DOCSLIB.ORG

3. Refuge Resources and Current Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3. Refuge Resources and Current Management Chapter 3: Refuge Resources and Current Management 3. Refuge Resources and Current Management This chapter provides a detailed description of the Refuge, its habitats, the species that occur, how habitat and species are managed, and the recreational opportunities it offers. 3.1 Landscape Setting To effectively achieve the National Wildlife Refuge System mission of conserving fish, wildlife, and their habitats, the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge took a landscape-scale approach to identifying Refuge resources, issues, and management direction. The Refuge is one small portion of land within a larger landscape and, as such, looked beyond its boundaries to determine its role in the larger conservation effort. This section describes the landscape setting in which Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge is located. 3.1.1 Central Flyway Bird migration is the seasonal movement of birds between summer nesting habitat in Canada and the northern United States and wintering habitat in the southern United States and Central and South America. These movements generally follow regular routes called flyways. There are four administrative flyways in North America: the Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and Pacific. Waterfowl and other birds pass over, rest, and utilize many refuges in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Refuge System throughout the four administrative flyways. The Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge is situated in the middle of the Central Flyway. The Central Flyway spans the Canadian Northwest Territory, two Canadian provinces (Alberta and Saskatchewan), numerous countries in Central and South America, and 11 U.S. states: Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas (Fuller 2000). Of the approximately 151 national wildlife refuges and/or waterfowl management units located in the 11 states found within the Central Flyway, 36 are located in New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma, which are managed by the Service’s Southwest Region. Many refuges within the Central Flyway were established primarily for the protection and conservation of waterfowl and other bird species. The Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge is one of eight refuges located within the State of Oklahoma. The Refuge provides valuable wintering habitat for waterfowl through the establishment of over 15 reservoir lakes and ponds comprised of nearly 800 acres of open water. These reservoir lakes provide habitat for resting, feeding, and breeding for many waterfowl species. These areas provide valuable habitat to sustain waterfowl and their energy requirements for spring migration and reproductive success. In any given year, ducks and geese utilize Refuge lake and pond reservoirs as wintering habitat. 3.1.2 Strategic Habitat Conservation and the Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative Strategic Habitat Conservation (SHC) is an adaptive resource management framework for making management decisions about where and how to deliver conservation efficiently to achieve specific biological outcomes (see Chapter 1) (USFWS 2006). It provides an avenue for making strategic decisions and encourages constant reassessment and improvement. These critical steps aid the Service in dealing with a range of landscape-scale resource threats such as habitat Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge DRAFT CCP and Environmental Assessment 3-1 Chapter 3: Refuge Resources and Current Management fragmentation, genetic isolation, spread of invasive species, and water scarcity—all of which are accelerated by climate change. SHC incorporates five key principles in an ongoing process that changes and evolves: . Biological planning (setting targets) . Conservation design (developing a plan to meet goals) . Conservation delivery (implementing the plan) . Monitoring and adaptive management (measuring success and improving results) . Research (increasing our understanding) In April 2009, the Service, working with U.S. Geological Survey, initiated an effort to identify a national geographic framework for implementing SHC at landscape scales. The framework provides a comprehensive, landscape focused platform that extends nationally and globally beyond national wildlife refuge boundaries and Service jurisdictions. Within the scope of affected landscapes, the Service works with diverse partners to connect site-specific conservation efforts to broader landscape conservation goals, strategies, and outcomes. The Service used this landscape-level geographic framework as a base geography for identifying Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs). LCCs are developed on the foundation of Strategic Habitat Conservation (SHC). LCCs are management-science partnerships between the Service, Federal agencies, states, tribes, local governments, landowners, and other organizations to facilitate resource management across broad landscapes. The LCCs provide a nationwide network of scientifically credible units that optimize conservation delivery for priority species and allow for analytical comparisons of conservation results across the network. LCCs provide a consistent context for conservation action at a landscape scale by considering the entire range of a priority species or suite of species. LCCs ensure that resource managers have the information and decision making tools needed to conserve fish, wildlife, and their habitats in the most efficient and effective way possible. LCCs consist of 22 broad geographic areas, which were developed by aggregating Joint Venture’s Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) with Freshwater Ecoregions of the World and Omernick’s ecological units. BCRs are part of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative and are biologically-based, geographic delineations that represent long-standing partnerships to deliver avian conservation planning and design at the landscape scale. There are 67 BCRs identified, 35 of which fall entirely or partially within the United States (NABCI 2010). Similarly, Freshwater Ecoregions of the World are biologically-based units for aquatic species, and Omernick’s ecological units integrate diverse non-avian, terrestrial species needs. The Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge lies within the Great Plains LCC (GPLCC), with a geographic area that encompasses parts of eight states: New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming. It falls along the boundaries of two BCRs: 18 (shortgrass prairie), and 19 (central mixed-grass prairie) (see Figure 3-1). The GPLCC boundary also corresponds with the administrative boundaries of the Playa Lakes and Rainwater Basin Joint Ventures. The Rainwater Basin Joint Venture is restricted to the BCR 19 portion of Nebraska, the remaining areas within BCR 18 and 19 are within the administrative boundary of the Playa Lakes Joint Venture. 3-2 Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge DRAFT CCP and Environmental Assessment U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Flyway, BCR, and LCC Comanche County, Oklahoma Canada ^_ Mexico Legend ^_ Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Major Central Flyway Routes Central Mixed-Grass Prairie BCR Great Plains LCC PRODUCED IN THE DIVISION OF REFUGE PLANNING 0 100 200 400 ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO Miles LAND STATUS CURRENT TO: 5/31/09 MAP DATE: January, 2011 Kilometers BASEMAP: N/A 0 100 200 400 MERIDIAN: N/A UTM ZONE 14 FILE: wmw_flyway_bcr_lcc_1.19.11_shl NAD 83 Chapter 3: Refuge Resources and Current Management Federal lands within the GPLCC include: Bureau of Land Management public lands in southeastern New Mexico, 11 Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuges, and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service grasslands and forests in New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska, and lands managed by the Department of Defense, Bureau of Reclamation, and National Park Service. State-owned lands are an important component of the GPLCC; many contribute habitats necessary to support priority species. The majority of the GPLCC area is under private ownership (GPLCC 2009). Numerous conservation partnerships exist within the GPLCC. The Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership within the states of OK and TX is formally recognized through the National Fish Habitat Action Plan, and multiple reservoirs in all GPLCC states are included in the Reservoir Fisheries Habitat Partnership. Strong conservation partnership coalitions are associated with the Playa Lakes and Rainwater Basin Joint Ventures, including: The Nature Conservancy (TNC), State fish and wildlife agencies, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Farm Service Agency, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Partners for Fish and Wildlife program (GPLCC 2009). Utilizing State Wildlife Plans, and ecoregion plans developed by TNC and the Service, six landscapes have been identified as high priority landscapes within the GPLCC: (1) contiguous grasslands in the short grass and mixed grass prairies, (2) playa wetlands, (3) riparian streams, (4) prairie rivers, (5) Cross-timbers, and (6) savannahs, shrub lands, and sand dune systems. These landscapes, while not all-inclusive of the fish, wildlife, and plant habitats within the GPLCC area, represent important habitats for a variety of species (GPLCC 2009). The list of GPLCC priority habitats and associated species is summarized in the Table 3-1. Table 3-1. Priority Habitats and Species of the Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative Habitat Priority Species Grasslands Burrowing owl, black-tailed prairie dog, American bison, American burying beetle, black-footed ferret, mountain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mountains, Streams, and Lakes of Oklahoma I
    Information Series #1, June 1998 Mountains, Streams, and Lakes of OklahomaI Kenneth S. Johnson2 INTRODUCTION valleys, hills, and plains throughout most of the re­ mainder of Oklahoma (Fig. 1). All the major lakes and Mountains and streams define the landscape of reservoirs of Oklahoma are man-made, and they are Oklahoma (Fig. 1). The mountains consist mainly of important for flood contr()l, water supply, recreation, resistant rock masses that were folded, faulted, and and generation of hydroelectric power. Natural lakes thrust upward in the geologic past (Fig. 2), whereas in Oklahoma are limited to oxbow lakes along major the streams have persisted in eroding less-resistant streams and to playa lakes in the High Plains region rock units and lowering the landscape to form broad of the west. Alphabetical List of20 Lakes with Largest Surface Area (from Oklahoma Water Atlas, Oklahoma Water Resources Board) 1. Broken Bow 11. Lake 0' The Cherokees 2. Canton 12. Oologah 3. Eufaula 13. Robert s. Kerr 4. Fort Gibson 14. Sardis 5. Foss 15. Skiatook 6. Great Salt Plains 16. Tenkiller Ferry ·7. Hudson 17. Texoma 8. Hugo 18. Waurika 9. Kaw 19. Webbers Falls 10. Keystone 20. Wister Modified from Historical Atlas of Oklahoma, by John W. Morris, Charles R. Goins, and Edwin C. 25 McReynolds. Copyright © 1986 by the University I of Oklahoma Press. o 40 80Km Figure 1. Mountains, streams, and principal lakes of Oklahoma. lReprinted from Oklahoma Geology Notes (1993), vol. 53, no. 5, p. 180-188. The Notes article was reprinted and expanded from Oklahoma Almanac, 1993-1994, Oklahoma Department of Lihraries, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5228
    S5228 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE July 31, 2019 Oklahoma City area and all around You can’t go through Oklahoma Mr. HAWLEY. Mr. President, I op- Tulsa, to spend as much time as I can without stopping at Cattlemen’s pose the confirmation of U.S. District with as many different people as I can Steakhouse and enjoying a great steak Court nominee Karin Immergut. She to find out what is going on in Okla- or without driving out west to see the went through the committee confirma- homa. I get this one precious month a Stafford Air & Space Museum. People tion process in 2018, before I joined the year to make sure I have focus time in who travel to Washington, DC, go to Senate Judiciary Committee, and sub- the State to see as many people as I the Air and Space Museum, and I will sequently, she was part of a package of can. often smile at them and say: Do not judges who were renominated and I got to thinking about this and the miss the Air & Space Museum that is voted out earlier this year. I later privilege that I have really had in in Weatherford, OK, because the Staf- learned that the nominee had issued a being able to travel around my State ford Air & Space Museum has a re- questionable abortion opinion and is and see so many people and so many markable collection from a fantastic pro-choice. places, to get on Route 66, travel the Oklahoma astronaut. f State from east to west, and see ex- The Great Salt Plains in Jet and the EXECUTIVE CALENDAR actly what is going on.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps As Means of Social
    THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS AS MEANS OF SOCIAL CONTROL: A SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA PERSPECTIVE By LEON CHAD KINDER Bachelor of Science Southwestern Oklahoma State University Weatherford, Oklahoma 1993 Master of Education Southwestern Oklahoma State University Weatherford, Oklahoma 1995 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION December, 2003 Tueiis 2DD3D K5lc THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS AS MEANS OF SOCIAL CONTROL: A SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA PERSPECTIVE Thesis Approved: ,~(l,g ,, Thesis Advisor ~ Dean of the Graduate College 11 PREFACE I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Lowell Caneday, my dissertation advisor, for the many hours he spent in support of my work. To Dr. Christine Cashel, doctoral committee chair, my deepest appreciation is extended. Thanks is also expressed to the other members of the doctoral committee, Dr. William Bryans, Dr. Colleen Hood, and Dr. Thomas Kuzmic for their time, suggestions, and support given in the development of this project. I also wish to express thanks to my mentor, Dr. Ken Rose, Dean of the School of Professional and Graduate Studies at Southwestern Oklahoma State University, for his assistance and support during my doctoral work. To my wife Gayla, children Natalie and Carson, and members of my extended family a special thanks is given. Thank-you all for your love and support. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION, STATEMENT OF THESIS AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................................... 1 Introduction and Statement of Thesis ............................ 1 The Great Depression ............................................. .2 The Great Depression in Oklahoma .............................. 3 Hoover's Response to the Great Depression ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Today Spring 1980 Volume 30 No. 2
    HONORABLE GEORGE NIGH Great Plains Country Enters The 1980s .....................4 Governor By Sue Carter VOLUME 30 NUMBER 2 SPRING 1980 Mountain Climbers' Paradise: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. ... 8 By Paul McCl~ng SUE CARTER PAUL E. LEFEBVRE Editor Art and Production BlLL BUSCH Dauntless Gold Seekers of the Wichitas .................... 11 C~rculat~on and Promotion By Steve Wilson Published hy the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreauon Deparln~enl Delores Buffalo Takes Us To Indian City. ..... BvJoye R. Boulton COMMISSION MEMBERS LT. GOV. SPENCER BERNARD BOB HODDER JIM PATE Wedding at Holy City. ..... Chalrman Oklahoma C~tyV~ce Chalrman Mad111 Secretary By Sheila Samples JAKE J SIMMONS. JR LARRY FIELD Muskogee Guymon Pageantry, Tradition Follow The Artillery Hunt .... BOB HINTON CELlA ROSENBERGER WR DICK STUBBS By Sheila Samples Altus Tulsa Henryetta BILL KELLOW. Dlr ABE L HESSER RON ACREE. Dlr Red Rock Canyon Family Reunion. ...... Tour~smPromollon Plannlng & Development Execut~veD~rector By Judith Wall W D JOHNSON. Dlr ROBERT A PIKE Dlr KEN FLAMING Dlr Adm~n~strat~on State Parks State Lodges Quartz Mountain Resort Fascinates Hikers .................. 25 11 1s Ihe purvose 01 Oklahoma Today lo dovole llself lo Ihe enule stale 01 Oklaho~naand 11s evay poslllve aspecl the scenery culture recreallonal and vls~lorallracllny evenls 11s lndustly nalural and By John Davis man made wonders 11s achievements 11s herrlage 11s presenl and 11s tulure Quartz Visitors Discover The World of Jeff Briley, Naturalist. ...... 27 502 WILL ROGERS BUILDING .Oklahoma C~ty73105 .(405) 521-2496 By Gary Lantz $5 00 Pel Year In U S S9 00 Elsewhere SI 25 Srnyle Copy Copyr~ghl1980 by Oklahoma Today Mayazrne L~lho111 Oklaho~na Restaurant Diners Enjoy Tales Of Oklahoma's First Resort .......
    [Show full text]
  • TOPOGRAPHIC MAP of OKLAHOMA Kenneth S
    Page 2, Topographic EDUCATIONAL PUBLICATION 9: 2008 Contour lines (in feet) are generalized from U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps (scale, 1:250,000). Principal meridians and base lines (dotted black lines) are references for subdividing land into sections, townships, and ranges. Spot elevations ( feet) are given for select geographic features from detailed topographic maps (scale, 1:24,000). The geographic center of Oklahoma is just north of Oklahoma City. Dimensions of Oklahoma Distances: shown in miles (and kilometers), calculated by Myers and Vosburg (1964). Area: 69,919 square miles (181,090 square kilometers), or 44,748,000 acres (18,109,000 hectares). Geographic Center of Okla- homa: the point, just north of Oklahoma City, where you could “balance” the State, if it were completely flat (see topographic map). TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF OKLAHOMA Kenneth S. Johnson, Oklahoma Geological Survey This map shows the topographic features of Oklahoma using tain ranges (Wichita, Arbuckle, and Ouachita) occur in southern contour lines, or lines of equal elevation above sea level. The high- Oklahoma, although mountainous and hilly areas exist in other parts est elevation (4,973 ft) in Oklahoma is on Black Mesa, in the north- of the State. The map on page 8 shows the geomorphic provinces The Ouachita (pronounced “Wa-she-tah”) Mountains in south- 2,568 ft, rising about 2,000 ft above the surrounding plains. The west corner of the Panhandle; the lowest elevation (287 ft) is where of Oklahoma and describes many of the geographic features men- eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas is a curved belt of forested largest mountainous area in the region is the Sans Bois Mountains, Little River flows into Arkansas, near the southeast corner of the tioned below.
    [Show full text]
  • Washita Basin Project Oklahoma
    Washita Basin Project Oklahoma James M. Bailey, Ph.D. Bureau of Reclamation 2008 0 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. 1 Washita Basin Project ...................................................................................................... 2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................. 3 Prehistoric and Historic Setting .................................................................................. 4 Project Investigation and Authorization .................................................................. 11 Project Construction................................................................................................... 16 Uses of Project Water ................................................................................................. 30 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 32 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 33 Index................................................................................................................................. 35 1 Washita Basin Project Located adjacent to America’s arid west/humid east division line known as the 100th meridian, western Oklahoma’s rolling uplands are susceptible to unpredictable weather cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Western Cheilanthoid Ferns in Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 65 Volume 10, December 2010 FOUR WESTERN CHEILANTHOID FERNS IN OKLAHOMA Bruce A. Smith McLoud High School McLoud, Oklahoma 74851 Keywords: arid, distribution, habitat, key ABSTRACT The diversity of ferns in some of the more arid climates of western Oklahoma is surprising. This article examines four Oklahoma cheilanthoid ferns: Astrolepis integerrima, Cheilanthes wootonii, Notholaena standleyi, and Pellaea wrightiana. With the exceptions of A. integerrima and P. wrightiana which occur in Alabama and North Carolina respectively, all four species reach their eastern limits of distribution in Oklahoma. Included in this article are common names, synonyms, brief descriptions, distinguishing characteristics, U.S. and Oklahoma distribution, habitat information, state abundance, and a dichotomous key to selected cheilanthoids. The Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory has determined that all but one (N. standleyi) are species of concern in the state. INTRODUCTION of eastern Oklahoma, while most members of the Pteridaceae occur in Almost half of the ferns in the family western Oklahoma (Taylor & Taylor Pteridaceae are xeric adapted ferns. In 1991). Oklahoma six genera and sixteen species Statewide, the most common species in the family are known to occur. They in the Pteridaceae is Pellaea atropurpurea live on dry or moist rocks and can be (Figure 4), which can be found found in rock crevices, at the bases of throughout the body of the state and boulders, or on rocky ledges. Common Cimarron County in the panhandle. The associated species include lichens, mosses, rarest are Cheilanthes horridula and liverworts, and spike mosses. Two Cheilanthes lindheimeri. Cheilanthes horridula physical characteristics that unite the and Cheilanthes lindheimeri have only been family are the marginal sori (Figure 1) and seen in one county each, Murray and the lack of a true indusium.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY of SCIENCE Volume 98 2018
    PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Volume 98 2018 EDITOR: Mostafa Elshahed Production Editor: Tammy Austin Business Manager: T. David Bass The Official Organ of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Which was established in 1909 for the purpose of stimulating scientific research; to promote fraternal relationships among those engaged in scientific work in Oklahoma; to diffuse among the citizens of the State a knowledge of the various departments of science; and to investigate and make known the material, educational, and other resources of the State. Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Publication Date: January 2019 ii POLICIES OF THE PROCEEDINGS The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science contains papers on topics of interest to scientists. The goal is to publish clear communications of scientific findings and of matters of general concern for scientists in Oklahoma, and to serve as a creative outlet for other scientific contributions by scientists. ©2018 Oklahoma Academy of Science The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy Base and/or other appropriate repository. of Science contains reports that describe the Information necessary for retrieval of the results of original scientific investigation data from the repository will be specified in (including social science). Papers are received a reference in the paper. with the understanding that they have not been published previously or submitted for 4. Manuscripts that report research involving publication elsewhere. The papers should be human subjects or the use of materials of significant scientific quality, intelligible to a from human organs must be supported by broad scientific audience, and should represent a copy of the document authorizing the research conducted in accordance with accepted research and signed by the appropriate procedures and scientific ethics (proper subject official(s) of the institution where the work treatment and honesty).
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Vegetation of Oklahoma! RALPH W· KELTING, Unberlltj of Tulia, Tulia Add WJL T
    126 PROCEEDINGS OF THE OKLAHOMA Literature on the Vegetation of Oklahoma! RALPH W· KELTING, UnberlltJ of Tulia, Tulia aDd WJL T. PENFOUND, UnlYenlty of Oklahoma, Norman The original stimulus tor this bibliographic compilation on the vegeta­ tion of Oklahoma came from Dr. Frank Egler, Norfolk, Connecticut, who is sponsoring a series ot such papers for aU the states of the country. Oklahoma is especially favorable for the study· of vegetation since it is a border state between the cold temperate North and the warm temperature South, and between the arid West and the humid East. In recognition of the above climatic differences, the state has been divided into seven sec­ tions. The parallel of 35 degrees, 30 minutes North Latitude has been utiUzed to divide the state into northern and southern portions. The state has been further divided into panhandle, western, central, and eastern sections, by the use of the following meridians: 96 degrees W., 98 degrees ·W., and 100 degrees W. In all cases, county lines have been followed so that counties would not be partitioned between two or more sections. The seven sections are as follows: Panhandle, PH; N9rthwest, NW; Southwest, SW; North Central, NC; South Central, SC; Northeast, NE; and Southeast, SE (Figure 1). The various sections of the state have unique topographic features ot interest to the student of vegetation. These sections and included topo­ graphic features are as tollows: Panhandle: Black Mesa, high plains, playas (wet weather ponds); Northwest: Antelope Ht1Is, Glass Mountains, gypsum hUls, sand desert, Waynoka Dunes, salt plains, Great Salt Plains Reservoir; Southwest: gypsum hills, Wichita Mountains, Altus-Lugert Reservoir; North Central: redbed plains, sandstone hills, prairie plains; South Central: redbed plains, sandstone hUls, Arbuckle Mountains, Lake Texoma; Northeast: Ozark Plateau, Grand Lake;.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Disposals Alabama Through Arkansas
    SANITARY DispOSAls Alabama through Arkansas Boniface Chevron Kanaitze Chevron Alaska State Parks Fool Hollow State Park ALABAMA 2801 Boniface Pkwy., Mile 13, Kenai Spur Road, Ninilchik Mile 187.3, (928) 537-3680 I-65 Welcome Center Anchorage Kenai Sterling Hwy. 1500 N. Fool Hollow Lake Road, Show Low. 1 mi. S of Ardmore on I-65 at Centennial Park Schillings Texaco Service Tundra Lodge milepost 364 $6 fee if not staying 8300 Glenn Hwy., Anchorage Willow & Kenai, Kenai Mile 1315, Alaska Hwy., Tok at campground Northbound Rest Area Fountain Chevron Bailey Power Station City Sewage Treatment N of Asheville on I-59 at 3608 Minnesota Dr., Manhole — Tongass Ave. Plant at Old Town Lyman Lake State Park milepost 165 11 mi. S of St. Johns; Anchorage near Cariana Creek, Ketchikan Valdez 1 mi. E of U.S. 666 Southbound Rest Area Garrett’s Tesoro Westside Chevron Ed Church S of Asheville on I-59 Catalina State Park 2811 Seward Hwy., 2425 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan Mile 105.5, Richardson Hwy., 12 mi. N of on U.S. 89 at milepost 168 Anchorage Valdez Tucson Charlie Brown’s Chevron Northbound Rest Area Alamo Lake State Park Indian Hills Chevron Glenn Hwy. & Evergreen Ave., Standard Oil Station 38 mi. N of & U.S. 60 S of Auburn on I-85 6470 DeBarr Rd., Anchorage Palmer Egan & Meals, Valdez Wenden at milepost 43 Burro Creek Mike’s Chevron Palmer’s City Campground Front St. at Case Ave. (Bureau of Land Management) Southbound Rest Area 832 E. Sixth Ave., Anchorage S. Denali St., Palmer Wrangell S of Auburn on I-85 57 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleotectonic Investigations of the Permian System in the United States
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 1967 Paleotectonic Investigations of the Permian System in the United States Edwin D. McKee Stephen S. Oriel Henry L. Berryhill Eleanor J. Crosby Donald A. Myers See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Hydrology Commons, and the Other Earth Sciences Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Edwin D. McKee, Stephen S. Oriel, Henry L. Berryhill, Eleanor J. Crosby, Donald A. Myers, George H. Dixon, Marjorie E. MacLachlan, Melville R. Mudge, Edwin K. Maughan, Richard P. Sheldon, Earl R. Cressman, Thomas M. Cheney, Walter E. Hallgarth, and Keith B. Ketner Paleotectonic Investigations of the Permian System in the United States GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROfESSIONAL PAPER 515 w- PALEOTECTONIC INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PERMIAN SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES RECONSTRUCTION OF SEASCAPE IN GLASS MOUNTAIN AREA, BREWSTER COUNTY, TEXAS, DURING MIDDLE PART (LEONARD) OF PERMIAN TIME The reconstruction is based on a diorama prepared by George Marchard for the U- S National Museum. Technical assistance for the reconstruction was fur­ nished by G. Arthur Cooper and G. Edward Lewis. Paleotectonic Investigations of the Permian System in the United States By E. D. McKEE, S. S. ORIEL, and others GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 515 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L.
    [Show full text]