Mining the Dream Factory: Thomas Hart Benton, American Artists, And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mining the Dream Factory: Thomas Hart Benton, American Artists, And 104 105 Benton also told reporters that he hoped his painting might be displayed in “some large motion picture theater,” where moviegoers could scrutinize the “combination of machine and sex that Hollywood is.”3 Benton put a lot into this project, including sketching a series of sar- donic Hollywood Notes depicting industry activities, such as story confer- ences and movie premieres (figs. 2, 3) and writing a caustic essay titled “Hollywood Journey,” both intended for an exposé on “what goes on” in the Mining the movie industry.4 But the commission with Life fell through. Benton’s candid take on “the machinery of the industry” did not segue with how the movie in- dustry expected to be seen. Nor was it compatible with how popular maga- zines like Life, which depended on motion-picture advertising income, typically depicted the movies. And it certainly did not fit the glamorous and romantic Fig. 2. Thomas Hart Benton, Director’s image of Hollywood that the industry fostered and American audiences ex- Conference, 1937. Ink and ink wash on paper. Location unknown pected to see: “the national fairytale,” observed Ruth Suckow in a 1936 arti- DreaM Factory cle, of “overnight rise to fame and material wealth, to social opulence, with Sex and Beauty in headline type.”5 Almost from its infancy in the early twentieth century, the American film thoMas hart Benton, aMerican artists, industry has been called a “dream factory”: a fabricator of fantastic moving images, an entertainment enterprise promising stardom and riches to those lucky enough to work in “the movies.”6 The “factory” part of that identity, how- anD the rise oF the Movie inDustry ever, was mostly discounted, especially by the movie industry. Downplaying the structural realities of its assembly-line operations, studio-system manage- Erika Doss ment policies, and general corporate profit profile, the movies avoided a mass-production reputation in favor of rags-to-riches fables of individual suc- cess: an American Dream of the independent upward mobility of movie stars. Success stories, like that of Theodosia Goodman, the daughter of a Cincinnati In August 1937, Thomas Hart Benton traveled to Hollywood, commissioned tailor who morphed into the exotic silent movie icon Theda Bara, or Tom Mix, by Life magazine to paint a “movie mural” illustrating how feature films were the son of a Pennsylvania stable master who became the highest paid cow- made. The artist spent much of his time at 20th Century Fox’s studios in boy actor of the 1920s, helped fuel that dream. Century City, a commercial and residential area of Los Angeles, where the Adopting certain symbolic and economic strategies, the movie industry pictures Ali Baba Goes to Town, a screwball comedy starring Eddie Cantor cultivated and controlled its dream factory image through much of the twenti- and Gypsy Rose Lee; Life Begins in College, a farce featuring the Ritz eth century. In the 1910s, for example, when many American movies were Brothers comedy team; and In Old Chicago, a big-budget musical showcas- produced in studios on the East Coast, the industry institutionalized a star ing movie stars Tyrone Power and Alice Faye were being filmed on various system of celebrity players who were avidly marketed in posters, stills, lobby lots. Based on what he described as the “several hundred drawings” that he Fig. 3. Thomas Hart Benton, Carthay Circle, cards, newspaper ads, and fan magazines, such as the industry organ 1937. Watercolor, gouache, and graphite on made during his month-long visit, Benton’s dynamic painting Hollywood paper. Private collection Photoplay, launched in 1911. During the 1920s, the industry, now centered (1937–38) is filled with the stars, supporting actors, directors, skilled techni- in Southern California, capitalized on its sweeping cultural dominance with cians, and machines of major studio production of the movie industry’s self-referential symbols and rituals, including a huge sign with fifty-foot-high Golden Age of the 1930s (fig. 1).1 by thirty-foot-wide letters that spelled out its name in the Hollywood Hills; At the center of the large horizontal canvas, which echoes the propor- red-carpet premieres with swanky celebs and mobs of fans at exotic theaters tions of a movie screen and embodies the energized collage aesthetics and like Grauman’s Chinese; a Walk of Fame featuring movie star handprints and frenetic pacing of motion pictures themselves, is a scantily dressed chorus footprints; and, beginning in 1929, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and girl auditioning for a scene in In Old Chicago. As Benton explained in a letter Sciences annual awards ceremony, where bronze “Oscars” were handed out to Daniel Longwell, the Life editor who arranged his Hollywood assignment: for movie industry “bests.” By the 1930s, the industry’s overblown opinion of its own self-importance had become the subject of a number of movies about The young lady who occupies the center of the panel is more a sym- the movies — about, especially, how stars like Theda Bara and Tom Mix were bolical than an actual movie figure. I wanted to give the idea that the born.7 machinery of the industry, cameras, carpenters, big generators, high American artists — from authors such as F. Scott Fitzgerald, Budd voltage wires etc. is directed mainly toward what young ladies have Schulberg, and Nathanael West to painters like Benton, Edward Hopper, and under their clothes. So I took the clothes off but added a few little Reginald Marsh — responded to this powerful new mode of mass communica- bits for the post office. I hope you like the picture. I do.2 tion in different ways.8 In the industry’s early years, some worked for the stu- dios designing sets, painting backdrops, and making movie posters. Many 106 107 Doss Mining the Dream Factory artists were influenced by the anarchic aesthetic of the movies, whose dy- painters, sculptors, bedbugs, and cockroaches.”11 Ingram sculpted, Benton namic and illusory visual representations assaulted “natural” or stable under- painted, and both scrambled for odd jobs in the movie industry to make a liv- standings of time, space, and storytelling. Others were drawn to the physical ing. First joining the Edison Company in the Bronx, where he wrote scenarios, settings of moviegoing: Hopper, a movie enthusiast, illustrated plush theater dressed scenes, and did some bit acting, Ingram subsequently worked for interiors in paintings such as New York Movie (1939; fig. 4). Marsh rendered Vitagraph (located in Brooklyn), then at Fox, Universal, and World studios (in movie theater facades and audiences in Paramount Picture (1934) and Fort Lee).12 He began directing his first pictures in 1916 and continued to Twenty Cent Movie (1936; fig. 5). Still other artists explicitly critiqued the sculpt and sketch while making twenty-seven movies and building a reputa- dream factory: the evidence of its structural operations, celluloid offerings, tion as an extraordinarily creative and fiercely independent cinema “artiste” and incredible fan base, as well as the celebrity lifestyles of its stars, provided who detested the corporate mind-set of the big studios. In the mid-1920s, rich fodder for these works. Benton, whose experience with the movies was Ingram left Hollywood in disgust and settled in the French Riviera, where he extensive, worked all these angles. started his own production company. He retired from the movies in the 1930s Settling in New York in the early teens, after spending several years in and spent the rest of his life sculpting. As a writer for Theatre Magazine ob- Paris studying modern art, Benton found jobs in the burgeoning movie stu- served in 1928, “Rex Ingram is one of the few motion picture directors with a Fig. 4. Edward Hopper, New York Movie, 1939. dios of Brooklyn and Bedford Park, New York, and Fort Lee, New Jersey. Like distinct cultural background, an artist’s conscience, temperament, and an am- Oil on canvas. The Museum of Modern Art, the high-tech start-ups of the 1990s in California’s Silicon Valley, the early bition that transcends the narrow limitations imposed by Hollywood’s ‘Big New York, Given anonymously, 396.1941 movie industry was innovative, collaborative, and informal, backed by risk-tak- Business.’” A decade later, Benton would grapple with similar themes in his ing entrepreneurs who sought to capitalize on cinema’s phenomenal growth painting Hollywood and in his critical essay “Hollywood Journey,” denouncing and expanding market. As film historian Ben Singer notes, nearly 5,200 fea- the movies as “an economically conditioned Art.”13 ture films and some 31,300 one-, two-, and three-reelers (each about ten to As he advanced in the early motion motion-picture industry, Ingram cre- twelve minutes long) were produced in the United States alone between ated opportunities for Benton and other artists. Benton designed sets and 1912 and 1920. Movie theaters multiplied in number and size: in 1900, New painted backdrops for Fox and Pathé studios, making seven dollars a day. He York City featured 97 nickelodeons (named for their five-cent admission fee), even did a bit of stunt work, later recalling: “One time Rex got it into his head seating from two hundred to five hundred people; by 1910, there were four that I might be made into an actor and gave me a part in a barroom scene hundred such theaters in Manhattan — and more than twenty thousand, ac- with Paddy Sullivan and Jimmy Kelly and a lot of other pugs in those days who cording to Scientific American, in the nation’s “northern cities.” During the put on the fights for the movies.” The name of Benton’s silver-screen debut 1910s, upscale “movie palaces” were built to accommodate one thousand to remains unknown, and the movie itself has no doubt disappeared — fewer than five thousand patrons for nonstop showings that began around noon and 14 percent of early silent features survive today in their original format — but continued until late at night.9 With their inventive stories, stereotypical charac- the film in question might have been Broken Fetters (1916), a “white slavery” ters, dynamic visual effects, and seemingly infinite variety — from westerns and melodrama that Ingram directed for Universal.
Recommended publications
  • BULLETIN PRESIDENT TREASURER EDITOR John Bachochin Loren Moore Mike Prero 15731 S
    BULLETIN PRESIDENT TREASURER EDITOR John Bachochin Loren Moore Mike Prero 15731 S. 4210 Rd., POB 1181 12659 Eckard Way Claremore, OK 74017 Roseville, CA 95678 Auburn,CA 95603 918-342-0710 916-783-6822 530-906-4705 No. 355 August 2014 by Mike Prero The hobby has produced a lot of covers over the last 75 years, and, perhaps not surprisingly, its share of bloopers...at the very least! To be fair, the manufacturers were responsible for most of them, but the designers had their share. In any event, we have a wide variety of offerings here—I‘ve left out all the miscuts and other production errors; these are all ‗somebody goofed‘ errors... No. 355 SIERRA-DIABLO BULLETIN-August 2014 Page 2 No. 355 SIERRA-DIABLO BULLETIN-August 2014 Page 3 In case you couldn’t find some of the errors... 1st page, 3rd cover: 7th Anniversary 2nd page, 1st cover: Schaumburg 2nd page, 2nd cover: wrong dates 2nd page, 3rd cover: Hotel 2nd page, 4th cover: congratulates 2nd page, 5th cover: Bitter 2nd page,6th cover: 1996 > 1997 2nd page, 7th cover: Congratulations 3rd page, 1st cover: it‘s > its 3rd page, 2nd cover: it‘s > its and Gouverneurs 3rd page, 3rd cover: Bob Lincoln 3rd Page, 4th cover: Heskett 3rd page, 5th cover: Cindy No. 355 SIERRA-DIABLO BULLETIN-August 2014 Page 4 Great Ships of the Seas: The Italia She began her life as the Swedish-American Line‘s Kungsholm, built in 1928. Even then,, she was a noted transatlantic liner. Later, beginning in the early thirties, she also developed a good reputation on luxury long-distance cruises.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Reality and Fantasy in the Films of Powell and Pressburger: 1939-1946
    The Representation of Reality and Fantasy In the Films of Powell and Pressburger 1939-1946 Valerie Wilson University College London PhD May 2001 ProQuest Number: U642581 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U642581 Published by ProQuest LLC(2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 The Representation of Reality and Fantasy In the Films of Powell and Pressburger: 1939-1946 This thesis will examine the films planned or made by Powell and Pressburger in this period, with these aims: to demonstrate the way the contemporary realities of wartime Britain (political, social, cultural, economic) are represented in these films, and how the realities of British history (together with information supplied by the Ministry of Information and other government ministries) form the basis of much of their propaganda. to chart the changes in the stylistic combination of realism, naturalism, expressionism and surrealism, to show that all of these films are neither purely realist nor seamless products of artifice but carefully constructed narratives which use fantasy genres (spy stories, rural myths, futuristic utopias, dreams and hallucinations) to convey their message.
    [Show full text]
  • Paintings by John W. Alexander ; Sculpture by Chester Beach
    SPECIAL EXHIBITIONS THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO, DECEMBER 12 1916 TO JANUARY 2, 1917 PAINTINGS BY JOHN W. ALEXANDER SCULPTURE BY CHESTER BEACH PAINTINGS BY CALIFORNIA ARTISTS PAINTINGS BY WILSON IRVINE PAINTINGS BY EDWARD W. REDFIELD PAINTINGS, DRAWINGS AND SKETCHES BY MAURICE STERNE 0 SPECIAL EXHIBITIONS OF WORK BY THE FOLLOWING ARTISTS PAINTINGS BY JOHN W. ALEXANDER SCULPTURE BY CHESTER BEACH PAINTINGS BY CALIFORNIA ARTISTS PAINTINGS BY WILSON IRVINE PAINTINGS BY EDWARD W. REDFIELD PAINTINGS, DRAWINGS AND SKETCHES BY MAURICE STERNE THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO DEC. 12, 1916 TO JAN. 2, 1917 PAINTINGS BY JOHN WHITE ALEXANDER OHN vV. ALEXANDER. Born, Pittsburgh, J Pennsylvania, 1856. Died, New York, May 31, 1915. Studied at the Royal Academy, Munich, and with Frank Duveneck. Societaire of Societe Nationale des Beaux Arts, Paris; Member of the International Society of Sculptors, Painters and Gravers, London; Societe Nouvelle, Paris ; Societaire of the Royal Society of Fine Arts, Brussels; President of the National Academy of Design, New York; President of the Natiomrl Academy Association; President of the National Society of Mural Painters, New York; Ex- President of the National Institute of Arts and Letters, New York; American Academy of Arts and Letters; Vice-President of the National Fine Arts Federation, Washington, D. C.; Member of the Architectural League, Fine Arts Federation and Fine Arts Society, New York; Honorary Member of the Secession Society, Munich, and of the Secession Society, Vienna; Hon- orary Member of the Royal Society of British Artists, of the American Institute of Architects and of the New York Society of Illustrators; President of the School Art League, New York; Trustee of the New York Public Library; Ex-President of the MacDowell Club, New York; Trustee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art; Trustee of the American Academy in Rome; Chevalier of the Legion of Honor, France; Honorary Degree of Master of Arts, Princeton University, 1892, and of Doctor of Literature, Princeton, 1909.
    [Show full text]
  • Papéis Normativos E Práticas Sociais
    Agnes Ayres (1898-194): Rodolfo Valentino e Agnes Ayres em “The Sheik” (1921) The Donovan Affair (1929) The Affairs of Anatol (1921) The Rubaiyat of a Scotch Highball Broken Hearted (1929) Cappy Ricks (1921) (1918) Bye, Bye, Buddy (1929) Too Much Speed (1921) Their Godson (1918) Into the Night (1928) The Love Special (1921) Sweets of the Sour (1918) The Lady of Victories (1928) Forbidden Fruit (1921) Coals for the Fire (1918) Eve's Love Letters (1927) The Furnace (1920) Their Anniversary Feast (1918) The Son of the Sheik (1926) Held by the Enemy (1920) A Four Cornered Triangle (1918) Morals for Men (1925) Go and Get It (1920) Seeking an Oversoul (1918) The Awful Truth (1925) The Inner Voice (1920) A Little Ouija Work (1918) Her Market Value (1925) A Modern Salome (1920) The Purple Dress (1918) Tomorrow's Love (1925) The Ghost of a Chance (1919) His Wife's Hero (1917) Worldly Goods (1924) Sacred Silence (1919) His Wife Got All the Credit (1917) The Story Without a Name (1924) The Gamblers (1919) He Had to Camouflage (1917) Detained (1924) In Honor's Web (1919) Paging Page Two (1917) The Guilty One (1924) The Buried Treasure (1919) A Family Flivver (1917) Bluff (1924) The Guardian of the Accolade (1919) The Renaissance at Charleroi (1917) When a Girl Loves (1924) A Stitch in Time (1919) The Bottom of the Well (1917) Don't Call It Love (1923) Shocks of Doom (1919) The Furnished Room (1917) The Ten Commandments (1923) The Girl Problem (1919) The Defeat of the City (1917) The Marriage Maker (1923) Transients in Arcadia (1918) Richard the Brazen (1917) Racing Hearts (1923) A Bird of Bagdad (1918) The Dazzling Miss Davison (1917) The Heart Raider (1923) Springtime à la Carte (1918) The Mirror (1917) A Daughter of Luxury (1922) Mammon and the Archer (1918) Hedda Gabler (1917) Clarence (1922) One Thousand Dollars (1918) The Debt (1917) Borderland (1922) The Girl and the Graft (1918) Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Milch Galleries
    THE MILCH GALLERIES YORK THE MILCH GALLERIES IMPORTANT WORKS IN PAINTINGS AND SCULPTURE BY LEADING AMERICAN ARTISTS 108 WEST 57TH STREET NEW YORK CITY Edition limited to One Thousand copies This copy is No 1 his Booklet is the second of a series we have published which deal only with a selected few of the many prominent American artists whose work is always on view in our Galleries. MILCH BUILDING I08 WEST 57TH STREET FOREWORD This little booklet, similar in character to the one we pub­ lished last year, deals with another group of painters and sculp­ tors, the excellence of whose work has placed them m the front rank of contemporary American art. They represent differen tendencies, every one of them accentuating some particular point of view and trying to find a personal expression for personal emotions. Emile Zola's definition of art as "nature seen through a temperament" may not be a complete and final answer to the age-old question "What is art?»-still it is one of the best definitions so far advanced. After all, the enchantment of art is, to a large extent, synonymous with the magnetism and charm of personality, and those who adorn their homes with paintings, etchings and sculptures of quality do more than beautify heir dwelling places. They surround themselves with manifestation of creative minds, with clarified and visualized emotions that tend to lift human life to a higher plane. _ Development of love for the beautiful enriches the resources of happiness of the individual. And the welfare of nations is built on no stronger foundation than on the happiness of its individual members.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Redefining Zorro: Hispanicising the Swashbuckling Hero
    Redefining Zorro: Hispanicising the Swashbuckling Hero Victoria Kearley Introduction Such did the theatrical trailer for The Mask of Zorro (Campbell, 1998) proclaim of Antonio Banderas’s performance as the masked adventurer, promising the viewer a sexier and more daring vision of Zorro than they had ever seen before. This paper considers this new image of Zorro and the way in which an iconic figure of modern popular culture was redefined through the performance of Banderas, and the influence of his contemporary star persona, as he became the first Hispanic actor ever to play Zorro in a major Hollywood production. It is my argument that Banderas’s Zorro, transformed from bandit Alejandro Murrieta into the masked hero over the course of the film’s narrative, is necessarily altered from previous incarnations in line with existing Hollywood images of Hispanic masculinity when he is played by a Hispanic actor. I will begin with a short introduction to the screen history of Zorro as a character and outline the action- adventure hero archetype of which he is a prime example. The main body of my argument is organised around a discussion of the employment of three of Hollywood’s most prevalent and enduring Hispanic male types, as defined by Latino film scholar, Charles Ramirez Berg, before concluding with a consideration of how these ultimately serve to redefine the character. Who is Zorro? Zorro was originally created by pulp fiction writer, Johnston McCulley, in 1919 and first immortalised on screen by Douglas Fairbanks in The Mark of Zorro (Niblo, 1920) just a year later.
    [Show full text]
  • DINNERS ENROLL TOM SAWYER.’ at 2:40
    1 11 T 1 Another Film for Film Fans to Suggest Gordon tried out in the drama, "Ch.!« There Is dren of Darkness.” It was thought No ‘Cimarron’ Team. Janet’s Next Role. in Theaters This Week the play would be a failure, so they Photoplays Washington IRENE DUNNE and ^ Wesley Ruggles, of the Nation will * fyJOVIE-GOERS prepared to abandon It. A new man- who as star and director made be asked to suggest the sort of agement took over the property, as- WEEK OP JUNE 12 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY cinematic history in 1931 In “Cimar- Stopping picture In which little Janet Kay signed Basil Sydney and Mary Ellis "Bit Town Olrl." "Manneouln." "Manneouln." are to be "Naughty Marietta" "Haughty Marietta" "Thank You. Ur. ron," reunited as star and Chapman. 4-year-old star dis- to the leads and Academy "alfm*83ifl£L'‘ Jon Hall in Will Rogers in Will Rosen in and ‘•The Shadow of and "The Shadow of Moto.” and "Ride. recently they scored a Broad- " director of a Paramount to Sth »nd O Sts. B.E, "The Hu-rlcane." "The Hurricane." _"David Harum "David Harum."_Silk Lennox."_ Silk Lennox." Ranter. Ride." picture covered by a Warner scout, should be way hit. This Lad in } into in the Rudy Vailee Rudy Valle? in Rudy Vallee in Myrna Loy. Clark Oa- Myrna Loy. Clark Oa- Loretta Yoon* in go production early fall. next seen on the screen. Miss So It Is at this time of Ambassador •■Sm* "Gold Diggers in "Gold Diggers in "Oold in ble and ble Chap- only yea# DuE*niBin Diggers Spencer Tracy and Spencer Tracy "Four Men and a The announcement was made after man the 18th «nd OolumblA Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881 - 1973)
    Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881 - 1973) Pablo Picasso is considered to be the greatest artist of the 20th century, the Grand Master primo assoluto of Modernism, and a singular force whose work and discoveries in the realm of the visual have informed and influenced nearly every artist of the 20th century. It has often been said that an artist of Picasso’s genius only comes along every 500 years, and that he is the only artist of our time who stands up to comparison with da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael – the grand triumvirate of the Italian Renaissance. Given Picasso’s forays into Symbolism, Primitivism, neo-Classicism, Surrealism, sculpture, collage, found-object art, printmaking, and post-WWII contemporary art, art history generally regards his pioneering of Cubism to have been his landmark achievement in visual phenomenology. With Cubism, we have, for the first time, pictorial art on a two-dimensional surface (paper or canvas) which obtains to the fourth dimension – namely the passage of Time emanating from a pictorial art. If Picasso is the ‘big man on campus’ of 20th century Modernism, it’s because his analysis of subjects like figures and portraits could be ‘shattered’ cubistically and re-arranged into ‘facets’ that visually revolved around themselves, giving the viewer the experience of seeing a painting in the round – all 360º – as if a flat work of art were a sculpture, around which one walks to see its every side. Inherent in sculpture, it was miraculous at the time that Picasso could create this same in-the-round effect in painting and drawing, a revolution in visual arts and optics.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebecca Horn Introduction of Works
    REBECCA HORN INTRODUCTION OF WORKS • Parrot Circle, 2011, brass, parrot feathers, motor t = 28 cm, Ø 67 cm | d = 11 in, Ø 26 1/3 in Since the early 1970s, Rebecca Horn (born 1944 in Michelstadt, Germany) has developed an autonomous, internationally renowned position beyond all conceptual, minimalist trends. Her work ranges from sculptural en- vironments, installations and drawings to video and performance and manifests abundance, theatricality, sensuality, poetry, feminism and body art. While she mainly explored the relationship between body and space in her early performances, that she explored the relationship between body and space, the human body was replaced by kinetic sculptures in her later work. The element of physical danger is a lasting topic that pervades the artist’s entire oeuvre. Thus, her Peacock Machine—the artist’s contribu- tion to documenta 7 in 1982—has been called a martial work of art. The monumental wheel expands slowly, but instead of feathers, its metal keels are adorned with weapon-like arrowheads. Having studied in Hamburg and London, Rebecca Horn herself taught at the University of the Arts in Berlin for almost two decades beginning in 1989. In 1972 she was the youngest artist to be invited by curator Harald Szeemann to present her work in documenta 5. Her work was later also included in documenta 6 (1977), 7 (1982) and 9 (1992) as well as in the Venice Biennale (1980; 1986; 1997), the Sydney Biennale (1982; 1988) and as part of Skulptur Projekte Münster (1997). Throughout her career she has received numerous awards, including Kunstpreis der Böttcherstraße (1979), Arnold-Bode-Preis (1986), Carnegie Prize (1988), Kaiserring der Stadt Goslar (1992), ZKM Karlsruhe Medienkunstpreis (1992), Praemium Imperiale Tokyo (2010), Pour le Mérite for Sciences and the Arts (2016) and, most recently, the Wilhelm Lehmbruck Prize (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Darryl F. Zanuck's <Em>Brigham Young</Em>: a Film in Context
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 29 Issue 1 Article 2 1-1-1989 Darryl F. Zanuck's Brigham Young: A Film in Context James V. D'Arc Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation D'Arc, James V. (1989) "Darryl F. Zanuck's Brigham Young: A Film in Context," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 29 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol29/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. D'Arc: Darryl F. Zanuck's <em>Brigham Young</em>: A Film in Context darryl F zanucks brigham young A film in context james V darc when darryl F zanucks brigham young was first released in 1940 president heber J grant of the church of jesus christ of latter day saints praised the motion picture as a friendmakerfriendmaker 1 I1 the prestigious hollywood studio twentieth century fox had spent more money on it than most motion pictures made up to that time its simultaneous premiere in seven theaters in one city still a world record was preceded by a grand parade down salt lake citescitys main street businesses closed for the event and the mayor proclaimed it brigham young day 2 not all reactions to the film however have been so favorable A prominent biographer of brigham young called the movie merely an interesting romance when a more authentic
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Davis Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts
    Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts in America Southern Methodist University The Southern Methodist University Oral History Program was begun in 1972 and is part of the University’s DeGolyer Institute for American Studies. The goal is to gather primary source material for future writers and cultural historians on all branches of the performing arts- opera, ballet, the concert stage, theatre, films, radio, television, burlesque, vaudeville, popular music, jazz, the circus, and miscellaneous amateur and local productions. The Collection is particularly strong, however, in the areas of motion pictures and popular music and includes interviews with celebrated performers as well as a wide variety of behind-the-scenes personnel, several of whom are now deceased. Most interviews are biographical in nature although some are focused exclusively on a single topic of historical importance. The Program aims at balancing national developments with examples from local history. Interviews with members of the Dallas Little Theatre, therefore, serve to illustrate a nation-wide movement, while film exhibition across the country is exemplified by the Interstate Theater Circuit of Texas. The interviews have all been conducted by trained historians, who attempt to view artistic achievements against a broad social and cultural backdrop. Many of the persons interviewed, because of educational limitations or various extenuating circumstances, would never write down their experiences, and therefore valuable information on our nation’s cultural heritage would be lost if it were not for the S.M.U. Oral History Program. Interviewees are selected on the strength of (1) their contribution to the performing arts in America, (2) their unique position in a given art form, and (3) availability.
    [Show full text]
  • MGM 70 YEARS: REDISCOVERIES and CLASSICS June 24 - September 30, 1994
    The Museum of Modern Art For Immediate Release May 1994 MGM 70 YEARS: REDISCOVERIES AND CLASSICS June 24 - September 30, 1994 A retrospective celebrating the seventieth anniversary of Metro-Goldwyn- Mayer, the legendary Hollywood studio that defined screen glamour and elegance for the world, opens at The Museum of Modern Art on June 24, 1994. MGM 70 YEARS: REDISCOVERIES AND CLASSICS comprises 112 feature films produced by MGM from the 1920s to the present, including musicals, thrillers, comedies, and melodramas. On view through September 30, the exhibition highlights a number of classics, as well as lesser-known films by directors who deserve wider recognition. MGM's films are distinguished by a high artistic level, with a consistent polish and technical virtuosity unseen anywhere, and by a roster of the most famous stars in the world -- Joan Crawford, Clark Gable, Judy Garland, Greta Garbo, and Spencer Tracy. MGM also had under contract some of Hollywood's most talented directors, including Clarence Brown, George Cukor, Vincente Minnelli, and King Vidor, as well as outstanding cinematographers, production designers, costume designers, and editors. Exhibition highlights include Erich von Stroheim's Greed (1925), Victor Fleming's Gone Hith the Hind and The Wizard of Oz (both 1939), Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), and Ridley Scott's Thelma & Louise (1991). Less familiar titles are Monta Bell's Pretty Ladies and Lights of Old Broadway (both 1925), Rex Ingram's The Garden of Allah (1927) and The Prisoner - more - 11 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019-5498 Tel: 212-708-9400 Cable: MODERNART Telex: 62370 MODART 2 of Zenda (1929), Fred Zinnemann's Eyes in the Night (1942) and Act of Violence (1949), and Anthony Mann's Border Incident (1949) and The Naked Spur (1953).
    [Show full text]