DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Distribution of Regeneration and Asexual Reproduction in Annelida: Fission Evolves in Regenerative Clades

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Supplementary Data – Invertebrate Biology Phylogenetic distribution of regeneration and asexual reproduction in Annelida: fission evolves in regenerative clades Eduardo E. Zattara1,2, 3 and Alexandra E. Bely3 1Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th and Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20560‐0163, USA 2Department of Biology, 915 E. Third Street, Myers Hall 150, Bloomington, IN 47405‐7107, USA 3Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 U.S.A. Literature references for regeneration and agametic reproduction in Annelida Basal and incertae sedis families Oweniidae: (Oliver 1984, Coulon et al. 1989, Dupin et al. 1991) Chaetopteridae: (Potts 1914, Berrill 1928, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Nishi & Arai 1996, Bhaud 1998) Sipuncula: (Rajulu & Krishnan 1969, Rice 1970) Amphinomidae: (Kudenov 1974, Müller et al. 2003, Cosentino & Giacobbe 2011, Arias et al. 2013a, Ahrens et al. 2014) Dinophilidae: (Schultz 1902, Ruebush 1940) Aeolosomatidae: (Herlant‐Meewis 1950a, b, 1953, 1964, Brinkhurst & Jamieson 1971, Lasserre 1975) 1 Errantia Protodrilidae & Saccocirridae: (Dawydoff 1954) Dorvilleidae: (Czwiklitzer 1905, Pfannenstiel 1973, 1974, Åkesson & Rice 1992, Müller & Henning 2004) Eunicidae: (Hofmann 1969, 1974, Pfannenstiel 1974, Bely 2006) Onuphidae: (Pflugfelder 1928, Fauchald 1982, Bailey‐Brock 1984, Paxton 1993, Safarik et al. 2006, Budaeva & Fauchald 2008, Berke et al. 2009, Pires et al. 2010, 2012) Syllidae: (Langerhans 1879, Malaquin 1893, Mesnil 1901, Allen 1923, Okada 1929, 1933, Abeloos 1952, Kudenov 1974, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Heacox & Schroeder 1982, Franke 1999, Glasby et al. 2012, Aguado et al. 2014) Polynoidae: (Daly 1973) Polygordidae: (Dawydoff 1954) Nephtyidae: (Michel 1898, Sayles 1936, Abeloos 1950a, b, Clark & Clark 1959) Hesionidae:(Morgulis 1909) Nereididae:(Michel 1898, Harms 1948, Casanova 1955, Durchon 1956, Hauenschild 1960, Brusca & Brusca 1990, Niwa et al. 2013) Phyllodocidae:(Michel 1898, Brusca & Brusca 1990) Glyceridae: (Neillis 1965) Sedentaria – non-Clitellata Orbiniidae: (Michel 1898, Probst 1931, Meyer et al. 2007) Siboglinidae: (Miyamoto et al. 2014) Cirratulidae: (Caullery & Mesnil 1898, Mesnil 1901, McIntosh 1915, Martin 1933, Berkeley & Berkeley 1954, Berrill 1961, Knox 1971, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Petersen 1999, Weidhase et al. 2015) Ctenodrilidae: (Scharff 1887, Monticelli 1910, Korschelt 1919, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Petersen 1999) Sabellidae: (Krøyer 1856, Vaney & Conte 1899, Watson 1906, Caullery & Mesnil 1920, Rioja 1929, Berrill 1931, 1952, 1978, Stone 1933a, Herlant‐Meewis 1964, Hill 1972, Knight‐Jones 1983, Jones‐Knight & Bowden 1984, Gambi et al. 2000, Fitzhugh 2003, Tovar‐Hernández & Pineda‐Vera 2008, Licciano et al. 2012, Arias et al. 2013b, Kolbasova et al. 2013, Murray et al. 2013, Tovar‐Hernández & Dean 2014, Mastrototaro et al. 2015) 2 Serpulidae: (Kupriyanova et al. 2001, Zeleny 1901, Faulkner 1930, Cresp 1952, George 1974, Kudenov 1974, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Uchida 1978, Pernet 2001, Jones‐Knight & Bowden 1984, Ben‐Eliafiu & Ten Hove 1989, Berrill & Mees 1936, Licciano et al. 2015, Pillai & Hove 1994, Wells 1952, Vannini 1950, Malaquin & de Lacaze‐Duthiers 1895, Cresp 1953) Spionida: (Michel 1898, Mesnil 1901, Herlant‐Meewis 1964, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Blake 1983, Tzetlin & Britayev 1985, Zajac 1995, Radashevsky 1996, Blake & Arnofsky 1999, Williams 2000, 2004, Bick 2001, Gibson & Paterson 2003, Bely 2006, Lindsay et al. 2007, Lindsay 2010, David & Williams 2011, Dualan & Williams 2011) Opheliidae: (Hyman 1940) Capitellidae: (Eisig 1887, Sayles 1936, Bely 2006) Echiuridae+Bonelliidae: (Gislén 1940, Agius 1979, Brusca & Brusca 1990) Terebellidae: (Berrill & Mees 1936, Herlant‐Meewis 1964) Arenicolidae: (Wells 1966, de Vlas 1979, Bely 2006) Maldanidae: (Sayles 1936, Moment 1951, Wilson 1979, Clavier 1984, Lindsay 2010) Sedentaria - Clitellata Naididae: (Galloway 1899, Abel 1902, Harper 1904, Stephenson 1907, 1910a, b, 1930, Krecker 1910, Hyman 1916, 1938, Mayhew 1922, Consoli 1923, Stone 1932, 1933b, Van Cleave 1937, Chu & Pai 1944, O’Brien 1946, Sperber 1948, Stout 1958, Brinkhurst & Jamieson 1971, Bilello & Potswald 1974, Lasserre 1975, Harman & Loden 1978, Naidu & Naidu 1979, Casellato 1984, Timm 1984, Nemec & Brinkhurst 1987, Finogenova & Arkhipova 1994, Armendariz 1999, Bely 1999, Bely & Wray 2001, Collado & Schmelz 2001, Kathman & Wetzel 2003, Bely & Sikes 2010, Zattara & Bely 2011, 2015) Enchytraeidae: (Bell 1958, 1959, Christensen 1961, 1964, Herlant‐Meewis 1964, Lasserre 1975, Bouguenec & Giani 1989, Christensen et al. 1989, Myohara et al. 1999, Schmelz et al. 2000, 2013, Müller 2004, Niva et al. 2012, Boros 2012, Collado et al. 2012, Myohara 2012, Schlaghamerskỳ 2013) Crassiclitellata: (Morgan 1897, Michel 1898, Tirala 1912, Hunt 1919, Gates 1927, 1949, Kropp 1933, Liebmann 1942, Moment 1949, Herlant‐Meewis 1964, Gallissian 1971, Saussey 1974, Timm 1984, Alonso‐Bedate & Sequers 1985, Fragoso & Lozano 1992, Pal et al. 1992, Okrzesik et al. 2013) Lumbriculidae: (Bonnet 1745, Randolph 1891, Morgulis 1907, Hyman 1916, 1940, Timm 1984, Christensen 1994) Hirudina: (Hyman 1940, Lasserre 1975, Schroeder & Hermans 1975, Bely 2006) 3 References 1. Abel M 1902. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Regenerationsvorgänge bei den limicolen Oligochäten. Z. Wissenschlaftliche Zool. 73: 1–74. 2. Abeloos M 1950a. Regeneration posterieure chez Magalia perarmata marion et bobr ‐ annelide polychete hesionide. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 230: 477–478. 3. Abeloos M 1950b. Sur la regeneration anterieure de l’annelide Magalia perarmata marion et bobr. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 230: 1109–1110. 4. Abeloos M 1952. Regeneration of Annelida Pterosyllis formosa Clap. Comptes Rendus Séances Société Biol. Ses Fil. 146: 1750–1752. 5. Agius L 1979. Larval settlement in the echiuran worm Bonellia viridis: Settlement on both the adult proboscis and body trunk. Mar. Biol. 53: 125–129. 6. Aguado MT, Helm C, Weidhase M, & Bleidorn C 2014. Description of a new syllid species as a model for evolutionary research of reproduction and regeneration in annelids. Org. Divers. Evol.: 1–21. 7. Ahrens JB, Kudenov JD, Marshall CD, & Schulze A 2014. Regeneration of posterior segments and terminal structures in the bearded fireworm, Hermodice carunculata (Annelida: Amphinomidae). J. Morphol. 275: 1103–1112. 8. Åkesson B & Rice SA 1992. Two new Dorvillea species (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae) with obligate asexuaI reproduction. Zool. Scr. 21: 351–362. 9. Allen EJ 1923. Regeneration and Reproduction of the Syllid Procerastea. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 211: 131–177. 10. Alonso‐Bedate M & Sequers E 1985. Suggested regulatory mechanisms for caudal regeneration in Allolobophora Molleri (Annelida: Oligochaeta). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 81: 225–228. 11. Arias A, Barroso R, Anadón N, & Paiva PC 2013a. On the occurrence of the fireworm Eurythoe complanata complex (Annelida, Amphinomidae) in the Mediterranean Sea with an updated revision of the alien Mediterranean amphinomids. ZooKeys: 19–33. 12. Arias A, Giangrande A, Gambi MC, & Anadón N 2013b. Biology and new records of the invasive species branchiomma bairdi (annelida: Sabellidae) in the mediterranean sea. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 14: 162–171. 13. Armendariz LC 1999. Dinámica poblacional de Allonais lairdi (Oligochaeta, Naididae) en Los Talas, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ecol. Austral 9: 20–27. 14. Bailey‐Brock JH 1984. Ecology of the tube‐building polychaete Diopatra leuckarti Kinberg, 1865 (Onuphidae) in Hawaii: community structure, and sediment stabilizing properties*. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 191–199. 15. Bell AW 1958. The Anatomy of the Oligochaete Enchytraeus albidus, with a key to the species of the genus Enchytraeus. Am. Mus. Novit. 1902: 1–13. 4 16. Bell AW 1959. Enchytraeus Fragmentosus, a New Species of Naturally Fragmenting Oligochaete Worm. Science 129: 1278–1278. 17. Bely AE 1999. Decoupling of fission and regenerative capabilities in an asexual oligochaete. Hydrobiologia 406: 243–251. 18. Bely AE 2006. Distribution of segment regeneration ability in the Annelida. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46: 508–518. 19. Bely AE & Sikes JM 2010. Latent regeneration abilities persist following recent evolutionary loss in asexual annelids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107: 1464–1469. 20. Bely AE & Wray GA 2001. Evolution of regeneration and fission in annelids: insights from engrailed‐ and orthodenticle‐class gene expression. Dev. Camb. Engl. 128: 2781–2791. 21. Ben‐Eliafiu MN & Ten Hove HA 1989. Redescription of Rhodopsis pusilla Bush, a little known but widely distributed species of Serpullidae (Polychaeta). Zool. Scr. 18: 381–395. 22. Berke SK, Cruz V, & Osman RW 2009. Sublethal Predation and Regeneration in Two Onuphid Polychaetes: Patterns and Implications. Biol. Bull. 217: 242–252. 23. Berkeley E & Berkeley C 1954. Notes on the Life‐History of the Polychaete, Dodecaceria fewkesi (nom. n.). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11: 326–334. 24. Berrill NJ 1928. Regeneration in the polychæt Chætopterus variopedatus. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. New Ser. 15: 151–158. 25. Berrill NJ 1931. Regeneration in Sabella pavonina (Sav.) and other sabellid worms. J. Exp. Zool. 58: 495–523. 26. Berrill NJ 1952. Regeneration and budding in worms. Biol. Rev. 27: 401–438. 27. Berrill NJ 1961. Growth, Development, and Pattern. W. H. Freeman and Company. 28. Berrill NJ 1978. Induced segmental reorganization in sabellid worms. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 47: 85–96. 29. Berrill NJ & Mees
Recommended publications
  • Soil-Dwelling Polychaetes: Enigmatic As Ever? Some Hints on Their

    Soil-Dwelling Polychaetes: Enigmatic As Ever? Some Hints on Their

    Contributions to Zoology, 70 (3) 127-138 (2001) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Soil-dwelling polychaetes: enigmatic as ever? Some hints on their phylogenetic relationships as suggested by a maximum parsimony analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences ³ Emilia Rota Patrick Martin² & Christer Erséus ¹, 1 di Dipartimento Biologia Evolutivei. Universitd di Siena, via P. A. Mattioli 4. IT-53100 Siena, Italy, e-mail: 2 Institut des Sciences naturelles de des [email protected]; royal Belgique, Biologic Eaux donees, 29 rue Vautier, B-1000 e-mail: 3 Bruxelles, Belgium, [email protected]; Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Terrestrial Polychaeta, Parergodrilus heideri, Stygocapitella subterranea, Hrabeiella I8S rRNA periglandulata, gene, molecular phylogeny, rapid radiation Abstract Collectionof new specimens 130 DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing 130 Alignment To re-evaluate 130 the various hypotheses on the systematic position of Phylogenetic analyses 130 Parergodrilus heideri Reisinger, 1925 and Hrabeiella Results 132 periglandulata Pizl & Chalupský, 1984,the sole truly terrestrial Discussion 132 non-clitellateannelidsknown to date, their phylogenetic relation- ships Acknowledgements 136 were investigated using a data set of new 18S rDNA References 136 of sequences these and other five relevant annelid taxa, including an unknown of species Ctenodrilidae, as well as homologous sequences available for 18 already polychaetes, one aphano- neuran, 11 clitellates, two pogonophorans, one echiuran, one Introduction sipunculan, three molluscs and two arthropods. Two different alignments were constructed, according to analgorithmic method terrestrial forms constitute (Clustal Truly a tiny minority W) and on the basis of a secondary structure model non-clitellate annelids, (DCSE), A maximum parsimony analysis was performed with among only represented by arthropods asan unambiguous outgroup.
  • Polychaete Worms Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera

    Polychaete Worms Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera

    THE POLYCHAETE WORMS DEFINITIONS AND KEYS TO THE ORDERS, FAMILIES AND GENERA THE POLYCHAETE WORMS Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera By Kristian Fauchald NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY In Conjunction With THE ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Science Series 28 February 3, 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHARACTERS USED TO DEFINE HIGHER TAXA 2 CLASSIFICATION OF POLYCHAETES 7 ORDERS OF POLYCHAETES 9 KEY TO FAMILIES 9 ORDER ORBINIIDA 14 ORDER CTENODRILIDA 19 ORDER PSAMMODRILIDA 20 ORDER COSSURIDA 21 ORDER SPIONIDA 21 ORDER CAPITELLIDA 31 ORDER OPHELIIDA 41 ORDER PHYLLODOCIDA 45 ORDER AMPHINOMIDA 100 ORDER SPINTHERIDA 103 ORDER EUNICIDA 104 ORDER STERNASPIDA 114 ORDER OWENIIDA 114 ORDER FLABELLIGERIDA 115 ORDER FAUVELIOPSIDA 117 ORDER TEREBELLIDA 118 ORDER SABELLIDA 135 FIVE "ARCHIANNELIDAN" FAMILIES 152 GLOSSARY 156 LITERATURE CITED 161 INDEX 180 Preface THE STUDY of polychaetes used to be a leisurely I apologize to my fellow polychaete workers for occupation, practised calmly and slowly, and introducing a complex superstructure in a group which the presence of these worms hardly ever pene- so far has been remarkably innocent of such frills. A trated the consciousness of any but the small group great number of very sound partial schemes have been of invertebrate zoologists and phylogenetlcists inter- suggested from time to time. These have been only ested in annulated creatures. This is hardly the case partially considered. The discussion is complex enough any longer. without the inclusion of speculations as to how each Studies of marine benthos have demonstrated that author would have completed his or her scheme, pro- these animals may be wholly dominant both in num- vided that he or she had had the evidence and inclina- bers of species and in numbers of specimens.
  • A Survey of Fresh-Water Oligochaeta and Their Commensal Ciliates from the Richmond, Virginia Area Elsa Queen Falls

    A Survey of Fresh-Water Oligochaeta and Their Commensal Ciliates from the Richmond, Virginia Area Elsa Queen Falls

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research Spring 1972 A survey of fresh-water oligochaeta and their commensal ciliates from the Richmond, Virginia area Elsa Queen Falls Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Falls, Elsa Queen, "A survey of fresh-water oligochaeta and their commensal ciliates from the Richmond, Virginia area" (1972). Master's Theses. Paper 343. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SURVEY OF FRESH-WATER OLIGOCHAETA AND THEIR COMMENSAL CILIATES FROM THE RICHMOND, VIRGINIA AREJ\ BY ELSA QUEEN FALLS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF AR TS IN BIOLOGY JUNE 1972 LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA A SURVEY OF FRESH-WATER OLTGOCHAETA AND THEIR COMMENSAL CILIATES FROM THE RICHMOND, VIRGINIA AREA APPROVED: THESIS COMMITTEE ·~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ••••••••••••••••••• ii INTRODUCTION •••••••••••••••••••••• 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS ••••••••••••• 4 RESULTS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 7 DISCUSSION •••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 SUMMARY • •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 22 LITERATURE CITED •••••••••••••••••• 24 FIGURES ••••••••••••••••.•••••••••• 2~ ADDENDUM .. ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 31 VITA • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 7 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my apr)reciation to the following faculty members of the Department of Biology: Dr. Nolan E. Rice, under whose direction this study was completed; Drs. Warwick R. West <ind John W. Bishop, who served with Dr. Rice as members of my thesis committee; and Dr.
  • Polychaeta Lana Crumrine

    Polychaeta Lana Crumrine

    Polychaeta Lana Crumrine Well over 200 species of the class Polychaeta are found in waters off the shores of the Pacific Northwest. Larval descriptions are not available for the majority of these species, though descriptions are available of the larvae for at least some species from most families. This chapter provides a dichotomous key to the polychaete larvae to the family level for those families with known or suspected pelagic larva. Descriptions have be $in gleaned from the literature from sites worldwide, and the keys are based on the assumption that developmental patterns are similar in different geographical locations. This is a large assumption; there are cases in which development varies with geography (e.g., Levin, 1984). Identifying polychaetes at the trochophore stage can be difficult, and culturing larvae to advanced stages is advised by several experts in the field (Bhaud and Cazaux, 1987; Plate and Husemann, 1994). Reproduction, Development, and Morphology Within the polychaetes, the patterns of reproduction and larval development are quite variable. Sexes are separate in most species, though hermaphroditism is not uncommon. Some groups undergo a process called epitoky at sexual maturation; benthic adults develop swimming structures, internal organs degenerate, and mating occurs between adults swimming in the water column. Descriptions of reproductive pattern, gamete formation, and spawning can be found in Strathmann (1987). Larval polychaetes generally develop through three stages: the trochophore, metatrochophore, and nectochaete stages. Trochophores are ciliated larvae (see Fig. 1).A band of cilia, the prototroch, is used for locomotion and sometimes feeding. Trochophore larvae are generally broad anteriorly and taper posteriorly.
  • Dodecaceria Concharum Örsted, 1843

    Dodecaceria Concharum Örsted, 1843

    Dodecaceria concharum Örsted, 1843 AphiaID: 129967 . Animalia (Reino) > Annelida (Filo) > Polychaeta (Classe) > Sedentaria (Subclasse) > Canalipalpata (Infraclasse) > Terebellida (Ordem) > Cirratuliformia (Subordem) > Cirratulidae (Familia) Nygren, Arne Sinónimos Dodecaceria caulleryi Dehorne, 1933 Heterocirrus gravieri McIntosh, 1911 1 Nereis sextentaculata Delle Chiaje, 1828 Terebella ostreae Dalyell, 1853 Zeppelina mediopigmentata Gillandt, 1979 Referências additional source Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series. 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details] additional source Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). , available online at http://www.itis.gov [details] additional source Bellan, Gerard. (2001). Polychaeta, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels. 50: pp. 214-231. [details] additional source Brunel, P.; Bosse, L.; Lamarche, G. (1998). Catalogue of the marine invertebrates of the estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 126. 405 p. [details] additional source Pollock, L.W. (1998). A practical guide to the marine animals of northeastern North America. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswick, New Jersey & London. 367 pp., available online at http://books.google.com/books?id=i1AmT31cuR4C [details] additional source Muller, Y. (2004). Faune et flore du littoral du Nord, du Pas-de-Calais et de la Belgique: inventaire. [Coastal fauna and flora of the Nord, Pas-de-Calais and Belgium: inventory]. Commission Régionale de Biologie Région Nord Pas-de-Calais: France.
  • Redalyc.First New Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) Species

    Redalyc.First New Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) Species

    Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía ISSN: 0717-3326 [email protected] Universidad de Valparaíso Chile Elias, Rodolfo; Rivero, María S. First new Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) species from the SW Atlantic (38ºS - 57ºW, Argentina) Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía, vol. 44, núm. 1, abril, 2009, pp. 131-136 Universidad de Valparaíso Viña del Mar, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47911450012 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 44(1): 131-136, abril de 2009 First new Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) species from the SW Atlantic (38ºS - 57ºW, Argentina) Primera especie nueva de Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) para el Atlántico SO (38ºS - 57ºW, Argentina) Rodolfo Elias1 and María S. Rivero1 1Laboratorio de Bioindicadores Bentónicos. Departamento de Ciencias Marinas,Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Deán Funes 3350. B 7602 – AYL. Mar del Plata, Argentina [email protected] Resumen.- Los cirratúlidos son un grupo difícil debido a Abstract.- Cirratulids are a difficult group because they have que tienen pocos caracteres taxonómicos y estos están a few taxonomic characters and these are often misinterpreted. frecuentemente mal interpretados. El género Dodecaceria ha The genus Dodecaceria, in particular has been reviewed in sido revisado en muchas partes del mundo, pero no en las costas several parts of the world but not in the southwestern Atlantic del Atlántico sudoccidental. Los estudios bentónicos de áreas shore.
  • Fauna Europaea: Annelida - Terrestrial Oligochaeta (Enchytraeidae and Megadrili), Aphanoneura and Polychaeta

    Fauna Europaea: Annelida - Terrestrial Oligochaeta (Enchytraeidae and Megadrili), Aphanoneura and Polychaeta

    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5737 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e5737 Data Paper Fauna Europaea: Annelida - Terrestrial Oligochaeta (Enchytraeidae and Megadrili), Aphanoneura and Polychaeta Emilia Rota‡, Yde de Jong §,| ‡ University of Siena, Siena, Italy § University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands | Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany Corresponding author: Emilia Rota ([email protected]), Yde de Jong ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 26 Jul 2015 | Accepted: 07 Sep 2015 | Published: 11 Sep 2015 Citation: Rota E, de Jong Y (2015) Fauna Europaea: Annelida - Terrestrial Oligochaeta (Enchytraeidae and Megadrili), Aphanoneura and Polychaeta. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5737. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e5737 Abstract Fauna Europaea provides a public web-service with an index of scientific names (including important synonyms) of all living European land and freshwater animals, their geographical distribution at country level (up to the Urals, excluding the Caucasus region), and some additional information. The Fauna Europaea project covers about 230,000 taxonomic names, including 130,000 accepted species and 14,000 accepted subspecies, which is much more than the originally projected number of 100,000 species. This represents a huge effort by more than 400 contributing specialists throughout Europe and is a unique (standard) reference suitable for many users in science, government, industry, nature conservation and education. This paper provides updated information on the taxonomic composition and distribution of the Annelida - terrestrial Oligochaeta (Megadrili and Enchytraeidae), Aphanoneura and Polychaeta, recorded in Europe. Data on 18 families, 11 autochthonous and 7 allochthonous, represented in our continent by a total of 800 species, are reviewed, beginning from their distinctness, phylogenetic status, diversity and global distribution, and following with major recent developments in taxonomic and faunistic research in Europe.
  • Zootaxa 1668:245–264 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)

    Zootaxa 1668:245–264 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)

    Zootaxa 1668:245–264 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Annelida* GREG W. ROUSE1 & FREDRIK PLEIJEL2 1Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla CA, 92093-0202, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Marine Ecology, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Göteborg University, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .245 Introduction . .245 Major polychaete taxa . .250 Monophyly of Annelida . .255 Molecular sequence data . 258 Rooting the annelid tree . .259 References . 261 Abstract The first annelids were formally described by Linnaeus (1758) and we here briefly review the history and composition of the group. The traditionally recognized classes were Polychaeta, Oligochaeta and Hirudinea. The latter two are now viewed as the taxon Clitellata, since recognizing Hirudinea with class rank renders Oligochaeta paraphyletic. Polychaeta appears to contain Clitellata, and so may be synonymous with Annelida. Current consensus would place previously rec- ognized phyla such as Echiura, Pogonophora, Sipuncula and Vestimentifera as annelids, though relationships among these and the various other annelid lineages are still unresolved. Key words: Polychaeta, Oligochaeta, Clitellata, Echiura, Pogonophora, Vestimentifera, Sipuncula, phylogeny, review Introduction Annelida is a group commonly referred to as segmented worms, found worldwide in terrestrial, freshwater and marine habitats. The first annelids were formally named by Linnaeus, including well-known forms such as the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758, the medicinal leech Hirudo medicinalis Linnaeus, 1758, and the sea-mouse Aphrodite aculeata Linnaeus, 1758.
  • Phylogenetics of Acrocirridae and Flabelligeridae (Cirratuliformia, Annelida)

    Phylogenetics of Acrocirridae and Flabelligeridae (Cirratuliformia, Annelida)

    Zoologica Scripta Phylogenetics of Acrocirridae and Flabelligeridae (Cirratuliformia, Annelida) KAREN J. OSBORN &GREG W. ROUSE Submitted: 26 July 2010 Osborn, K. J. & Rouse, G. W. (2010). Phylogenetics of Acrocirridae and Flabelligeridae Accepted: 5 October 2010 (Cirratuliformia, Annelida). — Zoologica Scripta, 40, 204–219. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00460.x When seven deep-sea, swimming cirratuliforms were recently discovered, the need for a thorough phylogenetic hypothesis for Cirratuliformia was clear. Here, we provide a robust phylogenetic hypothesis for the relationships within Acrocirridae and increase the taxon sampling and resolution within Flabelligeridae based on both molecular (18S, 28S, 16S, COI and CytB) and morphological data. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination. Acrocirridae and Flabelligeridae were reciprocally monophyletic sister groups when rooted by cirratulids. The seven recently discovered species form a clade within Acrocirridae and will be designated as four genera based on phylogenetic relationships and apomorphies. A revised diagnosis is provided for Swima, restricting the genus to three spe- cies distinguished by a thick gelatinous sheath, transparent body, simple nuchal organs, a single medial subulate branchia, and four pair of small segmental branchiae modified as elliptical, bioluminescent sacs. Helmetophorus and Chauvinelia are maintained as separate genera based on morphological differences. Evidence for flabelligerid branchiae being seg- mental is provided, the papillae on segment two of most acrocirrids is confirmed to be the nephridiopores, and scanning electron microscopy is used to examine acrocirrid spinous chaetae in comparison with flabelligerid segmented chaetae. Corresponding author: Karen J. Osborn, Institute of Marine Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, Earth & Marine Sciences Building, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
  • Checklist of Questidae (Clitellata) and Aeolosomatidae (Oligochaeta) from South America

    Checklist of Questidae (Clitellata) and Aeolosomatidae (Oligochaeta) from South America

    M. L. CHRISTOFFERSEN Turk J Zool 2012; 36(1): 133-138 © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1002-26 Checklist of Questidae (Clitellata) and Aeolosomatidae (Oligochaeta) from South America Martin Lindsey CHRISTOFFERSEN* Federal University of Paraiba, Department of Systematics and Ecology, 58.059-900, João Pessoa, Paraíba - BRAZIL Received: 09.02.2010 Abstract: Th e faunistic assemblage of basal clitellates in South America presently has 2 marine species (Questa media Westheide, 1981 and Aeolosoma maritimum dubiosum Westheide & Schmidt, 1974), and 15 species of freshwater aeolosomatids: A. aureum Marcus, 1944; A. beddardi Michaelsen, 1900; A. corderoi Du Bois-Reymond Marcus, 1944; A. evelinae Marcus, 1944; A. fl avum Štolc, 1903; A. gertae Marcus, 1944; A. headleyi Beddard, 1888; A. hemprichi Ehrenberg, 1831; A. hyalinum Bunke, 1967; A. marcusi Van der Land, 1971; A. sawayai Marcus, 1944; A. travancorense Aiyer, 1926; A. variegatum Vejdovský, 1884; and A. viride Stephenson, 1911, and Hystricosoma pictum Schmarda, 1861, species inquirenda. Eight of these are known only from South America. Key words: Distribution, lineage of continental annelids, faunistics, checklist, marine and freshwater “polychaetes” Introduction Materials and methods A series of catalogues on South American (*, species known only from South America) euclitellates have been published recently by me (Christoff ersen, 2007a-c, 2008a-f, 2009a-b). I herein include the basal lineages of Clitellata occurring in Results South America. Th eir phylogenetic positions among QUESTIDAE Hartman, 1966 the Clitellata have been treated in another paper Questa Hartman, 1966 (Christoff ersen, 2012). Type species: Questa caudicirra Hartmann, 1966. A catalogue of non-marine Polychaeta of the Synonym: Novaquesta Hobson, 1970 (type: world, including the Aeolosomatidae, was provided Novaquesta trifurcata Hobson, 1970).
  • Taxonomy of the Bitentaculate Cirratulidae (Polychaeta) Stacy A

    Taxonomy of the Bitentaculate Cirratulidae (Polychaeta) Stacy A

    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 8-31-2015 Taxonomy of the Bitentaculate Cirratulidae (Polychaeta) Stacy A. Tewari University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Tewari, Stacy A., "Taxonomy of the Bitentaculate Cirratulidae (Polychaeta)" (2015). Graduate Masters Theses. 345. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses/345 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAXONOMY OF THE BITENTACULATE CIRRATULIDAE (POLYCHAETA) A Thesis Presented by STACY A. TEWARI Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2015 Environmental Biology Graduate Program © 2015 by Stacy A. Tewari All rights reserved TAXONOMY OF THE BITENTACULATE CIRRATULIDAE (POLYCHAETA) A Thesis Presented by STACY A. TEWARI Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________________________ Michael Rex, Professor Chairperson of Committee ________________________________________________ Richard Kesseli,
  • New Records of Polychaetes from the South Part of Suez Canal, Egypt

    New Records of Polychaetes from the South Part of Suez Canal, Egypt

    World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences 1 (1): 07-19, 2009 ISSN 1992-0083 © IDOSI Publications, 2009 New Records of Polychaetes from the South Part of Suez Canal, Egypt Faiza A. Abd-Elnaby National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria, Egypt Abstract: Faunistic analysis of benthic samples were obtained during a trip to the south part of Suez Canal, Egypt, during April, 2007, which revealed the presence of 82 polychaete species, 18 of them are considered as new records for the Egyptian waters. In order to achieve this study fouling components and sediments samples were collected by Van Veen grab (0.5 to 8 m depths), from six stations extending from Deversoir to Port Toufiq. Illustrative taxonomical characters is provided for each newly recorded species; as well as geographic distribution are given to draw a picture of the new records, which indicated that most of them are lessepsian migrant and 6 species are of Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea affinity. Also the polychaete recorded formed less dense of population on shallow water, hard substrates and also in sediment. Key words: Polychaete % New records % Taxonomy % South part of Suez Canal INTRODUCTION investigations are required. Therefore this study may be help in this phenomena. The Suez Canal appears as consisting of a simple In this respect [6-8] investigated the polychaetes longitudinal narrow channel extending between Lat. along the Suez Canal. Later, an extensive work on the 29°56´ 14" N, Long, 32°33´ 47´´ E. at Suez in the south on fouling assemblage along Suez Canal and Lake Timsah the Gulf of Suez and Lat.