Tilenth Ctrntury Stancling Until the Abolition of the Old Lor-Rdon Bridge in R83r
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ
This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system. -
Thames Conservancy Act, 1950
Thames Conservancy Act, 1950 14 GEO. 6 Cli. 1 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short and collective titles. 2. Division of Act into Parts. 3. Amending definition of Thames in Act of 1932. 4. Interpretation. 5. Repeal of enactments. PART II CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS OF CONSERVATORS 6. Constitution of Conservators. 7. Increase in number of Conservators. 8. Term of office of Conservators. 9. Conservator interested in a contract. 10. As to contracts. PART III FURTHER POWERS IN RELATION TO CONSERVANCY NAVIGATION ETC. 11. Amendment of sections 69 70 and 71 of Act of 1932. 12. Power to enter and inspect vessels. 13. Name of launch to be conspicuously displayed. 14. Amendment of section 92 of Act of 1932. 15. Owner of pleasure boat to afford information as to person in charge. 16. Removal of sunk stranded or abandoned vessels. PART IV LANDS 17. Purchase of lands. PART V PREVENTION OF POLLUTION 18. Special interpretation relating to pollution. 19. Map of Thames catchment area. A Ch. I Thames Conservancy 14 GEO. 6 Act, 1950 Section 20. Amendment of section 124 of Act of 21. Sanitary authorities owners and occupiers to afford information. 22. Provision in case of neglect of sanitary authority to perform certain duties. 23. Inspection of sanitary arrangements of vessels. 24. Removal of dead animals. PART VI CHARGES ON VESSELS MERCHANDISE ETC. (a) Tolls on merchandise traffic 25. Tolls on merchandise traffic. (b) Tolls for piers 26. Tolls leviable at piers and landing places. (c) Lock tolls and charges on pleasure boats 27. Lock tolls on pleasure boats. -
An Innovative Organizational Arrangement for Comprehensive Water Services; the Thames Water Authority As a Model for Complex '
.3 An Innovative Organizational Arrangement for Comprehensive Water Services; The Thames Water Authority as a Model for Complex ',. Urban Areas of the Great Lakes JONATHAN W. BULKLEY THOMAS A. GROSS September 1975 Research Project Technical Completion Report OWRT Project No. A-083-MICH Grant No. 14-31-0001-5022 Program in Resource Policy and Management School of Natural Resources ~\\lV 0, ~~~ Department of Civil Engineering z ; : College of Engineering ::::a - -... ~~ ~O) './ 1811 ~ . I I \, ..J .-_. __. ... .:..,.~- ..L. J ...;J...; " ..L..J.. c.t',"" '...., _n~,l_.>...J TNTPRTOR__•• - _.J. - D AN INNOVATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR COMPREHENSIVE WATER SERVICES r. The ~Thames Water Authority as a Model for Complex Urban Areas of the Great Lakes by ,/ Jonathan W. Bulkley Principal Investigator and C Thomas A. Gross Research Project Technical Completion Report OWRT Project No. A-083-MICH Grant No. 14-31-0001-5022 Research Investigation Period: January - September 1975 Submi tted to the Office of Water Research and Technology U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D. C. Program in Resource Policy and Management School of Natural Resources Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan September 1975 ABSTRACT A need exists for regional consideration and eval uation of comprehensive water services in complex urban areas. The Thames Water Authority (TWA) in England pro vides such comprehensive water services to the entire Thames River Basin including metropolitan London; an area of 5000 square miles with a population of 12 million. In recognition of the possible application of such a con cept to complex urban areas of the Great Lakes, the prin cipal investigator spent six months as a participant-observer with the Authority and provides a detailed description of its organization and operation. -
The New River Improvement Project 7Th September 2017 Claudia Innes
The New River Improvement Project 7th September 2017 Claudia Innes Community Projects Executive Corporate Responsibility Team ∗ Team of 18 - Education, community investment, volunteering and nature reserves ∗ Manage a £6.5 million community investment fund between 2014 and 2019 ∗ Aim to engage customers and communities through: ∗ environmental enhancement ∗ improving access and recreation ∗ educational outreach Governance • All funding applicants apply by form. • All spend is approved in advance by our Charities Committee • A Memorandum Of Understanding is generated to release the funds to the partner. 3 The New River – a brief history ∗ Aqueduct completed in 1613 by Goldsmith and Adventurer Hugh Myddelton and Mathematician Edward Wright. ∗ King James I agreed to provide half the costs on condition he received half of the profits ∗ Total cost of construction was £18,500. ∗ Essential part of London’s water supply. 48 million gallons a day are carried for treatment. The New River – a brief history ∗ Originally fed only by sources at Chadwell and Amwell Springs. ∗ The course of the New River now ends at Stoke Newington East Reservoir (Woodberry Wetlands). ∗ Water levels are regulated by sluices. Path development ∗ The New River Path was developed over 12 years at a cost of over £2 million ∗ 28 miles from Hertfordshire to North London. ∗ We have worked in partnership with, and with the support of, many organisations; including Groundwork, the New River Action Group, Friends of New River Walk, schools and communities, and all the local authorities -
Sir William Cubitt
1 THE EASTERLING JOURNAL OF THE EASTANGLIAN WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION VOLUME NINE, NUMBER NINE JUNE 2014 Edited by Alan H. Faulkner 43 Oaks Drive, Colchester, Essex CO3 3PS Phone 01206 767023 E-mail [email protected] ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING The 44 th Annual General Meeting was held on Sunday 18 May based on St. Mary’s Church Hall, Westry, March in Cambridgeshire. The day started off with a visit to the nearby boatyard operated by Fox Narrow Boats where we were met by Paula Syred, daughter of the late Charlie Fox who had established the business in 1959. Members were given an interesting presentation of how the company had developed before looking round the marina and being able to inspect two of the current hire boats – Leisurely Fox and Silver Fox - both of which looked extremely smart. And then it was back to St. Marys where we were fortunate in being able to look round the recently restored church that had suffered an arson attack four years ago. Members then enjoyed an excellent luncheon laid on by Margaret Martin and her team before turning to the formal business of the day. 2 The Director’s Report and Accounts for the year ending 30 June 2013 were duly, approved before Alan Faulkner, David Mercer and Jeff Walters were re-elected as Directors and John Cordran was re-elected as Accounts Scrutineer. Chris Black then gave a full report about the progress on the North Walsham & Dilham Canal and the meeting concluded with a report by Chairman Roger which centred round the Environment Agency’s reduction in dredging and maintenance. -
Colne Valley Park: a Brief History
Colne Valley Park: A Brief History The Colne Valley Regional Park was established in 1967 View of the Park today to preserve areas suitable for leisure, recreation and con- servation to the west of London, between Rickmansworth and Staines. The area that is now the Park has been val- ued by different people for different reasons at different times and many of those long since dead former inhabi- tants of the area have left traces of their way of life. Palaeolithic (400, 000 – 8, 500 BC) The earliest traces of people in the Park date to around 400,000 BC. During this geological period (the Pleisto- cene) vast sheets of ice advanced from Polar regions to cover much of Britain. There were numerous climatic changes with cold or ‘glacial’ phases, alternating with more temperate ‘interglacial’ phases. The dramatic changes in temperature are associated with changes in flora and fauna. It was during this period that rivers de- posited gravel, silt and sand within the Colne Valley, and it has been during gravel extraction that evidence for this period has been recovered. During the milder periods Chorleywood Stone Age people would have inhabited the region. Colne Valley RICKMANSWORTH Evidence is limited due to the changes wrought on the Park: landscape by the ice and all that survives are remains of Maple Cross abraded flint tools, moved from their original location and Chalfont Common re-deposited in riverbeds. Yiewsley (just outside the bor- Chalfont St Peter Harefield ders of the park) is one of the most important sites in Europe for this period, and the earliest tools found here Gerrards Cross are crudely modified rocks. -
Woodberry Wetlands (Stoke Newington Reservoirs)
Woodberry Wetlands (Stoke Newington Reservoirs) 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 29th May 2017 Current status Document last updated Tuesday, 28th August 2018 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: • The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. • Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. • This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. • All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2017-2018, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Woodberry Wetlands (Stoke Newington Reservoirs) Start: Finsbury Park Station Finish: Stoke Newington Overground or Manor House Underground Length: 6.9 km/4.3 mi (Stoke Newington Ending) or 5.0 km/3.1 mi (Manor House Ending) Time: 1 hour 45 mins for the Stoke Newington Ending, 1 hour 15 mins for the Manor House Ending. Transport: Finsbury Park Station is served by Main Line Services from Kings Cross, and by the Victoria and Piccadilly Lines. -
Finsbury Park
FINSBURY PARK Park Management Plan 2020 (minor amendments January 2021) Finsbury Park: Park Management Plan amended Jan 2021 Section Heading Page Contents Foreword by Councillor Hearn 4 Draft open space vision in Haringey 5 Purpose of the management plan 6 1.0 Setting the Scene 1.1 Haringey in a nutshell 7 1.2 The demographics of Haringey 7 1.3 Deprivation 8 1.4 Open space provision in Haringey 8 2.0 About Finsbury Park 2.1 Site location and description 9 2.2 Facilities 9 2.3 Buildings 17 2.4 Trees 18 3.0 A welcoming place 3.1 Visiting Finsbury Park 21 3.2 Entrances 23 3.3 Access for all 24 3.4 Signage 25 3.5 Toilet facilities and refreshments 26 3.6 Events 26 4.0 A clean and well-maintained park 4.1 Operational and management responsibility for parks 30 4.2 Current maintenance by Parks Operations 31 4.3 Asset management and project management 32 4.4 Scheduled maintenance 34 4.5 Setting and measuring service standards 38 4.6 Monitoring the condition of equipment and physical assets 39 4.7 Tree maintenance programme 40 4.8 Graffiti 40 4.9 Maintenance of buildings, equipment and landscape 40 4.10 Hygiene 40 5.0 Healthy, safe and secure place to visit 5.1 Smoking 42 5.2 Alcohol 42 5.3 Walking 42 5.4 Health and safety 43 5.5 Reporting issues with the ‘Love Clean Streets’ app 44 5.6 Community safety and policing 45 5.7 Extending Neighbourhood Watch into parks 45 5.8 Designing out crime 46 5.9 24 hour access 48 5.10 Dogs and dog control orders 49 6.0 Sustainability 6.1 Greenest borough strategy 51 6.2 Pesticide use 51 6.3 Sustainable use of -
London and Its Main Drainage, 1847-1865: a Study of One Aspect of the Public Health Movement in Victorian England
University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 6-1-1971 London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England Lester J. Palmquist University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Palmquist, Lester J., "London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England" (1971). Student Work. 395. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LONDON .ML' ITS MAIN DRAINAGE, 1847-1865: A STUDY OF ONE ASPECT OP TEE PUBLIC HEALTH MOVEMENT IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Lester J. Palmquist June 1971 UMI Number: EP73033 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73033 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. -
Download: Pre-Submission Canalside DPD 2020
Warwick District Council CANALSIDE DRAFT DPD PRE-SUBMISSION March 2020 01 Contents 1. BACKGROUND: 26 Access 05 National and Local Policies 27 Flooding 06 Neighbourhood 28 Water Abstraction Development Plans 28 Residential Moorings 07 The Extent of this DPD 29 Marinas 07 Conservation Area 29 Future Pressures 2. CONTEXT: 5. OPTIONS 09 The Grand Union Canal, 09 The Stratford Upon Avon 31 Identifying the Potential and Birmingham and 32 Sydenham Industrial Estate Fazeley Canals 32 Cape Road/Millers Road 10 The History of Canals in 32 Montague Road Warwick District 12. How the Use of Canals 33 Recent Developments on the Has Changed Local Plan Sites 14 What Has Happened 33 Other Opportunity Sites Elsewhere? 6. POLICIES 3. THE CANAL 37 Site Specific Policies CONSERVATION AREA 7. IS THERE ANY FUTURE 4. ISSUES FOR CANALS AS FREIGHT 22 Biodiversity CORRIDORS 22 Rubbish Dumping 23 Crime and the Perception of Crime APPENDICES 23 Drug Dealing APPENDIX 1: Other Opportunity 23 Vandalism Sites Analysis 24 Aesthetics APPENDIX 2: Canalside Listed Buildings 25 HS2 APPENDIX 3: Constraints 26 Vacant and Underused Buildings 02 03 SECTION 1 BACKGROUND 04 1.1 What is a Development Plan Document (DPD)and why is one being prepared for the canals within the district? National and Local Policy Documents 1.2 The district adopted its Local Plan in Sept 2017. The Local Plan sets out the framework for future development in the district; how much, where it will be and how it will be supported in terms of infrastructure. The Plan runs from 2011 to 2029. It contains both allocations for land uses, including housing and employment, and policies by which planning applications will be assessed by development management staff and Planning Committee members. -
The Hydrography & Cartography of a Great
THE HYDROGRAPHY & CARTOGRAPHY OF A GREAT SEAPORT by C o m m a n d e r E. C. SHANKLAHD, R. H. R., F. R . S. E., R i v e r S uperintendent a n d H ydrographic S u r v e y o r , P o r t o f L o n d o n A u t h o r i t y . The Port of London Authority exercises jurisdiction over that part of the Thames which flows from Teddington Lock (approximately) to a line joining Havengore Creek in Essex and Warden Point in Sheppey, Kent. To depict the changes in the hydrography of the channels, creeks, whar ves, bridges and dock entrances the survey of the river requires continuous attention. CARTOGRAPHY. Within the dock system a regular watch is kept to maintain depth, as a considerable amount of silt in suspension finds its way inside the tidal gates. The triangulation and surveyor’s working sheets are connected with those of the Ordnance Survey and are divided up into convenient lengths of river, more or less identified with the Reaches so well known to mariners. The survey sheets and the scales on which they are projected are enumerated in the following table. LIST OF SURVEYS — RIVER THAMES TIDEWAY Chxvt Section of River. Date of Scale Survey i. 1929 1/1056 2. Cross Deep to Petersham Drawdock.................................................... 1929 )) 3- Petersham Drawdock to Richmond Lock and Weir........................ 1929 )) )) 4 - Richmond Lock and Weir to Church Ferry, Isleworth.................. 1928 *>• 1928 )) 6. 1927 )) )) 7- 1926-7 8. Barnes R ailw ay Bridge to Chiswick Ferry......................................... -
London LOOP Section 11 Hayes and Harlington to Uxbridge
V1 : July July 09 V1 : London LOOP Directions: Leave the station, and turn right down Station Road. Go Section 11 straight over the mini roundabout, cross the canal bridge then turn right at the end of the bridge into Western View. Take the steps on the right which Hayes and Harlington to Uxbridge lead down to the towpath of the Grand Union Canal and the London LOOP. Turn right at the bottom of the steps and go under the bridge. The picturesque Grand Union Canal links London to Birmingham, which supposedly has more canals than Venice! It’s the longest single canal in Britain stretching 135 miles. Start: Hayes & Harlington (TQ098795) Squeeze through the metal kissing gate, and keep following the towpath. Station: Hayes & Harlington Finish: Uxbridge (TQ051845) On the right is a traditional cast-iron milepost saying ‘Braunston 87 Miles.’ Station: Uxbridge The reason behind the mileposts was to tell approaching boaters the distances to the end of the canal and to assist in the collection of tolls. The Distance: 7.5 miles (12 km) G.J.C. on the mile post stands for the Grand Junction Canal, the original title of the ambitious 93 mile long canal approved by Act of Parliament in 1793 to link Braunston in Northamptonshire with Brentford in London. Introduction: A good section for enthusiasts of waterside walking, as over two-thirds follows canal, river or lake. After a few hundred yards there is another kissing gate. Go through and keep following the path under a modern brick bridge. This is an easy walk on mostly level ground with a few short climbs.