FOIR-Coongie-Road-Survey-Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Painted Snippets the Newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project
Painted Snippets The newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project Volume 4 May 2012 A stunning female bathes herself, unperturbed by onlookers at Canberra’s Kelly Swamp. Photo: David Stowe None of us would have predicted the events Just add water which unfolded in the months that followed, It’s been an eventful 2 years since our last when one-in-10-year rains extended south edition of Painted Snippets hit the stands. After from the tropics and caused extensive flooding the 2008/09 summer, our concerns for the throughout 4 states, rejuvenating wetland and species were reinforced by a return of just 11 river systems throughout the Murray Darling, individuals observed across Australia. Bulloo-Bancannia and Lake Eyre Basins as well as across the Top End. Once the floods began to subside, observers Contents ventured out, discovering ephemeral wetlands which, in some cases, hadn’t been inundated in 1. Just Add Water 20 years! Soon enough, Australian Painted 2. Around the soggy grounds Snipe (APS) records started rolling in. With 5. Déjà vu 2005 conditions remaining wet throughout the year 6. A bird in the hand and Tropical Cyclone Yasi providing similar flows in early 2011, the last 2 years have seen 7. BirdLife Australia Wetland Birds Project over 400 individual APS1 recorded (Fig 2)across 8. iBis for your iPhone every state and territory except Tasmania, in 8. APS EPBC listing upgrade what has been true testament to the 9. Moolort Plains wetland project opportunistic nature of this enigmatic wader. 9. APS surveys. How to contribute to species conservation. -
Interdunal Wetland
Interdunal Wetland (Global Rank G2?; State Rank S1) Overview: Distribution, Abundance, Environmental Setting, Ecological Processes !( !( !( Interdunal Wetland is an extremely rare natural community in Wisconsin, where it is restricted to a small number of sites on Great Lakes coasts. By definition, these commu- nities are associated with and dependent on Great Lakes dunes in which wind, water, or currents have created hollows between the dunes or beach ridges that intersect the water !( table. Such sites are colonized by a distinctive assemblage of wetland plants, which include habitat specialists of high con- servation significance because of their rarity, habitat needs, or limited distribution. All Wisconsin occurrences are small, seldom encompass- !( ing more than 10 acres. Great Lakes shoreline environments are extremely dynamic, and interdunal wetlands will shift in !( size, shape, and location as the dunes themselves move. As long as the shoreline processes of sand movement, deposi- tion, and erosion remain functional, new interdunal wetlands will be created as others are destroyed. On Lake Superior, Interdunal Wetlands are associated with sandspits and baymouth bars, which may support low dunes of less than one to several meters in height. The configura- Locations of Interdunal Wetland in Wisconsin. The deeper hues tions of these wetlands may change radically depending on shading the ecological landscape polygons indicate geographic Lake Superior water levels, and the frequency, severity, and areas of greatest abundance. An absence of color indicates that approach direction of major storms. There is at least one Lake the community has not (yet) been documented in that ecological Superior site where human excavations on a sandspit have landscape. -
Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R. -
Management Plan for the South Australian Lake Eyre Basin Fisheries
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LAKE EYRE BASIN FISHERIES Part 1 – Commercial and recreational fisheries Part 2 – Yandruwandha Yawarrawarrka Aboriginal traditional fishery Approved by the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries pursuant to section 44 of the Fisheries Management Act 2007. Hon Gail Gago MLC Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries 1 March 2013 Page 1 of 118 PIRSA Fisheries & Aquaculture (A Division of Primary Industries and Regions South Australia) GPO Box 1625 ADELAIDE SA 5001 www.pir.sa.gov.au/fisheries Tel: (08) 8226 0900 Fax: (08) 8226 0434 © Primary Industries and Regions South Australia 2013 Disclaimer: This management plan has been prepared pursuant to the Fisheries Management Act 2007 (South Australia) for the purpose of the administration of that Act. The Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA (and the Government of South Australia) make no representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this management plan or as to the suitability of that information for any particular purpose. Use of or reliance upon information contained in this management plan is at the sole risk of the user in all things and the Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA (and the Government of South Australia) disclaim any responsibility for that use or reliance and any liability to the user. Copyright Notice: This work is copyright. Copyright in this work is owned by the Government of South Australia. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth), no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without written permission of the Government of South Australia. -
Innamincka Regional Reserve Draft Management Plan 2017
Innamincka Regional Reserve Draft Management Plan 2017 Recognising the cultural and interconnected nature of Innamincka Regional Reserve, and working together towards sustainable land use Your views are important A management plan for the Innamincka Regional Reserve is being prepared to ensure the long term protection of the regional reserve’s natural values and advance spiritual, cultural, social and economic opportunities for the traditional custodians – the Yandruwandha people and the Yawarrawarrka people. The Innamincka Regional Reserve Draft Management Plan is now released for public consultation. Members of the community are encouraged to express their views on the future management of this regional reserve. A final plan will be prepared in response to submissions received on this draft plan. Once prepared, the final plan will be forwarded to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation for consideration, together with a detailed analysis of submissions received. Notice of the adoption of the final plan will be published in the Government Gazette and the final Innamincka Regional Reserve Management Plan will be made available at: www.environment.sa.gov.au/parkmanagement. I encourage you to make a submission on this draft plan. John Schutz Director of National Parks and Wildlife Cultural Sensitivity Warning Aboriginal people are warned that this publication may contain culturally sensitive material. 1 Developing this draft plan This draft management plan was developed by the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR) with advice from the Yandruwandha Yawarrawarrka Parks Advisory Committee. It draws on feedback received in response to a stakeholder workshop and a discussion paper that was released to the public in 2015. -
Management Plan for Ossineke ERA Complex
Management Plan for Ossineke ERA Complex Administrative Information: ERA names o Ossineke Swale ERA, Ossineke Fen ERA and Ossineke Marsh ERA Location o Atlanta FMU, Compartment 84, Alpena Lake Plane MA o T29N, R08E, Sec. 12 and 13; T29N, R09E, Sec. 7 and 18; Sanborn Township of Alpena County Contact information o Plan writer: Richard Barber Ownership o State of Michigan Existing infrastructure/facilities o Ossineke State Forest Campground includes Ossineke and is adjacent to the swale, fen and marsh. o Two forest roads enter the ERA’s. Other documents related to this ERA (pre‐existing plans at a different scale, species specific management/conservation plans, MOU/MOAs with partners, reports with area specific information, etc.) o Ossineke Swale ERA . Natural Community Management Guidance: Interdunal Wetland . MNFI Great Interdunal Wetland Community Abstract . MNFI Element Occurrence Record EOID 18834, Ossineke Swale o Ossineke Marsh ERA . Natural Community Management Guidance: Great Lakes Marsh . MNFI Great Lakes Marsh Community Abstract . MNFI Element Occurrence Record EOID 18835, Ossineke Marsh o Ossineke Fen ERA . Natural Community Management Guidance: Northern Fen . MNFI Northern Fen Community Abstract . MNFI Element Occurrence Record EOID 18836, Ossineke Fen Conservation Values Natural community occurrence for which each ERA is recognized o Ossineke Swale ERA . EO ID 18834, EO RANK BC, Last observed 2011.09.21. This community is ranked S2 due to rarity. Interdunal wetland is a rush, sedge, and shrub dominated wetland situated in depressions within open dunes or between beach ridges along the Great Lakes and possibly other large freshwater lakes, experiencing a fluctuating water table seasonally and yearly in synchrony with lake level changes. -
Ramsar in the Hunter the Ramsar Convention, the First
Ramsar in the Hunter The Ramsar Convention, the first intergovernmental treaty to focus on the environment, was signed in Ramsar, Iran, in 1971, to guide national and international wetland-conservation measures. It was first signed by seven countries and of those Australia was first. The history of how the Ramsar became a reality under the leadership of Dr Luc Hoffman and Sir Peter Scott is well documented and can be easily found. In the same year in the UK, the first wetland centre, Slimbridge, opened near Dursley in Gloucestershire, spearheaded again by Sir Peter Scott, who also played a leading role in the formation of Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF). Many would say the formation of the Convention was ahead of its time since the goals, written mostly in the late 1960s, continue to be relevant today over 50 years later. The Ramsar Convention is unique in a number of other ways: it is the only convention to be focused on a single ecosystem type: and it continues to operate independently rather than under the umbrella of the UN like most other multi-lateral conventions. Worldwide there are over 2400 Ramsar sites in 171 countries. Australia designated the world’s first Ramsar site under the Ramsar Convention – the Cobourg Peninsula, Northern Territory - in 1974 and now has 66 listed Ramsar wetlands, in every state and territory, covering approximately 8.3 million hectares. The Hunter Estuary Wetlands are one of 12 Ramsar sites in NSW and the Shortland Wetlands component is one of only three in NSW that are privately owned and managed. -
A World in Our Backyard
A World in Our Backyard A Wetlands Education and Stewardship Program Distributed by Environmental Media Corporation 1102 11th Street Port Royal, SC 29935-2304 800.368.3382/843.986.9034 843.986.9093 FAX www.envmedia.com New England Interstate \Vater Pollution Control Commission Acknowledgements Written by: Stafford Madison, with Melissa Paly Graphic Design: Sarah Meltzer IUustration: Rebecca Leonard Contributors: Shirley Griffin, Bev Maffei, Cindy Thomashow Field Testing: Antioch New England Graduate School Wetlands Education Project The people who helped shape tbis project ill its early stages are: David Lyons, Jeremy Pirtle, Gus Gomes, Cathy Manwaring, Libby Hurland, Brian Lynn, Leslie Beaulieu, Barbara Waters, Randy Sorenson and Joan Hyde. 7be follotvillg i1zdividuals provided critical review of the fi1Zal draft guide: Ralph Abele, Cleti Cervoni, Bill Decker, Karen Dvornich, Liz Epstein, Alexander Goldowsky, Susan Higgins, Ellie Horowitz, Leo Kenney, Deb Mackie, Neil Maine, Jim Martin, Maria Pirie, Chuck Roth, Nancy Rugo, Matt Schweisberg, Will Snyder, Amanda Stone, Doug Thompson, Kathy Vandiver and Sally Zelinski. Special thanks to: Howard Hencke, lrvil Kear, and Dawn Stolfi for their tireless editing, proofreading, and support throughout the project. Front cover credits: Illustration by: Rebecca Leonard Photograph by: Melissa Paly Permission is given to reproduce portions of this publication for use in educational activities. Additional copies of this guide and videocassette are available from: Environmental Media Center, P.O. Box 1016, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (800) ENV-EDUC I 363-3382 Developed by the New England Interstate Water Pollution Commission Grant funding provided by the U.S. Eo.vironmental Protection Agency- Region I. TABLE oF CoNTENTS Wetlands Education & Stewardship: An Introduction ............................ -
Addressing Change in Wetland Ecological Character
Ramsar Handbooks 4th edition Handbook 19 Addressing change in wetland ecological character About the Convention on Wetlands The Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) is an intergovernmental treaty whose mission is “the conservation and wise use of all wetlands through local, regional and national actions and international cooperation, as a contribution towards achieving sustainable development throughout the world”. As of October 2010, 160 nations have joined the Convention as Contracting Parties, and more than 1900 wetlands around the world, covering over 186 million hectares, have been designated for inclusion in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. What are wetlands? As defined by the Convention, wetlands include a wide variety of habitats such as marshes, peatlands, floodplains, rivers and lakes, and coastal areas such as saltmarshes, mangroves, and seagrass beds, but also coral reefs and other marine areas no deeper than six metres at low tide, as well as human-made wetlands such as waste-water treatment ponds and reservoirs. Copyright © 2010, Ramsar About this series of handbooks Convention Secretariat This series has been prepared by the Secretariat of the Convention Citation: Ramsar Convention th th th th following the 7 , 8 9 , and 10 meetings of the Conference of Secretariat, 2010. Addressing change the Contracting Parties (COP7, COP8, COP9 and COP10) held, in wetland ecological character: respectively, in San José, Costa Rica, in May 1999, Valencia, Spain, Addressing change in the ecological in November 2002, Kampala, Uganda, in November 2005, and character of Ramsar Sites and other Changwon, Republic of Korea, October-November 2008. The wetlands. Ramsar handbooks guidelines on various matters adopted by the Parties at those and for the wise use of wetlands, earlier COPs have been prepared as a series of handbooks to assist 4th edition, vol. -
Malkumba-Coongie Lakes National Park About
<iframe src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-5L9VKK" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden"></iframe> Malkumba-Coongie Lakes National Park About Check the latest Desert Parks Bulletin (https://cdn.environment.sa.gov.au/parks/docs/desert-parks-bulletin- 21092021.pdf) before visiting this park. Malkumba-Coongie Lakes National Park is one of the most spectacular of South Australia's natural attractions. The park is a pristine water world made up of channels, waterholes, lakes, internal deltas, shallow floodplains and interdune corridors and swamps. Motorboats, camp fires, fishing and generators are not permitted in the park, ensuring a genuine wilderness experience. Coongie Lakes is listed as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance (https://www.environment.sa.gov.au/managing-natural-resources/wetlands/Coongie_Lakes). The waterbird diversity is high for an arid wetland and is a significant feeding, resting and breeding site for an enormous number of birds that migrate to the area. The wetland plays host to a diversity of wildlife including fish, reptiles and frogs. It transforms into a breeding ground for an enormous number of migratory birds from around the world. The contrast from sand dunes to vast wetlands is remarkable. The park is a true wilderness for visitors seeking a place of solitude to enjoy nature. Take advantage of the wilderness – camp, canoe, enjoy photography, bushwalk, discover Aboriginal history and generally relax in the calm surrounds of the wetlands. Opening hours Open daily. Fire safety and information Listen to your local area radio station (https://www.cfs.sa.gov.au/public/download.jsp?id=104478) for the latest updates and information on fire safety. -
Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge
MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. PROGRAM FOR CONSIDERATION ON September 9, 2009 A. National Wildlife Refuge System Proposals 1. Tulare Basin Wildlife Management Area 2. Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge 3. Bombay Hook National Wildlife Refuge 4. Silvio 0 . Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge - Pondicherry Division 5. Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge 6. Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge 7. Silvio 0. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge - Mohawk River Division 8. Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge B. North American Wetlands Conservation Act Proposals United States Wetlands Conservation Standard Grant Proposals MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE MIG RA TORY BIRD CONSERVATION COMMISSION Held in Washington, D.C., on June 10, 2009 The Migratory Bird Conservation Commission (Commission) met on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, in the Main Interior Building, Secretary's Conference Room 5160. The following Commission members were present: HON. TOM STRICKLAND, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Department of the Interior, Chairman HON. THAD COCHRAN, Senator from Mississippi HON. BLANCHE LINCOLN, Senator from Arkansas HON. JOHN D. DINGELL, U.S. Representative from Michigan HON. ROBERT J. WITTMAN, U.S. Representative from Virginia HON. ANN BARTUSKA, Acting Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture HON. ROBERT WOOD, Acting Deputy Office Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A representative from Canada was present: MS. CHRISTINA JUTZI, Program Officer, Environment and Energy, Embassy of Canada The following State Ex Officio members were present: MR. STEVE FRIEDMAN, Chief of Real Estate, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, Georgia MR. -
Report Title
Environmental Impact Report Operation of 1 MW Geothermal Power Plant at Innamincka Geodynamics Limited June 2014 Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Current Approvals .............................................................................................. 6 3.0 Proposed Activity and Location ........................................................................ 7 4.0 Operational Changes Since 2008 .................................................................... 13 4.1 Management System Changes ..................................................................................... 13 4.2 Operational Changes ..................................................................................................... 13 4.3 Geothermal Power Generation Process ........................................................................ 13 4.4 Geofluid Management.................................................................................................... 14 4.5 Site Offices, Power Plant and Facilities ......................................................................... 15 4.6 Power Plant Environmental Safeguards and Controls .................................................. 15 4.7 Wastewater Management .............................................................................................. 16 4.8 Power Generation and Energy Supply .......................................................................... 16 4.9 Fuel and Chemical