Town of Jupiter
TOWN OF JUPITER
DATE: November 19, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council THRU: Matt Benoit, Town Manager FROM: David Brown, Utilities Director MB John R. Sickler, Director of Planning and Zoning
SUBJECT: Glyphosate Use Reduction –Resolution to call for a reduction in the use of products containing glyphosate by the Town and its contractors and encouraging a reduction in use by the public
HEARING DATES: ETF 11/4/19 PZ #19-4030 TC 11/19/19 Resolution #108-19
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Consideration of a resolution recognizing the potential human health and environmental benefits of reducing the use of glyphosate-based herbicides by Town employees and its contractors.
Background While glyphosate and formulations such as Roundup have been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide, concerns about their effects on humans and the environment persist, and have grown as the global usage of glyphosate increases. There is a growing belief by some that glyphosate may be carcinogenic. Much of this concern is related to use on food crops and direct exposure via application of the herbicide. In 2015, glyphosate was classified as a probable carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, an arm of the World Health Organization (Attachment A). However, this designation was not without controversy (Attachment B) and it is important to note that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans and is not currently banned for use by the U.S. government (pg. 143, Attachment C). In addition, the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences continues to recommend the use of glyphosate as a weed control tool with the caveat that users of these products must carefully read and follow all label directions (Attachment D). There are also some potential environmental impacts of glyphosate as evidenced in studies which conclude that it is toxic to some aquatic species, but the level of toxicity appears to be driven by dosage and application practices. While the evidence linking glyphosate to harmful effects on human health is inconclusive, it is important to reduce potential risks to both residents and the environment whenever possible. Reducing risks is consistent with Policy 1.5.10 of the Conservation Element of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, which encourages a reduction in the use of fertilizers, pesticides and other potentially harmful chemicals.
As the level of public concern has become more elevated, numerous public agencies in Florida have proactively moved to ban or reduce the use of glyphosate. Based on our research this list includes:
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ceased using aquatic herbicides, glyphosate chief among them, anywhere in state waters, while the agency gathers public input. Key West, Florida – Key West City Commission banned the use of Roundup on city-owned property. Martin County, Florida – The County Commission has requested all county employees and contractors working on county projects eliminate the use of glyphosate-based herbicides. Miami, Florida – Announced a city-wide ban on glyphosate-based herbicides in February of 2019. Miami Beach, Florida – Passed a resolution banning the use of glyphosate weed killers for landscaping and maintenance work on city-owned property. North Miami, Florida – City Council approved a plan calling for the gradual reduction of pesticide use on city property and a study on alternative pesticides. Satellite Beach, Florida – City Council unanimously approved a resolution that bans the city and its contractors from using glyphosate-based herbicides. Stuart, Florida – City commissioners voted to ban glyphosate, calling for an integrated pest control plan that reduces the use of glyphosate.
Alternatives Glyphosate products have already been removed from the maintenance regimes of the Town’s Parks Division as well as the Utilities Department. These departments have switched to alternative products such as Cheetah Pro and SureGuard. They are glyphosate free; however, as with many chemical products, if not applied appropriately they too can result in harm. Cheetah Pro has been used by the Town’s Parks Division over the past year and thus far are very pleased with its effectiveness. However, the type of vegetation needing control in these types of recreation settings and other landscape areas is typically less aggressive and has less of an impact on native ecosystems than the types and sizes of invasive exotic plants encountered in the Town’s open space/preservation areas, which include vines and woody shrubs. Additionally, the fact sheet for Cheetah Pro does not include information about application for habitat restoration and management activities, while the fact sheet for Roundup specifically describes appropriate application of the product for these activities. Glyphosate is the most effective known herbicide for control of invasive exotics commonly found in natural areas, as it allows for targeted application of small quantities, with treatment occurring every three months instead of weekly or bi-weekly as is common on other Town landscape areas and parks.
Glyphosate has been utilized as a primary means of maintenance and control of invasive exotic vegetation on the Town’s open space properties. Staff made inquiries and received responses from several contractors that apply herbicides on Town property as to the availability of effective alternatives and how their work would be affected by removing glyphosate from their options. The general consensus is that while there may be effective alternatives for parks and landscape areas that are regularly mowed and maintained, glyphosate remains the most important herbicide to use in natural areas management due to its effectiveness at controlling the types of invasive exotics, without the need for increased volume of chemicals or additional treatment visits. It is also noteworthy that there is minimal human traffic in the portions of the open space properties where these herbicides are used. That being said, the Town staff will now require posting of informational signage at all natural areas during treatment periods. Staff will continue to investigate alternative products for use in open space properties as more research and field study information becomes available, including the potential testing of alternatives on select open space properties.
Cost/Effectiveness Based on the information staff received, the alternative herbicides do have a higher cost. The net annual cost increase of mandating the use of glyphosate-fee alternative herbicides in parks, public works and utility applications would be approximately $20,000 or more, depending on the chemical. Town contractors responsible for the maintenance of open space/natural area properties indicated that chemical costs alone for potential alternatives would potentially be 3-4 times greater, resulting in an increase of approximately $16,000 annually. Currently, application of herbicide in the open space properties is quarterly. Due to the types of vegetation being controlled and based on feedback from these contractors, alternatives may not be as effective in the natural setting, potentially resulting in higher amounts of herbicide being necessary as well as more frequent applications. This would result in increased labor costs as well as greater environmental concerns, not only in terms of increased quantities of alternative chemicals applied, but also the potential consequences of the ability to adequately maintain quality native habitat.
Reduction/Smart Application The purpose of this resolution is to address concerns related to the use of products containing glyphosate and to reduce the potential hazards of these products on Town owned property by adopting a strategy of elimination, reduction and smart application, combined with an effort to encourage the public and other agencies to reduce the use of these products through education and outreach.
This will be accomplished by adopting the following strategies: Elimination - Cease using products containing glyphosate in parks, playgrounds and landscape areas with human traffic; Reduction - Consider potential alternatives that are safe and effective and limit the use of products containing glyphosate to areas of minimal human traffic such as landscape medians and exotic plant management in natural areas; Smart Application - Follow best management practices for the use and application of herbicides (minimize use, prevent over-spray, reduce the potential for runoff by spraying at appropriate times, etc.) and ensure that all applicators, whether Town employees, applicators on Town owned property or contractors licensed to work within the Town, are fully trained and licensed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service, and require that proof of such licensure is provided at time of application for a Business Tax Receipt; Education – Post information about proper herbicide use on the Town’s website and social media sites.
Should the Council adopt this resolution, the new requirements would be implemented upon initiation of new contracts, renewal of existing contracts and potentially through modifications to existing contracts.
ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS Staff presented the proposed resolution and executive summary to the Environmental Task Force at their regularly scheduled meeting on November 4, 2019. The Task Force recommended approval of Resolution 108-19 as written with the following comments: Emphasized the science is not settled regarding the potential for harm to human health and the environment from glyphosate based products; Recommended a stronger emphasis on proper use and application; Recommended a greater emphasis on public education; Cautioned that less is known about the long-term effects of alternatives. Suggested the need to articulate that alternatives are not necessarily of lesser impact to the environment or human health; Recommended a change from “eliminating” to “minimizing” the use of products containing glyphosate in line 19, page 2 of the resolution; Concur with the overall goal of reducing the use of chemicals; The resolution, as written, is broad enough to allow for future flexibility; Emphasized the effectiveness of glyphosate products on invasive exotic vegetation and their importance in ongoing efforts to maintain natural areas. The resolution has been updated to change “eliminating” to “minimizing” the use of products containing glyphosate in line 19, page 2 of the resolution
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Resolution No.108 -19.
Strategic Result: Safety; Green, Blue and Open Spaces
Attachments: Resolution # 108-19 Attachment A – WHO Q & A Attachment B – Reuters Article Attachment C – EPA Report Attachment D - IFAS Fact Sheet
Funding Source:
Approved in Budget $ Sources:
X Additional Funding Required $ 36,000 Sources: TBD
V:\PlanningZoning\Staff\WP51\Signature - TC\Nov 19\Glyphosate (Barrett)\Glyphosate Executive Summary SAT comments.docx ATTACHMENT A
International Agency for Research on Cancer (tflP~~ World Health ~·ii Organization ~
1 March 2016
Q&A on Glyphosate
In March 2015, IARC classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A).
This was based on "limited" evidence of cancer in humans (from real-world exposures that actually occurred) and "sufficient" evidence of cancer in experimental animals (from studies of "pure" glyphosate).
IARC also concluded that there was "strong" evidence for genotoxicity, both for "pure" glyphosate and for glyphosate formulations.
The IARC Monographs evaluation is based on the systematic assembly and review of all publicly available and pertinent studies, by independent experts, free from vested interests. It follows strict scientific criteria, and the classification system is recognized and used as a reference all around the world . This is because IARC evaluations are based on independent scientific review and rigorous criteria and procedures.
To reach these conclusions, IARC reviewed about 1000 studies. Some of the studies looked at people exposed through their jobs, such as farmers. Others were experimental studies on cancer and cancer related effects in experimental systems.
Could the carcinogenic effects of glyphosate be related to the other chemicals in the formulations?
No. The IARC Monographs evaluation is based on the systematic assembly and review of all publicly available evidence relevant to the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. Most people's exposure to glyphosate concerns commercial formulations that include glyphosate and other ingredients. The Monograph included these studies of real-world exposures to humans. It also included experimental studies of "pure" glyphosate and of glyphosate-based formulations .
For the experimental studies of "pure" glyphosate, the Monograph concluded that the evidence for causing cancer in experimental animals was "sufficient" and the evidence for causing genotoxicity was "strong". The real-world exposures experienced by human populations are to a variety of formulations of glyphosate with other chemicals, because this is how glyphosate is mainly sold and used. Similar results were reported in studies of different formulations used in different geographical regions at different times.
Taking all of this evidence together, the IARC Working Group classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A). Following the criteria in the Preamble to the IARC Monographs, the classification of glyphosate is based on "limited" evidence of cancer in humans (from exposures that actually occurred) and "sufficient" evidence of cancer in experimental animals (from studies of "pure" glyphosate). This classification is further supported by "strong" evidence for genotoxicity, both for "pure" glyphosate and for glyphosate formulations.
IARC, 150 Cours Albert Thomas , 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France - Tel: +33 (0)4 72 73 84 85 - Fax: +33 (0)4 72 73 85 75 © IARC 2016 -All Rights Reserved. Page 2 Q&A on Glyphosate
Could the co-formulants be the cause of the genotoxic effects reported in the IARC Monograph?
With regard to genotoxicity, the IARC Working Group evaluated studies of "pure" glyphosate as well as studies of glyphosate-based formulations. The Working Group reached the same hazard conclusion for glyphosate and for its formulations: they concluded that the evidence for genotoxicity was "strong" for glyphosate and "strong" for glyphosate formulations.
Several of the epidemiological studies considered by the IARC expert Working Group showed increased cancer rates in occupational settings after exposure to glyphosate herbicides. Can this be attributed to glyphosate as a single ingredient or could it be due to other chemicals in the formulations?
Real-world exposures that people experience are to glyphosate in formulated products. Studies of humans exposed to different formulations in different regions at different times reported similar increases in the same type of cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Data on "pure" glyphosate from animal and other experimental studies, including on human cells, support the conclusion from the studies of exposed people. For the studies of "pure" glyphosate, the Monograph concluded that the evidence for cancer in experimental animals was "sufficient" and the evidence for genotoxicity was "strong".
One of the key studies evaluated in the Monograph was the United States Agricultural Health Study (AHS). This study did not find an association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and glyphosate. Can this study alone outweigh the positive associations found in other epidemiological studies?
The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) has been described as the "most powerful" study, but this is not correct. The AHS collected data on cancer and pesticide use in more than 50 000 farmers and pesticide applicators in two states in the USA. The weakness of the study is that people were followed up for a short period of time, which means fewer cases of cancer would have had time to appear. This factor can limit the ability of a study to detect an association if one truly exists. Therefore, although the AHS is a large, well-conducted study, its results on glyphosate and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk do not outweigh those of other studies.
The IARC Working Group also conducted an objective statistical analysis of the results of all of the available studies on glyphosate and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which included the AHS and all of the case control studies. The data from all of the studies combined show a statistically significant association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and exposure to glyphosate.
In the studies IARC evaluated, were there cancers only seen in animals exposed to the toxic doses of glyphosate?
No. The IARC Working Group identified statistically significant trends of higher numbers of cancers with higher doses of "pure" glyphosate in studies of mice, suggesting increasing response with dose. Cancers were seen in the absence of toxicity.
An important consideration in the IARC Working Group's evaluation was that glyphosate caused unusual types of tumours, which are very rarely seen in untreated animals. Rare tumours can provide important evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship, but may only be seen at high doses. The IARC Working Group's evaluation of these tumours was in line with accepted principles and gave highly significant results.
IARC, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France - Tel: +33 (0)4 72 73 84 85 - Fax: +33 (0)4 72 73 85 75 © IARC 2016 -All Rights ReseNed. Page 3 Q&A on Glyphosate
Regulatory agencies have reviewed the key studies examined by IARC - and more - and concluded that glyphosate poses no unreasonable risks to humans. What did IARC do differently?
Many regulatory agencies rely primarily on industry data from toxicological studies that are not available in the public domain. In contrast, IARC systematically assembles and evaluates all relevant evidence available in the public domain for independent scientific review.
For the IARC Monograph on glyphosate, the total volume of publications and other information sources considered by the Working Group was about 1000 citations. All citations were then screened for relevance, following the principles in the Preamble to the IARC Monographs.
After this screening process, the Monograph sections on cancer epidemiology and cancer bioassays in laboratory animals cited every included study. The sections on exposure and mechanisms of carcinogenesis consider representative studies and therefore do not necessarily cite every identified study. Once published, the IARC Monograph on glyphosate cited 269 references.
In the interests of transparency, IARC evaluations rely only on data that are in the public domain and available for independent scientific review. The IARC Working Group's evaluation of glyphosate included any industry studies that met these criteria. However, they did not include data from summary tables in online supplements to published articles, which did not provide enough detail for independent assessment. This was the case with some of the industry studies of cancer in experimental animals.
With the material reviewed by the Working Group, there was enough evidence to conclude that glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans.
What does IARC's classification mean in terms of the probability of developing a cancer?
The IARC Working Group's classification of glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A) is based on "limited" evidence of cancer in humans (from real-world exposures that actually occurred) and "sufficient" evidence of cancer in experimental animals (from studies of "pure" glyphosate). This classification is further supported by "strong" evidence for genotoxicity, both for "pure" glyphosate and for glyphosate formulations.
The IARC Monographs evaluation is a hazard classification. It indicates the strength of evidence that glyphosate can cause cancer. The probability of developing a cancer will depend on factors such as the type and extent of exposure and the strength of the effect of the agent.
IARC, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France - Tel: +33 (0)4 72 73 84 85 - Fax: +33 (0)4 72 73 85 75 © IARC 2016 - All Rights Reserved. ATTACHMENT B ÿ ÿÿ !!ÿ!ÿ""ÿ # $ %!! !& '"
()012134ÿ617)8ÿ69@ÿ)ABCD@EFÿGFHCFÿHIÿPCFIHQ@BHFRÿS9@T9@BÿTCÿEUUCSÿT9@ÿPCFTHFA@QÿAI@ÿCVÿT9@ÿS@@QWHUU@BÿRUXD9CIET@Yÿ`BEFP@ÿ9EIÿIEHQÿHT SCAUQÿUHW@ÿTCÿD9EI@ÿHTÿCATYÿ2Ca@ÿVEBa@BIÿIEXÿIAP9ÿEÿaCb@ÿSCAUQÿQEaER@ÿT9@HBÿcAIHF@IIYÿdcCb@eÿEÿ`B@FP9ÿVEBa@Bÿ9EBb@ITIÿS9@ETÿHFÿEÿVH@UQ HFÿFCBT9@BFÿ`BEFP@Yÿf)G6)f2ghEIPEUÿfCIIHRFCU
ipqrÿtpqÿurtqvrwtxyrwÿqrÿ yvÿqqwvpÿyr wrqvÿwqqÿtpqÿqtqxrÿqqxqv pywtqÿxrx xwrtÿpwrqÿqvqÿwq qtqqrÿwÿvw tÿy ÿxtÿvqyvtÿwrÿtpqÿxpq qvxyrÿdpqÿwqrÿyretÿwÿpyÿwqÿtpq pwrqÿyvÿp
fXÿhET@ÿh@UUEFQÿ`HU@Qÿ3PTYÿijeÿklimeÿn8nlÿDYaYÿo76
pqrsqrÿuÿvwxÿyz{|} ~x|wÿq{z ÿx{ xÿ}x}ÿ}ÿx}x} }ÿ{zÿÿ}{ÿzÿ {xxÿzÿwxÿxx}||x{ÿ|wzxÿwÿx{xÿÿz}}ÿwÿÿ| z|zÿwÿwxÿwx|ÿ{z|ÿxÿx{ ÿ szxÿxxÿÿxx{ÿwzÿwzÿÿ}{ÿzÿÿxÿxzÿzÿwx x{z|ÿxÿz{ÿxx{wÿzÿx{ ÿÿxxÿz |wzxÿÿÿ{xz{ÿwÿwÿ{zx}ÿx{z|ÿ}xÿ} |||z}z||{ÿ|ÿÿ}x{xÿÿwxÿ} }x|xzÿxz{xÿwxÿ{xz{ÿÿ|x}ÿ}ÿ}xÿ|
ÿx}ÿÿpzÿ{xÿx|}ÿwxÿ|xxÿÿÿx zzzÿÿzÿwxÿy~qÿwxÿx}ÿrzÿwx|wÿxÿ x}ÿÿ{xz{ÿzÿÿxxÿzÿ|wzxÿÿÿxÿ{x}xÿ zzÿz{ ÿzx||ÿxx}||x{ÿz}ÿÿÿ{wÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ!ÿÿ !! ÿ ÿÿ "
#$%&'$(ÿ012'$2'
3456789ÿ#54@ABCÿ'D5ÿEF1GHÿ68I65Aÿ8P5I6Qÿ95RBÿ7IÿBD5ÿS8ATÿ@U5A P9Q4D@H8B5ÿ5U7S5I65
EF1ÿ68I65Aÿ8P5I6Qÿ8HT5Sÿ5V45ABHÿB@ÿW7BD@9SÿW55ST7995AÿS@6XY5IBH
`ÿ ÿaÿ!ÿÿÿb cÿdaÿÿ ÿaÿeff dgÿ ÿÿ ÿÿh ÿÿg hÿdgÿ ÿÿÿÿh"ÿ`ÿ ÿÿ fÿÿ hÿh ÿÿÿiÿpÿÿqÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ! ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿr ÿiÿf hÿÿ ÿfÿb " ÿ `ÿÿfÿ! ÿs ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿfÿtusvcÿ da fÿÿh ÿ"ÿ`ÿ ÿaÿh ÿÿtusvc hÿfÿ ÿÿÿaÿÿh ÿÿÿtusv ÿ ÿaÿeffwÿdÿfÿ "ÿ xÿffÿfÿÿÿÿÿ f ÿ daÿ! ÿs ÿÿ h ÿaÿÿ! ÿ ÿaÿÿ hd ÿfÿh yÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿfÿÿ ÿ!a ÿÿ ÿÿ ! ÿh " tÿÿ ÿÿf ÿ ÿ ÿaÿ ÿÿffd d ÿÿ ÿfÿfÿÿ ÿ!ÿ daÿ! ÿtusv" tÿ ÿÿÿÿÿ fÿ f ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ! ÿb ÿÿÿi"p"ÿrd h ÿ ÿu "ÿtÿÿ ÿef h wÿÿeh wÿ ÿÿÿehwÿ ÿÿÿÿÿ! h ÿ aÿÿÿhÿ! "ÿtÿÿf ÿ! ÿtusvÿh ÿÿÿÿ! " ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿ ! "ÿÿ#$%&' ÿ(&)ÿ01 ÿ"1!$ÿ 0' 1"1"#ÿ'ÿ' ÿ0!&2"ÿ1"ÿ02 ÿ2!23ÿ' ÿ&24$1' ÿ5 1"ÿ0"0$2 ÿ' &&1 6
789@8ABÿDE9FGÿHIÿBPQFPDPRSF@ÿRTSFQ8Bÿ@TS@ÿU8A8ÿVSG8ÿW8@U88Fÿ@T8ÿGASD@ RTSX@8AÿEFÿSFPVSYÿB@9GP8BÿSFGÿ@T8ÿX9WYPBT8Gÿ`8ABPEFÿEDÿab7cdB QYeXTEBS@8ÿSBB8BBV8F@fÿaFÿ8SRTÿRSB8gÿSÿF8QS@P`8ÿREFRY9BPEFÿSWE9@ QYeXTEBS@8ÿY8SGPFQÿ@Eÿ@9VE9ABÿUSBÿ8P@T8AÿG8Y8@8GÿEAÿA8XYSR8GÿUP@TÿS F89@ASYÿEAÿXEBP@P`8ÿEF8fÿ789@8ABÿUSBÿ9FSWY8ÿ@EÿG8@8AVPF8ÿUTEÿVSG8ÿ@T8 RTSFQ8Bf ÿ ab7cÿGPGÿFE@ÿA8BXEFGÿ@Eÿh98B@PEFBÿSWE9@ÿ@T8ÿSY@8AS@PEFBfÿa@ÿBSPGÿ@T8ÿGASD@ USBÿiREFDPG8F@PSYpÿSFGÿiG8YPW8AS@P`8ÿPFÿFS@9A8fpÿbD@8Aÿ789@8ABÿSBq8G SWE9@ÿ@T8ÿRTSFQ8Bgÿ@T8ÿSQ8FReÿXEB@8GÿSÿB@S@8V8F@ÿEFÿP@BÿU8WBP@8ÿSG`PBPFQ @T8ÿBRP8F@PB@BÿUTEÿXSA@PRPXS@8ÿPFÿP@BÿUEAqPFQÿQAE9XBÿiFE@ÿ@EÿD88YÿXA8BB9A8G @EÿGPBR9BBÿ@T8PAÿG8YPW8AS@PEFBpÿE9@BPG8ÿ@T8ÿREFDPF8BÿEDÿab7cf
789@8ABÿREF@SR@8GÿHrÿBRP8F@PB@BÿUTEÿB8A`8GÿPFÿ@T8ÿab7cÿ8sX8A@ÿUEAqPFQ QAE9Xÿ@TS@ÿREFG9R@8Gÿ@T8ÿU88GqPYY8AÿA8`P8Uÿ@EÿSBqÿ@T8VÿSWE9@ÿ@T8ÿ8GP@B SFGÿG8Y8@PEFBfÿtEB@ÿGPGÿFE@ÿA8BXEFGuÿDP`8ÿBSPGÿ@T8eÿRE9YGÿFE@ÿSFBU8A h98B@PEFBÿSWE9@ÿ@T8ÿGASD@uÿFEF8ÿUSBÿUPYYPFQÿEAÿSWY8ÿ@EÿBSeÿUTEÿVSG8ÿ@T8 RTSFQ8BgÿEAÿUTeÿEAÿUT8Fÿ@T8eÿU8A8ÿVSG8f vT8ÿRTSPAVSFÿEDÿ@T8ÿab7cÿB9WwQAE9Xÿ@SBq8GÿUP@TÿA8`P8UPFQÿ8`PG8FR8ÿED QYeXTEBS@8dBÿ8DD8R@ÿEFÿYSWEAS@EAeÿSFPVSYBÿUSBÿcTSAY8BÿxSV8BEFgÿSF bV8APRSFÿ@EsPREYEQPB@fÿaFÿ@8B@PVEFeÿSBÿXSA@ÿEDÿX8ABEFSYwPFy9AeÿYSUB9P@B SQSPFB@ÿtEFBSF@EÿPFÿ@T8ÿFP@8Gÿ@S@8BgÿxSV8BEFÿ@EYGÿYSUe8ABÿDEA tEFBSF@EÿT8ÿGPGÿFE@ÿqFEUÿUT8FgÿUTeÿEAÿWeÿUTEVÿ@T8ÿ8GP@BÿTSGÿW88F VSG8f tEFBSF@EÿPBÿDSRPFQÿV9Y@PXY8ÿY8QSYÿRYSPVBÿPFÿ@T8ÿffÿDAEVÿXYSPF@PDDBÿUTE SYY8Q8ÿQYeXTEBS@8ÿQS`8ÿ@T8VÿEAÿ@T8PAÿYE`8GÿEF8BÿRSFR8AfÿxSV8BEFÿPBÿSF 8sX8A@ÿUP@F8BBÿDEAÿ@T8ÿXYSPF@PDDBfÿ8ÿGPGÿFE@ÿA8BXEFGÿ@Eÿh98B@PEFBÿDEAÿ@TPB SA@PRY8f ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ ! ÿ"ÿ #$ÿ%ÿ%ÿÿ%ÿ ÿ%& ÿ%&ÿ'()#0ÿ11! 1 $ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 2ÿ ÿ% ÿ "% 13
()#0ÿ ÿÿ113
45678ÿ46@AB8ACÿ7Dÿ8EFGEHIEPQÿRPEDSTÿUVPHEPWÿWGVXEYÿVÿYEH`DWGPVGa`Dÿ`DÿGTEÿbTVHFWcBdeWEEW VfEDgEÿaDÿ4VPaWQÿRPVDSEQÿG`ÿFP`GEWGÿVXVaDWGÿVÿF`WWaIdEÿIVDÿ`DÿXdeFT`WVGEhÿ6BiAB68p4TadaFFE q`rVsEP tuvwxÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿÿd ef
8GVGEHEDGÿF`WGEYÿIeÿ756bÿ`DÿaGWÿgEIWaGEÿVUGEPÿ6EgGEPWÿaDhgaPEYÿgT`ÿTVYÿHVYEÿSEPGVaDÿSTVDXEW G`ÿVÿYPVUGÿ`UÿaGWÿVWWEWWHEDGÿ`UÿXdeFT`WVGE i$1$ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ%ÿ & "%3ÿ()#0ÿ ÿ%ÿ "ÿÿÿ%ÿ ÿ%ÿ$!ÿ !! ÿ 3ÿ01 ÿ& %ÿ%ÿ ÿ()#0ÿ%ÿ $ ÿ!$ÿ ÿ &ÿ3ÿj ÿ&ÿ ÿ%ÿ!ÿ "ÿ 1 ! ÿ ÿ ÿ$%ÿÿ ÿ $1ÿÿ%&ÿ()#0ÿ ÿÿ ÿ 3 k%ÿl$ÿm ÿ "ÿ)$% "ÿnlm )oÿ ÿ%ÿ ÿ ÿ1 ÿ%ÿ& p ÿ%ÿ ÿ q1p ÿÿ'ÿ!ÿ 1ÿÿÿ %32ÿrÿksÿ% ÿÿlm )ÿ ÿ$ ÿ #$tÿ')"ÿÿÿÿlm )ÿ&! ÿ ÿ &ÿ%&ÿ% 1ÿ ÿÿ 13ÿ ÿ"$ÿÿÿ "ÿ%&ÿuÿv ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ !"#$ ÿ %ÿ ÿ&ÿ' (ÿ ÿ) ÿ0 ÿ1" ÿ ÿ ÿ2(3425 "ÿ ÿÿ ÿ 5 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ" ÿÿ""ÿ ÿÿ ÿ " ÿ ÿÿ" ÿ 6 ÿ3724# ÿ 8ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ%19@Aÿ" ÿ # ÿ ÿ %ÿ ÿÿÿÿBÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ%19@ (ÿ ÿ " Aÿ (ÿ@ ÿC(ÿÿ9ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ " Aÿ ÿ ÿDÿ ÿÿ ÿ"(ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ #$ÿCÿ ÿ %19@Aÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ" "ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ" ÿ"#
6)E)F%G8'ÿ186ÿ166%F%G8'
%19@ÿ ÿÿ!"ÿ"ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿD ÿH ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ#IÿPÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ" ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ!ÿ %19@AÿQ" ÿ223(ÿ ÿÿ22ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ " A B ÿÿEÿÿ ÿ!5"ÿ"ÿ "ÿÿQ ÿR( 372S#ÿF ÿ"ÿIÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ $ÿ %19@ÿ ÿ ÿ!"ÿ"ÿ (ÿD "ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ (Iÿ%19@ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ# ÿ
TUVWXYU`TaWbÿ`deÿdefghifpqeprÿstÿqdeÿTuqepufqvsufwÿaxeuyÿtspÿerefpydÿsuÿfuyepÿTaÿvu Wsu ÿVpfuyeÿ`deÿfxeuyrÿfrrerreuqrÿyfuÿdfeÿtfppefydvuxÿvfyqÿYX`Ysepqÿpfqqf ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ !"ÿ #$ÿ$ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ$ÿÿ%#ÿ& ÿ$%' ÿÿ ÿÿ& ÿ ÿ$'ÿÿ ÿ #ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ&ÿ ÿÿ &ÿ&%(
)ÿ ÿ ÿ !"0ÿ$%' ÿ ÿ1ÿ ÿ& ( 21 ÿÿ ÿÿ& ÿ&'ÿ3 ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ%$% $ÿÿ ÿ4 ÿ5 (ÿ ÿ 1ÿ ÿ6ÿ ÿ ÿ%ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ%'ÿ ÿÿ%$ ÿ1 ÿ&'ÿ % 'ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ (ÿÿ
7ÿ$%' ÿ 1ÿÿ !"0ÿ3$ ÿ889ÿ ÿ ÿ@9ÿ$Aÿ ÿÿ%ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿB ÿ1 ÿ8Cÿ$(ÿ ÿÿ ÿ'ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ'ÿ ÿ 'ÿ% ÿ$ ÿ ( ÿ ÿ $ÿ ÿÿ %ÿ1 ÿ ÿ ÿ6ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 1 %ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 1Aÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ%ÿ$%' ÿÿ ÿ $(ÿ7' ÿ %ÿÿ ÿ %ÿ1 ÿ ÿ ÿ DÿE7ÿF #$ G ÿÿ ÿ&%ÿ ÿ1% ÿ ÿ 'ÿ&ÿ ÿ ÿ% H %ÿ ÿ 1ÿÿ ÿ 1ÿ %ÿÿ% % (E ÿ
IPQRSÿUÿRVWQXYÿQÿ`abcdÿecÿVQPfghÿbhhihhpiqdÿrdestÿhbu`ÿdviÿhwuiqduhdhÿweq`xwduqyÿdvuhÿabdÿhdx` cexq`ÿdvbdÿysvehbdiÿ`u`qgdÿwbxhiÿwbqwiaÿSviÿcuqbÿiahueqÿepuddi`ÿdvbdÿhiqdiqwi
7ÿ ÿÿ ÿHÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ %ÿ1 (ÿÿ ÿ %ÿÿ 'ÿ%ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ&'ÿ ÿ $% 1 $ ÿÿ ÿ 'ÿ&$ÿ ÿÿDÿE7ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿ ! " ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ# ÿ !ÿÿ$" ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ%&'ÿ( ÿÿ ÿ )0 ÿ 1 ÿÿ2ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ2 2ÿ ÿ(ÿ )ÿ" ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ341%5ÿ ( 2ÿ2ÿ 22 ÿ6 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ() ÿ 7ÿ ÿ ÿÿ'89@ÿ ÿÿ( )ÿ341%AÿB ÿ( ÿÿ2 ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ2ÿ ÿ6ÿ2 ÿ )ÿ" ÿÿ6 ÿ2ÿÿ ÿ2 CÿB ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ( )ÿ341%Aÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ Dÿ B ÿ ÿ2 ÿ ÿ )
" ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ2ÿB ÿ( D B ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ2 ÿ6ÿÿBÿ1 )ÿ" ÿ ÿ6ÿ Cÿÿ(ÿ6 ÿÿ ÿ ÿBÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿBBÿ ) ÿ 3ÿ2 ÿ ÿ2ÿ ÿ(ÿ'89@ÿ Dÿ341%Aÿ2ÿB ÿ2ÿ ÿE ÿ ÿÿÿÿ ((ÿ ÿ& ÿ ÿCÿ2ÿ ÿÿ6 )ÿ" ÿ341%ÿ2 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ$(0ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ6 ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ( )ÿ341%Aÿ2ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ) ÿ
FGHIGFPÿRSTGPIRUVIGP
WXY`ÿF`ab`Ycÿdef`cbdghbdXecÿheiÿpXegqrXYsÿehYYhbdf`c
UXbÿhÿtXerdi`ebdhpÿe`ucÿbdvwÿF`ab`YcÿRef`cbdghb`cÿXrr`Ycÿc`f`YhpÿuhxcÿbX c`taY`pxÿtXebhtbÿXaYÿY`vXYb`Yc
16ÿÿ ÿ(ÿ Dÿ ÿ341%ÿ2 ÿ ÿÿ (( ÿ ÿ ÿ2ÿÿ ÿ2ÿ(ÿ ÿCÿ ( (ÿÿ$ ÿ2 0ÿÿB ÿ(ÿÿ2() 341%AÿB ÿ( DÿBÿ Dÿ ÿÿ2 ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ(ÿ( Dÿÿ ÿ ÿ 2ÿÿ ÿ2 ) ÿ ÿ 3yy"34ÿ7y7 14
341%5ÿ( ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿBBÿ (ÿ ÿÿ )ÿ3ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿCÿ2 ÿ (ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ! ÿ"ÿ # ÿ $ÿÿ"ÿ%$&'ÿ ÿ ÿ( ÿÿ! ÿ) ÿ0 ÿ 1 ÿ2 ÿ3 4 ÿ ÿ( 5ÿÿ ÿ"ÿ ÿ"ÿÿÿÿ ÿ #ÿ%ÿ ÿÿ5 ÿ5 6 ÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ #6 ÿ 7ÿ)#8#ÿ9( ÿ@ ÿ$ ÿ5 ÿ" ÿ ÿ ÿÿABCDÿÿÿ( 5ÿ ÿ( ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿE 5ÿF ÿ"ÿ #Gÿ7ÿ9ÿHÿ8"ÿ$ ÿ ÿ9ÿ' ÿ$ ÿ5 ÿ( ÿÿICÿ ÿ"ÿ 9)ÿ(ÿ ÿÿ ÿ5 ÿÿÿ5ÿÿÿ ÿ "# ÿ Pÿ%$&'QÿR ÿAAIÿÿÿ ÿ " # ÿ %ÿ ÿ5 ÿ( ÿÿÿ ÿ9ÿ) ÿ ÿSÿÿ ÿÿ"ÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿ ÿFÿ5ÿTÿÿ5 ÿ ÿÿ ÿ"ÿ ÿÿÿICÿ ÿ# Hÿÿ"ÿÿ Uÿ ÿ5ÿÿ ÿ ÿ5ÿ 5 ÿÿÿÿÿÿ( ÿÿÿ ÿ( " ÿ5ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ( ÿÿ ÿ # ÿ
VWXY`ÿbc`Ydÿefgÿhgiÿpqrsgtpgquÿvwÿxvqyquvyÿvsÿ`vqtÿ ggthpgsÿpyÿrifvyug fpfÿufgÿYVÿpyÿvqyptgspqrÿ fgufgsÿuvÿsgpgqygÿgsgÿ`vqtVÿuvpygsyÿsgÿtpyigtÿuÿ rstgqÿyfvÿqgsÿspyÿbsqgÿ`YVeY`fsgyÿup
$ÿ" ÿÿ5ÿ Uÿ ÿÿÿÿ"ÿÿÿ5 ÿ ÿ9)ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ#ÿAÿIDAC# ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ! ÿ " ÿ# $!ÿ%ÿÿ&#ÿ #ÿÿ' ÿ #ÿÿ ()0ÿ 1 ÿ! ÿ2ÿ&ÿÿ 34'ÿÿ ÿ& 5!1ÿÿ41 !ÿ#ÿÿÿÿÿ&&ÿ"2ÿÿ% 6 #"ÿ $!7ÿ8$ÿ #ÿÿ ÿÿ2ÿ&1ÿ ÿ"7ÿÿ ÿÿ #7ÿ8ÿ&ÿÿ##7
9ÿÿÿ7 7ÿ'#ÿ&& ÿ91ÿ2ÿ$ÿ &9 ÿ 34'@ÿA&Bÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ& $# 19&ÿÿ&&#&ÿ ÿ$ÿ 1& ÿ#ÿ 3&ÿ5!$ÿ1 #ÿÿ 34'7ÿ8ÿ#ÿÿ##7