DOCSLIB.ORG

Determining and Quantifying Threats to Coastal Cetaceans: a Regional Collaborative Workshop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determining and Quantifying Threats to Coastal Cetaceans: a Regional Collaborative Workshop Determining and quantifying threats to coastal cetaceans: A regional collaborative workshop Determining and quantifying threats to coastal cetaceans: A regional collaborative workshop February 22-24, 2011 Permai Rainforest Resort (Kuching, Sarawak) FINAL REPORT Edited by Gianna Minton and Brian D. Smith - 1 - Determining and quantifying threats to coastal cetaceans: A regional collaborative workshop FOREWORD By Randall Reeves, Chair of the IUCN Cetacean Specialist Group There was a time when the impetus for most meetings and workshops on marine mammals in southern Asia (as well as Africa and South America) came from North America and Europe. In those days, Asian marine mammalogists were working largely in isolation, on shoestring budgets and with minimal (if any) institutional support. Their work rarely made it into the mainstream scientific literature. When they occasionally managed to attend an international conference, it was mostly to learn about discoveries made by scientists from elsewhere, using tools and study methods that were, or seemed, inaccessible. Thank goodness those days are behind us. The workshop in Kuching is a good, but by no means unique, example of how things have changed over the last couple of decades. It was conceived and organized within the region and supported by an Asian conservation foundation. Participants came from many parts of southern Asia, most of them with advanced degrees and solid experience. A few carefully selected experts from outside the region were invited, not just to lecture and pontificate but to engage in peer-to-peer discussions. As is plainly evident from the workshop report, those discussions were lively and frank, just as one would expect from such a capable and motivated group. Like most workshops, this one generated a long wish-list of follow-up activities. Some of these may prove difficult in some parts of the region, but I’m encouraged by the practical tone of the report. The participants clearly were not starry-eyed novices, nor were they dismissive cynics. It is a challenge to balance realism and idealism, and this group did an admirable job of striving to achieve such a balance. The problems discussed at the workshop can be addressed only partly through science. Although it is important to know what species are present and in what numbers, their ecological needs, how many are dying in fishing gear, and how the animals respond to various kinds of human activity, that isn’t enough. We also need to know what makes us humans do what we do and how our behaviour can be modified to reduce our impacts on the natural environment. It is vital to pose some of the tough questions raised at this workshop, such as those having to do with the pros and cons of nature-oriented tourism, whether to engage with industry and if so how, and the most effective means of conducting community outreach and education. However, getting at the human dimension of conservation is not what most biologists and ecologists have been trained to do, so there is a clear need for us to collaborate more closely with economists and social scientists as well as with fishermen, teachers, journalists, tourboat operators and other people who are part of local communities. The Sarawak Dolphin Project at the Universiti Malaysia Sarawak is to be commended for the painstaking, thorough, and considerate way the workshop was planned and conducted. By all accounts, those lucky enough to attend were inspired, informed, and treated to unmatched local hospitality. It is impossible to measure precisely the “success” of an event like this one. In the coming months and years, it will be difficult even for those directly involved to know how their individual thinking, options, and choices were affected. The metric that will matter most, by far, is to what extent the workshop, and the many connections established among those involved, have helped to create a better future for coastal cetacean populations in the region. Finally, it’s important to acknowledge the principal workshop sponsor, Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong (OPCFHK). Over the last two decades OPCFHK has become a regional force for conservation. In fact, not just this workshop, but also much of its underlying groundwork in research, education, and awareness, is a legacy of OPCF support. - 2 - Determining and quantifying threats to coastal cetaceans: A regional collaborative workshop WORKSHOP SUMMARY The “Determining and quantifying threats to coastal cetaceans: A regional collaborative workshop” was hosted by the Universiti of Malaysia’s Sarawak Dolphin Project and funded by the Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong (OPCFHK). Participants (27) from the Asian region were resident for 3 days and 4 nights in the Permai Rainforest Resort, overlooking the Salak-Santubong Bay, one of the core habitats of Irrawaddy dolphins and finless porpoises in Sarawak. The core participants were from Peninsular and East Malaysia, Bangladesh, Brunei, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand, with international representation from the USA, Australia and Britain. The opening ceremony included presentations and participation by local stakeholders, academics, and NGOs. The workshop focused on identifying key gaps in our knowledge of coastal cetaceans in Southeast Asia, evaluating techniques for determining and quantifying threats, and using the results from scientific studies for conservation management. The emphasis was on small cetaceans with near- and inshore distributions that do not extend beyond the continental shelf: the Irrawaddy dolphin Orcaella brevirostris, finless porpoise Neophocaena phocaenoides, Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin Sousa chinensis, and Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin Tursiops aduncus. Participants also recognized that nearshore waters in Southeast Asia provide vital habitat for populations of some pelagic species (e.g., spinner dolphins Stenella longirostris and dwarf spinner dolphins, S. longirostris roseiventris) and support at least two large baleen whales: small-form of Bryde’s whales Balaenoptera edeni and Omurai’s whales B. omurai. Topical presentations were given by international experts and case studies were presented by regional participants. Research and monitoring techniques were discussed for conducting population and bycatch assessments, establishing stranding networks, and investigating the impacts of coastal and freshwater development. Developing strong partnerships with local fishing communities, national universities, government agencies, and nature tourism operators was stressed. During three days of presentations, discussions, and exchange of reference and media materials, workshop participants identified the following knowledge gaps that hinder effective conservation and management: The size, range and identity of populations, information particularly important for species with restricted and patchy distributions such as those occurring along the complex coastlines and island archipelagos of Southeast Asia; Details on bycatch, including the gears responsible, species involved and mortality rates, which present a special research challenge due to the small-scale and diverse nature of coastal fisheries in Southeast Asia; Basic ecology and life history parameters of species populations, including survival rates, prey composition, and habitat preferences, information vital for conducting viability analyses and assessing the impacts of environmental changes associated with declining freshwater supplies, coastal reclamation and climate change; and Resource use and the socioeconomic status and attitudes of human communities, which is essential for incorporating their needs in, and ensuring their support for, conservation plans Workshop participants agreed on the following recommendations for research and monitoring: Genetic studies should be undertaken to assess population identities and isolation. If (sub) populations are found to be genetically distinct, greater priority should be placed on implementing measures to protect them. An emphasis should be placed on risk assessment techniques including statistical analysis of trends in relative abundance and modelling the spatial and temporal overlap between cetacean distribution and threats. - 3 - Determining and quantifying threats to coastal cetaceans: A regional collaborative workshop Increased use should be made of passive acoustics to detect cetacean presence, especially for those species that are difficult to detect visually (e.g., finless porpoises) and are located in inaccessible locations or at times of year when visual/boat surveys are not practical. Acoustic hard- and software is becoming more user-friendly, effective and less expensive. Standardized fisheries/community questionnaires should be developed, shared and adapted to local conditions so that the results can more easily compared across the region. The content of the questionnaires should be guided by ethical standards required by many universities and research/funding bodies and include a statement informing respondents of these standards. Shore-based surveys should be considered as an alternative to boat surveys in locations where suitably high observation platforms are available, especially when investigating behavioural responses to potential disturbances from coastal construction or vessel traffic. Platforms of opportunity, including tourism and seismic, fisheries, and oceanographic survey vessels, should be used as feasible to collect data on cetacean distribution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kualiti Air Marin Dan Pulau-Pulau Marine and Island Marine Water Quality
    Kualiti Air Marin dan Pulau-Pulau Marine and Island Marine Water Quality BAB Chapter 4 107 BAB 04 PENGAWASAN KUALITI MARINE WATER QUALITY AIR MARIN MONITORING Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS) Department of Environment (DOE) has menjalankan pengawasan kualiti been monitoring the marine water air marin bermula pada tahun 1978 quality since 1978 in Peninsular Malaysia di Semenanjung Malaysia dan 1985 and 1985 in Sabah and Sarawak with bagi Sabah dan Sarawak dengan the main objective to establish the tujuan untuk mengenalpasti status marine water quality status and to kualiti air marin dan menentukan determine the degree of pollution from tahap pencemaran daripada both the land-based as well as the sea punca-punca di daratan dan juga based sources. These sources may di laut. Punca-punca pencemaran pose threats to the marine resources ini boleh menimbulkan ancaman which would upset the stability and kepada sumber kehidupan marin diversity of the marine ecosystem. dan menganggu kestabilan serta kepelbagaian ekosistem marin. Pada tahun 2018, sebanyak 188 stesen In year 2018, a total of 188 coastal, pantai, 85 stesen kuala dan 95 stesen 85 estuary and 95 island stations were pulau telah dipantau. Sebanyak 1128 monitored. As many as 1128 samples sampel di kawasan pantai, 510 di kuala from coastal, 510 samples from estuary dan 570 di pulau telah diambil untuk and 570 samples from island monitoring dianalisis dan hasilnya dilaporkan stations were collected for analyses berdasarkan Indeks Kualiti Air Marin and reported based on the Marine (IKAM). Water Quality Index (MWQI). IKAM digunakan sebagai satu kaedah The MWQI was used to reflect the marine untuk menentukan kategori dan status water quality status and its category.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) Country Position Paper—Malaysia
    CORAL TRIANGLE INITIATIVE: EcOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT (EAFM) Country Position Paper—Malaysia May 2013 This publication was prepared for Malaysia’s National Coordinating Committee with funding from the United States Agency for International Development’s Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP). Coral Triangle Initiative: Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM): Country Position Paper – Malaysia AUTHOR: Kevin Hiew EDITOR: Jasmin Saad, OceanResearch KEY CONTRIBUTORS: Gopinath Nagarai, Fanli Marine Consultancy USAID PROJecT NUMBER: GCP LWA Award # LAG-A-00-99-00048-00 CITATION: Hiew, K., J. Saad, and N. Gopinath. Coral Triangle Initiative: Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM): Country Position Paper—Malaysia. Publication. Honolulu, Hawaii: The USAID Coral Triangle Support Partnership, 2012. Print. PRINTED IN: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 2013 This is a publication of the Coral Triangle Initiative on Corals, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF). Funding for the preparation of this document was provided by the USAID-funded Coral Triangle Support Partnership (CTSP). CTSP is a consortium led by the World Wildlife Fund, The Nature Conservancy and Conservation International with funding support from the United States Agency for International Development’s Regional Asia Program. For more information on the Coral Triangle Initiative, please contact: Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security Interim-Regional Secretariat Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Mina Bahari Building II, 17th Floor Jalan Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16 Jakarta Pusat 10110, Indonesia www.coraltriangleinitiative.org CTI-CFF National Coordinating Committee Professor Nor Aeni Haji Mokhtar Under Secretary National Oceanography Directorate, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Level 6, Block C4, Complex C, Federal Government Administrative Centre, 62662 Putrajaya, Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Tales: Cetacean Stranding Reponse and Medicine in the Pacific Northwest
    Proceedings of the 2012 North American Veterinary Conference, Orlando, Florida WHALE TALES: CETACEAN STRANDING REPONSE AND MEDICINE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Joseph K. Gaydos, VMD, PhD UC Davis Wildlife Health Center – Orcas Island Office Eastsound, Washington MARINE MAMMAL STRANDINGS: Marine mammal strandings have long attracted the attention of the general public.1 Stranded marine mammal carcasses once were used as food and some of the first laws enacted in New England Colonies were to establish the ownership of beached whale carcasses. Later stranded marine mammals provided animals for museums, live displays and scientific information about little-known species. Today they still provide us with important data on marine mammals and marine mammal populations. Strandings help us to document range expansions for marine mammal species and provide details on marine mammal growth rates, age at maturity, gestation, reproductive season and longevity. Stranded marine mammals also help expand our understanding of marine mammal mortality factors including infectious diseases, toxins and human-caused mortality. In the United States, the Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972) gave the federal government jurisdiction over marine mammals, including stranded ones. An amendment in 1992 established a Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program to (1) facilitate the collection and dissemination of reference data on the health of marine mammals and health trends of marine mammals in the wild; (2) correlate the health of marine mammals and marine mammal populations, in the wild, with available data on physical, chemical, and biological environmental parameters; and (3) coordinate effective responses to unusual mortality events by establishing a process in the Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Bako National Park S60 Gunung Mulu NP
    TOTAL COMBINE AREA (ha) NO NAME OF TPA (As of Nov 2020) GAZETTE No. GAZETTEMENT DATE LAND MARINE Total 1 Bako National Park S60 1 May, 1957 2,727.00 0.00 2,727.00 Gunung Mulu NP (All) Gunong Mulu National Park 2853 1 August, 1974 2 85,671.00 0.00 85,671.00 Gunong Mulu National Park (Ext.I) 2621 9 February, 2012 Gunong Mulu National Park (Ext. II) 3161 4 May, 2011 3 Niah National Park 50 23 November, 1974 3,139.00 0.00 3,139.00 4 Lambir Hills National Park 1899 15 May, 1975 6,949.00 0.00 6,949.00 Similajau NP (All) Similajau National Park 1337 25 November, 1976 8,996.00 5 22,120.00 Similajau National Park (1st Ext.) 2248 5 April, 2000 Similajau National Park (Ext.II) 130 23 May, 2000 13,124.00 6 Gunung Gading National Park 3289 1 August, 1983 4,196.00 0.00 4,196.00 7 Kubah National Park 2220 17 November, 1988 2,230.00 0.00 2,230.00 8 Batang Ai National Park 1288 28 February, 1991 24,040.00 0.00 24,040.00 9 Loagan Bunut National Park 2790 25 June, 1990 10,736.00 0.00 10,736.00 10 Tanjung Datu National Park 1102 16 March, 1994 752.00 627.00 1,379.00 11 Talang Satang National Park 3565 27 September, 1999 0.00 19,414.00 19,414.00 Maludam NP 12 Maludam National Park 1997 30 March, 2000 53,568.00 0.00 53,568.00 Maludam National Park (Ext 1) 2337 13 March, 2013 13 Bukit Tiban National Park 1998 17 February, 2000 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 14 Rajang Mangroves National Park 2833 29 May, 2000 9,373.00 0.00 9,373.00 Gunung Buda National Park (All) Gunung Buda National Park 189 14 September, 2000 15 11,307.00 0.00 11,307.00 Gunung Buda National Park (1st Ext) 3163 17 March, 2011 16 Kuching Wetland National Park 3512 24 July, 2002 6,610.00 0.00 6,610.00 Pulong Tau NP (All) 17 Pulong Tau National Park 919 10 January, 2005 69,817.00 0.00 69,817.00 Pulong Tau National Park(ext I) 2472 6 January, 2013 18 Usun Apau National Park 3153 5 May, 2005 49,355.00 0.00 49,355.00 19 Miri-Sibuti Coral Reefs National Park 1144 16 March, 2007 0.00 186,930.00 186,930.00 Santubong National Park (All) 20 Santubong National Park 2303 28 May, 2007 1,641.00 2,165.00 3,806.00 Santubong NP (Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Impacts of Anthropogenic Underwater Sound in the Marine Environment
    Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment Biodiversity Series 2009 Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the signature à la réunion ministérielle des former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, on 22 September 1992. The Convention à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, and approved by the European Community le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne and Spain. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. 2 OSPAR Commission, 2009 Acknowledgements Author list (in alphabetical order) Thomas Götz Scottish Oceans Institute, East Sands University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB [email protected] Module 2, 8 Gordon Hastie SMRU Limited New Technology Centre North Haugh St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SR [email protected] Module 2, 8 Leila T.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS and CONSERVATION of FRESHWATER POPULATIONS of IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D
    WORKING PAPER NO. 31 MAY 2007 STATUS AND CONSERVATION OF FRESHWATER POPULATIONS OF IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D. Smith, Robert G. Shore and Alvin Lopez WORKING PAPER NO. 31 MAY 2007 sTATUS AND CONSERVATION OF FRESHWATER POPULATIONS OF IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D. Smith, Robert G. Shore and Alvin Lopez WCS Working Papers: ISSN 1530-4426 Copies of the WCS Working Papers are available at http://www.wcs.org/science Cover photographs by: Isabel Beasley (top, Mekong), Danielle Kreb (middle, Mahakam), Brian D. Smith (bottom, Ayeyarwady) Copyright: The contents of this paper are the sole property of the authors and cannot be reproduced without permission of the authors. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) saves wildlife and wild lands around the world. We do this through science, conservation, education, and the man- agement of the world's largest system of urban wildlife parks, led by the flag- ship Bronx Zoo. Together, these activities inspire people to imagine wildlife and humans living together sustainably. WCS believes that this work is essential to the integrity of life on earth. Over the past century, WCS has grown and diversified to include four zoos, an aquarium, over 100 field conservation projects, local and international educa- tion programs, and a wildlife health program. To amplify this dispersed con- servation knowledge, the WCS Institute was established as an internal “think tank” to coordinate WCS expertise for specific conservation opportunities and to analyze conservation and academic trends that provide opportunities to fur- ther conservation effectiveness. The Institute disseminates WCS' conservation work via papers and workshops, adding value to WCS' discoveries and experi- ence by sharing them with partner organizations, policy-makers, and the pub- lic.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status and the Use of Irrawaddy Dolphins As a Flagship
    Conservation status and the use of Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia Building Resilience to Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Southeast Asia (BCR) Brian Smith, Sun Kong and Lieng Saroeun INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE The designation of geographical entities in this Citation: Smith, B., Kong, S., and Saroeun, L. book, and the presentation of the material, do not (2014). Conservation status and the use of imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife the part of IUCN or the European Union concerning Sanctuary, Cambodia. Thailand: IUCN. 80pp. the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its Cover photo: Dolphins in Koh Kong Province, frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this Cambodia © IUCN Cambodia/Sun Kong publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, the European Union or any other participating Layout by: Ria Sen organizations. Produced by: IUCN Southeast Asia Group This publication has been made possible by funding from the European Union. Available from: IUCN Asia Regional Office Published by: IUCN Asia in Bangkok, Thailand 63 Soi Prompong, Sukhumvit 39, Wattana 10110 Bangkok, Thailand Copyright: © 2014 IUCN, International Union for Tel: +66 2 662 4029 Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN Cambodia Reproduction of this publication for educational or #6B, St. 368, Boeng Keng Kang III, other non-commercial purposes is authorized Chamkarmon, PO Box 1504, Phnom Penh, without prior written permission from the copyright Cambodia holder provided the source is fully acknowledgeRia d.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocation of Trapped Bolivian River Dolphins (Inia Boliviensis)
    J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 21: 17–23, 2020 17 Translocation of trapped Bolivian river dolphins (Inia boliviensis) ENZO ALIAGA-ROSSEL1,3AND MARIANA ESCOBAR-WW2 Contact e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Bolivian river dolphin, locally known as the bufeo, is the only cetacean in land-locked Bolivia. Knowledge about its conservation status and vulnerability to anthropogenic actions is extremely deficient. We report on the rescue and translocation of 26 Bolivian river dolphins trapped in a shrinking segment of the Pailas River, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Several institutions, authorities and volunteers collaborated to translocate the dolphins, which included calves, juveniles, and pregnant females. The dolphins were successfully released into the Río Grande. Each dolphin was accompanied by biologists who assured their welfare. No detectable injuries occurred and none of the dolphins died during this process. If habitat degradation continues, it is likely that events in which river dolphins become trapped in South America may happen more frequently in the future. KEYWORDS: BOLIVIAN RIVER DOLPHIN; HABITAT DEGRADATION; CONSERVATION; STRANDINGS; TRANSLOCATION; SOUTH AMERICA INTRODUCTION distinct species, geographically isolated from the boto or Small cetaceans are facing several threats from direct or Amazon River dolphin (I. geoffrensis) (Gravena et al., 2014; indirect human impacts (Reeves et al., 2000). The pressure Ruiz-Garcia et al., 2008). This species has been categorised on South American and Asian river dolphins is increasing; by the Red Book of Wildlife Vertebrates of Bolivia as evidently, different river systems have very different problems. Vulnerable (VU), highlighting the need to conserve and Habitat degradation, dam construction, modification of river protect them from existing threats (Aguirre et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • KKM HEADQUARTERS Division / Unit Activation Code PEJABAT Y.B. MENTERI 3101010001 PEJABAT Y.B
    KKM HEADQUARTERS Division / Unit Activation Code PEJABAT Y.B. MENTERI 3101010001 PEJABAT Y.B. TIMBALAN MENTERI 3101010002 PEJABAT KETUA SETIAUSAHA 3101010003 PEJABAT TIMBALAN KETUA SETIAUSAHA (PENGURUSAN) 3101010004 PEJABAT TIMBALAN KETUA SETIAUSAHA (KEWANGAN) 3101010005 PEJABAT KETUA PENGARAH KESIHATAN 3101010006 PEJABAT TIMBALAN KETUA PENGARAH KESIHATAN (PERUBATAN) 3101010007 PEJABAT TIMBALAN KETUA PENGARAH KESIHATAN (KESIHATAN AWAM) 3101010008 PEJABAT TIMBALAN KETUA PENGARAH KESIHATAN (PENYELIDIKAN DAN SOKONGAN TEKNIKAL) 3101010009 PEJABAT PENGARAH KANAN (KESIHATAN PERGIGIAN) 3101010010 PEJABAT PENGARAH KANAN (PERKHIDMATAN FARMASI) 3101010011 PEJABAT PENGARAH KANAN (KESELAMATAN DAN KUALITI MAKANAN) 3101010012 BAHAGIAN AKAUN 3101010028 BAHAGIAN AMALAN DAN PERKEMBANGAN FARMASI 3101010047 BAHAGIAN AMALAN DAN PERKEMBANGAN KESIHATAN PERGIGIAN 3101010042 BAHAGIAN AMALAN PERUBATAN 3101010036 BAHAGIAN DASAR DAN HUBUNGAN ANTARABANGSA 3101010019 BAHAGIAN DASAR DAN PERANCANGAN STRATEGIK FARMASI 3101010050 BAHAGIAN DASAR DAN PERANCANGAN STRATEGIK KESIHATAN PERGIGIAN 3101010043 BAHAGIAN DASAR PERANCANGAN STRATEGIK DAN STANDARD CODEX 3101010054 BAHAGIAN KAWALAN PENYAKIT 3101010030 BAHAGIAN KAWALAN PERALATAN PERUBATAN 3101010055 BAHAGIAN KAWALSELIA RADIASI PERUBATAN 3101010041 BAHAGIAN KEJURURAWATAN 3101010035 BAHAGIAN KEWANGAN 3101010026 BAHAGIAN KHIDMAT PENGURUSAN 3101010023 BAHAGIAN PEMAKANAN 3101010033 BAHAGIAN PEMATUHAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI 3101010053 BAHAGIAN PEMBANGUNAN 3101010020 BAHAGIAN PEMBANGUNAN KESIHATAN KELUARGA 3101010029 BAHAGIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Distribution and Diversity of Bats from Selected Localities in Sarawak
    Borneo J. Resour. Sci. Tech. (2011) 1: 1-13 COMPARATIVE DISTRIBUTION AND DIVERSITY OF BATS FROM SELECTED LOCALITIES IN SARAWAK JAYARAJ VIJAYA KUMARAN*1, BESAR KETOL2, WAHAP MARNI2, ISA SAIT2, MOHAMAD JALANI MORTADA2, FAISAL ALI ANWARALI KHAN2, 3, FONG POOI HAR2, 4, LESLIE S. HALL5 & MOHD TAJUDDIN ABDULLAH2 1Faculty of Agro Industry and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Locked bag 36, Pengkalan Chepa, 16100 Kota Bharu, Kelantan; 2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Main and Flint, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA; 4Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, UCSI University, No.1, Jalan Menara Gading, UCSI Heights, 56000 Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 5Visiting Research Fellow, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak ABSTRACT Surveys on the chiropteran diversity were conducted at eight different localities in Sarawak to document the bat diversity as well as to estimate the composition of bats in these areas. The major finding of bat surveys shows that montane areas have distinct chiropteran composition compared with those in lowland and logged areas. Disturbed habitats do pose a threat to the overall diversity of bats, with the generalist bats been more successful in colonising altered area than those with specialised habitat requirements. Sampling of bats targeted at different site and vegetation type from several protected areas in Sarawak have revealed the current record of bats in Sarawak and its diversity can be monitored for better management of biodiversity in this important region. Keywords: Diversity, chiroptera, forest types, montane, habitat disturbance, Borneo INTRODUCTION 1940, later revised by Ellerman & Morisson-Scott 1955).
    [Show full text]
  • Comoros Island Chain and Adjacent Reef Banks IMMA
    Comoros Island Chain and Adjacent Reef Banks IMMA Summary The area of the Comoros (Grande Comore, Mohéli, Anjouan), Mayotte and other reef banks under French jurisdiction (Zélée/Geyser complex and the Glorieuses) includes submarine canyons and a large Area Size number of seamounts located between the main 65,900km2 islands. Small resident populations of coastal dolphins occur around Mayotte, particularly Indo-Pacific Qualifying Species and Criteria bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) and Humpback whale – Megaptera novaeangliae. endangered Indian Ocean humpback dolphins (Sousa Criterion A; B (ii); C (i, iii) plumbea). Throughout the archipelago, high densities Blue whale – Balaenoptera musculus. of oceanic delphinids have been recorded, Criterion A; B (ii); C (iii) particularly spinner dolphins, pantropical spotted dolphins and melon-headed whales (Peponocephala Sperm whale – Physeter macrocephalus. electra). Other common species include dwarf sperm Criterion A; B (ii) whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, sperm whales, Melon-headed whale – Peponocephala electra. short-finned pilot whales, and false killer whales. The Criterion B (ii) density of migrating humpback whales is particularly high off the south coast of Moheli, in the coastal Short-finned pilot whale – Globicephala macrorhynchus. Criterion B (ii) waters of Grande Comore and on the Geyser/Zélée complex. Finally, dugongs still occur in small numbers Spinner dolphin – Stenella longirostris. in the lagoon of Mayotte, in the Moheli Marine Park Criterion B (ii) (south coast), but this population has declined greatly Indo-Pacific Bottlenose dolphin – Tursiops over the past four decades. aduncus. Criterion B (i) Indian Ocean humpback dolphin – Sousa Description plumbea. Criterion A; B (i) The Comoros archipelago is located in the northern Mozambique Channel, in the southwest tropical Indian Pantropical spotted dolphins – Stenella Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Impacts of Noise from Human Activities on Cetaceans Knowledge Gap Analysis and Recommendations
    2014 Reducing Impacts of Noise from Human Activities on Cetaceans Knowledge Gap Analysis and Recommendations Prepared by Andrew J. Wright, Ph.D. For WWF Published in February 2014 by WWF, Gland, Switzerland. Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as copyright holder. Text © 2014 A. J. Wright / WWF Written by Andrew J. Wright, Department of Environmental Science & Policy, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, U.S.A. Cover image: © John Calambokidis, Cascadia Research Suggested citation Wright, A.J. 2014. Reducing Impacts of Human Ocean Noise on Cetaceans: Knowledge Gap Analysis and Recommendations. WWF International, Gland, Switzerland Prepared under contract for WWF International, Avenue du Mont-Blanc 27, 1196 Gland, Switzerland Authors Acknowledgements Thanks to WWF International for funding this report. Additionally, many thanks to Jakob Tougaard and Courtney Smith for extensive helpful discussions on a number of the topics and details contained within these pages. I am also grateful to Mikhail Babenko, Louise Blight and Aimée Leslie of WWF, as well as Thea Bechshøft, Chris Parsons and Leslie Walsh for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the report. Finally, thanks to Mark Simmonds and Naomi Rose for their help and advice with the overview and direc- tion of this report, and to Richard Greene and Michael Jasny for their assistance with tracking down various documents and publications. About WWF Since 1992, WWF’s Global Arctic Programme has been working with our partners across the Arctic to com- bat threats to the Arctic and to preserve its rich biodiversity in a sustainable way.
    [Show full text]