MISTAKES WERE MADE (BUT NOT BY ME): WHY WE JUSTIFY FOOLISH BELIEFS, BAD DECISIONS, AND HURTFUL ACTS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

Carol Tavris,University Emeritus | 400 pages | 20 Oct 2015 | Mariner Books | 9780544574786 | English | United States Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts PDF Book Hurts and grievances in both parties have probably been building for some time. Once again, we see what we expect to see. In an effort to convince ourselves that the more desirable belief is the correct one, we will selectively focus on evidence supporting the more desirable belief and deny, ignore, or minimize evidence supporting the less desirable belief confirmation bias. But just because all men are mortal, it does not follow that all mortals are men, and it certainly does not follow that all men are Socrates. Yet brain scientists have uncovered details every business leader, parent, and teacher should know—like the need for physical activity … More. Basically, we can have experiences that we think are real, especially in the past, yet they never happened. And while individual scientists can be recalcitrant, the discipline as a whole is self-correcting, and moves on. The answer is exactly the way the rest of us do. Their citations of clinical works also brings up the interesting possibility that mindfulness-based interventions may be most I've been a longtime fan of both authors especially Tavris , so my expectations were pleasantly met. More videos The theory is that we need to overcome the that emerges when our actions conflict with our self-image or beliefs. Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson weave a slowly accelerating narrative of the power of cognitive dissonance in our lives, one that grows ever closer to home. These ubiquitous feats of mental gymnastics give rise to various appalling truths, one of which is best described by research psychologist John Kihlstrom. Structurally speaking, the book is very simple. For example, maybe a friend asked for a favor and you said no. They give just enough details that, if you're well versed in probability or logic, you can see a million ways that the study they just mentioned could easily be flawed into being meaningless or not generalizable. That there have been a network of lines that intersected and by a series of coincidences they have ended up here. In the tradition of The Wisdom of Crowds and Predictably Irrational comes Being Wrong , an illuminating exploration of what it means to be in error and why homo sapiens tend to tacitly assume or loudl… More. That's why the catharsis hypothesis is wrong. Sadly humans are hardwired with many biases that makes them fallible creatures This is a well written, snappy book that addresses an important issue, best described by the book's title and subtitle: "Mistakes Were Made but not by me : Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. A review in O, The Oprah Magazine praised the book for "the scientific evidence it provides and the charm of its down-to-earth, commonsensical tone". It was in fact both these things, but it was also far, far more depressing than I had expected. You don't particularly like the process but, as you want to be a part of this social group - you continue to participate in it. Elliot Aronson. Who started it, and when? A delightfully unsparing look into what your brain is doing behind your back. What is so insidious about the phrase which Clinton even joked about using it so much is that it is a complete avoidance of responsibility. Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts Writer

Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Want to Read saving…. We might even change our minds before our brains freeze our thoughts into consistent patterns. Shelves: behavioural-economics , . Shelves: university , policy-studies , psychology , social-psychology. As much as I read, there are few books that are enlightening, educational, and entertaining enough for me to rate them so highly. You get hi to take one step at a time, and self-justification will do the rest. Carol Tavris and Elliot Aron Mistakes Were Made is a tour through the different ways in which cognitive dissonance motivates otherwise normal, good people to do wretched things. Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort we feel when confronted with new information which contradicts our most prized beliefs, including the belief that we are intelligent, moral people; this leads us to deny or to justify our mistakes. First, what good can be served by cognitive dissonance? To illustrative these concepts, the authors give an abundance of examples to attempt to justify their arguments, but the examples are all basically identical: The person does bad thing; they think "I'm a good person, I couldn't have done a bad thing"; they rationalize their bad thing as being either good, not that bad, or unavoidable; when confronted with challenging evidence, they double down. Issues include: moral lapses e. Refresh and try again. It was such a great experience and trip for me to read such a wonderful and well written socio psychological book. In the tradition of The Wisdom of Crowds and Predictably Irrational comes Being Wrong , an illuminating exploration of what it means to be in error and why homo sapiens tend to tacitly assume or loudl… More. However, it also gets us into trouble. No one wants to know that WE are the cause of the problem, just like no one really wants to know that I made a mistake, not someone else. When I first heard about this experiment remember, we are talking about events that have all taken place in a span of slightly more than half an hour I was shocked at what this experiment implied about our justice system. Also, the work by cognitive psychologists like Kahneman and Tversky could have spoken to key points as well. Why is the Mona Lisa the most famous painting in the world? So we reduce cognitive dissonance in selecting thoughts which make the achievement or possession seem more valuable. Shelving menu. The section of this book on police interrogation methods should be made compulsory reading. But most of the center sections of the book--which thankfully were relatively free of politics I found endlessly fascinating. Download as PDF Printable version. Other Editions Basically the reasoning parts of our brain shut down when confronted with "dissonant" information, and the emotion circuits light up. Without some outside confirming source, we cannot trust our memories too much. There are some tips for the reader on ways they can try to manage cognitive dissonance in themselves, but such tips are also few in number. Keen, practical eye-opening read. This book has a protagonist , well ,i think it's more of an antagonist to us named : cognitive dissonance i am so in love with this character hhhhh "Mistakes Were Made But Not By Me" discusses all SORTS of lengths human being may go in order to reduce cognitive dissonance. About Carol Tavris. If not, than hide the sharp objects and designate a trusted friend to be at the ready to talk you down when it hits you how hopelessly self delusional all us humans actually is. It started with Iraq had pile of weapon of mass destruction but at the end of event there was no such thing still we try to justified the event with other matter such as stability in Middle East democracy In this book we see the the trail of self-justification through the territories of family, memory, therapy, law, prejudice, conflict, and war. The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki. It says the same basic thing at this book, but in a much more compelling and informative way. Fine—but most of us learn to count to ten and find alternatives to beating the other guy with a cudgel. Apr 09, Susan S. Cognitive psychologists consider stereotypes to be energy-saving devices that allow us to make efficient decisions on the basis of past experience; help us quickly process new information and retrieve memories; make sense of real differences between groups; and predict, often with considerable accuracy, how others will behave or how they think. I don't have time to go through all of the useful purposes that these cognitive processes serve, but here's a few: seeing ourselves as good people allows us to achieve more than people who are depressed and who have a more realistic perception of themselvesand applying patterns from old situations to new ones helps us to adapt to novelty and change more effectively. That wouldn't be a problem if they hadn't already spent a chapter bagging on therapists for having pet theories without looking at evidence that would contradict the theory. Once again, we see what we expect to see. This is one of those books that every time you put it down you have to run and find someone to tell what you just read. And the answer is yes we can! This book offers a fascinating explanation of self- justification — how it works, the damage it can cause, and how we can overcome it. Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts Reviews

Unfortunately, the authors bias came through very strongly in several of the examples used, and this distracts from the points the authors are attempting to make. Other Editions The cost that I'm referring to, is the naked experience of the pain of realizing that we are in fact human after all. When she isn't writing or lecturing, she can be found walking the trails of the Santa Monica mountains with her border collie, Sophie. Encountering the material in this book is very growth engendering. Cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias. Can we do better? Hence, the authors suggest that it is possible to remain committed to a religion, political party, or partner, yet understand that "it is not disloyal to disagree with actions or policies" that one believes are inappropriate, misguided, or immoral. Nor would most of us wish to live without passions or convictions, which give our lives meaning and color, energy and hope. Why is it so hard to change our minds when we think we are right? At its core, therefore, science is a form of arrogance control. Later, he feels some dissonance about what he did. When confidence and convictions are unleavened by humility, by an acceptance of fallibility, people can easily cross the line from healthy self-assurance to arrogance. Categories : non-fiction books Books about cognition Books about social psychology Books about bias Cognitive biases English-language books. Tavris did back up her claims about self- justification with some psychological research that sounded like it was peer-reviewed, I guess , but it was pretty sparse like 1 study per chapter if thatas opposed t Ultimately, I think that Tavris's conclusions about self-justification are probably correct, but her argument was flawed. Error rating book. Overcoming our natural tendencies to self-justify. The books speaks of these barriers, but sticks to its purpose of illustrating the theory. How cognitive dissonance works? They reframe the psychobabble as "self-justification" as the root of these conflicts and ongoing interpersonal difficulties. Combined with the culture's famous amnesia for anything that happened more than a month ago, this attitude means that people treat mistakes like hot potatoes, eager to get rid of them as fast as possible, even if they have to toss them in someone else's lap. That being said. So you ain't perfect but better than the most, right? Somewhere between my ambition and my ideals, I lost my ethical compass. When someone makes a claim and is presented with evidence to the contrary, rather than deny the evidence or modify their original claim, they explain it away. Published May 7th by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt first published Plus, she never really discussed the full context of the studies she cited, nor did she ever give any qualifications for the research or her own conclusions. Redirected from Mistakes were made but not by me. In Words or Less: It's easy to find fault in others, but difficult to see our own mistakes. Confirmation bias causes us to emphasize evidence which supports our beliefs and discredit facts which do not. I highly recommend it to anyone with an interest in psychology. Smokers in the s didn't understand the link between smoking and lung cancer. Renowned social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson take a compelling look into how the brain is wired for self-justification. Trivia About Mistakes Were Mad There are also families to consider, you admit the mistake, you could lose your job and there will be no college education for your kids. They have come to believe their own stories. It would mean he had made a colossal mistake. The overarching principles being examined are those of cognitive dissonance and self-justification. Whether eating, taking drugs, engaging in sex, or doing good deeds, the pursuit of pleasure i…. Wel I'm so depressed. Imagine just imagine living in a degree wrap around lie in which we falsely perceive ourselves as heroic victims to our own needless and profound detriment let the finger pointing begin. And we have confirmation bias, the reason it is so hard to change our minds when we have made a firm decision. May 11, Diana Nahirna rated it it was amazing. Each side has drifted so far down opposing sides of the pyramid that they aren't even using the same rule book anymore. The authors describe a "dissonance theory" of self-justification.

Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts Read Online

We wouldn't even consider doing such a terrible thing as cheating". I found the secti If you don't know what cognitive dissonance is, this is a great introduction. Backed by much research, this very insightful book explains how we all are capable of self deception, why we do it, why it is harmful, and how to overcome the very human mechanism of justifying our foolish beliefs, improper actions, poor decisions, and hurtful acts, and more importantly how to keep small things from escalating to disastrous proportions. Biases in perception, even the automatic activation of stereotypes are easier to get people to believe than trying to show them how every decision or experience we have is colored by the process of making ourselves appear consistent. The boo The title of the book gives the impression that it's a self-help book. Children under five have trouble differentiating between things they have heard and things they have actually experienced; in adulthood, we tend to forget details as years go by, so we wind up with a related problem of being unable to distinguish reality from our fantasized or chosen narratives. Written by two social psychologists and based on years of research, it provides a fascinating overview of cognitive dissonance , and how it applies to prejudice, memory, law, marriage, and war. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. As I said, all of these examples are abstractly identical. Not a leaf stirred; not a sound obtruded upon great Nature's meditation [ Aug 05, Aasem Bakhshi rated it really liked it Shelves: psychology. Because our victims deserved what they got, we hate them even more than we did before we harmed them, which in turn makes us inflict even more pain on them. Videotape all parental interrogations of their teenagers? The studies used in the book are sound and the authors take a wonderfully critically approach to everything they present. This book is relentless. How cognitive dissonance works? Nov 30, Jagadish rated it it was amazing. When we began working on this book, the poster boy for "tenacious clinging to a discredited belief" was George W. For instance, why do innocent people confess to crimes? I guess the biggest thing that was missing, for me, was more detail of when we don't give in to self-justification in order to avoid dissonance. When we began working on this book, the poster boy for "tenacious clinging to a discredited belief" was George W. Instead of admitting that we were wrong, we justify our actions even more strongly. We need to recognize our cognitive dissonance and listen to the message. Self-justification is a useful and even essential way for humans to protect their ego and mental health, but it can get pretty out of whack. It's just that normal human cognition is very prone to making certain kinds of errors, and religious memes propagate very easil As someone interested in the psychology of religion, it's always interesting to me how cognitive weaknesses play a role in establishing and maintaining religious beliefs. Books by Carol Tavris. I found the section on how easily children can be persuaded to have memories of things that didn't really happen both fascinating and disturbing. Bad Science by Ben Goldacre. A review in O, The Oprah Magazine praised the book for "the scientific evidence it provides and the charm of its down-to-earth, commonsensical tone". If there's only one thing I'll take from this book, it's that we need to be aware of dissonance, expect it, and try to understand it—especially within ourselves—if we have any chance of overcoming it. Basically, we can have experiences that we think are real, especially in the past, yet they never happened. Here's my list of gripes: 1 The book relied much too heavily on anecdotal evidence to prove its points. Goodreads Librari Readers also enjoyed. This far-reaching BOOK tackles irrational prejudices, false memories, misjudgement as a psychotherapist, prosecuting the wrong individual, blaming one's spouse the part of repressed memory therapy of rape victimise was eye opening for me as how easy for as to follow : Cognitive dissonance Confirmation bias I read in the book "thinking fast and slow " that knowing this biases dose not stop you form doing it even for the experts in this felid but it can make you stop your self and question why you think or act this way, and that is about it what you can do!! In reality, we are all highly hypocritical in countless ways, but as the authors show over and over again, this is much easier to detect in others than in ourselves. There is nothing more irritating to me than reading pages about a problem and then getting to the end and realizing the author offered no real solutions but a ton of biased opinions. Oz didn't reckon with the power of self-justification: We are good people. Why can we see hypo… More. A good example is false memories. My understanding of psychology was fairly limited, but Freudian, Jungian, Behaviourist and god knows what other —isms all seemed to me to depend too much on a foundation that seemed much too arbitrary. The cognition that I am a sensible, competent person is dissonant with the cognition that I went through a painful procedure to achieve something - say, joining a group that turned out to be boring and worthless. However, it also gets us into trouble. Highly recommended. Denial and Population. However, self-justification allows him to explain — to others, but especially himself — the difference between his professed convictions and his actions. Cognitive dissonance and hedonic bias. We humans are geared to stick to our figurative guns no matter what. These people were then quizzed for half an hour on as many details as they could remember from the poster.

https://files8.webydo.com/9583739/UploadedFiles/0F748001-AE1B-9284-A593-2E9803F9BAB3.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9584638/UploadedFiles/3C32F02A-227F-1E65-5921-AC5D8FCEB386.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583729/UploadedFiles/AB5C5CBE-8F64-9736-729E-4B2D5D3E5A95.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583198/UploadedFiles/A8B8548E-DE3D-57BC-E1C6-B4C190FB44BD.pdf