DOCSLIB.ORG

LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Page 1 Reference Description Dates Conservancy Books CLA/036/01/0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Page 1 Reference Description Dates Conservancy Books CLA/036/01/0 LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Reference Description Dates Conservancy books CLA/036/01/001 Conservancy Book [A] Mar 1667 - 1666 - 1684 Dates (on vol) Sep 1683 CLA/036/01/002 Conservancy Book [B and II] Apr 1684 - Sep 1684 - 1961 Dates (on vol) 1691 CLA/036/01/003 Conservancy Book [C and III] Apr 1692 - Sep 1692 - 1702 Dates (on vol) 1702 CLA/036/01/004 Conservancy Book [D and IV] Mar 1697/8 - 1698 - 1728 Dates (on vol) Oct 1728 (with gaps) CLA/036/01/005 Conservancy Book [E and V] Mar 1702/3 - 1702 - 1714 Dates (on vol) May 1714 CLA/036/01/006 Conservancy Book [F and VI] Jul 1714 - Oct 1714 - 1728 Dates (on vol) 1728 CLA/036/01/007 Conservancy Book [G] Mar 1728/9 - 1728 - 1771 Dates (on vol) Oct 1770 CLA/036/01/008 Conservancy Book [H] Jun 1771 - 1771 - 1821 Dates (on vol) Sep 1821 CLA/036/01/009 Conservancy Book [I and IX] Jun 1822 - Jul 1822 - 1841 Dates (on vol) 1842 CLA/036/01/010 Conservancy Book [K and X] Feb 1843 - Jul 1843 Dates (on vol) 1857 CLA/036/01/011 Rough Conservancy book [L1] Feb 1843 - Sep 1843 CLA/036/01/012 Rough Conservancy book [L2] Feb 1843 - Jul 1847 CLA/036/01/013 Rough Conservancy book [L3] Jun 1848 - Jul 1857 Conservancy papers Kent 5 June 1646 LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Reference Description Dates CLA/036/02/1646/01/001 Grand jury presentments. May 1646 5 pages Former reference: T9.2 CLA/036/02/1646/01/002 Waterbailiff Edward Pearce's presentments 4 Jun 1646 2 pages Former reference: T9.2 1655 1661 1667 CLA/036/02/1667/01/001 View of docks, wharves, and other common 6 May 1667 landing places between the Tower of London and Puddle Dock, taken 6 May 1667 by Alderman Sir William Hooker and others [named], with measurements noted. 4 pages Former reference: 181/4/17 1669: Miscellaneous CLA/036/02/1669/01/001 List of persons fined at Courts 5,6, and 8. 1669 1 page Former reference: Misc.Ms 153.1 CLA/036/02/1669/01/002 List of persons fined, for Courts 9-12 1669 2 pages Former reference: Misc.Ms 153.1 CLA/036/02/1669/01/003 List of persons fined, for Courts 13-16 1669 2 pages Former reference: Misc.Ms 153.1 Court 14: Middlesex (Westminster) 14 Sep 1670 CLA/036/02/1670/01/001 Recognizance of John Shaw and Henry 24 Aug [1670] Dawson, watermen, to appear at [this Court] to give evidence against Edward Gilman the elder, George Greene, George Smith, Richard Gilman, John Streete and John Weamouth, watermen, for destroying the fry of fish 1 membrane Former reference: 'Box 3' Miscellaneous 1670 LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 3 THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Reference Description Dates CLA/036/02/1670/02/001 List of persons fined at all courts 1670 2 pages Former reference: Misc.Ms 34.11 Court 1: Surrey (Southwark) 5 April 1671 CLA/036/02/1671/01/001/A Grand jury precept (a) panel (b) and copy panel 1671 Unfit (c). Not available for general access 2 membranes and 1p Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/01/001/B Grand jury precept (a) panel (b) and copy panel 1671 Unfit (c). Not available for general access 2 membranes and 1p Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/01/001/C Grand jury precept (a) panel (b) and copy panel 1671 Unfit (c). Not available for general access 2 membranes and 1p Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/01/002 Writ of capias. 1671 Unfit 1 membrane Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/01/003 Petty jury precept for the trial of John Fisher. 1671 Unfit 1 membrane Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/01/004/A Petty jury precept (a) and panel (b) for the trial 1671 Unfit of Edward Smith, gentleman. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/01/004/B Petty jury precept (a) and panel (b) for the trial 1671 Unfit of Edward Smith, gentleman. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' Court 2: Middlesex (Westminster) 5 April 1671 CLA/036/02/1671/02/001/A Grand jury precept (a) and panel (b). 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access CLA/036/02/1671/02/001/B Grand jury precept (a) and panel (b). 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 4 THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Reference Description Dates CLA/036/02/1671/02/002 Writ of capias 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access Court 3: Essex (Stratford Langthorne) 7 April 1671 CLA/036/02/1671/03/001 Grand jury precept. 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access CLA/036/02/1671/03/002 Writ of capias. 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access Court 4: Kent (Greenwich) 7 April 1671 CLA/036/02/1671/04/001/A Writ of capias (a), grand jury precept (b), panel 1671 Unfit (c), and copy panel (d). Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/04/001/B Writ of capias (a), grand jury precept (b), panel 1671 Unfit (c), and copy panel (d). Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/04/001/C Writ of capias (a), grand jury precept (b), panel 1671 Unfit (c), and copy panel (d). Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/04/001/D Writ of capias (a), grand jury precept (b), panel 1671 Unfit (c), and copy panel (d). Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' Court 5: Middlesex (Fulham) 17 May 1671 CLA/036/02/1671/05/001 Writ of capias. 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access CLA/036/02/1671/05/002 Writ of venire. 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access CLA/036/02/1671/05/003 Petty jury precept for the trial of Richard Finch 1671 Unfit of St. Botolph Without Aldgate, [London]. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 5 THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Reference Description Dates CLA/036/02/1671/05/004 Petty jury precept for trial of John Cozens of St. 1671 Unfit Botolph Without Aldgate, [London]. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' Court 6: Surrey (Putney) 17 May 1671 CLA/036/02/1671/06/001 Writ of capias. 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access CLA/036/02/1671/06/002 Writ of venire. 1671 Unfit Former reference: 'Box 3' Not available for general access CLA/036/02/1671/06/003/A Petty jury precept (a) and panel (b) for the trial 1671 Unfit of William Miller of Lambeth. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/06/003/B Petty jury precept (a) and panel (b) for the trial 1671 Unfit of William Miller of Lambeth. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/06/004/A Petty jury precept (a) and panel (b) for the trial 1671 Unfit of John Finch of Lambeth. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' CLA/036/02/1671/06/004/B Petty jury precept (a) and panel (b) for the trial 1671 Unfit of John Finch of Lambeth. Not available for general access Former reference: 'Box 3' Court 13: Surrey (Southwark) 15 Sep 1680 CLA/036/02/1680/10/001 Grand jury presentments. 1680 Contemporary endorsement '10' 5 pages Former reference: T9.1 LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 6 THAMES CONSERVANCY COURTS CLA/036 Reference Description Dates CLA/036/02/1680/10/002 Indictment of Thomas Luffe of the parish of St. 1680 Saviour, Southwark, timber merchant, for allowing 'firretimber' to impede the navigation. [N.B. This indictment has been placed here on the evidence of the Thames Conservancy Book for 8 June 1681, which refers to his, and other trials, all annotated as being presented at 'Cl [ayton] '10...'[i.e. 1680, presentments endorsed '10'... see: CAL/036/02/1680/10/1]. Although there is no presentment 11 (Luffe's trial reference) extant in these presentments, there may be a page missing from them, so, since the other people's references from Luffe's trial date do fit these presentments, this indictment has been placed here by analogy with them.] 1 membrane Former reference: 185/4/14 Court 15: Kent (Greenwich) 17 Sep 1680 CLA/036/02/1680/11/001 Grand jury presentments. At risk Contemporary endorsement '12'.??This document is enclosed in a Secol transparent sleeve for extra protection and should not be removed from the sleeve when being consulted 1 page Former reference: T9.1 CLA/036/02/1680/11/002 Bargemaster John Aylworth's bill, receipt 28 Sep 1680. 1 page Former reference: Misc.Ms 152.16 Court 16: Essex (Stratford Langthorne) 18 Sep 1680 CLA/036/02/1680/12/001 Grand jury presentments. Unfit 2 pages Not available for general access Former reference: T9.1 Miscellaneous 1680 CLA/036/02/1680/13/001 Waterbailiff Benjamin Harvey's bill for the 29 Sep 1679 - eastward search of the Thames 29 - Sep 1680 2 fols Former reference: 169/7 (14) CLA/036/02/1680/13/002 Waterbailiff Benjamin Harvey's bill for all Courts 1680 for 1680, receipted 27 Sep 1680.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ
    This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Conservancy Act, 1950
    Thames Conservancy Act, 1950 14 GEO. 6 Cli. 1 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short and collective titles. 2. Division of Act into Parts. 3. Amending definition of Thames in Act of 1932. 4. Interpretation. 5. Repeal of enactments. PART II CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS OF CONSERVATORS 6. Constitution of Conservators. 7. Increase in number of Conservators. 8. Term of office of Conservators. 9. Conservator interested in a contract. 10. As to contracts. PART III FURTHER POWERS IN RELATION TO CONSERVANCY NAVIGATION ETC. 11. Amendment of sections 69 70 and 71 of Act of 1932. 12. Power to enter and inspect vessels. 13. Name of launch to be conspicuously displayed. 14. Amendment of section 92 of Act of 1932. 15. Owner of pleasure boat to afford information as to person in charge. 16. Removal of sunk stranded or abandoned vessels. PART IV LANDS 17. Purchase of lands. PART V PREVENTION OF POLLUTION 18. Special interpretation relating to pollution. 19. Map of Thames catchment area. A Ch. I Thames Conservancy 14 GEO. 6 Act, 1950 Section 20. Amendment of section 124 of Act of 21. Sanitary authorities owners and occupiers to afford information. 22. Provision in case of neglect of sanitary authority to perform certain duties. 23. Inspection of sanitary arrangements of vessels. 24. Removal of dead animals. PART VI CHARGES ON VESSELS MERCHANDISE ETC. (a) Tolls on merchandise traffic 25. Tolls on merchandise traffic. (b) Tolls for piers 26. Tolls leviable at piers and landing places. (c) Lock tolls and charges on pleasure boats 27. Lock tolls on pleasure boats.
    [Show full text]
  • An Innovative Organizational Arrangement for Comprehensive Water Services; the Thames Water Authority As a Model for Complex '
    .3 An Innovative Organizational Arrangement for Comprehensive Water Services; The Thames Water Authority as a Model for Complex ',. Urban Areas of the Great Lakes JONATHAN W. BULKLEY THOMAS A. GROSS September 1975 Research Project Technical Completion Report OWRT Project No. A-083-MICH Grant No. 14-31-0001-5022 Program in Resource Policy and Management School of Natural Resources ~\\lV 0, ~~~ Department of Civil Engineering z ; : College of Engineering ::::a - -... ~~ ~O) './ 1811 ~ . I I \, ..J .-_. __. ... .:..,.~- ..L. J ...;J...; " ..L..J.. c.t',"" '...., _n~,l_.>...J TNTPRTOR__•• - _.J. - D AN INNOVATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR COMPREHENSIVE WATER SERVICES r. The ~Thames Water Authority as a Model for Complex Urban Areas of the Great Lakes by ,/ Jonathan W. Bulkley Principal Investigator and C Thomas A. Gross Research Project Technical Completion Report OWRT Project No. A-083-MICH Grant No. 14-31-0001-5022 Research Investigation Period: January - September 1975 Submi tted to the Office of Water Research and Technology U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D. C. Program in Resource Policy and Management School of Natural Resources Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan September 1975 ABSTRACT A need exists for regional consideration and eval­ uation of comprehensive water services in complex urban areas. The Thames Water Authority (TWA) in England pro­ vides such comprehensive water services to the entire Thames River Basin including metropolitan London; an area of 5000 square miles with a population of 12 million. In recognition of the possible application of such a con­ cept to complex urban areas of the Great Lakes, the prin­ cipal investigator spent six months as a participant-observer with the Authority and provides a detailed description of its organization and operation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hydrography & Cartography of a Great
    THE HYDROGRAPHY & CARTOGRAPHY OF A GREAT SEAPORT by C o m m a n d e r E. C. SHANKLAHD, R. H. R., F. R . S. E., R i v e r S uperintendent a n d H ydrographic S u r v e y o r , P o r t o f L o n d o n A u t h o r i t y . The Port of London Authority exercises jurisdiction over that part of the Thames which flows from Teddington Lock (approximately) to a line joining Havengore Creek in Essex and Warden Point in Sheppey, Kent. To depict the changes in the hydrography of the channels, creeks, whar­ ves, bridges and dock entrances the survey of the river requires continuous attention. CARTOGRAPHY. Within the dock system a regular watch is kept to maintain depth, as a considerable amount of silt in suspension finds its way inside the tidal gates. The triangulation and surveyor’s working sheets are connected with those of the Ordnance Survey and are divided up into convenient lengths of river, more or less identified with the Reaches so well known to mariners. The survey sheets and the scales on which they are projected are enumerated in the following table. LIST OF SURVEYS — RIVER THAMES TIDEWAY Chxvt Section of River. Date of Scale Survey i. 1929 1/1056 2. Cross Deep to Petersham Drawdock.................................................... 1929 )) 3- Petersham Drawdock to Richmond Lock and Weir........................ 1929 )) )) 4 - Richmond Lock and Weir to Church Ferry, Isleworth.................. 1928 *>• 1928 )) 6. 1927 )) )) 7- 1926-7 8. Barnes R ailw ay Bridge to Chiswick Ferry.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock
    NRA Thames 254 National Rivers Authority Thames Region TR44 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 NRA Thames Region Document for INTERNAL CIRCULATION only National River Authority Thames Region Catchment Planning - West River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT Overview 2 Geology and Topography 2 Hydrology 2 Water Resources 5 Water Quality 9 Pollution Control 14 Consented Discharges 15 * Flood Defence 18 Fisheries 18 Conservation 19 Landscape 21 Recreation 23 Navigation 26 Land Use Planning Context 29 Minerals 31 P2J73/ i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review Page 3. CATCHMENT ISSUES 34 South West Oxfordshire Reservoir Proposal 34 Ground water Pollution 35 River Levels & Flows 35 Habitat Degradation 35 Wolvercote Pit 36 Eutrophication of the Thames 36 River Thames : Seacourt Stream Relationship 36 The River Thames Through Oxford 37 Oxford Structures Study 37 Oxford Sewage Treatment Works 37 Kidlington Sewage Treatment Works 38 Oxford Sewers 38 Development Pressure 38 Navigation Issues 39 Landscape Issues 39 Recreation Issues 39 Wiltshire Berkshire Canal 40 Summary of Key Issues 41 4. CATCHMENT ACTIONS 43 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 P2573/ i i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 Details of Licensed Ground/Surface Water Abstractions of Greater than lML/day 9 2.2 RQOs,
    [Show full text]
  • Docklands History Group Meeting Wednesday November 2007
    Docklands History Group meeting Wednesday November 2007 Conservancy and the Thames - the context and history of the Thames Conservators from November 1857 to April 1974 By Robert Baldwin Geology and economic geography have been the major determinants of the form and use of the Thames and its adjacent settlement. The Romans were not the first extensive users of the Thames for international trade but were the first to leave extensive archaeological records of its use and initiate limited written records about its defence. Roman Administration of the Thames after 43 AD and of its ports and bridges (most notably London’s from c.70 AD) was essentially military and lasted until 411AD Since 1920 the archaeology of city centre sites alongside the Thames has transformed understanding of its use in trade. The Roman era saw the start of important riverine facilities at Colchester, Rochester, Ebbsfleet, London, Brentford and Oxford, and of signal towers at Reculver and Greenwich, allowing the Roman fleets to enforce control and exclude piratical threats. It could be enlivened with finds of Roman ships and waterfront archaeology. After centuries of little effective control of the river and the relocation of the Saxon city of London to the west of the Roman city the emergence of corporate authority reached the point where effective resistance to Danish incursions was possible by 995. Crown concerns in river and port administration grew and legal precision from c.870 to 1449, with many written interventions from the Crown and its officials recorded. Other medieval sources include Domesday Book and the writings of Bede, Goderick, Chaucer and Froissart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thames Flood Series: a Lack of Trend in Flood Magnitude and a Decline in Maximum Levels
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NERC Open Research Archive Article (refereed) - postprint Marsh, Terry; Harvey, Catherine L. 2012 The Thames flood series: a lack of trend in flood magnitude and a decline in maximum levels. © IWA Publishing 2012 This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/18966/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access This document is the author’s final manuscript version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this and the publisher’s version remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from this article. The definitive peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Hydrology Research, (2012) 43 (3). 203-214. 10.2166/nh.2012.054 and is available at www.iwapublishing.com. Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. 1 Revision II 2 3 4 The Thames flood series – a lack of trend in flood magnitude 5 and a decline in maximum levels 6 7 8 Terry Marsh and Catherine L Harvey 9 10 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology 11 12 Corresponding author 13 14 Terry Marsh 15 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology 16 Maclean Building 17 Crowmarsh Gifford 18 Wallingford 19 Oxfordshire OX10 8BB 20 21 Email: [email protected] 22 Tel: +44 (0) 1491692286 23 Fax: +44 (0) 1491692424 24 25 26 Abstract 27 28 The flow series for the River Thames near its tidal limit is one of the most studied in the 29 world.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilenth Ctrntury Stancling Until the Abolition of the Old Lor-Rdon Bridge in R83r
    350 LONDON IN'fHE NINI'.'tIlENTH CtrNTURY stancling until the abolition of the old Lor-rdon Bridge in r83r. \\'.e rla)' nou' convenientll- glance at the historl' of each big compauy in turn. 'fhe r,vater-suppi,vwas at the encl of the nineteenth centLrr)'in tl-re hands oi eight private companies, rvhose 6zo square miles of area comprisecl the wl-rolc of the \'Ietropolis ancl parts of Nliddlesex, Herts, F)ssex, Kent, and Surrev, The oldest of these, the Net, River Companr', originatecl in I6r3, in the manner alreacly describecl. The first shareholders were incorpor:rted in t6r9, under thc \Ii\\' RI'IlR \\"\'I'Eli\\'ol{KS Stoke Ne\ ington Ile5er\oir. .lr,rn irrg outlel Itrottt a l)/tolo 1'1'-/. F, ,1lost1'tt Cltttl,t title of ,''fhe Governors ar-rdConrpanv of the New River brought from Chadwell ancl Amwell to Lor-rdon." The directorate u'as vested in twenty-nine persons,who held thirt,r,six aclventurers'shares-so called in contradistinction to those held by the Iiing and his assigns-which had originally belonged to Sir I{r'rgh \{1'ddleton, tvho at this tinte retained onl1' tlvo.l Jarnes L did not live to receive any profits hirnself,and the thirty-six King's shares u'ere afteru'arclsresigned by Charles L I \o p:rr.ticulararea of sLrpPlr-l:rs grantecl to tlrc Conrpanl', at.iclthcre lls tto lit-uitlrtion of capital in the Cl.rarter. A Selcct Colrntittee of tltc Hor:se of Cournrons in t E: I st:ttc(1 the ol iginal c.):it to hllve bcen houses suppliecl, l'hc total {369,6oo.
    [Show full text]
  • A. the River As Commercial Waterway B. the River As One of London's Playgrounds C. the River As Water Provide
    23/09/2020 Survey 1930 Putney to Staines - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE The Thames from Putney to Staines A Survey of the River, with Suggestions for the Preservation of its Amenities, prepared for A Joint Committee of the Middlesex and Surrey County Councils by Adams, Thompson and Fry, Town Planning Consultants 121 Victoria Street, Westminter, SW1 St Dominic’s Press Ditchling, Hassocks, Sussex 1930 Syon Reach CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: A. THE RIVER AS COMMERCIAL WATERWAY B. THE RIVER AS ONE OF LONDON’S PLAYGROUNDS C. THE RIVER AS WATER PROVIDER D. THE RIVER AND LAND DRAINAGE E. THE RIVER BANKS AND BUILDINGS F. HOW AMENITIES MAY BE DESTROYED: a. Industrial Buildings and Public Works b. Bridges c. Domestic Buildings d. Advertisements e. Various causes of disfigurement and loss of amenity f. General attitude to the river https://thames.me.uk/Survey1930.htm 1/47 23/09/2020 Survey 1930 Putney to Staines - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE II. A SURVEY OF THE RIVER WITH SUGGESTIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ITS AMENITIES A. PUTNEY BRIDGE-HAMMERSMITH BRIDGE B. HAMMERSMITH BRIDGE-BARNES BRIDGE C. BARNES BRIDGE-KEW BRIDGE D. KEW BRIDGE-RICHMOND RAILWAY BRIDGE E. RICHMOND RAILWAY BRIDGE-BUCCLEUCH HOUSE F. BUCCLEUCH HOUSE-TEDDINGTON WEIR G. TEDDINGTON WEIR-KINGSTON BRIDGE H. KINGSTON BRIDGE-HAMPTON COURT BRIDGE I. [NB there is no I. section] J. HAMPTON COURT BRIDGE-SUNBURY WEIR K. SUNBURY WEIR-SHEPPERTON LOCK AND WEIRS L. SHEPPERTON LOCK-PENTON HOOK LOCK M. PENTON HOOK-STAINES BRIDGE III. METHODS OF PRESERVING THE AMENITIES OF THE RIVER SIDE A. OPEN SPACES a.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebb and Flow a Self Guided Walk Along the River Thames from Molesey to Kingston
    Ebb and flow A self guided walk along the River Thames from Molesey to Kingston Explore life and leisure along the non-tidal Thames Discover how its meanders and islands were formed Find out how the water is managed and maintained See how the river is used for work, leisure and sport .discoveringbritain www .org ies of our land the stor scapes throug discovered h walks 2 Contents Introduction 4 Route overview 5 Practical information 6 Detailed route maps 8 Commentary 10 Further information 37 Credits 38 © The Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers, London, 2014 Discovering Britain is a project of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) The digital and print maps used for Discovering Britain are licensed to the RGS-IBG from Ordnance Survey Cover image: Rowing boats and steamer by Hampton Court Bridge © Rory Walsh 3 Ebb and flow Explore the River Thames between Molesey and Kingston Rivers are a vital resource for human life on Earth. Most of the world’s biggest cities are located by large rivers. These waterways are so important that they are respected, venerated, even worshipped. While the River Ganges in India is deified as Mother Ganges, a life- giving nurturing goddess, in London the river is personified as Old Father Thames. This walk between Molesey and Kingston explores a short section of the non-tidal river to find out about its physical characteristics – its flow and floods, its islands and meanders. The walk also tells the story of the river’s many roles - as a place to live, a place to work and a place to play.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Reform of London: the Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/ft3x0nb131 No online items Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Processed by Special Collections staff. Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. DA676 .S26 1785 1 Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Department of Special Collections and University Archives Rare Book Division Stanford University Libraries Stanford, California Contact Information Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ Processed by: Special Collections staff Encoded by: Steven Mandeville-Gamble © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sanitary Reform of London: the working collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Date (inclusive): ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Creator: Bazalgette, Joseph Extent: 455 items Repository: Stanford University. Libraries. Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Abstract: The collection documents the history of the sanitary evolution of London from the 1840s to the early twentieth century. Some 4500 separate printed, typescript, and manuscript items trace the stages by which the drainage and fresh water supply for London was introduced-- in its time perhaps the greatest feat of urban civil engineering that had ever been undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • River Thames- Hampton Court to Richmond Moderate Trail: Please Be Aware That the Grading of This Trail Was Set According to Normal Water Levels and Conditions
    River Thames- Hampton Court to Richmond Moderate Trail: Please be aware that the grading of this trail was set according to normal water levels and conditions. Weather and water level/conditions can change the nature of trail within a short space of time so please ensure you check both of these before heading out. Route Summary Distance: 7 miles This section of the River Thames has much of interest en- Approximate Time: 2-3 Hours route with activity on the water, the mixed landscapes of The time has been estimated based on you travelling 3 – 5mph parkland and town, and historic landmarks. The trail is (a leisurely pace using a recreational type of boat). suitable for all abilities by either canoe or kayak in normal Type of Trail: One Way river conditions. Waterways Travelled: River Thames For ease of parking and launching the trail commences at Type of Water: River urban West Molesey, approximately ¾ mile upstream of Hampton Court Bridge. Portages and Locks: 2 locks Nearest Town: Richmond The reaches between Molesey and Richmond are some of Start: - Hurst Park, West Molesey, London, KT8 1ST MR the busiest on the river with canoes, rowers, sailing 176/134691 dinghies, motor cruisers, hire boats and passenger launch services, especially at weekends. Do keep an eye on Finish: River Lane, Petersham, Richmond Mr 176 other river traffic and comply with navigation rules 178735, TW10 7AG Start Directions O.S. Sheets: Landranger No. 176 – West London Licence Information: A licence is required to paddle this waterway. See full details in Useful Information Hurst Park, West Molesey, London, KT8 1ST MR below.
    [Show full text]