Offshore Transportation of Norwegian Gas to Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Offshore Transportation of Norwegian Gas to Europe OFFSHORE TRANSPORTATION OF NORWEGIAN GAS TO EUROPE The case of The Barents Sea Gas Infrastructure Doctor of Business Administration HENLEY BUSINESS SCHOOL Michael Ingenbleek January 2018 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Michael Ingenbleek. I At the basis of the monopoly of the Standard Oil Company in the production and distribution of petroleum products rests the pipe line. The possession of these pipelines enables the Standard to absolutely control the price which its competitor in each given locality shall pay. (ICC, 1907 cited in Boyce, 2014 pp.5) II Introduction This study is concerned with Norway’s role in supplying gas to Europe through offshore pipelines. One reason for choosing this topic is the difference in available research between the number one supplier of gas to Europe, Russia, and the number two, Norway, where there is much less published research. This study aims to bridge the gap by considering, for the Norwegian gas Sector, issues of gas supply, a competitive gas market, a sustainable effective, efficient offshore infrastructure and access for all where and when it is required. It further explores whether the regulation of the Norwegian Gas Sector, through national regulations, the Gas Target Model and three EU gas directives is meeting its goals or actually hinders development. Another reason to choose this subject is the low volume of investments in the Norwegian gas offshore infrastructure, which consequently will lead to reduced volumes of supply. In relation to the abovementioned, the third reason is to investigate whether current and anticipated prices justify further investment in Norwegian natural resources and offshore infrastructure. The fourth reason is to explore the possibilities and preferences for Europe to support investment in Norway’s most promising sector, the Barents Sea, or if competition and pricing do not warrant further investment. III Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... III TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................. IV ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................... IX 1. NORWAY AS A MAJOR GAS TRANSPORTER ................... 1 1.1. Introduction .............................................................................. 1 1.2. Developing natural resources - a historical perspective ........ 2 1.3. Fields and infrastructure expansion ..................................... 16 1.4. Responsibilities and relationships ......................................... 22 1.5. Research questions, methodology and disposition ............. 33 2. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ............................................ 38 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................ 38 2.2. Factors on market failure ....................................................... 50 2.3. Transaction cost economics ................................................... 60 2.4. Principal-Agent theory........................................................... 64 2.5. Conclusion .............................................................................. 69 3. REGULATIONS AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS............ 71 3.1. Introduction ............................................................................ 71 3.2. European union regulations .................................................. 72 3.3. Infrastructure investment barriers ........................................ 85 3.4. Investment solutions .............................................................. 89 3.5. Conclusion .............................................................................. 99 4. REGULATORY FACTORS ON THE NCS...........................103 4.1. Introduction ...........................................................................103 IV 4.2. Norwegian governmental organisation ...............................105 4.3. Revenue and cash flow .........................................................122 4.4. Infrastructure development processes .................................128 4.5. Conclusion .............................................................................136 5. NORWAY’S ROLE IN THE NATURAL GAS MARKET ...140 5.1. Introduction ...........................................................................140 5.2. External suppliers of gas .......................................................144 5.3. Asia and the role of the USA ................................................150 5.4. Norway’s role over the next two decades ...........................155 5.5. Conclusion .............................................................................158 6. NORWEGIAN SEA GAS INFRASTRUCTURE ..................160 6.1. Introduction ...........................................................................160 6.2. Resources, reserves and potential ........................................161 6.3. Description of the project ......................................................168 6.4. Analysis ..................................................................................169 6.5. Conclusion .............................................................................179 7. BARENTS SEA GAS INFRASTRUCTURE ..........................183 7.1. Introduction ...........................................................................183 7.2. Transmission systems ...........................................................188 7.3. BSGI project assumptions .....................................................196 7.4. Analysis ..................................................................................202 7.5. Conclusion .............................................................................206 8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .....................................209 8.1. Research motivation and problem definition ......................209 8.2. Theoretical considerations ....................................................211 8.3. Case studies ...........................................................................216 8.4. An Unchanging supply of gas ..............................................222 8.5. Recommendations on further research ................................224 REFERENCES ................................................................................225 V APPENDIX ....................................................................................253 1) Pipeline calculations ..............................................................253 2) NPD resource classes and project status categories ............254 3) A Considerations on capacity calculation ...........................256 4) Compressor power ................................................................260 5) Public and private ownership ..............................................262 6) Credit ratings .........................................................................264 7) NOK Exchange rate 1960-2017 .............................................266 8) Conversion table ....................................................................268 9) Financial equations ................................................................268 10) Summary EU regulations ......................................................269 Table of Figures Figure 1 The Norwegian continental shelf ...................................... 5 Figure 2 Awarded licenses from 1965 onwards ........................... 13 Figure 3 Licencing rounds and acreage 1965-2015. ...................... 15 Figure 4 layout of the NCS ............................................................. 17 Figure 5 North Sea water depths and the Norwegian trench ..... 19 Figure 6 Gassled ownership ex-ante and ex-post 2010 ................ 29 Figure 7 Research outline ............................................................... 36 Figure 8 State organisation of petroleum activities .....................105 Figure 9 Organisation of sales in the GFU period .......................119 Figure 10 Gassco-Gassled Sales construction ..............................120 Figure 11 Procedures for development and operation ...............131 Figure 12 Investments in pipelines and facilities on the NCS ....134 Figure 13 EU28 Gross European consumption. ...........................141 Figure 14 EU Energy production (Mtoe)......................................143 Figure 15 Gas - production, net imports and demand ................144 Figure 16 EU natural gas import in Twh. ....................................145 Figure 17 Short, medium, long- term LNG trade 2010-2014 ......147 VI Figure 18 Additional LNG capacity 2005-2020 ............................149 Figure 19 Natural gas prices across five regions .........................152 Figure 20 Resource account on the NCS in 2017. ........................163 Figure 21 Historical production versus resources. ......................164 Figure 22 Total resources per region. ...........................................165 Figure 23 Undiscovered resources per region. ............................166 Figure 24 total recoverable undiscovered resources. .................167 Figure 25 Polarled pipeline ...........................................................169 Figure 26 IRR E&P vs Gassled ......................................................172 Figure 27 Resource discoveries in 4-year periods (2000-2015) ...184 Figure 28 Barents Sea natural gas resources. ...............................185 Figure 29
Recommended publications
  • Ormen Lange and Nyhamna Expansion the Ormen Lange Story
    ORMEN LANGE AND NYHAMNA EXPANSION THE ORMEN LANGE STORY 2001 PHASE 1 – DEVELOPMENT OF ORMEN LANGE AND NYHAMNA 2002 Nyhamna is selected as the land facility for the Ormen Lange gas. 2003 Start up of development offshore and onshore 2004 - the bigges ever industry project in Norwegian history. 2005 West Navigator starts drilling the world’s largest gas wells. 2006 Shell takes over as operator of Ormen Lange. First gas. 2007 PHASE 2 – ORMEN LANGE IN OPERATION 2008 First full year of operation. More wells are drilled. Tuning of the facility optimises production. First hot tap and x-mas tree installation from vessel instead of rig. 2009 2010 A fourth well template is installed north 2011 on the field. Start-up of subsea compression test pilot. 2012 PHASE 3 – FURTHER DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION OF NYHAMNA 2013 Start of the Nyhamna expansion project. Further development of Ormen Lange includes drilling of more wells, exploration of near field opportunities and seismic 2014 surveys. Photo: Lars Øvrum IMPORTANT FOR EUROPE. Ormen Lange exports natural gas to Europe, and has covered about 20 per cent of the UK’s total gas consumption since 2009. 20% Stable and reliable gas supply from Norway is important for ORMEN LANGE SUPPLIES EU countries that want improved utilisation of nearby resources THE UK WITH UP TO 20 PER - thereby reducing their dependency on gas import from outside CENT OF THE COUNTRY’S Europe. GAS NEEDS When the expansion project at Nyhamna is completed, the facility will be able to deliver gas equivalent to the consumption of 22 million homes in the UK and continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • J.Kenneth Klitz
    J. Kenneth Klitz i: ;,-_ .. ...... l~ t :. i \ NORTH SEA OIL RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE U.K. SECTOR From the first exploration wells in 1964 to virtual self­ sufficiency by 1980, the development of the U. K. North Sea oil fields has been rapid and productive. However, the hostile environment and the sheer scale of the operation have made heavy demands on both natural and human resources. Just how large has this investment of resources been? Has it been justified by the amount of energy recovered? What lessons does the development of the North Sea hold for operators of other offshore fields? Using an approach developed at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, J. Kenneth Klitz attempts to answer these questions. He presents a wealth of detailed information obtained from exhaus­ tive Iiterature searches and close cooperation with the North Sea oil companies themselves, and uses it to in­ vestigate the resources needed to construct and operate the various field installations and facilities. From this starting point he then derives the total amounts of re­ sources required to develop first each field and then the entire U.K. sector. To put this resource expenditure in perspective, the author describes the way in which estimates of North Sea oil reserves have evolved and examines the addi­ tional yields that may be obtained by using technolog­ ically advanced oil-recovery methods; also included is an interesting comparison of the "energy economics" of producing either gas or oil from the North Sea. Finally, there are extensive descriptions of the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of UK
    NEW CHALLENGES FOR UK NATURAL GAS Steve R Jackson, Adrian J Finn & Terry R Tomlinson Costain Oil, Gas & Process Limited Manchester, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The United Kingdom’s self-sufficiency in natural gas has rapidly declined and for the first time the UK has become a net importer of natural gas. Dependence on imported natural gas is set to increase significantly. Some forecasts show the UK may need to import up to 40% of supplies by 2010 and up to 90% by 2020. Winter gas prices are now a factor of 10 higher than 4 years ago and this is seriously impacting big industrial consumers such as ammonia producers and power generators. At present, the main projected increase in imported gas is from Norway, mainly via the Langeled pipeline which landfalls in north-east England (carrying gas from the giant Ormen-Lange development by 2007/8) and from Europe via the existing Zeebrugge-Bacton Interconnector and the Balgzand-Bacton pipeline (operational by 2007). The latter two lines will link the UK with the European gas grid and may open up potential supply sources from the Former Soviet Union (FSU). Several LNG import terminal projects have been undertaken. The first to be completed is on the Isle of Grain near London, which commenced LNG imports during 2005. Two further LNG import terminals, Dragon and South Hook, are under construction at Milford Haven in Wales but will not be fully operational form some years. A further potential development is the upgrade of the former LNG import terminal at Canvey Island, near London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Economic Growth in Norway: Transitioning from the Petroleum Industry to Renewable Energy Industries
    La Salle International School of Commerce and Digital Economy Final Thesis Graduate in Management of Business and Technology THE CHALLENGES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORWAY: TRANSITIONING FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY TO RENEWABLE ENERGY INDUSTRIES Student Promoter Kristin Anette Kjuul Eoin Edward Phillips FINAL PROJECT DEFENCE Meeting of the evaluating panel on this day, the student: Kristin Anette Kjuul Presented their final thesis on the following subject: The Challenges of Economic Growth in Norway: Transitioning from the Petroleum Industry to Renewable Energy Industries At the end of the presentation and upon answering the questions of the members of the panel, this thesis was awarded the following grade: Barcelona, MEMBER OF THE PANEL MEMBER OF THE PANEL PRESIDENT OF THE PANEL The Challenges of Economic Growth in Norway: Transitioning from the Petroleum Industry to Renewable Energy Industries By Kristin Anette Kjuul Abstract This thesis attempts to answer the ways in which the transition from the petroleum industry to renewable energy industries may come about while ensuring sustained economic growth. An historical analysis of the relations between the Norwegian petroleum industry, the state, and private industry has been conducted in order to build a model of the most effective interaction between technology, energy companies and economic growth. Review of existing literature has been carried out to explore the current links between the petroleum industry and the renewable energy industry. Primary research, in the form of surveys and
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Uk Gas Supplies
    October 2004 Number 230 THE FUTURE OF UK GAS SUPPLIES The UK’s gas reserves are declining. Government and from self-sufficiency to import dependency on the industry analysts estimate that by around 2006 the UK security of UK energy supplies.5 This is because gas is will no longer be self-sufficient in gas production and also integral to the UK’s electricity generation industry, so will revert to being a net gas importer. Gas is the that security of gas supply cannot be decoupled from largest proportion of the UK’s primary energy supply, security of electricity supply. Gas is expected to continue and gas-fired power plants are the main method of to play a large role in future electricity generation power generation. The UK will increasingly depend on especially as nuclear facilities reach the end of their gas imported from Europe and further afield. This operational lives and carbon emission reductions force POSTnote examines the UK’s options for dealing with a the modernisation or closure of older coal-fired power diminishing domestic gas supply and for ensuring future plants. The 2003 Energy White Paper does not set gas security. specific targets for the share of gas in the total energy mix. Instead the Government prefers to create a market Background framework which encourages investment in a diversity of The UK relies on gas to provide energy for heating and energy sources. However, estimates suggest that the electricity more than any other primary energy source.1 minimum share of gas in electricity generation will rise to 39% of the UK’s primary energy comes from gas, 46% by 2012 and some analysts suggest this figure compared with 35% from oil, 15% from coal, 9% from could be as high as over 60%.
    [Show full text]
  • APG Flaring in Egypt: Addressing Regulatory Constraints
    APG Flaring in Egypt: Addressing Regulatory Constraints Final Options Report November 2017 Submitted to EBRD by: Economic Consulting Associates Environics Carbon Counts Economic Consulting Associates Limited 41 Lonsdale Road, London NW6 6RA, UK tel: +44 20 7604 4546, fax: +44 20 7604 4547 Egypt_Gaswww.eca Flaring_Options-uk.com Report_Final_Clean 11/12/2017 Disclaimer Disclaimer This report is prepared from sources and data which Economic Consulting Associates Limited believes to be reliable, but Economic Consulting Associates Limited makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness. The report is provided for informational purposes and is not to be construed as providing endorsements, representations or warranties of any kind whatsoever. Economic Consulting Associates Limited accepts no liability for any consequences whatsoever of pursuing any of the recommendations provided in this report, either singularly or altogether. Opinions and information provided are made as of the date of the report issue and are subject to change without notice. ECA - Final Options Report i Contents Contents Abbreviations and acronyms v Executive Summary 6 1 Introduction 12 2 Gas flaring in Egypt 15 2.1 Background: gas market 15 2.2 Gas flaring levels and location 20 2.3 Production Sharing Contracts 23 2.4 Regulatory framework 26 2.5 Institutional framework 30 3 Constraints to gas flaring reduction investments 35 3.1 PSC constraints 35 3.2 Regulatory constraints 37 3.3 Wider investment constraints 40 3.4 Institutional constraints 42 3.5 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation Under Uncertainty: the Co-Evolution of Industry and Regulation in the Norwegian Offshore Gas and Oil Industry
    Regulation under Uncertainty: The Co-evolution of Industry and Regulation in the Norwegian Offshore Gas and Oil Industry Charles Sabel1, Gary Herrigel2 and Peer Hull Kristensen3 December 2014 This project was financed by a generous grant from the Citi Foundation and supported by the SNF - Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration in Bergen. We are deeply indebted to Knut Thorvaldsen and Bodil Sophia Krohn of Norsk olje & gass and to Anna Vatten and Paul Bang of the PSA for their thoughtful hospitality and remarkable openness. We thank Jon Krokeide, the chairperson of the Drilling Managers Forum, and widely admired in the industry for his technical prowess and keen judgment, for allowing us to observe his working group at work and helping us understand what we saw. Ole Andreas Engen has been a stimulating interlocutor and guide to the strengths and vulnerabilities of the Norwegian or Nordic model of tri-partite regulation. Per Heum’s early enthusiasm for the project bolstered our own resolve at critical points. Without the help and guidance of them all it would have been impossible to enter the closely-knit world of offshore production in Norway. Error is ours alone. 1 Columbia Law School 2 University of Chicago 3 Copenhagen Business School 1. Introduction As production becomes more collaborative, involving key suppliers of complex sub- systems and services in design and production, products and production methods become more innovative but more hazardous. Collaborative production by supply chains connecting independent specialists is highly innovative: Unlike the captive component makers of vertically integrated firms they displace, independent suppliers learn rapidly from pooled experience with a wide range of customers; close cooperation between these competent suppliers and final producers allows rapid improvement in the designs of each.4 But this innovative recombination of knowledge also introduces hidden hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Nord Stream: Not Just a Pipeline
    FNI Report 15/2008 Nord Stream: Not Just a Pipeline An analysis of the political debates in the Baltic Sea region regarding the planned gas pipeline from Russia to Germany Bendik Solum Whist Nord Stream: Not Just a Pipeline An analysis of the political debates in the Baltic Sea Region regarding the planned gas pipeline from Russia to Germany Bendik Solum Whist [email protected] November 2008 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2008 Title: Nord Stream: Not Just a Pipeline. An analysis of the political debates in the Baltic Sea region regarding the planned gas pipeline from Russia to Germany Publication Type and Number Pages FNI Report 15/2008 79 Author ISBN Bendik Solum Whist 978-82-7613-546-6-print version 978-82-7613-547-3-online version Project ISSN 1504-9744 Abstract This report is an analysis of the planned gas pipeline from Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea known as Nord Stream. Although not yet realised, the project has, since its birth, been the subject of harsh criticism and opposition by a significant number of states that consider themselves affected by the pipeline. Whereas the Baltic States and Poland have interpreted the pipeline as a political- ly motivated strategy that will increase Russia’s leverage on them and threaten their energy security, the debate in Sweden was at first mostly concerned with the prospect of increased Russian military presence in the Swedish Exclusive Economic Zone. The potential environmental impact of the pipeline has been, and continues to be, an overarching concern shared by all the littoral states of the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Ned Brosjyre Om Prosessanlegget På Kollsnes
    FAKTA Kollsnes prosessanlegg Som en oase lyser prosessanlegget opp kystlandskapet en sensommerkveld Kollsnesanlegget spiller en nøkkelrolle når det gjelder transport av gass i store mengder fra felt i norsk del av Nordsjøen til kunder i Europa. Gass fra Kollsnes utgjør nærmere 40 prosent av totale norske gass- leveranser. De enorme gassmengdene i Troll-feltet var starten på det hele. Kollsnes prosessanlegg er i dag et Selve prosessanlegget består i hovedsak Troll er selve hjørne- senter for behandling av gass fra feltene av tre duggpunktsanlegg for behand- steinen i norsk gass- Troll, Fram, Visund og Kvitebjørn. På ling av henholdsvis gass, kondensat og Kollsnes blir gassen renset, tørket og monoetylenglykol (MEG). I tillegg finnes produksjon. Da feltet komprimert før den sendes som tørrgass et eget anlegg for utvinning av flytende gjennom eksportrør til Europa. I tillegg våtgass (Natural Gas Liquids -NGL). ble erklært drivverdig i transporteres noe gass i eget rør til I anlegget blir våtgass (NGL) først Naturgassparken, vest i Øygarden, der skilt ut. Deretter blir tørrgass trykket 1983, kom spørsmålet Gasnor behandler og distribuerer gass opp ved hjelp av de seks eksport- om hvilken vei de til innenlands forbruk. Kondensat, eller kompressorene og sendt ut i transport- våtgass, som er tyngre komponenter i systemet via eksportrør-ledningene enorme gassmengdene gassen, føres via Stureterminalen i rør Zeepipe IIA og IIB. til Mongstad (Vestprosess). Her videre- skulle ta for å komme behandles produktet og fraksjoneres til trygt fram til brukerne. propan, butan og nafta. Løsningen ble et mottaksanlegg på Kollsnes i Øygarden kommune nordvest 40% Gass fra Kollsnes utgjør nærmere for Bergen.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Delivery to Europe
    Oil and gas delivery to Europe An Overview of Existing and Planned Infrastructures GOUVERNANCE EUROPÉENNE ET GÉOPOLITIQUE DE L’ÉNERGIE 4 bis Susanne NIES l es é tud es The French Institute for International Relations (Ifri) is France’s premier centre for independent research, information, and debates on today’s most important international issues. Founded in 1979 by Thierry de Montbrial, Ifri is an officially recognized organization (1901 law). It is not beholden to any administrative authority, independently chooses its projects, and regularly publishes its works. Ifri brings together, through studies and debates and in an interdisciplinary manner, political and economic decision-makers, researchers and experts from the global level. With its Brussels branch (Ifri Brussels), Ifri is one of the rare French think-tanks that is at the heart of European debates. * Site Int 1 © Ifri Contents ABSTRACT ......................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 5 I. THE CONSTRUCTION OF GAS AND OIL INFRASTRUCTURES IN EUROPE11 Summary.................................................................................................11 1. From the Discovery of Resources to the Construction of Separate East-West Networks .......................12 2. Developing Infrastructures in the Soviet Block, and their Extension to Western Europe .............................................16 3. Conclusion: Continuity and Ruptures.............................................19
    [Show full text]
  • CO2 As Injection Gas for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) from Fields In
    NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics __________________________________ CO2 as Injection Gas for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Estimation of the Potential on the Norwegian Continental Shelf by Odd Magne Mathiassen Chief Reservoir Engineer Norwegian Petroleum Directorate Trondheim / Stavanger, May 2003 ________________________________ Part I of II CO2 injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery 2 ___________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Ole Torsæter at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology for excellent guiding and help in my work with this thesis. I would also like to thank my employer, the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, for giving me the opportunity and time to complete the thesis. My thanks also go to my colleagues Mr. Gunnar Einang, Mr. Søren Davidsen and Mr. Jan Bygdevoll for valuable discussions while working with this thesis. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Eric Lindeberg and senior researcher Idar Akervoll at the Sintef Research for valuable information on CO2 related issues. SUMMARY The main objective of this thesis is to investigate the possibility of using CO2 as injection gas for enhanced oil recovery and estimate the potential of additional oil recovery from mature oil fields on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). Because of the lack of CO2 data from offshore oil fields, a literature study on CO2 flood experience worldwide was undertaken. In addition, the physical properties of CO2 and CO2 as a solvent have been studied. The literature study makes it possible to conclude that CO2 has been an excellent solvent for enhanced oil recovery from onshore oil fields, especially in the USA and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Statoil Gas Seminar
    Creating value in times of low commodity prices Statoil gas seminar, 18 February 2016, London Jens Økland, EVP, Marketing, Midstream & Processing (MMP) Classification: Internal 2012-10-24 Our industry is in a challenging situation • Low oil and gas prices Commodity prices 140 120 Climate 100 80 • High costs 60 USD/boe 40 20 0 • Oil and gas in a 2013 2014 2015 2016 Oil Gas (NBP) decarbonising world Costs 2 Sources: Platts, Heren, IHS Statoil’s mid- and downstream business is adding value • With low commodity prices, the relative MMP1) - adjusted earnings2) importance of our mid- and downstream activity increases 25 20 • Through Asset Backed Trading, the value of our products can be increased 15 10 Billion NOK • MMP earnings in 2015 exceeds NOK 20 5 billion and accounts for nearly 30% of Statoil’s adjusted earnings 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 MMP 1) Marketing, Midstream & Processing (MMP). Before 2015: Marketing, Processing and Renewables (MPR) 2) Before tax 3 Source: Statoil Asset Backed Trading – an extensive toolbox for value creation • Our most successful trading activities imply Adjusted earnings 1) MMP - 2015 use of physical infrastructure or contractual assets − Storages − Refineries − Terminals − Shipping − Rail − Capacity bookings • Active use of assets add flexibility and optionality to our portfolio and increase our Natural gas Europe Natural gas US competitiveness Liquids Other 1) Before tax 4 Source: Statoil Resetting costs in MMP Continue efforts to become more competitive A sustained culture of continuous improvement Respond to
    [Show full text]