DOCSLIB.ORG

One-Sound Morphemic Elements in the Base of the Derivational Suffixes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
One-Sound Morphemic Elements in the Base of the Derivational Suffixes Journal of Language and Cultural Education 2017, 5(1), ISSN 1339 - 4584 DOI: 10.1515/jolace - 2017 - 00 1 2 One - sound morphemic elements in the base of the derivational suffixes in Orkhon Inscriptions Aysel Ahmadova ANAS Institute of Linguistics, Azerbaijan [email protected] Abstract In this paper, the origin of Turkic derivational suffixes is discussed. It was noted that there are various approaches to this case, one of them being the theory of grammaticalization which suggests that Turkic derivational suf fixes come from content words, while the other being based on the one - sound morphemic elements that are common to some derivational suffixes. The main one - sound formants in the language of Orkhon Inscriptions that we investigate are the elements - l, - g , an d - m . The element - l occurs both in denominal and deverbal words, whereas the formants - g and - m are registered mostly in deverbal nominal words. Key words: Old Turkic, Orkhon Inscriptions, word - formation, compounding, morphemic elements 1. Introduction There is a common idea in linguistic studies that suffixes were formed by the grammaticalization of the constituents of compound words, i.e. suffixes come from words. For many of the linguists, “today’s morphology is yesterday’s syntax” as Givón asserted ( Hopper 1996: 220). Some of them even assume that there is not a clear boundary between compounding and derivation (Ralli 2010: 59). This insight has been very popular for at least 200 years (Hüning 2014: 580). It is especially popular in turkological studi es. 2. From compounding to derivation: a survey of the myth of grammaticalization Before analyzing the role of grammaticalization in making derivational suffixes in the language of Orkhon Inscriptions, we want to look through the main opinion and theories o n the linguistics phenomenon of grammaticalization in the linguistic literature. The use of the term ‘grammaticalization’ begins with the French linguist Meillet who characterized grammaticalization as the “attribution of a grammatical 200 Journal of Language and Cultural Education 2017, 5(1), ISSN 1339 - 4584 character to a forme rly autonomous word” (Hopper , 1996 , p. 218). In traditional linguistic studies, grammaticalization is a process where words with independent lexical meaning turn into suffixes. However, there are a lot of new opinions on this matter. Some of them, focusing on the non - grammatical functions of l exical or derivational suffixes, treat the phenomenon of grammaticalization as a process of making only grammatical, i.e. inflectional suffixes from words, while the other strongly insists that the borders of grammaticalization should be extended, and the formation of derivational suffixes should also be included to the results of this phenomenon. It has to be noted that it is not the isolated words that turn into affixes, but the constituents of compound words (Hüning , 2014 , p. 585). It means that there sh ould be a corresponding compound word to the derivative one to suggest that the derivational suffix was derived from the particular part of the compound. According to Eckardt, “...grammaticalization is a change where a word with independent content, prefer ably of one of the main lexical categories A, V or N, develops a new use with a comparatively more dependent, more abstract content, changed word class, typically of a functional nature, e.g. auxiliary, modal, functional word or even affix” (Eckardt , p. 1) . It is clear that R.Eckardt do not exclude the formation of derivational suffixes here. A well - known opinion of Kuryłowicz suggests that “grammaticalization consists in the increase of the range of a morpheme from a lexical to a grammatical or from a less grammatical to a more grammatical status, e.g. from a derivative formant to an inflectional one” (Kuryłowicz , 1965 , p. 69). The main focus of this thought is a change from derivational to inflectional suffixes. The linguists who exclude derivational suffi xes from grammaticalization argue that derivational suffixes are not grammatical, but lexical morphemes, because they have special lexical meanings, and they sometimes call this process lexicalization or just avoid using both notions in respect to word for mation (Hüning , 2014 , p. 581, p. 586). However, it should be noted that derivational suffixes do not have a lexical meaning, they merely participate in the formation of a new lexical meaning in the word, i.e. they add a new lexical meaning to a root or a s tem. That’s why they cannot be accepted as lexical morphemes. They are not independent, but bound morphemes. Nevertheless, other scholars accept derivational suffixes as a result of grammaticalization. “Grammaticalization is often characterized as a transi tion (or cline) that includes the change from “syntax/word” to “morphology/affix” as one segment” (Haspelmath , 2011 , p. 343), e.g. Stevens illustrates the clines from lexical item to inflectional affix as the following: Root → afixoid → derivational afix → inlectional afix (Hüning , 2014 , p. 583). 201 Journal of Language and Cultural Education 2017, 5(1), ISSN 1339 - 4584 The thoughts of the linguists on the reasons of grammaticalization also differ. While some of them acknowledge generalization or bleaching as a driving force in grammaticalization, for the other scholars metaph or or metonymy is the main reason of this phenomenon (Eckardt , p. 14). The author of the term described the two processes of grammaticalization; analogy and “the passage of an autonomous word to the role of grammatical element” (Hopper , 1996 , p. 218). Acco rding to Bybee (2003), one striking feature of grammaticization is a dramatic frequency increase, it is a primary contributor to this process, and habituation and repetition are very important for grammaticization. 3. Another approach to the origin of the d erivative suffixes: one - sound morphemic elements As we mentioned above, most linguists agreed that grammaticalization is not a process which occurs in isolated words. It is rather a process of making suffixes from the constituents of compound words. This view could be a key to determine the possibility of grammaticalization process in the language of Orkhon Inscriptions. The investigation of word - formation methods in written monuments and the comparison of several word - formation processes in Orkhon Turkic show that while derivation was the most productive way of word - formation, the number of genuine compound words in these monuments was far less than the ones in the modern Turkic languages. Therefore, it cannot be proved that the large number of suffixes or iginated from few compound words. On the contrary, there are some suffixes similar both in form and in function. They have the same one - sound morphemic elements that correspond to each other. So, it can be assumed that these suffixes originated from these small morphemic elements. The other fact that reduces the possibility of grammaticalization in the derivational suffixes of Turkic languages is the lack of affixoids or enclitics. Affixoid is a “compound constituent with an affix - like behavior which corres ponds to an independent word with aspect to its form, but not with respect to its meaning” (Hüning 2014: 587 - 589). They are categorically marginal affixes or categorically marginal lexemes that have the properties of both affixes and lexemes and had also b een called pseudo - affixes, semi - affixes, semi - words, and confixes (Ralli , 2010 , p. 59 - 60). “The rise of affixoid is a typical case of grammaticalization, content words becoming grammatical morphemes. …semantic change has already taken place, but there is n o formal change yet…” (Booij , 2005 , p. 122). There are very few morphemes that can be accepted as affixoids in Turkic languages, and most of them belong to grammatical categories, not to word formation. However, “…in the literature, the notion of affixoid is central to the discussion of grammaticalization and word formation” (Hüning , 2014 , p. 587). 202 Journal of Language and Cultural Education 2017, 5(1), ISSN 1339 - 4584 One of the main principles of grammaticalization is determined as layering: “…the older layers are not necessarily discarded but may remain to coexist with and i nteract with the newer layer. Grammaticalization does not proceed by eliminating old forms and substituting new ones, but by ‘crowding’ the field with subtly differentiated forms all having approximately the same meaning… the grammaticalized form and its l exical counterpart may coexist” (Hopper , 1996 , p. 230). As we analyze the suffixes that are accepted as the results of grammaticalization in Turkic languages, it can be seen that they do not have corresponding older forms, the compound words that they came from. For example, there is the suffix - l which makes verbs from nominals, such as tüzäl - ‘to be fixed’ from tüz ‘correct’. Even though some turkologists assume that this suffix comes from the auxiliary verb ol - ‘to be’, the forms tüz ol - ‘to be correct’ and tüzäl - ‘to be fixed’ have different meanings. Or according to some linguists, there is a connection between the denominal verb making suffix - la/ - lä and the auxiliary verb elä - ‘to do’. But the verbs formed with the suffix - la such as duzla - ‘to add salt’ does not have the same meaning with the cons truction with elä - like duz elä . The last one may have several meanings: ‘to add salt’ or ‘to turn something into salt’. As it can be seen the second meaning does not correspond to the derivative verb. Besides, all nouns can be used with the verb elä - , whe reas not all of them can take the suffix - la . Eventually, the suffix - daš is considered to be formed with the locative suffix - da and the noun eš ‘mate’. However, while there are such words as yoldaš ‘fellow’, arqadaš ‘friend’, adaš ‘namesake’ in Turkic la nguages, there is not any constructions like yolda eš, arqada eš or adda eš . It confirms that even though the change from independent words or the constituents of compound words into derivational suffixes is possible theoretically, it cannot be proved prac tically.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Old Turkic Statue from Borili, Ulytau Hills, Central Kazakhstan: Issues in Interpretation
    THE METAL AGES AND MEDIEVAL PERIOD DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2018.46.1.059-065 L.N. Ermolenko1, A.I. Soloviev2, and Zh.K. Kurmankulov3 1Kemerovo State University, Krasnaya 6, Kemerovo, 650043, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 3A.K. Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Committee of Science of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Pr. Dostyk 44, Almaty, 050010, Republic of Kazakhstan E-mail: [email protected] An Old Turkic Statue from Borili, Ulytau Hills, Central Kazakhstan: Issues in Interpretation We describe an unusual Old Turkic statue from Borili (Ulytau, Central Kazakhstan), distinguished by a peculiar position of the hands and holding an unusual object––a battle axe instead of a vessel. Stylistic features and possible prototypes among actual battle axes suggest that the statue dates to the 7th to early 8th centuries AD. The composition attests to the sculptor’s familiarity with Sogdian/Iranian art and with that of China. Several interpretations of the statue are possible. The standard version regarding Old Turkic statues erected near stone enclosures is that they represent divine chiefs––patrons of a specifi c group of the population. Certain details carved on the statue indicate an early origin of the image. It is also possible that such statues are semantically similar to those of guardians placed along the “path of the spirits” near tombs of members of the Chinese royal elite. Keywords: Old Turks, statues, Central Kazakhstan, Sogdian art, China, “path of the spirits”, bladed weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Turkic Script
    Old Turkic script The Old Turkic script (also known as variously Göktürk script, Orkhon script, Orkhon-Yenisey script, Turkic runes) is the Old Turkic script alphabet used by the Göktürks and other early Turkic khanates Type Alphabet during the 8th to 10th centuries to record the Old Turkic language.[1] Languages Old Turkic The script is named after the Orkhon Valley in Mongolia where early Time 6th to 10th centuries 8th-century inscriptions were discovered in an 1889 expedition by period [2] Nikolai Yadrintsev. These Orkhon inscriptions were published by Parent Proto-Sinaitic(?) Vasily Radlov and deciphered by the Danish philologist Vilhelm systems Thomsen in 1893.[3] Phoenician This writing system was later used within the Uyghur Khaganate. Aramaic Additionally, a Yenisei variant is known from 9th-century Yenisei Syriac Kirghiz inscriptions, and it has likely cousins in the Talas Valley of Turkestan and the Old Hungarian alphabet of the 10th century. Sogdian or Words were usually written from right to left. Kharosthi (disputed) Contents Old Turkic script Origins Child Old Hungarian Corpus systems Table of characters Direction Right-to-left Vowels ISO 15924 Orkh, 175 Consonants Unicode Old Turkic Variants alias Unicode Unicode U+10C00–U+10C4F range See also (https://www.unicode. org/charts/PDF/U10C Notes 00.pdf) References External links Origins According to some sources, Orkhon script is derived from variants of the Aramaic alphabet,[4][5][6] in particular via the Pahlavi and Sogdian alphabets of Persia,[7][8] or possibly via Kharosthi used to write Sanskrit (cf. the inscription at Issyk kurgan). Vilhelm Thomsen (1893) connected the script to the reports of Chinese account (Records of the Grand Historian, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Gokturk Cultural History
    HUMANITIES INSTITUTE Richard Dietrich, Ph.D. GOKTURK CULTURAL HISTORY Contents Religion Art Literature RELIGION Overview The GökTürk and Uighur states were characterized by religious diversity and played an important role in the history and development of religions in central Eurasia. In addition, the discovery of numerous religious texts in Old Turkic and artwork with religious subject matter has contributed greatly to modern scholars’ understanding of the history, development, beliefs and practices of Central Asian religions in general and Buddhism and Manichaeism in particular. Religion among the Gök Türk In general, the Gök Türk seem to have followed their ancestral spiritual beliefs. These included the worship of several deities, among them the sky god Tengri, to whom sacrifices of horses and sheep were offered during the fifth month of the year; a goddess associated with the household and fert ility, Umay; and a god of the road, or possibly fate, Yol Tengri. In addition to these major divinities, there were rituals related to cults of fire, earth and water, sacred forests and sacred mountains, as well as elements of ancestor worship and indications of belief in totemic animals, particularly the wolf. Another link between this world and the spirit world was the shaman, who journeyed to the spirit world in a trance in order to cure illness or foretell the future. However, it is clear that as the Gök Türk state grew and came into greater contact with other peoples they were influenced by other religious systems. One clear example of this is the Gök Türk kaghan Taghpar (or Taspar, r.
    [Show full text]
  • KÜL TİGİN YAZITININ ÇİNCE VE TÜRKÇE METİNLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMASI* Tuba YALI
    Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi Sayı: 2/4 2013 s. 27-47, TÜRKİYE International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education Volume 2/4 2013 p. 27-47, TURKEY BİR DÖNEMİN İKİ FARKLI ANLATIMI – KÜL TİGİN YAZITININ ÇİNCE VE TÜRKÇE METİNLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMASI Tuba YALINKILIÇ Özet Orhun yazıtlarında, bütün Türkologların üzerinde hassasiyetle durduğu bir Köktürkçe metin, bir de akademisyenlerin yeterince irdelemediği Çince metin bulunmaktadır. Her ne kadar Bilge Tonyukuk yazıtları öz bir Türkçe ile yazılmış, Köktürk Devleti tarafından dikilmiş, yine Köktürk Devleti’nin merkezinde bulunan Kül Tigin yazıtı ve Bilge Kağan yazıtının ön yüzü Tang Hanedanlığı tarafından yazdırılmış ve hatta Tang Hanedanlığı sanatçılarına inşa ettirilmiş olsa da yazıtlar dış görüntüsü itibarıyla tamamen Çin tarzındadır ve yazıtların üzerindeki Köktürkçe metinler Türkler tarafından eklenmiştir. Kül Tigin yazıtının Çince metnini Xuan Zong bizzat kendisi, Bilge Kağan yazıtının Çince metnini ise Xuan Zong’un emriyle kurmayları yazmıştır. Metinlerde merhum Kül Tigin ve Bilge Kağan yâd edilir. İki yazıtta da Türkçe metinlerde büyük bir kısım tekrar niteliğindedir. Tekrar eden kısım, Bilge Kağan’ın, Kül Tigin’in vefatı üzerine dile getirdiği duygulardan müteşekkildir. Gerek Türkçe olsun gerek Çince, her metin Tang Hanedanlığı ve Köktürk Devleti ilişkileri tarihinden bahseder. Fakat farklı olarak, Çince metinde Tang Hanedanlığı Türklerin dost ve dürüst olduklarını ifade ederken, Türkçe metinde ise Tang Hanedanlığı’nın Türklerin tarihte ve gerçekte esas düşmanı oldukları dile getirilir. Özellikle Köktürk Devleti’nin gerilemesinin nedeni olarak Tang Hanedanlığı gösterilir. Tang ve Türk ilişkilerinin, aynı dönemin tarihi nasıl olur da bu denli farklı iki yoruma sahiptir? Araştırmalar göstermektedir ki Tang ve Türklerin aynı tarihe dair iki farklı yorumu, tarihin gerçeklerden uzaklaşmasına neden olmuştur, hiçbirinin de maksadı tarihî gerçekleri anlatmak değildir.
    [Show full text]
  • Gokturk Literature
    HUMANITIES INSTITUTE Richard Dietrich, Ph.D. GOKTURK LITERATURE Overview The period of the Gök Türk empires and the Uighur states witnessed the birth of Turkic literature, although much the earliest stages of Turkic literature remains a mystery. Nonetheless, from the earliest examples dating from the Second Gök Türk Empire through the Uighur Kingdom of Qocho, a wide variety of works were written using several scripts in the Old Turkic and closely related Old Uighur languages. Gök Türk Literature The vast majority of writings that have survived from the period of the Second Gök Türk Empire are inscriptions, the most famous of which are the Orkhon inscriptions, discovered in the Orkhon Valley in the late 19th century. These inscriptions were carved on two large stone monuments in the 8th century in honor of two rulers, Kul Tigin and Bilge Kaghan. Other long, important inscriptions were found further east, the Tonyukuk (or Bain Tsokto) inscriptions on two stelae. These monuments were erected by Tonyukuk, advisor to four different kaghans, himself in the early 8th century and pre-date the Orkhon inscriptions. A number of other shorter, less complete inscriptions, as well as graffiti and some short inscriptions on pottery have also been found not only in the Orkhon region, but also in the Yenisei region, the Altai Mountains, and in the vicinity of Talas. These monuments contain a variety of information - the early history of the Gök Türks, the deeds of those who had the monuments made, information on relations with other states, and advice to future rulers. The phrasing of the inscriptions has led some scholars to believe that they are a reflection of a long tradition of oral epics, and one renowned scholar of Central Asia, Christopher I.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Science Journal 2014;11(4S) Http
    Life Science Journal 2014;11(4s) http://www.lifesciencesite.com The role of historic-linguistic factor in development of Turkic civilization in meddle ages Yermekova Tynyshtyk Nurdauletovna1, Odanova Sagira Amangeldiyevna1, Issabekova Uldar Keldibekovna2, Abdirassilova Gulmira Kalybaevna1,3 1Kazakh State Women’s Teacher Training University, 050000, 99, str. Aiteke Bi, Almaty, Kazakhstan 2Turkic academy, 010000 Kazakhstan, Astana str. Tauelsizdik ,57 3The Republic of Turkey University Niyde, 050000 99, str. Aiteke Bi, Almaty, 050000, Kazakhstan Abstract. The process of world globalization requires Turkic-speaking nations of common root to unite in social- economy, cultural-spiritual points. Unification of intellectual values of the Turkic world will roll general Turkic mind and being, consolidate spiritual balance and historical integrity between Turkic nations, raise social-cultural potential of modern Turkic nations, strengthen historical roots, and justify special place of the Turkic civilization among human civilization. Additionally, if we don’t hold historical root of Kazakh nationin the situation of encountering of international civilizations there is a risk of spiritual-cultural development’s going wrong way. There are nations who couldn’t follow caravan of time and step into new era with the rest of the world. This worldwide process which can have good or bad influence on the future of our independent country requires us to be exceptionally responsible for every action related to our nation. The independence of our country gives us opportunity to restudy common cultural heritage of Turkic nations, as well as to know its true nature, use them for the benefit of nation, reconsider and analyzespiritual values based on those relics.
    [Show full text]
  • Tengri - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    טנג`רי تنغري تنگری تنگری Tengri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengri Tengri From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Tengri (Old Turkic: ; Modern Turkish: Tanrı; Proto-Turkic * te ŋri / *ta ŋrɨ; Mongolian script: I!KX , Tngri ; Modern Mongolian: Тэнгэр , Tenger ), is one of the names for the primary chief deity since the early Turkic (Xiongnu, Hunnic, Bulgar) and Mongolic (Xianbei) peoples. Worship of Tengri is Tengrism. The core beings in Tengrism are Sky-Father (Tengri/Tenger Etseg) and Earth Mother (Eje/Gazar Eej). It involves shamanism, animism, totemism and ancestor worship. Contents 1 Name 2 History 3 Mythology 4 Placenames 5 Modern revival 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External links Name The oldest form of the name is recorded in Chinese annals from the 4th century BC, describing the beliefs of the Xiongnu. It takes the form 撑犁 /Cheng-li , which is hypothesized to be a Chinese transcription of Tängri . (The Proto-Turkic form of the word has been reconstructed as *Te ŋri or [1] *Ta ŋrɨ.) Alternatively, a reconstructed Altaic etymology from *T`a ŋgiri Spelling of tengri in the Old ("oath" or "god") would emphasize the god's divinity rather than his domain Turkic script (written from right over the sky. [2] to left, as t² ṅr²i ) The Turkic form, Tengri , is attested in the 11th century by Mahmud al-Kashgari. In modern Turkish, the derived word " Tanrı " is used as the generic word for "god", or for the Abrahamic God, and is used today by Turkish people to refer to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks on the Term Balbal of Ancient Turks
    Cihannüma Tarih ve Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi Sayı IV/1 – Temmuz 2018, 1-18 SOME REMARKS ON THE TERM BALBAL OF ANCIENT TURKS Anıl Yılmaz* Abstract Two important concept related to burial customs, evolved in the belief of Turkic tribes in Early Medieval Ages. The first is inhumation that anyone dies in the steppe as anywhere else in the world, have to bury somehow. The second is their cultic (memorial) sites; the structures built as an act of recalling in honor of those who have died. Archaeological and historical sources confirm that these cultic constructions were built mainly for representatives of the aristocrats. There are two different type of cultic sites in the steppe: The ones built for Kaghans (and their family members) are more complicated than the ones built for the Beghs (Lord, head of the tribe). Those built for the Beghs (and their families) are more common in the Steppe. A statue was placed in the east section of a square area made of slab stones and has a single stone line extending through east. Each stone in this line is called balbal. Different views exist among the researchers regarding the purpose of these stones, although many of them agree that each stone symbolizes the enemy killed by the buried in his lifetime. Despite this, there are uncertainties regarding the purpose and functions of these line of stone. In this article, our inquiry focus on this confusion about the meaning of the concept and propose the probable function according to historical, archaeological and social data overlooked by researchers. Keywords: Balbal, non-anthropomorphic stele, Turkic Khaganate, cultic site, Eurasian nomads Gök Türklerin Balbal Terimi Üzerine Bazı Notlar Öz Erken Ortaçağ’da, Türklerin gömü adetleri arasında iki farklı gelenek gelişti: İlki, dünyanın herhangi başka bir yerinde olduğu gibi, ölen birisinin kendi kültür ve geleneklerine göre toprak altındaki ebedi istirahatgâhına bırakılmasıdır.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Complexity in Nomadic Empires of Inner Asia
    Political Complexity in Nomadic Empires of Inner Asia Sergey A. Vasyutin Kemerovo State University ABSTRACT The nomadic empires of Inner Asia are a unique historical phenomenon. Large mountain and steppe territories allowed hundreds of thousands of nomadic families to pursue their economic activities, creating the condi- tions that led to their integration into big imperial communities. The long border in the South with empire-civilization and world-system center China was one of the major ‘challenges’ for steppe people, the ‘answer’ to which was often the creation of semi-peripheral imperial polities, as only the common military capacity of the Inner Asia stockbreeders guaranteed them at least temporary military and political equality and even supremacy during periods of weakening of the Middle Kingdom. The established opin- ion on the similarity of the nomadic empires in this region is mostly the result of a long period of research on nomadic economies, social and polit- ical structures, and the relations between nomads and China (evolutionism, positivism, Marxism). In the last few decades, the concept of multi-linearity (non-linearity) of sociogenesis and politogenesis has been applied to this field of study, allowing us to focus on the peculiarities of the Inner Asia nomadic empires, creating a solution to the old issues surrounding the na- ture of the power systems among nomads, the existence or absence of state- hood, and the typology of imperial structures according to their level of complexity. INTRODUCTION The issues concerning the characteristics of political regimes of medieval nomadic empires have provoked fierce debates among researchers and have become especially important during the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relations Between the Tang Dynasty and the Gök Turks and Did It Lead to Turkish Western Migration? Qihan Long Royal Holloway University of London
    2019 International Conference on Cultural Studies, Tourism and Social Sciences (CSTSS 2019) The Relations between the Tang Dynasty and the Gök Turks and Did It Lead to Turkish Western Migration? Qihan Long Royal Holloway University of London Keywords: history, turkish western migration, Chinese dynasty. Abstract. By the early seventh century, the Göktürks had become the biggest threat to the Celestial Dynasty (China ) since the days of the Xiongnu empire. According to the Old Book of Tang, the primary document of the Tang dynasty, “the Göktürks held a large standing army over one million soldiers. The strength of northern barbarian was unprecedented”. The Göktürks had become a threat to China since the previous dynasties. Before the Tang dynasty was established, the Göktürks, just like the Roman empire once did, was split into two parts: the eastern Göktürks and the western Göktürks; however, both parts of the Göktürks were still strong enough to threaten the newly established Chinese dynasty. When Emperor Gaozu started the uprising, the Tang dynasty made an alliance with the Göktürks. In 630, the lands of the eastern Göktürks were annexed by the Tang dynasty. Just decades later, the western Göktürks fell under Tang attack. The Tang dynasty established protectorates in the land of former Göktürks empire. The battles and relationship between the Turks and Tang dynasty will be explored in order to understand how the once powerful Turkic empire collapsed both internally and externally and why the Turks eventually migrated westward. It will be argued that the Tang empire’s military conquest of Göktürks eventually led to the Turkic westward migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Kül Tigin Yaziti'nin Güneydoğu Yüzünde Geçen “Tuygun
    Türk Dünyası Dil VE Edebiy at Dergisi Tur kish Wo rl d Jo urn al of Language and Literature Sayı/Issue: 49 (Bahar/Spring 2020) - Ankara, TÜRKİYE Araştırma Makalesi / Research Paper KÜL TİGİN YAZITI’NIN GÜNEYDOĞU YÜZÜNDE GEÇEN “TUYGUN” SÖZCÜĞÜ ÜZERİNE Âdem AYDEMİR* Öz Göktürk Yazıtları’nın Vilhelm Thomsen ve Wilhelm Radloff ile başlayan okuma ve anlamlandırma çalışmaları günümüze kadar devam etmiş, yerli ve yabancı Türkologlar tarafından müstakil metin neşirleri yapılmış, çeşitli okuma ve anlamlandırma denemeleri gerçekleştirilmiş- tir. Bununla beraber yazıtların Türkiye Türkçesine aktarılması konusunda hâlâ sorunlar bulunmaktadır. Bu makalemizde Kül Tigin Yazıtı’nın güneydoğu yüzünde geçen ‘ıg(a)r ogl(a)n(ı)ñ(ı)zda : t(u)ygun(u)ñ(ı)zda : y(e)gdi : ig(i)dür : (e)rt(i) g(i)z’ cümlesindeki ‘tuygun’ sözcüğünün cümle içinde yüklendiği anlam üzerinde durulacaktır. Nitekim Kül Tigin Yazıtı’nın güneydoğu yüzünde yer alan ‘t(u)ygun(u)ñ(ı)zda’ sözcüğü, alanın uzmanları tarafından farklı okunan, farklı anlamlandırılan sözcüklerdendir. Sözcük, ‘taygun, toygun, ataygun, atıygun’ gibi farklı şekillerde okunmuş, ‘yüksek bir unvan; tay- lar, gençler, çocuklar, oğullar, erkek torunlar’ gibi anlamlar yüklenmiştir. Hâlbuki metnin bağlamına göre burada bulunması gereken sözcük, Eski Türkçe ‘tuygun’; ‘kartal <=> ruh/ can’ sözcüğü olmalıdır. Bu makalemizde hususiyle Kül Tigin yazıtının güneydoğu yüzünde geçen ‘t(u)ygun(u)ñ(ı)zda’ sözcüğü, üzerinde durulmuştur. Öncelikle bu sözcükle ilgili okuma ve anlam denemelerine temas edilecek, ardından Türkçenin tarihî ve çağdaş metinlerinden hareketle görüşlerimiz ortaya konulacaktır. Çalışmayla elde edilen tespitler, değerlendirme ve sonuç Geliş Tarihi/ Date Applied 11.04.2018 Kabul Tarihi/ Date Accepted: 12.02.2020 Makalenin Künyesi: Aydemir, Â.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Environment: Silk Road in the History of Turkic People
    Opción, Año 33, No. 85 (2018): 522-550 ISSN 1012-1587 / ISSNe: 2477-9385 The role of the environment: Silk road in the history of turkic people Aigerim Zhumabayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan [email protected] Bauyrzhan Bozhbanbayev Almaty Academy of Economics and Statistics, Almaty, Kazakhstan [email protected] Aizhan Turgenbayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan [email protected] Arman Aubakir Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan [email protected] Kairat Zhanabayev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan [email protected] Abstract The pathway has been the cause of the development and progress of nations, economic exchange of nations and civilizations throughout history has taken place through roads. Historical and archaeological surveys show that in the past, roads and important ways have been created to connect cities and centers of civilization to the Turkish plateau. The role of the Silk Road as one of the oldest means of communication in cultural communication and tourism development is undeniable. In this paper, attempted to briefly investigate the importance of the Silk Road on the development of its peripheral areas, especially on the Iranian plateau. Keywords: Ancient Turks, Great Silk Road, Art and Crafts, Contact and Typological Relations. Recibido: 10-01-2018 Aceptado: 09-03-2018 523 Aubakir .et al. Opción, Año 34, No. 85 (2018): 522-550 El papel del medio ambiente: La ruta de la seda en la historia del pueblo turco Resumen El camino ha sido la causa del desarrollo y el progreso de las naciones; el intercambio económico de naciones y civilizaciones a lo largo de la historia ha tenido lugar a través de las carreteras.
    [Show full text]