BART Hotel Map 21Jun
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
SFO to San Francisco in 45 Minutes for Only $6.55!* in 30 Minutes for Only $5.35!*
Fold in to the middle; outside right Back Panel Front Panel Fold in to the middle; outside left OAK to San Francisco SFO to San Francisco in 45 minutes for only $6.55!* in 30 minutes for only $5.35!* BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) from OAK is fast, easy and BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) provides one of the world’s inexpensive too! Just take the convenient AirBART shuttle Visitors Guide best airport-to-downtown train services. BART takes you bus from OAK to BART to catch the train to downtown San downtown in 30 minutes for only $5.35 one-way or $10.70 Francisco. The entire trip takes about 45 minutes and costs round trip. It’s the fast, easy, inexpensive way to get to only $6.55 one-way or $13.10 round trip. to BART San Francisco. The AirBART shuttle departs every 15 minutes from the The BART station is located in the SFO International Terminal. 3rd curb across from the terminals. When you get off the It’s only a five minute walk from Terminal Three and a shuttle at the Coliseum BART station, buy a round trip BART 10 minute walk from Terminal One. Both terminals have ticket from the ticket machine. Take the escalator up to the Powell Street-Plaza Entrance connecting walkways to the International Terminal. You can westbound platform and board a San Francisco or Daly City also take the free SFO Airtrain to the BART station. bound train. The BART trip to San Francisco takes about 20 minutes. Terminal 2 (under renovation) Gates 40 - 48 Gates 60 - 67 Terminal 3 Terminal 1 Gates 68 - 90 Gates 20 - 36 P Domestic Want to learn about great deals on concerts, plays, Parking museums and other activities during your visit? Go to www.mybart.org to learn about fantastic special offers for BART customers. -
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION March 28, 2017 Agenda ID# 15631
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 March 28, 2017 Agenda ID# 15631 TO PARTIES TO RESOLUTION ST-203 This is the Resolution of the Safety and Enforcement Division. It will be on the April 27, 2017, Commission Meeting agenda. The Commission may act then, or it may postpone action until later. When the Commission acts on the Resolution, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend or modify it, or set it aside and prepare its own decision. Only when the Commission acts does the resolution become binding on the parties. Parties may file comments on the Resolution as provided in Article 14 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules), accessible on the Commission’s website at www.cpuc.ca.gov. Pursuant to Rule 14.3, opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages. Late-submitted comments or reply comments will not be considered. An electronic copy of the comments should be submitted to Colleen Sullivan (email: [email protected]). /s/ ELIZAVETA I. MALASHENKO ELIZAVETA I. MALASHENKO, Director Safety and Enforcement Division SUL:vdl Attachment CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I have by mail this day served a true copy of Draft Resolution ST-203 on all identified parties in this matter as shown on the attached Service List. Dated March 28, 2017, at San Francisco, California. /s/ VIRGINIA D. LAYA Virginia D. Laya NOTICE Parties should notify the Safety Enforcement Division, California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, of any change of address to ensure that they continue to receive documents. -
Russian Hill Neighbors Board Meeting Home of Carol Ann Rogers Monday, August 7, 2017
Russian Hill Neighbors Board Meeting Home of Carol Ann Rogers Monday, August 7, 2017 Attendance • Attended: Bob Bluhm, Lorena Calcagni, Richard Cardello, Gregg Carr, Al Greening, Par Hanji, Joyce Kucharvy, Ian Maddison, Monique Olivier, Matthew Mansfield, Greg Polchow, Lucretia Rauh, Jovanne Reilly, Carol Ann Rogers, Stephen Taber • Absent: Sarah Abbott, Tim Covington, Phoebe Douglass, Helen Doyle, Traci Jacquier, Judy Junghans, Mike Moylan, Tina Moylan, Laurie Petipas, Julia Strzesieski, Sarah Taber, Christine Welland ***************************************************************************** Thank you to Carol Ann for hosting the Board meeting and to Jovanne Reilly for co-hosting. Meeting Called to Order at 7:03pm The meeting was called to order by Carol Ann Rogers. Executive Committee Reports • Vice President’s Report: Carol Ann Rogers o Vice President Rogers volunteered to write the “Letter from the President” for the August 2017 e-blast. The Letter will include thanks to Emily Harrold for her work as President of RHN, address the issue of the proposed medical cannabis dispensary on Polk Street at Filbert, and mention how this is a good time to join the RHN Board. o Vice President Rogers feels this is a good time to contact and meet with Supervisors Peskin and Farrel to get a sense of the issues that are most important during the second half of the year and their sense of whether a moratorium on medical cannabis dispensaries will be passed. Greg Polchow volunteered to accompany Carol Ann and Matthew Mansfield may also be able to join them for certain meetings. o Vice President Rogers reported that Judy has been meeting with DPW about the “South Patch” above the Broadway tunnel. -
Historic and Conservation Districts in San Francisco
SAN FRANCISCO PRESERVATION BULLETIN NO. 10 HISTORIC AND CONSERVATION DISTRICTS IN SAN FRANCISCO HISTORIC DISTRICTS -- INTRODUCTION Over the past thirty-five years, the City and County of San Francisco has designated eleven historic districts and six conservation districts and has recognized approximately 30 districts included in the California Register of Historical Resources, the National Register of Historic Places, or named as National Historic Landmark districts. These districts encompass nationally significant areas such as Civic Center and the Presidio National Park; the City’s first commercial center in Jackson Square; warehouse districts such as the Northeast Waterfront and the South End; and residential areas such as Telegraph Hill, Liberty Hill, Alamo Square, Bush Street-Cottage Row and Webster Street. In general, an historic district is a collection of resources (buildings, structures, sites or objects) that are historically, architecturally and/or culturally significant. As an ensemble, resources in an historic district are worthy of protection because of what they collectively tell us about the past. Often, a limited number of architectural styles and types are represented because an historic district is typically developed around a central theme or period of significance. For instance, the theme for a proposed historic district might be “Late 19th century Victorian housing, designed in the Queen Anne style.” Period of significance refers to the span of time during which significant events and activities occurred within the historic district. Events and associations with historic properties are finite; most resources within an historic district have a clearly definable period of significance. A high percentage of buildings located within districts contribute to the understanding of a neighborhood’s or area’s evolution and development through integrity. -
SPR Asilomar Newletter APRIL 2010
41st Annual SPR International Meeting June 23-27, 2010 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 6 APRIL 2010 Asilomar Update Local Organizing Most of you who are coming to the conference have registered for the meeting Committee and completed your housing reservations. If you haven’t yet done so, take a few minutes and do so now! There are still a few single and double rooms George Silberschatz, available at Asilomar but they will be gone soon (all the information needed for President NASPR, Chair making reservations is available on the SPR website). As you make your Mary Coombs John Curtis travel plans remember that an early arrival on Wednesday is strongly recom- Len Horowitz mended and it is most convenient to fly into the San Francisco or the San Jose Hanna Levenson airport. Shuttle bus transportation to and from Asilomar is available from those Celeste Schneider airports; advance reservations are advised and can be made using this link: Sanno Zack http://montereyairbus.hudsonltd.net/res?USERIDENTRY=SPRA&LOGON=GO With June rapidly approaching, I’ve received questions about dress/clothing Program Committee and restaurant reservations. Asilomar, like most of California, is a very relaxed place and the style of dress is strictly casual. The weather in June can vary Lynne Angus, President- Elect, Program Council Continued on page two Chair Gary Burlingame Michael Constantino Robert Elliott Russian Hill: An Urban Walker’s Paradise Beatrice Gomez By Len Horowitz Laurie Heatherington Martin Grosse Holtforth Adam Horvath Asilomar, the site of this year’s SPR meeting, is not far from San Francisco. George Silberschatz And San Francisco, one of the most Bernhard Strauss beloved cities in the United States, Henny Westra has earned this love through its heart-captivating charm, warm and welcoming spirit, and superb natural beauty. -
NPS Form 10 900 OMB No. 1024 0018
NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 1-31- 2009) United States Department of the Interior Draft National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Historic name Four Fifty Sutter Building Other names/site number 450 Sutter Building; Medical-Dental Building; Four Fifty Building 2. Location street & number 450 Sutter Street N/A not for publication city of town San Francisco N/A vicinity State California code CA county San Francisco code 075 zip code 94108 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _ nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. -
Weekend SF Caltrain Closure Feb
Weekend SF Caltrain Closure Feb. 22, 2020 – March 29, 2020 San Francisco (4th/King) ZONE st nd to 3rd/20th 22 St 8 1 Daly T 9 City to San Bruno/ BART to Mission/1 Bayshore Arleta So. San Francisco TRANSIT San Bruno OPTIONS to Downtown San Francisco to SFO SFO ZONE Millbrae to San Francisco or East Bay to Daly City Weekend Only Broadway 2 Oakland Coliseum 292 Burlingame BART st San Mateo via SFO Hayward Park Your one-stop phone and to Mission/1 web source for up-to-the 398 Hillsdale minute Bay Area traffic, Fremont/ transit, carpool, bicycling Belmont Warm and parking information Springs BART San Carlos ECR Redwood City Bicycles on Transit Weekend Only ZONE Atherton There will be limited capacity Menlo Park 3 to Daly City for bikes on the buses. ECR Palo Alto California Ave to San Francisco or East Bay San Antonio Mountain View Sunnyvale LEGEND: ZONE Lawrence Red Bold Type - Baby Bullet Station Santa Clara 4 Airport Transfer Station College Park ◊ • Transfer Station San Jose Diridon 181 ◊ Weekday Only Free weekend Shuttle Tamien BART Station Caltrain will NOT provide weekend service to San Francisco or 22nd Street stations February 22, 2020 to March 29, 2020. Trains will terminate at Bayshore Station. Free bus service will be available for Caltrain riders from Bayshore Station to 22nd Street and San Francisco stations. Listed below are some transit options that might work better for you. Connect with BART (bart.gov) at the Use SamTrans Bus Service (Limited Millbrae Transit Center Number of Bikes Allowed) Estimated Travel Time (From Millbrae BART From/To Downtown San Francisco Station): Route 292 (samtrans.com/292) • Approx. -
Agenda and Summary of Outcomes
ICCT Technical Workshop on Zero Emission Vessel Technology San Francisco, 2019 InterContinental Mark Hopkins Hotel San Francisco, California, USA 9-10 July 2019 Goal and Agenda Dan Rutherford, PhD Director, ICCT Marine & Aviation Programs ICCT Technical Workshop on Zero Emission Vessel Technology InterContinental Mark Hopkins Hotel San Francisco, California, USA 9-10 July 2019 Welcome to San Francisco, California! https://traveldigg.com/golden-gate-bridge-san-francisco-the-most-popular-tourist-attractions-in-america/ 3 IMO’s Initial GHG Strategy 4 Workshop Goal Goal: Discuss technology pathways and barriers to zero-emission international shipping to help identify related research, development, and demonstration needs. 5 Workshop Output Output: A workshop summary document that can inform ongoing discussions at the International Maritime Organization on funding for zero- and low- carbon technologies for international shipping. 6 Day 1 Agenda (1/2) Time Activity 9:00-9:30 Registration, coffee/tea and a light breakfast 9:30-9:45 Review of agenda and workshop goals (Dan Rutherford, ICCT) Setting the stage: A proposal to establish a Board to accelerate RDD&D of ZEVs for 9:45-10:00 international shipping (Bryan Wood-Thomas, WSC) Hydrogen, fuel cells, and batteries 10:00-11:00 • Hydrogen co-combustion in ICE (Roy Campe, CMB) • Electric and H2 fuel cell ships in China (Guiyang Ling, Commission Office of Shanghai Port) 11:00-11:15 Coffee/Tea Break Wind-assist: opportunities for existing and new ships 11:15-11:45 • Wind-assist technologies (Jay -
Transit Fact Sheet and Muni Tips With
8x Public Transit Fact 30 Sheet Map 45 FERRY BUILDING BART BART Stations BART/Muni Stations AND AKL GE ID Muni Subway Stations Muni Bus & Rail EMBARCADERO STATION - O F. 49 S. Y BR For route, schedule, 14 BA fare and accessible MONTGOMERY STATION 14x services information T anytime: Call 311 or visit www.sfmta.com POWELL STATION TRANSBAY TERMINAL (AC TRANSIT) N MARKET ST. CIVIC CENTER STATION 30 8x 45 VAN NESS STATION MISSION ST. D x N 14 U CALTRAIN O J R Caltrain to San Jose San to Caltrain 4TH & KING G K ER D SamTrans to S.F. Airport N N U T CHURCH STATION 16TH ST. N CASTRO STATION STATION 14 K T T 49 22ND ST. 14L 48 STATION FOREST HILL STATION 48 24TH ST. STATION 48 J 8x 14x WEST PORTAL MISSION ST. STATION GLEN PARK STATION 14 14x BART BALBOA K PARK 49 STATION 49 54 T 14 54 8x DALY CITY 14L SAN MATEO COUNTY BAYSHORE STATION STATION San Francisco Public Transit Options FACT SHEET AND MUNI ROUTE TIPS Muni bus routes providing alternate, parallel service to BART service within San Francisco are indicated with numbers, while Muni rail lines are indicated with letters. Adult full Muni fare is $2. Youth and Senior/Disabled fare is 75 cents. Exact change or Clipper Cards are required on Muni vehicles; Muni Metro tickets can be purchased at the Metro vend- ing machines in the subway stations for use at subway fare gates. To reach San Francisco International Airport or other peninsula destinations use SamTrans or Caltrain service. -
Theodore Roosevelt Middle School), in Assessor's Parcel Block No. 1061, Lot No
FILE NO. 180003 ORDINANCE NO. 37-19 1 [Planning Code - Landmark Designation - 460 Arguello Boulevard (aka Theodore Roosevelt Middle School)] 2 3 Ordinance amending the Planning Code to designate 460 Arguello Boulevard (aka 4 Theodore Roosevelt Middle School), in Assessor's Parcel Block No. 1061, Lot No. 049, 5 as a Landmark under Article 10 of the Planning Code; affirming the Planning 6 Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and 7 making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, 8 Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority 9 policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. 10 NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Ariai font. Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font. 11 Deletions to Codes are in strikf!through italics Times New Roman font. Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. 12 Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font. Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code 13 subsections or parts of tables. 14 15 Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: 16 Section 1. Findings. 17 (a) CEQA and Land Use Findings. 18 (1) The Planning Department has determined that the proposed Planning Code 19 amendment is subject to a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality 20 Act (California Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq., "CEQA") pursuant to Section 21 15308 of the Guidelines for implementation of the statute for actions by regulatory agencies 22 for protection of the environment (in this case, landmark designation). -
San Francisco 9
300 ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd See also separate subindexes for: 5 EATING P304 6 DRINKING & NIGHTLIFE P306 3 ENTERTAINMENT P307 7 SHOPPING P307 2 SPORTS & ACTIVITIES P308 Index 4 SLEEPING P309 16th Ave Steps 137 A iDS (Acquired immune Bay Area Rapid Transit, see California Historical Society 22nd St Hill 175 Deficiency Syndrome) BART Museum 86 49 Geary 83 264 Bay Bridge 13, 80, 284, 17 Calistoga 231 77 Geary 83 air travel 286-7 Bay Model Visitor Center car travel 286, 289-90 826 Valencia 151 Alamo Square Park 186, 190 (Sausalito) 224 Carnaval 21, 157 1906 Great Quake & Fire Alcatraz 9, 52-5, 8, 52 Bay to Breakers 21, 23 Cartoon Art Museum 85-6 283-4 alleyways 20 beaches 20, 61, 206 Casa Nuestra (St Helena) 1989 Loma Prieta Quake 284 ambulances 293 Beat movement 118, 119, 229 Amtrak 287 122, 131, 262 Castello di Amorosa Angel island 228 Beat Museum 118 (Calistoga) 229-30 A animals 19-20, 24 beer 30, 32, 270 Castro, the 49, 173-82, accommodations 336 Belden Place 93 239-52, see also AP Hotaling Warehouse 82 accommodations 241, 251 Sleeping subindex Aquarium of the Bay 58 Benziger (Glen Ellen) 236 drinking & nightlife 174, Avenues, the 252 Aquatic Park 57 Berkeley 217-20, 218 177, 180-1 Castro, the 251 architecture 19, 191, 279-82, Bernal Heights 171 entertainment 181 Chinatown 248-9 5, 190-1 bicycling 41, 74, 87, 113, 214, food 174, 176-7 Civic Center & the area codes 296 232, 238, 291 highlights 173-4 Tenderloin 243-7 arts 273-5 bike-share program 291 shopping 174, 181-2 Downtown 243-7 Asian Art Museum 81 bisexual travelers 36-7 -
Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.