8 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 8 ARCHAEOLOGY AND CULTURAL HERITAGE Summary This chapter assesses the potential impact of the Proposed Project on archaeological and cultural heritage features of the area. The Proposed Project is located within a multi period archaeological landscape. The assessment has been informed by information on the history and development of the area gathered from a wide range of sources, including databases of known heritage assets, an archaeological watching brief undertaken during ground investigation works, a walk-over survey, historic mapping, published documentary sources, archive material and topographic data from a flown LiDAR survey. The assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects on the historic environment arising from the Proposed Project. Construction phase impacts on the setting of listed buildings near to the project would be temporary and would cease on completion of the works. Permanent visual change within the setting of listed buildings associated with the construction of the new Sealing End Compound at Wogden Foot would be minor and adverse but would be offset by the removal of overhead lines within the same view, resulting in net beneficial effects. Permanent direct impacts associated with temporary and permanent construction works would result in negligible effects upon the historic environment for which mitigation measures (watching brief, earthwork survey and condition survey) are specified. 8-1 Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 8.1 Introduction 8.1.1 This chapter of the Environmental Assessment Report assesses the potential impact of the proposed Visual Impact Provision (VIP) Peak District (East) Project (here on referred to as ‘the Proposed Project’) on archaeology and cultural heritage assets during the construction phase (including overhead line (OHL) removal), and operation and decommissioning phases. Measures for mitigation of significant impacts are specified where necessary. Details of the Proposed Project and accompanying figures are contained in Chapter 2 (Project Description) of the Environmental Assessment Report. 8.2 Scope and Methodology Study Area 8.2.1 Impacts upon archaeology and cultural heritage assets are considered within a Study Area (“the Study Area”) comprising a 500m buffer surrounding the Area of Search for Permanent and Temporary Works, which was established for data collection purposes to encompass the maximum extent of all temporary and permanent works associated with the Proposed Project. This Study Area has been used to identify known heritage assets, determine the likely potential for currently unknown heritage assets to be present, and to assess impacts of the Proposed Project upon them. 8.2.2 An Extended Study Area (“the Extended Study Area”) comprising a 5km buffer surrounding the Area of Search for Permanent and Temporary Works has been used for the assessment of visual impacts upon the setting of designated heritage assets arising from the Proposed Project, specifically those associated with the installation of new equipment at the proposed Sealing End Compound (SEC) at Wogden Foot, and the removal of the VIP Subsection of OHL. 8.2.3 The Site Boundary is the boundary of the Proposed Project comprising the Cable Corridor, VIP Subsection, SEC, Temporary Construction Compounds/Lay Down Areas, Temporary Access Tracks, Crane Pads and Overhead Working Platforms. There is the potential for direct physical impact upon heritage assets identified within the Site Boundary. 8.2.4 The Site Boundary, Area of Search for Permanent and Temporary Works, Study Area, Extended Study Area and locations of all known heritage assets considered in the assessment are indicated in Figures 8.1 and 8.2. Establishment of Existing Environment 8.2.5 The term ‘heritage asset’ denotes “a building, monument, site, place, area or landscape positively identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest”.1 Heritage assets may be designated under national legislation or international agreements (e.g. world heritage sites, scheduled monuments, protected wreck sites, listed buildings, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields and conservation areas) or non-designated, recorded on regional historic environment records and other regional and national databases. 8.2.6 Cultural heritage more broadly includes all elements of the historic environment: these are, most tangibly, designated sites, areas and features and their settings, and both designated and non-designated below-ground and above-ground archaeological remains. It also includes intangible aspects which contribute to the 1 NPPF 2019 Glossary 8-2 Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 cultural significance of a place (aesthetic, historic, scientific, social or spiritual value for past, present or future generations), including potentially the place itself, its fabric, setting, use, associations, meanings, records, related places and related objects. 8.2.7 Quantitative and qualitative baseline data, comprising records of designated and non-designated heritage assets alongside a summary of the history and development of the Study Areas, is presented in the Existing Environment (baseline) section below (Section 8.5). The archaeological and historical review enables judgements to be made regarding the archaeological potential of the Proposed Project. Data Sources/Gazetteer 8.2.8 A summary of known archaeological and cultural heritage assets is presented in a gazetteer using information from the data sources listed below (Appendix 8A). All assets within the gazetteer have been allocated a unique reference number prefixed ‘RSK’. The locations of the known heritage assets are indicated in Figure 8.1. 8.2.9 The sources listed in Table 8.1 were consulted to inform the Existing Environment section. Table 8.1: Baseline Data Sources Source Data National Heritage List Designated heritage assets, location and extent: for England (NHLE), • Listed Buildings maintained by Historic • Scheduled Monuments England • Registered Parks and Gardens • Historic Battlefields • Heritage at Risk NB: only those assets within the Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) for the proposed SEC at Wogden Foot and removed infrastructure have been included in the gazetteer. Barnsley Metropolitan • Conservation Areas Borough Council National Record of the • Non-designated heritage assets, location and extent Historic Environment • Previous archaeological events (NRHE), maintained by Historic England South Yorkshire Sites • Non-designated heritage assets, location and extent and Monuments • ‘Grey literature’ resulting from previous Record (SMR), archaeological investigations and interventions maintained by the • Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) data South Yorkshire • Previous archaeological events Archaeology Service 8-3 Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 Source Data Peak District National • Non-designated heritage assets, location and extent Park Authority Historic • ‘Grey literature’ resulting from previous Buildings, Sites and archaeological investigations and interventions Monuments Record • Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) data (HBSMR) • Previous archaeological events Barnsley, Sheffield and • Background information, published and unpublished Manchester Archives sources • Historic maps and plans Online sources and • Background information, published and unpublished publications sources Historic Mapping • Historic Ordnance Survey and pre-Ordnance Survey maps LiDAR (light detection • Detailed topographical information on the Study and ranging) data (see Area, flown for the Proposed Project Appendix 8C) Walkover survey of Observations relating to archaeological potential and each land parcel visual impact: potentially affected by • Setting of designated heritage assets; the Proposed Project • Above-ground, negative earthwork, or structural within the Search Area features; for Permanent and • Soil discolouration, crop or parch marks indicative of Temporary Works subsurface features; • Surface finds; • Evidence of current and previous land use, boundaries, topography and aspect; • Exposed geology and soils; • Watercourses; and • Health and safety considerations for further assessment stages. British Geological • Geological data Survey (BGS) Watching brief during • Intrusive archaeological information geotechnical • Stratigraphic modelling of the Cable Corridor, investigations, specifically with regards to depth of colluvium, undertaken by Pre- presence of truncation or made ground, evidence for Construct Archaeology buried land surfaces or palaeoenvironmental Services Ltd and RSK material, where this may assist determining in 2016 and 2018 (see archaeological significance and development Appendix 8B) impact 8-4 Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 Source Data Ground investigation • Stratigraphic modelling of the Cable Corridor, borehole log data (see specifically with regards to depth of colluvium, Appendix 8B) presence of truncation or made ground, evidence for buried land surfaces or palaeoenvironmental material, where this may assist determining archaeological significance and development impact Walkover Survey 8.2.10 The Cable Corridor,
Recommended publications
  • 25A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    25A bus time schedule & line map 25A Holmƒrth <-> Penistone View In Website Mode The 25A bus line (Holmƒrth <-> Penistone) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Holmƒrth <-> Penistone: 9:12 AM (2) Penistone <-> Holmƒrth: 1:45 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 25A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 25A bus arriving. Direction: Holmƒrth <-> Penistone 25A bus Time Schedule 44 stops Holmƒrth <-> Penistone Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 9:12 AM Bus Station Stand D, Holmƒrth Stable Court, Holme Valley Civil Parish Tuesday 9:12 AM Dunford Road Phoenix Centre, Holmƒrth Wednesday 9:12 AM Dunford Road Well Hill Rd, Holmƒrth Thursday 9:12 AM 71 Dunford Road, Holme Valley Civil Parish Friday 9:12 AM Dunford Road Underbank Old Rd, Holmƒrth Saturday Not Operational Attourney Court, Holme Valley Civil Parish Dunford Road Cross Gate Rd, Hade Edge Dunford Road Longley Farm, Hade Edge 25A bus Info Direction: Holmƒrth <-> Penistone Dunford Road Bay Horse Ph, Hade Edge Stops: 44 Trip Duration: 33 min Dunford Road Greave Rd, Hade Edge Line Summary: Bus Station Stand D, Holmƒrth, Dunford Road Phoenix Centre, Holmƒrth, Dunford Dunford Road Round Close Rd, Hade Edge Road Well Hill Rd, Holmƒrth, Dunford Road Underbank Old Rd, Holmƒrth, Dunford Road Cross Dunford Road/Flight Hill, Harden Gate Rd, Hade Edge, Dunford Road Longley Farm, Hade Edge, Dunford Road Bay Horse Ph, Hade Edge, Dunford Road Greave Rd, Hade Edge, Dunford Road Dunford Road/Harden, Harden Round Close Rd, Hade
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in Huddersfield 1990
    HßWC, Huddersfield Birdwatchers' Club Birds in Huddersfield 1990 ANNUAL REPORT 102-4 ADDITIONS TO 1990 REPORT GARGANEY Anas querquedaula Blackmoorfoot Res. A pair were present on 30th March. (MLD et ai) RED-BREASTED MERGANSER Mergus senator Ringstone Edge Res. 2 on 21 st October (NC) RUDDY DUCK Oxyura jamaicensis Blackmoorfoot Res. 4 males and 3 females on 30th April (MLD) MERLIN Falco columbarius Blackmoorfoot Res. 1 on 30th July and 13th August. KNOT Calidris canutus Blackmoorfoot Res. 1 in summer plumage on 19th July (MLD et al). GLAUCOUS GULL Larus hyperboreus Blackmoorfoot Res. 1 adult on 4th March (MLD, JMP, JP). KITTIWAKE Rissa tridactyla Blackmoorfoot Res. 1 immature on 14th March and an adult on 23rd April. The revised total for species seen in the area in 1990 is 172. BIRDS IN HUDDERSFIELD 1990 Report of Huddersfield Birdwatchers' Club CONTENTS Front Cover Map of the Club Area Page 2 Presidents Report for 1990 3 Field Trips in 1990 - David Butterfield 9 Introduction to the Classified List 10 Notes on the Classified List 11 Classified List 50 List of Contributors 51 Ringing Report 54 Local Retraps and Recoveries 55 Ring Total List 1990 56 Club Officials for 1991 ILLUSTRATION Front Cover Black Tern - Stuart Brocklehurst PRESIDENT'S RETORT 1990 proved to be a time for change on our committee, with further changes envisaged in 1991 all of which will undoubtedly bear fruit in future years. Brian Armitage, who had held office in various capacities in all but two years since 1977, had already resigned his post as secretary, and was replaced by Lynn Stanley, whose first year was certainly not an easy one.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Brook Hill Lane, Dunford Bridge, Barnsley, Sheffield
    2019/1013 Applicant: National Grid Description: Planning application for National Grid's Visual Impact Provision (VIP) project involving the following works:1) Construction of a new sealing end compound, including permanent access; 2) Construction of a temporary haul road from Brook Hill Lane including widened bellmouth; 3) Construction of a temporary Trans Pennine Trail Diversion to be used for approximately 12 - 18 months; following construction approximately 410m of said diversion surface would be retained permanently; and 4) Erection of two bridges (one temporary and one permanent) along the Trans Pennine Trail diversion Site Address: Land off Brook Hill Lane, Dunford Bridge, Barnsley, Sheffield Site Description The site stretches from Dunford Bridge in the Peak District National Park to Wogden Foot LWS approximately 1.8km to the east. With the exception of the sealing end compounds at either end, the site is linear and broadly follows the route of the Trans Pennine Trail (TPT). At Dunford Bridge the site extends to the former rail tunnel entrance and includes the existing sealing end compound located behind properties on Don View. Beyond this is the TPT car park and the TPT itself which is a former rail line running from Dunford Bridge to Penistone; now utilised as a bridleway. The site takes in land adjacent the TPT along which a temporary diverted bridleway route is proposed. In addition, Wogden Foot, a Local Wildlife Site (LWS) located 1.8km to the east is included (in part) as the proposed location of a new sealing end compound; construction access to this from Windle Edge also forms part for the application.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Peakland Guardian Autumn and Winter 2020
    Peak District and South Yorkshire Peakland Guardian Autumn and Winter 2020 Peaklandguardian 1 In this issue… Notes from the CEO 3 Planning reforms – the wrong answers to the wrong questions 4 Planning Sheffield’s future 6 Success for the Loxley Valley 8 Hollin Busk 10 Owlthorpe Fields 10 Doncaster Local Plan 11 Longdendale – the long game 12 Save our Monsal Trail 13 New OfGEM pylon plans 13 Decarbonising transport 14 Hope Valley Climate Action 15 Hayfield’s solar farm project 16 Greener, Better, Faster 17 Party plans for gothic lodge 18 Britannia Mill, Buxworth 18 Hope Cement Works Quarry ©Tomo Thompson Business Sponsor Focus 19 Right to Roam 19 New trustees 20 We have been the same Welcome from the CEO Ethel’s legacy 21 CPRE branch since 1927 but since 2002 we’ve also Welcome to the latest edition of the Peakland Guardian. The articles in this edition New branding and website 21 been known as Friends cover a very broad range of our work over the last 6 months. The Trustees and I are Obituaries 22 of the Peak District. We’re now very grateful for the work that the staff and volunteers have continued to put in, in very Membership update 23 going back to our roots: Same charity. Same passion for our local difficult circumstances, in order to protect the landscapes of the Peak District and South CPRE Peak District and South Yorkshire promotes the countryside. Yorkshire. beauty, tranquility and diversity of the countryside across the Peak District and South Yorkshire. We work to protect and Over the last 6 months, the pandemic has had little impact on our workload, indeed enhance its unique landscapes for everyone to enjoy now Follow us on social we are exceptionally busy at the moment, however the pandemic has stopped almost and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Holme Valley Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) 2021 – 2031 Referendum Plan
    Appendix 4 Holme Valley NDP Referendum Version Note: underlined text followed by a Recommendation number identifies the text amended in response to the Examiner’s Recommendation; underlined text without a Recommendation number identifies typographical errors or up dates to the Plan which Examiner Recommendation 21 allows. Holme Valley Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) 2021 – 2031 Referendum Plan Holme Valley NDP Referendum Plan, July 2021 2 Prepared by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group with assistance from Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary .............................................................................. 6 1.0 Introduction and Background ................................................... 11 2.0 Planning Context for Holme Valley NDP ................................... 16 3.0 Holme Valley NDP Vision and Objectives ................................. 22 4.0 Holme Valley NDP Planning Policies ........................................ 24 4.1 Protecting Local Character ...................................................................... 25 Policy 1: Protecting and Enhancing the Landscape Character of Holme Valley ............ 49 4.2 Protecting and Enhancing Built Character of the Holme Valley and Promoting Quality Design ..................................................................................... 51 Policy 2: Protecting and Enhancing the Built Character of the Holme Valley and Promoting High Quality Design
    [Show full text]
  • Offers in the Region of £160000 Bar House, Dunford Bridge
    Offers in the region of £160,000 Bar House, Dunford Bridge Bar House is a quaint 2 bedroom detached cottage that boasts an idyllic location nestled amongst the open countryside in the small village of Dunford Bridge. The property requires full modernisation to bring it up to its true glory but once complete and perhaps reconfigured would create a stunning chocolate box cottage. The property currently comprises of :- entrance porch, dining kitchen, lounge with inglenook fireplace, versatile reception room/study, bathroom, 2 double bedrooms and an en-suite shower room. Externally the property benefits from having an enclosed garden and parking. The property is serviced by mains drainage and an oil fired central heating system. 38 Huddersfield Road, Holmfirth HD9 3JH t: 01484 683543 e: [email protected] w: wmsykes.co.uk GROUND FLOOR Entrance Porch 6’7” x 3’1” Having a fully glazed door leading into the dining kitchen. Dining Kitchen 14’5” x 11’7” With a window to the front of the property and doorway leading into the lounge. Lounge 21’5” x 14’9” A spacious lounge having an inglenook fireplace and windows to the front and side of the property. An open staircase leads to the first floor and a doorway leads into the reception room at the rear of the property. Reception 11’8” x 6’6” A versatile reception room ideal for use as a home office. Also benefits from additional storage and leading to the ground floor bathroom. wmsykes.co.uk 01484 683543 Barr House, Dunford Bridge, Sheffield, S36 4TF En-suite Shower Room Bathroom 8’1” x 6’6” Having a shower, WC and sink.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnsley Permit Scheme Consultation Report
    Barnsley Permit Scheme Consultation Report 1. Introduction On 12 June 2012 Barnsley MBC successfully introduced the Yorkshire Common Permit Scheme operating on type 0, 1, 2 and traffic sensitive streets. To build on this success and to achieve the benefits set out in the CBA, Barnsley Council intends to change the name of the scheme to the Barnsley Permit Scheme (BPS) and extend the scheme to all streets within its adopted highway network. This report is on the consultation for the Barnsley Permit Scheme. 2. Consultees Barnsley Council identified the relevant consultees and stakeholders whom have an interest in the expansion of the BPS. Details of all of the consultees are attached in Appendix A. Barnsley Council analysed their Street Works Register to identify all Statutory Undertakers that had undertaken any work since the commencement of the New Roads and Street Works Act. Following the same process made for the previous permit scheme consultations, every effort has been made to contact all of these organisations to give them the opportunity to take part in the consultation. In addition, Barnsley Council ensured that the adjacent local authorities were included in the consultee list, as well as organisations such as bus operators, freight organisations and emergency services. Wherever possible, an e-mail address for the consultee was obtained. Where no e-mail address was identified, a postal address was obtained. In total 67 consultees were identified and these were contained within the following groupings: Central Government 2 City Region 1 Emergency Services 3 EToN Provider 1 Government Agency 1 Highway Authority 2 Local Authority 12 Local Authority Group 1 Local Interest Group 4 Parish Councils 16 Transport Authority 2 Utility 21 Utility Company Group 1 3.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Peak District National Park Visitor Survey 2005
    PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK VISITOR SURVEY 2005 Performance Review and Research Service www.peakdistrict.gov.uk Peak District National Park Authority Visitor Survey 2005 Member of the Association of National Park Authorities (ANPA) Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1AE Tel: (01629) 816 200 Text: (01629) 816 319 Fax: (01629) 816 310 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.peakdistrict.gov.uk Your comments and views on this Report are welcomed. Comments and enquiries can be directed to Sonia Davies, Research Officer on 01629 816 242. This report is accessible from our website, located under ‘publications’. We are happy to provide this information in alternative formats on request where reasonable. ii Acknowledgements Grateful thanks to Chatsworth House Estate for allowing us to survey within their grounds; Moors for the Future Project for their contribution towards this survey; and all the casual staff, rangers and office based staff in the Peak District National Park Authority who have helped towards the collection and collation of the information used for this report. iii Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 The Peak District National Park 1 1.2 Background to the survey 1 2. Methodology 2.1 Background to methodology 2 2.2 Location 2 2.3 Dates 3 2.4 Logistics 3 3. Results: 3.1 Number of people 4 3.2 Response rate and confidence limits 4 3.3 Age 7 3.4 Gender 8 3.5 Ethnicity 9 3.6 Economic Activity 11 3.7 Mobility 13 3.8 Group Size 14 3.9 Group Type 14 3.10 Groups with children 16 3.11 Groups with disability 17 3.12
    [Show full text]
  • Holme Valley NDP Examination Report
    HOLME VALLEY NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020 - 2031 SUBMISSION PLAN A Report to Kirklees Council of the Examination into the Holme Valley Neighbourhood Development Plan by Independent Examiner, Peter Biggers BSc Hons MRTPI Argyle Planning Consultancy LTD June 2021 Holme Valley Neighbourhood Development Plan - Examiner’s Report 1 Contents: Page Summary and Overall recommendation 4 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Background Context 6 1.2 Appointment of Independent Examiner 6 1.3 Role of the Independent Examiner 7 2. The Examination Process 8 3. Public Consultation 10 3.1 Background 10 3.2 Holme Valley Neighbourhood Plan Consultation 10 4. Preparation of Plan and Legislative Requirements 11 4.1 Qualifying Body 11 4.2 Plan Area 12 4.3 Plan Period 12 4.4 Excluded Development 12 4.5 Development and Use of Land 12 4.6 Plan Publication Following Submission 13 5. The Basic Conditions 13 5.1 National Policy and Advice 13 5.2 Sustainable Development 13 5.3 General Conformity with the Development Plan 14 5.4 European Union Obligations 14 6. The Neighbourhood Plan Assessment 17 6.0 The General Form of the Plan 17 6.1 Executive Summary, Introduction and Background 18 6.2 Planning Context 19 6.3 Holme Valley NDP Vision and Objectives 20 6.4 Holme Valley NDP Planning Policies 21 6.4.1 Protecting Local Character 21 6.4.2 Conservation Areas and Promoting High Quality Design in New Development 25 6.4.3 Conserving and Enhancing Heritage Assets 28 6.4.4 Design in Town and Local Centres and Public Realm 32 6.4.5 Building Housing for the Future 37 6.4.6 Helping the Economy to Prosper 40 6.4.7 Community Education, Health and Well-being 46 6.4.8 Improving Transport, Accessibility and Local Infrastructure 50 6.4.9 Sustainability and Biodiversity 53 6.4.10 Developer Contributions 57 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnsley Door to Door Information
    Door 2 Door Services in Barnsley the local service that comes to you… Barnsley Dial-a-Ride booking line 01226 730 073 MARCH 2014 Traveline 01709 51 51 51 travelsouthyorkshire.com/door2door Contents The service The service ..................................................3 No matter what age you are, if you find it How do I register? ........................................5 difficult to use standard public transport then Booking ......................................................6 you can apply to use a Door 2 Door service Operating times and fares ...........................12 instead. Shopper Bus timetable ...............................14 Door 2 Door services are designed for people Accessibility ..............................................23 who cannot use standard public transport. Each Contact details ..........................................24 service will pick you up from your home and can take you around your local area and beyond. Door 2 Door is great for meeting new people, “Door 2 Door services are vital for many who making new friends and being able to visit would otherwise be housebound. South places you couldn’t get to before. Yorkshire Integrated Transport Authority is If you want to travel to the town centre or a local proud to support Door 2 Door as a key part of supermarket, Shopper Bus is the best service our transport network.” for you. It offers transport from your home at Cllr Jameson - Chair of the South Yorkshire certain times and on set days. Please see the Integrated Transport Authority timetable on page 14 for details. If you need to travel at a particular time, and to a destination not available on Shopper Bus (for What’s changed? example, if you are visiting a friend in hospital, or travelling to an evening class) then Dial-a- Ride or Community Car services will suit your needs better.
    [Show full text]