Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Thomas A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Thomas A Science in medicine Gestational diabetes mellitus Thomas A. Buchanan1 and Anny H. Xiang2 1Departments of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Physiology and Biophysics, and 2Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as glucose intolerance of various degrees that is first detected during pregnancy. GDM is detected through the screening of pregnant women for clinical risk factors and, among at-risk women, testing for abnormal glucose tolerance that is usually, but not invariably, mild and asymptomatic. GDM appears to result from the same broad spectrum of physiological and genetic abnormalities that characterize diabetes outside of pregnancy. Indeed, women with GDM are at high risk for having or developing diabetes when they are not pregnant. Thus, GDM provides a unique opportunity to study the early pathogenesis of diabetes and to develop interventions to prevent the disease. Historical perspective currently recommended by the American Diabetes Association For more than a century, it has been known that diabetes antedat- (12) are based on O’Sullivan’s criteria (see above). The detection ing pregnancy can have severe adverse effects on fetal and neona- of GDM, a condition that is generally asymptomatic, involves tal outcomes (1). As early as in the 1940s, it was recognized that screening in 2 sequential steps (Tables 1 and 2), followed by women who developed diabetes years after pregnancy had expe- administration of a 2- or 3-hour OGTT (Table 3) to women deter- rienced abnormally high fetal and neonatal mortality (2). By the mined to be at risk by screening. Women with very high clinical 1950s the term “gestational diabetes” was applied to what was risk characteristics may be diagnosed with probable pregestation- thought to be a transient condition that affected fetal outcomes al (preexisting) diabetes based on the criteria provided in Table adversely, then abated after delivery (3). In the 1960s, O’Sullivan 4. When the diagnostic criteria for a 3-hour OGTT presented in found that the degree of glucose intolerance during pregnancy Table 3 was applied to a group of Caucasian women in Toronto, was related to the risk of developing diabetes after pregnancy. He approximately 7% had GDM (6). The frequency of GDM may vary proposed criteria for the interpretation of oral glucose tolerance among ethnic groups (higher in groups with increased prevalence tests (OGTTs) during pregnancy that were fundamentally statisti- of hyperglycemia) (13–16) and with the use of different diagnostic cal, establishing cut-off values — approximately 2 standard devia- criteria (higher when lower glucose thresholds are applied and vice tions — for diagnosing glucose intolerance during pregnancy (4). versa) (4). Nonetheless, all approaches to GDM detection pinpoint In the 1980s those cut-off points were adapted to modern meth- — and thereby allow diagnosis of — women with glucose tolerance ods for measuring glucose and applied to the modern definition in the upper end of the population distribution during pregnancy. of gestational diabetes — glucose intolerance with onset or first A small minority of those women have glucose levels that would recognition during pregnancy (5). While based on O’Sullivan’s be diagnostic of diabetes outside of pregnancy (Table 4). The great values for predicting diabetes after pregnancy, the diagnosis of majority have lower glucose levels. Both groups impart to their gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) also identifies pregnancies at offspring an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and long-term increased risk for perinatal morbidity (6–8) and long-term obesity obesity and diabetes that appear to be related at least in part to and glucose intolerance in offspring (9–11). fetal overnutrition in utero. They also incur for themselves a risk of diabetes after pregnancy that is the main focus of this paper. Population perspective Clinical detection of GDM is carried out to identify pregnan- Etiology and pathogenesis cies at increased risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Available data do not identify a threshold of maternal glycemia Normal pregnancy at which such risk begins or increases rapidly. A multinational A detailed discussion of glucose regulation in pregnancy is beyond study, the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome study, the scope of this paper. However, 2 points are important for the is underway to explore this issue in a large multiethnic cohort. discussion that follows. First, pregnancy is normally attended by In the absence of a defined glucose threshold for perinatal risk, progressive insulin resistance that begins near mid-pregnancy and many different sets of glycemic criteria have been proposed and progresses through the third trimester to levels that approximate are employed worldwide for the diagnosis of GDM. The criteria the insulin resistance seen in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The insulin resistance appears to result from a combination of Nonstandard abbreviations used: DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; GAD, increased maternal adiposity and the insulin-desensitizing effects glutamic acid decarboxylase; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; MODY, maturity- of hormonal products of the placenta. The fact that insulin resis- onset diabetes of the young; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; TRIPOD; Troglitazone tance rapidly abates following delivery suggests that the major in Prevention of Diabetes. contributors to this state of resistance are placental hormones. The Conflict of interest: T.A. Buchanan and A.H. Xiang receive grant support from Take- second point is that pancreatic β cells normally increase their insu- da Pharmaceuticals North America Inc. T.A. Buchanan is also a consultant to Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc. and is on the company’s Actos Speakers’ Bureau. lin secretion to compensate for the insulin resistance of pregnancy Citation for this article: J. Clin. Invest. 115:485–491 (2005). (see Figure 1, for example). As a result, changes in circulating glu- doi:10.1172/JCI200524531. cose levels over the course of pregnancy are quite small compared The Journal of Clinical Investigation http://www.jci.org Volume 115 Number 3 March 2005 485 science in medicine Table 1 Screening for GDM, step 1: clinical risk assessmentA,B Risk category Clinical characteristics Recommended screening High risk (presence of Marked obesity Blood glucose screening at initial antepartum visit or as any is sufficient) Diabetes in first-degree relative(s) soon as possible thereafter; repeat at 24–28 wk if not Personal history of glucose intolerance already diagnosed with GDM by that time Prior delivery of macrosomic infant Current glycosuria Average risk Fits neither low- nor high-risk profile Blood glucose screening between 24 and 28 wk gestation Low risk (all required) Age <25 Blood glucose screening not required Low-risk ethnicityC No diabetes in first-degree relatives Normal prepregnancy weight and pregnancy weight gain No personal history of abnormal glucose levels No prior poor obstetrical outcomes ABased on recommendations of the American Diabetes Association (5). BPerformed at initial antepartum visit. CEthnicities other than Hispanic, African, Native American, South or East Asian, Pacific Islander, or indigenous Australian, all of which have relatively high rates of GDM. Adapted with permission from N. Engl. J. Med. (72). Copyright 1999, Massachussets Medical Society. All rights reserved. with the large changes in insulin sensitivity. Robust plasticity of with GDM have the same markers present in their circulation (17, β cell function in the face of progressive insulin resistance is the 28–31). Although detailed physiological studies of these women are hallmark of normal glucose regulation during pregnancy. lacking, they most likely have inadequate insulin secretion resulting from autoimmune damage to and destruction of pancreatic β cells. Gestational diabetes They appear to have evolving type 1 diabetes, which comes to clini- GDM is a form of hyperglycemia. In general, hyperglycemia results cal attention through routine glucose screening during pregnancy. from an insulin supply that is inadequate to meet tissue demands The frequency of anti–islet cell and anti-GAD antibodies detected in for normal blood glucose regulation. Studies conducted during late GDM tends to parallel ethnic trends in the prevalence of type 1 dia- pregnancy, when, as discussed below, insulin requirements are high betes outside of pregnancy. Patients with anti–islet cell or anti-GAD and differ only slightly between normal and gestational diabetic antibodies often, but not invariably, are lean, and they can rapidly women, consistently reveal reduced insulin responses to nutrients in develop overt diabetes after pregnancy (30). women with GDM (17–23). Studies conducted before or after preg- nancy, when women with prior GDM are usually more insulin resis- Monogenic diabetes and GDM tant than normal women (also discussed below), often reveal insulin Monogenic diabetes mellitus has been identified outside of pregnan- responses that are similar in the 2 groups or reduced only slightly in cy in 2 general forms. Some patients have mutations in autosomes women with prior GDM (18, 22–26). However, when insulin levels (autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, commonly referred to and responses are expressed relative to each individual’s degree of as maturity-onset diabetes of the young [MODY], with
Recommended publications
  • Decrease of Fructosamine Levels During Treatment with Adalimumab
    European Journal of Endocrinology (2007) 156 291–293 ISSN 0804-4643 CASE REPORT Decrease of fructosamine levels during treatment with adalimumab in patients with both diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis I C van Eijk1, M J L Peters1,2, M T Nurmohamed1,2,3, A W van Deutekom4, B A C Dijkmans1,2 and S Simsek4 1Department of Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and 4Department of Endocrinology/Diabetes Center, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Correspondence should be addressed to S Simsek; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Tumour necrosis factor a (TNFa) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine which has been closely linked to obesity and insulin resistance. We present two cases of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and concomitant diabetes mellitus, who showed a marked decrease of fructosamine levels after initiating therapy with adalimumab, a TNFa-blocking agent, for active RA. This finding may implicate that TNFa blockade causes better glycaemic control in RA patients with concomitant diabetes, possibly by improving insulin resistance. European Journal of Endocrinology 156 291–293 Introduction Research design and methods Tumour necrosis factor a (TNFa), a pro-inflammatory A patient with known diabetes type 1 and concomitant cytokine, plays an important role in inflammatory and RA showed a marked improvement of HbA1c levels after autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). initiation of adalimumab, a recombinant human IgG1- TNFa has also been closely linked to obesity and insulin MAB, therapy for active RA when she visited the resistance (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Sensitivity and Resistin Levels in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus And
    European Journal of Endocrinology (2008) 158 173–178 ISSN 0804-4643 CLINICAL STUDY Insulin sensitivity and resistin levels in gestational diabetes mellitus and after parturition Ana Megia, Joan Vendrell, Cristina Gutierrez, Modest Sabate´1, Montse Broch, Jose´-Manuel Ferna´ndez-Real2 and Inmaculada Simo´n Endocrinology and Diabetes Research Department, University Hospital of Tarragona ‘Joan XXIII’, ‘Pere Virgili’ Institute, ‘Rovira i Virgili’ University, 43007, Tarragona, Spain, 1Laboratory Department, Hospital ‘ St Pau i Sta. Tecla’, 43003, Tarragona, Spain and 2Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, University Hospital ‘Josep Trueta’, 17007, Girona, Spain (Correspondence should be addressed to A Megia who is now at Seccio´ d’endocrinologı´a, Hospital Universitari ‘Joan XXIII’ de Tarragona, c/Mallafre´ Guasch, 4.43007 Tarragona, Spain; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Context: Resistin is expressed and secreted by the placenta during pregnancy. Increased serum resistin levels have been found in the second half of normal pregnancy, but its role in the pathogenesis of the insulin resistance of pregnancy is undetermined. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the relationship between circulating resistin levels and insulin sensitivity in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Design and setting: A case (nZ23)–control (nZ35) study was performed at the obstetrics and endocrinology clinic of a university hospital. Patients: In total, 58 Caucasian women with a singleton pregnancy who had been referred for a 100 g oral glucose tolerance test were enrolled between the weeks 26 and 30, and 22 women with GDM were also evaluated after pregnancy. Main outcome measures: Serum resistin and insulin sensitivity in GDM during and after pregnancy. The relationship of resistin to metabolic abnormalities was evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Am I at Risk for Gestational Diabetes?
    Am I at risk for gestational diabetes? U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development What is gestational diabetes? Gestational diabetes (pronounced jess-TAY-shun-ul die-uh-BEET-eez) is a type of high blood sugar that only pregnant women get. In fact, the word “gestational” means pregnant. If a woman gets high blood sugar when she’s pregnant, but she never had high blood sugar before, she has gestational diabetes. Between 2 percent and 10 percent of U.S. pregnancies are affected by the condition every year,1 making it one of the top health concerns related to pregnancy. If not treated, gestational diabetes can cause problems for mothers and babies, some of them serious. But there is good news. Most of the time, gestational diabetes goes away after the baby is born. The changes in your body that cause gestational diabetes normally occur only when you are pregnant. After the baby is born, your body goes back to normal and the condition goes away. Gestational diabetes is treatable, and the best outcomes result from careful management and control of blood sugar levels. The best way to control gestational diabetes is to find out you have it early and start treatment quickly. Treating gestational diabetes—even if you don’t have any symptoms or your symptoms are mild— greatly reduces health problems for mother and baby. Why do some women get gestational diabetes? Usually, the body breaks down much of the food you eat into a type of sugar, called glucose (pronounced GLOO-kos).
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Resistance Syndrome GOUTHAM RAO, M.D., University of Pittsburgh Medical Center–St
    CLINICAL OPINION Insulin Resistance Syndrome GOUTHAM RAO, M.D., University of Pittsburgh Medical Center–St. Margaret, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Insulin resistance can be linked to diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease and other abnormalities. These abnormalities constitute the insulin resistance OA patient infor- syndrome. Because resistance usually develops long before these diseases appear, mation handout on insulin resistance syn- identifying and treating insulin-resistant patients has potentially great preventive drome, written by the value. Insulin resistance should be suspected in patients with a history of diabetes in author of this article, first-degree relatives; patients with a personal history of gestational diabetes, poly- is provided on page cystic ovary syndrome or impaired glucose tolerance; and obese patients, particularly 1165. those with abdominal obesity. Present treatment consists of sensible lifestyle changes, including weight loss to attain healthy body weight, 30 minutes of accumulated mod- erate-intensity physical activity per day and increased dietary fiber intake. Pharma- cotherapy is not currently recommended for patients with isolated insulin resistance. (Am Fam Physician 2001;63:1159-63,1165-6.) besity, type 2 diabetes melli- malities, including obesity, hypertension, tus (formerly known as dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes, that are non–insulin-dependent dia- associated with insulin resistance and com- betes), hypertension, lipid pensatory hyperinsulinemia. However, a disorders and heart disease cause-and-effect relationship between in- Oare common in most Western societies and are sulin resistance, these diseases and the mech- collectively responsible for an enormous bur- anisms through which insulin resistance den of suffering. Many people have more than influences their development has yet to be one—and sometimes all—of these condi- conclusively demonstrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Resistance and Diabetes
    November 2018 I Healthcare Professionals Spotlight on Health Insulin Resistance and Diabetes Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) begins with insulin resistance—cells become less sensitive to the effects of insulin and consequently cannot absorb enough glucose from the blood. Worsening insulin resistance eventually leads to prediabetes, and then to type 2 DM. This newsletter will discuss insulin resistance and its relationship to prediabetes, Signs a Patient May Have type 2 DM, and other medical conditions ranging from cardiovascular to gynecologic. Also discussed are risk factors for insulin resistance, methods for diagnosis, and how Insulin Resistance lifestyle changes can treat insulin resistance and subsequently reduce the risk for Findings on history and physical developing diabetes. examination that should raise the suspicion of insulin resistance Development of Insulin Resistance and Type 2 DM include3,6 Insulin resistance, rather than elevated fasting glucose or glycated hemoglobin • Obesity, hypertension, or (HbA1c), is the earliest laboratory indicator of progression to type 2 DM. Insulin helps regulate blood glucose by stimulating glucose uptake by cells. In patients with insulin hyperlipidemia resistance, tissues do not respond fully to the effects of insulin. To compensate, • Increased waist circumference pancreatic beta cells produce greater amounts of insulin to maintain a normal blood (for sex/race) glucose level. Eventually, insulin resistance may become so severe that the beta cells • Metabolic syndrome can no longer produce enough insulin to compensate.1 When this happens, blood glucose rises to levels defining prediabetes (100 mg/dL to 125 mg/dL) and ultimately • Prediabetes type 2 DM (≥126 mg/dL).2 This progression from insulin resistance to onset of type 2 3 • Microvascular disease DM is believed to take 10 to 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Experience with Insulin Resistance, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Treated with Atypical Antipsychotic Agents
    David C. Henderson Clinical Experience With Insulin Resistance, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Treated With Atypical Antipsychotic Agents David C. Henderson, M.D. © Copyright 2001 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. Numerous reports have associated atypical antipsychotic agents with hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Although the mechanisms are poorly understood, clinical experi- ence suggests that these adverse effects are major areas of concern and require attention by the psychi- atric team and primary care clinicians. This article discusses my clinical experience with glucose metabolism impairment related to treatment with antipsychotic medications. (J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62[suppl 27]:10–14) BLOOD GLUCOSE DISORDERS 8 deaths. The majority of DKA episodes occurred in the One personal copy mayfirst be 6 printedmonths of treatment with clozapine. One patient DKA and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus actually developed diabetes immediately following an Recently, case reports have linked clozapine and olan- accidental 500-mg dose of clozapine. This highlights the zapine to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), diabetes mellitus serious potential risk associated with DM and DKA and (DM), and hyperglycemia.1–14 The reports of DKA with clo- should alert clinicians to be proactive in monitoring and zapine and olanzapine and possible increased incidence of preventing medical morbidity associated with psycho- type 2 diabetes mellitus may represent 2 separate popula- tropic medications. tions with varying risks. Several cases of DKA associated A recent case report20 described a 42-year-old, white, with clozapine and olanzapine have been reported, with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive man with majority of these cases resulting in partial or complete a history of chronic depression with psychotic features ad- remission when the drug was discontinued.1–3,5,6,8–10,12–18 mitted to the hospital for DKA while taking risperidone, Additionally, several cases of DKA resolved after clozapine fluoxetine, and trazodone.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Approaches to Improve Glycemic Control and Primary Diabetes Care 1‑Or 2‑Or 3‑Or
    DYNAMIC APPROACHES TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND PRIMARY DIABETES CARE DYNAMIC APPROACHES TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC Figure. CONTROL AND PRIMARY DIABETES CARE 1‑OR Characterizing Clinical Inertia in a Large, National Database CORI R. RATTELMAN, ANUPAMA ARORA, JOHN K. CUDDEBACK, ELIZABETH L. CIEMINS, Alexandria, VA Objective: To characterize clinical inertia in the treatment of diabetes using a large, geographically diverse clinical database. Study Design: A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted in a clinical database containing 22 million patient records across 22 health care organizations (HCOs). Population Studied: A total of 281,000 patients aged 18-75 were included during the 5.5-year study period (1/2012-6/2017). Patients had an outpatient visit in the last 12 months of the study period, an HbA1c in the last 24-30 months (index A1c), and a diagnosis of type 2 DM on a claim or EHR prob- lem list at least 6 months prior to index A1c. A subset of 47,693 patients with an index A1c ≥8 and a prior A1c ≥8 or lack thereof, was observed for Supported By: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases four 6-month follow-up periods for actions including a new class of diabetes (T35DK104689); Yale University medication prescribed or an A1c <8. The absence of observable action fol- lowing index A1c suggests potential “clinical inertia.” Principal Findings: Six months following an index A1c≥8, 55% of patients 3‑OR received no observable clinical action ranging from 45-65% across HCOs Influence of Diabetes Complications on the Cost‑Effectiveness of and 18-96% across individual providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Severe Insulin Resistance
    e116 Diabetes Care Volume 39, August 2016 Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Cemre Robinson,1,2 Elaine Cochran,3 Phillip Gorden,3 and Severe Insulin Resistance Rebecca J. Brown3 Diabetes Care 2016;39:e116–e118 | DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0635 Syndromes of severe insulin resistance developed fatigue, malaise, and Kussmaul and escalating doses of insulin with- (IR) include mutations of or autoanti- respirations. out improvement (A1C 12% [108 bodies to the insulin receptor and lipo- He presented to an outside hospital mmol/mol]). dystrophy (1). Diabetic ketoacidosis with DKA with a pH of 7.08, partial pres- Six months after diagnosis, she pre- (DKA), although rare, can occur in these sure CO2 of 27 mmHg, and bicarbonate sented to an outside hospital with an- patients, even in the context of hyper- of 8 mmol/L. He received fluid resusci- orexia, fever, tachycardia, and tachypnea. insulinemia, due to impaired insulin tation for an estimated 10% dehydration. Exam showed uveitis, severe diffuse acan- signaling. DKA can be extremely chal- In collaboration with National Institutes thosis nigricans, and multiple granulating lenging to treat, and few clinicians are of Health (NIH) physicians, an insulin drip perineal and gluteal abscesses. experienced or comfortable in using was started at 100 units/h that was grad- She was in DKA with a venous pH of the high doses of insulin required. We ually increased to 1,000 units/h on the 6.95, partial pressure CO2 of 17 mmHg, describe aggressive management of first day and 2,000 units/h on the second and bicarbonate of 4 mmol/L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Insulin Resistance in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Is There a Place for Quaternary Prevention?
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review The Causes of Insulin Resistance in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Is There a Place for Quaternary Prevention? Marta Wolosowicz * , Bartlomiej Lukaszuk and Adrian Chabowski Department of Physiology, Medical University of Bialystok, Mickiewicza 2c Str., 15-222 Bialystok, Poland; [email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (A.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-691-530-998 Received: 5 October 2020; Accepted: 19 November 2020; Published: 21 November 2020 Abstract: Diabetes mellitus was the first non-communicable disease that was recognized by the United Nations as a 21st-century pandemic problem. Recent scientific reports suggest that people with type 1 diabetes mellitus also develop insulin resistance, which is generally considered to be a distinctive feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The causes of insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes mellitus were explored, but there was a lack of publications that connected the risk factors of insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes mellitus with the proposition of repair mechanisms that are offered by quaternary prevention. Toward this end, the present review is an attempt to combine the previous reports on the causes of insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes mellitus and a brief review of quaternary prevention. The destructive effect of insulin resistance on many physiological processes that predisposes the individual to chronic diabetes complications creates an urgent need to introduce effective therapeutic methods for preventing the development and progression of this pathology. Keywords: type 1 diabetes; insulin resistance; quaternary prevention; metformin; screening; diagnosis; risk factors; multidimensional approach 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Insulin Resistance
    ( ISSN 2380-548X ) SciForschenOpen HUB for Scientific Research International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders Review Article Volume: 1.4 Open Access Received date: 08 October 2015; Accepted date: Guideline for the Management of Insulin 27 October 2015; Published date: 30 October 2015. Resistance Citation: Govers E, Slof E, Verkoelen H, Ten Hoor-Aukema NM, KDOO (2015) Guideline for the Management of Insulin Resistance. Int J Endocrinol Govers E1, Slof E2, Verkoelen H3, Ten Hoor-Aukema NM4 and Knowledge Centre Metab Disord 1(4): doi http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2380- for Dietitians for Prevention and Management of Overweight and Obesity (KDOO) 548X.115 1 Chair to ESDN Obesity of the European Federation of Associations of Dietitians (EFAD), Primary Care Copyright: © 2015 Govers E, et al. This is an Dietitian to Amstelring, Institution for Primary Care, The Netherlands open-access article distributed under the terms 2 Primary care dietitian to EetOké, Member of KDOO board, Scientific Advisor for Atkins International, of the Creative Commons Attribution License, The Netherlands which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and 3 Dietitian to Prima-Vita, Member of KDOO, The Netherlands reproduction in any medium, provided the original 4 Primary Care Dietitian to Bon Appetit Dietitians, The Netherlands author and source are credited. *Corresponding author: Elisabeth Govers, Cornelis van Alkemadestraat 16, 1065 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The successes of interventions to obtain weight loss and prevent relapse are limited. Moreover, comorbidities like type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and gout, have so far been treated as separate diseases, although mounting evidence shows that these morbidities are consequences of the failing metabolism due to insulin resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • IGF-I Treatment of Insulin Resistance
    European Journal of Endocrinology (2007) 157 S51–S56 ISSN 0804-4643 IGF-I treatment of insulin resistance Anna McDonald, Rachel M Williams, Fiona M Regan, Robert K Semple1 and David B Dunger University of Cambridge, Department of Paediatrics, Box 116, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK and 1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Box 232, Addenbrooks Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK (Correspondence should be addressed to D B Dunger; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Severe insulin resistance resulting from known or putative genetic defects affecting the insulin receptor or post-insulin receptor signalling represents a clinical spectrum ranging from Donohue’s and Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome, where the genetic defect is identified, through to the milder phenotype of type A insulin resistance, where a genetic defect can only be detected in around 10% of cases. Paradoxically, subjects with these conditions may present with hypoglycaemia due to mismatch of post-prandial glucose excursion and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia. Ultimately, treatment with insulin and insulin sensitisers will be unsuccessful and subjects may succumb to diabetes or its complications. Recombinant human IGF-I alone or combined with its binding protein (IGFBP-3) provides an alternative therapy as IGF-I receptor shares structural and functional homology with the insulin receptor and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) therapy could improve glucose disposal by signalling through the IGF-I receptor, whilst reducing the adverse effects of high insulin concentrations. There are also data which indicate that IGF-I signalling through the IGF-I receptor on the pancreatic b-cell may be important in maintaining insulin secretion.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIFICATION of DIABETES MELLITUS 2019 Classification of Diabetes Mellitus ISBN 978-92-4-151570-2
    CLASSIFICATION OF DIABETES MELLITUS 2019 Classification of diabetes mellitus ISBN 978-92-4-151570-2 © World Health Organization 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. Classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence:CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris. Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.
    [Show full text]