryophytes ................................................................................................................................. 12-17-3 Collection and Extraction Methods ......................................................................................................... 12-17-6 Fly Dispersal of Spores ........................................................................................................................... 12-17-8 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................................ 12-17-13 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................... 12-17-13 Forests ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Halteres for the Micromechanical Flying Insect ∗
    Halteres for the Micromechanical Flying Insect ¤ W.C. Wu R.J. Wood R.S. Fearing Department of EECS, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 fwcwu, rjwood, [email protected] Abstract MFI. On the other hand, piezoelectric vibrating struc- tures have been developed and have proven to be able The mechanism which real flying insects use to de- to detect Coriolis force with high accuracy [8]. There- tect body rotation has been simulated. The results show fore, based on the gyroscopic sensing of real flies, a that an angular rate sensor can be made based on such novel design using piezoelectric devices is being con- a biological mechanism. Two types of biomimetic gy- sidered. This paper describes the simulations and fab- roscopes have been constructed using foils of stainless rication of this type of biologically inspired angular steel. The ¯rst device is connected directly to a com- rate sensor for use on the MFI. pliant cantilever. The second device is placed on a mechanically amplifying fourbar structure. Both de- 2 Haltere Morphology vices are driven by piezoelectric actuators and detect the Coriolis force using strain gages. The experimental Research on insect flight revealed that in order to results show successful measurements of angular veloc- maintain stable flight, insects use structures, called ities and these devices have the bene¯ts of low power halteres, to detect body rotations via gyroscopic forces and high sensitivity. [5]. The halteres of a fly evolved from hindwings and are hidden in the space between thorax and abdomen 1 Introduction so that air current has negligible e®ect on them (see ¯gure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • HALTERE MEDIATED FLIGHT STABILIZATION in DIPTERA: RATE DECOUPLING, SENSORY ENCODING, and CONTROL REALIZATION by Rhoe A. Thompson August 2009 Chair: Dr
    HALTERE MEDIATED FLIGHT STABILIZATION IN DIPTERA: RATE DECOUPLING, SENSORY ENCODING, AND CONTROL REALIZATION By RHOE A. THOMPSON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 °c 2009 Rhoe A. Thompson 2 I dedicate this work to my wife, Ann, and children, Ryan, Rachel, and Jessica. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my committee chair, Dr. Warren Dixon, for his timely words of encouragement and the example he has provided. His passion for his work and professionalism have been a motivational factor in the success of all of his students. I would also like to acknowledge the other members of my committee, Dr. Carl Crane, Dr. Norman Fitz-Coy, Dr. Daniel Hahn, Mr. Ric Wehling and Mr. Johnny Evers for taking the time to review my work and for providing insightful suggestions for improvement. I would like to acknowledge the many distinguished professors I have learned from over the years at the University of Florida, one of the most memorable being the late Prof. Knox Millsaps. To the dismay of some students, Prof. Millsaps would at times spend much of his class telling fascinating stories about his career and the historical ¯gures he had encountered. He told us once, \Learning is best accomplished late at night, solving problems in the company of a good text book and a desk lamp." I have come to believe that the stories he told to motivate the desire to learn were at least as important as the examples he worked on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • "Homology and Homoplasy: a Philosophical Perspective"
    Homology and Introductory article Homoplasy: A Article Contents . The Concept of Homology up to Darwin . Adaptationist, Taxic and Developmental Concepts of Philosophical Perspective Homology . Developmental Homology Ron Amundson, University of Hawaii at Hilo, Hawaii, USA . Character Identity Networks Online posting date: 15th October 2012 Homology refers to the underlying sameness of distinct Homology is sameness, judged by various kinds of body parts or other organic features. The concept became similarity. The recognition of body parts that are shared by crucial to the understanding of relationships among different kinds of organisms dates at least back to Aristotle, organisms during the early nineteenth century. Its but acceptance of this fact as scientifically important to biology developed during the first half of the nineteenth importance has vacillated during the years between the century. In an influential definition published in 1843, publication of Darwin’s Origin of Species and recent times. Richard Owen defined homologues as ‘the same organ in For much of the twentieth century, homology was different animals under every variety of form and function’ regarded as nothing more than evidence of common (Owen, 1843). Owen had a very particular kind of struc- descent. In recent times, however, it has regained its for- tural sameness in mind. It was not to be confused with mer importance. It is regarded by advocates of evo- similarities that are due to shared function, which were lutionary developmental biology as a source of evidence termed ‘analogy.’ Bird wings are not homologous to insect for developmental constraint, and evidence for biases in wings, even though they look similar and perform the same phenotypic variation and the commonalities in organic function.
    [Show full text]
  • Encoding Properties of Haltere Neurons Enable Motion Feature Detection in a Biological Gyroscope
    Encoding properties of haltere neurons enable motion feature detection in a biological gyroscope Jessica L. Foxa,1, Adrienne L. Fairhalla,b, and Thomas L. Daniela,c aProgram in Neurobiology and Behavior, bDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, and cDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Edited by John G. Hildebrand, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved January 4, 2010 (received for review October 30, 2009) The halteres of dipteran insects are essential sensory organs for flight be transmitted directly to a motor neuron via an electrotonic gap control. They are believed to detect Coriolis and other inertial forces junction (12), and thus is not further refined in the central nervous associated with body rotation during flight. Flies use this information system before affecting behavior (13, 14). By characterizing the for rapid flight control. We show that the primary afferent neurons of encoding properties, we are able to examine neural information the haltere’s mechanoreceptors respond selectively with high tempo- processing at the earliest sensory and immediate premotor levels ral precision to multiple stimulus features. Although we are able to simultaneously. In doing so, we reveal the mechanisms by which identify many stimulus features contributing to the response using neurons convert complex stimuli into a train of spikes that can be principal component analysis, predictive models using only two fea- immediately used to control a complex behavior. tures, common across the cell population, capture most of the cells’ encoding activity. However, different sensitivity to these two fea- Results turespermits eachcell to respond to sinusoidal stimuli with a different Haltere Afferents Show Diverse Responses to Complex Stimuli with preferred phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of the Thorax in Flies Tanvi Deora1, Namrata Gundiah2 and Sanjay P
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 1382-1395 doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 REVIEW Mechanics of the thorax in flies Tanvi Deora1, Namrata Gundiah2 and Sanjay P. Sane1,* ABSTRACT body size, which greatly facilitated adaptability by increasing their Insects represent more than 60% of all multicellular life forms, and are ecological range; and two, the evolution of flight, which enabled easily among the most diverse and abundant organisms on earth. dispersal, migration, predation or rapid escape from predator They evolved functional wings and the ability to fly, which enabled attacks. them to occupy diverse niches. Insects of the hyper-diverse orders Although miniature body forms are a common evolutionary trend show extreme miniaturization of their body size. The reduced body among other animals, including birds and mammals (e.g. Hanken size, however, imposes steep constraints on flight ability, as their and Wake, 1993), miniaturization takes on a rather extreme form in wings must flap faster to generate sufficient forces to stay aloft. Here, insects. For example, the size of adult parasitic chalcid wasps such ∼ we discuss the various physiological and biomechanical adaptations as Kikiki huna ( 150 µm) or the trichogrammatid wasp ∼ of the thorax in flies which enabled them to overcome the myriad Megaphragma mymaripenne ( 170 µm) is comparable to that of constraints of small body size, while ensuring very precise control of some unicellular protozoan organisms (Polilov, 2012, 2015); these their wing motion. One such adaptation is the evolution of specialized wasps are among the smallest metazoans ever described. Such myogenic or asynchronous muscles that power the high-frequency extreme miniaturization is especially common among parasitoid – wing motion, in combination with neurogenic or synchronous steering insects belonging to three of the five insect groups Diptera (flies), – muscles that control higher-order wing kinematic patterns.
    [Show full text]