DOCSLIB.ORG

Humanity and Space

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Humanity and Space A Proposal for the Creation & Development of a Self-Sustained Lunar Colony An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by: Flah Ilyas Mykalin Jones Dan Pelgrift Weston Schlack Submitted to: Professor Mayer Humi Submitted on: August 17th, 2015 Abstract Detailed in this proposal is a virtually self-sufficient lunar colony. This paper addresses the design, maintenance, functions, and benefits it would bring to society. Construction and development of the colony are laid out over three distinct phases and the challenges of each phase are discussed. It is the belief of the authors that expansion into the solar system is necessary for the continued survival of humanity, and a lunar colony is the first major step in this expansion. 1 Executive Summary On July 20th, 1969, Neil Armstrong became the first human to set foot on the Moon. Eleven others have since tread upon its surface, with the last mission turning back to the earth on December 15th, 1972. After a hiatus over four decades, it is time for humanity to return. Despite appearing barren and desolate, our nearest neighbor has much to offer to humanity. To make proper use of these gifts however, a permanent human foothold must be established on the lunar surface. With this goal in mind, a plan has been outlined in this document for a lunar settlement spanning three distinct phases: Lunar Outpost, Lunar Station, and Lunar Colony, each with their own sets of goals and challenges that must be overcome if we are to use the moon to its fullest potential. The first phase consists of a small outpost that will house six astronauts. The outpost will be an inflatable structure located near the Moon’s south pole, on the edge of the Shackleton crater. Solar panels backed up by a nuclear reactor will provide power for the outpost. The main goals of Phase 1 are to establish a presence on the Moon and conduct research that will ease the transition into later phases. Phase 1 astronauts will also conduct surveys to determine the sites for future expansion, and construction will begin on infrastructure for Phase 2. Preparation for Phase 1 will begin two years before the arrival of the crew, and the phase will carry on for another two years after the crew’s arrival. Phase 2 comprises of the expansion of existing infrastructure, and construction of additional facilities. The polar settlement will be expanded and, more significantly, a permanent base will be established at the equator to accommodate for a crew which will number 300. This equatorial outpost will be built in a pit in Mare Tranquillitatis. In addition, small-scale mining will begin to obtain materials for in-situ resource utilization. These materials will undergo processing 2 and manufacturing to fabricate various components. The additional infrastructure will include a telescope constructed on the far side in order to monitor Near Earth Objects, and a maglev rail system which will provide efficient transportation between the polar and equatorial bases. A space elevator will also be built to facilitate the inexpensive transfer of cargo between LEO (Lower Earth Orbit) and the lunar surface, and a launch pad will be constructed at the equatorial base to provide a platform for space travel to and from the station. Phase 1 research will be used to build large- scale food growth facilities. The existing power systems will be expanded and research on additional systems begun. Phase 2 will last approximately ten years. Phase 3 will mainly be focused on expansion of the equatorial settlement, as well as the development of a permanent polar settlement located in a lava tube or excavated tunnel connected to the Shackleton crater. Lunar population and productivity will also be drastically increased. Lunar colonists will be able to live solely off of locally produced food, and will be able to manufacture virtually any basic item they need using local materials. By the end of this phase, the lunar base will transition from a purely self-sustaining goal, to one of further assistance in human exploration and spaceflight throughout the solar system. Rocket production will begin, facilities will expand, and a true lunar spaceport will come to fruition. Phase 3 has no well-defined end date, as it encompasses all future growth of the settlements across the lunar surface, but one of its major milestones will be to house 10,000 people by the end of ten years. A lunar colony offers extensive benefits to humanity. By colonizing the Moon, humanity will develop technology and gain experience that will prove essential in the colonization of other planets and improve technology on Earth. Useful metals are abundant in the lunar soil, and resources such as Helium-3 and lunar solar power have the potential to sustain the growing energy needs of the Earth. Furthermore, technologies developed to support the lunar colony will also 3 prove useful on Earth. The lunar spaceport will reduce the cost of visiting other planets and facilitate their colonization. Due to its many benefits to civilization on Earth as well as interplanetary colonization, a lunar colony is the logical first step in humanity’s expansion into the solar system. 4 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Phase 1: Lunar Outpost ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Goals: .................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Location: ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 Structure: ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 Construction: .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Life Support: .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Power: ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Crew Composition: ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Surface Transportation: ................................................................................................................................. 20 Backup Systems & Contingency Plans: ................................................................................................... 23 Schedule: ........................................................................................................................................................... 24 Flight Schedule: ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Costs: .................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Phase 2: Lunar Station ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Goals: .................................................................................................................................................................. 28 Equatorial Settlement: ................................................................................................................................... 29 Population & Facility Expansion: .............................................................................................................. 31 5 ISRU: .................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Lunar Mining: .................................................................................................................................................. 32 Lunar Materials Processing & Production:.............................................................................................. 34 Lunar Space Elevator: ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure

    Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure

    Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure A Cost Saving Approach to Human Spaceflight within a 15-year Constrained NASA Budget White Paper Submitted at the Open Invitation of the National Research Council 2013 Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure In Response to the National Research Council’s Study on the Benefits, Challenges and Ramifications of America’s Human Spaceflight Program. LiftPort Group presents a Cost-Effective Approach to Human Spaceflight within a 15-year Constrained NASA Budget. | MICHAEL LAINE – PRESIDENT, LIFTPORT GROUP | CHARLES RADLEY MSC., – ADVISOR, LIFTPORT GROUP | MARSHALL EUBANKS MSC., – ADVISOR, LIFTPORT GROUP | JEROME PEARSON MSC., – ADVISOR, LIFTPORT GROUP | PETER SWAN PHD., – ADVISOR, LIFTPORT GROUP | LEE GRAHAM (NASA – HIS VIEWS DO NOT REFLECT HIS EMPLOYER) | | 8 JULY 2013 | LIFTPORT GROUP | 1307 Dogwood Hill RD SW, Port Orchard, WA, 98366 | www.liftport.com | (862) 438-5383 | [email protected] LiftPort’s Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure: Affordable Response to Human Spaceflight What are the important benefits provided to the United States and other countries by human spaceflight endeavors? The ability to place humans in space is exciting to the public, and demonstrates the technological maturity and stature of each spacefaring nation. Such a visible and peaceful demonstration of cutting edge technology fosters foreign policy by showing Page | 1 strength without engaging in conflicti. Human spaceflight sparks the imagination and serves an instinctive need to explore. Astronauts are ambassadors for all of humanity in a very personal way. Men and women in space suits inspire people – of all cultures and demographics – to achieve excellence, to believe in a common cause and to pursue a noble goal.
  • Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle

    Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle

    Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle Mary Cummings Enlie Wang Cristin Smith Jessica Marquez Mark Duppen Stephane Essama Massachusetts Institute of Technology* Prepared For Draper Labs Award #: SC001-018 PI: Dava Newman HAL2005-04 September, 2005 http://halab.mit.edu e-mail: [email protected] *MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, MA 02139 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................ 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................... 2 2 H-SI BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION ........................................................ 3 2.1 APOLLO VS. LAV H-SI........................................................................................ 3 2.2 APOLLO VS. LUNAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 4 3 THE LAV CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE............................................................ 5 3.1 HS-I DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................ 5 3.2 THE CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE ............................................................................ 6 3.3 LANDING ZONE (LZ) DISPLAY............................................................................. 8 3.3.1 LZ Display Introduction.................................................................................
  • Planning a Mission to the Lunar South Pole

    Planning a Mission to the Lunar South Pole

    Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter: (Diviner) Audience Planning a Mission to Grades 9-10 the Lunar South Pole Time Recommended 1-2 hours AAAS STANDARDS Learning Objectives: • 12A/H1: Exhibit traits such as curiosity, honesty, open- • Learn about recent discoveries in lunar science. ness, and skepticism when making investigations, and value those traits in others. • Deduce information from various sources of scientific data. • 12E/H4: Insist that the key assumptions and reasoning in • Use critical thinking to compare and evaluate different datasets. any argument—whether one’s own or that of others—be • Participate in team-based decision-making. made explicit; analyze the arguments for flawed assump- • Use logical arguments and supporting information to justify decisions. tions, flawed reasoning, or both; and be critical of the claims if any flaws in the argument are found. • 4A/H3: Increasingly sophisticated technology is used Preparation: to learn about the universe. Visual, radio, and X-ray See teacher procedure for any details. telescopes collect information from across the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves; computers handle Background Information: data and complicated computations to interpret them; space probes send back data and materials from The Moon’s surface thermal environment is among the most extreme of any remote parts of the solar system; and accelerators give planetary body in the solar system. With no atmosphere to store heat or filter subatomic particles energies that simulate conditions in the Sun’s radiation, midday temperatures on the Moon’s surface can reach the stars and in the early history of the universe before 127°C (hotter than boiling water) whereas at night they can fall as low as stars formed.
  • Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study

    Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study

    Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study 2 April 2012 Prepared for the: Keck Institute for Space Studies California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California 1 2 Authors and Study Participants NAME Organization E-Mail Signature John Brophy Co-Leader / NASA JPL / Caltech [email protected] Fred Culick Co-Leader / Caltech [email protected] Co -Leader / The Planetary Louis Friedman [email protected] Society Carlton Allen NASA JSC [email protected] David Baughman Naval Postgraduate School [email protected] NASA ARC/Carnegie Mellon Julie Bellerose [email protected] University Bruce Betts The Planetary Society [email protected] Mike Brown Caltech [email protected] Michael Busch UCLA [email protected] John Casani NASA JPL [email protected] Marcello Coradini ESA [email protected] John Dankanich NASA GRC [email protected] Paul Dimotakis Caltech [email protected] Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Martin Elvis [email protected] Astrophysics Ian Garrick-Bethel UCSC [email protected] Bob Gershman NASA JPL [email protected] Florida Institute for Human and Tom Jones [email protected] Machine Cognition Damon Landau NASA JPL [email protected] Chris Lewicki Arkyd Astronautics [email protected] John Lewis University of Arizona [email protected] Pedro Llanos USC [email protected] Mark Lupisella NASA GSFC [email protected] Dan Mazanek NASA LaRC [email protected] Prakhar Mehrotra Caltech [email protected]
  • Executive Summary

    Executive Summary

    The Boston University Astronomy Department Annual Report 2010 Chair: James Jackson Administrator: Laura Wipf 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Faculty and Staff 5 Teaching 6 Undergraduate Programs 6 Observatory and Facilities 8 Graduate Program 9 Colloquium Series 10 Alumni Affairs/Public Outreach 10 Research 11 Funding 12 Future Plans/Departmental Needs 13 APPENDIX A: Faculty, Staff, and Graduate Students 16 APPENDIX B: 2009/2010 Astronomy Graduates 18 APPENDIX C: Seminar Series 19 APPENDIX D: Sponsored Project Funding 21 APPENDIX E: Accounts Income Expenditures 25 APPENDIX F: Publications 27 Cover photo: An ultraviolet image of Saturn taken by Prof. John Clarke and his group using the Hubble Space Telescope. The oval ribbons toward the top and bottom of the image shows the location of auroral activity near Saturn’s poles. This activity is analogous to Earth’s aurora borealis and aurora australis, the so-called “northern” and “southern lights,” and is caused by energetic particles from the sun trapped in Saturn’s magnetic field. 3 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY associates authored or co-authored a total of 204 refereed, scholarly papers in the disciplines’ most The Department of Astronomy teaches science to prestigious journals. hundreds of non-science majors from throughout the university, and runs one of the largest astronomy degree The funding of the Astronomy Department, the Center programs in the country. Research within the for Space Physics, and the Institute for Astrophysical Astronomy Department is thriving, and we retain our Research was changed this past year. In previous years, strong commitment to teaching and service. only the research centers received research funding, but last year the Department received a portion of this The Department graduated a class of twelve research funding based on grant activity by its faculty.
  • Vysoké Učení Technické V Brně Brno University of Technology

    Vysoké Učení Technické V Brně Brno University of Technology

    VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V BRNĚ BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY FAKULTA STAVEBNÍ FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING ÚSTAV TECHNOLOGIE STAVEBNÍCH HMOT A DÍLCŮ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS VLIV VLASTNOSTÍ VSTUPNÍCH MATERIÁLŮ NA KVALITU ARCHITEKTONICKÝCH BETONŮ INFLUENCE OF INPUT MATERIALS FOR QUALITY ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCE DIPLOMA THESIS AUTOR PRÁCE Bc. Veronika Ondryášová AUTHOR VEDOUCÍ PRÁCE prof. Ing. RUDOLF HELA, CSc. SUPERVISOR BRNO 2018 1 2 3 Abstrakt Diplomová práce se zaměřuje na problematiku vlivu vlastností vstupních surovin pro výrobu kvalitních povrchů architektonických betonů. V úvodní části je popsána definice architektonického betonu a také výhody a nevýhody jeho realizace. V dalších kapitolách jsou uvedeny charakteristiky, dávkování či chemické složení vstupních materiálů. Kromě návrhu receptury je důležitým parametrem pro vytvoření kvalitního povrchu betonu zhutňování, precizní uložení do bednění a následné ošetřování povrchu. Popsány jsou také jednotlivé druhy architektonických betonů, jejich způsob vyrábění s uvedenými příklady na konkrétních realizovaných stavbách. V praktické části byly navrženy 4 receptury, kde se měnil druh nebo dávkování vstupních surovin. Při tvorbě receptur byl důraz kladen především na minimální segregaci čerstvého betonu a omezení vzniku pórů na povrchu ztvrdlého betonu. Klíčová slova Architektonický beton, vstupní suroviny, bednění, separační prostředky, cement, přísady, pigment. Abstract This diploma thesis focuses on the influence of properties of feedstocks for the production of quality surfaces of architectural concrete. The introductory part describes the definition of architectural concrete with the advantages and disadvantages of its implementation. In the following chapters, the characteristics, the dosage or the chemical composition of the input materials are given. Besides the design of the mixture, important parameters for the creation of a quality surface of concrete are compaction, precise placement in formwork and subsequent treatment of the surface.
  • Integrated Lunar Transportation System

    Integrated Lunar Transportation System

    Integrated Lunar Transportation System Jerome Pearson1, John C. Oldson2, Eugene M. Levin3, and Harry Wykes4 Star Technology and Research, Inc., Mount Pleasant, SC, 29466 An integrated transportation system is proposed from the lunar poles to Earth orbit, using solar-powered electric vehicles on lunar tramways, highways, and a lunar space elevator. The system could transport large amounts of lunar resources to Earth orbit for construction, radiation shielding, and propellant depots, and could supply lunar equatorial, polar, and mining bases with manufactured items. We present a system for lunar surface transport using “cars, trucks, and trains,” and the infrastructure of “roads, highways, and tramways,” connecting with the lunar space elevator for transport to Earth orbit. The Apollo Lunar Rovers demonstrated a battery- powered range of nearly 50 kilometers, but they also uncovered the problems of lunar dust. For building dustless highways, it appears particularly attractive to create paved roads by using microwaves to sinter lunar dust into a hard surface. For tramways, tall towers can support high- strength ribbons that carry cable cars over the lunar craters; the ribbon might even be fabricated from lunar materials. We address the power and energy storage requirements for lunar transportation vehicles, the design and effectiveness of lunar tramways, and the materials requirements for the support ribbons of lunar tramways and lunar space elevators. 1. Introduction NASA is implementing a plan for a return to the Moon, which will build on and expand the capabilities demonstrated during the Apollo landings. The plan includes long-duration lunar stays, lunar outposts and bases, and exploitation of lunar resources on the Moon and in Earth orbit1.
  • LRO Makes a Temperature Map of the Lunar South Pole 42

    LRO Makes a Temperature Map of the Lunar South Pole 42

    LRO Makes a Temperature Map of the Lunar South Pole 42 The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has recently created the first surface temperature map of the south polar region of the moon using date taken between September and October, 2009 when south polar temperatures were close to their annual maximum values. The colorized map shows the locations of several intensely cold impact craters that are potential cold traps for water ice as well as a range of other icy compounds commonly observed in comets. The approximate maximum temperatures at which these compounds would be frozen in place for more than a billion years is shown on the scale to the right. The LCROSS spacecraft was targeted to impact one of the coldest of these craters, and many of these compounds were observed in the ejecta plume. (Courtesy: UCLA/NASA/JPL) Problem 1 - The width of this map is 500 km. What are the diameters of Crater A (Shackleton) and Crater B (Amundsen) in kilometers? Problem 2 - In which colored areas might an astronaut expect to find conditions cold enough to recover all of the elements and molecules indicated in the vertical temperature scale to the right? Problem 3 - The Shackleton Crater (Crater A) is cold enough to trap water and methanol. From Problem 1, and assuming that the thickness of the water deposit is 100 meters, and occupies 10% of the volume of the circular crater, how many cubic meters of water-ice might be present? Space Math http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Answer Key 42 Problem 1 - The width of this map is 500 km.
  • Pathways to Colonization David V

    Pathways to Colonization David V

    Pathways To Colonization David V. Smitherman, Jr. NASA, Marshall Space F’light Center, Mail CoLFDO2, Huntsville, AL 35812,256-961-7585, Abstract. The steps required for space colonization are many to grow fiom our current 3-person International Space Station,now under construction, to an inhstmcture that can support hundreds and eventually thousands of people in space. This paper will summarize the author’s fmdings fiom numerous studies and workshops on related subjects and identify some of the critical next steps toward space colonization. Findings will be drawn from the author’s previous work on space colony design, space infirastructure workshops, and various studies that addressed space policy. In cmclusion, this paper will note that siBnifcant progress has been made on space facility construction through the International Space Station program, and that si&icant efforts are needed in the development of new reusable Earth to Orbit transportation systems. The next key steps will include reusable in space transportation systems supported by in space propellant depots, the continued development of inflatable habitat and space elevator technologies, and the resolution of policy issues that will establish a future vision for space development A PATH TO SPACE COLONIZATION In 1993, as part of the author’s duties as a space program planner at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, a lengthy timeline was begun to determine the approximate length of time it might take for humans to eventually leave this solar system and travel to the stars. The thought was that we would soon discover a blue planet around another star and would eventually seek to send a colony to explore and expand our presence in this galaxy.
  • Sampling the SPA Basin Some Considerations Based on the Apollo Experience

    Sampling the SPA Basin Some Considerations Based on the Apollo Experience

    Sampling the SPA Basin Some Considerations Based on the Apollo Experience Paul D. Spudis Applied Physics Laboratory Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture February 27- March 2, 2007 How do you best sample the Moon? Samples without context have limited value Bulk planet properties, inventory of compositions Context requires either geologic field work or a simple regional setting Robotic missions tend to provide less context than human field study cf. Luna 20 and Apollo 16 Types of Exploratory Targets Reconnaissance Geologically simple sites where a “grab sample” of rocks and regolith can address and solve scientific issues Example: youngest mare lava flow, impact melt floor of fresh crater, regional pyroclastics Field Study Complex, multi-unit sites having a protracted evolution. Require human interaction, sampling, mapping, re-visiting field sites Examples: basin ejecta blanket, Aristarchus plateau, crater central peaks See Ryder et al., 1989, EOS, v. 70, n. 47, p. 1495; 1505-1520 Apollo Highlands Sampling Apollo 14 – Fra Mauro Sent to sample Fra Mauro Fm (Imbrium ejecta) Returned complex breccias; basaltic, KREEP-rich Which samples are Imbrium basin primary ejecta? Apollo 15 – Hadley-Apennines Sample front (deep Imbrium rim material) Anorthosite, KREEP basalts, mafic impact melts Which samples represent Imbrium basin melt? Apollo 16 – Descartes Sent to sample highland volcanic rocks Anorthositic debris, breccias, some mafic melts (VHA) Basin-related? If so, which ones? Apollo 17 – Taurus-Littrow Sample
  • A New Hope for International Space

    A New Hope for International Space

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Seton Hall University Libraries A NEW HOPE FOR INTERNATIONAL SPACE LAW: INCORPORATING NINETEENTH CENTURY FIRST POSSESSION PRINCIPLES INTO THE 1967 SPACE TREATY FOR THE COLONIZATION OF OUTER SPACE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Brandon C. Gruner∗ INTRODUCTION Legend has it that a friend once asked Mark Twain what he should invest in, and the good-humored author responded “Buy land; they’ve stopped making it.”1 The author’s advice was given more than 100 years ago and it still makes good sense. If a resource is scarce, it is almost always going to become more valuable.2 It is ∗ J.D. Candidate, 2005, Seton Hall University School of Law; B.A. Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa, History, 1999, New York University: College of Arts and Science. I would like to thank my parents, Robert and Maria Gruner, for their unwavering support throughout my education, and Paula A. Franzese, the Peter W. Rodino Professor of Law at Seton Hall Law School, for her invaluable knowledge and guidance in writing this Comment. 1 A search of the Lexis and Westlaw databases, as well as the World Wide Web, demonstrates that hundreds of newspapers and Web sites have attributed this quote or some similar version to Mark Twain. See, e.g., Clinton J. Fynes, “Ambassadorial Role” Leads Ian to Property, COURIER-MAIL, Oct. 12, 1990 (relaying the story of Mark Twain advising his friend to “Buy land, they’re not making any more of it.”); Tom Fegely, Lack of Action on Tag Fees Pinches Gamelands Purchases, Maintenance, MORNING CALL (Allentown, PA), Sept.
  • Armorhab: Design Reference Architecture (DRA) for Human

    Armorhab: Design Reference Architecture (DRA) for Human

    Copyright © 2016 by Dark Sea Industries LLC and the University of New Mexico. Published by The Mars Society with permission ArmorHab: Design Reference Architecture (DRA) for human habitation in deep space Peter Vorobieff Professor and Assistant Chair, Assistant Chair of Facilities, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131 Phone: (505) 277-8347 email: [email protected] Affiliation: University of New Mexico Craig Davidson Administrator 4808 Downey NE Albuquerque, NM 87109 Phone: 505-720-2321 email: [email protected] Affiliation: Dark Sea Industries LLC Dr. Mahmoud Reda Taha, Peng Professor and Chair, Department of Civil Engineering University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Office: (505) 277-1258, Cell: (505) 385-8930, Fax (505) 277-1988 http://civil.unm.edu/faculty-staff/faculty-profiles/mahmoud-taha.html www.unm.edu/~mrtaha/index.htm Affiliation: University of New Mexico Christos Christodoulou Associate Dean for Research Distinguished Professor, Electrical & Computer Engineering University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 Tel: (505) 277-6580 www.ece.unm.edu/faculty/cgc www.cosmiac.org Affiliation: University of New Mexico Anil K. Prinja Professor and Chair Department of Nuclear Engineering University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-1070 -1- Copyright © 2016 by Dark Sea Industries LLC and the University of New Mexico. Published by The Mars Society with permission Phone: (505)-277-4600, Fax: (505)-277-5433 [email protected] Affiliation: University of New Mexico Svetlana V. Poroseva Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131 Phone: 1(505) 277-1493, Fax: 1(505) 277-1571 email: poroseva at unm.edu Affiliation: University of New Mexico Mehran Tehrani Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131 Phone: 1(505) 277-1493, Fax: 1(505) 277-1571 email: [email protected] Affiliation: University of New Mexico David T.