DOCSLIB.ORG

History 325: Russia from Its Origins to the Great Reforms Fall 2015 ______Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History 325: Russia from Its Origins to the Great Reforms Fall 2015 ______Dr History 325: Russia from its Origins to the Great Reforms Fall 2015 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Dr. McCaffray Office: Morton 234 [email protected] Phone: 962-7542 Office hours: MW 12:30-4:30* and by appointment at other times *Once per month Dept. meeting on Monday at 3:30 will end office hours early: check with me! Although the series of states called “Russian” have straddled the man-made border between Europe and Asia, all of these states have been rooted in the Christian, which is to say predominantly European, world. Thus being Russian is one of the many ways of being European, but since boundaries cause debate, many Russians and Europeans debate about this. We can join the debate and have some fun with it, but we are not going to settle it. Nonetheless, Russia is unique, just like every other country. Particular material and cultural characteristics, anchored in time, have made Russian civilization distinctive. The course of Russia’s history proceeded within the context of a harsh climate, sparse population, distance from the great Atlantic sea-routes, a particular relationship between the church and the state’ and extremely insecure national boundaries. Around the time of the founding of the Jamestown and Massachusetts Bay colonies in North America, the Russian social system was hardening into a unique combination of autocratic absolutism, serfdom, and noble privilege. In History 325 we will examine closely the relationship between rulers who eventually learned to create a strong state on this borderless plain and the people they ruled, who eventually learned how to accommodate, manipulate, and, sometimes, to escape their rulers. Course Goals: In this course I hope you will: Master significant details and interpretations of Russia's pre-20th c. history Practice interpreting primary sources Develop a habit of wondering about and articulating significant questions Improve your ability to read complex non-fiction Improve your ability to write about books and ideas Become a clearer thinker Contemplate the impact of history and geography on values and institutions Ponder the relationship between luck and virtue in the history of nations Departmental Learning objectives This course is meant to contribute to the ability of History majors to achieve these things by the time they graduate: frame historical questions employ a broad range of sources in research demonstrate awareness of interpretive differences evaluate and analyze source material write clearly and effectively develop an interpretation based on evidence grasp relevant historical facts and contexts communicate orally Learn more about History Department Student Learning Outcomes here: http://www.uncw.edu/hst/majors/learninggoals.html Graded work: Class discussions (4 @ 50 pts. each) 200 points Map Assignment 50 Mid-term Exam 150 Paper on Rude & Barbarous (5 pages) 100 Paper on Ransel (5 pages) 200 Paper on Gogol 100 Final Exam 200 1000 Grade scale: 900-1000: A; 800-899: B; 700-799: C; and so on. I will assign +/- grades at the end of the semester, splitting each per centile into thirds (e.g.: 800-832 = B-; 833-865= B; 866-899= B+). Policies and suggestions: Because our classroom is small and the door is at the front of the room I have realized (reluctantly) the need to lock the door once class starts. Please do not try to enter after it is closed. If you plan to use a laptop computer in the classroom make sure that you do not use it for any purpose other than taking notes for this class because other students may be distracted. If I observe other students being distracted by your computer I will ask you not to bring the laptop to class anymore. Please don’t text in class. It makes me feel left out. Please don’t bring out any electronic device at all during the exams. I keep a record of attendance only for listed discussion days, and I will distribute the practices for grading discussions Nonetheless, I must recommend regular attendance; it seems to help with both learning and with your final grade Because this is an upper-level class, I assume you are familiar with what constitutes plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty; a full description of plagiarism and other important policies is available here: http://www.uncw.edu/odos/documents/cosl-current.pdf I will not accept late work UNLESS you have discussed this with me in advance. If you do that, I probably will, probably with a point reduction. Under no circumstance will I accept any work after the last day of classes Having whined about all of that let me assure you that if you would like to come by my office and talk about history, the Russians, or your future educational plans, I would love to see you. If my office hours are not convenient just email me for a better time. I always try to be available at the advertised times, but if you know for sure you are coming by on a certain day feel free to verify that I will be there. Books required and available for purchase at UNCW Bookstore and Seahawk Books or elsewhere: James Cracraft, ed., Major Problems in the History of Imperial Russia (Heath, 1994) ISBN 0-669-21497-3 or 978-0669214970 Lloyd Berry & Robert Crummey, eds., Rude and Barbarous Kingdom (Wisconsin, 1968) 978-0299047641 David Ransel, A Russian Merchant’s Tale (Indiana, 2009) 978-0-253-22020-2 Nikolai Gogol, The Inspector General (any edition ok; Dover Thrift: 978-0-486- 28500-9) A copy of this textbook: Catherine Evtuhov, et al. A History of Russia: Peoples, Legends, Events, Forces is on reserve in the Library if you would like to use it when you get confused; it is also a good source of maps and suggested readings: Class Topics and Schedule of Assignments PART I ESTABLISHING A STATE IN EURASIA Week One Introduction Read: Syllabus; “The Arrival of the Vikings in Rus’” from the Russian Primary Chronicle (http://community.dur.ac.uk/a.k.harrington/Russhist.HTML) Aug. 19 The envelope of Russian history Aug. 21 The Rus’ and their neighbors Week Two The rise and fall of Kievan Rus’ Read: Cracraft, Chapter 1 (“Historical Overviews”) “The Christianization of Russia” from the RPC (http://community.dur.ac.uk/a.k.harrington/Russhist.HTML) Aug. 24 Prince Vladimir adopts Christianity Aug. 26 Princes and Fratricide Aug. 28*** The Coming of the Mongols Map Assignment due Week Three The Mongols and the Rise of Muscovy Read: Berry, “Two Early Voyages” (Chancellor and Jenkinson) Aug. 31*** DISCUSSION NO. 1: What was the legacy of Kiev and the Mongols? Sept. 2 What does it take to make a state? Sept. 4 Neighbors and rivals: Lithuania and Poland Week Four The Russian state: to be or not to be Read: Berry, “A Diplomatic Mission” (Randolph and Turberville) Sept. 7 LABOR DAY: NO CLASS Sept. 9 The rocky fifteenth century Sept. 11 Monks and pioneers Week Five The reign of Ivan IV, a.k.a., the Terrible Read: Berry, Giles Fletcher (start) Sept. 14 The life and times of Ivan IV Sept. 16 War, expansion, crisis Sept. 18 Being a woman in Muscovite Russia Week Six Collapse: The Time of Troubles Read: Berry, Giles Fletcher (finish) Sept. 21 Dynastic crisis and foreign invasion Sept. 23 Popular monarchism/popular rebellion Sept. 25 The rise of serfdom Week Seven The cruel seventeenth century Read: Cracraft, Chapter 2 (The Muscovite Heritage) Sept. 28 Schism in the Orthodox Church Sept. 30 Cossacks, Ukraine, rebels Oct. 2*** DISCUSSION NO. 2: Ivan and the Englishmen Paper Due Week Eight The Age of Peter the Great Read: Cracraft, Chapter 3 (The Era of Peter the Great) Oct. 5 Peter and Sophia Oct. 7 Military persistence and government reform Oct. 9 Cultural revolution Week Nine: Court, Capital and Palace Read: Cracraft, Ch. 4 (From Peter to Catherine) Oct. 12 FALL BREAK: NO CLASS Oct. 14 Anna, Elizabeth and Peter III Oct. 16*** Mid-term Exam PART 2 CONSOLIDATING AND CHALLENGING THE STATE Week Ten Catherine the Greatest? Read: Cracraft, Ch. 5 (The Age of Catherine) and Documents pp. 249- 252 (Russia annexes Crimea); Start Ransel, A Russian Merchant’s Tale Oct. 19 The Enlightened Empress Oct. 21 Imperial Expansion Oct. 23 Commerce Week Eleven The Age of Revolution Read: A Russian Merchant’s Tale Oct. 26*** DISSCUSSION NO. 3 Was Russia modern in 1796? Oct. 28 Alexander I and the French Revolution Oct. 30 Urban life, urban monarchy Week Twelve Russia at the dawn of the nineteenth century Read: Finish Ransel, A Russian Merchant’s Tale Nov. 2 Being a noble Nov. 4 Being a serf Nov. 6*** Adam Smith in Russia PAPER ON RANSEL DUE Week Thirteen Russia’s Napoleonic Wars Read: Cracraft, Ch. 7 (Apogee of Empire) Nov. 9 Between Britain and France Nov. 11 The real war of 1812 Nov. 13 Decembrist Rebellion Week Fourteen The Apogee of Russian Monarchy Read: Nikolai Gogol, The Inspector General Nov. 16 Debating Emancipation Nov. 18 Eastern Question and Crimean War Nov. 20 The Tsar Liberator Week Fifteen Reform Read: Start Cracraft, Ch. 8 (Emancipation and the Great Reforms) Nov. 23*** Paper on Gogol due Nov. 25-7 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY: NO CLASS Week Sixteen Consequences Read: Finish Cracraft, Ch. 8 Nov. 30 The Great Reforms and the death of the Reformer Dec. 2*** DISCUSSION NO. 4 on monarchy and emancipation .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eurr 4203/5203 and Hist 4603/5603 Imperial and Soviet Russia Wed 8:35-11:25, Dunton Tower 1006
    Eurr 4203/5203 and Hist 4603/5603 Imperial and Soviet Russia Wed 8:35-11:25, Dunton Tower 1006 Dr. Johannes Remy Winter 2014 Office: 3314 River Building e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Wednesday 3:00-4:00p.m. Phone: To be announced This course will analyze fundamental political, social, and cultural changes across the lands of the Russian Empire and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This seminar course will focus on major topics in the history and historiography of the Russian Empire and Soviet Union. Themes to be explored include political culture, empire and nationality questions, socialism, revolution, terror, class and gender. In the Napoleonic wars, Russia gained greater international prestige and influence than it had ever before. However, it was evident for many educated Russians that their country was “backward” compared to the Western Europe in its social and political system and economic performance. Russia retained serfdom longer than any other European country, until 1861, and the citizens gained representative bodies with legislative prerogatives only in 1905-1906, after all the other European countries except the Ottoman Empire. Many educated people lost their trust in the government and adopted radical, leftist and revolutionary ideologies. Even after the abolition of serfdom, the relations between peasants and noble landowners contained elements of antagonism. Industrialization began in the 1880s and brought additional problems, since radical intelligentsia managed to establish connections with discontented workers. In the course of the nineteenth century, the traditional policy of co-operation with local elites of ethnic minorities was challenged by both Russian and minority nationalisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. the Tsar and Empire: Representation of the Monarchy and Symbolic Integration in Imperial Russia $
    12. The Tsar and Empire: Representation of the Monarchy and Symbolic Integration in Imperial Russia $ ymbolic representation played a central role in defi ning the concept of S monarchical sovereignty in Russia. In the absence of native traditions of supreme power, Russian tsars invoked and emulated foreign images of rule to elevate themselves and the state elite above the subject population. Th e source of sacrality was distant from Russia, whether it was located beyond the sea whence the original Viking princes came, according to the tale of the invitations of the Varangians, or fi xed in an image of Byzantium, France, or Germany.1 Th e centrality of conquest in the representations of Russian rulers contrasts with the mythical history of the Hapsburg emperors, which legitimized the expansion of imperial dominion through marriage.2 From the fi fteenth century, when Ivan III refused the title of king from the Holy Roman Emperor with the declaration that he “had never wanted to be made king by anyone,” Russian monarchs affi rmed and reaffi rmed the imperial character of their rule, evoking the images of Byzantine and later Roman and European imperial dominion. Beginning with Ivan IV’s conquests of Kazan and Astrakhan, they 1 On the symbolic force of foreignness see Ju. M. Lotman and B. A. Uspenskii, “Th e Role of Dual Models in the Dynamics of Russian Culture (Up to the End of the Eighteenth Century),” in Ju. M. Lotman and B. A. Uspenskii, Th e Semiotics of Russian Culture, ed. Ann Shukman (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Contributions, 1984), 3-35.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Russia (To About 1970)
    A Short History of Russia (to about 1970) Foreword. ...............................................................................3 Chapter 1. Early History of the Slavs, 2,000 BC - AD 800. ..........4 Chapter 2. The Vikings in Russia.............................................6 Chapter 3. The Adoption of Greek Christianity: The Era of Kievan Civilisation. ..........................................................7 Chapter 4. The Tatars: The Golden Horde: The Rise of Moscow: Ivan the Great. .....................................................9 Chapter 5. The Cossacks: The Ukraine: Siberia. ...................... 11 Chapter 6. The 16th and 17th Centuries: Ivan the Terrible: The Romanoffs: Wars with Poland. .............................. 13 Chapter 7. Westernisation: Peter the Great: Elizabeth.............. 15 Chapter 8. Catherine the Great............................................. 17 Chapter 9. Foreign Affairs in the 18th Century: The Partition of Poland. .............................................................. 18 Chapter 10. The Napoleonic Wars. .......................................... 20 Chapter 11. The First Part of the 19th Century: Serfdom and Autocracy: Turkey and Britain: The Crimean War: The Polish Rebellion................................................... 22 Chapter 12. The Reforms of Alexander II: Political Movements: Marxism. ........................................................... 25 Chapter 13. Asia and the Far East (the 19th Century) ................ 28 Chapter 14. Pan-Slavism.......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Russia to 1855 Monday / Wednesday / Friday 3:30-4:30 Old Main 002 Instructor: Dr
    HIST 294-04 Fall 2015 History of Russia to 1855 Monday / Wednesday / Friday 3:30-4:30 Old Main 002 Instructor: Dr. Julia Fein E-mail: j [email protected] Office: Old Main 300, x6665 Office hours: Open drop-in on Thursdays, 1-3, and by appointment COURSE DESCRIPTION Dear historians, Welcome to the first millennium of Russian history! We have a lively semester in front of us, full of famous, infamous, and utterly unknown people: from Ivan the Terrible, to Catherine the Great, to the serfs of Petrovskoe estate in the 19th century. Most of our readings will be primary documents from medieval, early modern, and 19th-century Russian history, supplemented with scholarly articles and book sections to provoke discussion about the diversity of possible narratives to be told about Russian history—or any history. We will also examine accounts of archaeological digs, historical maps, visual portrayals of Russia’s non-Slavic populations, coins from the 16th and 17th centuries, and lots of painting and music. As you can tell from our Moodle site, we will be encountering a lot of Russian art that was made after the period with which this course concludes. Isn’t this anachronistic? One of our course objectives deals with constructions of Russian history within R ussian history. We will discuss this issue most explicitly when reading Vasily Kliuchevsky on Peter the Great’s early life, and the first 1 HIST 294-04 Fall 2015 part of Nikolai Karamzin’s M emoir , but looking at 19th- and 20th-century artistic portrayals of medieval and early modern Russian history throughout also allows us to conclude the course with the question: why are painters and composers between 1856 and 1917 so intensely interested in particular moments of Russia’s past? What are the meanings of medieval and early modern Russian history to Russians in the 19th and 20th centuries? The second part of this course sequence—Revolutionary Russia and the Soviet Union—picks up this thread in spring semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberiaâ•Žs First Nations
    TITLE: SIBERIA'S FIRST NATIONS AUTHOR: GAIL A. FONDAHL, University of Northern British Columbia THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE VIII PROGRAM 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION:1 CONTRACTOR: Dartmouth College PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Gail A. Fondahl COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER: 808-28 DATE: March 29, 1995 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law. 1 The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended). The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author(s). CONTENTS Executive Summary i Siberia's First Nations 1 The Peoples of the
    [Show full text]
  • Scandinavian Influence in Kievan Rus
    Katie Lane HST 499 Spring 2005 VIKINGS IN THE EAST: SCANDINAVIAN INFLUENCE IN KIEVAN RUS The Vikings, referred to as Varangians in Eastern Europe, were known throughout Europe as traders and raiders, and perhaps the creators or instigators of the first organized Russian state: Kievan Rus. It is the intention of this paper to explore the evidence of the Viking or Varangian presence in Kievan Rus, more specifically the areas that are now the Ukraine and Western Russia. There is not an argument over whether the Vikings were present in the region, but rather over the effect their presence had on the native Slavic people and their government. This paper will explore and explain the research of several scholars, who generally ascribe to one of the rival Norman and Anti- Norman Theories, as well as looking at the evidence that appears in the Russian Primary Chronicle, some of the laws in place in the eleventh century, and two of the Icelandic Sagas that take place in modern Russia. The state of Kievan Rus was the dominant political entity in the modern country the Ukraine and western Russia beginning in the tenth century and lasting until Ivan IV's death in 1584.1 The region "extended from Novgorod on the Volkhov River southward across the divide where the Volga, the West Dvina, and the Dnieper Rivers all had their origins, and down the Dnieper just past Kiev."2 It was during this period that the Slavs of the region converted to Christianity, under the ruler Vladimir in 988 C.E.3 The princes that ruled Kievan Rus collected tribute from the Slavic people in the form of local products, which were then traded in the foreign markets, as Janet Martin explains: "The Lane/ 2 fur, wax, and honey that the princes collected from the Slav tribes had limited domestic use.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching of History of 19Th Century Russia in the Visegrád Group Countries
    European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2017, 6(2) Copyright © 2017 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. All rights reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic European Journal of Contemporary Education ISSN 2304-9650 E-ISSN 2305-6746 2017, 6(2): 341-351 DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2017.2.341 www.ejournal1.com WARNING! Article copyright. Copying, reproduction, distribution, republication (in whole or in part), or otherwise commercial use of the violation of the author(s) rights will be pursued on the basis of Russian and international legislation. Using the hyperlinks to the article is not considered a violation of copyright. The History of Education Teaching of History of 19th century Russia in the Visegrád Group Countries Miroslav Kmeť a , a Matej Bel University, Slovakia Abstract The study focuses on the content and extent of teaching of Russian history, or history of Russian culture and civilization, in the teaching of history in the states of the Visegrád Group (i.e. in Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia). In each of these states, the subject of history (sometimes in different names) has a different status, time subsidy, and content in the framework programs. The study therefore examines the extent to which content and performance standards – concerning the history of Russia in the 19th century – are set out in state educational programs (plans) and their presentation in selected secondary school textbooks. The author comes to the conclusion that the history textbooks in the states of Visegrád Group reflect the basic facts of Russian history of the 19th century, but it is evident that since the 1990s, more and more facts from general history have gradually disappeared in favour of national history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch 1: Russia's Historical Roots
    1 Russia’s Historical Roots Russia’s thousand-year history is replete with colorful leaders, global and continental wars, and the dramatic juxtaposition of brilliant culture with extreme brutality and poverty. Some Westerners find these qualities at- tractive, others repelling—there is little middle ground in how foreigners respond to Russia. This chapter outlines some of the enduring legacies of Russia’s political and economic organization and conveys Russia’s perspective on both its global and regional position and its identity. For the last 500 years, Russia has been one of the traditional European powers,1 with an inheritance both rich and complicated: Many of the peculiarities of tsarist Russia— some pertaining to geography, others to tradition—persist today; similarly, the Soviet period of 1917–91 is over, but it too has left indelible marks. Over the past two centuries, occasional tsarist and even Soviet leaders have struggled to free Russia from the “path dependencies” of its central- ized and authoritarian economic and political systems and its deeply ter- ritorial sense of security, which has fueled expansion and the domination of its neighbors. In addition to these challenges, the Russian reformers who came to power in 1991 strived to join the West but succeeded only partially. The Muscovite, Tsarist, and Soviet Legacies Looking at a map of the world, one cannot help but be impressed by the sheer vastness of Russia. From the beginning of the 16th century through 1. This point has been made most strongly by Martin Malia, Russia under Western Eyes (Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Russian Empire: Imperial Russia, 1689-1917 Spring 2016 Professor Peter Holquist
    1 History 048: The Rise and Fall of the Russian Empire: Imperial Russia, 1689-1917 Spring 2016 Professor Peter Holquist ( [email protected] ) Office: College Hall 208-D Office hours: Mondays, 12-1:30PM; and by appointment In the mid-seventeenth century, Muscovite Russia was one of many mid-tier states in Europe struggling to survive, having just experienced political implosion and foreign occupation—Polish forces sat in the Moscow Kremlin—during the Time of Troubles (1604- 1613). By the mid-eighteenth century, Russia had become a vast empire and had emerged as one of the great powers of Europe. Down to 1917, the Russian Empire continued to play a precocious role in Europe’s—and the world’s—military, political, and cultural developments. How and why did Russia become the center of the world’s largest land empire? What was the cost of the Russian empire’s “greatness,” both to its own population and to other peoples? Why did so many Russians have doubts about their country’s path and so obsess about their relationship to Europe? What constants determined this trajectory—and what has changed in Russian culture and society? The only prerequisites for this course are a curiosity for Russian history and a willingness to explore its drama and complexity. No prior knowledge of the subject is assumed. Russian history, like any history, is multifaceted and complex. No account can cover all its nuances and variety. This course will focus in particular on Russia’s growth as an empire, in political and diplomatic terms; on the consolidation of the autocracy that accompanied this growth; and, the responses of Russians to these two developments.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of RUSSIA All Risplits Resejt'ed
    HANDBOUND AT THE UNlVtRSITY OF Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/historyofrussia01kliu :iS^7 1 A HISTORY OF RUSSIA All risplits reseJT'ed. 1 ^ :^ A // HISTORY ^/RUSSIA BY V. O. KLUCHEVSKY LATE PROFESSOR OF RUSSIAN HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MOSCOW TRANSLATED BY C. J. HOGARTH ^^^'^' X K\/pc, pycCKOM iicrQ^i^m(j:u>aKuiii<^oi VOLUME ONE LONDON: J. M. DENT ^ SONS, LTD. NEW YORK: E. P. BUTTON ^ CO. 191 DK Ho Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson &• Co. At the Ballantyne Press, Edinburgh — -V CONTENTS CHAPTER I PAGE The two points of view in the study of history— The principal factor in the development of Russian social life —The iour principal periods of Russian history —The Ancient Chronicle ; its genesis, authorship, and contents . I CHAPTER n Historical value of the Ancient Chronicle— Its importance for later Russian historians—A chronological error—The origin of that error—The work of compiling the Chronicle—Defects in the older versions—The theory of Slavonic unity—Manuscripts of the twelfth century—The divergent points of view of their authors 19 CHAPTER III Principal factors of the first period of Russian history —The two theories as toils starling-point—The races who inhabited Southern Russia before the coming of the Eastern Slavs—The Ancient Chronicle's tradition concerning the dispersal of the Slavs from the Danube—Jornandes on their distribution during the sixth century—The military union of the Eastern Slavs in the Carpathians—The period and peculiar features of their settlement of the Russian plain— Results of that settlement ......
    [Show full text]
  • Native & Indigenous Communities in Siberia
    Native & Indigenous Communities in Siberia: Beginnings to 1917 Like the United States, Russia’s population is incredibly diverse. People practice a variety of religions including Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism. In absolute numbers, Russia takes in the largest number of immigrants of any country after the United States and Germany. More than 120 languages are spoken in Russia, and many of these languages are indigenous languages. While there are indigenous people all over Russia, the majority of Russia’s indigenous communities live in Siberia, the The bright green part of the map is the part of Russia located in Asia, east of the Ural Mountains. This part of Russia is called Siberia. part of Russia that sits in Asia. Many indigenous groups in Siberia were nomads. In the 13th century, the Mongol Empire conquered part of Siberia, and indigenous communities under Mongolian rule had to pay the Mongols a kind of tax called a tribute. These tributes could be furs, goods, or services. The Mongol Empire stretched all the way to the European part of Russia. By the beginning of the 15th century, the empire began to lose power and other groups took over various territories. One of those groups was the Muscovy, which would eventually become the Tsardom of Muscovy, and then the Russian Empire. In the 16th and 17th centuries, forces from the Tsardom of Muscovy fought other groups which had conquered land from the Mongols in Siberia. The Tsardom wanted land and the people’s tributes. These fights became known as the Russian conquest of Siberia. By 1639, ethnic Russians reached the Pacific Ocean and by 1640, the Tsardom included all of northern Asia, or Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus in the Second Half of the Sixteenth Century: Imperial Entanglements and Shifting Loyalties
    The North Caucasus in the Second Half of the Sixteenth Century: Imperial Entanglements and Shifting Loyalties by Murat Yasar A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto © Murat Yasar 2011 The North Caucasus in the Second Half of the Sixteenth Century: Imperial Entanglements and Shifting Loyalties Murat Yasar Doctor of Philosophy Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto 2011 Abstract The present dissertation seeks to present and analyze the hitherto poorly understood first encounter between the Ottoman Empire and the Tsardom of Muscovy in the North Caucasus from the Muscovites’ annexation of the nearby Khanate of Astrakhan in 1556 and subsequent penetration into this region, to their expulsion from it by the Ottomans in 1605. The study relies on both Ottoman and Muscovite sources, both documentary and narrative, as well as archival and published. The main archival documentary sources are the Ottoman mühimme defters (registers of orders issued by the Imperial Council [Divan-i Hümayun]) and the Muscovite posol’skie knigi (registers of diplomatic documentation, including ambassadorial reports, diplomatic correspondence, and other documents administered by the Ambassadorial Office [Posol’skii Prikaz]). The main narrative sources are sixteenth-century Ottoman and Muscovite chronicles. On the basis of the Ottoman and Muscovite documentary sources it is possible to determine what Ottoman and Muscovite policies in the North Caucasus were, to what degree they were well- formulated, and how they evolved during the aforementioned time period. It becomes clear that ii Ottoman and Muscovite policies in the Pontic-Caspian steppes and specifically in the North Caucasus had some superficial similarities, but were in essence fundamentally different.
    [Show full text]