DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rise and Fall of Rome & the Rise of Chris6anity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Rise and Fall of Rome & the Rise of Chris4anity World History GPS • SSWH3 Examine the polical, philosophical, and cultural interac2on of Classical Mediterranean socie2es from 700 BCE/BC to 400 CE/AD. • 3a. Compare the origins and structure of the Greek polis, the Roman Republic, and the Roman Empire. • 3b. Idenfy the ideas and impact of important individuals, include: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, and Augustus Caesar. • 3c. Analyze the impact of Greek and Roman culture, polics, and technology. Parallel Events (Greece vs. Rome) • Ancient Greek Events • Ancient Rome Events • 490-479 BC: Persian • 509 BC: Rome sets up a Wars Republic • 460 BC: Age of Pericles in • 450 BC: 12 Tables of Law Athens • 270 BC: Rome controls • 431 BC: Peloponnesian most of Italian peninsula Wars • 264-146 BC: Punic Wars • 331 BC: Alexander the vs. Carthage Great conquers Persian • 133 BC: Roman power Empire: Hellenis4c Age extends from Spain to • 133 BC: end of Greek Egypt dominance in Med. world Rome: Beginnings • Geography: Rome was built on 7 hills along Tiber River; located at center of Mediterranean Sea & west of central Apennine Mts. (midway between Alps & Italian Peninsula’s southern 4p) • Defensible locaon & accessible for trade & transportaon Rome: Beginnings • Lans: ancestors of the Romans – Herders and farmers: se[led along the Tiber River along the 7 hills • Etruscans: ruled central and northern Italy – Came from Asia Minor(Eastern Mediterranean) – Called themselves Tyrrhenians in honor of their king • Romans borrowed Etruscan alphabet, arch and worshipped similar gods/goddesses • Greeks: se[led in southern Italy/Sicily Rome: Beginnings • -Legend has it that twin brothers, Romulus and Remus founded the city aer being raised by a wolf. • -According to the tale, the twins’ mother was a Lan woman and their father was the war god Mars. • -This led Romans to believe that they had a divine origin. Rome: The Republic • Romans drove out Etruscan rulers around 509 BC • Set up a Republic (govt. of the people) • Senate: most powerful governing body made up of 300 patricians (landholding upper class): served for life Checking for Understanding • How did geography affect the development of Rome? • A republic is a democrac form of government in which people elect their leaders to make laws for them. How is this different from the democracy prac4ced by the Greeks in Athens? Rome: The Republic • Patricians: wealthy • Plebeians: common landowners (held most of farmers, ar4sans, the power) merchants (most of the • Inherited power and populaon) social status • Ci4zens with vo4ng rights • Claimed authority to • Not allowed to hold govt. make laws came through posions ancestry • Eventually allowed to form an assembly & elect representaves called tribunes to protect them from unfair acts of patrician officials Rome: Government under The Republic • Execu4ve: Assembly elected 2 consuls for one-year terms; commanded the army & directed the government; could not be re-elected for 10 years; each had veto power over the other • Legislave: Senate– 300 members (mostly patrician); controlled foreign/domes4c policy; Tribal Assembly– made laws for plebeians & elected tribunes • Judicial:8 Praetors oversee courts & govern provinces • In 4mes of crisis (like war), a dictator was chosen with absolute power to make laws & command the army for 6 months. The Roman Republic • 450 BC: 12 Tables of Law set up in the Forum --- made it possible for plebeians to appeal decision of a judge The Roman Army • All landowning ci4zens required to serve • 10 years military service was required to serve in public office. • Divided into legions (about 5000 men) and centuries (about 80 men) Roman Conquests & Wars • Conquered most of Italy by 265 B.C. • 1st Punic War against Carthage: 264-241 B.C. Rome won control of Sicily & W. Med. • 2nd Punic War: 218-202 B.C. Nearly defeated by Hannibal but Scipio outsmarted him • 3rd Punic War: 149-146 B.C. Carthage destroyed • A^er Punic Wars, Rome dominated W. Med. then conquered E. Med. • Romans controlled from Anatolia in the east to Spain in the west by 70 B.C. End of the Roman Republic • Economic Problems: Wealthy landowners ran large estates/farms using slaves; many small farmers couldn’t compete, sold their farms, became poor, homeless or jobless, moved to cies • Gracchus Brothers (tribunes) proposed reforms like limi4ng estate size & giving land to the poor but wealthy senators had them assassinated. End of the Roman Republic • Military Problems: Some generals seized power by offering land to the poor who would fight for them & were no longer loyal to the Republic • This situaon allowed military leaders, supported by their own troop, to take power by force Checking for Understanding • What was the difference in the patricians and plebeians? • In what ways was the government under the Roman Republic similar to our government? • Why was it important that the 12 Tables were wri[en down and displayed in public? Julius Caesar • He became consul in 59 B.C. & formed a triumvirate with Pompey & Crassus who helped him get elected. • Strong leader & military genius • Conquered Gaul (France) in 50 B.C. & appointed himself governor Julius Caesar cont. • Caesar popularity made him dangerous so the Senate ordered his army to disband in 50 B.C. • 49 B.C.-Caesar defies the Senate & crosses Rubicon R. • 46 B.C. Caesar returns to Rome aer defeang Pompey’s army & named dictator • 44 B.C. Caesar named dictator for life • 44 B.C. killed by Senators who were afraid of losing power to him Reforms of Julius Caesar • Granted Roman ci4zenship to people in the provinces • Expanded the Senate to include other regions • Created jobs for the poor through public building projects • Started colonies so people without land could own property • Increased pay for soldiers Beginning of the Roman Empire • 2nd Triumvirate: Octavian (Caesar’s grandnephew), Lepidus, Mark Antony controlled Rome aer Caesar’s death • 27 B.C.:Octavian turned against the other two, defeated them and named himself emperor (supreme commander) & Augustus (“exalted one” • Pax Romana (Roman Peace) period between 27 B.C. to 180 A.D. of peace/prosperity in the Roman Empire The Roman Empire • Government: civil services such as tax collec4on & postal service maintained stability ; Senate s4ll func4oned to make laws • Agriculture & trade: 90% of people engaged in farming; common coinage made trade easier; Rome traded in the Med., China, & India • Roman roads first built for the military helped trade and the spread of Roman culture Checking for Understanding • What do you think was the main difference between the Roman Republic & the Roman Empire? Life in the Roman Empire • Rich: had country & city homes; only rich could hold office (no pay); homes had running water/ baths; emphasized educaon(children had tutors at home or sent to boarding schools. • Poor: most lived in the country; Nearly 1 million Romans lived in crowded apartment buildings with constant danger of fire; government offered free food/entertainment to avoid rebellion Entertainment in the Roman Empire • Romans of all classes enjoyed circus, chariot races • Held in Circus Maximus—racetrack could hold 250,000 spectators • Also liked theater, mimes, jugglers, dancers, acrobats, clowns • Romans enjoyed spectacles in amphitheaters • Wild animals baled each other and professional fighters • Gladiator contests most popular, performed in Colosseum for 50,000 people • Roman baths were places for hygiene & socializing. (Baths had steam rooms, mee4ng rooms, pools) Entertainment in the Roman Empire A Roman Bath The Colosseum Life in the Roman Empire • Head of family—paterfamilias, • Upper class Romans placed great family father—oldest living male value on educaon • Had extensive powers over other • Parents taught children at home; members of family wealthy families hired tutors or • Within family structure, virtues of sent sons to exclusive schools to simplicity, religious devo4on, learn Lan, Greek, law, math, obedience emphasized public speaking • Adop4on important in Roman • Romans adopted much from society, a way to ensure family Greek mythology, also from name would be carried on Egyp4ans, others • Women could do li[le without • Each family worshipped local interven4on of male guardian, household gods, penates more freedom in lower classes • Many worshipped emperor Slavery in the Roman Empire • Slavery was significant to Roman life and economy • Probably more slavery than any previous civilizaon (as much as 1/3 of the populaon • Most slaves were conquered peoples (men, women, & children) • Slaves were property to be bought, sold, punished, freed, or put to death. • Strong male slaves were o^en forced to become gladiators or professional fighters who fought to the death in public arenas Good & Bad Emperors Bad Good • Caligula: 37-41 A.D. • Nerva: 96-98 custom of mentally disturbed adop4ng heir • Trajan: 98-117 empire at • Nero: 54-68 vicious, largest; building programs; murderer, persecuted social welfare Chris4ans • Hadrian:117-138 consolidated conquests; reorganized • Domi4an: 81-96 bureaucracy dictator; feared treason • Marcus Aurelius 161-180 everywhere & executed height of economic prosperity; many under suspicion defeated invaders; philosopher Mul4ple Causes: Fall of the Roman Empire Polical Social Economic Military • Poli4cal office a • Decline in • Poor harvests • Threat from n. burden, not interest in public • Invaders European tribes reward affairs disrupted trade • Low funds for • Military • Low confidence • No war plunder defense
Recommended publications
  • Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images

    Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images

    GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF ROYAL ARMS, NAMES AND IMAGES 1 The following booklet summarises the legal position governing the use, for commercial purposes, of the Royal Arms, Royal Devices, Emblems and Titles and of photographs, portraits, engravings, effigies and busts of The Queen and Members of the Royal Family. Guidance on advertising in which reference is made to a Member of the Royal Family, and on the use of images of Members of the Royal Family on articles for sale, is also provided. The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance when it is unclear as to whether the use of “Arms” etc., may give the impression that there is a Royal connection. 2 TRADE MARKS Section 4 (1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states: “A trade mark which consists of or contains – (a) the Royal arms, or any of the principal armorial bearings of the Royal arms, or any insignia or device so nearly resembling the Royal arms or any such armorial bearing as to be likely to be mistaken for them or it, (b) a representation of the Royal crown or any of the Royal flags, (c) a representation of Her Majesty or any Member of the Royal Family, or any colourable imitation thereof, or (d) words, letters or devices likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has or recently has had Royal patronage or authorisation, shall not be registered unless it appears to the registrar that consent has been given by or on behalf of Her Majesty or, as the case may be, the relevant Member of the Royal Family.” The Lord Chamberlain's Office is empowered to grant the consent referred to in Section 4(1) on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.
  • Sample Intercessions for Atonement & Healing

    Sample Intercessions for Atonement & Healing

    Diocese of Scranton Sample Intercessions for Atonement & Healing From the Federation of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions and the Diocese of Scranton Office for Parish Life It is recommended to include at least one of these intercessions in the Universal Prayer each weekend. 1. For the victims of abuse at the hands of some members of the clergy, may they find healing, support, and peace within the Catholic community, we pray to the Lord. 2. For the families of abuse victims, that their compassionate concern may affect healing and that their strong advocacy may bring about change within the Church and society, we pray to the Lord. 3. For Pope Francis, for the bishops of the United States, and all the bishops of the world, that they may heed the promptings of the Holy Spirit and work to promote justice for all victims of sexual abuse, we pray to the Lord. 4. That those terrorized by sexual abuse, especially those abused by priests of our Diocese, may find the courage to come forward to authorities and find the peace and consolation they need, we pray to the Lord. 5. That the Church may be a safe refuge for all in need, especially those who suffer physical, mental and sexual abuse, we pray to the Lord. 6. That all members of the Church may commit themselves to protect children and the most vulnerable in our communities, we pray to the Lord. 7. For all those in parishes and dioceses who are responsible for safe environment training programs which promote the protection of children, we pray to the Lord.
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire

    Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire

    HUNNIC WARFARE IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES C.E.: ARCHERY AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Laura E. Fyfe 2016 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire Laura E. Fyfe The Huns are one of the most misunderstood and mythologized barbarian invaders encountered by the Roman Empire. They were described by their contemporaries as savage nomadic warriors with superior archery skills, and it is this image that has been written into the history of the fall of the Western Roman Empire and influenced studies of Late Antiquity through countless generations of scholarship. This study examines evidence of Hunnic archery, questions the acceptance and significance of the “Hunnic archer” image, and situates Hunnic archery within the context of the fall of the Western Roman Empire. To achieve a more accurate picture of the importance of archery in Hunnic warfare and society, this study undertakes a mortuary analysis of burial sites associated with the Huns in Europe, a tactical and logistical study of mounted archery and Late Roman and Hunnic military engagements, and an analysis of the primary and secondary literature. Keywords: Archer, Archery, Army, Arrow, Barbarian, Bow, Burial Assemblages, Byzantine, Collapse, Composite Bow, Frontier, Hun, Logistics, Migration Period, Roman, Roman Empire, Tactics, Weapons Graves ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr.
  • Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Lombards the Ostrogoths, Visigo

    Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Lombards the Ostrogoths, Visigo

    Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Lombards 149 CHAPTER THREE THE SUccEssOR STATES IN THE WEST: OsTROGOTHS, VISIGOTHS, AND LOMBARDS The Ostrogoths, Visigoths and Lombards all took shape as peoples in the Roman frontier region of the middle and lower Danube. In their early years, they might also be described as Roman client or even field armies, since they were often in Roman service, large segments of these people stayed loyal to the East Roman Empire, and there was at times little to distinguish them from other field armies in the Balkans that took to arms against the central government during the 5th and 6th centuries. They should there- fore be treated together as products of the Balkans military culture, but due to their inability to find satisfactory settlement in the East, they mi- grated into the chaotic West where they finally established the indepen- dent kingdoms with which we are familiar. The survey of East Roman developments in the previous chapter will show that there was more to unite the Mediterranean than to divide it, and that patterns of military organization could change at a similar pace throughout the former Roman world. 3.1 The Ostrogoths, 493-554 Theoderic’s Ostrogothic kingdom lasted only two generations, from 493 to 554, but during its heyday, it was the most successful and thoroughly Ro- manized of all the successor states. There is a general consensus that an- cient social structures, such as a high degree of urbanization and a complex economic system, survived very well during this period. The Ostrogoths absorbed surviving Roman administrative structures and collaborated closely with the Roman senatorial class.
  • A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through

    A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through

    Letter Geochemical Perspectives Letters the history of the western world. Carthage was a colony founded next to modern Tunis in the 8th century BC by Phoenician merchants. During the 3rd century BC its empire expanded westward into southern Spain and Sardinia, two major silver producers of the West Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Rome’s grip had tight- © 2016 European Association of Geochemistry ened over the central and southern Italian peninsula. The Punic Wars marked the beginning of Rome’s imperial expansion and ended the time of Carthage. A glimpse into the Roman finances The First Punic War (264 BC–241 BC), conducted by a network of alliances in Sicily, ended up with Rome prevailing over Carthage. A consequence of this of the Second Punic War conflict was the Mercenary War (240 BC–237 BC) between Carthage and its through silver isotopes unpaid mercenaries, which Rome helped to quell, again at great cost to Carthage. Hostilities between the two cities resumed in 219 BC when Hannibal seized the F. Albarède1,2*, J. Blichert-Toft1,2, M. Rivoal1, P. Telouk1 Spanish city of Saguntum, a Roman ally. At the outbreak of the Second Punic War, Hannibal crossed the Alps into the Po plain and inflicted devastating mili- tary defeats on the Roman legions in a quick sequence of major battles, the Trebia (December 218 BC), Lake Trasimene (June 217 BC), and Cannae (August 216 BC). As a measure of the extent of the disaster, it was claimed that more than 100,000 Abstract doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1613 Roman soldiers and Italian allies lost their lives in these three battles, including The defeat of Hannibal’s armies at the culmination of the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 three consuls.
  • The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The

    The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. The Development of Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrarchs to the Herakleian Dynasty General Introduction The emperor, as head of state, was the most important and powerful individual in the land; his official portraits and to a lesser extent those of the empress were depicted throughout the realm. His image occurred most frequently on small items issued by government officials such as coins, market weights, seals, imperial standards, medallions displayed beside new consuls, and even on the inkwells of public officials. As a sign of their loyalty, his portrait sometimes appeared on the patches sown on his supporters’ garments, embossed on their shields and armour or even embellishing their jewelry. Among more expensive forms of art, the emperor’s portrait appeared in illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and wall paintings such as murals and donor portraits. Several types of statues bore his likeness, including those worshiped as part of the imperial cult, examples erected by public 1 officials, and individual or family groupings placed in buildings, gardens and even harbours at the emperor’s personal expense.
  • A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 8 Article 4 2001 A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Magness, Jodi (2001) "A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite?," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol8/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Near EasTern EThnic ElemenT Among The ETruscan EliTe? by Jodi Magness INTRODUCTION:THEPROBLEMOFETRUSCANORIGINS 1 “Virtually all archaeologists now agree that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of the “indigenous” theory of Etruscan origins: the development of Etruscan culture has to be understood within an evolutionary sequence of social elaboration in Etruria.” 2 “The archaeological evidence now available shows no sign of any invasion, migra- Tion, or colonisaTion in The eighTh cenTury... The formaTion of ETruscan civilisaTion occurred in ITaly by a gradual process, The final sTages of which can be documenTed in The archaeo- logical record from The ninTh To The sevenTh cenTuries BC... For This reason The problem of ETruscan origins is nowadays (righTly) relegaTed To a fooTnoTe in scholarly accounTs.” 3 he origins of the Etruscans have been the subject of debate since classical antiqui- Tty. There have traditionally been three schools of thought (or “models” or “the- ories”) regarding Etruscan origins, based on a combination of textual, archaeo- logical, and linguistic evidence.4 According to the first school of thought, the Etruscans (or Tyrrhenians = Tyrsenoi, Tyrrhenoi) originated in the eastern Mediterranean.
  • THEATRE of WAR 264–241 Bc 0 200 400 Kilometres 0 100 200 Miles

    THEATRE of WAR 264–241 Bc 0 200 400 Kilometres 0 100 200 Miles

    a S e i a n h e n T y r r Liparian Lipara Isles Mylae Messana Panormus Tyndaris Cale acte Soloeis Drepanum Eryx Himers Motya Segesta Tauromenium Aegatian Naxos Isles Lilybaeum Entella Mt Etna Agyrium Mazara SICILY Selinus Enna Catane Heraclea Acragas Leontini M e d i t e r r Syracuse a n Gela Phoenician settlements e Ecnomus Acrae a n S Plemmyrium Greek settlements e a Native settlements Camerina 0 25 50 75 kilometres 0 25 50 miles Pachynus THEATRE OF WAR 264–241 BC 0 200 400 kilometres 0 100 200 miles Ticinus ILLY RICUM Ticinum DALMATIA Po Trebia Bononia Fanum Pisa Arno Ariminum Trasimeme Perusia Adriatic Sea CORSICA Cosa Tiber Alba Fucens Veii Rome Allifae Cannae Beneventum SARDINIA Pompeii Brundisium Neapolis Tarentum Tyrrh enian Sea Croton a M Se e n d i Messana ia t Rhegium on e r I r a Lilybaeum n SICILY e a n S Carthage e a Syracuse AFRICA Zama ITALY IN THE WAR WITH HANNIBAL THE EASTERN EMPIRE k S e a B l a c Artaxata Sinope GREA TER ARMENIA Heraclea PONTUS Byzantium BITHY NIA Nicomedia MA CEDONIA SOPHENE GALA TIA Halys C APP ADOCIA LYCAONIA CORDUENE Pergamon ASIA P ARTHIAN KINGDOM Tigris Athens Ephesus OSROHENE Antioch Euphrates ACH AEA CILICIA LY CIA SY RIA Seleucia RHODES CYPRUS CRETE Roman Empire M e d i t e Roman Provinces r r a n e a n S e a PALESTINE Cyrene Jerusalem Roman Protectorates Parthian Kingdom CY RENAICA Alexandria 0 200 400 kilometres EGYPT 0 100 200 miles Nile THE ROMAN EMPIRE UNDER HADRIAN n a e c O c i t n a a e l North S t Sea ic A lt York Ba BRIT AIN London Aral Sea Colonia Agrippina Rhine Mainz Danube GAUL
  • 1 Understanding Historical Change: Rome HIST 1220.R21, Summer

    1 Understanding Historical Change: Rome HIST 1220.R21, Summer

    Understanding Historical Change: Rome HIST 1220.R21, Summer 2016 Adjunct Professor Matthew Keil, PhD TWR 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM Dealy Hall 202, Rose Hill Email: [email protected] [email protected] (preferred) Web: MagisterKeil.com Office Hours by appointment in Faculty Memorial Hall , 428D Course Overview and Scope Within the ever-fractious saga of European history, ancient Rome looms unchallenged as the continent’s greatest period of unity and stability. At its zenith in the second century AD, the Roman Empire stretched from Hadrian’s Wall in Northern England to the Euphrates River in Syria, and from the Black Sea in the East to the Atlantic Ocean in the West. So tremendous in fact was the achievement of Rome in creating and sustaining this enormous empire that the very notion of Rome has left an indelible mark on all subsequent nations which are bearers of Western civilization. European rulers as far apart in time as Charlemagne, Napoleon, and Hitler have all consciously sought to position their respective dominions in relation to the Roman exemplar, and indeed the historical precedent for this positioning was first laid by the immediate successors to Rome's empire, the "barbarian" tribes who laid it waste, yet who nevertheless often called themselves Romans; after them, and for most of its subsequent history, Europe has seen some form of the Holy Roman Empire. It was not just in Europe, however, but also on the continents of Africa and Asia that Roman subjects swore their obedience to a single political system, acquiesced to the jurisprudence of a single law-code, and sought entrance into a single, distinct cultural community, despite their own often deep linguistic, religious, and regional diversity.
  • Warships of the Ancient World 3000–500 Bc

    Warships of the Ancient World 3000–500 Bc

    WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 3000–500 BC ADRIAN K. WOOD ILLUSTRATED BY GIUSEPPE RAVA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 196 WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 3000–500 BC ADRIAN K. WOOD ILLUSTRATED BY GIUSEPPE RAVA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 t Chronology BCE EGYPT 5 t Egyptian ships and seafaring t Warships of Rameses III t Tactics, organization and the battle of the Delta t Ships of the Sea Peoples MINOAN CRETE 15 t The Minoan Thalassocracy t Minoan ships t Minoan tactics BRONZE AGE SYRIA 20 t Ugarit and the Hittites t Syrian ships t Tactics and the battle of Alasiya PHOENICIA: THE LEGACY OF UGARIT 24 t Phoenician sea power t Phoenician warships t Phoenician naval practices and tactics GREECE 30 t Homeric warlords, warriors and ships t Early pentekonters t Hekatonters t Eikosoroi t Homeric tactics t Colonial wars (c. 700–500 BCE) t Late pentekonters t Triakonters t Archaic tactics and the battle of Alalia t Tyrants and sea power t Polycrates and the Samaina t The end of an era BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 t Primary Sources t Select Secondary Sources Index INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 3000–500 BC INTRODUCTION The warships which fought for mastery of the Mediterranean during the Classical period were the culmination of centuries of development. This book traces the naval innovations that culminated in the standardized warships of Greek, Carthaginian and Roman fleets. The size and general configuration of pre-Classical warships remained comparable throughout the two millennia culminating around 500 BCE.
  • Peirates, Leistai, Boukoloi, and Hostes Gentium of the Classical World : the Orp Trayal of Pirates in Literature and the Reality of Contemporary Piratical Actions

    Peirates, Leistai, Boukoloi, and Hostes Gentium of the Classical World : the Orp Trayal of Pirates in Literature and the Reality of Contemporary Piratical Actions

    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Classics Honors Projects Classics Department May 2006 Peirates, Leistai, Boukoloi, and Hostes Gentium of the Classical World : The orP trayal of Pirates in Literature and the Reality of Contemporary Piratical Actions. Aaron L. Beek Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/classics_honors Recommended Citation Beek, Aaron L., "Peirates, Leistai, Boukoloi, and Hostes Gentium of the Classical World : The orP trayal of Pirates in Literature and the Reality of Contemporary Piratical Actions." (2006). Classics Honors Projects. Paper 4. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/classics_honors/4 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Peirates, Leistai, Boukoloi, and Hostes Gentium of the Classical World: The Portrayal of Pirates in Literature and the Reality of Contemporary Piratical Actions. Aaron L. Beek Spring, 2006 Advisor: Nanette Goldman Department: Classics Defended April 18, 2006 Submitted April 24, 2006 Acknowledgements First, thanks go to Alexandra Cuffel and Nanette Goldman, for the co-overseeing of this project’s completion. The good professor, bad professor routine was surprisingly effective. Second, thanks go to Peter Weisensel and David Itzkowitz, for their help on the history portions of this paper and for listening to me talk about classical piracy far, far, far too often. Third, much blame belongs to Joseph Rife, who got me started on the subject. Nevertheless he was involved in spirit, if not in person.