Biden Tells Ukraine's Leaders the U.S. Stands with Them

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biden Tells Ukraine's Leaders the U.S. Stands with Them INSIDE: l The rhetorical rumble with Russia – page 3 l Voices from Russian-annexed Crimea – page 4 l Our community: Rochester, Woonsocket – page 16 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXII No. 17 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 27, 2014 $1/$2 in Ukraine Biden tells Ukraine’s leaders the U.S. stands with them KYIV – Visiting Kyiv on April 21-22, U.S. you all hoped for two, five, 10, 15 years ago Vice-President Joe Biden told the people of to lay the groundwork for an even more Ukraine they “should have the right to united and more prosperous Ukraine.” choose their own future” and declared the Mr. Biden also touched on energy issues United States’ readiness to assist Ukraine, in his remarks to Ukrainian legislators. “As which he said faces “humiliating threats” you attempt to pursue energy security,” he and “very daunting problems,” in seizing a said, “there’s no reason why you cannot be chance to create national unity. energy secure. …It will take time. It takes “As you all know well, we have a signifi- some difficult decisions, but it’s collectively cant Ukrainian American population,” Mr. within your power and the power of Europe Biden told Ukraine’s national deputies. “We and the United States. And we stand ready stand with you. And it is not just a foreign to assist you in reaching that. Imagine policy judgment, it is a personal – it’s an where you’d be today if you were able to tell emotional commitment, as well, by millions Russia: Keep your gas. It would be a very of Americans.” different world you’d be facing today.” Mr. Biden also told his audiences in Kyiv Speaking that afternoon at a press con- that the U.S. stands ready to help Ukraine’s ference at the Cabinet of Ministers Club, Mr. economy but that that Ukraine must step Biden said of the country’s May 25 election: up efforts to root out abuses within its “This is a chance to make good on the aspi- political system and “fight the cancer of rations of the overwhelming majority of corruption.” Ukrainians east and west and every part of “We want to be your partner and friend,” this country. For a Ukraine that empowers U.S. Embassy Kyiv he told Ukrainian presidential candidates local governance and respects and protects Speaking on April 22, U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden said: “I came here to Kyiv to let you Mr. Prime Minister, and every Ukrainian know that the United States stands with and members of the Verkhovna Rada on different linguistic and cultural traditions, you and is working to support all Ukrainians in seeking a better future. Ukraine is the morning of April 22. but fundamentally holds together as a sin- and must remain one country from Lviv to Kharkiv down to the Black Sea – one Noting that the country is “facing such gle state – united and sovereign.” country, one united Ukraine.” unrest and uncertainty,” Mr. Biden said that He also stated: “We, the United States, “this is a second opportunity to make good stand with you and all the Ukrainian people independence. And at its most basic level, “No nation should threaten its neighbors on the original promise made by the on a Ukraine united. And I’ll say at the top it’s about restoring respect and dignity.” by massing troops along the border,” he Orange Revolution. This is a genuine we do not recognize – we do not recognize “No nation,” the vice-president said, “has continued. “We call on Russia to pull back opportunity to get right what is always dif- – Russia’s actions in the Crimea. But today, the right to simply grab land from another these forces. No nation should stoke insta- ficult to do the first time when coming out as I said, there are some trying to pull nation. No nation has that right. And we bility in its neighbor’s country. We call on from under the oppression or control of Ukraine apart. …There’s been a lot of talk will never recognize Russia’s illegal occupa- Russia to stop supporting men hiding another power.” Referring to the upcoming about geopolitics, about East and West. But tion of Crimea, and neither will the world, behind masks in unmarked uniforms, sow- presidential election, he added, “you have here in Ukraine, people know that it’s about as was demonstrated by the overwhelming ing unrest in eastern Ukraine. And we have an opportunity, a chance to bring about an something much more fundamental. It’s not vote that took place in the Security Council, era of reform and democratic renewal that about geopolitics; it’s about unity. It’s about in the General Assembly.” (Continued on page 15) Insurrections in eastern Ukraine seen as distinct from Euro-Maidan protest by Zenon Zawada the Euro-Maidan, a grassroots movement that drew support from a wide social spec- KYIV – The Russian establishment is trum encompassing all of Ukraine’s regions. going to great lengths to spin the current “It’s a parody of the Maidan,” said Petro armed conflicts in eastern Ukraine as a Oleshchuk, a political science lecturer at movement similar to the Euro-Maidan, Shevchenko National University in Kyiv. with the aim of exposing the Western “Even their collection of Maidan items isn’t world’s hypocrisy in supporting one pro- practical, but merely symbolic. For test while condemning the other. instance, the tires that the separatists have The pro-Russian fighters have mimicked shielded themselves with were used on the the Maidan in building barricades in front of Maidan to create a smokescreen against the captured state buildings, and setting up Berkut [special forces]. Yet they’re making stages and kitchens. They wear masks and barricades out of them because they know camouflage. But unlike the Euro-Maidan, that no one will truly attack them.” which resorted to firearms as a last resort, Among the three murdered this week by these fighters openly carry automatic weap- the pro-Russian militants in the Donetsk ons, using them to attack police stations and Oblast was Horlivka City Councilman military sites to acquire more arms. Volodymyr Rybak, who belonged to the Their particularly violent acts this week Batkivshchyna party and organized the – including the murder of a city council- city’s “For a United Ukraine” protests. His Voice of Donetsk man, kidnapping of foreign journalists and body and that of an unidentified man were The pro-Russian fighters in eastern Ukraine have mimicked the Euro-Maidan by police officers, and repeated calls for using tires to build their barricades, such as these surrounding the Donetsk Oblast found with indications of torture, reported Russian military intervention – have served State Administration. Using them for barricades, instead of creating a smokescreen, is to further discredit any comparisons with evidence they have no fear of being attacked, observers said. (Continued on page 9) 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 27, 2014 No. 17 ANALYSIS NDI: Ukraine on democratic path Relaunch of anti-terrorist operations kidnapped. OSCE Representative on KYIV – Ukraine’s acting President “I remain deeply concerned about the ongo- for May 25 presidential election Oleksandr Turchynov called for the ingFreedom negative of the pattern Media in Dunja relation Mijatović to journal said,- relaunch of anti-terrorist operations against Canadian minister of foreign affairs, and ists’ safety in Ukraine. …I call on all those Significant challenges remain pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine, citing Edward “Ted” Kaufman, former U.S. senator responsible to stop harassing and attacking KYIV – Citing the resurgence of civic the death of a politician from his party in the from Delaware. Other members were journalists and let them do their job. Simon pride and political engagement brought region. Mr. Turchynov said in a statement Matyas Eorsi, former member of Ostrovsky should be released immediately.” about by the Euro-Maidan demonstrations, that two “brutally tortured” bodies were Parliament from Hungary and former (RFE/RL, Organization for Security and the National Democratic Institute (NDI) found near the rebel-held city of Sloviansk member of the Parliamentary Assembly of Cooperation in Europe) said that “Ukraine has turned the corner on April 22. One was that of Volodymyr onto a decidedly democratic path” but still the Council of Europe; Nadia Diuk, vice- Rybak, a member of the Batkivshchyna Lavrov says Russia will respond faces an extraordinary set of challenges. president of programs for Europe, Eurasia, party who had been abducted the previous MOSCOW – Russian Foreign Affairs Those were among the findings of an Africa, and Latin America and the week. The president said Mr. Rybak had Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that Russia NDI pre-election mission that issued a Caribbean for the National Endowment for recently been abducted by “terrorists.” He will retaliate if Russian interests are threat- statement on April 11 after a week of Democracy; Andrew Bruce, executive direc- said, “These crimes are being carried out ened in Ukraine. In an interview with state- assessing preparations for the presidential, tor of Electoral Reform International with the full support and indulgence” of controlled RT television on April 23, Mr. parliamentary and local elections sched- Services; Bill Balan, vice-president of Russia. Mr. Turchynov said, “I call on the Lavrov said: “If we are attacked, we would uled for May 25. Those polls, it said, will be finance and administration and chief security agencies to relaunch and carry out certainly respond.” His comments came after the most important in Ukraine since it administrative officer at the University of effective anti-terrorist measures, with the Ukraine’s acting President Oleksandr gained independence from the Soviet Winnipeg; Laura Jewett, NDI regional direc- aim of protecting Ukrainian citizens in the Turchynov ordered the resumption of an Union in 1991.
Recommended publications
  • Uncorrected Transcript
    PUTIN-2012/03/07 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PUTIN’S REELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIA AND THE WORLD Washington, D.C. Wednesday, March 7, 2012 PARTICIPANTS: Introduction: FIONA HILL Senior Fellow and Director, Center on the United States and Europe The Brookings Institution Panelists: CLIFFORD GADDY Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution STEVEN PIFER Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution FIONA HILL Senior Fellow and Director, Center on the United States and Europe The Brookings Institution * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 PUTIN-2012/03/07 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MS. HILL: I’d just like to welcome everybody here today for our session on the Russian elections, and I’m a little nervous that nobody’s sitting at the front. Do you all know something that we don’t know? You know, talking about the subject can make one a little paranoid, so I’m a little confused as to why no one’s coming -- is it reserved? There’s no assigned seating, so if anybody would like to come down and sit at the front to make us feel less nervous, we’d be thrilled. Also, with faded eyesight, you know, we’ll be looking towards the back there to figure out who to engage in questions. I’m Fiona Hill, the director of the Center on the United States and Europe here at Brookings into which Russia falls. So, Russia is part of Europe as far as Brookings is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation of CE Countries in Response to Situation in Russian Federation and in Ukraine
    Cooperation o f C E c o u n t r i e s i n r e s p o n s e t o s i t u a t i o n i n Russian Federation and in Ukraine V4+ Cooperation of CE countries in response to situation in Russian Federation and in Ukraine P RAGUE STUDENT SUMMIT /XX/ V 4 + / I I I 1 Cooperation o f C E c o u n t r i e s i n r e s p o n s e t o s i t u a t i o n i n Russian Federation and in Ukraine Author: Vendula Kotyzová, Vojtěch Bahenský, Jakub Kufčák Imprimatur: Šimon Presser Graphics: Jan Hlaváček Model V4+ Published by Association for International Affairs for Prague Student Summit. © AMO 2015 Asociace pro mezinárodní otázky Žitná 27, 110 00 Praha 1 Tel./fax: +420 224 813 460, e-mail: [email protected] IČ: 65 99 95 33 www.amo.cz www.studentsummit.cz P RAGUE STUDENT SUMMIT /XX/ V 4 + / I I I 2 Cooperation o f C E c o u n t r i e s i n r e s p o n s e t o s i t u a t i o n i n Russian Federation and in Ukraine 1 Introduction The conflict in Ukraine that escalated into Russian annexation of Crimean peninsula influenced the whole world. Countries of Central and Eastern Europe are now living in uncertenity of what would happen next, if this apperent Russian expansion continued further.
    [Show full text]
  • CUWS Outreach Journal #1107
    USAF Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies (CUWS) Outreach Journal Issue No. 1107, 21 March 2014 Welcome to the CUWS Outreach Journal! As part of the CUWS’ mission to develop Air Force, DoD, and other USG leaders to advance the state of knowledge, policy, and practices within strategic defense issues involving nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, we offer the government and civilian community a source of contemporary discussions on unconventional weapons. These discussions include news articles, papers, and other information sources that address issues pertinent to the U.S. national security community. It is our hope that this information resources will help enhance the overall awareness of these important national security issues and lead to the further discussion of options for dealing with the potential use of unconventional weapons. The CUWS is seeking submissions for its annual General Charles A. Horner award, which honors the best original writing on issues relating to Air Force counter-WMD and nuclear enterprise operations. The deadline for submissions is March 31, 2014. For more information, please visit our web-site. The following news articles, papers, and other information sources do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the Air University, U.S. Air Force, or Department of Defense. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. FEATURED ITEM: “Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons”. By Amy F. Woolf, Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy; January 3, 2014. Published by Congressional Research Service; 39 pages. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/219954.pdf The FY2013 Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4310, Section 1037) indicates that it is the sense of Congress that “the United States should pursue negotiations with the Russian Federation aimed at the reduction of Russian deployed and nondeployed nonstrategic nuclear forces.” The United States and Russia have not included limits on these weapons in past arms control agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crimes in Crimea
    International Crimes in Crimea: An Assessment of Two and a Half Years of Russian Occupation SEPTEMBER 2016 Contents I. Introduction 6 A. Executive summary 6 B. The authors 7 C. Sources of information and methodology of documentation 7 II. Factual Background 8 A. A brief history of the Crimean Peninsula 8 B. Euromaidan 12 C. The invasion of Crimea 15 D. Two and a half years of occupation and the war in Donbas 23 III. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court 27 IV. Contextual elements of international crimes 28 A. War crimes 28 B. Crimes against humanity 34 V. Willful killing, murder and enforced disappearances 38 A. Overview 38 B. The law 38 C. Summary of the evidence 39 D. Documented cases 41 E. Analysis 45 F. Conclusion 45 VI. Torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 46 A. Overview 46 B. The law 46 C. Summary of the evidence 47 D. Documented cases of torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 50 E. Analysis 59 F. Conclusion 59 VII. Illegal detention 60 A. Overview 60 B. The law 60 C. Summary of the evidence 62 D. Documented cases of illegal detention 66 E. Analysis 87 F. Conclusion 87 VIII. Forced displacement 88 A. Overview 88 B. The law 88 C. Summary of evidence 90 D. Analysis 93 E. Conclusion 93 IX. Crimes against public, private and cultural property 94 A. Overview 94 B. The law 94 C. Summary of evidence 96 D. Documented cases 99 E. Analysis 110 F. Conclusion 110 X. Persecution and collective punishment 111 A. Overview 111 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Crimea
    OSCE UNITED NATIONS NAVY NAVY UNITED STATES STATES UNITED INTERNATIONAL LAW LAW INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HUMANITARIAN RUSSIA Issue 1 (23), 2021 GENEVA CONVENTION ANNEXATION CRIMEANDEOCCUPATION TATARS UKRAINE OCCUPATION OCCUPATION CRIMEAN PLATFORMC R RIGHTS IHUMAN M E A BLACK SEA UA: Ukraine Analytica · 1 (23), 2021 • CRIMEAN PLATFORM • TEMPORARY OCCUPATION • INTERNATIONAL REACTION 1 BOARD OF ADVISERS Dr. Dimitar Bechev (Bulgaria, Director of the European Policy Institute) Issue 1 (23), 2021 Dr. Iulian Chifu Analysis and Early Warning Center) (Romania, Director of the Conflict Crimea Amb., Dr. Sergiy Korsunsky (Ukraine, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentionary of Ukraine to Japan) Editors Dr. Igor Koval (Ukraine, Odesa City Council) Dr. Hanna Shelest Dr. Mykola Kapitonenko Marcel Röthig (Germany, Director of the Representation of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Ukraine) Publisher: Published by NGO “Promotion of Intercultural James Nixey (United Kingdom, Head of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House, the Cooperation” (Ukraine), Centre of International Royal Institute of International Affairs) of the Representation of the Friedrich Ebert Studies (Ukraine), with the financial support (Slovakia, Ambassador Foundation in Ukraine, the Black Sea Trust. Dr. Róbert Ondrejcsák Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Slovak Republic to the United Kingdom of Great Britain UA: Ukraine Analytica and Northern Ireland) analytical journal in English on International is the first Ukrainian Relations, Politics and Economics. The journal Amb.,
    [Show full text]
  • Crimea and the Kremlin: from Plan “A” to Plan “B”
    Crimea and the Kremlin: From Plan “A” to Plan “B” Translated by Arch Tait March 2015 This article is published in English by The Henry Jackson Society by arrangement with Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. CRIMEA AND THE KREMLIN: FROM PLAN “A” TO PLAN “B” 1 Reconstructing events in east Ukraine and the rationale behind them. On 15 March, Crimea marked the first anniversary of the referendum on whether it wanted to be incorporated as Part of Russia. Shortly before,Vladimir Putin signed a decree instituting a new national holiday: SPecial OPerations Forces Day. This is to be celebrated on 27 February, the day in 2014 when the “little green men” embarked on their oPeration to seize key facilities in Crimea. The day before the announcement, Russian television aired a film titled “Crimea: the Path Back to the Homeland”, in which Putin describes taking the decision to begin the oPeration to annex the Peninsula. For all that, certain details about the oPeration and the Russian president’s motives remain obscure. We could do worse than get the answer to the question of why Putin decided to seize Crimea from the horse’s mouth, from Putin’s own sPeeches. He had listed his grievances at some length in a sPeech in the Kremlin on 18 March 2014. Not for the first time, he blamed the United States for “destroying the world order” and, in his view, stage-managing a whole succession of “coloured” revolutions. His main comPlaint was about NATO’s eastward expansion, “moving uP military infrastructure to our borders.” Because of this, he argued, “we have every reason to believe that the notorious Policy of containment of Russia, Pursued in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, continues to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Changes in Electoral Systems: a Comparative Analysis of the Local Election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010
    STUDIA VOL. 36 POLITOLOGICZNE STUDIA I ANALIZY Olena Yatsunska The impact of changes in electoral systems: a comparative analysis of the local election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010 KEY WORDS: local government, local elections, proportional electoral system, majoritarian electoral system, mixed majoritarian-proportional electoral system, Ukraine STUDIA I ANALIZY Having gained independence in 1991 Ukraine, like most Central and East- ern European countries, faced the need for radical Constitutional reforms, with reorganization of local government figuring high in the agenda. Like other post-soviet countries, Ukraine had to decide on the starting point and like in the neighboring countries, democratic euphoria of the early 1990s got the upper hand: local authorities were elected on March 18, 1990, while the Law On Local People’s Deputies of Ukrainian SSR and Local Self-government was adopted by Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian SSR on December 7, 1990. Ukrain- ian Researchers in the field of local government and its reforms concur with the opinion that the present dissatisfactory state of that institution was con- ditioned by the first steps made by Ukrainian Politicians at the beginning of the ‘transition’ period. Without clear perspective of reform, during more than 20 years of Independence, Ukrainian local government has abided dozens of laws, sometimes rather contradictory and has survived more than 10 stages of restructuring. Evolution of election legislation in Ukraine is demonstrated by Table 1. The table shows that since 1994 three electoral systems have been tested in Ukraine: 1, Majoritarian, 2, Proportional except elections to village and settlement councils and 3, ‘Mixed’ system (50% Majoritarian+50% Proportional).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's March 2008 Presidential Election: Outcome and Implications
    Russia’s March 2008 Presidential Election: Outcome and Implications name redacted Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs March 13, 2008 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS22831 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Russia’s March 2008 Presidential Election: Outcome and Implications Summary This report discusses the campaign and results of Russia’s March 2, 2008, presidential election and implications for Russia and U.S. interests. Popular outgoing President Vladimir Putin endorsed his First Deputy Prime Minister, Dmitriy Medvedev, who easily won an election viewed by some observers as not free and fair. This report will not be updated. Related products include CRS Report RL33407, Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests, by (name redacted); and CRS Report RS22770, Russia’s December 2007 Legislative Election: Outcome and Implications, by (name redacted). For more background and prospects, see CRS Report RL34392, Russia’s 2008 Presidential Succession, by (name redacted). Congressional Research Service Russia’s March 2008 Presidential Election: Outcome and Implications Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 The Campaign.............................................................................................................................1 Results and Assessments .............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings
    Briefing Paper Released on: 31 March 2021 ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES IN THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA AND THE CITY OF SEVASTOPOL, UKRAINE, TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION KEY FINDINGS 1. Since the beginning of the occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, (“Crimea”) in 2014,1 OHCHR has documented 43 cases of enforced disappearances in Crimea; 2. These mostly took the form of abductions and kidnappings and the victims consist of 39 men and 4 women; 3. The first documented enforced disappearance took place on 3 March 2014 and the most recent on 23 May 2018; 4. Out of the 43 victims of enforced disappearances, 11 persons (all men) remain missing and one man remains in detention; 5. Alleged perpetrators comprised militia groups, such as the Crimean self-defense and Cossack groups; agents of the Russian Federal Security Service; and other law enforcement authorities, including the Crimean police. 6. Perpetrators have used torture and ill-treatment to force victims to self-incriminate or testify against others, as well as retaliation for their political affiliation or position; 7. No individual has been prosecuted in relation to any of the enforced disappearances, as well as torture and ill-treatment, documented by OHCHR. 1 For an overview of applicable bodies of international human rights law and international humanitarian law in Crimea, see OHCHR, “Situation of human rights in temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)” (hereinafter “OHCHR first report on Crimea”), paras. 36-45, available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/Crimea2014_2017_EN.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peninsula of Fear: Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea
    THE PENINSULA OF FEAR: CHRONICLE OF OCCUPATION AND VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CRIMEA Kyiv 2016 УДК 341.223.1+342.7.03](477.75)’’2014/2016’’=111 ББК 67.9(4Укр-6Крм)412 Composite authors: Sergiy Zayets (Regional Center for Human Rights), Olexandra Matviychuk (Center for Civil Liberties), Tetiana Pechonchyk (Human Rights Information Center), Darya Svyrydova (Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union), Olga Skrypnyk (Crimean Human Rights Group). The publication contains photographs from public sources, o7 cial websites of the state authorities of Ukraine, the Russian Federation and the occupation authorities, Crimean Field Mission for Human Rights, Crimean Human Rights Group, the online edition Crimea.Realities / Radio Svoboda and other media, court cases materials. ‘The Peninsula of Fear : Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea’ / Under the general editorship of O. Skrypnyk and T. Pechonchyk. Second edition, revised and corrected. – Kyiv: KBC, 2016. – 136 p. ISBN 978-966-2403-11-4 This publication presents a summary of factual documentation of international law violation emanating from the occupation of the autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine) by the Russian Federation military forces as well as of the human rights violations during February 2014 – February 2016. The publication is intended for the representatives of human rights organizations, civil activists, diplomatic missions, state authorities, as well as educational and research institutions. УДК 341.223.1+342.7.03](477.75)’’2014/2016’’=111 ББК 67.9(4Укр-6Крм)412 ISBN 978-966-2403-11-4 © S. Zayets, O. Matviychuk, T. Pechonchyk, D. Svyrydova, O. Skrypnyk, 2016 Contents Introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • NEE 2015 2 FINAL.Pdf
    ADVERTISEMENT NEW EASTERN EUROPE IS A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BETWEEN THREE POLISH PARTNERS The City of Gdańsk www.gdansk.pl A city with over a thousand years of history, Gdańsk has been a melting pot of cultures and ethnic groups. The air of tolerance and wealth built on trade has enabled culture, science, and the Arts to flourish in the city for centuries. Today, Gdańsk remains a key meeting place and major tourist attraction in Poland. While the city boasts historic sites of enchanting beauty, it also has a major historic and social importance. In addition to its 1000-year history, the city is the place where the Second World War broke out as well as the birthplace of Solidarność, the Solidarity movement, which led to the fall of Communism in Central and Eastern Europe. The European Solidarity Centre www.ecs.gda.pl The European Solidarity Centre is a multifunctional institution combining scientific, cultural and educational activities with a modern museum and archive, which documents freedom movements in the modern history of Poland and Europe. The Centre was established in Gdańsk on November 8th 2007. Its new building was opened in 2014 on the anniversary of the August Accords signed in Gdańsk between the worker’s union “Solidarność” and communist authorities in 1980. The Centre is meant to be an agora, a space for people and ideas that build and develop a civic society, a meeting place for people who hold the world’s future dear. The mission of the Centre is to commemorate, maintain and popularise the heritage and message of the Solidarity movement and the anti-communist democratic op- position in Poland and throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia-Georgia Conflict in August 2008
    = :88.&8*47,.&=43+1.(9=.3=:,:89=,**2a= 439*=9=&3)=251.(&9.438=+47=_ _=39*7*898= .2=.(-41= 5*(.&1.89=.3= :88.&3=&3)=:7&8.&3=++&.78= &7(-=-`=,**3= 43,7*88.43&1= *8*&7(-=*7;.(*= 18/1**= <<<_(78_,4;= -.0+2= =*5479=+47=43,7*88 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress :88.&8*47,.&= 43+1.(9=.3=:,:89=,**2a=439*=9=&3)= 251.(&9.438=+47=__= 39*7*898= = :22&7>= In the early 1990s, Georgia and its breakaway South Ossetia region had agreed to a Russian- mediated ceasefire that provided for Russian “peacekeepers” to be stationed in the region. Moscow extended citizenship and passports to most ethnic Ossetians. Simmering long-time tensions escalated on the evening of August 7, 2008, when South Ossetia and Georgia accused each other of launching intense artillery barrages against each other. Georgia claims that South Ossetian forces did not respond to a ceasefire appeal but intensified their shelling, “forcing” Georgia to send in troops. On August 8, Russia launched air attacks throughout Georgia and Russian troops engaged Georgian forces in South Ossetia. By the morning of August 10, Russian troops had occupied the bulk of South Ossetia, reached its border with the rest of Georgia, and were shelling areas across the border. Russian troops occupied several Georgian cities. Russian warships landed troops in Georgia’s breakaway Abkhazia region and took up positions off Georgia’s Black Sea coast. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, serving as the president of the European Union (EU), was instrumental in getting Georgia and Russia to agree to a peace plan on August 15-16.
    [Show full text]