Naval Construction in Japan Facts and Figures Regarding the Strength of the Japanese Navy Today and III 1927

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Naval Construction in Japan Facts and Figures Regarding the Strength of the Japanese Navy Today and III 1927 JANUARY, 1922 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 25 Naval Construction in Japan Facts and Figures Regarding the Strength of the Japanese Navy Today and III 1927 By Hector C. Bywater HE strength of the Jap­ beyond the "eight-eight" T anese Navy, both at pres­ scheme, even though the ent and in the near future, Conference at Washington has become a -subject of deep should prove abortive in re­ interest to all who follow the gard to the restriction of trend of world affairs. Thirty armaments. years ago the sea power of Japan at the present mo­ Japan was a negligible quan­ ment is by no means so tity. Her navy was scarcely strong in capital ships as large enough to merit the ti­ seems to be popularly as­ tle, and the fleet that won sumed. Her dreadnought such a resounding victory at battle squadron comprises the Yalu River in 1894 was only seven ships-"Settsu," simply a cruiser squadron, "Fu-so," "Yamashiro," "Ise," though it contained all the "Hiuga," "Nagato," and effective ships then under the "Mutsu"-and it is doubtful flag of the Rising Sun. But whether the "Settsu," armed the success thus achieved by orily with 12-inch guns, can the young navy gave a great be considered a first-class impetus to expansion, and unit. The six remaining Battleship "Nagato," also "Mutsu." Displacement, 33,800 tons. Speed, 23 knots. Armament, when, ten years later, Japan ships are, however, equal in eight 16-in.; twenty 5.5-in.; eight torpedo tubes found herself on the verge of gun-power to any vessels war with Russia, she was able to muster a truly for­ led the world in respect of dimensions when she was afloat, and the "Nagato" and "Mutsu" remain for the midable fleet, including battleships, armored cruisers, completed in 1915, just as the later "Nagato," commis­ time being the strongest representatives of their type and other vessels of the most powerful type. With few sioned in December, 1920, remains the heaviest battle­ in any of the world's fleets. The only other all-big-gun exceptions, however, these new ships had been built ship-as distinct from battle cruisers-which has been ships are the four battle cruisers "Kongo" "Hi-yei," abroad, for Japan was not yet sufficiently versed in completed to date. By comparison with this rapid de­ "Haruna," and "Kirishima." Powerful though they be, naval architecture to undertake heavy construction on velopment of an industry that barely existed a genera­ these ships date from the pre-Jutland era, and are espe­ her own account. In reviewing the development of her tion ago the growth of German shipbuilding, which cially deficient in protection. They will lapse into fleet since the war with Russia the most interesting used to be considered very remarkable, was a slow and obsolescence as soon as the new type of battle cruiser fact to be noted is that prac­ now under design or con- tically all the ships which struction in the U nit e d post-date that period have States, Great Britain, and be e n built, armed, and Japan comes into service. It equipped by native industry. will be seen, therefore, that In some cases, it is true, cer­ the Japanese Navy of today tain structural parts, ma­ includes only eleven ships of chinery, guns, mountings, the dreadnought type, and and armor were purchased nearly half of these are, or abroad, but of late years the shortly will be, of problem­ import of naval material has atical fighting value. The been very limited; and real Significance of Japan's Japan, for all practical pur­ naval policy lies not in the poses, is now self-supporting size of her existing fleet, but in respect of naval shipbuild­ in the scope of her new pro­ ing and equipment. Her gram, which passed the Im­ progress to this position of perial Diet in July, 1920. independence was hastened This measure covered appro­ by the World War, for while priations for no fewer than that struggle continued she fourteen new capital ships, could obtain no supplies viz., six battleships and eight from Europe or the United battle cruisers, all of which States. She was therefore Battleship "Ise," also "Hiuga." Displacement, 31,260 tons. Speed, 23 knots. Armament, are to be completed in 1927. compelled to fall back upon Twelve 14-in.; twenty 5.5-in.; six torpedo tubes Four of the ships included her own resources, and these therein are now on the were so enlarged during the period of the war that Ad­ laborious process. There are now half a dozen ship­ stocks, leaving ten to be commenced· between now and miral Kato, the Minister of Marine, was able to an­ yards in Japan which could, if necessary, build war­ ]924 if the stipulated dates of completion are to be nounce last year that the whole of the naval construc­ ships of the largest dimensions. Given the necessary adhered to. 'rhe Japanese naval authorities are main­ tion then in hand would be built and equipped with funds and an adequate supply of material, Japan would taining impenetrable secrecy as to the characteristics none but Japanese labor and Japanese material. The therefore be in a position to reinforce her navy on a of all these vessels, but since they will be of consider­ literal accuracy of this statement is open to doubt, for far larger scale than she has done up to now. But the ably later design than any warship now constructing i:t has since been ascertained that orders for several present program is already straining her finances to in the United States or elsewhere, they may possibly thousand tons of armor and a few sets of submarine the utmost, and it is very improbable that she will go prove to be unique in size and gun-power. If no new engines were placed in Eng­ American construction is au­ land on. behalf of the Japan­ thorized in the interval, the ese Navy. On the other completion of the "eight­ hand, reports that certain eight" program will put capital ships and cruisers of Japan on an equality as re­ the "eight-eight" program gards post-Jutland ships. In would be built in England cruising vessels she will en­ have been authoritatively joy an absolute superiority. denied. Ten light cruisers of 25 The first large vessel to be knots and over have been constructed in Japan was the completed, four are building, "Tsukuba," an armored and twelve more have been cruiser of 13,750 tons. Begun authorized, giving a grand in January, 1905, she was total of twenty-six. Provi­ launched in the following sion has been made also for November and completed in an eventual establishment of December, 1906, having thus at least 100 destroyers and taken less than two years from 110 to 120 submarines. to build-a very notable The completion of this vast achievement. In Marc h , program will tax the Japan­ 1912, we find Japan laying ese shipbuilding, engineering, the keel of what was then and armament industries to the largest· and most power­ the utmost, and it yet re­ ful battleship ever designed. Battleship "Yamashiro;" also "Fuso." Displacement , 30.600 tons. Speed, 22.5 knots. mains to be seen whether This ship,- the "Fu-so," still Armament, Twelve 14-in.; sixteen 6-in.; six torpedo tubes they are competent to under- © 1922 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC 26 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN JANUARY, 1922 take and complete so much than mining produce oxides work during the next six of nitrogen which have a years. deleterious effect on individ- Although no official figures uals breathing them for any have ever been published, it length of time. is well known that shipbuild- Two gases that result ing in Japan is very expen- ttttMj -1 from the firing of explosives sive. The battleships "Na- are, because of their physi- gato" and "Mutsu," of 33,SOO ological effects, important in tons, are said to have cost mine ventilation. They are $35,000,000 apiece. Taking carbon monoxide and oxides - - $40,000,000 as a very con- of nitrogen. Other gases pro- servative average for the duced at the same time, in- fourteen capital ships yet to _ cluding carbon dioxide, hy- be completed, the building of drogen, methane, and nitro- these vessels alone will in- Submarine "No. 26." Class of eight built 1917 to 1921. Displacement, surface, 800 tons; submerged, gen, are unimportant unless 1100 tons. Details not available; believed to be generally similar to our own 800-ton boats volve Japan in an expendi- in proportions sufficient to ture of $560,000,000; and to this must be added the cost which under-water craft operating in the Far East diminish appreciably the oxygen content of the mine of all the new light cruisers, destroyers, submarines, have to navigate. The experiment does not appear to air. Carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen usually " and auxiliaries. No wonder that the Japanese naval have been a conspicuous success, for according to recent occur together and are very harmful, even when inhaled budget, which already swallows up 35 per cent of the reports the native constructors have now adopted a de- in small quantities. About 0.01 or 0.02 per cent Is the total revenue, is expected to absorb as much as 40 per sign based upon that of the surrendered German U- maximum quantity of carbon monoxide allowable con­ cent a few years hence. boats. AmQng the submarines building in Japan are tinuously in mine air without affecting the workmen Warship construction in Japan has hitherto developed several very large boats, of 2000 tons or more, with an harmfully, although as much as 0.04 per cent is harm­ along fairly original lines: The latest battleships have extensive cruising range and equipped with mine-laying less for periods of time not exceeding one hour.
Recommended publications
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • STAR TREK - SCOUT / DESTROYER If Printed 17 Inches Tall (From Black-Outlined Edge to Black-Outlined Edge) the Scale of These Drawings Is 1/350
    STAR TREK - SCOUT / DESTROYER If printed 17 inches tall (from black-outlined edge to black-outlined edge) the scale of these drawings is 1/350. LAYOUT: PORT PROFILE PAGE 1 of 2 0 5 10 15 20 COPYRIGHT 2020 - PARAMOUNT DRAWN BY: Jim Botaitis METERS 28 feet - to match the interior 24 feet - as stated by Captain Kirk 21 feet - to match the exterior 5' 10" human 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 STANDARD SHUTTLECRAFT CARGO SHUTTLECRAFT 5 FEET 6 1/100 scale, if this page is printed at a height of 17 inches 7 SEPARATION PLANE 8 SEE NOTE "A" 9 10 11 12 13 14 SEE NOTE "F" SPACE SHUTTLE (Shown here for size reference) BACKGROUND HISTORY NOTES GENERAL NOTES Are the wide steps in Engineering considered to be "stairs"? Are the steps on the Bridge considered to be "stairs"? This project is an extrapolation of the U.S.S. ENTERPRISE drawings developed earlier this year. Those drawings were governed by If you are familiar with my ENTERPRISE plans, I started at the edge of the primary hull (see image below), where the height of 2 decks, Stairs do not appear in any episodes, but that does not mean they do not exist in Starfleet ships. Therefore: 3 criteria: (1) The 11-foot (3.3-meter) studio model, (2) The Writer's Guide, and (3) The 79 episodes. There are no such criteria to the thickness of 1 floor, and the thickness of 2 hulls have to fit in this part of the saucer.
    [Show full text]
  • US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 Pre-War Classes
    US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 Pre-war Classes MARK STILLE ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 210 US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 Pre-war Classes MARK STILLE ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 NAVAL STRATEGY AND THE ROLE OF THE HEAVY CRUISER 4 USN HEAVY CRUISER DESIGN AND THE NAVAL TREATIES 6 USN HEAVY CRUISER WEAPONS 8 USN HEAVY CRUISER RADAR 10 PENSACOLA CLASS 11 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service NORTHAMPTON CLASS 17 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service PORTLAND CLASS 25 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service NEW ORLEANS CLASS 30 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service WICHITA CLASS 42 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 PRE-WAR CLASSES INTRODUCTION In the interwar period, the United States Navy (USN) built 18 large cruisers. These came to be known as “heavy cruisers” because of their size and later because of their armament. All of these ships were built under limitations resulting from a series of naval treaties, and thus they were also known as “treaty cruisers.” These ships gave valuable service during World War II and saw action in all the major battles in the Pacific. A separate volume will cover the heavy cruisers built during and after the war that saw service not only in 1941–45, but also later in the Korean and Vietnam conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreadnought Florida Beats World's Navies
    THE SUN, SUNDAY, MARCH 31, 1912. DREADNOUGHT FLORIDA BEATS WORLD'S NAVIES nbout 27.000 tons which will lo christened the cost of her construction and her arma- 14,405 Ions and 17.11 knots; tho Missouri, tho New York, and which with her ment will finally total close to $8,ooo,om, 13,5'rl tons and 18.15 knots; tho Nebraska, Uncle Sam Demonstrates That He skier ship, lho Toxns, will bo required Her four propollors aro run by turblnn 10,001 totmnnd lO.oflknoU; tho New Hamp- Speed of 22.54 Knots Over a Measured to make Iwepty-on- o knots, and tho naval engines of tho Parsons type, which develop shire, 17,781 tons and 18,10 knot3J tho Now officers who are petnonally concerned a horso-powe- r of about 28.000. Sho will Jersey, 10,014, tons and 10.18 knots; the iMile Course Attained, Surpassing Can Build Warships as Well as bollevn that sho also will lo n record carry 2,500 tons of coal and 400 tons of oil. North Dukotn, sister of tho Delaware, breaker. They aro oven prophesying that Her complement Is 051 men and sixty 22.000 tons and 21.01 knots; tho Ohio, Fight Hard in Them After they m.iy bn able to bring her speed up officers. Sho Is 521 feet 8 Inches long and 13,500 tons and 17.81 knots; tho Oregon, AU Previous Records of Any pretty cloe In twenty-thre- e knolH. The her greatest beam at tho water line is 83 now No.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingsmill's Cruisers: the Cruiser Tradition in the Early Royal Canadian Navy
    Kingsmill's Cruisers: The Cruiser Tradition in the Early Royal Canadian Navy. Kenneth P. Hansen1 Une étude des publications concernant les croiseurs de la structure de la force navale canadienne révèle un malentendu profond et répandu au sujet des rôles et des caractéristiques des nombreux types de croiseurs qu 'on a utilisés ou qu 'on a considérés comme étant utilisables au Canada. Le plan original concernant la flotte de la MRC en 1910 prévoyait centaines caractéristiques au niveau des croiseurs qu 'on peut maintenant considérer clairement, après une période intermédiaire importante, comme étant un sextant dans les frégates actuelles utilisées par la marine canadienne. Loin d'être un concept non pertinent d'une ère révolue, les caractéristiques essentielles des croiseurs de patrouille sont toutes aussi pertinentes aujourd'hui qu'elles l'étaient en 1910. Ces caractéristiques sont l'endurance, l'aptitude à la mer, les installations de commandement et de contrôle, et les emménagements utilisés en mer par le commandant et par son personnel. The RCN's ambition to acquire a "big ship navy" has resulted in charges of "institutional schizophrenia" by Canada's academic community.2 Recent scholarly research by Canadian naval officers also suggests that the post World War Two RCN was over reaching by trying to expand beyond a destroyer-based organization.3 A dichotomy is purported to exist between the need for high numbers of small escort vessels to fight recurrent anti-submarine wars in the North Atlantic and the professional navy's desire for a balanced force structure 1 The views presented in this paper are attributable solely of the author and are not to be construed in any way as declarations of policy by the Government of Canada, the Department of National Defence or the Canadian Forces, the Canadian Forces College, or any member of the Canadian Forces other than the author.
    [Show full text]
  • USN Ship Designations
    USN Ship Designations By Guy Derdall and Tony DiGiulian Updated 17 September 2010 Nomenclature History Warships in the United States Navy were first designated and numbered in system originating in 1895. Under this system, ships were designated as "Battleship X", "Cruiser X", "Destroyer X", "Torpedo Boat X" and so forth where X was the series hull number as authorized by the US Congress. These designations were usually abbreviated as "B-1", "C-1", "D-1", "TB-1," etc. This system became cumbersome by 1920, as many new ship types had been developed during World War I that needed new categories assigned, especially in the Auxiliary ship area. On 17 July 1920, Acting Secretary of the Navy Robert E. Coontz approved a standardized system of alpha-numeric symbols to identify ship types such that all ships were now designated with a two letter code and a hull number, with the first letter being the ship type and the second letter being the sub-type. For example, the destroyer tender USS Melville, first commissioned as "Destroyer Tender No. 2" in 1915, was now re-designated as "AD-2" with the "A" standing for Auxiliary, the "D" for Destroyer (Tender) and the "2" meaning the second ship in that series. Ship types that did not have a subclassification simply repeated the first letter. So, Battleships became "BB-X" and Destroyers became "DD-X" with X being the same number as previously assigned. Ships that changed classifications were given new hull numbers within their new designation series. The designation "USS" standing for "United States Ship" was adopted in 1907.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation: Prometheus V
    FICTION OPERATION: PROMETHEUS V. 1.0 OPERATION: PROMETHEUS BY CHARLES LEWIS - 1 - Captain Naismith of the TUS Arishikage, an older Terran Union scout cruiser, was pondering the message board in his lap, when his executive officer entered the bridge. “You wanted to see me, Sir?” “Yes, Jim. New orders.” He handed the XO the message board. “Come with me. Mr. Krishnu, you have the conn.” The captain got up to leave. “I have the conn, aye, Sir,” replied the navigator. About halfway to the captain’s quarters, the XO let out a shrill low whistle, but managed to hold his tongue until they were in private. “Are they making this stuff up? They’ve got to be nuts!” “What’s so crazy about it, Jim? Seems like a good plan to me.” So absorbed was he in his reading that Jim Somerville didn’t catch the sardonic tone in his captain’s voice. “What’s so crazy about it, Sir? Well, where do I begin? We’re supposed to ID a suitable target for an ambush shortly after it has transitioned from EDT into the system. Fine, easy enough. Then, they’re going to send a Carthage class cruiser with fighter escort to distract it. And finally, they’re going to stick some poor Marines into some experimental death traps they’re calling “breaching pods” to fly over, maneuvering at drone speeds mind you, cut into the target’s hull and capture it intact. The whole thing is insane!” Captain Naismith had allowed himself the luxury of a grin while his XO ranted.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Fleet Battles
    STAR FLEET BATTLES R11.0 THE LYRAN STAR EMPIRE MODULE R3 (AND MOD M) MODULE C1 R11.44 LYRAN COMMANDO WAR CRUISER (CWG) R11.1 LYRAN BACKGROUND R11.R1 LYRAN “+” FLEET REFITS MODULE R3 R11.R2 LYRAN “p” FLEET REFITS R11.45 LYRAN LIGHT CARRIER TRANSPORT (LTV) R11.R3 LYRAN MECH-LINKS R11.46 LYRAN MILITARY POLICE (MP) R11.R4 LYRAN UIM REFITS R11.R5 LYRAN POWER PACK MODULE R5 R11.R6 LYRAN ESG CAPACITOR R11.47 LYRAN CAVE LION BATTLESHIP (BB) R11.2 LYRAN LION DREADNOUGHT (DN) R11.48 LYRAN SIBERIAN LION HEAVY CARRIER (CVA) R11.3 LYRAN WILDCAT BATTLECRUISER (BC) R11.49 LYRAN SIBERIAN HELLCAT (BCV) R11.4 LYRAN TIGER HEAVY CRUISER (CA) R11.50 LYRAN FIRECAT BATTLE CONTROL SHIP (BCS) R11.5 LYRAN PANTHER LIGHT CRUISER (CL) R11.51 LYRAN JAVA TIGER HEAVY COMMAND CRUISER (CCH) R11.6 LYRAN LEOPARD DESTROYER (DD) R11.52 LYRAN KING JAGUAR NEW HEAVY CRUISER (NCA) R11.7 LYRAN CHEETAH FRIGATE (FF) R11.53 LYRAN MOUNTAIN LION (DND) R11.8 LYRAN MINSWEEPER (MS) R11.54 LYRAN SPACE CONTROL PALLET (Pal-SCS) R11.9 LYRAN OCELOT SCOUT (SC) MODULE R6 (AND MOD M) R11.55 LYRAN COMMANDO DESTROYER (DDG) MODULE K R11.10 LYRAN PF TENDER (PFT) MODULE R6 R11.56 LYRAN RUNNING TIGER FAST CRUISER (CF) MODULE C1 R11.57 LYRAN ALLEYCAT-V MOBILE CARRIER (DWV) R11.11 LYRAN CHEETAH-E ESCORT FRIGATE (FFE) R11.58 LYRAN CHEETAH-R FAST CARRIER RESUPPLY FRIGATE R11.11A LYRAN CHEETAH-A AEGIS FRIGATE (FFA) (FCR) R11.12 LYRAN SIBERIAN TIGER CARRIER (CV) R11.59 LYRAN TOP-ALLEYCAT HEAVY WAR DESTROYER (HDW) R11.13 LYRAN JAGUAR WAR CRUISER (CW) R11.60 LYRAN ABYSSINIAN POLICE FLAGSHIP (FLG) R11.14 LYRAN
    [Show full text]
  • V" Cruiser's Only Means of Self-Defens- E Will V4 Be Found in a Doaen Three-Inc- H Rapid-Fi- T Pi Guns
    c ' ' - ! H 'ft-- I A! 'J rapid as that of the armored crslseri above nientlMied. but they displace only 9,700 tons, and carry none of the eight-Inc- h I guns, such as constitute the mala battery of iach armored cruiser. ? r-- shin-yard- s, tfr fcp"sW On the stocks In New England but less than half finished, are 5 three thoroughly unique ships that are to be christened, respectively, Chester, Bir- mingham and r?alem. Thene are to be known as "scout cruisers," from whlch -- 3 v name their function In naval warfare ma; readily be guessed, and the Idea of having-suc- h ships In the fleet bufl been borrowed by Uncle Sam from Great Britain, where several such craft have recently been con- structed for the purpose of keeping tab on an enemy's fleet. Since a scout cruiser upon discovering the approach of a hos- tile squadron must not ouly be agile enough to evade capture, but must also be qualified to race home and give warn- SsW ing. It goes without saying that speed Is a prime requisite In such a vessel, and accordingly the trio of new Tankee scouts will each be fitted with engines of 16.000-horsepowe- r, capable of dr!vlng her through the water at a clip of 28 mile per hour, or better. The new scout cruisers wl!l be doubly Interesting, from the fact that the Ntvy ikJttiiL,,..jr Department will try an innovation la the meaner of obtaining speed. One of the ships the Birmingham will be J3Z772?G-jBUTZ.Tj- T 3 4 with triple-expansio- n 5 equipped ordinary engines of the same general pattern as those Installed In all our warships for 0 years past, but the other two scouts will be fitted with steam turbines, the newest wrinkle In power producing machinery and apparatus, such as has gained credit for tbe exceptional speed of the new trans-Atlanti- c passenger steamers of the Cunard Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Review of Cruiser Characteristics, Roles and Missions
    Ser 05D /68 28 March 2005 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF CRUISER CHARACTERISTICS, ROLES AND MISSIONS SFAC Report Number 9030-04-C1 Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited FUTURE CONCEPTS AND SURFACE SHIP DESIGN GROUP (05D) NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND 1333 ISAAC HULL AVENUE S.E. WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, D.C. 20376 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 12/31/04 Ship Mission Study 04/04-12/04 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER A Historical Review of Cruiser Characteristics, 5b. GRANT NUMBER Roles and Missions 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 0603563N S2196 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Sean Walsh, lead author, and a team of experts 5e.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Adlerican
    DECEMBER 7, 1907· Scientific ADlerican. THE TRUE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PACIFIC CRUISE. istration, the inference is irresistible that there was is reached of fast steaming, and firing with the utmost BY CAPT. A. T. MAHAN. deliberate intention to parallel the sending of our fleet quickness with which the guns can be handled. In The projected movement of an American fleet of. six­ from our one coast to our other to a measure as offen­ like manner the maneuvering of a body of several teen battleships, with attendant smaller vessels, from sive as those named. The distinguishing characteristic ships in rapid movement, changing from one forma­ the Atlantic to the Pacific coast of the United States of the movement now projected, from the international tion to another, for the ultimate purposes of battle, is an event not only important, ·both from the profes­ point of view, is that it is not in the nature of a demon­ must progress gradually, in order that commanding offi­ sional and national point of view, but striking to the stration, peaceful or hostile, off the coast of any other cers and their unter-studies may gain, not only abil­ imagination. It carries in itself certan elements of state, much less off that of one with whom our rela­ ity, but confidence, based upon habit; upon knowledge grandeur. It is therefore not surprising that it should tions are asserted by the press to be delicate. Not of what tneir own ships can do, and what they may have attracted particular notice from the press; but every man in the street, however, could detect the expect from the other vessels about them.
    [Show full text]