DOCSLIB.ORG

Threads in the Human Tapestry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Threads in the Human Tapestry THREADS IN THE HUMAN TAPESTRY The Disaggregation of the API Identifier and the Importance of Having the NHOPI (Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander) Category in Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting PAPA OLA LŌKAHI Honolulu, Hawai‘i October 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 4 Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 4 Populations in the US Fabric............................................................................................................................ 5 Indigenous Peoples and the United States………………………………………………………………………….. 6 OMB 15 and the API Identifier……………………………………………………………………………………………….... 9 NHOPI Recognized……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...14 NHOPI: “Original Peoples of Hawai‘i, Guam, Samoa, and Other Pacific Islands”………………………………………..15 Implementation of Revised OMB standards on Racial and Ethnic Data…………………………………………………...19 Failure of Federal Agencies to fully Implement OMB Revised Standards………………………………………………....24 Impacts and On-going legacies of this Failure to fully Implement: 1. NHPOI populations have large data gaps in federal studies…………………………………………………… 31 2. NHOPI communities are not part of the national healthcare discussion……………………………………….32 3. NHOPI not represented in advisory groups/boards in federal data studies……………………………………33 4. Private sector not aware of NHOPI health issues………………………………………………………………...33 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...34 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….37 2 ATTACHMENT 1: NHOPI Populations – 2000 US Census/Other Census’……………………………............................46 ATTACHMENT 2: Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders “Who We Are”………………………………………………... 51 ATTACHMENT 3: Examples of non-compliance……………………………………………………………………….......... 61 3 Summary Since its inception, the United States government has never been consistent in determining who it is identifying or how it is identifying its nation of people. In 1976, the Executive Office of Management and Budget (OMB) created for the first time racial and ethnic categories for federal data collection and reporting; one of which was “Asian and Pacific Islander,” or “API.” This aggregated identifier brought together in one category multiple populations. In 1997, OMB split this API aggregation into two distinct groups; those of Asian descent (A) and those of Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander decent (NHOPI). The major reasons for disaggregation were: (1) The need for identifying health disparities and issues within Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations apart from Asian populations within the United States, and (2) The need for recognizing and protecting the unique relationship and political status that Native Hawaiians and certain Other Pacific Islanders have with the United States. Today, the implementation of this policy continues, sometimes with difficulty, both within the federal government and with private sector organizations and institutions which undertake and report on research involving populations within the United States. The former API category has continued to be used along with a newer “AAPI” (Asian American/Pacific Islander) identifier, yet neither category is recognized by OMB as an appropriate federal definer of a class of people or a racial grouping. The negative impacts of continued use of an API category are considerable both for Asian and for Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander populations. Background Historically, the reporting standards of racial and/or ethnic populations in the United States have never been constant nor have they been consistent yet, they have always reflected the political realities of the period. At the same time, this reporting has been essential for policymakers, statisticians, scholars, and the general public as all treat racial data as important basic facts, and as raw material for socioeconomic analysis and for the development of public policy. 4 In 1976, OMB established for the first time federal standards for the collection and reporting of racial and ethnic data through its issuance of “Statistical Policy Directive No. 15: Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting.” OMB was formerly the Bureau of the Budget and was established in the Executive Office of the President in 1939. Today, it “evaluates, formulates, and coordinates management procedures and program objectives within and among federal departments and agencies. It also controls the administration of the federal budget, while routinely providing the President with recommendations regarding budget proposals and relevant legislative enactments.” In explaining the need for consistency and standards for the collection and reporting of racial and ethnic data in its 1976 Directive No. 15, OMB noted: The United States Government has long collected statistics on race and ethnicity. Such data have been used to monitor changes in the social, demographic, health, and economic characteristics of various groups in our population. Federal data collections, through censuses, surveys, and administrative records, have provided an historical record of the Nation’s population diversity and its changing social attitudes, health status, and policy concerns. What needs to be added to this statement is that there are definite federal budget implications associated with how well or how poorly specific groups or populations are doing in terms of perceived American ‘norms’ built upon the gathering of statistics and data; and that there are important political ramifications to data collection stemming from the setting of Congressional districts and resulting representation to fulfilling treaty and other agreements made with domestic and foreign governments and with its own Indigenous peoples. In all instances, it can be said that federal data collection and reporting has been and continues to be tied to appropriation allocations and to developing and implementing federal socio-economic policies and law-making for its citizenry. Populations in the US Fabric: The United States prides itself as a multi-racial nation. It has been estimated that there are over 50 distinct racial and/or sub-racial and ethnic groups resident in the country. The dilemma for federal statisticians is how to count them. The US census has been the primary “tool” for counting people since its inception in 1790. While it always has been one based on race and racial categories, it has gone through a number of enumerations based upon the larger trends in the country at the time. Further, it has only been since 1960 that individuals have self-identified in the census. Before that, enumerators determined a person’s race by visual observation. While racial identifications have always been a part of the 5 census, the last fifty years have been shaped by civil rights legislation, the implementation of OMB Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 and its 1997 revision, and the lobbying efforts of organized groups. In addition to the census, other data sources have been developed over time by the United States, primarily to measure specific indicators usually related to socio-economic status. These tools have been especially helpful in terms of measuring advancements, or non-advancements, resulting from civil rights legislation and other federal laws and policies. Over the past twenty years, such studies have been particularly useful in defining health disparities and deficiencies in educational resources among different racial groups within the United States. In recent times, a major dilemma for federal statisticians has been on how best to define the multitudes of racial groups and ethnicities resident in the United States. In 1977, OMB issued its Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 which established standards for data collection and identified the major racial categories for data collection, analysis, and reporting: American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, and White. Twenty years later, in 1997, OMB revised these categories to include American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Afro-American or Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White and allowed the various federal agencies five years to implement any changes needed to implement this revision. While many have complied, implementation to date is not complete. Indigenous Peoples and the United States: Another force for data collection, analysis, and reporting has been at work in the United States. The federal government always has maintained a unique and special relationship with its indigenous peoples. Over the past twenty-five years, this relationship has become more focused and important as a result of a growing body of international law and the work of the United Nations focusing on Indigenous peoples’ issues and concerns. Federal data collection on American Indians has ebbed and flowed throughout time depending upon the political realities of the federal relationship. Prior to the 1860 census, American Indians who retained their tribal affiliations were not counted in the census as they were not considered American citizens. This changed with the 1870 census when some American Indians were counted; however, American citizenship for American Indians was not attained universally until 1924. Today, there are 561 federally-recognized American Indian tribes and Alaska Native Villages, but more than half of 6 the American Indian/Alaska Native population lives outside of these tribal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Community of Contrasts: Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in Orange County Addresses This Critical Challenge by Doing Two Things
    2014 A COMMUNITY Cyrus Chung Ying Tang Foundation OF CONTRASTS Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in Orange County ORANGE www.calendow.org COUNTY This report was made possible by the following sponsors: The Wallace H. Coulter Foundation, Cyrus Chung Ying Tang Foundation, Wells Fargo, and The California Endowment. The statements and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. CONTENTS ORGANIZATIONAL DESCRIPTIONS TECHNICAL NOTES Welcome 1 Introduction 2 Executive Summary 3 Map 5 Measuring the characteristics of racial and ethnic groups Demographics 6 Since 2000, the United States Census Bureau has allowed those responding to its questionnaires to report one or more Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Orange County Economic Contributions 9 racial or ethnic backgrounds. While this better reflects America’s diversity and improves data available on multiracial popula- The mission of Asian Americans Advancing Justice (“Advancing Civic Engagement 10 tions, it complicates the use of data on racial and ethnic groups. Justice”) is to promote a fair and equitable society for all by Immigration 12 working for civil and human rights and empowering Asian Language 14 Data on race are generally available from the Census Bureau in two forms, for those of a single racial background (referred Americans and Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPI) Education 16 to as “alone”) with multiracial people captured in an independent category, and for those of either single or multiple racial and other underserved communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chartbook on Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders
    Chartbook on Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY AND DISPARITIES REPORT This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. Suggested citation: National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2020. AHRQ Pub. No. 20-0043. National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Chartbook on Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov AHRQ Publication No. 20-0043 May 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report (QDR) is the product of collaboration among agencies across the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Many individuals guided and contributed to this effort. Without their magnanimous support, this chartbook would not have been possible. Specifically, we thank: Authors: • AHRQ: Barbara Barton, Celeste Torio, Bill Freeman, Brenda Harding, Erofile Gripiotis • SAMHSA: Victoria Chau • Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG): Robert Fornango, Paul Niemann, Michael Lichter, Cindy Strickland, Mitchell Keener, Fredericka Thompson Primary AHRQ Staff: Gopal Khanna, David Meyers, Jeff Brady, Francis Chesley, Erin Grace, Kamila Mistry, Celeste Torio, Karen Chaves, Barbara Barton, Bill Freeman, Erofile Gripiotis, Brenda Harding, Irim Azam, Tahleah Chappel, Doreen Bonnett. HHS Interagency Workgroup for the QDR: Irim Azam (AHRQ/CQuIPS), Girma Alemu (HRSA), Doreen Bonnett (AHRQ/OC), Deron Burton (CDC/DDID/NCHHSTP/OD), Victoria Chau (SAMHSA), Karen H. Chaves (AHRQ), Christine Lee (FDA), Deborah Duran (NIH/NIMHD), Ernest Moy (VA), Melissa Evans (CMS/CCSQ), Camille Fabiyi (AHRQ/OEREP), Darryl Gray (AHRQ/CQuIPS), Kirk Greenway (IHS/HQ), Sarah Heppner (HRSA), Edwin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders
    Wayne State University Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints WSU Press 10-9-2020 Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders Michael S. Spencer University of Washington Taurmini Fentress University of Washington Ammara Touch University of Washington Jessica Hernandez University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints Recommended Citation Spencer, Michael S.; Fentress, Taurmini; Touch, Ammara; and Hernandez, Jessica, "Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders" (2020). Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints. 176. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints/176 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WSU Press at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders Michael S. Spencer,1,2,* Taurmini Fentress,1 Ammara Touch,3,4 Jessica Hernandez5 1School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2Indigenous Wellness Research Institute (IWRI), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3College of the Arts & Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 4College of the Arts & Sciences, Department of American Ethnic Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington USA. 5School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. *Correspondence to: Mike Spencer, University of Washington School of Social Work, Box 354900, Seattle, Washington 98195-4900 USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Short Title: Environmental Justice and Pacific Islanders KEY WORDS: NATIVE HAWAIIAN, PACIFIC ISLANDERS, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE, SETTLER COLONIALISM.
    [Show full text]
  • Overtures to Chinese Highlight Nikita Talk
    T 7 U 1 8 0 A T , '■m S t ^bwinard’s ^IfoUHOw. 7 / f V ^ H ld S S will meet tomorrow a t 8 :0 Stndentfi Speak U. MursilRr ^ at tha home of Mrs. John CC Schools and eoM with ___ ___ . t v : nril, 160 ^ p o l S t The R«v. Jd To Toastmasters iwow a* nlghh ’I ^ II c t the Tbner of the Hartford Chanter, 20s. WlU 1M Lasalettea Fathers Burma Mls- Chew ’N Chat Toastmasters ia « h t Manobaiitor High Cftjr o f VUIogo Charm 7 pjn. at tile aion, win i^eak and riiow slides of inuaiotaM dunonatnOod woodwind - •v - r —— ....................... ■ ________- -- AtoMi m i r TcWroatli Oenter. the mlasicm. Club will “toast the teen-agen” at and read Matiumento in a iM their meeting Wednesday at •even atsmentary Mhodla ydater- . MANCRBSTBIL c o w , WEDNESDAY, YEERVART 17, IMS 1 AuxUIaxy wUI oiMt Airman Robert B. Sales, son of WUUe’t Restaurant With -the co- day. ^ „__ '1' , ________________________ t . /laaigM a t 7:80 at th* poat home. Mr. and Mrs. Edward Sales of 24 operatimi of k^iss Helen Estes of Hie tour was tha^finri carter St., is undergoing basic the Elnglish Department at Man­ pliumad by the townn a l e n w l ^ Dingwall, daugh- training at Lackland Air Force chester High School, a panel c t murio dTtMutmaDt to aoquitot tha, AltiiaUe C. Dingwall; Bsuse in Texsui. Before enlistment. students has been secured to give tddldran with tha woodwlnda, ^ Cased Airman Sales attsnded Howell the fliat ot aaverol to toaoh the u, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Americans
    A SNAPSHOT OF BEHAVI ORAL HEALTH ISSUES FOR AS IAN AMERICAN/ NATIVE HAWAIIAN/PACIFIC ISLANDER BOYS AND MEN: JUMPSTARTING AN OVERDUE CONVERSATION PURPOSE OF THE BRIEF address these issues need to be documented. Recognizing that this brief is not a comprehensive, As part of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health in-depth discussion of all the pertinent behavioral Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) efforts to health issues for each AANHPI subgroup, this brief promote behavioral health equity and to support represents a start to a much overdue conversation and President Obama’s “My Brother’s Keeper” Initiative action strategy. to address opportunity gaps for boys and young men of color, SAMHSA and the American Psychological WHO IS THIS BRIEF FOR? Association co-sponsored the “Pathways to Behavioral Health Equity: Addressing Disparities The primary audiences for this brief are policy­ Experienced by Men and Boys of Color” conference makers, clinicians and practitioners, researchers, in March 2015. The purpose of the conference was to national/regional and state leaders, community address the knowledge gap on behavioral health and leaders and consumers, and men and boys of color overall well-being for boys and young men of color. and their families and communities. Issues discussed included (a) gender and identity, (b) social determinants of health and well-being, (c) mental health, substance use, and sexual health, (d) WHO ARE ASIAN AMERICANS, misdiagnosis, treatment bias, and the lack of NATIVE HAWAIIANS, AND culturally competent screening instruments and PACIFIC ISLANDERS? treatment strategies in behavioral health, (d) the impact of profiling and stereotypes on behavior, and The AANHPI population consists of over 50 distinct (e) unique culturally based strategies and programs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of the Manihiki Language
    A Grammar of the Manihiki Language Aslak Vaag Olesen BA (Aarhus), MA (Copenhagen) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Linguistics School of Humanities and Social Science Faculty of Education and Arts University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia July 2020 I hereby certify that the work embodied in the thesis is my own work, conducted under normal supervision. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted, or is being examined, for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 and any approved embargo. Signature: Date: i Dedications To Norwegian adventurer Thor Heyerdahl, For igniting my life-long interest in Polynesia through his writings. To Professor William Wilson of the University of Hawai‘i, For suggesting to me to make the language of Manihiki and Rakahanga the object of this present work. To all the people of Manihiki and Rakahanga, For generously sharing their time and their knowledge with me, and for inviting me into their homes and treating me like an old friend. And to my partner, Gabrielle McGinnis, For being a constant support for me through all the ups and downs that I have encountered during my travels in the Pacific and during the writing of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Cultures of Southeast Asia: Language, Religion & Sociopolitical Issues
    Indigenous Cultures of Southeast Asia: Language, Religion & Sociopolitical Issues Eric Kendrick Georgia Perimeter College Indigenous vs. Minorities • Indigenous groups are minorities • Not all minorities are indigenous . e.g. Chinese in SE Asia Hmong, Hà Giang Province, Northeast Vietnam No Definitive Definition Exists • Historical ties to a particular territory • Cultural distinctiveness from other groups • Vulnerable to exploitation and marginalization by colonizers or dominant ethnic groups • The right to self-Identification Scope • 70+ countries • 300 - 350 million (6%) • 4,000 – 5,000 distinct peoples • Few dozen to several hundred thousand Some significantly exposed to colonizing or expansionary activities Others comparatively isolated from external or modern influence Post-Colonial Developments • Modern society has encroached on territory, diminishing languages & cultures • Many have become assimilated or urbanized Categories • Pastoralists – Herd animals for food, clothing, shelter, trade – Nomadic or Semi-nomadic – Common in Africa • Hunter-Gatherers – Game, fish, birds, insects, fruits – Medicine, stimulants, poison – Common in Amazon • Farmers – Small scale, nothing left for trade – Supplemented with hunting, fishing, gathering – Highlands of South America Commonly-known Examples • Native Americans (Canada – First Nations people) • Inuit (Eskimos) • Native Hawaiians • Maori (New Zealand) • Aborigines (Australia) Indigenous Peoples Southeast Asia Mainland SE Asia (Indochina) • Vietnam – 53 / 10 M (14%) • Cambodia – 24 / 197,000
    [Show full text]
  • PMB French Polynesia Finding
    Pacific Manuscripts Bureau titles documenting French Polynesia Compiled 21 October 2016 Short titles and some notes only. See PMB on-line database catalogue at http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/pambu/catalogue/ for information sheets and detailed reel lists of documents microfilmed. The keywords used to search the PMB on-line database for this finding aid included French Polynesia, Tahiti Austral, Gambier, Marquesas, Society and Tuamotu, Windward Islands, Leeward Islands, Papa’ete and Clipperton Island. Manuscript Titles AU PMB MS 23 Title: Miscellaneous papers - letters, notebooks, articles Date(s): 1878 - 1929 (Creation) Young James Lyle Extent and medium: 1 reel; 35mm microfilm Description: James Lyle Young (1849-1929) was born in Londonderry, Ireland, and went to Australia with his parents in the mid-1850's. After working in Australia as a station hand, Young, in 1870, went to Fiji where he was associated with a cotton-planting venture at Taveuni. In 1875, he left Fiji on a trading voyage to Samoa, and from May, 1876, to October, 1881, he worked as a trader in the Marshall, Mariana and Caroline Islands. In 1882, Young went to Tahiti to become manager of the Papeete trading store of Andrew Crawford & Co., of San Francisco. In 1888, he went into business in Tahiti on his own account. He was closely associated with the Pacific Islands for the rest of his life, as managing director of S.R. Maxwell & Co., of Tahiti, and owner of Henderson and Macfarlane Ltd., of Auckland. He became recognised as an authority on the life and culture of the region. Letters, notebooks, memoranda, articles, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Cultural Impact Assessment
    APPENDIX A CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Volume II: Final Environmental Assessment CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument Management Plan November, 2008 STATE OF HAWAI‘I DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES December 2008 Appendix A Volume II: Final Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................3 1.1 Project Background .....................................................................................................3 1.2 Scope of Work ..............................................................................................................4 1.3 Physical and Natural Setting.......................................................................................4 2.0 TRADITIONAL AND HISTORIC BACKGROUND ....................................................8 2.1 Cultural Setting ............................................................................................................8 2.2 Historical Period ........................................................................................................11 2.3 Contemporary Connections to the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands ....................12 2.4 Cultural Access for Native Hawaiian Practices ......................................................13 3.0 MONUMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................13 4.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and Its Impact on Hawaii's Racial Composition: 1971 to 2000
    18 The Open Demography Journal, 2009, 2, 18-35 Open Access Immigration and Its Impact on Hawaii’s Racial Composition: 1971 to 2000 Xuanning Fu* Department of Sociology, California State University, Frenso, Fresno, CA 93740, 1-559-27803020, USA Abstract: Hawaii is one of the most racially diverse places in the world, with many racial groups of relatively small sizes. The indigenous people, Hawaiians, have experienced a very high rate of intermarriage in the past few decades. Although high outmarriage is common among all groups, Hawaiians are unique in two characteristics. First, they do not have out- side sources to replenish their ethnic stock like most other groups in the islands. Secondly, outmarried Hawaiians tend to have higher socio-economic status than inmarried Hawaiians. Consequentially, the number of native Hawaiians will inevi- tably decrease and have lower family socio-economic status at the same time. This paper examines the theme that chang- ing definition of a Hawaiian is historically related to immigration of Pacific Islanders from many Pacific islands, and the trend continues today. The contemporary Pacific Islander immigrants who settled in Hawaiian from 1971 to 2000 made a small contribution to Hawaii’s racial profile, but they tend to have lower education and occupational status when com- pared to immigrants to come from other parts of the world. The study concludes that although Hawaiians were originated from immigration, the current trend will not significantly change their demographic and socio-economic status quo. IMMIGRATION AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACT ON A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE HAWAII ISLANDS AND HAWAII’S RACIAL COMPOSITION: 1971 to 2000 HAWAIIANS Hawaii is one of the most racially and ethnically diverse The Hawaii islands are located in the eastern half of the places in the world, marked not only by many different racial North Pacific, formed of seven major inhabited islands: and ethnic groups but also by a large scale of inter-group Oahu, Hawaii, Maui, Kauai, Molokai, Lanai, and Nihau.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian History: the Dispossession of Native Hawaiians' Identity, and Their Struggle for Sovereignty
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 6-2017 Hawaiian History: The Dispossession of Native Hawaiians' Identity, and Their Struggle for Sovereignty Megan Medeiros CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons, Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Medeiros, Megan, "Hawaiian History: The Dispossession of Native Hawaiians' Identity, and Their Struggle for Sovereignty" (2017). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 557. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/557 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HAWAIIAN HISTORY: THE DISPOSSESSION OF NATIVE HAWAIIANS’ IDENTITY, AND THEIR STRUGGLE FOR SOVEREIGNTY ______________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino _______________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Social Sciences and Globalization ______________________ by Megan Theresa Ualaniha’aha’a Medeiros June 2017 HAWAIIAN HISTORY: THE DISPOSSESSION OF NATIVE HAWAIIANS’ IDENTITY, AND THEIR STRUGGLE FOR SOVEREIGNTY ______________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Community of Contrasts: Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians And
    2015 A COMMUNITY OF CONTRASTS Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in the West ARIZONA HAWAI‘I LAS VEGAS OREGON SEATTLE CONTENTS Welcome 1 OREGON 46 Introduction 2 Demographics 47 Executive Summary Economic Contributions3 49 Civic Engagement 50 WEST REGION Immigration 5 51 Demographics 6 Language 52 ARIZONA 10 Education 53 Demographics 11 Income 54 Economic Contributions 13 Employment 55 Civic Engagement 14 Housing 56 Immigration 15 Health 57 Language 16 SEATTLE METRO AREA 58 Education 17 Demographics 59 Income 18 Economic Contributions 61 Employment 19 Civic Engagement 62 Housing 20 Immigration 63 Health 21 Language 64 HAWAI‘I 22 Education 65 Demographics 23 Income 66 Economic Contributions 25 Employment 67 Civic Engagement 26 Housing 68 Immigration 27 Health 69 Language 28 Policy Recommendations 70 Education 29 Glossary 73 Income 30 Appendix A: Population, Population Growth 74 Employment 31 Appendix B: Selected Population Characteristics 80 Housing 32 Technical Notes 85 Health 33 LAS VEGAS 34 METRO AREA Demographics 35 Economic Contributions 37 Civic Engagement 38 Immigration 39 Asian Americans Advancing Justice Language 40 Asian Americans Advancing Justice is a national affiliation of five leading organizations advocating for the civil and Education 41 human rights of Asian Americans and other underserved Income 42 communities to promote a fair and equitable society for all. Employment 43 Housing 44 Advancing Justice | AAJC (Washington, DC) Health 45 Advancing Justice | Asian Law Caucus (San Francisco) Advancing Justice | Atlanta Advancing Justice | Chicago Advancing Justice | Los Angeles All photos in this report were taken by M. Jamie Watson unless otherwise noted. Data design and layout were provided by GRAPHEK.
    [Show full text]