DOCSLIB.ORG

Whole Day Download the Hansard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whole Day Download the Hansard Friday Volume 642 15 June 2018 No. 154 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 15 June 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1193 15 JUNE 2018 MentalHealthUnits(UseofForce)Bill 1194 (9) The Secretary of State must publish the report as soon House of Commons as practicable upon the conclusion of the proceedings or investigation.”—(Mr Reed.) Brought up, and read the First time. Friday 15 June 2018 9.35 am The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Mr Steve Reed (Croydon North) (Lab/Co-op): I beg PRAYERS to move, That the clause be read a Second time. Mr Speaker: With this it will be convenient to discuss [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] the following: 9.34 am New clause 2—Independent investigation of deaths: legal aid— Mr Steve Reed (Croydon North) (Lab/Co-op): I beg ‘(1) Schedule 1 to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment to move, That the House sit in private. of Offenders Act 2012 (civil legal services) is amended as follows. Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 163), and (2) After paragraph 41 (inquests) insert— negatived. “41A Investigation of deaths resulting from use of force Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Bill in mental health units (1) Civil legal services provided to an individual in relation to Consideration of Bill, as amended in the Public Bill an investigation under section (independent investigations of Committee deaths) of the Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act 2018 (independent investigation of deaths) into the death of a member New Clause 1 of the individual’s family. (2) For the purposes of this paragraph an individual is a INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF DEATHS member of another individual’s family if— “(1) A registered manager must within seven days of becoming (a) they are relatives (whether of the full blood or half aware of a death to which this section applies notify the blood or by marriage or civil partnership), Secretary of State in writing of that death. (b) they are cohabitants (as defined in Part 4 of the Family (2) This section applies to a death if— Law Act 1996), or (a) the death occurred during, or as a result of, the use of (c) one has parental responsibility for the other.” force on the deceased patient, and Amendment 86, in clause 1, page 1, line 13, leave out (b) the use of force occurred at a mental health unit sub-paragraph (ii). managed by the registered manager. Amendment 87, page 1, line 15, leave out subsection (4). (3) On being notified of a death, the Secretary of State must appoint an independent person— Amendment 44, page 2, line 3, leave out “force” and (a) to investigate the circumstances of the death, and insert “restraint”. (b) to prepare a report regarding that death. Amendment 40, page 2, line 4, after “use” insert “or threat ”. (4) A person appointed under this section must be independent of the NHS and of private providers of mental This amendment, together with Amendments 41 to 43, would health services. extend the definition of the use of force for the provisions in the Bill to cover threats of the use of force and coercion. (5) A person appointed under this section must provide a report within three months of that appointment. Amendment 88, page 2, line 4, leave out “mechanical (6) The Secretary of State must within 14 days of receiving the or chemical” and insert “or mechanical”. report publish— Amendment 89, page 2, line 5, leave out paragraph (b). (a) the report, or Amendment 41, page 2, line 5, after “isolation” insert (b) a statement that a report under this section has been “or threat of isolation”. received. See explanatory statement for Amendment 40. (7) The Secretary of State may only publish a statement under Amendment 42, page 2, line 5, at end insert “or subsection (6)(b) if satisfied that the publication of the report would be contrary to the public interest, which includes causing (c) the coercion of a patient.” prejudice to— See explanatory statement for Amendment 40. (a) any potential or ongoing court proceedings, Amendment 90, page 2, leave out lines 14 and 15. (b) the conduct of a senior coroner’s investigation under Part 1 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Amendment 91, page 2, leave out lines 16 and 17. (8) A statement published under subsection (6)(b) must Amendment 43, page 2, line 17, at end insert— include— ““Coercion” means the use or threat of force, with the (a) the name and date of birth of the deceased, intention of causing fear, alarm or distress to control a patient’s behaviour or elicit compliance (b) the date and place of the death, with the application of a use of force.” (c) the place at which the use of force occurred, if different See explanatory statement for Amendment 40. from the place of the death, Amendment 92, in clause 2, page 2, line 20, leave out (d) the identity of the registered manager in relation to the mental health unit, and “a relevant” and insert “any”. (e) how the publication of the report would, in the opinion Amendment 93, page 2, line 23, leave out “relevant”. of the Secretary of State,be contrary to the public interest. Amendment 94, page 2, line 25, leave out “relevant”. 1195 MentalHealthUnits(UseofForce)Bill15 JUNE 2018 MentalHealthUnits(UseofForce)Bill 1196 Amendment 45, page 2, line 30, clause 3, leave out ‘(1A) The Secretary of State must publish quality standards “force” and insert “restraint”. for training provided under subsection (1). Amendment 95, page 2, line 32, leave out “relevant”. (1B) The Secretary of State may delegate the publication of quality standards for training under subsection (2).” Amendment 37, page 3, line 2, at end insert— This amendment would require training on the use of force to ‘(6A) A policy published under this section must set out that comply with quality standards. the use of force will only be used without the sole intention of inflicting pain, suffering or humiliation, or subjecting patients to Amendment 98, page 4, line 6, after “patients” insert tortuous, inhumane or degrading treatment, or without inflicting “and their families”. punishment or intimidation.” Amendment 9, page 4, line 9, leave out paragraph (c). This amendment would prevent the use of force with the sole Amendment 49, page 4, line 11, leave out “force” and intention of causing suffering or harm to a patient, in line with the insert “restraint”. Mental Health Act code of practice and the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Amendment 50, page 4, line 12, leave out “force” and Treatment or Punishment. insert “restraint”. Amendment 36, page 3, line 3, leave out from “out” Amendment 80, page 4, line 13, at beginning insert to end of line 4 and insert— “trauma-informed care, including” “(a) a description of each of the methods of restraint that This amendment, together with Amendment 81, would ensure that may be used in the mental health unit; training requirements for staff include training on trauma-informed (b) what steps will be taken to reduce and minimise the use care. of force in the mental health unit by staff who work Amendment 81, page 4, line 14, at end insert in the unit; “and the impact of the use of force on a patient who may have (c) a description of the techniques to be used for avoiding experienced violence and abuse.” or reducing the use of force in the mental health unit by staff who work in the unit; and See explanatory statement for Amendment 80. (d) a commitment to reducing the overall use of force in Amendment 51, page 4, line 15, leave out “force” and the mental health unit.” insert “restraint”. This amendment would require mental health units to commit to Amendment 52, page 4, line 16, leave out “force” and reducing the overall use of force, and increase transparency about insert “restraint”. how they intend to achieve this and what types of force they permit. Amendment 99, page 4, line 18, leave out “the principal”. Amendment 46, page 3, line 4, leave out “force” and Amendment 10, page 4, line 18, leave out “or ethical”. insert “restraint”. Amendment 53, page 4, line 18, leave out “force” and Amendment 47, in clause 4, page 3, line 7, leave out insert “restraint”. “force” and insert “restraint”. Amendment 11, page 4, line 18, at end insert— Amendment 38, page 3, line 8, at end insert— “(l) the roles, responsibilities and procedure in the event of ‘(1A) Information under subsection (1) must include a police involvement,” patient’s right to advocacy and how to access an advocate.” Amendment 12, page 4, line 18, at end insert— This amendment would ensure that people’s legal rights to “(m) awareness of acute behavioural disturbance.” advocacy, under existing provisions, are communicated to them in relation to the use of force. Government amendment 4, page 4, line 30, leave out Government amendment 1, page 3, line 16, at end “meets the standards of” and insert insert— “is of an equivalent standard to” “unless the patient (where paragraph (a) applies) or the other This is a small drafting change that clarifies that training does not person (where paragraph (b) applies) refuses the information.” need to be provided under Clause 5 if training that was recently provided was of an equivalent standard to the training provided This allows for cases where a person refuses the information under that Clause.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Independent Review of Deaths and Serious Incidents in Police Custody
    Report of the Independent Review of Deaths and Serious Incidents in Police Custody Rt. Hon. Dame Elish Angiolini DBE QC January 2017 Contents Acknowledgments 5 Executive Summary 7 Background 7 Key findings 7 Guarding the Vulnerable 14 1. Introduction 21 Background 21 Terms of Reference 22 Families 23 Previous reports 23 Other Ongoing Reviews and Action 24 The Legal Framework 25 Trends in deaths in police custody and suicides following police custody 26 Summary 28 2. Restraint 31 Introduction 31 Mental Health and restraint 33 Positional asphyxia 35 Training 36 Length of prone restraint 37 Excited Delirium/Acute Behavioural Disturbance 38 Struggle and restraint 40 The safety officer approach 41 Alternatives to manual force 42 Transportation in police vehicles 45 Recording of police use of force 46 3. Intoxication 51 Introduction 51 Observation regimes 51 ‘Drying out’ Centres 55 Denial of healthcare to intoxicated detainees 57 Alcohol withdrawal 59 Training on intoxication 59 4. Mental Health 63 Introduction 63 Modern policing and mental health 67 The inappropriateness of police custody 68 | 1 Mental health training 69 Removing mentally ill people from the policing context 70 Arresting for criminal offences rather than section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 71 Detention under section 136 in the police station as a ‘place of safety’ 72 Liaison and Diversion Schemes 75 Avoiding detention under section 136 Mental Health Act 1983 76 Use of police officers to conduct restraint within mental health detention settings 77 5. Ethnicity 83 Introduction 83 Race and the investigative process 85 Stereotypical assumptions 87 Statistics on ethnicity 89 Accountability 91 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Masks: the Big Question Iron-Age Murder Mystery
    thevictorybugle Masks: The Big Question JULY 2020 ISSUE IX RUBY, YEAR 9—CURRENT AFFAIRS REPORTER For promotions and contributions: HOW WOULD THE PUBLIC Victorybugle REACT TO WEARING MASKS @ormistonvictoryacademy.co.uk IN PUBLIC BEING MADE COMPULSORY? The Bugle’s Statement: 1) The contemplation of safety. Our commitment to an B) The contemplation of respect. inclusive, entertaining and C) The contemplation of the environment. informative newsletter is what Also yes the 1,B&C was intentional. drives the contributors of this and do whatever they can get away with. publication. If you have any 1) Would it be safer to wear a mask as a Through this lockdown, have you seen comments or suggestions, groups of people doing activities together compulsory rule, or is social distancing contact us and we’ll address enough? who obviously aren’t from the same household? These people still have to get you issues as quickly as we can. We can only publish if you Logistically, yes, it would be safer but essential items, who’s to say they wouldn’t carry on with a careless attitude? politically, no, as the number of daily cases is still going down with the correct amount of C) The environment would suffer with the Follow us people doing what they’re doing. @victoryacad sudden amount of waste. Paper masks are a one-use product. B) Would people actually obey this as a rule and try to enter places anyway? Too many questions I know, enjoy the Personally, I would say yes, people will try potential sleep deprivation. Iron-Age Murder Mystery CITY’S FINAL FIXTURES MAISIE, YEAR 9—ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTER On the 11th of July, the skeleton of an iron age man was Norwich City v discovered in Buckinghamshire, near London.
    [Show full text]
  • INQUEST Evidence Submission to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on “Systemic Racism, Violations Of
    INQUEST evidence submission to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights report on “systemic racism, violations of international human rights law against Africans and people of African descent by law enforcement agencies, especially those incidents that resulted in the death of George Floyd and other Africans and people of African descent, to contribute to accountability and redress for victims” December 2020 Introduction 1. INQUEST Charitable Trust is an independent non-governmental organisation which provides expertise on state-related deaths and their investigation to bereaved people, lawyers, advice and support agencies, the media and parliamentarians. Our policy, parliamentary, campaigning and media work is grounded in the day to day experience of working with bereaved people. 2. Our specialist casework with bereaved families focuses on deaths in police and prison custody, immigration detention, mental health settings and deaths involving multi- agency failings or where wider issues of state and corporate accountability are in question, such as Hillsborough and the Grenfell Tower fire. INQUEST works primarily in England and Wales, and advises on a small number of cases in Scotland. We have also shared our expertise on the investigation of state related deaths and the treatment of bereaved people at an international level. 3. Over the past 40 years, INQUEST has advised and assisted countless bereaved families, including many families bereaved by deaths in contact with the police. As a result, we have a unique overview of the investigatory processes, the treatment of bereaved people and the issues arising from these deaths. We have worked consistently to strengthen the institutional framework for accountability for deaths in all forms of state detention and how this works in pursuit of goals of truth, justice and accountability for bereaved families.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-04-25 Conducting Effective Voir Dire on Issues of Race Handouts
    CLE SEMINAR Conducting Effective Voir Dire on Issues of Race Hosted at: Federal Public Defender's Office Speaker: Kyana Givens, AFPD from the Western District of Washington Portland, Oregon Live on April 25, 2018 12:00pm to 1:00pm Eugene, Oregon Via video conference on April 25, 2018 12:00pm to 1:00pm Medford, Oregon Via video conference on April 25, 2018 12:00pm to 1:00pm Bias in Blue: Instructing Jurors to Consider the Testimony of Police Officer Witnesses with Caution Vida B. Johnson* Abstract Jurors in criminal trials are instructed by the judge that they are to treat the testimony of a police officer just like the testimony of any other witness. Fact-finders are told that they should not give police officer testimony greater or lesser weight than any other witness they will hear from at trial. Jurors are to accept that police are no more believable or less believable than anyone else. Jury instructions regarding police officer testimony stand in contrast to the instructions given to jurors when a witness with a legally recognized interest in the outcome of the case has testified. In cases where witnesses have received financial assistance or plea deals for their testimony, a special instruction is given. For example, when a witness with a cooperation agreement testifies, the trial court will tell the jury that while the witness has the same obligation to tell the truth as other witnesses, the jury can consider whether the witness has an interest different from other types of witnesses and that her testimony should be considered with caution.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Systems for Handling Police Complaints in Thailand
    AN EVALUATION OF THE SYSTEMS FOR HANDLING POLICE COMPLAINTS IN THAILAND by DHIYATHAD PRATEEPPORNNARONG A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY College of Arts and Law School of Law University of Birmingham February 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis, based on empirical evidence and documentary analysis, critically evaluates the systems under the regulatory oversight of the Royal Thai Police (RTP), the Office of the Ombudsman, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the National Anti- Corruption Commission (NACC) in respect of the handling of police complaints. Comparisons will be drawn from the system under the control of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) in England and Wales in order to provide alternative perspectives to the Thai police complaints system. This thesis proposes a civilian control model of a police complaints system as a key reform measure to instill public confidence in the handling of complaints in Thailand. Additional measures ranging from sufficient power and resources, complainants‘ involvement, securing transparency and maintaining police faith in the system are also recommended to enhance the proposed system.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence from INQUEST (RHR0024)
    Written evidence from INQUEST (RHR0024) Background 1. INQUEST is the only charity providing expertise on state related deaths and their investigation.1 We welcome this inquiry which resonates with our longstanding work on deaths of Black people in custody and detention and other deaths raising concerns about racism and human rights abuses. This is an important human rights issue that concerns racism and discrimination with repercussions to the right to life and the duty of the state to protect life.2 2. Whilst this submission focuses on our work alongside families following deaths in custody and detention, institutional racism and systemic neglect is endemic across society. Whether it is the racial and health inequalities that has seen the devastation of deaths from COVID-19 disproportionately impacting Black and Asian communities, or the preventable and forewarned fire at Grenfell Tower that demonstrates where profit was pursued over safety – both point to the important intersectionality of race and class which underpins many deaths engaging issues of state and corporate accountability3. 3. INQUEST’s evidence draws from our involvement, alongside bereaved families, in many reports and reviews that address directly or indirectly issues of racism, in areas of detention and health specified by the Committee’s terms of reference. Importantly, some have recognised structural and institutional racism (often informed by those with lived experience or by the families of those who have died).4 4. Many of the cases INQUEST has worked on have presented a disturbing picture of violence, racism and inhumane attitudes towards people in distress; ascribing stereotypical characteristics of extraordinary strength, dangerousness and criminality to Black people.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Inside Out' 660.Pdf
    Miscarriages of JusticeUK (MOJUK) 22 Berners St, Birmingham B19 2DR to ask him/herself whether the sentencing court could conclude that the circumstances appli - Tele: 0121- 507 0844 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mojuk.org.uk cable when the sentence as passed had changed as a result of knowing failures by the assist - ing offender to give assistance in accordance with the assisting offender agreement?” MOJUK: Newsletter ‘Inside Out’ No 660 (02/11/2017) - Cost £1 Delivering the unanimous judgment of the Court, Lord Kerr stated “it is unquestionably true that in a number of instances, the judge found that the Stewarts had not been truthful”. Lord Supreme Court: DPP Correct in Deciding Not to Resentence Dishonest Witnesses Kerr found that the Court could not uphold the High Court’s view that “the predominant factor Seosamh Gráinséir for Irish Legal News: The UK Supreme Court has allowed an appeal by in deciding where the interests of justice lay was whether a change in circumstances had the Director of Public Prosecutions against the finding of the High Court in Northern Ireland occurred between those which obtained at the time that the agreement with the specified pros - that the DPP’s decision not to remit dishonest witnesses for re-sentencing was contrary to the ecutor was made and the time at which consideration of whether to refer the case back to the interests of justice. Overturning the High Court's finding that the matter of sentencing should original sentencing court took place”. be remitted to the DPP for a fresh decision, Lord Brian Kerr was satisfied that the DPP con - Section 74(3) imposes no explicit constraint on how the specified prosecutor should approach ducted “a careful, perfectly legitimate investigation of the question of the interests of justice” the question of the interests of justice and it was Lord Kerr’s opinion that there was “no warrant and that her decision could not be impeached.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 0.99
    Thursday Volume 663 25 July 2019 No. 337 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 25 July 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1415 25 JULY 2019 1416 Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP): The Minister House of Commons might be toasting the new Prime Minister, but I do wonder how much hot air is being generated and what contribution that will make to the net emissions target. Thursday 25 July 2019 The Scottish Government have committed to net zero by 2045, rather than the UK Government’s 2050 target. The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Is the UK not willing to match that level of ambition? PRAYERS Mr Goodwill: When it comes to hot air, pots and kettles spring to mind. I look forward to working with the Scottish [MR SPEAKER ] in the Chair Administration to achieve the target. This is not a party political issue. Every single part of this House wants to take action on climate change, and it is vital that we do Oral Answers to Questions so to deliver a cleaner and greener planet in the future. Colin Clark (Gordon) (Con): This is perfect weather ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS for barbecues and enjoying Scottish beef. Does the Minister agree that the beef industry is doing its bit to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from burping cows? The Secretary of State was asked— Climate Change Adaptation Mr Goodwill: Methane is a very potent greenhouse gas, but it is interesting to note that, unlike carbon 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dying for Justice
    Dying forJustice Edited by Harmit Athwal and Jenny Bourne Dying for Justice Edited by Harmit Athwal and Jenny Bourne Institute of Race Relations Notes and acknowledgements Chapters 1-5 have been written by Harmit Athwal, Jenny Bourne and Frances Webber. Other sections have been written by the authors indicated on each piece. Numerous individual families and their campaigns have, over the years, provided the inspiration and impetus for this report and the IRR’s onging work on the issue. We are also indebted to a host of volunteers, too many to name, who have helped us over the years. But we owe a special debt to Betsy Barkas, Ann Dryden, Trevor Hemmings and Mike Higgs. All pictures are copyright of IRR News unless otherwise specified. Cover: Vigil for Mikey Powell in September 2012. (© Ken Fero/Migrant Media) Pages 42-43: Top row, left-to-right Marcia Rigg and Stephanie Lightfoot-Bennett at a demonstration outside the CPS in August 2014. United Families and Friends annual remembrance procession in October 2013. Middle row, left-to-right Demonstration outside Yarl's Wood removal centre following death of Manuel Bravo in 2005. Demonstration outside Yarl's Wood removal centre following death of Manuel Bravo in 2005. Demonstration outside Harmondsworth removal centre in 2006. Adrienne Makenda Kambana, with Deborah Coles (INQUEST) and friends outside Isleworth Crown Court at the end of the inquest into the death of Jimmy Mubenga in 2013. Birthday vigil for Habib ‘Paps' Ullah in High Wycombe in December 2014. Bottom row, left-to-right Stafford Scott at a demonstration outside the offices of the IPCC in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 639 24 April 2018 No. 126 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 24 April 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 713 24 APRIL 2018 714 Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab): Thousands of House of Commons key court staff were axed, but the Government are now spending tens of millions of pounds more on contracting agency staff. More than 100 courts were sold off, each Tuesday 24 April 2018 raising not much more than the average house price. Now the Secretary of State has appointed someone The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock with a slash-and-burn record as the new chair of the HMCTS board, telling the press that Tim Parker’s PRAYERS “expertise will be vital as we deliver our reform and modernisation of the courts”. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] To allay concerns that Mr Parker has been appointed for his toughness on cuts, can the Minister outline the specific expertise that Mr Parker has in working in our Oral Answers to Questions court system? Lucy Frazer: The hon. Gentleman makes a number of points that I would like to refute, but I will mainly JUSTICE concentrate on two. It is important that where successful people in business put themselves forward for public The Secretary of State was asked— service, we should welcome them and not put off Court Closures experienced people from taking up important posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Enduring Injustice: the Persistence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S
    ENDURING INJUSTICE: THE PERSISTENCE OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN THE U.S. DEATH PENALTY DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER MAY 28, 2010, 8:45 P.M. Racism, shmacism. Get a rope and let’s go hang us one. Anonymous comment on news story about Andrew Ramseur’s capital case, www.statesville.com (Statesville Record & Landmark) ENDURINGTHE PERSISTENCE OF RACIAL INJUSTICE DISCRIMINATION IN THE U.S. DEATH PENALTY A Report By The Death Penalty Information Center Principal Author: Ngozi Ndulue Edited by Robert Dunham September 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 27 Race Still Matters: The Continuing Role of Race in the Modern Death Penalty 2 Race and the Death Penalty Through U.S. History 28 Modern Capital Punishment Trends: Declining Use but Continuing Disparities 3 Capital Punishment in the Colonial and 33 Race Matters at Every Stage of Antebellum Period a Capital Case 5 Death in the Shadow of the Lynch Mob 37 Arrest and Homicide Clearance Rates 7 Mass Violence and Community Terror 37 Prosecutorial Charging 10 Anti-Lynching Campaigns 39 Jury Selection 12 Capital Punishment as an Acceptable 39 Death Qualification Alternative to Lynchings 40 Peremptory Strikes 14 Similarities Between Public Spectacle 43 The Impact of Non-Diverse Juries Lynchings and Public Executions 43 Defense Counsel 16 Race and Executions Between the 46 Sentencing and the Determination Lynching Era and the Civil Rights Era of “Deathworthiness” 18 Beginning the Modern Era: Race 48 Wrongful Convictions and Challenges at the U.S. Supreme Court Exonerations 22 Beyond Black and White: Race, 51 The Aftermath of McCleskey: Are Race Ethnicity, Sovereignty and the History Challenges Doomed in the Modern Era? of the Death Penalty 53 The Death Penalty in the Era of the New Jim Crow and Black Lives Matter 23 The Death Penalty, Native American Sovereignty, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • George Floyd
    Volume 97 Number 43 | JUNE 10-16, 2020 | MiamiTimesOnline.com | Ninety-Three Cents “Floyd was someone who also had a beautiful soul. If he was told he would have to sacrifice his life to bring the world together, I know he would've did it." RODNEY FLOYD Younger brother of George Floyd George Floyd is laid to rest amid criminal justice reform PENNY DICKERSON, Managing Editor lean frame and a mural hung on a stage [email protected] behind the casket that depicted the Chris- tian street evangelist wearing a black cap Black man’s body is laid to rest in a casket. Four ex-police officers are in custody. Pro- against a backdrop of white angel wings. testors world-wide have been subjected to curfews and a voluminous call for ‘change’ The symbolic homegoing was described persists. The alliterative aftermath of George Floyd’s death on May 25 has altered the as being dignified and attended by states- A men, celebrities and civil rights leaders. humanitarian fabric that monitors everyone’s pulse. Floyd’s last breath also tempered racial conflicts that have heightened since Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. first dreamed. SEE FLOYD 4A Floyd’s funeral was held Tuesday in a her 6’4” ‘gentle giant’ into the world and private service in Houston, where he was served as his final outcry for raised. His final burial was in Houston help before he took his last Memorial Gardens cemetery in suburban breath. Pearland next to his mother — Larcenia His coffin was gold, a brown Floyd — who brought suit was fitted to clothe his Today BUSINESS................
    [Show full text]