<<

World in motion Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 Sports Business Group May 2019 A Annual Review of Football Finance 2017 | Section title goes here

The continued revenue growth of the and Football League has contributed to overall revenues in the European football market reaching levels.

B Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Contents

Contents

Foreword 02 Edited by Dan Jones Delivering results worldwide 04 Sub-editor The leading team in the business of sport 06 Matthew Green

Europe’s premier leagues 08 Authors Michael Barnard, Sam Boor, Christopher Winn, Live sport and the FAANGs: Still courting 14 Chris Wood and Izzy Wray

Premier League clubs 16 Sports Business Group Telephone: +44 (0)161 455 8787 Shaping the future of women’s football 22 PO Box 500, 2 Hardman Street, , M60 2AT, UK E-mail: [email protected] Football League clubs 24 www.deloitte.co.uk/sportsbusinessgroup

Player transfers 28 May 2019 Investing in the future 29 Stadia 30

Stadium arcadium 33 Please visit our website at www.deloitte.co.uk/arff to download a copy of the full report Commercial reality 34 and to purchase the Databook.

Our 40 page Databook includes over 8,000 data items on the various topics covered in this report, prepared on the basis of our specialist and long-established methodologies. It is available to purchase for £1,000 from www.deloitte.co.uk/arff

01 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Foreword

World in motion

Welcome to the Annual Review of Football Finance 2019, the destination, including a ‘Sky Walk’ and its own 2017/18 season, as well as an increase in the publication that remains the most comprehensive analysis of microbrewery, as well as a ten-year partnership wages to revenue ratio in the Premier League. with the NFL to be the dedicated home of the the financial trends in, and prospects for, the football industry. NFL in the UK. Given the onus is now on clubs to generate revenue growth from sources other than With regards to commercial revenue, many broadcast revenue, coupled with the higher This 28th edition charts the latest movements The benefited from the Premier League and European clubs are levels of wage spend, it may put downward on the ever fluid football finance landscape. commencement of a new broadcasting deal, looking to continue to utilise and grow their pressure on pre-tax profits from the record Whilst the Premier League retains its leadership which saw a step-change in the league’s global footprint and popularity created in part breaking levels of recent years. in financial terms, the Premier League broadcast revenue. Whilst the Premier through broadcast exposure in order to drive clubs face challenges to continue to deliver League’s closest rivals are seeking to play interest, and more importantly value, from Commendably, in addition to parachute revenue growth and profitability. Meanwhile, catch up with recent growth in their respective their commercial partners. The key to success payments to relegated clubs, each season Championship clubs are increasingly gambling broadcast deals, the 2019/20-2021/22 Premier is connecting with and delivering value to the Premier League provides contributions to reach the top, and strenuous and creative League broadcast rights cycle has seen more their worldwide fanbase. Four Premier League to support the wider football pyramid and efforts are being made by other European marginal net increases as international growth teams are competing in the Premier League various charitable causes. This was about football leagues to enhance their own global compensated for a domestic reduction. For Asian Trophy in in July 2019, and £200m in 2017/18, equivalent to almost 7% of appeal and close the gap to the Premier League. context, it should be remembered that this pre-season friendlies announced to date cover the League’s total central revenues for the year. follows two previous cycles of substantial eight different countries, with and USA Meanwhile, £211m exited the game in payments broadcast revenue growth. being the most popular destinations, owing to by Premier League clubs to agents. You’ve got to hold and give the perceived commercial growth potential in In a Premier League season which saw Therefore, it is imperative for Premier League relatively underdeveloped football markets in As the Premier League and its clubs have Manchester City achieve the widest winning clubs to remain dynamic in the creation of their the world’s two largest economies. enjoyed record revenues, profitability and points margin in history between first and own revenue, with a focus on matchday and investment in recent years, there is increased second place, Premier League clubs were commercial revenues, in order to maintain its A record five teams competing in the UEFA opportunity and pressure to further boost unable to extend their own significant substantial revenue advantage. Champions League helped drive the Premier the future level of support to the wider revenue lead in global football, as the German League clubs’ record revenue in 2017/18 . The football pyramid, charitable donations and Bundesliga narrowed the revenue gap slightly. Hotspur’s new , which lucrative value of this competition to the ‘big six’, good causes. Additional investment in a Nonetheless, the Premier League comfortably opened its doors in April 2019, is the highest as well as the intensely competitive nature of range of initiatives could undoubtedly benefit managed to hold its position as the largest profile example of such dynamism. The stadium the division itself, has resulted in clubs spending communities and enhance football’s role revenue generating league in the world. has been designed and built with a view to more of their revenue on wages to obtain and and position in society. For example, more operating not just as a football stadium for retain the best playing talent. This was clearly investment to provide pitches and facilities 90 minutes, but rather an entertainment evident with two record transfer windows in the for grassroots football, to help develop the

02 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Foreword

women’s game; to promote anti-discrimination improvement in cost control discipline this Express yourself activities; to promote mental health and will make no meaningful impact on the clubs With UEFA stating its ambitions to preserve lifestyle issues; and to support the education recurring heavy losses. and improve competitive balance in football, and betterment of the next generation. some future changes to the regulatory To complete the financial picture of the top four environment and competitions for European divisions of English football, average revenues clubs can be expected. Both UEFA and FIFA Don’t give up the chase were static for League 1 and League 2 clubs, have recently floated ideas with stakeholders Beyond the riches of the Premier League, it was whilst wage costs in 2017/18 compared to about the future of international club a year of records in the Championship, most the previous season were 11% and 9% higher competitions. For the future of football, unenviable, as despite record revenue, record respectively. Across the 72 Football League there is an intriguing mix of factors to be first wage levels (in excess of revenue) resulted in clubs, combined annual wage costs exceeded assessed and addressed by the football bodies record operating losses. Clubs clearly are still £1 billion for the first time in 2017/18. Revenues Given both and Bundesliga have their including the balance between domestic and willing to invest heavily in playing talent and have yet to break that mark. Average operating domestic broadcast rights locked in until international club competitions; changes to wages, in excess of their revenues, chasing the and pre-tax losses of League 1 clubs worsened, 2021/22 and 2020/21 respectively, commercial national team competitions; how to utilise dream of the financial promised land of the skewed by significant losses of clubs relegated growth is key for both leagues. Both are the most favourable slots in the sporting Premier League. from the Championship, while average losses of continuing to develop their international calendar; responding to growing polarisation League 2 clubs were quite stable. The majority footprint in order to lay the foundations for issues; creating incremental value for the Parachute payments received by clubs who of clubs in League 1 and League 2 continue to commercial revenue expansion. The Bundesliga game; providing solidarity mechanisms; and were unable to maintain their position at the be supported by owner contributions. opened an office in New York in 2018, and La promoting popular competitions with exciting top of English football have been a key driver of Liga have now opened nine international offices and meaningful matches. The coming months revenue growth in the Championship in recent in eight countries – including two in China. promise important debates and decisions with years and this was the case again in the 2017/18 Catch me if you can potentially profound impacts on the game, on season. Whilst clubs in receipt of parachute The continued revenue growth of the Premier Despite winning the World Cup, ’s and off the pitch. payments may have an apparent advantage League and Football League has contributed to domestic League was not able to match that over their direct competitors when it comes another year of growth in the overall size of the success off the pitch, with limited revenue to being able to attract, and afford, the best European football market. The 2017/18 season growth coupled with increased wages. ’s Arrivederci on-pitch talent, the league table consistently total got a boost from the 2018 FIFA World Cup new domestic broadcast deal commencing in Finally, I would like to thank my colleagues, shows many clubs are unable to capitalise on being held in , as well as revenue growth 2020/21 will provide a much needed boost in Henry Wong and all those from across the this, perhaps due to legacy issues brought down in all ‘big five’ leagues. revenue for the league. By contrast to France, football community who have helped us compile with them into the division. the Italian domestic league fared somewhat this year’s report. Whilst the Premier League continues to lead the better than its national team, seeing revenue We expect that Championship clubs’ revenue way, and are engaged in ongoing growth outpacing wages. We hope you enjoy this edition. in the 2018/19 season will remain at similar competition to be second in line. Germany levels to that of the 2017/18 season. However, leapfrogged Spain following the commencement This said, it is pressing for both Italian and Dan Jones, Partner with new broadcast rights arrangements of their new four-year broadcast deal. We French clubs to develop their revenue streams. www.deloitte.co.uk/sportsbusinessgroup due to commence in the 2019/20 season, expect Germany to retain their status as the It is unlikely either league will break the which provides a reported 35% increase on second highest revenue generating league €3 billion revenue barrier in the next few years, the value of the current deal, we will then see in the next edition, with La Liga potentially and there is a risk that the gap between them another boost to the revenue of Championship overtaking again in 2019/20. and the top three leagues will continue to grow. clubs. Unfortunately, without accompanying

03 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Delivering results worldwide

Deloitte has a unique focus on the sports sector, led from Bid process support Commercial rights tender the UK and operating across the world. Our experience, Administrative support to the Assistance with the ATP in their bid process to find development and long-standing relationships and understanding of the a new host for the ATP Finals management of a commercial industry mean we bring valuable expertise to any project from 2021. rights tender process. from day one. Consulting services Economic Impact Studies For more than a quarter of a century, across Deloitte are also audit and tax advisers to Assistance to FIA and Economic Impact Studies for over 40 countries, we have worked with more many sports businesses. Formula 1 to support the the five races in the inaugural organisations in sport than any other advisers. development of the FIA 2019 SailGP Championship. Our specialist Sports Business Group at Deloitte For further details on how Deloitte can add F1 Financial Regulations provides services including: value to your project and your business, and supporting regulatory visit our website www.deloitte.co.uk/ framework. • Business planning sportsbusinessgroup and contact us on: • Revenue enhancement and cost control • Market analysis and benchmarking Telephone: +44 (0)161 455 8787 • Strategic review Email: [email protected] • Economic impact studies • Venue feasibility and development • Sports regulation advice • Due diligence • Corporate finance advisory • Business improvement and restructuring • Forensic and dispute services

04 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

05 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

The leading team in the business of sport

Improve your strategy and governance

Optimise your revenues

Deloitte bring experience, We give our clients a Business Economic Strategyinformation, insights andGovernance competitive Restructuring advantage Business Economic Strategy Governanceplanning Restructuringimpact studies review andleading practices to help andby delivering of competitions solutions planning impact studies review and and of competitions developmentour clients to analyse andorganisational to help engage and theircalendar development organisational and calendar design design grow their revenues and fans, grow attendances, profitability. promote their brand, build value from new markets and accelerate growth. Working together with our We help deliver effective clients, Deloitte’s unique governance, strategies, experience, insights, robust competitions and impact evidence-based advice, and analysis for sports credibility in sport helps build organisations to build their a strong case and consensus integrity, credibility, quality, for change amongst key youth player development, stakeholders and enables our popularity and value. clients to positively influence Commercial Market analysis Ticketing and Benchmarking Media rights Commercial Market analysis Ticketing and Benchmarkingdevelopment Media rights and hospitality and best analysis anddevelopment react to their wider and hospitality and best analysisdevelopment strategies practice political, economic developmentand strategies practice social environment.

06

Advice on the Financial and Business and Targeting, Major event Advice on the Financial and Business and Targeting,development Major of eventcommercial venue market acquiring and feasibility, development of commercial venue market acquiringstadia and andfeasibility, due diligence feasibility disposing of a bid support stadia and due diligence feasibility disposingother of a facilitie bids support studies sports business and advisory other facilities studies sports business and advisory services services

Risk Audit and Club licensing Investigatory Sports tax Risk Audit and Club licensing Investigatorymanagemen Sportst compliancetax and cost and dispute advisory management compliance and cost and dispute advisory control services control services regulations regulations Business Economic Strategy Governance Restructuring Business Economic Strategy Governanceplanning Restructuringimpact studies review and and of competitions planning impact studies review and and of competitions development organisational and calendar development organisational and calendar design design

Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Commercial Market analysis Ticketing and Benchmarking Media rights Commercial Market analysis Ticketing and Benchmarkingdevelopment Media rights and hospitality and best analysis development and hospitality and best analysisdevelopment strategies practice development strategies practice

Make informed investment decisions

Ensure financial integrity

Deloitte brings to clients Our clients benefit from an unrivalled deep our expert review, advice understanding of sports’ and reports to manage Advice on the Financial and Business regulatoryand requirements, Targeting,their risks, complyMajor eventwith Advice on the Financial and Business and Targeting, Major event development of commercial venue markethow the business of acquiringstatutory and requirements,feasibility, development of commercial venue market acquiringstadia and andfeasibility, due diligence feasibility disposing of a bid support stadia and due diligence feasibility disposingother of a facilitie bids support studiesports works in practice,sports resolvebusines disputes,s and advisory and other facilities studies sports business and advisory and the wider economic, implement effectiveservices sport services accounting and legal regulations. environment in which a sport operates. Deloitte has an extensive We utilise our experience, track-record of delivering industry knowledge tailored added-value and global networks to services to a wide range provide independent and of investors, owners and trusted advice to help financiers in respect of our clients understand various sports assets the commercial realities around the world such of their proposed as clubs and sports investments, and plan Risk Audit and Club licensing Investigatory Sports tax Risk Audit and Club licensing Investigatorymanagemen Sportst taxcompliance and cost and dispute advisory marketingmanagemen companies.t compliancesuccessfully for the future.and cost and dispute advisory control services control services regulations regulations

07 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Europe’s premier leagues

Europe’s premier leagues

The 2017/18 season saw no let-up in the Chart 1: European football market size – 2016/17 and 2017/18 (€ billion) growth of the European football market, Re-tuning despite early indications that coming ‘Big five’ 4.2 2.4 9% seasons may not deliver the rapid growth 15% European leagues have seen 0.7 0.7 experienced by many of the continent’s 2% 2.8 3% Non ‘big five’ top leagues unprecedented growth over the past 11% major competitions over the past decade. 2.6 decade, driven by the increasing value 9% €28.4bn €25.5bn ‘Big five’ countries’ other of broadcast deals. However, values 2017/18 15.6 2016/17 55% leagues of domestic broadcast deals being 4.9 14.7 European football market 5.3 19% 58% negotiated, or already announced, for The overall size of the European football 19% FIFA, UEFA and National future cycles for certain leagues appear to market continues to increase in revenue terms, Associations show more limited growth, albeit following reaching €28.4 billion for 2017/18. several cycles of substantial growth. Non ‘big five’ other leagues A period of lower domestic growth in the Excluding the impact of FIFA and UEFA’s major Source: Leagues; UEFA; FIFA; Deloitte analysis. biggest European markets may lie ahead. international tournament finals, revenue growth leagues has now been seen in each of the 18 years we As such, the opportunity to drive future have calculated the overall size of the European Along with domestic and European club Nonetheless, challenges to the current FIgrowthFA, UEFA appears and Na totional be in key international football market. With live football remaining one competitions, the success of the Russian- structure of European football have become Asmarkets,sociations where rights values continue to of the most highly sought after entertainment hosted FIFA World Cup in 2018 brought direct more apparent in recent months, with grow. Indeed, international rights values assets for both attendees and broadcasters, as and indirect revenue boosts to the market, continuing reports of new competition ensured that the Premier League saw 8% well as one of social media’s hottest topics, we compounding market growth. formats and entry/participation criteria being growth overall for the cycle beginning in expect this growth to continue. considered for leading clubs. It is natural for 2019/20, despite an 8% decrease in The introduction of UEFA GROW, a dedicated any governing body to consider how changes to domestic value. Whilst this headline market size figure highlights team working to provide strategic assistance their sports’ landscape could be beneficial, but a healthy financial performance and translates to to National Associations and clubs around also to be cautious and undertake significant Both La Liga and the Bundesliga have a cumulative net profit position for those clubs Europe, as well as a third UEFA Club competition assessment before making changes to the identified this area as an opportunity to competing in the ‘big five’ European leagues, from 2021/22 and the development of the way that the most globally-successful sport reduce the substantial gap to the Premier the topics of polarisation, competitive balance UEFA Nations League, are all examples of UEFA operates. League, utilising disruptive strategies with and strengthening the regulatory environment looking to safeguard the financial development local engagement at their heart to remain near the top of the agenda of the key of football in all its member nations and reduce maximise the control, quality, reach and decision makers in European football. the impact of financial polarisation, whilst value of broadcasting their content in encouraging growth. developing football markets.

08 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Europe’s premier leagues

The English Premier League continues to Having seen increases in the value of its Chart 2: ‘Big five’ European league clubs’ revenue – 2017/18 (€m) deliver record revenues whilst Spain’s television broadcast rights in each of the 6,000 La Liga and the German Bundesliga previous two seasons, the 2017/18 season saw 5,440 Matchday continue to hotly contest the race to be the a return to lower, ‘mid-cycle’, growth for 1,473 Matchday 27% World’s second-richest football league. La Liga revenues, which increased 7% (€208m), 5,000 Broadcasting to €3.1 billion primarily due to commercial Broadcasting revenue growth. Sponsorship/Commercial 4,000 3,210 ‘Big five’ European leagues’ revenues 59% Sponsorship/Commercial 3,168 3,073 Having been displaced as Europe’s second- Real Madrid’s success in European competition, 510 Other commercial 3,000 16% 954 richest league by La Liga in 2016/17, the and FC ’s new four-year shirt front 31% Other commercial commencement of new domestic and sponsorship with Rakuten, drove the league’s 872 2,217 28% Note: Commercial revenue is not 1,609 666 1,692 368 international broadcast deals pushed the commercial revenue growth of 14%, as these 2,000 30% disaggregated into ‘sponsorship’ 1,248 52% 342 22% German Bundesliga’s total revenue to almost powerhouse clubs formed a Spanish one-two 39% 1,294 20% and ‘other commercial’ for clubs in €3.2 billion; back ahead of its Spanish rivals at the top of the 2019 Deloitte Football Money 58% England, Spain and . 1,000 791 in 2017/18. League. 757 257 47% 191 14% 538 510 12% 11% Source: Leagues; Deloitte analysis. 17% 17% La Liga (7%) and the Bundesliga (13%) outpaced The struggles of to keep pace with the 0 England Germany Spain Italy France

Premier League revenue growth (6%), as both English, German and Spanish top-tier leagues Average revenue per club (€m) slightly narrowed the gap to the top revenue continued in 2017/18, as revenue increases generating league in the World. of 8% (to €2.2 billion) failed to narrow the 272 176 154 111 85 gap. Despite four (up from three) Italian clubs Average match attendance The Bundesliga’s new four-year media rights featuring in the top 20 of our 2019 Deloitte arrangements contributed to an uplift of Football Money League, not one made the top 38,495 43,879 26,771 23,848 22,575 c.€290m in broadcast revenues, whilst ten for the first time in the report’s history. Stadium utilisation the return of Stuttgart and Hannover 96 to Germany’s top flight, at the expense of Growth in Italy was seen across each 96% 90% 70% 59% 72% Darmstadt and Inglostadt, for the 2017/18 revenue stream with rises delivered by season helped to deliver a boost to attendances, increased commercial revenues reported and subsequently matchday revenues, which by Internazionale and a boost to broadcast The French top-tier, Ligue 1, continued to The 2017/18 season saw the final year of increased 7% to €538m, after falling in the income as AS Roma received the second- generate the least revenue of Europe’s ‘big five’ UEFA’s previous competition cycle, ahead previous season. highest distribution (€84m) of any European leagues (€1.7 billion), with reductions in both of some changes to entry procedures and club as reward for their progress to the UEFA broadcast and sponsorship revenue being participation requirements. Distributions to These promoted clubs, along with the likes of Champions League semi-finals. offset by increases in matchday and other clubs participating in its two main competitions, Schalke 04 and Eintracht , played key commercial income. PSG dominated once again the Champions League and Europa League, roles in the league achieving steady revenue Impressive matchday revenue growth of 24% in 2017/18, both on and off the field, winning a grew by 2% to total €1.8 billion, of which growth of 4% relating to sponsorship and other was also reported by Italian clubs, primarily third league and cup double in four seasons, €1.2 billion (66%) found its way to clubs in the commercial activities. reflecting significantly increased attendances at and growing their revenues beyond €500m, ‘big five’ leagues. the San Siro for both Milan clubs and AS Roma’s over 20 times that of Troyes, as the most stark additional Champions League fixtures. example of polarisation across the ‘big five’.

09 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Europe’s premier leagues

Whilst 2018/19 marks the beginning of through an attentive, engaged approach to Chart 3: ‘Big five’ European league clubs’ revenue – 2015/16 to 2019/20 (€m) a new UEFA competition rights cycle, international revenue development. 5,940 5,730 6,000 delivering a c.40% increase in distributions 5,440 England 5,301 to the continent’s elite clubs, many leagues Spain 4,865 are considering their future strategies, as La Liga is also looking internationally for future 5,000 the rates of growth provided by traditional growth, and has adopted a similar local office broadcast rights sales could potentially slow. approach to the Bundesliga, but in a greater 3,790 Spain 4,000 3,470 England Italy number of key territories than their German 3,720 3,168 Germany counterpart. 2,865 3,420 England 3,000 2,712 3,073 France Spain 2,793 International broadcast rights sales for the In addition, La Liga’s decision to provide Facebook 2,570 Italy 2,437 2,520 2,217 Germany cycle commencing in 2019/20 have now been with its broadcast rights in the Indian sub- 2,000 2,062 1,917 1,860 1,930 France completed, and the 30% uplift achieved has continent, consideration of games being played 1,643 1,692 Projected offset the slight decline in the value of domestic outside of Spain and its completion of domestic 1,485 rights sales for the same cycle, to ensure values rights sales for the broadcast cycle commencing 1,000 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 will increase by 8% overall – more than enough in 2019/20, at a c.20% uplift, shows its ongoing Source: Leagues; Deloitte analysis. to ensure the Premier League remains Europe’s strength at home and its global ambitions. richest league in the medium term. The overall result of this should see growth of The league must wait until 2020/21 for its next The revenue impact of Real Madrid’s failure to over 10% in broadcast revenues for Serie A, and significant broadcast rights increase, when A change in leadership following Richard retain the UEFA Champions League in 2019 is consolidate the league’s position as the fourth- domestic rights values are set to increase by Scudamore’s 19 years as Chief Executive and likely to be outweighed by commercial revenue highest revenue generating European league. over 55%, to around €1.2 billion per season, latterly, Executive Chairman, as well as changing increases, such as FC Barcelona’s restructured However, many will see this as further ground greater than the current domestic rights value market dynamics, may see the Premier League technical kit deal with Nike and sponsorship lost to what is rapidly becoming a ‘’. of Serie A (€1 billion) and similar to the domestic adapt its approach to ensure continued with Beko, amongst other deals. However, we rights fees currently received by La Liga. revenue growth and maintain its clear revenue do not expect these increases to be enough for The ‘Ronaldo-effect’ on Italian clubs’ revenues will leadership position ahead of its ambitious and La Liga to financially outperform the Bundesliga be seen for the first time in 2018/19 results, with Ligue 1’s long-term approach to the sale of innovative challengers from Germany and Spain in the next edition of this report. his arrival at Juventus having shown early signs broadcast rights has ensured agreements are in the longer term. of increasing attendances, boosting social media in place until the end of the 2023/24 season, Italy followings and delivering strong merchandise providing a greater degree of certainty over Germany Following a drawn-out process, Serie A’s sales – whether this translates into sustained or future revenues than elsewhere in the European With a new four-year broadcast rights cycle domestic live broadcast rights for the three- significant financial impact remains to be seen. football market. having just begun, the focus of revenue growth year cycle commencing in 2018/19 were sold to over the coming seasons will firmly be on Sky Italia and DAZN, delivering limited growth of France Whilst matchday revenues in Ligue 1 have commercial revenues for Bundesliga clubs. c.3% on the preceding cycle. 2018/19 marks the commencement of a new grown consistently in the past three years, a international rights cycle for Ligue 1, delivering an legacy impact of EURO 2016’s infrastructure Both the league and some member clubs The sale of international broadcast rights, to incremental c.€50m per season on the previous developments, the short-term growth of have established overseas offices, as they look IMG, has also not been a smooth process, but is deal with beIN Sport. Despite this increase, the Ligue 1 revenues looks to be dependent on to drive value from untapped international expected to see far stronger growth, providing value of the international rights are less than a the commercial attractiveness and consequent markets through commercial partnerships, an incremental €150m per season across the third of that received by the Bundesliga and just growth of the league’s larger clubs. engagement and activation with new fans and three-year cycle from 2018/19. a quarter of those secured by Serie A.

10 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Europe’s premier leagues

The wages to revenue ratio across the Germany Chart 4: ‘Big five’ European league clubs’ revenue and wage costs – 2016/17 and 2017/18 (€m) ‘big five’ increased to 62% as wages True to form, Bundesliga clubs retained their 6,000 spending outpaced revenue growth, record of having the lowest of the ‘big five’ 5,440 5,301 increasing by 13% to total over €9 billion leagues’ wages to revenue ratios (53%), as wage for the first time. costs grew in line with revenues. 5,000

Aggregate spending increased by c.€200m, as 4,000 England clubs reinvested their additional revenues in 3,168 Premier League clubs continued to spend the attracting and retaining on-field talent. 3,073 3,217 2,793 2,865 3,000 additional revenues received from the latest 2,894 2,217 broadcast cycle, which commenced in 2016/17, As the league heads into a period of lower 2,062 with wage costs increasing by 15% to almost growth through the middle years of the four- 2,000 2,033 1,643 1,692 £2.9 billion (€3.2 billion). year broadcast rights cycle, it is likely that the 1,674 1,691 1,478 1,401 1,472 wages to revenue ratio of the Bundesliga will 1,262 1,000 1,078 This increase pushed Europe’s biggest spending increase to a higher level than has been seen league to a wages to revenue ratio of 59%, in Germany over the past decade, but remain and with lower growth projections for future comparatively low amongst the ‘big five’ aided 0 16/17 17/18 16/17 17/18 16/17 17/18 16/17 17/18 16/17 17/18 RevenueWage costs England Germany Spain Italy France revenue this is likely to return above 60% in by the requirements of the DFL’s licensing Wages/revenue ratioAverage club wages 2018/19 and remain there for the foreseeable standards. 55% 59% 53% 53% 59% 66% 68% 66% 66% 75% future.

Italy 145 161 82 93 85 102 70 74 54 63 Spain Serie A wages spending increased at the slowest La Liga clubs increased wages spending at rate of the ‘big five’ leagues in 2017/18, as the double-digit pace (c.20%) for the third consecutive league’s wages to revenue ratio dropped to Revenue Wages/revenue ratio Source: Leagues; Deloitte analysis. year, far outstripping the growth of the Premier 66%, its lowest level since 2005/06. Wage costs Average club wages League, as wage costs growth caught up with revenues, following increases in broadcast Seven clubs reported a reduction in wages distributions in both 2015/16 and 2016/17. spending in 2017/18 as total spending increased France growth, due to the high-profile acquisitions of by just 5%. Lazio’s wage costs growth of 40% 2017/18 saw Ligue 1 clubs’ wage costs increase Neymar Jr. and Kylian Mbappé. Monaco also Aggregate La Liga wage costs rose above was by far the most significant among Serie A rapidly, up 17% on 2016/17, as a high-level of increased their spend by over 30% as these €2 billion for the first time. Of the €340m clubs as they chased, and narrowly missed out receipts from transfers, the impact of recent three clubs together accounted for over 70% of increase, 44% related to FC Barcelona’s wages on, securing Italy’s additional UEFA Champions investment at several clubs and the security of the leagues’ additional cost. spending, which rose 40%, to in excess of League qualifying berth for the 2018/19 season. agreed broadcast revenue uplifts from 2018/19, €500m, due to major contract renewals and and more significantly, from 2020/21, gave clubs Worryingly, this saw the average wages to transfer activity following the sale of Neymar Jr. Juventus’ acquisition of Ronaldo, and other the opportunity to boost wages spending on revenue ratio increase by nine percentage transfer activity in the 2018 Summer window, new talent. points to 75%; significantly in excess of the 70% Having dropped below a 60% wages to revenue is likely to see an increase in Serie A wages ratio often considered to be a benchmark for ratio in the last edition of this report, 2017/18 spending in the next edition of this report. Marseille’s wages bill increased by 43% to over sustainability. saw this ratio increase by seven percentage €125m, whilst PSG’s wage costs increase of points, to 66%, its highest level in over a decade. c.€60m contributed around a third of overall

11 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Europe’s premier leagues

Aggregate operating profits of Europe’s ‘big Chart 5: ‘Big five’ European league clubs’ profitability – 2008/09 to 2017/18 (€m) five’ leagues fell in 2017/18 as wage spending 1,208 The future of football Start of FFP Start of break-even Enhanced caught up on the significant revenue uplifts 1,250 UEFA FFP regulations first break-even compliance version of FFP generated by new English and Spanish approved requirement monitoring regulations 979 UEFA’s Financial Fair Play Regulations have domestic broadcast deals in 2016/17. 1,000 England contributed towards European clubs’ much improved financial results and reduced 739 681 721 debt situation since 2012. Enhanced 750 England requirements for clubs effective from the Despite reducing, Premier League clubs 455 Germany 2018/19 season have been somewhat 500 397 recorded their second-best ever aggregate 347 373 overshadowed by media reports about 316 264 284 operating profit of almost €1 billion. 250 343 Spain historic cases and recent appeals. UEFA’s 171 190 250 172 138 260 226 new strategy points towards further future 81 104 96 Three clubs announced record operating profits 30 54 changes to UEFA’s regulations as times 93 103 (3) Italy in excess of €100m, despite the Premier League (35) (40) change and new challenges emerge. 0 (64) (102) (97) (67) failing to repeat last year’s feat of all clubs (140) (53) (98) (43) (116) (110) (133) recording a profit, with 19 of the 20 recording a (149) (160) (143) France Responding to polarisation trends, UEFA’s positive operating result. -250 new strategy also identifies competitive (298) balance as a key priority, while preserving

Spain -500 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 financial sustainability, incentivising La Liga clubs recorded their lowest aggregate investment and promoting the growth of operating profit (€226m) since 2014/15 as wage Italy Note: The operating result is the net of revenues less European football. In addition to potential cost growth outpaced that of revenue in 2017/18. 2017/18 saw Italian clubs record a combined wage costs and other operating costs. The operating regulatory measures, the policies include result excludes player trading and certain exceptional operating profit of over €50m, their best result exploring the potential of new UEFA club items. Aggregate operating results for Spanish clubs With Spain’s next broadcast cycle not in the history of this publication. More than were not available prior to 2013/14. competitions to provide more commencing until 2019/20 the next edition of half of all Serie A clubs reported an operating opportunities for more teams to play more this report may see these profits further reduce. profit, a significant improvement on last year, Source: Leagues; Deloitte analysis. meaningful matches from 2024. as the aggregate achievement of profitability Germany demonstrated that Italian club football is France Ideas aired as part of the stakeholder Bundesliga clubs continued to deliver on their capable of achieving combined sustainability, Not only were Ligue 1 clubs the only of the ‘big consultation process include the top 24 reputation for balanced economic performance following a long period of financial challenges. five’ leagues to record an aggregate operating clubs in a 32-club Champions League and behaviour, with additional revenues loss, they recorded their worst aggregate qualifying automatically for the following providing an opportunity to increase spending Changes to UEFA competition regulations operating result to date, as increased wages season’s competition, rather than through and yet still deliver its best operating result to making increased distributions to Italian spending and other costs saw the deficit performance in their domestic league. Any date; a profit of €373m. clubs likely, coupled with an international increase to €298m for 2017/18. change in the relationship between broadcast rights uplift from 2018/19 and the domestic and international club regulatory environment in which European club Ligue 1’s high wages to revenue ratio, coupled competitions and the pursuit of an optimal competition participants now operate, may with limited opportunities for major revenue calendar to facilitate club and national result in this positive operating result being growth in the short-term, indicates that team competitions will generate some repeated, or bettered, in coming seasons. operating losses look set to continue, at least challenging discussions amongst the key until the commencement of a new domestic stakeholders over the next few years. broadcast rights cycle in 2020/21. 12 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Europe’s premier leagues

1,000 The announcement of the introduction the UEFA rankings, unlocking additional club Chart 6: Selected other European league clubs’ revenue – 2017/18 (€m) of a third UEFA club competition, under competition access, through improved revenue 813 the working name of ‘Europa League 2’, distribution, youth development, competition 800 152 731 Matchday Sponsorship/Commercial 39 commencing in 2021/22, will be seen as format, match conditions and commercial growth. 242 Broadcasting Other commercial 497 an opportunity for more widespread, and 600 495 less volatile, growth of revenue for clubs in The next edition of this report should see 98 431 Europe’s non ‘big five’ leagues. aggregate revenues boosted by increased UEFA 376 53 400 188 distributions as a result of Ajax’s progress to the 95 233 Champions League semi-finals. 225 185 177 64 39 151 141 Russia 200 89 59 53 124 112 64 19 45 120 62 74 22 55 65 The surged ahead of 52 105 14 28 22 42 35 20 74 58 50 35 39 the Turkish Süper Lig to take its place as the Driven by increased distributions and matchday 0 Russia Turkey Netherlands Portugal Scotland Denmark sixth-highest revenue generating top-tier league revenues, as a result of the UEFA Champions in Europe, driven by a new broadcast rights deal League group stage participation of its top Average revenue per club (€m) which delivered an increase of c.33%. three clubs (S.L. Benfica, FC and Sporting 51 41 27 24 19 13 18 9 9 8 CP) the Portuguese saw overall Wages/revenue ratio In anticipation of the 2018 FIFA World Cup, revenue growth of 18%, as further polarisation 72% 76% 58% 68% 61% 64% 68% 54% 69% 74% matchday revenues increased by almost 50% as in revenues increased competitive imbalance. clubs benefited from stadia and infrastructure Notes: This chart includes a sample of countries developments and increased popularity, which Scotland Austria ranking below fifth in terms of average top division it will be hoped can deliver sustained revenue (‘SPFL’) revenues increased Red Bull Salzburg’s progress to the Europa club revenues for the most recent available financial growth in future seasons. to £206m (€233m) in 2017/18, driven by League semi-final failed to inspire significant results. Figures in respect of Turkey, Portugal, Russia and Norway are in respect of FY2017. Figures in respect matchday revenue growth of 19%, as highest growth in the Austrian Bundesliga, as matchday of clubs in Denmark, Poland and Sweden related to the Turkey average attendances since 2006/07 aided by the revenue increases were almost entirely offset year to December 2018. The 2017/18 season also saw the start of a new return of Hibernian to the top flight. by decreases in broadcast and commercial domestic broadcast rights deal for the Turkish revenues. Source: Leagues; Club accounts; UEFA; Deloitte analysis. Süper Lig, providing an uplift reportedly worth Following the termination of the SPFL’s previous c.€250m per season over the next five years. international media rights agreement with MP The Austrian Bundesliga looks set to deliver The , having adopted a 14 team The full impact of this increase will be seen & Silva, replacement deals, making the league an improved revenue performance in the split-season format in 2016/17, agreed further for the first time in next year’s edition of this available to view in 119 territories for two next edition of this report as a number of new reforms in 2018 which will see a return to a report, and we expect this to result in the league seasons from 2018/19, were agreed with beIN commercial deals, including Austria Wien’s with 12 team top flight from 2020/21 in an attempt reclaiming its position as the sixth-highest Sports and other broadcasters. , commenced in the 2018/19 season. to drive the value of its broadcast and newly revenue generating league in Europe. aggregated commercial rights. An exclusive five-year domestic broadcast rights Denmark, Poland, Norway and Sweden Netherlands deal with will deliver a 20% increase As no representative of Denmark, Poland, New broadcast deals, each set to deliver Despite 10% revenue growth in the Eredivise, on the existing deal from 2020/21 and despite Norway or Sweden qualified for the Champions significant growth, are due to commence on-field disappointment for Dutch clubs and Celtic winning an 8th successive league title League group stage, these leagues must look in Poland and Sweden in 2021 and 2019 national sides led to professional football in the in May 2019, signs of increasing competitive to other sources of revenue growth to prevent respectively, but organic commercial growth Netherlands unveiling a change agenda, with balance, thanks to the improved challenge of them falling further behind other non ‘big-five’ appears more challenging without major the objective of introducing reforms which can Rangers, should help future revenue growth. leagues. on-field success. ultimately establish the nation in 8th place of 13 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Can they deliver the high-quality, un- Live sport and the FAANGs: buffered broadcast that sports fans have come to expect? Are they worth Still courting the potential negative PR from fans? Premium sports rights owners

How can they ensure that With the increasing shift towards digital, more and more Yet these rights owners recognise the shift our IP is protected? people are choosing to reduce, or even cease, watching towards digital and the need to maintain engagement beyond the match itself. Streaming content via traditional means (the so-called cord cutters, platforms enable delivery of content to a truly Is the rights fee worth destabilising global, younger audience in a way that better shavers and cord nevers). the long-term relationships, trust and suits their preferences; all the while learning know-how built up with traditional far more about who these fans are and what broadcasters? The thrill of the chase Sport also provides a rich ecosystem of they like; insight that heretofore has been very In this context, attracting and retaining complementary programming for major limited through traditional broadcast media. audiences has become the priority for media technology companies, spanning multiple and entertainment companies. The value of strands that can be used to increase time Do these platforms, as rights compelling content, and exclusive content in spent on their platforms. Beyond traditional Uncertainty is natural acquirers, offer the opportunity particular, has never been higher. non-live rights, behind-the-scenes footage, Given these factors, premium sports rights for casual sports fans to discover and/or passively engage in data visualisation, fantasy sports, esports, owners and the FAANGs seem like natural content? The importance of this is not lost on the major e-commerce, gamification and betting data bedfellows. However, the approach from both is global technology companies, with each of the all offer alternative means of extending in its early stages and to date has been largely FAANGs (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix engagement beyond the match itself. experimental. Despite much speculation and How integrated into the come and Google (Alphabet)) having launched, or anticipation, we are yet to see a major package home, turn on, lean back experience announced, some form of content delivery A combination of expenditure rationalisation, of premium sports rights acquired by one of the are these platforms? platform, seen as one of the best means of market consolidations, constrained budgets and West Coast giants. increasing time spent on their respective content-sharing agreements has led to a threat platforms. of reduced competition for sports rights among It is wrong to assume that, despite their deep Does the lack of dependency on traditional broadcasters, with a consequent pockets, the FAANGs will simply acquire sports rights mean that other Live sport remains one of the few remaining impact on values. Set against recent periods premium sports rights without an underlying distractions may supersede delivering and developing sports forms of ‘appointment to view’ content, of significant rights fees growth, and the more business rationale, and the substantial growth content successfully? unrivalled in its ability to draw a passionate, embryonic state of emerging platforms in of these companies in recent years has been loyal and engaged fanbase, one that also has this market, this pause for breath is perhaps achieved without any material expenditure on a greater propensity to spend both on content understandable. premium sports rights. Similarly, there are also Do business objectives and ancillary items. a number of key issues for rights owners that align – is global reach more require further consideration (see conversation). important than growing revenues to satisfy clubs?

14 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Are the risks associated with a failure in streaming premium sports rights worth the potential negative PR and financial ramifications?

Major global technology platforms

What additional technical requirements will we need to develop specifically to It takes two to tango The challenge for rights owners is to find deliver live sport successfully? It is therefore understandable that both parties the right balance between the use of these have to date adopted a test/refine approach, platforms to broaden exposure to the sport, with sports rights owners tailoring their tender without endangering relationships with processes to suit. The FAANGs meanwhile have traditional partners; all the while knowing In addition to the rights fee, how do we manage typically focused on territories that are of wider that market competition is required to the (not-insignificant) operational requirements to produce, distribute, promote and market content strategic importance and less risky for rights continue the escalation in premium to the standard expected by sports fans? owners, with content shared on an exclusive sports rights fees seen over the and non-exclusive basis. last decade.

Is it a challenge that, more so than To complicate the scene a little more, a number In the short-term other forms of entertainment of rights owners have opted to launch their own, we expect this (with the exception of news), there separate, direct-to-consumer platforms, with La experimental is a finite limit to the amount of Liga, Serie A and Ligue 1 all having announced process to compelling live sports content? or launched platforms to distribute content. continue, with both rights owners and the Does the limited shelf life of live sport, and FAANGs continuing to learn inflexibility in viewing time, make it less Let’s take things slowly how sport, and broadcasting suited to core platforms built on snackable, For now it would appear that the most suitable of live sport in particular, aligns shareable content? relationship for both premium sport rights with their business models and owners and the major technology companies is strategic desires. Is live sport best suited to our existing platforms to agree non-exclusive deals for rights, with the and means of interaction with consumers? Do goal of this ‘freemium model’ being the use of these rights align with our business models in freely available content to increase exposure to The Sports Business Group at Deloitte particular markets? Through what other means the sport, engage users through short-form and regularly advises sports rights owners can the costs be refinanced? behind-the-scenes footage, and in due course and broadcasters on their media and encourage conversion to subscription services commercial strategies, and provides Does the short-term rights cycles and on other platforms. assistance to investors in sports media territorial specificity of premium sports rights businesses. make them less attractive than other forms of content, which can be ‘owned’ for a far greater period of time (including in perpetuity) and across a far greater number of territories?

15 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Premier League clubs

Premier League clubs

As predicted in last year’s edition, Premier Chart 7: Premier League clubs’ revenues Broadcast revenue increased by £76m (3%) League clubs’ revenue grew by 6% to a Impact of individual clubs 2015/16-2019/20 (£m) to £2.8 billion, with distributions from UEFA record £4.8 billion in 2017/18, driven by increasing by 25% due to a record number of increased UEFA distributions to English Of the 17 consistent clubs in both 2016/17 6,000 Projected English clubs in the UEFA Champions League, 5,240 clubs as five teams participated in the and 2017/18, Manchester United 5,050 along with improved performances in the 4,819 1,490 Champions League for the first time and generated the most revenue (£590m), the 5,000 4,556 1,390 28% competition compared to the previous season. 1,305 28% the impact of significant new commercial third highest in world football. , 1,168 27% deals for a number of clubs. Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur 26% Matchday revenue increased 8% (£50m) to 4,000 3,639 accounted for almost £241m of collective 3,030 £670m, and represents a marginally improved 1,090 3,000 58% 30% 2,844 59% revenue growth in 2017/18. Liverpool’s 2,768 59% share of total revenue (14%) having represented a 61% Premier League clubs’ revenue lucrative run to the Champions League 3,000 record low of 13% in 2016/17. Tottenham Hotspur The average revenue of a Premier Final allowed the club to achieve the 1,927 were responsible for more than half (£26m) of 53% increased to £241m in 2017/18, an increase of highest year-on-year revenue increase 2,000 the increase. £13m. Average revenue has increased every (£91m) of any of the top 10 highest season since the competition began in 1992/93, revenue generating clubs in the world. 1,000 highlighting the lasting and continued appeal of 622 620 670 660 720 14% Premier League football for fans, broadcasters For Chelsea, a return to Champions 17% 13% 14% 13% Future revenue growth and sponsors across the world. League football and the start of a new kit 0 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 deal enabled revenue growth of £80m Average revenue per club Revenue increases in the 2018/19 season The majority (£137m) of the £263m increase in (22%), whilst Tottenham Hotspur 182 228 241 252 261 are expected to be driven by those clubs Premier League clubs’ revenue in 2017/18 was capitalised on its temporary relocation to competing in UEFA competitions, with this due to commercial revenue growth, with Chelsea, and improved on-pitch Matchday Broadcasting Commercial being the first season of their new Liverpool, Manchester City and Tottenham performances to secure enhanced broadcasting deals. An all-English final Hotspur together responsible for most of the commercial deals. Source: Deloitte analysis. between Liverpool and Tottenham improvement. Record commercial revenue Hotspur coupled with a derby in (£1.3 billion) was generated in 2017/18 and Overall, ten of the 17 consistent Premier The 2017/18 season was also the first that Baku for the UEFA Europa League title will continues to comprise just over a quarter of League clubs achieved personal record allowed shirt sleeve sponsorship and the drive revenue upwards. This coupled with total revenue. For Chelsea and Spurs, the start revenue in 2017/18, with City additional commercial inventory appears to increases in matchday and commercial of a lucrative new kit deals with Nike enabled suffering a 32% (£74m) revenue reduction have had a positive effect for most clubs, with leads us to estimate that Premier League commercial growth and demonstrates the from their 2016/17 Champions League 12 of the 17 who participated in the previous revenue will rise to over £5 billion for the continued appeal of the Premier League to season. Premier League season generating an increase first time when the results of the 2018/19 partners. in commercial revenue. season are known.

16 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Premier League clubs

Whilst the relatively equal distribution Chart 8: Premier League and Championship clubs’ average revenues – 2017/18 (£m) mechanism for central Premier League After the watershed 475 revenues, relative to other ‘big five’ 500 188 leagues, has been a persistent strength The 2018/19 season was the last season of Commercial of the competition, there has been a the current broadcast rights arrangements. 400 noticeable widening of average revenue The new deals will deliver an increase Broadcasting other generated by the largest clubs compared overall in media revenues, but at a lower 289 300 11 to the rest. The ‘big six’ clubs earned an scale compared to the substantial growth 56 69 Broadcasting UEFA average of £461m each in 2017/18, an achieved in the two previous cycles 9 141 23 increase of 11%, compared to an unchanged 200 130 149 Broadcasting PL central 127 average of £147m for other clubs. The Premier League has recognised the 18 9 16 10 need to continue to embrace innovation, as 108 93 Matchday 100 51 8 21 shown by Amazon obtaining a package of 79 58 5 7 3 8 30 8 5 6 Premier League clubs’ revenue levels two rounds of games for the 2019/20 14 All Premier League clubs ranked in the top season onwards, as well as to continue to 0 UCL clubs UEL clubs Premier League Premier League Championship Championship (other) (relegated) with parachute without parachute 40 revenue generating clubs in the world in expand its international appeal, with the 2017/18, with all of the Premier League’s ‘big six’ international broadcast rights offering a Commercial Broadcasting PL central Note: UCL clubs comprised Chelsea, featuring in the top ten for the first time. Spain greater growth opportunity than the Broadcasting other Matchday Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur. UEL clubs remains the only other country with more than domestic market. The Premier League Broadcasting UEFA comprised Arsenal and Everton. one club in the top ten, with Real Madrid and faces strong competition from other ‘big FC Barcelona the two highest revenue five’ leagues, who are also looking to Source: Premier League; UEFA; generating clubs in the world. appeal to, and monetise, a global audience. Deloitte analysis.

The average revenue of Premier League UEFA’s new broadcasting contracts from clubs participating in the Champions League 2018/19 will provide revenue increases for Transfer fee slowdown transfer market and improved financial increased by 35% to £475m in 2017/18. This those clubs who are able to obtain a place stability for Premier League clubs reducing was due to an increase in the number of ‘big in its competitions, however, for those In last year’s report it was noted how 2017/18 the need to sell their best talent. The six’ clubs participating in the competition (from clubs who cannot consistently compete at was a record year for transfers, with relatively limited increase in the global value three to five), as Manchester United, Chelsea this level, the focus for revenue growth £1.9 billion spent by Premier League clubs of the Premier Leagues broadcast rights and Liverpool all returned to the competition, must now turn closer to home to who utilised their additional broadcast from 2019-2022, compared to the two replacing Leicester City and Arsenal. This had commercial revenues. revenue. However, gross transfer spend of previous cycles, also appears to have a knock-on effect on average revenue for UEFA Premier League clubs fell to £1.4 billion in moderated clubs’ desire to spend as Europa League clubs (Arsenal and Everton), 2018/19, making the most recent season the significantly in the transfer market. which fell 9% (£27m) to £289m. first since 2011/12 in which there has been competitions, average revenue was £149m. such a year-on-year reduction. With no imminent collective revenue The three relegated clubs in 2017/18 had Across this population of clubs the ratio between increases on the horizon, the transfer average revenue of £127m, with all three clubs highest and lowest revenue was 1.4, highlighting The decrease is attributable to a combination spending record of £1.9 billion may remain receiving a parachute payment of over £40m the relatively balanced nature of the Premier of factors including reduced activity by the intact in the short term. in 2018/19. For the ten clubs who avoided League club finances beyond the ‘big six’. ‘big six’ clubs, a perceived lack of value in the relegation and did not participate in UEFA

17 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Premier League clubs

Premier League clubs’ wage costs grew Chart 9: Premier League clubs’ revenues Manchester United by 15% in 2017/18, reaching a record Impact of individual clubs and wage costs – 2016/17 and 2017/18 (£m) level of almost £2.9 billion. This marks a (£296m) continued return to trend for Premier League clubs The number of clubs paying more than 6,000 whose revenue growth had outstripped the league’s average wage costs (£142m) 4,819 to be the division’s wage increases in 2016/17. As a result, the increased to seven in 2017/18, as Everton 5,000 4,556 wages/revenue ratio has increased, but reported a 53% (£55m) increase in wage highest wage payers,Revenue remains below 60% for only the fifth time costs to £160m to join the ‘big six’ at the 4,000 in the last 20 years. top of the wages table. This population of but whilst wagesWage co sts seven clubs were responsible for 57% of 3,000 Wages/revenue ratio total wage costs. 2,850 increased by more Premier League clubs’ wage costs 2,487 Average wage costs In 2017/18, increased spending by Premier Manchester United (£296m) continued to 2,000 than £30m the club League clubs resulted in the wages/revenue be the division’s highest wage payers, but per club ratio rising to 59% as the financial consequences whilst wages increased by more than 1,000 continues to have of record breaking transfer activity in 2016/17 £30m the club continues to have a Source: Deloitte analysis. filtered through. However, this ratio is the fourth relatively favourable wages/revenue ratio a relatively favourable lowest since 1998/99 such has been the positive (50%). Only two clubs recorded a wages/ 0 2016/17 2017/18 impact on clubs’ revenue from the start of revenue ratio of less than 50% in 2017/18. 55% 59% wages/revenue the broadcast rights cycle that commenced in Promoted club Town spent 2016/17. the least (£63m) and were rewarded for ratio (50%). showing relative restraint as they 124 142 Only two clubs saw a year-on-year reduction narrowly avoided relegation to the in wage costs, Swansea City and promoted Championship. Revenue Wages/revenue ratio club Newcastle United. The increase in the Wage costs Average club wages wages/revenue ratio is an indication of the Tottenham Hotspur (39%) became only competitive nature of the division, with the top the third club to spend less than 40% of clubs competing for financially lucrative places its revenue on wages since 1998/99, but Source: Deloitte analysis. in UEFA competitions, and clubs lower down this was not detrimental to on-pitch the division competing to remain in the Premier performance as the club qualified for the League itself. Champions League once again, and subsequently reached the final in Madrid. £2.1 billion Contributed by English professional football to Government in taxes in 2017/18

18 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Premier League clubs

Eight Premier League clubs reported a Chart 10: Premier League clubs’ revenues and wage costs – 2017/18 (£m) wages/revenue ratio in excess of the 70%, the indicative warning level used by 700 UEFA as part of their Financial Fair Play 590

Regulations. This represents a considerable 600 Averag e increase on the previous season in which 503 only two clubs reported a ratio above this 500 455 448 threshold. Tottenham Hotspu r

389 379 400 Correlation between wage costs and league position 300 296

241 Everto n

The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, 264 Newcastle United 260 West Ham United Southampto n Burnle y Leicester Cit y Crystal Palace Brighton & Hove Albion Watfor d Stoke Cit y Huddersfield Town 246 AFC Bournemout h Swansea Cit y West Bromwich Albion 240 189 which measures the relationship between y 178 177 200 160 152 150 league position and wage costs rank, reduced 140 139 135 160 128 127 127 127 125 marginally to 0.75 in 2017/18 (0.81 in 2016/17). 148 142 107 119 113 117 11 clubs finished within two places either side 100 94 102 94 92 82 78 91 86 63

of the ranking of their wage costs, once again Manchester United Manchester Cit Liverpool Chelse a Arsenal highlighting that the greater relative wages 0 spend is likely to result in a higher finishing 50% 52% 58% 55% 62% 39% 59% 85% 52% 60% 75% 74% 78% 58% 56% 76% 71% 67% 74% 49% 74% position in the league. At the top of the table, the alignment between finishing position and Revenue Wage costs Wages/revenue ratio Source: Deloitte analysis. wage spend is particularly noticeable. Six of the seven highest wage spenders finished in the top seven places. Six of the seven Future wages trends a more rapid rate than revenue, or even by a However, all three of the lowest wage spending greater absolute amount. This reflects the highest wage clubs out-performed their relative wage Whilst the ratio has worsened slightly in ferocity of competition to stay up and the rankings to avoid relegation. Two of the three 2017/18 there is still a noticeable fear of relegation. spenders finished promoted clubs (Brighton and Huddersfield improvement since 2012/13 when the Town) had the lowest wage costs yet both average ratio climbed as high as 71%. Nonetheless, whilst wage costs have in the top seven avoided relegation, whilst Burnley were the increased every year since 2004/05, and we most notable over-achievers, outperforming With the six highest wage spenders in expect a continued trend of greater places. their wages rank by 11 places to finish seventh 2017/18 finishing in the top six places in the year-on-year spending, general uncertainty as the Premier League continued to prove itself 2018/19 season and Huddersfield Town amongst clubs regarding the timing and to be a fiercely competitive league capable of relegated, a strong correlation between scale of the next big increase in central surprise. wage costs and league position seems to be shared revenue should mean that these being maintained. A notable emerging trend increases are not at a level that would is that it is the 11 non promoted, non ‘big six’ threaten the collective profitability of clubs who have tended to increase wages at Premier League clubs.

19 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Premier League clubs

Whilst Premier League clubs recorded Three clubs, Manchester United (£166m), Chart 11: Premier League clubs’ profitability – 2013/14-2017/18 (£m) lower levels of profitability in 2017/18, Tottenham Hotspur (£144m) and Manchester collective operating and pre-tax profits City (£113m), together generated almost 1,250 were the second highest in the history of half (49%) of total operating profits. It was 1,038 the league, and only one club reported an the first time in the history that three clubs 1,000 19 20 867 Operating profit/(loss) operating loss. The recent trend towards have achieved profitability of over £100m in 17 17 31 52 a single season. The three promoted clubs 19 profitability at the highest level of football 27 25 750 618 in England appears set to continue for the generated combined operating profits of 43 549 509 528 near future, at an operating level at least, £130m, which represents a £237m turnaround 426 as owners and investors are reaping the on their collective operating loss of £107m in 500 Profit/(loss) before tax 18 financial rewards of running a top-flight the 2016/17 Championship and underlines 13 187 26 football club in the world’s most lucrative the transformative impact of the aggregate 250 112 12 21 league within an environment of enhanced £433m they received in central Premier 14 cost control regulations. League distributions in their first season after 14 (6) 0 9 promotion. 6 (115) Premier League clubs’ operating profits Pre-tax-profits...and losses -250 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 Having broken the £1 billion barrier for the Premier League clubs generated a collective first time in 2016/17, Premier League clubs’ total of £426m in pre-tax profits in the 2017/18 Number of clubs operating profits (which excludes player trading, season. This was a reduction of 19% on the Premier League clubs’ reporting operating amortisation of player transfer fees and finance previous record of the 2016/17 season of profit/pre-tax profit costs) fell 16% (£171m) to £867m in 2017/18. £528m. The previous pre-tax profit club record economic impact This remains more than 70% greater than the of £92m set by Leicester City in the 2016/17 Whilst our Annual Review of Football Finance Average club operating operating profitability reported in the 2015/16 season was beaten twice, with £139m pre-tax focuses on the financial results and position result/pre-tax result season (£509m) such has been the impact of profit generated by Tottenham Hotspur and recorded in clubs’ own accounts, what may greatly increased broadcasting revenue and the £120m by Liverpool. often be overlooked is the wider economic and Note: The operating result is the cost control measures. social impact generated by Premier League net of revenue less wage costs Although the average pre-tax profit for the clubs’ community activities and sporting events. and other operating costs. The Of the 17 clubs that also participated in the 2017/18 season was £21m, the number of operating result excludes player trading and certain exceptional Premier League in 2016/17, 16 reported an clubs making a pre-tax profit reduced by The Deloitte Sports Business Group recently items, which are included in the operating profit but only six (including four five to 13 from 18 in the 2016/17 season. reported how the activities of Liverpool FC pre-tax result, along with other of the ‘big six’ clubs) recorded a year-on-year Worryingly, of the seven clubs who returned during the 2017/18 season boosted the costs such as financing costs. increase, such was the level of increased a pre-tax loss, three (Stoke City, Swansea City Liverpool City Region economy by almost The 2015/16 pre-tax result includes wage expenditure in the 2017/18 season. Only and West Bromwich Albion) were relegated, £500m through its range of commercial one-off costs of £67m at Chelsea Everton recorded an operating loss, with a and therefore will need to manage their costs relationships and supply chains, the visitor (in respect of termination of £37m (149%) drop in profitability highlighting effectively to ensure their financial positions do economy and fiscal contributions. We also sponsorship deal) and £45m at the financial risks of attempting to break into not significantly worsen in the Championship reported that events at Wembley Stadium, in Aston Villa (impairment of tangible fixed assets). the ‘big six’. (despite the receipt of parachute payments). the tenth anniversary of its opening, contributed £150m to the local economy of Source: Deloitte analysis. Brent, £424m to London and £615m to England.

20 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Premier League clubs

600 Premier League clubs’ net debt increased Chart 12: Premier League clubs’ net debt – 2018 (£m) 416 by almost £1 billion on the summer 2017 Individual club analysis position to stand at almost £3 billion at the 400 end of the 2017/18 season, its highest level Six of the 17 consistent Premier League 238 since the summer of 2009. At that time, clubs in the Premier League reported an 200 net debt represented 167% of Premier improved net debt /funds position in 32 34 9 (45) 22 4 9 8 League revenues, now in 2017/18 it is 61%. 2017/18. The largest improvement was at 0 (1) (91) (75) Over two-thirds of the increase in 2017/18 Arsenal, by £59m to a net funds position of (100) (69) was within soft loans from club owners £38m, following an increase in cash (123) -200 and heavily driven by the three promoted balances of £51m. (223) (66) (360) clubs. (400) Everto n Watfor d The top ten most indebted clubs accounted -400 (492) (430) Stoke Cit y

for 97% of Premier League clubs’ total net Liverpool (91)

Premier League clubs’ net debt debt. The largest increase in net debt was AFC Bournemout h -600 Soft loans – clubs’ borrowings on interest-free at Tottenham Hotspur, contributing over Total Total 2018 2017 terms typically from their owners – increased 60% of the consistent Premier League -800 in 2017/18 by £679m (46%). The majority of this clubs’ increase in net debt, as a result of Tottenham Hotspu r 367 625 Brighton & Hove Albion Other clubs movement was driven by club mix, as the clubs financing the new Tottenham Hotspur Newcastle United Manchester United promoted to the Premier League for 2017/18 Stadium. -1,000 (1,159) (1,101) contributed a combined soft loans balance Chelse a of over £700m as at summer 2018. Soft loans Five clubs ended 2017/18 in a net funds (1,155) -1,200 (2,157) (1,478) remain the largest component of clubs’ net position, these being Arsenal, Burnley, debt, accounting for 73% of the total, a marginal Leicester City, and West (1,123) (397) (360) (254) (214) (211) (101) (87) (66) (61) (75) (2,949) (1,954) decrease on the summer 2017 position (76%). Bromwich Albion. Only Burnley and Southampton improved on net funds 1 2 (18) (18) (1)(6) 0(5) (3)(2) (23) (73) (103) Net debt, excluding soft loans, stood at £792m positions from the prior year, with only in 2017/18, an increase of £316m (66%) on Arsenal (aforementioned) crossing into a 2016/17 levels. This was heavily influenced by a net funds position from a net debt position Net cash/bank borrowings reduction in clubs’ net cash/bank borrowings year-on-year. Both Leicester City and West Premier (243)League(213) (126) clubs’(64) (51) (47) (46) (40) (21) Other loans position of £258m (41%), with a £280m increase Bromwich Albion remained in net funds Soft loans in bank loans and £99m reduction in cash positions despite large falls in cash net debt increased Net debt balances at Tottenham Hotspur being partially balances of £25m and £30m respectively. Net cash/bank Net debtNet finance costs offset by other clubs. by almost £1 billionborr owings Note: Net debt for Newcastle Other loans – being borrowings from financial The net finance costs for Premier League clubs Other loans United is based on figures to stand at almost disclosed in financial statements of institutions, other parties and interest-bearing have decreased £30m year-on-year, from Soft loans Newcastle United Ltd and St. James owner loans – marginally increased by £58m £103m to £73m. Despite the slight fall in clubs’ £3 billion at the end of Holdings Ltd. (5%) in 2017/18. profitability levels, net finance costs continued to be covered almost twelve times by aggregate the 2017/18 season. Source: Deloitte analysis. operating profits in 2017/18.

21 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Shaping the future of women’s football

The last few years have seen the popularity of women’s June/July 2015 July 2015 2017 May 2018 1.35m attendance v USA final 3,572 professional/ 45,000+ fans football build momentum, and in recent months the business at the Women’s was the most semi-professional attend the side of the game has accelerated, with several landmark World Cup, watched soccer players in Europe Women’s FA Canada game in US history Cup Final commercial deals. (23m viewers)

2015 2017 2018 Introduction Competition structure This summer, the expanded FIFA Women’s Competition structure can have a crucial effect Recent developments in women’s football World Cup (increased to 24 teams from 16) is on the overall popularity and success of a expected to smash attendance and viewership competition. It needs to deliver meaningful records and propel women’s football into the matches and a compelling narrative that draws • International Table Tennis Federation’s (ITTF) development and has a great opportunity to limelight. With most women’s professional in both fans and commercial partners. Achieving reform of their World Championships to adapt its competition structure, and to create football leagues and clubs in their early stages the optimal competition structure requires expand the event to include regional and an exciting product that will increase the of development, the profile from the 2019 World careful balancing of many factors such as continental qualifiers from 2021; attractiveness of the game. Cup provides a significant opportunity for rights duration, calendar, competitors, events, venues holders and brands to shape the future of the and format. • Netball Australia and TV network Channel Regulations and governance sport. Now is the moment to take stock, assess Nine entered a revenue-sharing partnership To be financially sustainable and encourage the landscape and consider and act upon the Recent examples of competition reform or the creating the Suncorp Super Netball League competitive balance, competitions need to have opportunities the women’s game presents. creation of a new competition include: in 2017; and appropriate governance and regulations in place. • Fédération internationale de basket-ball’s The most successful club competitions have clear These opportunities will only be fully realised (FIBA) expansion of the World Cup from 24 • The Indian Premier League (IPL) was rules on cost control (often including a salary if appropriate infrastructure is built now. to 32 teams and an introduction of a new established in 2008 and is now one of the cap), but also on division of commercial rights Successful sports competitions need solid hosting year for the tournament to prevent highest revenue generating leagues globally. between teams and leagues, and generation foundations, and four of these (competition it overlapping with the FIFA World Cup (the and distribution of revenues from any collective structure, governance and regulations, media 2014 FIBA World Cup will be followed by the All of these examples have one common theme rights. Establishing appropriate regulations rights and sponsorship strategy) are considered 2019 FIBA World Cup); – to increase the appeal of their events to fans, in the women’s game now will help to ensure below. media and sponsors. Whilst some competitions financial sustainability, reduce the likelihood • Fédération Internationale de Hockey’s (FIH) are well established, making it harder to of club insolvencies and optimise competitive introduction of a new Home and Away reform or create new competitions, women’s balance. Good governance and financial security league (FIH Pro League) in 2019 for both professional football is in its early stages of will also assist in attracting investors and men’s and women’s teams; sponsors to the game further emphasising the importance of good governance. 22 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Sept 2018 October 2018 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 April 2019 FA Women’s Super FIFA publish first Mediapro/Primera Nike sign as a main Women’s club match Barclays sign a multi- 39,000 sell-out Boots sign as a League (WSL) ever strategy for División TV rights sponsor of UEFA World Record attendance million pound deal to crowd at Juventus main sponsor of all becomes fully women’s football deal (€3m per season, women’s football – 60,739 attended become title sponsor v Fiorentina four home nations professional 2019/20 to 2021/22) in a seven year Atlético Madrid Femenino of the FA WSL and the Republic deal vs FC Barcelona Femení of

2019

Media rights Sponsorship strategy The future Media exposure and revenue is an essential Clubs are in fierce competition when it comes As women’s football continues element of any successful sports league or to commercial deals, as they tend to be sold to receive greater interest from competition. To attract, retain and grow the on a club-by-club basis. This model may seem fans, media and sponsors, rights fanbase, the competition needs to be visible advantageous for certain clubs as it provides holders have an opportunity to and easily available for people to consume. As an opportunity to obtain a competitive seize this moment and use it as a a result, there is a trade-off between free-to-air advantage over other teams. However, collective catalyst for growth. To maximise this (FTA) and Pay TV platforms. Pay TV broadcasters selling of rights has the potential to generate opportunity, key stakeholders need to are more likely to pay higher rights fees, significantly higher overall commercial returns have a clear vision and define what they want but FTA broadcasters have a much greater and high quality brand consistency, a strategy the women’s game to become and develop viewership thus increasing the opportunity to common in US sports including the National a strategy to achieve this vision. Women’s grow interest in the game and deliver greater Women’s Soccer League (NWSL), which has a professional football is in its early stages of value to sponsors. A media rights deal that kit sponsorship with Nike that covers all teams. development and through working together and encompasses both FTA and Pay TV is a potential Whilst this close collaboration would be alien learning from the experiences of men’s football compromise. For example, MediaPro’s €3m per to other industries (in which competitors do and other sports, stakeholders of women’s The Sports Business Group at Deloitte season for the rights to broadcast Spain’s top not depend on each other for success), joint football (clubs, players, competition organisers, has worked with rights holders across tier of women’s football will show some games sponsorship deals are possible in the sports sponsors and the media among others) have multiple sports and geographies to assist on FTA and some on Pay TV. As consumption industry and could lead to higher overall an opportunity to shape its future trajectory them in developing the key foundations of trends move towards OTT and social media, commercial revenues for women’s football. so that women’s football becomes the world’s their competition including competition these platforms are increasingly important for leading professional women’s sport. structure, regulations and governance, rights holders to attract and retain fans and media rights and sponsorship strategy. should also form a core role within any media rights strategy.

23 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Football League clubs

Football League clubs

2017/18 saw a fifth successive season of For Hull City, parachute payments accounted for By contrast, Leeds United was the most The 18 consistent Championship clubs from revenue growth in the Championship. 75% of total revenue. The impact on the other successful Championship club at generating the 2016/17 season saw revenue fall by £25m, Clubs generated record revenues of £749m, two newly relegated clubs, Middlesbrough and matchday and commercial revenue (c.£16.5m in largely due to parachute payments either ending a 4% rise on 2016/17. The increase was , was still significant, accounting for each category), accounting for just over 80% of (Reading) or tapering (QPR and Norwich) and the largely driven by an increase in parachute over 65% of total revenue for both clubs. its total revenue. hole not being filled by other revenue streams. payments as the re-structured payment schedule moved into its second season. It is Parachute payments continue to be the key estimated that revenue remained relatively Chart 13: Football League clubs’ revenues – factor in driving revenue differentials across the static in the 2018/19 season. A new broadcast A league of its own 2016/17 and 2017/18 (£m) Championship. The average revenue of a club rights deal is starting in the 2019/20 season, in receipt of parachute payments was £51m reportedly providing a 35% increase in value While parachute payments create 800 compared to £21m for those not in receipt. on the current deal, which will provide the financial polarisation amongst the 749 Revenue generated by League 1 clubs remained 720 next boost to Championship revenues. Championship, the revenue gap goes 700 static at £146m and this was also the case in beyond the division, and is increasing League 2 with revenue stable at £91m. both from the top of the Championship to 600 Football League clubs’ revenue the bottom of the Premier League and Consistent with 2016/17, broadcast revenue from the bottom of the Championship to The value of promotion (including parachute payments) accounted for the top of League 1. The gap between the 200 over 50% of total revenue, with matchday and average revenue for a relegated Premier As the new Premier League broadcast 146 146 commercial revenue making up 23% each in League club and a promoted 100 rights cycle begins in the 2019/20 season, 91 91 2017/18. Aston Villa was the highest revenue Championship club has increased from the value of broadcast distributions to generating club in the Championship and £43m in 2012/13 to £94m in 2017/18, clubs will remain reasonably static with 0 2016/17 2017/18 reported £66m with over 50% coming from while the gap between the average wage parachute payments unlikely to see any parachute payments. bill for a relegated Championship club Average revenue per club significant growth. Gaining promotion to and promoted League 1 club has 30 6 4 31 6 4 the Premier League will generate a revenue Parachute payments in respect of recent increased from £13m to £21m across the uplift similar to the 2017/18 season of at relegation from the Premier League accounted same period. This potentially makes it Championship League 1 League 2 least £170m, based on Premier League for 32% of total revenue in 2017/18 in the more challenging for promoted clubs to distributions and guaranteed parachute Championship. Eight Championship clubs were become established in the Premier Source: Deloitte analysis. payments if relegated, rising to at least in receipt of parachute payments, ranging from League and Championship without £300m if the promoted clubs survive £17m to £42m and totalling £243m, the highest further investment. more than one season. total amount ever paid in a single season.

24 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Football League clubs

Championship clubs’ record revenue was Chart 14: Football League clubs’ revenues and wage costs – 2016/17 and 2017/18 (£m) coupled with record wage costs of £795m In the mixer in the 2017/18 season, a 12% increase on 1,000 ChampionshipLeague 1League 2 Revenue the 2016/17 season. The wages/revenue Despite the overall Spearman’s rank 795 720 ratio also increased from 99% to 106%, coefficient only indicating a moderate 750 749 Wage costs Revenue 712 highlighting the increasing level of positive correlation between wages and financial risk that Championship clubs are final league position, there is a stronger Wages/revenue ratio Wage costs 500 willing to take in order to chase promotion relationship amongst the top six and to the Premier League. In the Football bottom three of the league. The top six Average wage costs perWa clubges/revenue ratio League as a whole wages rose above teams in the league all came from the top 250 146 146 91 91 123 137 Average wage costs £1 billion for the first time. The worsening seven highest wage spenders, and whilst 65 71 (from an already poor position) of heavy promotion bonus payments will 0 16/17 17/18 16/17 17/18 16/17 17/18 Source: Deloitte analysis. per club Championship wage control dates back to skew promoted clubs towards also being 99% 106% 84% 94% 71% 78% the 2012/13 season, the first year after the higher spenders this is still a notable Source: Deloitte analysis. vast increase in Premier League broadcast correlation. Barnsley and Burton Albion, 30 33 5 6 3 3 revenues for 2013/14 was announced. both relegated, were the two lowest wage spenders in the division although Sunderland was a significant outlier, A moderate positive correlation between Football League clubs’ wage costs finishing 24th with the eighth highest wages and final league position was evident in Gambling on going up Aston Villa had the highest wage costs in the wage spend. The remaining 15 league 2017/18. The Spearman’s rank coefficient for Championship in 2017/18 of £73m, more places actually showed a negative the Championship is 0.47, down slightly from Excluding Newcastle United, the wages/ than seven times that of Burton Albion (which correlation between wage spend and final 0.5. This further demonstrates that the default revenue ratio was 95% in 2016/17, a recorded the lowest wages spend, at just under league position, i.e. the more clubs spent, setting for almost all Championship clubs to tentative indication that the Championship £10m). Aston Villa’s wages bill was the third the lower they finished. This indicates that spend on wages in pursuit of success is not may be edging towards a more stable and highest ever recorded in the Championship, wage spend is highly related to finishing in reliably rewarded by on-field performances. sustainable future. However, 2017/18 has behind Newcastle United’s £112m in 2016/17 the top six or in the relegation positions, seen a wages/revenue ratio of 106% as and Queens Park Rangers’ £75m in 2013/14. but unrelated to finishing position in the 2017/18 saw League 1 clubs’ wages rise 11% to clubs continue to increase wage spend as The average wages spend per club was £33m, remaining league positions. £137m and the wages/revenue ratio from 84% they seek promotion. City had the an increase from £30m in 2016/17. to 94%, eclipsing the previous high of 93% seen sixth highest wage spend in 2017/18 as it in 2011/12. League 2 wages rose 9% to £71m gained automatic promotion to the Only three of the 18 consistent Championship 12 clubs had a wages spend greater than in 2017/18, causing the wages/revenue ratio Premier League, while also disclosing £23m clubs from 2016/17 reported a decrease in total revenue in 2017/18, with three nearing a to rise to 78%, the highest since the 2000/01 in bonuses and other commitments due their wages spend in 2017/18, the remainder wages/revenue ratio of 200% ( City season. The Salary Cost Management Protocol following promotion. Looking forward, this increasing by an average of 37% (£10m). This (194%), Wanderers (192%) and regulations have been credited with keeping type of heavily incentivised wage structure demonstrates the scale and widespread nature Reading (186%)). In Wolverhampton Wanderers wage spending under control in recent years but may be a more responsible and sustainable of the financial outlay being made in a bid to case this risk paid off as the club gained an there are signs that clubs, especially in League 1, way for Championship clubs to control reach the Premier League. automatic promotion. In contrast, during the are pushing the boundaries more than has their wage spending, ensuring that if the 2018/19 season, Birmingham City has been been seen in recent years. club does not gain promotion it is not left sanctioned by the Football League for breaching with potentially unsustainable levels of profitability and sustainability rules. wage expenditure.

25 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Football League clubs

Given record wage spending, it is no Chart 15: Championship clubs’ losses – 2013/14 to 2017/18 (£m) surprise that Championship clubs recorded That Golden Rule 0 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 record operating losses for the third successive season, increasing significantly In 2016 we noted that the Championship’s (60) by 25% to £361m. Championship clubs -50 Number of clubs generating Financial Fair Play Rules, first implemented pre-tax losses increased by 54% to £320m, from the 2013/14 season, had helped 2 operating profit/pre-tax profit the second highest level ever recorded. clubs to limit their losses. We also rued the -100 Average club operating loss/ 6 (3) changes to be effective from 2016/17 5 pre-tax loss (8) season, as part of a wider agreement (9) Football League clubs’ losses -150 between the Football League and the 3 (196) Only two Championship clubs (Burton Albion and (208) Premier League, whereby the Championship (10) Hull City) reported both operating and pre-tax -200 (225) clubs would instead be subject to the profits. Only three other clubs reported profits (234) more thinly constructed and untested 4 on either measure in 2017/18. 12 clubs reported 1 (253) Profitability and Sustainability (P&S) Rules -250 operating losses of over £10m with the average (248) (13) that allow clubs to have higher losses. (9) 1 (289) operating loss across the league being £15m, 1 (320) highlighting the financial risks that clubs are willing -300 (11) In 2019 Birmingham City became the first (10) 5 Profit/(loss) before tax to take to gain promotion to the Premier League. club to be deducted points for its failure to (12) (361) -350 Operating profit/(loss) comply with the P&S Rules, given Wolverhampton Wanderers recorded both the 3 excessive spending over the three highest operating loss (£49m) and highest pre- financial years covering the 2015/16 to -400 (15) tax loss (£57m) in the Championship. Combined 2017/18 seasons. Given the reported with Cardiff City and , the other two losses of other clubs in the Championship Notes: The operating result is the net of promoted clubs, these accounted for 31% of the Analysis of Championship clubs’ cash flow revenues less wage costs and other operating in 2017/18 and/or 2018/19, it appears that Championship clubs’ total operating losses and statements also shows they were net spenders costs. The operating result excludes player several clubs will require profit-generating almost half of pre-tax losses. as a whole over the season. trading and certain exceptional items, which transactions in their financial year ending are included in the pre-tax result, along with in 2019 in order to achieve technical other costs such as financing costs. Hull City reported the highest pre-tax profit 2017/18 has seen League 1 clubs’ pre-tax losses compliance with the P&S Rules. in the division of £24m, largely as a result of a more than double, from £36m in 2016/17 to The 2013/14 pre-tax loss included a one-off £31m profit on player transfers. £81m. This has largely been driven by club credit of £60m at Queens Park Rangers. The Consternation has been expressed 2014/15 pre-tax loss included one-off credits mix with Rovers and Wigan Athletic amongst the clubs about some aspects of of £26m at Cardiff City and £11m at Reading. Norwich City also reported a pre-tax profit of entering the league and generating combined The 2015/16 pre-tax loss included one-off the P&S Rules. Effective cost control £18m despite generating operating losses of £7m losses similar in size to the League 1 total from credits of £170m at Bolton Wanderers, £18m regulations in the top two divisions of as a result of a £50m profit on player transfers. 2016/17. However, pre-tax losses amongst at Nottingham Forest, £12m at Derby County, English football, will in the future require and £10m at Cardiff City. The 2016/17 pre-tax All but two of the Championship clubs that the 17 consistent League 1 clubs also rose, loss included a one-off credit of £40m at an holistic approach to implement reported generated a profit on sale of player more than doubling to £37m, underpinned by Nottingham Forest. The 2017/18 pre-tax loss robustly defined rules and an overall registrations, but that profit was balanced out Charlton Athletic reporting an £11m increase. included one-off credits of £40m at Derby regulatory framework to facilitate, across the division as a whole by amortisation League 2 clubs’ pre-tax losses decreased to County, £8m at Sunderland, and £5m at monitor and enforce compliance by clubs. Nottingham Forest. of player transfer fees meaning a net nil £10m from £18m in 2016/17, over 50% of this contribution to profits from player trading. decrease being due to club mix. Source: Deloitte analysis.

26 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Football League clubs

Perhaps surprisingly in light of the previous Total cash reserves have increased from £11m Chart 16: Championship clubs’ net debt – 2018 (£m) analysis, 2017/18 saw Championship clubs’ to £71m at the end of the 2017/18 season, aggregate net debt fall significantly, down largely driven by changes in club mix which 100 47% to £963m, bringing Championship account for £49m of the £60m increase. Of the 58 net debt below £1 billion for the first time consistent Championship clubs, Norwich City 50 since the summer of 2012. The impact of increased its cash reserves by £16m, in part (20) (7) 2 3 1 4 3 2 clubs promoted to and relegated from the due to the success of the innovative Canaries 0 Championship, coupled with significant Bond that invited supporters and investors to debt to equity conversions at a number of financially contribute to the construction of a (52) (53) (63) (56) clubs, accounts for the vast majority of this new academy, raising £5m. -50 (75) (22) (18) (71) (73)

y (90) reduction. Interest-free soft loans from (81) (94) shareholders constituted 78% of total net -100 (116) h debt, the same level as at the end of the Hull Cit Brentfor d Bristol Cit y 2016/17 season, highlighting the fact that Cardiff City Owners’ actions -150 Championship clubs continue to be heavily Reading Total Total Birmingham Cit y 2018 2017 Queens Park Ranger s funded by their owners. Behind the scenes, the English Football Ipswich Town Middlesbroug League continues to monitor clubs’ finances -200 13 (45) (145) and use the interventionist measures at its Wolverhampton Wanderer s Football League clubs’ net debt disposal. A number of clubs have been on -250 (225) (352) Of the total net debt amongst Championship the brink, and in May 2019 Bolton Net cash/bank Net debt clubs, 82% (£786m) is held by ten clubs, with Wanderers became the first Football borrowings -300 (751) (1,415) Reading, Ipswich and Middlesbrough all League club to enter Administration since Other clubs reporting net debt in excess of £100m. After Town in 2013. (116) (101) (101) (73) (71) (71) (70) (69) (60) (54) (177) (963) (1,812) Other loans its previous owner waived £170m of soft loans in 2016, Bolton Wanderers’ net debt was lower Owners’ actions have contributed to some Soft loans (0) (1) (2) (0)(8) (1)1(1)(3) 5 (12) (22) (14) than the vast majority of Championship clubs. frantic times for fans of other clubs such as Its financial struggles in 2018/19 stem more Blackpool, Bury, Charlton Athletic and from its operating cash outflows and insufficient Coventry City. Evolution of the rulebooks supplementary funding. and more positive communication about 2017/18 (243)saw(213) (126) (64) (51) (47) (46) (40) (21) Net cash/bank borrowings the regulation of clubs will be required to Other loans Bank loans continue to be a relatively enhance perceptions of English football’s Championship clubs’ Soft loans uncommon form of financing in the governance. Net debt Championship, and only three clubs have this aggregate net debt Net finance costs form of debt. Total bank loans increased slightly to £58m from £56m at summer 2017, Bristol fall significantly, down Source: Deloitte analysis. City’s bank loans still form the vast majority of this total with just under £50m. 47% to £963m.

27 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Player transfers

Player transfers

Two record transfer windows in 2017/18, Chart 17: Premier League and Football League clubs’ player transfer payments – 2017/18 (£m) driven predominantly by Premier League Note: Arrows represent the flow Reforms to the transfer clubs who spent a record £2.4 billion, of transfer payments, with players system outweighing the reduction in transfer moving in the opposite direction. £1,354m expenditure by Football League clubs, The estimated fees in respect of the Football’s stakeholders are currently Premier League clubs transfer of player registrations refer resulted in a record of £1.2 billion leaving working together on major reforms to the Within PL clubs to amounts committed in 2017/18, English clubs in relation to transfers, £657m £444m rather than actual cashflows. The player transfer system to increase its Non-English sources for the amounts in the with clubs paying premiums to import clubs transparency, protect its integrity and foreign talent. Premier League total chart relate to periods that are not reinforce solidarity mechanisms. £2,352m necessarily coterminous. Proposed future changes include creating £92m Source: Premier League; Football League; Football Association; Premier League clubs’ transfer activity £130m £45m a clearing house for transfer money flows, The Premier League saw a transfer expenditure Deloitte analysis. introducing electronic transfer and £44m record of £2.4 billion, a substantial increase of registration systems at national level, a

47%. The central distributions from the Premier £211m Football League return to licensing of agents, capping League afford clubs the ability to acquire talent clubs agents’ fees, restrictions on player loans, Within FL clubs at premiums that can only be matched by a solidarity contributions to apply to Agents £117m relatively small number of clubs internationally. domestic transfers with an ‘international Football League total dimension’, and introducing a luxury tax £300m Of the 17 clubs in the Premier League in both £47m on ‘excessive’ transfer spending. This also the 2016/17 and 2017/18 seasons, the average presents an opportunity for FIFA to help transfer expenditure per club increased by the football sector to address financial £42m, with the three promoted clubs also seeing Player agents have benefitted from the marked in 2016/17, spent only £2m in the 2017/18 season, crime risks which could result in both an a year-on-year average increase of £33m as increase in expenditure, with amounts paid to which contributed to the overall reduction. corporate and personal liability under a they invested in talent in an attempt to secure agents increasing from £174m to £211m. growing body of laws and regulations. their position at the top of English football. In the Championship, there was a clear disparity Manchester City set a new Premier League Football League clubs’ transfer activity in expenditure between the eight clubs in receipt record for expenditure in a single season, Football League clubs saw their combined of Premier League parachute payments and spending £328m in the 2017/18 season, beating gross transfer expenditure fall by 9% to £300m those not, with clubs receiving said payments the previous record of £205m (Manchester from the 2016/17 season figure of £328m. spending an average of £18m in 2017/18 United in the 2016/17 season) by 60%. Championship club Aston Villa, who spent £88m compared with £9m by clubs who did not.

28 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Investing in the future

Changes of ownership are to important corporate, personal and political Changes of majority ownership of Premier Making informed decisions more prevalent amongst relationships, and excitement and emotional League and Championship clubs Based on the transaction history we have returns if on-pitch results go well. tracked and been involved in over the past 15 15 13 English football clubs than in 12 12 years, the enterprise value of Premier League any other European market. With all Premier League clubs ranking in the 10 and Championship club transactions (being world’s top 40 for club revenues, they are 10 the aggregate value of equity plus net debt, PL economically strong participants in the global 6 commonly used to describe the takeover value 5 There have been over 50 changes of majority transfer market to bring-in some of the world’s of a club) has typically been at a multiple of 1.4 5 Champ ownership amongst Premier League and top football stars and, at the top end, capable of to 1.8 times a club’s annual revenue. In every Championship clubs since 2005. Contributing competing strongly in UEFA club competitions case there are unique buy-side and sell-side to this churn, English football attracts more as clearly demonstrated in the 2018/19 season. 0 2005-09 2010-14 2015-19 circumstances in respect of each change of foreign interest than elsewhere. At the end of Premier League Championship ownership and a consequent mix of economic the 2018/19 season around 60% of clubs in the Some investors target clubs lower down and emotional drivers of enterprise value. Note: Covers transactions in the period from top two divisions had a foreign owner. the pyramid, given football’s deep history 2005 to May 2019. in communities across England and the With sustained global interest from fans, The attraction for investors prospect of promotion to the top division. Source: Deloitte analysis. broadcasters and commercial partners, there The Premier League’s multi-billion broadcast However, whilst the initial cost of investment will continue to be significant investor interest rights arrangements are a key driver for is much lower, owner injections can add up Alongside the prospect of capital appreciation in English clubs. Amidst the haste and high investors’ interest. From 2019/20 these rights over seasons striving for promotion with no of football clubs’ values, the remarkable emotion of a transaction, we advise potential will generate around £3 billion per season for guarantee of success. turnaround in profitability of Premier League investors to understand the commercial the Premier League. Not only do these rights clubs since 2013/14, influenced by UEFA’s cost realities of their proposed investment, ensure deliver substantial and secure annual revenue Evolving global investor interest control regulations as well as revenue growth, no unpleasant surprises, and have a clear for clubs, they also give access to a global The transactions history and observed investor has also sparked greater interest from more funding and strategic plan for the club’s future. television audience eager to watch the interest in English football has been, and profit-orientated investors. Nonetheless, the clubs and players competing for ten months continues to be, particularly strong from US- potential financial implications of a club’s poor The Sports Business Group at Deloitte each year in what many consider to be “the based investors, including those with existing on-pitch performance, in particular relegation, has been involved in around 100 Financial world’s most exciting league”. For some owners, ownership interests in sports teams. Chinese remains an off-putting risk. In respect of Advisory projects in the world of sport over matches broadcast to one billion homes across investment in European football was prevalent in other sports there is a growing attraction for the past 15 years.

190 countries provides a global opportunity that 2016/17, including acquisitions of six English clubs. investors to exert greater control of broadcast can be exploited through new marketing and However, Chinese investor interest in football and commercial rights, for example in rugby, commercial arrangements. For others, owning has diminished since efforts to curb capital flight motorsports and tennis. So far, similar reported such a trophy asset may provide them with from the country emerged in late 2016. ideas in respect of European or World football useful media and business exposure, access have not come to fruition. 29 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Stadia

Stadia

Total attendance for the Premier League Six clubs (Manchester United, Arsenal, West Chart 18: Premier League and Football League clubs’ average matchday attendances – and Football League clubs nudged up Ham United, Tottenham Hotspur, Manchester 2013/14 to 2018/19 (000s) to 32.9m in 2018/19 following 32.8m City and Liverpool) each had a total attendance in 2017/18 which was the highest total of over 1m across their 19 home Premier League 50 Premier League attendance across the four divisions in games. Together their attendance represents 38.5 38.4 0% almost 60 years. However, the same cannot 46% of total Premier League attendance. 40 36.2 36.5 35.8 Championship be said of each individual division. League Despite finishing sixth and recording their 1 attendance grew by 11%, League 2 and lowest total attendance since 2005/06, League 1 30 Premier League attendance remained Manchester United continue to outperform 2% stable and Championship attendance fell other clubs in terms of total attendance. 20.2 20.5 20.0 League 2 17.9 17.6 by 2%. 20 Of all 20 Premier League clubs, the three % change on 2017/18 8.0 7.8 8.7 11% promoted clubs saw the greatest increases 10 7.2 7.2 Premier League clubs’ attendances in average attendance: Cardiff City (up 56%), 4.7 5.0 4.9 4.5 4.5 0% For the 2018/19 season total attendance Fulham (up 18%) and Wolverhampton Source: Premier League; Football 0 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 remained stable at 14.6m. Tottenham Hotspur’s Wanderers (up 10%) showing the draw of the League; Deloitte analysis. average attendance decreased compared with world’s leading football league. Whilst overall Stadium utilisation the previous season with the club moving to attendance was slightly lower than the previous 96% 96% 96% 96% 97% their new stadium later than expected, meaning season, average stadium utilisation nudged they continued to play home matches at slightly up 1% to 97%, resulting in an average 68% 65% 72% 73% 73% Wembley Stadium. matchday attendance of just over 38,000. 46% 47% 50% 51% 57%

However, the extension to their deal with Championship clubs’ attendances 48% 51% 47% 42% 40% Wembley National Stadium Ltd meant that Total attendance (excluding play-off matches) from 24 November 2018 they had to play most reduced by 2% to 11.1m in 2018/19 compared of their home domestic games at a reduced with the previous season resulting in an Average stadium utilisation was similar capacity of 51,000 (Wembley’s full capacity is average attendance per game of 20,047. to 2017/18 (both 73%) although there 90,000). The last five home Premier League The main driver of this was the departure of was a significant range amongst the 24 games were played at their new stadium with a Wolverhampton Wanderers (promoted) and clubs. In 2018/19 Hull City had the lowest capacity of 62,062. Sunderland (relegated) at the end of the 2017/18 stadium utilisation (45%) and Norwich City season with those teams having the third and (Championship winners) achieved the highest fourth highest attendance respectively in the with 95%. Championship in 2017/18. 30 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Stadia

League 1 and League 2 clubs’ attendances Chart 19: Impact of relegation on attendances for Premier League and Football Legaue clubs Total attendance in League 1 increased by 11% to 4.8m driven by the arrival of Sunderland, 35,000 Barnsley and Coventry City all of whom were in the top five for attendance in League 1 in 30,000

2018/19. Sunderland achieved the highest 32,157

aggregate attendance (739,605) averaging 29,280 25,000 32,157 per game. This was significantly greater 27,729

than the next highest club who 25,200 24,534 achieved an average attendance of 17,392. 20,000 24,107 20,623

Total attendance in League 2 was 2.5m, 15,000 18,758 remaining stable compared to the prior season. Whilst Coventry City (highest attendance 10,000 13,668 in 2017/18) were promoted to League 1 for 12,516 4,643 9,256 2018/19, League 2 saw the arrival of Milton 4,099 4,136 8,265 Keynes Dons (relegated from League 1) and 5,000 3,352 2,113 1,354 5,841 5,359 5,054 5,100 4,817

Tranmere Rovers (promoted from National 4,504

League) both of whom achieved strong 0 Swansea Stoke West Bromwich Barnsley Burton Sunderland Oldham Northampton Milton Bury Barnet Chesterfield attendances in 2018/19. City City Albion Albion Athletic Town Keynes Dons

Stadium utilisation of League 1 and League 2017/18 2018/19 2 clubs was 57% and 40% respectively, significantly lower than the Championship (73%) European attendances Of the clubs relegated at Note: Clubs shown in order of and the Premier League (97%). The Bundesliga achieved the highest finishing position in 2017/18. attendance of the ‘big five’ European Leagues the end of the 2017/18 Impact of relegation in 2018/19 with an average attendance of over Source: Premier League; Football Of the clubs relegated at the end of the 2017/18 43,000, 13% higher than the Premier League. season, all bar three clubs League; Worldfootball.net; Deloitte season, all bar three clubs (Sunderland, had an average attendance analysis. Oldham Athletic and Bury) recorded a fall in of nearly 81,000, the highest of any of the clubs (Sunderland, Oldham attendance the following season. Barnet FC in the ‘big five’ European Leagues. (relegated from League 2) recorded the greatest Athletic and Bury) recorded proportionate fall in attendance (down 36%), The other three ‘big five’ leagues had lower closely followed by Burton Albion (relegated average attendances than the Bundesliga a fall in attendance the from the Championship) with a reduction in and the Premier League. Ligue 1 and La Liga attendance of 28%. Sunderland’s 16% increase attendances remained stable compared to following season. in attendance following relegation due to the previous season at c.22,500 and c.27,000 their significantly improved results in 2018/19, respectively. Serie A average attendance finishing fifth after a number of difficult seasons. increased, to over 25,000, a figure not achieved since 2003/04. Juventus experienced a 7%

31 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Stadia

increase in average attendance, most likely due Excluding Tottenham Hotspur, capital spending Chart 20: Premier League and Football to the arrival of , however, for the other 19 Premier League clubs in League clubs’ expenditure on stadia and Future capital Fiorentina and Lazio recorded the greatest 2017/18 was £115m, down 34% from £175m other facilities – 2016/17 and 2017/18 (£m) increases in attendance with both clubs in 2016/17. Three other clubs spent more expenditure recording over 120,000 more fans throughout. than £10m during 2017/18: Liverpool (£16m), 800 Given the significance of Tottenham

Manchester City (£11m) and Manchester United 690 Hotspur’s new stadium to the overall Capital expenditure (£11m). 700 2 11 capital expenditure figure it is expected 48 A record £629m was spent by Premier League that next season will see a reduction in clubs on capital expenditure in 2017/18, a Championship clubs spent £48m, a similar total 629 overall capital expenditure by Premier 600 59% increase on the amount spent in 2016/17. to 2016/17. Construction of Brentford’s new League and Football League clubs. Unsurprisingly, Tottenham Hotspur led stadium commenced in April 2018 resulting the way as they continued to invest heavily in the club reporting the highest capital 500 452 However, there are a number of clubs 3 6 in the construction of their new stadium, expenditure in the Championship (£10m). 48 undergoing or planning significant which officially opened on 3 April 2019 in a Fulham were the second highest spenders stadium or training ground projects. 400 395 Premier League match against Crystal Palace. (£6m) as they continued to develop plans for Construction of Liverpool’s new training Tottenham’s expenditure of £514m represented the BBC sports ground (anticipated to be used facility at Kirkby to co-locate the first 300 82% of the total capital expenditure across the as a satellite training ground for their U23 and team and academy (reported cost of Premier League clubs. U18 teams) purchased in June 2017 and for the £5m) commenced in September 2018 redevelopment of the Riverside Stand at 200 and is due to be completed for the start . of the 2020/21 season. Crystal Palace

100 are planning to build a new Main Stand Unsurprisingly, League 1 clubs spent a combined £11m, at Park which will see capacity up 84% on the previous year and League 2 increase from 26,000 to 34,000 at an 0 2016/17 2017/18 Tottenham Hotspur clubs spent £2m, down on the previous year. expected cost of between £75m and Portsmouth were the biggest spenders in £100m. Everton has acquired led the way as League 1, spending £3m including investment Premier League League 1 Bramley-Moore Dock (an iconic location in the infrastructure at , the on the banks of the River Mersey) and they continued to training ground facility at ROKO Health Club and Championship League 2 are intending to submit a planning investing in a new club shop and a large screen application in the second half of 2019 to invest heavily in the digital scoreboard. In League 2, Source: Deloitte analysis. build a new stadium. Argyle is re-developing its -style construction of their grandstand which is due to be completed by the It is not only Premier League clubs end of 2019. planning significant stadia investment, new stadium. Luton Town’s plans for their new town centre stadium (reported capacity of 23,000) were approved in January 2019.

32 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Stadium arcadium

Stadia of major clubs are significant revenue generating assets at, the stadium. The Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Readymade that can increase commercial and matchday revenue, if they Atlanta includes more than 2,200 HD TV screens There are, however, substantial barriers to to ensure every second of a game can be viewed improving the matchday experience, increasing adapt to evolving consumer demands and diversify activities. when not seated, whilst free wi-fi throughout the the number of events held and developing the stadium enables uninterrupted access to player stadium as a visitor attraction. Constructing They are visitor attractions, rather than simply Higher ground stats, social media and internet browsing. or adapting ultra-modern stadia is costly. existing to host football matches, catering for the Tottenham Hotspurs’ new stadium includes Some leading clubs have ageing facilities of needs of football and non-football fans through a ‘Sky Walk’ and its own microbrewery. These FC Barcelona announced their intention variable quality, with limited capacity or are their facilities and all-year round events. innovative features may help encourage to become the world’s first stadium with a constrained by challenges involving transport tourists to include Tottenham on their London dedicated 5G network. The speed, capacity, or local residents. Planning permission will be Transcending itinerary, generating commercial revenue on latency, and penetration of 5G should further required for stadium redevelopment and even Tottenham Hotspur’s multi-purpose stadium the 300+ non matchdays each year. Liverpool redefine the fan experience, both inside and to increase the number of events held. Some was designed with a retractable pitch and have recently adapted to allow for outside the stadium, with cameras able to clubs do not own their stadium and clubs may NFL-sized dressing rooms, with a ten-year concert equipment to be transported in and capture 360-degree images from within team not have the appropriate level of expertise and partnership with the NFL enabling the club out of the ground, whilst Schalke’s Veltins Arena buses and dressing rooms, providing greater experience in-house. Clubs need to prioritise to host a minimum of two matches per year. hosts the World Team Challenge, an annual access to players and managers. Clubs will be and plan, through calculating return on Deloitte’s economic impact studies show that competition, during the Bundesliga’s able to create deeper personal connections with investment and identifying ‘must- have’ versus less frequent, marquee events held at football winter break. These facilities and events attract fans on a matchday, with associated commercial ‘nice-to-have’ (or even superfluous) features in stadia such as NFL matches and major music a different profile of visitor and generate benefits from enhanced engagement and terms of the fan and visitor experience. concerts often generate greater expenditure additional income for clubs. personalisation. per spectator than Premier League matches. The Sports Business Group at Deloitte work Hard to concentrate Mobile apps that interact with stadia can identify closely with clubs and stadium owners These events attract a different catchment of fans, Clubs are concerned that younger audiences, what is important to a visitor and improve on solutions including stadium and event often from further afield, who spend more than a more accustomed to smartphone, tablet and the customer experience. Apps can deliver feasibility assessments, economic impact typical Premier League season ticket holder. The social media usage, are less likely to attend personalised content, for example, providing studies and stadium business plans. pull of an iconic stadium enables a club to work or watch a full football match than older digital signage that directs fans to kiosks with We conduct extensive market research with local tourism agencies to encourage longer generations. The competition for viewing time shorter queues or gives real-time updates on with fans to understand perceptions, stays and wider economic legacies. A recent is not only with other football clubs, but with available car parking. Through personalising and opportunities for product development, Deloitte study found that 94% of attendees at eSports, the internet and a myriad of other streamlining the matchday experience, clubs can optimum product price points and assist Liverpool matches who originated from outside forms of entertainment. The expectations of learn more about their customer base, offering with venue strategies. the local region said they would recommend younger generations are changing, and an price promotions or product recommendations others to visit, with more than a quarter of enhanced broader matchday experience may based on consumer habits. attendees likely to return to visit the city itself. be needed to attract them to, and engage them 33 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Commercial reality

With domestic broadcast rights values across Europe’s ‘Big five’ leagues’ commercial revenue 2003/04 to 2017/18 (€m)

‘big five’ leagues looking unlikely to grow at a similar rate 1,600 to that we have seen previously in the short-term, the 1,457 1,473 10% 1,400 1,382 7% emphasis is now on clubs to drive their own revenue growth 1,251 predominantly from matchday and commercial sources. 1,200 1,076 1,073 9% 1,000 954 Growth in matchday revenue is generally As a result of an increasingly cluttered 885 limited by the size and use of a club’s stadium. commercial market, potential partners are 779 766 749 Therefore, the most likely source of revenue becoming more selective of the properties, 800 705 710 8% growth and differentiation for clubs is through and also the platforms and channels, which 624 560 598 the successful exploitation of commercial they use to reach audiences. In particular, 568 572 558 562 665 666 5% 600 504 500 opportunities. the proliferation of digital channels and 463 471 457 432 501 523 development of the use of social media 373 405 335 347 has provided them with a growing number 400 399 327 Commercial market dynamics of options. However, the fragmentation of 286 295 252 Commercial revenue growth across the ‘big five’ audiences across these platforms does create 200 229 leagues has been considerable and consistent greater complexity for commercial partners in over the last 15 years. Commercial revenue is reaching target audiences. 0 03/04 05/06 07/08 09/10 11/12 13/14 15/16 17/18 also now the primary source of revenue for the top six clubs in our Money League. Sport, Therefore, a club’s understanding of, and ability and football in particular, retains an ability to to engage, monetise and activate, its fanbase is England Spain France Note: For Spain, France and drive an emotional connection with the public critical to a successful commercial partnership Germany the figures in this chart aggregate what are otherwise like few other genres or activities. Sponsorship and is a key factor in driving sponsorship rights Germany Italy X% CAGR 2003/04-2017/18 referred to as ‘sponsorship’ and of a football club, therefore, remains a highly value. As mentioned in last year’s edition, ‘commercial’ revenue streams. attractive tool for potential partners to utilise in providing commercial partners with access order to reach, connect and build affinity with to fan data such as age, gender, interest and Source: Deloitte analysis. target audiences. purchase history is one way of opening the football market to a new group of sponsors and allowing for more valuable insights and meaningful relationships between parties. 34 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Digital technology – linked to Maximising value of existing assets innovation above, continuing – understanding the catalogue of advancements of technology present inventory available to package into many potential opportunities for clubs in propositions and partnerships, is key opening up new markets and sponsors. in managing and driving value across Effective use of technology can also the overall portfolio. In particular, enhance the level of engagement recognising the impact of high-profile with fans via social media and other players on a club’s commercial profile digital platforms. For example, Bayern has proved lucrative for a number of ’s using augmented reality within clubs in recent years, including Paris the FC Bayern App, whilst the evolving Saint-Germain (Mbappé and Neymar) market of esports can also expand and Juventus (Ronaldo). Additionally, recognising that a commercial Approach of football clubs the audiences and provide stronger partnership goes far beyond a monetary In recent years, many clubs have become more activation for clubs and sponsors. With reference to the above market trends and transaction and aligning a club’s propositions adaptive and responsive to the demands of the dynamics, implementing a clear coherent long- with the needs and values of a potential market and have broadened the horizons of Globalisation – international markets term strategy is key for football clubs and sports partner is a fundamental part of a successful their commercial strategy, particularly in respect remain a key source of growth for many rights holders alike. commercial strategy in such a competitive of some of the following key market themes: of Europe’s elite clubs. Many of these market. Brands are adopting increasingly clubs have sought to capitalise on sophisticated methods in order to seek return Innovation – the creation of innovative their international popularity and have The Sports Business Group at Deloitte are on their investment. partnerships, such as Paris Saint- prioritised building their presence in assisting various stakeholders in sport Germain’s co-branding initiative with overseas markets, particularly in Asia to deepen their understanding of the Aligning a club’s propositions Air Jordan, which has seen the iconic and the United States. commercial sports market and develop their with the needs and values ‘Jumpman’ logo appear on a football shirt commercial strategies. for the first time in 2018/19, can be a key Maximising value of existing of a potential partner is driver of commercial revenue growth. partnerships – the ability to understand a fundamental part of a For those clubs outside of Europe’s and adapt to the needs of existing elite, innovative arrangements can be commercial partners to provide greater successful commercial strategy key to delivering enhanced commercial value can be beneficial for clubs. Building in such a competitive market. growth and a source of differentiation in on existing relationships and satisfying a heavily congested market. existing commercial partners may provide the best source of commercial growth upon contract renewals. 35 Annual Review of Football Finance 2019 | Sports Business Group

Basis of preparation

Sources of information We have not performed any The financial results of some clubs Key terms Pre-tax profit/loss is the operating Bank borrowings is debt advanced The financial results and financial verification work or audited any of have changed, or may in the future Revenue includes matchday, result plus/minus amortisation by lenders in the form of term loans, position of English football clubs for the financial information contained change, due to the change in basis of broadcast, sponsorship and of player registrations and other overdrafts or hybrid products, net 2017/18, and comparisons between in the financial statements or other accounting practice. In some cases commercial revenues. Revenue intangible assets, profit/loss on of any positive cash balance. Other them, has been based on figures sources in respect of each club for these changes may be significant. excludes player transfer fees, VAT player disposals, certain disclosed loans includes securitisation and extracted from the latest available the purpose of this publication. and other sales related taxes. exceptional items, and finance player finance monies, bonds and company or group statutory financial The number of clubs in the top income/costs. convertible loan stock, intercompany statements in respect of each club – division of each country can vary Matchday revenue is largely derived loans and loans from related parties which were either sent to us by the Comparability over time. In respect of the ‘big five’ from gate receipts (including Under UK GAAP and IFRS, the that are not otherwise soft loans. club or obtained from Companies Clubs are not wholly consistent with leagues for 2017/18, each division general admission and premium costs to a club of acquiring a Soft loans includes amounts from House. In general, if available to us, each other in the way they record had 20 clubs except for Germany tickets). Broadcast revenue includes player’s registration from another related parties with no interest the figures are extracted from the and classify financial transactions. (18 clubs). distributions received from club should be capitalised on the charged. annual financial statements of the In some cases we have made participation in domestic league balance sheet within intangible fixed legal entity registered in the United adjustments to a club’s figures The figures for some comparative and cups and from European club assets. Generally, the capitalised Kingdom which is at, or closest to, to enable, in our view, a more years have been re-stated compared competitions. Unless sponsorship amount is subsequently amortised Exchange rates the ‘top’ of the ownership structure meaningful comparison of the to previous editions of this report revenue is separately disclosed, over the period of the respective For the purpose of the international in respect of each club. The vast football business on a club by club due to changes in estimates commercial revenue includes player’s contract with the club. The analysis and comparisons we have majority of English clubs have an basis and over time. For example, arising from additional information sponsorship, merchandising and potential market value of ‘home- converted the figures for 2017/18 annual financial reporting period where information was available to available to us and/or due to the other commercial operations. Where grown’ players is excluded from into euros using the average ending in May, June or July. us, significant non-football activities actual restatement by clubs of their identifiable from a club’s disclosures, intangible fixed assets as there is exchange rate for the year ending or capital transactions have been annual financial statements. distributions received in respect of no acquisition cost. Amortisation of 30 June 2018 (£1 = €1.13); for years The financial results and financial excluded from revenue. central commercial revenues are player registrations is as disclosed prior to 2017/18 comparative figures position of clubs in various non- included in commercial revenue, in a club’s accounts, increased by as extracted from previous editions English leagues, and comparisons Some differences between clubs, or Financial projections or otherwise included in broadcast any provisions for impairment of the of this report; and the figures for between them, has been based on over time, may arise due to different Our projected results are based on revenue. value of player’s registrations. years since 2017/18 converted into figures extracted from the company commercial arrangements and how a combination of upcoming figures euros using the average exchange or group financial statements the transactions are recorded in the known to us (for example, central Wage costs includes wages, Net debt/funds is as disclosed in rate for the 10 months ending in respect of each club, or from financial statements (for example, distributions to clubs) and other, in salaries, signing-on fees, bonuses, financial statements (where shown) 30 April 2019 (£1 = €1.13). information provided to us by in respect of merchandising and our view, reasonable assumptions. termination payments, social or is an aggregation of certain national associations/leagues. hospitality arrangements), due security contributions and other figures from the balance sheet. The to different financial reporting In relation to estimates and employee benefit expenses. Unless net debt/funds figure in the financial If financial statements were not perimeters in respect of a club, and/ projections actual results are likely otherwise stated, wage costs are the statements has been adjusted in available to us for all clubs in a or due to different ways in which to be different from those projected total for all employees (including, some cases to aid comparability, division, then aggregate divisional accounting practice is applied such because events and circumstances players, technical and administrative such as the inclusion of related party totals have been estimated for all that the same type of transaction frequently do not occur as expected, employees). debt. Net debt/funds includes net clubs for comparison purposes (from might be recorded in different ways. and those differences may be cash/ bank borrowings, other loans, year to year or between divisions). material. Deloitte can give no Operating profit/loss is the net and soft loans. Each club’s financial information assurance as to whether, or how of revenue less wage costs and This publication contains a variety has been prepared on the basis of closely, the actual results ultimately other operating costs, excluding of information derived from publicly national accounting practices or achieved will correspond to those amortisation of player registrations available or other direct sources, International Financial Reporting projected and no reliance should be and other intangible assets, profit/ other than financial statements. Standards (“IFRS”). placed on such projections. loss on player disposals, certain disclosed exceptional items, and finance income/costs.

36 Annual Review of Football Finance 2017 | Section title goes here

37 Annual Review of Football Finance 2017 | Section title goes here

This publication has been written in general terms and we recommend that you obtain professional advice before acting or refraining from action on any of the contents of this publication. Deloitte LLP accepts no liability for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication.

Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 1 New Street Square, London EC4A 3HQ, United Kingdom.

Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom affiliate of Deloitte NWE LLP, a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”). DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL and Deloitte NWE LLP do not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

© 2019 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.

Graphic design: www.heliographic.co.uk 38