Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report - Addendum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report - Addendum Wiltshire Local Development Framework Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report - Addendum February 2012 Contents Page 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Sustainability appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment ............... 1 1.3 Identifying additional policies, plans and programmes .................................. 2 1.4 Baseline information ..................................................................................... 2 1.5 Identifying sustainability issues (including environmental problems) ............. 2 1.6 Sustainability Appraisal Framework .............................................................. 3 1.7 Consultation ................................................................................................. 3 1.8 Structure of this report .................................................................................. 3 2. Topic 1: Biodiversity .................................................................................. 5 2.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................... 5 2.2 Additional baseline information ..................................................................... 7 2.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 17 2.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 17 2.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 20 3. Topic 2: Land and soil resources ............................................................ 21 3.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 21 3.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 24 3.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 30 3.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 30 3.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 31 4. Topic 3: Water resources and flood risk ................................................. 32 4.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 32 4.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 37 4.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 41 4.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 42 4.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 42 5. Topic 4: Air quality and environmental pollution ................................... 43 5.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 43 5.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 44 5.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 48 5.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 49 5.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 49 6. Topic 5: Climatic factors .......................................................................... 50 6.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 50 6.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 51 6.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 55 6.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 55 6.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 56 7. Topic 6: Historic environment ................................................................. 57 7.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 57 7.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 62 7.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 66 7.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 66 7.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 68 8. Topic 7: Landscapes ................................................................................ 69 8.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 69 8.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 72 8.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 80 8.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 80 8.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 81 9. Topic 8: Population and housing ............................................................ 83 9.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 83 9.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 84 9.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 90 9.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 90 9.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 91 10. Topic 9: Healthy communities ................................................................. 92 10.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ................................................. 92 10.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................... 93 10.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy ... 98 10.4 Review of key sustainability issues ............................................................. 99 10.5 Sustainability objectives ............................................................................. 99 11. Topic 10: Inclusive communities ........................................................... 100 11.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ............................................... 100 11.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................. 101 11.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy . 104 11.4 Review of key sustainability issues ........................................................... 105 11.5 Sustainability objectives ........................................................................... 105 12. Topic 11: Education and skills .............................................................. 106 12.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ............................................... 106 12.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................. 106 12.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy . 109 12.4 Review of key sustainability issues ........................................................... 110 12.5 Sustainability objectives ........................................................................... 110 13. Topic 12: Transport ................................................................................ 112 13.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ............................................... 112 13.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................. 113 13.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy . 120 13.4 Review of key sustainability issues ........................................................... 120 13.5 Sustainability objectives ........................................................................... 122 14. Topic 13: Economy and enterprise ....................................................... 123 14.1 Additional policies, plans and programmes ............................................... 123 14.2 Additional baseline information ................................................................. 127 14.3 Likely evolution of the area without implementation of the Core Strategy . 137 14.4 Review of key sustainability issues ........................................................... 138 14.5 Sustainability objectives ........................................................................... 139 15. Next steps and further information………… ......................................... 140 Appendix A – Statutory environmental consultees consultation responses List of abbreviations Acronym Description AA Appropriate Assessment AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AQMA Air Quality Management Area ASB Anti-social behaviour BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BREEAM Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method CAF Countryside Access Forum CHP Combined Heat and Power CIL Community Infrastructure Levy CSH Code for Sustainable Homes CWS County Wildlife Site DCLG Department of Communities and Local Government
Recommended publications
  • A303 PI Inspector's Report
    Report to the First Secretary of The Planning State and the Secretary of State for Inspectorate 4/09 Kite Wing Transport Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay By Michael Ellison MA (Oxon) Bristol BS1 6PN 0117 372 6372 An Inspector appointed by the First Secretary Date: 31 January of State and the Secretary of State for 2005 Transport Assisted by Clive Cochrane Dip Arch, Reg Arch, MSc, MRTPI HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SLIP ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) (DETRUNKING) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SIDE ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER (NO. ) 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (COUNTESS ROUNDABOUT TO LONGBARROW CROSSROADS) (PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS) ORDER 200 AND THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (STONEHENGE BYWAY) (PROHIBITION OF MOTOR VEHICLES) ORDER 200 Dates of Inquiry: 17 February 2004 to 11 May 2004 Ref: HA61/4/3 REPORT TO THE FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT FILE REF: HA61/4/3 CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number Case Details 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Description of the site and its surroundings 7 3 Procedural Submission 12 4 The case of the Highways Agency 14 Background and history of the scheme 14 The need for the scheme 17 Traffic forecasts 20 The scheme proposals 21 Design standards 26
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Wiltshire's Space: One Public Estate
    Sharing Wiltshire’s space: One public estate Contents Foreword from Baroness Scott OBE, Chair Wiltshire Public Service Board Setting the scene 4 Delivery Plans 6 Meeting the pre-selection criteria Next steps Headline Outputs Key Projects Delivery schedule Costs 16 Capacity Fund Relationship database Programme Management Regeneration of Warminster Targeted funding request Regeneration schemes in Trowbridge and Chippenham Reopening of Corsham Rail Station Partnership and Governance Arrangements 16 Our story so far – track record of delivery 20 One Council Community Campus – or ‘Health and Wellbeing Community Centres’ Strategic Partnership between Wiltshire Council, Wiltshire Police and OPCC Wiltshire Council and NHS collaboration Wiltshire and the MoD Wiltshire and Dorset Fire and Rescue Service One Wiltshire Devolution Proposals Appendices – Terms of Reference for: 24 Wiltshire Public Service Board Wiltshire Public Estates Partnership Wiltshire Military Civilian Integration Partnership Table of Partners 2 Sharing Wiltshire’s space: One public estate Foreword Wiltshire’s vision is to create stronger, more resilient communities. The agencies on Wiltshire’s Public Service Board have committed to working more closely together and rationalising estates so that we can focus on: • Delivering integrated customer focused services and community facilities • Reducing demand, running costs and generating capital receipts • Creating economic growth – releasing land for jobs and housing and regenerating our towns and villages This means increasingly close working between public, private and voluntary organisations in the county to achieve better outcomes for the people of Wiltshire. Our work to date - combining five councils into one, delivering a strategic partnership between Wiltshire Council and Wiltshire Police (covering a joint ICT platform, co-located services and a Multi- Agency Safeguarding Hub) and developing the first phase of the Health and Wellbeing Community Centre in Corsham - has shown that we can genuinely transform service delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
    World Heritage 41 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 27 June / 27 juin 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-first session / Quarante-et-unième session Krakow, Poland / Cracovie, Pologne 2-12 July 2017 / 2-12 juillet 2017 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (373bis) Stonehenge, Avebury et sites associés (Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (373bis) 31 January – 3 February 2017 Report on the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated sites 31 January – 3 February 2017 Table of contents Executive Summary 1. Introductory Statements 1.1 Acknowledgments 1.2. Aims and mandate of the February 2017 Mission 2. Context and background 2.1 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) 2.2 Summary 1st Mission recommendations (October 2015 – report April 2016). 2.3 Reactions by the civil society 2.4 Governance and consensus building among heritage bodies 3. Responses by the SP to the recommendations of the first Mission - April 2016 3.1 Willingness to respond 3.2 Issues of archaeological organisation and quality control 3.3 Issue of visitor numbers and behaviour 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / Icomos Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 27-30 October 20
    REPORT ON THE JOINT WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE / ICOMOS ADVISORY MISSION TO STONEHENGE, AVEBURY AND ASSOCIATED SITES Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 27-30 OCTOBER 2015 Chris Barker, Civil Engineer, ICOMOS Nathan Schlanger, Archaeologist, ICOMOS Marie-Noël Tournoux, Project Officer Europe and North America Unit, World Heritage Centre Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……………………………………………………………….…… 4 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………..… 5 2 MISSION REPORT ……………………………………………………………………….. 7 3 MISSION CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………………. 24 4 MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………...…...... 24 5 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………... 28 6 ANNEXES…………....……………………………………………………………………... 29 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The joint World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS mission thanks the State Party for the arrangements for the Advisory Mission and the preparation of all the necessary relevant materials, together with the good will in its advancement. Particular thanks are due to DCMS and Historic England and more specifically to Keith Nichol and Hannah Jones from DCMS and Henry Owen-John and Phil McMahon from Historic England, our main focal points. The mission would like to acknowledge and to commend the investment and professionalism of our hosts in addition to logistics and hospitality. The assistance gladly provided by Historic England, English Heritage Trust, the National Trust, and their representatives, be it at organizational level or on the ground, including notably Chris Smith, Historic England, and Heather Sebire, Properties Curator West English Heritage Trust, Kate Davies, Stonehenge General Manager, English Heritage Trust, Beth Thomas & Sarah Simmonds, World Heritage site Coordinator, Nicola Snashall, National Trust WHS archaeologist for Stonehenge & Avebury, Cassandra Genn, Senior project and Stakeholder Manager, Ian Wilson, Assistant Director of Operations, Ingrid Samuel, Historic Environment Director, Janet Tomlin, National Trust, as well as the Wiltshire Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge A303 Improvement: Outline Assessment of the Impacts
    Stonehenge A303 improvement: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MCIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy January 2017 ©Historic England and the National Trust Stonehenge A303 improvements: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Executive Summary Introduction In 2014, English Heritage (now Historic England) and the National Trust commissioned an assessment (Snashall, Young 2014) on the potential impact of new road options, including a tunnel, for the A303 within the Stonehenge component of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage property. Since at that time, there were no detailed proposals, that report considered four possible alternatives and concluded that, of these, an off-line route with a tunnel of 2.9kms length would be the most deliverable solution. The government remains committed to improving the A303 and to funding sufficient for a tunnel of at least 2.9kms length within the World Heritage property. Highways England are consulting in early 2017 on route options developed since 2014 for this road scheme through the World Heritage property and bypassing Winterbourne Stoke village to the west. This report is an outline assessment of these initial options on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the World Heritage property. It has been commissioned to assess the impact of the latest road options in the light of updated archaeological information.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study
    Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership Final Report February 2016 Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study Final Report Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership February 2016 14793/MS/CGJ/LE Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL nlpplanning.com This document is formatted for double sided printing. © Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 2016. Trading as Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners. All Rights Reserved. Registered Office: 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL All plans within this document produced by NLP are based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study: Final Report Executive Summary This report has been prepared by Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners (‘NLP’) on behalf of the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (‘TVBLEP’) and the six Berkshire authorities of Bracknell Forest, Reading, Slough, West Berkshire, Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham. It establishes the various functional economic market areas that operate across Berkshire and the wider sub-region, in order to provide the six authorities and the TVBLEP with an understanding of the various economic relationships, linkages and flows which characterise the sub-regional economy. The methodological approach adopted for this study has been informed by national Planning Practice Guidance for assessing economic development needs and investigating functional economic market areas within and across local authority boundaries, and been subject to consultation with a range of adjoining authorities and other relevant stakeholders. A range of information and data has been drawn upon across a number of themes as summarised below: Economic and Sector Characteristics Berkshire has recorded strong job growth in recent years, outperforming the regional and national average.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and the Economy
    House of Commons Transport Committee Transport and the economy Third Report of Session 2010–11 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/transcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 February 2011 HC 473 Published on 2 March 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Supporting Statement and Statement of Community Consultation
    Stonehenge Visitor Facilities and Access Scheme Planning Supporting Statement and Statement of Community Consultation August 2004 ENGLISH HERITAGE Stonehenge Visitor Facilities and Access Scheme Planning Supporting Statement August 2004 ENGLISH HERITAGE English Heritage STONEHENGE VISITOR FACILITIES AND ACCESS SCHEME Planning Supporting Statement August 2004 Approved by: D Watkins Signed: ……………………………... Position: Associate Technical Director Date: 18 August 2004 CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES Environment Landscape Planning - 1 - STONEHENGE VISITOR FACILITIES AND ACCESS SCHEME PLANNING SUPPORTING STATEMENT __________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 THE NEED FOR THE SCHEME 3.0 THE PROPOSALS 4.0 PLANNING POLICY COMPLIANCE FIGURES 1. Illustrated Plan of the New Visitor Centre and Access Scheme 11083101_Planning Statement_18-08-04.doc - 2 - STONEHENGE VISITOR FACILITIES AND ACCESS SCHEME PLANNING SUPPORTING STATEMENT __________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Scheme 1.1 English Heritage is applying to Salisbury District Council for planning permission to undertake the following works that together comprise the Stonehenge Visitor Facilities and Access Scheme: x Construction of a New Visitor Centre with parking facilities located outside the World Heritage Site (WHS) east of Countess Road (A345), north of Amesbury; x Construction of a track to provide dispersed access by Land Trains from the New Visitor Centre to archaeological sites and monuments within the WHS; x Decommissioning and removal of the existing visitor facilities and car park at the Stonehenge monument, and their replacement with an operations facility concealed underground; x Decommissioning of the A344 between its junction with the A360 at Airman’s Corner and the entrance to the existing car park at the Stonehenge monument, and works to re-model the A344 road bed between Fargo Plantation and the existing car park; The Scheme is illustrated on Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy in the Context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention
    Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention Thematic Study, vol. 2 Clive Ruggles and Michel Cotte with contributions by Margaret Austin, Juan Belmonte, Nicolas Bourgeois, Amanda Chadburn, Danielle Fauque, Iván Ghezzi, Ian Glass, John Hearnshaw, Alison Loveridge, Cipriano Marín, Mikhail Marov, Harriet Nash, Malcolm Smith, Luís Tirapicos, Richard Wainscoat and Günther Wuchterl Edited by Clive Ruggles Published by Ocarina Books Ltd 27 Central Avenue, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, PO21 5HT, United Kingdom and International Council on Monuments and Sites Office: International Secretariat of ICOMOS, 49–51 rue de la Fédération, F–75015 Paris, France in conjunction with the International Astronomical Union IAU–UAI Secretariat, 98-bis Blvd Arago, F–75014 Paris, France Supported by Instituto de Investigaciones Arqueológicas (www.idarq.org), Peru MCC–Heritage, France Royal Astronomical Society, United Kingdom ISBN 978–0–9540867–6–3 (e-book) ISBN 978–2–918086–19–2 (e-book) © ICOMOS and the individual authors, 2017 All rights reserved A preliminary version of this publication was presented at a side-event during the 39th session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee (39COM) in Bonn, Germany, in July 2015 Front cover photographs: Star-timing device at Al Fath, Oman. © Harriet Nash Pic du Midi Observatory, France. © Claude Etchelecou Chankillo, Peru. © Iván Ghezzi Starlight over the church of the Good Shepherd, Tekapo, New Zealand. © Fraser Gunn Table of contents Preface ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wiltshire Council Strategic Planning Committee
    WILTSHIRE COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE Date of Meeting 20 January 2010 Application Number S/2009/1527 Site Address Airman’s Corner, Land South East Of the junction of the A360 and A344 Proposal Decommissioning of existing visitor facilities and a section of the A344; the erection of a new visitors centre, car park, coach park and ancillary services building; and related highways and landscaping works Applicant English Heritage Town/Parish Council 1) Winterbourne Stoke (proposed visitor centre) & 2) Amesbury (existing visitor centre) 1) Ian West, 2) Fred Electoral Division Unitary Members Westmoreland. Grid Ref 1) 409867 142906 2) 412185 142340 Type of application Full Case Officer Adam Madge 01722 434380 Adam.Madge@Wiltshire .gov.u k Reason for the application being considered by Committee The application by reason of the importance of the Stonehenge scheduled monument and the surrounding World Heritage Site, both regionally, nationally and worldwide is considered to be a strategic development and is therefore required to be considered by the Strategic Planning Committee. Purpose of Report 1. To consider the above application and to recommend that planning permission be APPROVED subject to conditions and the signing of a s106 legal agreement. Members should note that this application is accompanied by an environmental statement as required under schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) England and Wales Regulations 1999 (as amended) paragraph 10 (b). Main Issues 2. The application is seeking
    [Show full text]
  • Powering the Digital Economy 2015 Foreword
    POWERING THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 2015 FOREWORD BARONESS JOANNA SHIELDS GERARD GRECH CHAIR, TECH CITY UK CEO, TECH CITY UK In 2013, we created the Tech City UK Cluster Alliance to engage digital businesses across the From East London’s Tech City up to EdinBurgh and Beyond, digital Businesses increasingly choose purpose of using their collective expertise to to work near each other, creating dynamic tech accelerate digital growth. clusters up and down the country. THE RT. HON. DAVID CAMERON MP It Became clear that great digital companies Each cluster has its own unique DNA and assets. PRIME MINISTER spring from collaborative communities of Every digital company is on its own trajectory. But entrepreneurs, supported By established nearly everyone we spoke to during the Tech Nation Backing the industries of the future is a key part of our long-term businesses, universities and Government all project said they work Best when they’re near other economic plan to support business, create more jobs and build working toward common goals. This report like-minded Businesses: sharing resources, ideas a more resilient economy. The digital economy has become an showcases 21 digital clusters across the UK where and expertise. integral part of our country and the rapid growth of many digital talent and great ideas have come together to fuel The UK’s digital economy is thriving. Venture innovation and success. capital investment in London’s tech companies technology excellence. For the digital landscape is far greater than the Through Tech City UK, this Government has supported digital capital alone – 74% of the digital Businesses we entrepreneurs in London, creating one of the capital’s great success analysed are actually Based outside Inner London.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Sunday Times Supplement
    September 10, 2017 Researched and compiled by Fast Track BRITAIN’S Title sponsor Main sponsors FASTEST TECH GROWING PRIVATE TECHNOLOGY TRACK 100 COMPANIES Britain’s brightest win global backing Our latest research shows a record number of hyper-growth tech companies have attracted investors, writes Chris Marshall Clever British tech entrepreneurs are vehicle of Autonomy co-founder Mike attracting cash from all over the world in Lynch. It has raised $180m (£138m), a vote of confidence for the UK’s thriving including $75m in July. Headquartered digital economy in spite of fears that in Cambridge and San Francisco, it is Brexit could stifle investment. among the 80 Tech Track 100 companies More than two-thirds (68) of this year’s that have generated revenue overseas. Sunday Times Hiscox Tech Track 100 Another is Farfetch (No 52), an online have raised money from private equity fashion platform that has raised £500m, houses, venture capital firms and busi- including $397m (£305m) from Chinese ness angels from Europe, Asia and Amer- ecommerce business JD.com in June. ica. This was up from 46 last year and the Farfetch is one of three unicorns in the highest since the league table was first table — small, fast-growing tech firms published in 2001. However, there are a with valuations of more than $1bn. The record 40 loss-making companies, com- others are currency exchange platform pared with 25 typically — and this comes TransferWise (No 5) and peer-to-peer amid growing concerns of another tech lending platform Funding Circle (No 27). bubble, not helped by worries over the Of the unicorns that appeared in the Tech future of Uber.
    [Show full text]