The Water Quality of the Tidal Thames Environment Agency Information Centre the Water Quality Head Office of the Tidal Thames Class No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Water Quality of the Tidal Thames Environment Agency Information Centre the Water Quality Head Office of the Tidal Thames Class No The Water Quality of the Tidal Thames Environment Agency Information Centre The Water Quality Head office of the Tidal Thames Class no .A-Report-of-the-Environment'Agency February 1997 National Information Centre The Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West BRISTOL BS12 4UD Due for return LONDON : THE STATIONERY OFFICE Commissioning Organisation: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Almondsbury Bristol BS12 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 © Environment Agency First Published 1997 ISBN 0 11 310125 2 Applications for reproduction should be made to: The Stationery Office Ltd., St. Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich NR3 1PD All rights reserved. N o part o f this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those o f the Environment Agency. Its officers, servants or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance upon views contained herein. Cover photograph: Chorley and Handford Ltd., The Thames Estuary at Tower Bridge Printed on recycled paper Reprise Matt 115gsm 80% recycled content (40% pre consumer waste 40% post consumer waste) Preface----- --------- One of the Environment Agency's more important duties is to compile information in order to form an opinion of the general state of pollution of the environment. There are many ways in which such an opinion could usefully be formed, but one of the most constructive is that of looking at specific areas of the environment in an integrated way. By their very nature, estuaries are complex bodies of water, and this complexity-is greatly increased by the many activities which take place within them. It was for this reason that the National Rivers Authority embarked on a series of in-depth studies on the major estuaries of England and Wales, reporting on the Humber_in_1.993-and-on-the-Mersey~m 19957This'senerKaTbeen continued by the Environment Agency, with a first report on that most important o f estuaries, the Thames. It is a good story, but one which has yet to be completed. Quite dramatic improvements have been made in the past, but pressures on the estuary remain and these need careful management. The Environment Agency is thus working closely with others to draw up plans upon which future decisions can be sensibly made, and to ensure that plans for the river upstream of the tidal limit are linked to plans for the downstream, estuarine areas. This report provides the historic and factual evaluation upon which such plans will be based. R J Pentreath Chief Scientist and Director of Environmental Strategy Water Quality of the Tidal Thames Contents Executive Summary 8 1. An Introduction to the Thames Estuary 11 1.1 G eography 11 1.2 Hydrography 1 1 1.3 Freshw ater Inputs 13 1.4 Groundwater Inputs and Geology 13 1.5 London 15 1.6Land Use 17 1.7 Recreation and Transport 18 1.8 Conservation Status 19 The Legislative and Regulatory Framework 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2 .2 Metropolitan Board ofWorks 20 2.3 Thames Conservancy 20 2 .4 Port of LondonAuthority (PLA) 20 2.5 Pollution Prevention Acts, 1951 and 1961 20 2 .6 Pippard Report, 1961 20 2.7 Port of London Act, 1964and 1968 21 2.8 Water Act 1973 21 2.9 Control of Pollution Act 1974 21 2 .1 0 Water Act, 1989 and Water Resources Act, 1991 21 2.11 Environmental Protection Act, 1990 21 2.12 Environment Act 1995 21 2.13 International Legislation 22 2.14Paris Convention 23 2.15 North Sea Conference Declarations 23 Factors which Affect Water Quality in the Thames 24 Estuary 3.1Introduction 24 3.2 Dissolved Oxygen 24 3.3Temperature 24 3.4 Retention Time and Freshwater Flow 25 3.5 Re-Suspension and Settlement of Solids 25 3.6 Photosynthesis/Respiration and Eutrophication 26 3.7 Oxygen Absorption from the Atmosphere 26 3.8 Sewage Treatment Works and Storm Water Effects 27 3.9 Contaminants 28 The Pollution History and Clean-up 29 4.1 Introduction 29 4 .2 Cholera Epidemics 29 4.3 Metropolitan Commissioners of Sewers 1847 30 4.4 Metropolitan Board ofWorks 30 Contents 4.5 London County Council 31 6 Port of London'Authority 3 F 4.7 Thames Survey Committee and the Pippard Report 31 4.8 Recent History 1960 to 1989 ' ' ' ' 32 5. Current Quality Management of the Thames Estuary 36 _5.1 Introduction ____ ____ _ ___________________ _36 5.2 Water Quality Objectives 36 5.3 Monitoring 36 574 Water Quality Models 38~ 5.5 STW Discharges, River Flow, Storm Discharges and Operating 38 Agreem ents 5.6 Summer Conditions and Improved Operating Standards 41 for STW s 5.7 Storm Water Discharges 42 5.8 Freshwater Flow 43 5.9 Heavy Metals and Organic Micro-Pollutants 44 6. Quality Compliance of the Thames Estuary 47 6.1 Introduction 47 6.2 Dissolved Oxygen Compliance 47 6.3 Compliance with Environmental Quality Standards 49 6.4 1995 Compliance with Discharge Consents 49 7. The Biology of the Thames Estuary 51 7.1 Introduction 51 7.2 Invertebrates 51 7.3 Fish of theThames Estuary 53 7.4 Birds 56 8. Achievements, Priorities and Future Developments 57 8_. 1 Achievements _= = . _. 57, 8.2 Local Developments 5 7 8.3 National Developments 57 8.4 The Future 58 8.5 Conclusion 59 Bibliography 60 Glossary of Terms 61 Glossary of Abbreviations 63 Water Quality of the Tidal Thames Appendices 64 Appendix 1: Dangerous Substances Surface Water Regulations 64 1989 and 1992 Appendix 2: Natural Environmental Quality Standards for List II 65 Metals for the Protection o f Salt Water Life Appendix 3: U.K. Red List 66 Appendix 4: Annex 1A Substances 67 Appendix 5: Fish Species of the Thames Estuary 68 Acknowledgements Plate 1.1 TheThames Estuary Plate 1.3 TheThames Estuary at Canary Wharf Plate 1.4 Thames Estuary at Queen Elizabeth II Bridge Cover photograph All reproduced by permission of Chorley and Handford Ltd. List of Plates Cover Plate TheThames Estuary atTower Bridge cover Plate 1.1 T h eT h am es Estuary 10 Plate 1.2 TheThames Barrier 12 Plate 1.3 Thames Estuary at Canary Wharf 16 Plate 1.4 Thames Estuary at Queen Elizabeth II Bridge 17 Plate 1.5 Angling on theThames Estuary 18 Plate 4.1 Monster Soup 29 Plate 4.2 Faraday giving his card to Father Thames 30 Plate 4.3 TheThames Bubbler 35 Plate 7.1 Oligochaete worm 52 List of Figures Figure 1.1 Map ofThames Estuary showing main features 11 Figure 1.2 Annual Mean Abstraction fromThe River Thames 14 1 8 9 0 -1 9 9 4 Figure 1.3 Water Level Changes in the Chalk and Basal Sands Aquifer 14 Figure 3.1 Chloride Profile of theThames Estuary showing Saline 25 Intrusion for High and Low Flow Conditions Figure 3.2 Typical Oxygen Sag Curve Showing the Critical Point 27 Figure 4. la Decrease in Polluting Load Discharged to the Estuary 33 Figure 4.1 b Dissolved Oxygen Levels in the Tidal Thames between 33 1950 and 1980, April-September mean Figure 4.2 Dissolved Oxygen Profiles of the Estuary before, during 3 4 and after a storm event in 1977 Figure 5.2 Effective Oxygen Load from the Freshwater Thames in 40 Relation to the Flow for 1995 6 Figure 5.3 The Percentage Load Contributed to the Tideway by the 41 _ . — Fresh waterThames, Mogden , Grossness and Becklon:^. STWs in a High and Low Flow Period Figure 5.4 Modelled Effect of Reduced Abstraction on Dissolved 43 O xygen Figure 5.5 Dissolved Oxygen Profile, May-September mean, 4 4 showing improvement since 1989 Figure 5.6 ThamesTideway Pollution Incidents between [989 ___ _____ .46 and 1995 " Figure 6.1 Dissolved oxygen compliance for each quarter of 1995 4 7 -4 9 __Figure.7.. 1___Mean Macroinvertebrate Species-Number from-Thames -------- 5-2 Estuary Benthic Programme in 1994 Figure 7.2 Cumulative Fish Species Recorded inTidal Thames 54 (Fulham-Tilbury) 1964-1989 Figure 7.3 Confirmed Annual Returns of Salmon in theThames 55 Estuary 1979-1995 List of Tables Table 1.1 Riverine Inputs to theThames Estuary 1 3 Table 1.2 Population of London 15 Table 1.3 Population Density 16 Table 5.1 Standards and Water Quality Objectives for the Reaches 3 7 of theThames Estuary Tabl e5 .2 L oadsD isch argedfrom STWs 3 9 Table 5.3 Industrial Inputs____________________ _______________________ 39 Table 5.4 Freshwater Inputs 40 Table 5.5 Consent Standards for STWs in theThames Estuary 42 Table 5.6 Loads of Organic Micro-pollutants in Sewage and the Estuary 45 between 1991 and 1995 Table 6.1 Mean Concentration of List I Substances in theThames 50 Estuary, 1995 Table 6.2 Mean Concentrations of List II Metals in theThames 50 = Estuary, 1995 Table 6.3 Compliance with the bathing water directive 1991-1995 50 Water Quality of the Tidal Thames Executive Summary TheThames Estuary is now considered to be one of the cleanest metropolitan estuaries in the world. A great number of articles and papers have been written for books, journals, conferences and other local and international forums on the clean-up of theThames. This report, by the Environment Agency aims to bring together the various aspects of the historical and current water quality management of the Thames Estuary into one document. The report focuses on the success of the Environment Agency and previous regulatory bodies in achieving a water quality in the Estuary which sustains a thriving fish population and other biological life.
Recommended publications
  • Greater London Authority
    Consumer Expenditure and Comparison Goods Retail Floorspace Need in London March 2009 Consumer Expenditure and Comparison Goods Retail Floorspace Need in London A report by Experian for the Greater London Authority March 2009 copyright Greater London Authority March 2009 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978 1 84781 227 8 This publication is printed on recycled paper Experian - Business Strategies Cardinal Place 6th Floor 80 Victoria Street London SW1E 5JL T: +44 (0) 207 746 8255 F: +44 (0) 207 746 8277 This project was funded by the Greater London Authority and the London Development Agency. The views expressed in this report are those of Experian Business Strategies and do not necessarily represent those of the Greater London Authority or the London Development Agency. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 5 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 5 CONSUMER EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS .................................................................................... 6 CURRENT COMPARISON FLOORSPACE PROVISION ....................................................................... 9 RETAIL CENTRE TURNOVER........................................................................................................ 9 COMPARISON GOODS FLOORSPACE REQUIREMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Tc Walks Leaflet D5 (With 30 Years Logo)
    Introduction: This walk is approximately 11k long, taking about 3.5 hours to complete at a steady pace, along paved, gravel and unmade footpaths, K including parts of the London Loop and/or Ingrebourne Way FP136, as S R E L well as following some of the valley of the River Ingrebourne. C H U U R Q C E H H E Start: From the bus stand in Tees Drive at the junction with Noak Hill R S 1 O C O A L A D L C HILL FARM O E W K O Road (served by frequent bus routes from Hornchurch, Harold E 2 R N Wood and Romford), turn right into and cross Noak Hill Road D A ST. THOMAS’S CHURCH O onto the footpath opposite. Walk along this path and uphill for R L W IL 3 H about 500 metres to the junction with Church Road and K A O 1 N Chequers Road. Continue ahead along Chequers Road for MANOR FARM about 250 metres passed Manor Farm on your right until you E reach Lower Noke Close on the right. S DAGNAM PARK T 2 Turn right into Lower Noke Close through a large green metal A gate, signposted as the beginning of Ingrebourne Way FP136. 5 H 4 After about 250m the road turns left to go under the M25 (into H A DAGNAM HOUSE Wrightsbridge Road next to Old Macdonalds Farm). Continue ahead for about 300m along a C gravel path, which is an entrance to Dagnam Park (The Manor), with fields and woods on both MES sides.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Thames Phosphate Mode
    HP NRA RIV NRA The River Thames Phosphate Mode/ Improvements on the River Colne model -* Investigation o f high decay rates -*■ Effects of phosphate stripping at STWs Gerrie Veldsink March 19% CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY AND WATER QUALITY PLANNING 2 2.1 The National River Authority 2.2 The water Quality Planning Section in the Thames Region 3 3 THE RIVER THAMES PHOSPHATE MODEL 4 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 TOMCAT 6 4 COLNE MODEL IMPROVEMENTS 8 4.1 River Colne 8 4.2 Modelling the River Colne 9 4.2.1 Introduction 9 4.2.2 Data input 10 4.2.2.1 Flow upstream of the STWs 10 4.2.2.2 Flow downstream of the bifurcation 11 4.2.2.3 The accretional flow 11 4.2.2.4 The concentration of phosphate in the accretional flow 11 4.2.2.5 Flow and quality of discharge from STWs 11 4.2.2.6 Flow and quality of the River Misbourne 11 4.2.2.7 Sources of data and important files 12 4.2.2.8 Differences between the original model and the model in this study 13 4.2.3 Calibration (OctobeLl992 to October 1994) 14 4.2.4 Validation (lanuary 1982 to lanuary 1984) 15 4.2.5 Sensitivity ofJheXolne Mode\ 16 4.3 Conclusion 1 7 5 WORK ON THE RIVER THAMES MODEL 18 5.1 Introduction 18 5.2 Order of STW 18 5.3 High Decay Rates 18 5.3.1 Introduction 18 5.3.2 Reducing high decay rates 19 5.3 Effects of phosphate stripping at STWs 23 5.4 Conclusion 24‘ REFERENCE 25 APPENDICES Acknowledgement ACKNOWLEDGEMENT With great pleasure I fulfilled a three month practical period at the NRA Thames Region in Reading.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Stink of London
    This is an introduction to Stephen Halliday's book The Great Stink of London. During Victorian times, there were serious problems with water supply and sanitation in London. Crisis point was reached in the summer of 1858. The Great Stink of London In the mid-19th century, Britain was gripped by the fear of cholera, a highly infectious and deadly disease. When cholera struck Hamburg in Germany, the British government grew alarmed that this latest outbreak might spread to Britain. They decided to create a special committee to deal with the expected epidemic. However, the epidemic never happened because of the work of one man: Sir Joseph Bazalgette. At that time, London’s sewage flowed straight into the River Thames. From here it leaked into adjacent springs, wells and other sources of drinking water. This was the root cause of cholera, a waterborne disease. Contemporary accounts describe London being crowded with men, women and children struggling to survive in terrible conditions. In 1849, one journalist reported that the air had 'the smell of a graveyard, and a feeling of nausea comes over anyone unaccustomed to it.' About the Thames, he wrote, 'heavy bubbles now and then rise up in the water, which is covered with a scum like an encrusted cobweb. In it float large masses of noxious, tangled weed and against the posts of the bridges are swollen carcasses of dead animals.' In the summer of 1858, the stench from the Thames was so bad that Members of Parliament fled from the rooms overlooking the river. The Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, rushed from the debating chamber, handkerchief to nose.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Engineering
    Civil Engineering Volume 169 Issue CE2 May 2016 ■ Design and top-down construction at the Nanjing Youth Olympic Centre, China ■ Unleashing potential – the benefits of new infrastructure in the Balkans ■ Building to beat Ebola: the Royal Engineers in Sierra Leone ■ Use of shape-memory alloys in construction: a critical review www.civilengineering-ice.com ISSN 0965 089 X Call for Papers Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Civil Engineering Panel Chair and Honorary Editor: Emma Kent, Cundall Johnston & Partners LLP, UK Civil Engineering, indexed Why Publish with ICE? in Web of Science, is the ICE Publishing has been uniting research and ICE’s flagship journal. practice in engineering and science since 1836. As the publishing arm of the Institution of Civil Practical and diverse in its scope, Engineers, we provide exclusive access to over Civil Engineering publishes overview 80,000 active ICE members in 160 countries. papers for the non-specialist on any subject relevant to civil engineering By publishing with ICE, you will benefit from today. Multi-disciplined in approach, our quality, visibility and advocacy. topics range from landmark projects to philosophical, ethical, QUALITY environmental, management and safety issues. • Rigorous blind peer review by an international panel of experts Civil Engineering gives a wide- • Author editorial support and guidance to ranging insight into the engineering help you develop your work profession with full-colour papers 0.714 • Professional copy editing, typesetting and and articles on topics across the proof-reading services spectrum of civil engineering activity, topics range from landmark projects to debates on philosophical, ethical, • No publication charges, it is entirely free to environmental, management and safety issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Tideway
    www.WaterProjectsOnline.com Wastewater Treatment & Sewerage Thames Tideway Tunnel - Cofferdams Blackfriars & Albert Embankment marine works: Complex temporary works to enable the delivery of the new London’s super sewer by Maria Fernandez Ciudad, Francisco J Quesada Colmenero, Jose Flors Villaverde and Tim Harman he Thames Tideway Tunnel is a new super sewer that will intercept, store and convey the CSO discharges to Beckton STW for treatment. The project is divided into three main work contracts: West, Central and East. The TFerrovial Construction and Laing O’Rourke joint venture (FLO JV) has been appointed as principal contractor for the Central Section with an original estimated budget of £745m. The scope of the works of the Central Section includes the construction of a 12.7km new sewer tunnel under the River Thames between Fulham and Bermondsey. Eight CSO’s spread along the river will be connected through culverts to a new interception chamber and then to a 60m deep shaft structure. From the shaft, the flows will be conveyed into the main tunnel which is being excavated with two 8.8m diameter tunnel boring machines. Albert Embankment Foreshore shaft excavation - Courtesy of FLO JV Blackfriars Bridge Foreshore twin wall cofferdam - Courtesy of FLO JV Background The cofferdams are U-shaped structures tying-in against the London sewerage system dates from the 19th century, developed existing river wall and designed as either double skin or single by Joseph Bazalgette to serve a population of 4 million, with an skin cofferdams. This paper outlines the design and construction original capacity of 6mm rainfall per hour across the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of the National Rivers Authority the Law of the National Rivers Authority
    NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY NRA by Centre for Law in Rural A reas U.C.W. Aberystwyth Notional Rivers Aumortty Information Centre [Head Office Class No m Accossion No National Information Centre The Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West BRISTOL BS12 4UD Due for return THE LAW OF THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY THE LAW OF THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY by WILLIAM HOWARTH B.A., LL.M. Director of the Centre for Law in Rural Areas and Lecturer in Law, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth The National Rivers Authority and the Centre for Law in Rural Areas, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth 1990 © W illiam Howarth 1990 ISBN 1 872662 00 5 Published by The National Rivers Authority and the Centre for Law in Rural Areas, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth Copies of this work may be obtained from: The Director, Centre for Law in Rural Areas, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, SY23 3DZ. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. Printed by Cambrian Printers, Aberystwyth. FOREWORD The Water Act 1989 brings about a dramatic restructuring of the water industry in England and Wales through an overall separation of the responsibilities for utility and regulatory functions in relation to water. This division of the industry will allow a greater degree of specialism to be developed, and ultimately will prove more effective both in satisfying the needs of water consumers and also in safeguarding in general aquatic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ
    This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Wales
    Hydrogeology of Wales N S Robins and J Davies Contributors D A Jones, Natural Resources Wales and G Farr, British Geological Survey This report was compiled from articles published in Earthwise on 11 February 2016 http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Category:Hydrogeology_of_Wales BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2015. Hydrogeology of Wales Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. N S Robins and J Davies Bibliographical reference Contributors ROBINS N S, DAVIES, J. 2015. D A Jones, Natural Rsources Wales and Hydrogeology of Wales. British G Farr, British Geological Survey Geological Survey Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. Cover photo: Llandberis Slate Quarry, P802416 © NERC 2015. All rights reserved KEYWORTH, NOTTINGHAM BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2015 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS British Geological Survey offices shops at Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or BGS Central Enquiries Desk shop online at www.geologyshop.com Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 email [email protected] The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Thames
    1.0 Introduction The River Thames is probably the most recognised and best known river in the country and is often known as 'London's River' or 'Old Father Thames'. The River Thames was pivotal in the establishment of the city of London and people have lived along its banks for thousands of years. Today, over a fifth of the country’s population live within a few miles of it, and each day many thousands pass over, along and under it. The Thames is a transport route, a drain, a view, a site for redevelopment and, ever increasingly, a playground, classroom and wildlife corridor. Its habitats and species form an integral part of London’s identity and development. The tidal Thames of today is a good example of a recovering ecosystem and of great ecological importance not only to London, Kent and Essex but also to life in the North Sea and the upstream catchments of the upper Thames. Gravel foreshore, © Zoological Society of London The River Thames flows through Westminster with its high river embankments, overlooked by historic and modern buildings, crossed by seven bridges and overhung with hardy London Plane trees. In Westminster the river is tidal and exposes foreshore during low-tide over most of Tidal Thames this stretch. This foreshore is probably all that remains of the natural intertidal habitat that would have once extended The River Thames is probably the most recognised and best known river in the country and inland providing marsh and wetland areas. Within the Westminster tidal Thames plants, invertebrates and birds is often known as 'London's River' or 'Old Father Thames'.
    [Show full text]
  • London LOOP Section 22 Harold Wood to Upminster Bridge
    V4 : May 2011V4 : May London LOOP Directions: Exit Harold Wood station by the stairs at the end of the platform Section 22 to join the LOOP route which passes the station‟s main exit. Harold Wood to Upminster Bridge Once outside the station and on Gubbins Lane turn left then left again into Oak Road. Follow the road straight ahead past Athelstan Road and Ethelburga Road – lots of Saxon names here - and then go down Archibald Road, the third street on the right. Go through the metal barrier onto the gravel road passing the houses on the right and the Ingrebourne River quietly flowing by on the left. Continue on the short stretch of tarmac road to the busier Squirrels Heath Road and turn right. Start: Harold Wood (TQ547905) Station: Harold Wood After a short distance turn left into the modest Brinsmead Road A which Finish: Upminster Bridge (TQ550868) leads to Harold Wood Park. Station: Upminster Bridge Go through the gate and turn immediately right onto the path. Just before Distance: 4 miles (6.9 km) the carpark turn left to follow the tarmac path along the avenue of trees, passing tennis courts on the right. At the end of the path turn left and go past the children‟s playground on the right. A footbridge comes into view on Introduction: This section goes through Pages Wood - a superb new the right. Go over the Ingrebourne River via the wooden footbridge to enter community woodland of 74 hectares, as well as other mysterious woodland, Pages Wood. Turn right and follow the gravel path.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Conservancy Act, 1950
    Thames Conservancy Act, 1950 14 GEO. 6 Cli. 1 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short and collective titles. 2. Division of Act into Parts. 3. Amending definition of Thames in Act of 1932. 4. Interpretation. 5. Repeal of enactments. PART II CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS OF CONSERVATORS 6. Constitution of Conservators. 7. Increase in number of Conservators. 8. Term of office of Conservators. 9. Conservator interested in a contract. 10. As to contracts. PART III FURTHER POWERS IN RELATION TO CONSERVANCY NAVIGATION ETC. 11. Amendment of sections 69 70 and 71 of Act of 1932. 12. Power to enter and inspect vessels. 13. Name of launch to be conspicuously displayed. 14. Amendment of section 92 of Act of 1932. 15. Owner of pleasure boat to afford information as to person in charge. 16. Removal of sunk stranded or abandoned vessels. PART IV LANDS 17. Purchase of lands. PART V PREVENTION OF POLLUTION 18. Special interpretation relating to pollution. 19. Map of Thames catchment area. A Ch. I Thames Conservancy 14 GEO. 6 Act, 1950 Section 20. Amendment of section 124 of Act of 21. Sanitary authorities owners and occupiers to afford information. 22. Provision in case of neglect of sanitary authority to perform certain duties. 23. Inspection of sanitary arrangements of vessels. 24. Removal of dead animals. PART VI CHARGES ON VESSELS MERCHANDISE ETC. (a) Tolls on merchandise traffic 25. Tolls on merchandise traffic. (b) Tolls for piers 26. Tolls leviable at piers and landing places. (c) Lock tolls and charges on pleasure boats 27. Lock tolls on pleasure boats.
    [Show full text]