Daily Mail and News Corp Settle Copied- Stories Dispute by Henry Mance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Daily Mail and News Corp settle copied- stories dispute By Henry Mance Does MailOnline copy Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, or vice versa? The world may never know. The two publishers have settled an Australian legal dispute over the alleged lifting of celebrity exclusives, with both sides claiming victory. The spat related to the business model of MailOnline, the world’s most visited English-language newspaper website, which like other digital publications relies on quickly replicating rivals’ stories. Martin Clarke, MailOnline’s publisher, said the matter had been resolved “very much to my satisfaction”. But News Corp Australia claimed that there had been “a change in the practices of Mail Online since we made our complaint”. The dispute emerged in June, when News Corp sent a cease-and-desist letter to MailOnline’s Australian operations, citing at least 10 instances where its stories had allegedly been copied. “We believe the Daily Mail Australia is breaching our copyright by lifting substantial slabs of original content from a large number of articles,” the company said. Daily Mail Australia, a joint venture between UK-listed Daily Mail and General Trust and Australia’s Nine Entertainment Company, hit back. It pointed to cases where News Corp’s publications had used its content, including photos of the cricketer Stuart Broad, without permission or attribution. Under Australian law, it is not an offence to reproduce news, providing the reproduction involves some input by a reporter. That means news sites such as MailOnline, Gawker and Huffington Post are unlikely to be breaching copyright as long as they do not simply copy-and-paste from other websites, or publish photos or videos without the permission of the copyright owners. Mr Clarke continued his offensive against News Corp’s drive for online profitability. In an interview with the Financial Times, he criticised News UK’s decision to pay more than £20m for rights to broadcast Premier League football highlights online. “If I want to watch the football, I’ll watch it on the telly,” he said. “We didn’t go for any of those rights.” MailOnline had depicted the legal dispute as an attempt by News Corp, which accounts for more than half of the print newspapers sold in Australia, to “throttle” its growth in the country, where it launched earlier this year. News Corp operates three of the country’s nine most popular news sites, while MailOnline is number 10, with 1.4m monthly unique visitors in February. MailOnline offers its content for free and earns revenue from advertising. Many of News Corp’s major titles, including The Australian, The Sun and The Wall Street Journal, operate paywalls. Robert Thomson, News Corp’s chief executive, has sustained the company’s emphasis on copyright, accusing Google of acting in a way that would bankrupt some European newspapers. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Media Scion James Murdoch Quits News Corp Board 1 August 2020
Media scion James Murdoch quits News Corp board 1 August 2020 Disney acquired most of the group's assets. James Murdoch, 47, has recently been critical of his father's business and its media coverage. In January, he denounced the climate change skepticism of some Murdoch media, citing coverage of the fires which devastated large parts of Australia. He has launched his own private holding company called Lupa Systems, which among other things has taken a stake in Vice Media. "We're grateful to James for his many years of James Murdoch, who has resigned from News Corp, has service to the company. We wish him the very best been critical of the business and its media coverage in his future endeavors," said Rupert Murdoch, executive chairman of News Corp and James's brother Lachlan Murdoch in a statement. Former 21st Century Fox chief executive James © 2020 AFP Murdoch, son of media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, has resigned from News Corp's board, according to a document released Friday by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A letter sent by James Murdoch to the board said the decision was due to "disagreements over certain editorial content published by the company's news outlets and certain other strategic decisions." News Corp owns the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, The Times and the Sun newspapers among others, but not Rupert Murdoch's Fox News network. James Murdoch was once seen as his father's successor, but Friday's move reinforces his disengagement from the family media empire, which grew from a newspaper group in Australia.
[Show full text]
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
[Show full text]
Why Can't the Daily Mail Eat Humble Pie Over MMR?
reBOOKS • CD ROMSviews • ART • WEBSITES • MEDIA • PERSONAL VIEWS • SOUNDINGS ful role of the media in the course of the of guilt over having had their children MMR controversy. immunised. It is true that the MMR-autism scare did Phillips is one of many journalists (by not start in the press. Both a reputable Lon- no means confined to the tabloids) who don teaching hospital and a prestigious have endorsed the anti-MMR campaign. medical journal allowed the scare to start. They have provided a voice for middle class Yet, once Wakefield decided to go public anxieties about environmental threats and Why can’t the Daily with his anti-MMR campaign, the media for the distrust of established sources of played a major part in promoting the scare. authority in science, medicine, and politics Mail eat humble pie Phillips’s response to the Cochrane study that have led some parents to reject MMR. follows the familiar themes of numerous Some journalists, writing as celebrity par- over MMR? anti-MMR articles over the years, including ents, have followed the principles of the several by Phillips herself. “journalism of attachment” popularised in recent military conflicts. This requires a he recent publication of a Cochrane Phillips’s article is scientifically flawed. high level of emotional engagement but no systematic review concluding that She seems to misunderstand the nature of a specialist knowledge of the subject (special- there is “no credible evidence” of a systematic review and to misinterpret any T criticism of studies of MMR safety, or any ist medical and scientific correspondents link between the measles, mumps, and have generally rejected the MMR-autism rubella (MMR) vaccine and either inflamma- expression of uncertainty about their link).
[Show full text]
Abstract a Case Study of Cross-Ownership Waivers
ABSTRACT A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-OWNERSHIP WAIVERS: FRAMING NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF RUPERT MURDOCH’S REQUESTS TO KEEP THE NEW YORK POST by Rachel L. Seeman Media ownership is an important regulatory issue that is enforced by the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC, Congress, court and public interest groups share varying viewpoints concerning what the ownership limits should be and whether companies should be granted a waiver to be excused from the rules. News Corporation is one media firm that has a history of seeking these waivers, particularly for the New York Post and television stations in same community. This study conducted a qualitative framing analysis of news articles from the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal to determine if the viewpoints expressed by the editorial boards were reflected in reports on News Corp.’s attempt to receive cross-ownership waivers. The analysis uncovered ten frames the newspapers used to assist in reporting the events and found that 80% of these frames did parallel the positions the paper’s editorial boards took concerning ownership waivers. A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-OWNERSHIP WAIVERS: FRAMING NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF RUPERT MURDOCH’S REQUESTS TO KEEP THE NEW YORK POST A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Communications by Rachel Leianne Seeman Miami University Oxford, OH 2009 Advisor: __________________________________ (Dr. Bruce Drushel) Reader: __________________________________ (Dr. Howard
[Show full text]
Dirty Power: Burnt Country 1 Greenpeace Australia Pacific Greenpeace Australia Pacific
How the fossil fuel industry, News Corp, and the Federal Government hijacked the Black Summer bushfires to prevent action on climate change Dirty Power: Burnt Country 1 Greenpeace Australia Pacific Greenpeace Australia Pacific Lead author Louis Brailsford Contributing authors Nikola Čašule Zachary Boren Tynan Hewes Edoardo Riario Sforza Design Olivia Louella Authorised by Kate Smolski, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, Sydney May 2020 www.greenpeace.org.au TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 6 2. The Black Summer bushfires 7 3. Deny, minimise, adapt: The response of the Morrison Government 9 Denial 9 Minimisation 10 Adaptation and resilience 11 4. Why disinformation benefits the fossil fuel industry 12 Business as usual 13 Protecting the coal industry 14 5. The influence of the fossil fuel lobby on government 16 6. Political donations and financial influence 19 7. News Corp’s disinformation campaign 21 News Corp and climate denialism 21 News Corp, the Federal Government and the fossil fuel industry 27 8. #ArsonEmergency: social media disinformation and the role of News Corp and the Federal Government 29 The facts 29 #ArsonEmergency 30 Explaining the persistence of #ArsonEmergency 33 Timeline: #ArsonEmergency, News Corp and the Federal Government 36 9. Case study – “He’s been brainwashed”: Attacking the experts 39 10. Case study – Matt Kean, the Liberal party minister who stepped out of line 41 11. Conclusions 44 End Notes 45 References 51 Dirty Power: Burnt Country 3 Greenpeace Australia Pacific EXECUTIVE SUMMARY stronger action to phase out fossil fuels, was aided by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp media empire, and a Australia’s 2019/20 Black coordinated campaign of social media disinformation.
[Show full text]
Moderation Guide
Moderation Guide Society of Editors www.societyofeditors.org 01 Moderation Guide Society of Editors www.societyofeditors.org Department for Communities and Local Government 01 Foreword Introduction Before the arrival of online news, the and threatening content is an issue of real C.P. Scott, Manchester Guardian editor from 1872 to 1929, writing for the 100th space available for content was limited and concern for many. That is why we funded anniversary of the paper and his 50th birthday in 1921, said a newspaper’s primary office newspaper editorials and comment pieces the Society of Editors with input and support was the gathering of news. were the preserve of the few. from the Press Complaints Commission to carry out research into current moderation “At the peril of its soul it must see that the supply is not tainted. Neither in what it gives, Today there really are no such physical of user-generated content and to produce nor in what it does not give, nor in the mode of presentation must the unclouded face restrictions and together with technological good practice guidance to help on-line of truth suffer wrong. Comment is free, but facts are sacred.” advances and social networking, a much moderators in the future. larger group of commentators now have This most famous quote of the longest serving editor of the newspaper we know today a voice on almost any topic. This opening The majority of online news outlets take as The Guardian, now provides the title of the comment section of the Guardian’s up of traditional media, with the advent of the issue of moderation seriously, not successful website.
[Show full text]
The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
[Show full text]
The Future of Public Service Broadcasting DMG Media Response to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee's Call
Written evidence submitted by DMG Media The Future of Public Service Broadcasting DMG Media response to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee’s call for evidence 1. This response is made on behalf of DMG Media, the publishers of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, MailOnline, Metro, Metro.co.uk, the ‘i’ and inews. It is being submitted because BBC online news competes for audience with our digital titles and we are concerned that funding changes could give the BBC an unfair advantage. 2. DMG Media is not a broadcaster, and public service broadcasters have by longstanding convention not published newspapers. Therefore, whilst over the decades our news titles and the BBC may have had political and cultural differences, they have not been commercial rivals. 3. However the coming of the digital age has changed that. The philosophical foundation of the BBC was that in return for public funding and access to scarce broadcast spectrum, it would develop then-new technology (radio and television) and use it to provide, in addition to education and entertainment, an impartial news service. The written word was not part of its remit. 4. The unlimited possibilities of the internet have destroyed the rationale of that arrangement. Satellite, cable, and now streaming have brought new competitors into the entertainment market, global players with vastly greater resources than the BBC. 5. The BBC is dependent for funding on the licence fee, over which successive governments have resolutely retained control, doubtless believing that a national broadcaster which has to regularly come to the government of the day with a begging bowl is more likely to be compliant.
[Show full text]
Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20
Ofcom’s Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20 Published 25 November 2020 Raising awarenessWelsh translation available: Adroddiad Blynyddol Ofcom ar y BBC of online harms Contents Overview .................................................................................................................................... 2 The ongoing impact of Covid-19 ............................................................................................... 6 Looking ahead .......................................................................................................................... 11 Performance assessment ......................................................................................................... 16 Public Purpose 1: News and current affairs ........................................................................ 24 Public Purpose 2: Supporting learning for people of all ages ............................................ 37 Public Purpose 3: Creative, high quality and distinctive output and services .................... 47 Public Purpose 4: Reflecting, representing and serving the UK’s diverse communities .... 60 The BBC’s impact on competition ............................................................................................ 83 The BBC’s content standards ................................................................................................... 89 Overview of our duties ............................................................................................................ 96 1 Overview This is our third
[Show full text]
Downloads of Technical Information
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Nuclear Spaces: Simulations of Nuclear Warfare in Film, by the Numbers, and on the Atomic Battlefield Donald J. Kinney Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NUCLEAR SPACES: SIMULATIONS OF NUCLEAR WARFARE IN FILM, BY THE NUMBERS, AND ON THE ATOMIC BATTLEFIELD By DONALD J KINNEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Donald J. Kinney defended this dissertation on October 15, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Ronald E. Doel Professor Directing Dissertation Joseph R. Hellweg University Representative Jonathan A. Grant Committee Member Kristine C. Harper Committee Member Guenter Kurt Piehler Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Morgan, Nala, Sebastian, Eliza, John, James, and Annette, who all took their turns on watch as I worked. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Kris Harper, Jonathan Grant, Kurt Piehler, and Joseph Hellweg. I would especially like to thank Ron Doel, without whom none of this would have been possible. It has been a very long road since that afternoon in Powell's City of Books, but Ron made certain that I did not despair. Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract..............................................................................................................................................................vii 1.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2016
2016 REA Group Limited Annual Report 2016 REA Group Annual Report REA Group is a market-leading digital media business specialising in property Contents 4 About us 6 Chairman’s message 8 CEO’s message 10 How we’ve performed 14 Australian highlights 16 Asian highlights 18 European highlights 19 North American highlights 20 Our latest innovations 22 Our people 24 Community partnerships & programs 28 Executive Leadership Team 30 Board of Directors 32 Directors’ Report 41 Auditor’s Independence Declaration 42 Remuneration Report 52 Consolidated Financial Statements 108 Directors’ Declaration 109 Independent Auditor’s Report 111 Historical results 113 Shareholder information 114 Corporate information Empowering people by making property simple, efficient & stress-free We're passionate about all things property and digital, that enthusiasm has now spread across the globe At REA Group, we strive to create a culture that supports our people and helps them reach their full potential About us 4 REA Group Annual Report 2016 REA Group Limited is a global digital advertising company specialising in property. Our ambition is to change the way the world experiences property. We do this by consistently evolving the way we connect with our global property network, which now spans four continents. A world-leading property this by developing digital experiences Our property related strategy will help resource for desktop and mobile devices. us continue to grow our audience We provide insights through our and connect with people interested REA Group is not your average rich data to inform those interested in areas of property other than buying, digital media company.
[Show full text]
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs.
[Show full text]