DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify MISTAKES WERE MADE (BUT NOT BY ME): WHY WE JUSTIFY FOOLISH BELIEFS, BAD DECISIONS, AND HURTFUL ACTS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Carol Tavris,University Emeritus Elliot Aronson | 400 pages | 20 Oct 2015 | Mariner Books | 9780544574786 | English | United States Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts PDF Book Hurts and grievances in both parties have probably been building for some time. Once again, we see what we expect to see. In an effort to convince ourselves that the more desirable belief is the correct one, we will selectively focus on evidence supporting the more desirable belief and deny, ignore, or minimize evidence supporting the less desirable belief confirmation bias. But just because all men are mortal, it does not follow that all mortals are men, and it certainly does not follow that all men are Socrates. Yet brain scientists have uncovered details every business leader, parent, and teacher should know—like the need for physical activity … More. Basically, we can have experiences that we think are real, especially in the past, yet they never happened. And while individual scientists can be recalcitrant, the discipline as a whole is self-correcting, and moves on. The answer is exactly the way the rest of us do. Their citations of clinical works also brings up the interesting possibility that mindfulness-based interventions may be most I've been a longtime fan of both authors especially Tavris , so my expectations were pleasantly met. More videos The theory is that we need to overcome the cognitive dissonance that emerges when our actions conflict with our self-image or beliefs. Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson weave a slowly accelerating narrative of the power of cognitive dissonance in our lives, one that grows ever closer to home. These ubiquitous feats of mental gymnastics give rise to various appalling truths, one of which is best described by research psychologist John Kihlstrom. Structurally speaking, the book is very simple. For example, maybe a friend asked for a favor and you said no. They give just enough details that, if you're well versed in probability or logic, you can see a million ways that the study they just mentioned could easily be flawed into being meaningless or not generalizable. That there have been a network of lines that intersected and by a series of coincidences they have ended up here. In the tradition of The Wisdom of Crowds and Predictably Irrational comes Being Wrong , an illuminating exploration of what it means to be in error and why homo sapiens tend to tacitly assume or loudl… More. That's why the catharsis hypothesis is wrong. Sadly humans are hardwired with many biases that makes them fallible creatures This is a well written, snappy book that addresses an important issue, best described by the book's title and subtitle: "Mistakes Were Made but not by me : Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. A review in O, The Oprah Magazine praised the book for "the scientific evidence it provides and the charm of its down-to-earth, commonsensical tone". It was in fact both these things, but it was also far, far more depressing than I had expected. You don't particularly like the process but, as you want to be a part of this social group - you continue to participate in it. Elliot Aronson. Who started it, and when? A delightfully unsparing look into what your brain is doing behind your back. What is so insidious about the phrase which Clinton even joked about using it so much is that it is a complete avoidance of responsibility. Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts Writer Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Want to Read saving…. We might even change our minds before our brains freeze our thoughts into consistent patterns. Shelves: behavioural-economics , psychology. Shelves: university , policy-studies , psychology , social-psychology. As much as I read, there are few books that are enlightening, educational, and entertaining enough for me to rate them so highly. You get hi to take one step at a time, and self-justification will do the rest. Carol Tavris and Elliot Aron Mistakes Were Made is a tour through the different ways in which cognitive dissonance motivates otherwise normal, good people to do wretched things. Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort we feel when confronted with new information which contradicts our most prized beliefs, including the belief that we are intelligent, moral people; this leads us to deny or to justify our mistakes. First, what good can be served by cognitive dissonance? To illustrative these concepts, the authors give an abundance of examples to attempt to justify their arguments, but the examples are all basically identical: The person does bad thing; they think "I'm a good person, I couldn't have done a bad thing"; they rationalize their bad thing as being either good, not that bad, or unavoidable; when confronted with challenging evidence, they double down. Issues include: moral lapses e. Refresh and try again. It was such a great experience and trip for me to read such a wonderful and well written socio psychological book. In the tradition of The Wisdom of Crowds and Predictably Irrational comes Being Wrong , an illuminating exploration of what it means to be in error and why homo sapiens tend to tacitly assume or loudl… More. However, it also gets us into trouble. No one wants to know that WE are the cause of the problem, just like no one really wants to know that I made a mistake, not someone else. When I first heard about this experiment remember, we are talking about events that have all taken place in a span of slightly more than half an hour I was shocked at what this experiment implied about our justice system. Also, the work by cognitive psychologists like Kahneman and Tversky could have spoken to key points as well. Why is the Mona Lisa the most famous painting in the world? So we reduce cognitive dissonance in selecting thoughts which make the achievement or possession seem more valuable. Shelving menu. The section of this book on police interrogation methods should be made compulsory reading. But most of the center sections of the book--which thankfully were relatively free of politics I found endlessly fascinating. Download as PDF Printable version. Other Editions Basically the reasoning parts of our brain shut down when confronted with "dissonant" information, and the emotion circuits light up. Without some outside confirming source, we cannot trust our memories too much. There are some tips for the reader on ways they can try to manage cognitive dissonance in themselves, but such tips are also few in number. Keen, practical eye-opening read. This book has a protagonist , well ,i think it's more of an antagonist to us named : cognitive dissonance i am so in love with this character hhhhh "Mistakes Were Made But Not By Me" discusses all SORTS of lengths human being may go in order to reduce cognitive dissonance. About Carol Tavris. If not, than hide the sharp objects and designate a trusted friend to be at the ready to talk you down when it hits you how hopelessly self delusional all us humans actually is. It started with Iraq had pile of weapon of mass destruction but at the end of event there was no such thing still we try to justified the event with other matter such as stability in Middle East democracy In this book we see the the trail of self-justification through the territories of family, memory, therapy, law, prejudice, conflict, and war. The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki. It says the same basic thing at this book, but in a much more compelling and informative way. Fine—but most of us learn to count to ten and find alternatives to beating the other guy with a cudgel. Apr 09, Susan S. Cognitive psychologists consider stereotypes to be energy-saving devices that allow us to make efficient decisions on the basis of past experience; help us quickly process new information and retrieve memories; make sense of real differences between groups; and predict, often with considerable accuracy, how others will behave or how they think. I don't have time to go through all of the useful purposes that these cognitive processes serve, but here's a few: seeing ourselves as good people allows us to achieve more than people who are depressed and who have a more realistic perception of themselvesand applying patterns from old situations to new ones helps us to adapt to novelty and change more effectively. That wouldn't be a problem if they hadn't already spent a chapter bagging on therapists for having pet theories without looking at evidence that would contradict the theory. Once again, we see what we expect to see. This is one of those books that every time you put it down you have to run and find someone to tell what you just read. And the answer is yes we can! This book offers a fascinating explanation of self- justification — how it works, the damage it can cause, and how we can overcome it. Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts Reviews Unfortunately, the authors bias came through very strongly in several of the examples used, and this distracts from the points the authors are attempting to make. Other Editions The cost that I'm referring to, is the naked experience of the pain of realizing that we are in fact human after all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • False-Memory Stories
    Telling Incest: Narratives of Dangerous Remembering from Stein to Sapphire Janice Doane and Devon Hodges http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=10780 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. Chapter 5 The Science of Memory False-Memory Stories False Memory Syndrome Foundation members, largely those who have been accused of child abuse and expert witnesses on their behalf, have compelling reasons to insist that repressed memories of abuse be veri‹ed by clear and con- vincing empirical evidence, precisely the kind of evidence often lacking in incestuous abuse cases.1 While there are cases where a child with venereal dis- ease or a bleeding vagina is admitted to an emergency room and evidence obtained of abuse, signs of molestation may not be at all obvious. Adults have been mistakenly charged with abuse as a result of misreadings of physical evi- dence, resulting, for example, from incorrect assumptions about what “nor- mal” genitals and hymens are supposed to look like (Nathan and Snedeker, 180–81). And children enjoined to silence may long delay reports of abuse, with the result that physical marks of molestation, should they exist, would be healed by the time accusations are made. Without damning physical evidence, charges of incestuous abuse are hard to prove. If the memory wars re›ect deep ambivalence about the declining fortunes of patriarchal authority, they are sus- tained by problems with collecting incontrovertible evidence of sexual abuse, whether to vindicate accusers or the accused. What is debated are less tangible archives of the past. As we have seen, proponents of recovered memory focus on psychological processes, such as repression and dissociation, that long impede the recollection of sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Deception
    Self-deception In a great book “The Mind of the Market: Compassionate Apes, Competitive Humans, and Other Tales from Evolutionary Economics”, the author, Michael Shermer, writes on cognitive dissonance. “In December 1954, the psychologist Leon Festinger and his colleaguesnoticed this newspaper headline: PROPHECY FROM PLANET CLARION CALL TO CITY: FLEE THAT FLOOD.A Chicago housewife, MarionKeech, reported that she had received messages from the planet Clarion telling her that the world would end in a great flood sometime before dawn on December 21, 1954. If she and her followers gathered together at midnight, however, a mother ship would arrive just in time to whisk them away to safety. Festinger immediately saw an opportunity, not to save himself, but to study the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance, the mental tension created when a person holds two conflicting thoughts simultaneously. “Suppose an individual believes something with his whole heart,” Festinger said. “Suppose further that he has a commitment to this belief, that he has taken irrevocable actions because of it; finally, suppose that he is presented with evidence, unequivocal and undeniable evidence, that his belief is wrong: what will happen? The individual will frequently emerge, not only unshaken, but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting other people to his view.” Many of Keech’s followershad quit their jobs, left their spouses, and given away their possessions. Festinger predicted that these individuals with the strongest behavioral commitment would be the least likely to admit their error when the prophecy failed and instead rationalize a positive outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Marita Sturken Source: Social Text, No
    The Remembering of Forgetting: Recovered Memory and the Question of Experience Author(s): Marita Sturken Source: Social Text, No. 57 (Winter, 1998), pp. 103-125 Published by: Duke University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/466883 . Accessed: 22/01/2011 20:18 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=duke. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Duke University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Text. http://www.jstor.org The Remembering of Forgetting RECOVERED MEMORY AND THE QUESTION OF EXPERIENCE Recovered memory syndrome is a defining aspect of American culture in Marita Sturken the late twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Dissonance Theory Teaches Us About Cheating, Justice, Memory, Psychotherapy, Science, and the Rest of Life by Carol Tavris & Elliot Aronson
    Self-Justification in Public and Private Spheres: What Cognitive Dissonance Theory Teaches Us about Cheating, Justice, Memory, Psychotherapy, Science, and the Rest of Life by Carol Tavris & Elliot Aronson Social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson are authors of Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why we Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts (Harcourt, 2007). Both have written widely used textbooks and general-interest books in psychology. Dr. Aronson is professor emeritus at the University of California, Santa Cruz. his year is the 50th anniversary of Leon Festinger’s powerful little book, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Fifty years! How Tmany of our field’s theories have remained as potent as this one, generating so much research, let alone been the source of a question on Jeopardy? To our knowledge, not even intermittent reinforcement and the Müller-Lyer illusion have turned up on Jeopardy! Festinger (1957) defined cognitive dissonance as a state of ten- sion that occurs whenever a person holds two cognitions (ideas, attitudes, opinions) that are psychologically inconsistent, such as “Smoking is a dumb thing to do because it could kill me” and “I smoke two packs a day.” It was not only a cognitive theory but a motivational one. Dissonance produces mental discomfort, believing themselves to be competent, moral, smart, and kind, a state that is as unpleasant as hunger, and people don’t rest their efforts at reducing dissonance will be designed to preserve easy until they find a way to reduce it. The most direct way for a their positive self-images—even when that perpetuates behav- smoker to reduce dissonance is by quitting.
    [Show full text]
  • O Que É O Cepticismo? Respostas Simples Para Algumas Questões Frequentes
    O que é o Cepticismo? Respostas Simples Para Algumas Questões Frequentes Adaptado de: The Media Guide to Skepticism Objectivo: Providenciar um guia claro e de fácil leitura sobre o ponto-de-vista “céptico” subscrito por muitos que podem chamar-se a si mesmos de cépticos ou pensadores críticos; para distinguir o cepticismo prático do uso popular da frase “eu sou céptico” e daqueles que afirmam ser “cépticos” de alguma conclusão científica bem-estabelecida (como as alterações climáticas). O que é o cepticismo? O cepticismo é uma abordagem usada para avaliar alegações que enfatiza as provas e aplica as ferramentas da ciência. O cepticismo é mais frequentemente aplicado a alegações extraordinárias – aquelas que contrariam a visão consensual actual. O processo céptico considera as provas obtidas por observação sistemática e pela razão. A conclusão a que se chega no fim deste processo céptico é provisória porque podem surgir posteriormente provas adicionais ou melhores que apontem para outra explicação mais adequada. Exemplo: O Sr. X diz-nos que um novo comprimido melhorou bastante a sua memória. Esta alegação, se for verdade, é importante e extraordinária. Desta forma, seria apropriado aplicar o cepticismo à mesma. Nós quereríamos ver as provas de que a sua memória melhorou e que o comprimido foi responsável por isso. Nós consideramos também explicações alternativas que possam explicar por que o Sr. X diria que o novo comprimido melhora a sua memória: ele pode estar enganado, pode estar a atravessar um período menos stressante, ele quer sentir que gastou o seu dinheiro nos comprimidos de forma sensata, ele foi pago para promover os comprimidos, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • By Discipline for Tavris and Aaronson's Mistakes Were Made
    Index by discipline for Tavris and Aaronson’s Mistakes Were Made American Government, Political Science, and History Abramoff, Jack, 45 Bush, George W. Iraq War, 2-3, 235 Cheney, Dick, 40 Clinton, Bill, adultery, 5 Dean, John; Nixon, Watergate, 6-7 DeLay, Tom; congressman, 45 Gingrich, Newt, adultery 5 Haldeman, Bob; Watergate, Nixon Administration, 34-35 Johnson, Lyndon; Vietnam War, 3, 7 Iranian hostage crisis, 187-188, 190-191 Kissinger, Henry; Nixon Administration, 1, 3 Liddy, G. Gordon; Watergate, Nixon Administration, 35 Magruder, Jeb Stuart; Watergate, Nixon Administration, 34-36 Mitchell, John; Watergate, Nixon Administration, 35 Party bias, 43 Scalia, Antonin; Supreme Court Justice, 40 Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi,, 187-188 Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 209-212 Criminal Justice and Law False confessions, 127-157 Wrongful convictions, 127-157 Ethics/Bioethics Adultery: Clinton, Bill, 5; Gingrich, Newt, 5 Biotechnological research, 47-51 Cheating, 32-33 Euthanasia, Schiavo, Terri, 186-187, 190 False confessions, 127-157 Industrial solvents and brain damage, 41 The virtuous circle of benevolence and compassion, 28-29 Marino, Gordon, 5 Pharmacological testing, 45-51 Reciprocity, 51-55 Torture, abuse, 197-208 Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 209-212 Wrongful convictions, 127-157 Psychology, Sociology, and Anthropology Alien abduction stories, 88-96 Catharsis theory false, 25-27 Confirmation bias, 18-20, 174 Dissonance theory’s challenge
    [Show full text]
  • The High Cost of Skepticism
    This article chronicles the tribulations noted psychologists Elizabeth Loftus and Melvin Guyer were put through for conduct- ing the investigation that is the subject of their ttvo-part article "Who Abused Jane Doe?" concluding in this issue of the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER (Pages 37-40).—The Editor The High Cost of Skepticism Here's what happened to two scientists who believed that tenure and the First Amendment would protect their rights to free inquiry. CAROL TAVRIS n the olden days, perhaps twenty or thirty years ago, aca- demic debates were marked by sweet discourse and the Iharmonious if impassioned hum of debate. (Also by sar- casm.) The rule used to be that if you disagreed with some- one's opinion or interpretations of data, you did the civilized thing—you called the person a knucklehead or an incompe- tent fool. Or you wrote a devastating reply explaining why the knucklehead was terminally wrong, misguided, or drunk. That was then. Just as noise trumps silence and rage trumps courtesy, the cudgel of lawsuits to silence or cower the opposition trumps free debate. In universities across the country, lawsuits, even spurious and unsuccessful ones, have weakened the once-sacrosanct guarantees to scholars of free SKEPTICAL INQUIRER luly/August 2002 41 speech and association. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) The Atlantic had conducted such an investigation, you would and Human Subjects Committees have proliferated, to protect know the city and state of all of the individuals interviewed, human subjects from harm caused by unethical scientists— their names (unless they requested anonymity), the data bases and to protect universities from any lawsuits that might ensue.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Alleged Child Abuse Cases
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 50 2017 Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Alleged Child Abuse Cases Richard Leo University of San Francisco Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Courts Commons, Evidence Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Richard Leo, Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Alleged Child Abuse Cases, 50 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 693 (2017). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol50/iss3/7 This Symposium Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICE INTERROGATION, FALSE CONFESSIONS, AND ALLEGED CHILD ABUSE CASES Richard A. Leo* I want to thank Justice McCormack for that great introduction. I want to thank Anna and Ben for having me here and for putting on this important Symposium. It’s a great honor to be at the University of Michigan, one of the great universities in the country and cer- tainly one of the great law schools. It’s always great to be in this building. When Justice McCormack’s assistant contacted me, I didn’t do what I usually do and send a bio and a CV. Instead, I sent her a 2012 opinion by the Michigan Supreme Court that trashed me and the scientific discipline that has empirically studied police interrogation and false confessions for more than a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Tavris and Avrum Bluming Page 1 DANNY LENNON
    Carol Tavris and Avrum Bluming DANNY LENNON: So, here we are. Very welcome to both of you, Carol and Avrum. Thank you so much for taking the time to join me today and discuss this impressive body of work. CAROL TAVRIS: Thank you for inviting us to talk with you. AVRUM BLUMING: It's our pleasure. DANNY LENNON: This has been really interesting for me. I think it was some stage, maybe the middle of last year where I originally reached out to you, Carol. Having read some of your previous books, was going to discuss some of that. And thankfully at that time you mentioned this new book that you've been working on and sent me a copy, which was quite eye-opening. So, we've been able to put this together and discuss some of these concepts. So, before we get into any of the specifics, maybe the best place to start is when we're talking about what happens with estrogen, particularly at menopause and post menopause. What is the best way to frame this for people in terms of number one, what happens during that stage to this hormone? And secondly, on a symptomatic level, what are some of the things that occur? AVRUM BLUMING: Estrogen is secreted largely by the ovaries. And around the time of menopause, usually Page 1 Carol Tavris and Avrum Bluming sometime between the ages 47 and 52, estrogen levels plummet. They can fall to 1% of the premenopausal level. And women are aware of this largely as the result of symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Selfish Gene Revisited Richard Dawkins
    Randi on Vaccinations | Miracle Tableau | UFO ‘Disclosure’ | FTC Tackles Homeopathy the Magazine for Science and Reason Vol. 41 No. 2 | March/April 2017 THE SELFISH GENE REVISITED RICHARD DAWKINS WHY SKEPTICISM? Ronald A. Lindsay WHY WE BELIEVE —LONG AFTER WE SHOULDN’T Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson GOD’S OWN MEDICINE Paul A. Offit SHOULDN’T SKEPTICS KNOW WHAT THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT? Massimo Pigliucci CSICON 2016 LAS VEGAS: A SPECIAL SECTION INTRODUCTORY PRICE U.S. and Canada $5.99 Published by the Center for Inquiry in association with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry a program of the Robyn E. Blumner, President and CEO Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Bar ry Karr, Ex ec u tive Di rect or Benjamin Radford, Research Fellow Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow www.csicop.org Fellows James E. Al cock*, psy chol o gist, York Univ., Tor on to Mur ray Gell-Mann, pro fes sor of phys ics, San ta Fe In sti tute; Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA Mar cia An gell, MD, former edi tor-in-chief, No bel lau re ate Lor en Pan kratz, psy chol o gist, Or e gon Health New Eng land Jour nal of Med i cine Thom as Gi lov ich, psy chol o gist, Cor nell Univ. Sci en ces Univ. Kimball Atwood IV, MD, physician; author; Newton, MA David H. Gorski, cancer surgeon and researcher at Barbara Robert L. Park, professor of physics, Univ. of Maryland Steph en Bar rett, MD, psy chi a trist; au thor; con sum er ad vo cate, Ann Kar manos Cancer Institute and chief of breast surgery Jay M.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissonance and Political Hypocrisy from Psychology Today
    11/28/2020 Dissonance and Political Hypocrisy | Psychology Today US Find a Therapist (City or Zip) Verified by Psychology Today Daniel R. Stalder Ph.D. Bias Fundamentals Dissonance and Political Hypocrisy A pandemic of self-protection and self-presentation. Posted Oct 12, 2020 10 I’ve been academically intrigued in recent months to see so many political references to “cognitive dissonance.” As a social psychologist who has taught and conducted dissonance research for over 20 years, I see apparent dissonance processes unfolding in real life all the time. And certainly, the popular press caught on to “dissonance” years ago. But lately, perhaps as another consequence of the pandemic, there seem to be even more popular press shout- outs to dissonance. There are even entire articles devoted to applying cognitive dissonance theory to political happenings and, in particular, to the perplexing remarks by politicians about Covid-19 (Aronson and Tavris, 2020). What Is Cognitive Dissonance? Cognitive dissonance is a discomfort caused by inconsistency which most of us are then motivated to try to reduce. In particular, it can be a feeling of hypocrisy or a realization of having made a mistake, and it’s unpleasant. Or it’s supposed to be unpleasant. How do so many politicians fall prey to it and then manage to handle it without coming clean? Of course, some admit their mistakes and even resign. And some have switched political sides even voicing the intention to make up for their perceived mistakes (Noor, 2020). This coming-clean mode of dissonance reduction can be called behavior change, but it is relatively rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Books and Ideas Podcast
    BOOKS AND IDEAS PODCAST With Ginger Campbell, MD Episode #431 Interview with Carol Tavris, PhD, Co-author of Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts [music] INTRODUCTION This is Episode 43 of Books and Ideas, and I’m your host, Dr. Ginger Campbell. Today’s episode is one I hope you will share with others, which is why I am also putting it into the Brain Science Podcast feed. My guest today is Dr. Carol Tavris, co-author of Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts. I was fortunate to meet Dr. Tavris last year at The Amazing Meeting in Las Vegas, and I’m glad that we finally got together to record this interview. In the first part of the interview Dr. Tavris tells us a little bit about the field of social psychology, and we talk about the relationship between psychology and neuroscience. Then we get into the meat of the interview, which is about cognitive dissonance. If you aren’t familiar with cognitive dissonance, I think you will be surprised to learn how it applies to almost every aspect of human endeavor. 1 Click here for audio. 1 Copyright Virginia Campbell, MD 2011 After the interview I will be back to review a few of the key ideas, and to tell you about how you can learn more. As always, you can find detailed show notes, including links to references, and a free episode transcript at booksandideas.com.
    [Show full text]