Freedom of Religion and Canada's Commitments to Multiculturalism: A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freedom of Religion and Canada's Commitments to Multiculturalism: A Freedom of Religion and Canada’s Commitments to Multiculturalism: A Critical Analysis of the Rights-based Approach by Howard Kislowicz A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Faculty of Law University of Toronto © Copyright by Howard Kislowicz 2009 Freedom of Religion and Canada’s Commitment to Multiculturalism: A Critical Analysis of the Rights-based Approach Howard Kislowicz Master of Laws Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2009 Abstract This thesis argues that the current Canadian approach to freedom of religion is inconsistent with Canada’s approach to multiculturalism. It begins by placing Canada’s multiculturalism legislation into the broader intellectual context of the leading political theories on the governance of diverse populations. It then examines the Canadian case law regarding freedom of religion, arguing that the prevailing rights-based approach produces consequences inconsistent with Canada’s legislated commitments to multiculturalism. It posits that the individualism of rights- based analysis, the pressure to frame religion in pre-defined ways, and the tendency of courts to speak in the language of tolerance are all troublesome. Further, it argues that when disputes are framed in terms of rights, meaningful dialogue is less likely and compromises are difficult to achieve. It then proposes an alternative, “difference-based” approach to disputes involving religion, which provides a framework more consistent with Canada’s multicultural ideals. ii Acknowledgments Thanks are due to my supervisor, Prof. Ayelet Shachar, for her guidance and comments throughout the research and writing of this thesis. Thanks as well to Prof. David Schneiderman for serving as second reader and providing helpful comments, and to Profs. Audrey Macklin, Jennifer Nedelsky and Anver Emon for stimulating and inspiring lectures. Many thanks also to Dr. Naomi Lear for her helpful suggestions and support. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents........................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1 Canadian Multiculturalism and Freedom of Religion.................................................... 1 1 Canadian Multiculturalism and Freedom of Religion................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of this Work........................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2 The (Contested) Objectives of Multiculturalism............................................................ 9 2 The (Contested) Objectives of Multiculturalism........................................................................ 9 2.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Political Theories of Multiculturalism.............................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Recognition, Identity and Dignity: Taylor............................................................ 11 2.2.2 Modus Vivendi: Jacob Levy’s Multiculturalism of Fear....................................... 16 2.2.3 Culture as context for freedom and choice: Kymlicka ......................................... 20 2.2.4 Universal values through cross-cultural dialogue: Parekh.................................... 23 2.2.5 Space for religious expression within the rule of law: McLachlin C.J................. 29 2.3 Strands of Multiculturalism Theories in Canadian Law................................................... 32 2.3.1 Federal Legislation................................................................................................ 32 2.3.2 Provincial Legislation ........................................................................................... 40 2.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 45 Chapter 3 Canadian Approaches through the Case Law .............................................................. 46 3 Canadian Approaches through the Case Law .......................................................................... 46 3.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 46 3.2 Shared Physical Spaces..................................................................................................... 47 3.2.1 Shared Ownership................................................................................................. 47 iv 3.2.2 The Character of Public Spaces ............................................................................ 52 3.2.3 Organizing Spaces: Zoning Disputes.................................................................... 57 3.3 Shared Institutions ............................................................................................................ 66 3.3.1 Town Councils and Legislatures........................................................................... 67 3.3.2 Courthouses........................................................................................................... 73 3.3.3 Schools.................................................................................................................. 76 3.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 97 Chapter 4 Legal Doctrine through the Multiculturalism Lens.................................................... 100 4 Legal Doctrine through the Multiculturalism Lens................................................................ 100 4.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 100 4.2 The Individualism of Rights Analysis ............................................................................ 101 4.3 Avoiding Coercion.......................................................................................................... 108 4.3.1 The Controversial Unity of Rights Language..................................................... 110 4.3.2 Simplifying Complex People.............................................................................. 115 4.4 Tolerance......................................................................................................................... 118 4.4.1 The Marginalizing Tendencies of Tolerance ...................................................... 120 4.4.2 Tolerance as Mask .............................................................................................. 123 4.5 Hierarchies of Rights ...................................................................................................... 126 4.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 130 Chapter 5 Focus on Difference: A Way Out of the Rights Conundrum? ................................... 132 5 Focus on Difference: A Way out of the Rights Conundrum?................................................ 132 5.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 132 5.2 Minow’s Alternate Approach to Difference ................................................................... 133 5.3 Difference-Based Approaches in Practice: Freedom of Religion................................... 138 5.3.1 Shared Physical Spaces....................................................................................... 139 5.3.2 Shared Institutions .............................................................................................. 143 v 5.3.3 Process in General............................................................................................... 145 5.4 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 147 Chapter 6 Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 149 6 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................. 149 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 151 vi Chapter 1 Canadian Multiculturalism and Freedom of Religion 1 Canadian Multiculturalism and Freedom of Religion 1.1 Introduction Canada’s population is increasingly diverse. Its citizens and residents come from a multitude of backgrounds; they bear different national heritages, speak different languages, assert multiple cultural identities and adhere to many religions.1 In response to these social facts, the Canadian state has chosen to celebrate diversity in its Constitution and in other legislation. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that it “shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians.”2 What’s more, unlike many other countries with diverse populations, Canada has enacted legislation
Recommended publications
  • Ottawa Gives $2 Million for Hansen Fellow Plan
    yBC t\i-chW*s Seiial Enrolment highest in history By PAULA MARTIN "It certainly Enrolment at UBC for 1989-90 has indicates a trend. hit its highest level ever and admissions Engineering is an applications have risen significantly over example of a previous years, figures compiled by the professional pro­ Registrar's Office show. gram that is re­ UBC's winter session enrolment is ally cyclical in up by 2.2 per cent or 612 students over terms of de­ last year, said Registrar Richard Spencer. mand." "This is the largest enrolment we've The Applied ever had," said Spencer of the 28,461 ScienceFaculty's Spencer students now studying at UBC. "It was School of Nurs­ partly by design because we did set out ing saw a 35 per cent increase in first to take in more graduate students and year enrolment, largely due to the incor­ slightly more undergraduates." poration of VGH' s nursing program into About three-quarters of the 28,461 the UBC program. are full-time students and the rest are Enrolment in the Faculty of Graduate classified as part-time—those who take Studies went up by 200 students, or just less than 80 per cent of a full program. under five per cent. The number of Undergraduate admissions applica­ graduate students for this year stands at tions went up seven per cent over last 4,408. year and 30 per cent over 1987, Spencer The Faculty of Commerce and Busi­ said. ness Administration enroled 420 stu­ "When you look at an institution like dents in the first year of its program, 20 UBC, which has an enrolment limit, more than last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestics' Cross-Cultural News Monthly Newsletter of the International Coalition to End Domestics' Exploitation
    -Domestics' Cross-Cultural News monthly newsletter of the International Coalition to End Domestics' Exploitation AUGUST 1986 INTERCEDE PROTESTS 'RELEASE LETTERS' A DOMESTIC WORKER SPEAKS OUT! INTERCEDE has recently written to Recently the Service Unit handled a officials of the Canada Employment complaint from a foreign domestic & Immigration Commission to protest worker who was refused permission the use of so-called 'release let- to find a new job because her form- ters' at a local immigration offi- er employer would not give her a ce in Toronto. 'release letter'. At issue is the fact that foreign Elke Weltle came to Canada from Ger- domestic workers are being denied many in December 1985, to work for the right to seek new employment if a family in Thornhill. After failing their former employers refuse to in her attempts to resolve problems give them 'release letters' saying with her employers, she gave them that their services are no longer three week's notice last June and required. left. She has been unable to work for the past three months because If a domestic worker cannot produ- the employer refuses to give her a ce such a letter when she reports 'release letter'. to the Canada .Immigration Centre - even is she left her employer for INTERCEDE appealed to immigration of- a legitimate reason - she is being ficials on her behalf and arrange- told that she can remain in Canada ments have now been made for her to until her visa expires but cannot go to Buffalo, New York, and re-en- work. ter Canada under the Foreign Domestic Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicare and Beyond: a 21St Century Vision, Saskatoon
    Medicare and Beyond A 21st Century Vision Speaking notes for The Hon. Roy J. Romanow, P.C., O.C., S.O.M., Q.C. Chair, Canadian Index of Wellbeing Advisory Board Senior Fellow, Political Studies, University of Saskatchewan; Atkinson Economic Justice Fellow; Commissioner on the Future of Health Care in Canada; Former Premier of Saskatchewan To Canadian Doctors of Medicare 25th Anniversary Celebration of the Canada Health Act Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada August 16, 2009 [Document from http://ciw.ca] 1. Introduction Good evening everyone. It’s wonderful to join you on this historic evening celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Canada Health Act. Let me start by thanking Canadian Doctors for Medicare for your kind invitation to speak. Thank you Ryan (Meili) for your warm introduction. I’ve come to accept that the older I get the more my introductions sound like eulogies, but let me assure you I have miles to go before I sleep. I can’t think of a better place to mark this anniversary. Many of you know that I’m a Saskatoon native, born and bred, and I take pride in the fact that the Broadway Theatre is community-owned and operated. Those of you who are from other parts of the country may not know that this theatre was built in 1945, the very same year that the Province of Saskatchewan issued government health-care cards to all pensioners, all women on mother's allowance, and all disabled people in Saskatchewan, entitling them to full medicare coverage including drugs. I’m very pleased to be here, and I’m even more pleased to serve as Danielle Martin’s warm-up act.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection: Green, Max: Files Box: 42
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Green, Max: Files Folder Title: Briefing International Council of the World Conference on Soviet Jewry 05/12/1988 Box: 42 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name GREEN, MAX: FILES Withdrawer MID 11/23/2001 File Folder BRIEFING INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL & THE WORLD FOIA CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY 5/12/88 F03-0020/06 Box Number THOMAS 127 DOC Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions NO Pages 1 NOTES RE PARTICIPANTS 1 ND B6 2 FORM REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENTS 1 5/11/1988 B6 Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified Information [(b)(1) of the FOIA) B-2 Release would disclose Internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA) B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA) B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial Information [(b)(4) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted Invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA) B-7 Release would disclose Information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would disclose Information concerning the regulation of financial Institutions [(b)(B) of the FOIA) B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical Information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA) C.
    [Show full text]
  • 970 Canada Year Book 1980-81 the Senate
    970 Canada Year Book 1980-81 The Hon. Charles Ronald McKay Granger, The Hon. Monique Begin, September 15,1976 September 25, 1967 TheHon. Jean-Jacques Blais, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Bryce Stuart Mackasey, February 9, 1968 The Hon. Francis Fox, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Donald Stovel Macdonald, April 20, The Hon. Anthony Chisholm Abbott, September 1968 15,1976 The Hon. John Can- Munro, April 20, 1968 TheHon. lonaCampagnolo, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Gerard Pelletier, April 20, 1968 The Hon. Joseph-Philippe Guay, November 3, The Hon. Jack Davis, April 26, 1968 1976 The Hon. Horace Andrew (Bud) Olson, July 6, The Hon. John Henry Horner, April 21,1977 1968 The Hon. Norman A, Cafik, September 16, 1977 The Hon. Jean-Eudes Dube, July 6, 1968 The Hon, J. Gilles Lamontagne, January 19, 1978 The Hon. Stanley Ronald Basford, July 6, 1968 The Hon. John M. Reid, November 24, 1978 The Hon. Donald Campbell Jamieson, July 6, 1968 The Hon. Pierre De Bane, November 24, 1978 The Hon. Eric William Kierans, July 6, 1968 The Rt. Hon. Jutes Leger, June 1, 1979 The Rt. Hon. Joe Clark, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Robert Knight Andras, July 6, 1968 The Hon. Walter David Baker, June 4, 1979 The Hon. James Armstrong Richardson, July 6, The Hon. Flora MacDonald, June 4, 1979 1968 The Hon James A. McGrath, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Otto Emil Lang, July 6, 1968 The Hon, Erik H. Nielsen, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Herbert Eser Gray, October 20, 1969 The Hon. Allan Frederick Lawrence, June 4, 1979 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Fa.Wpd
    Manuscript Division des Division manuscrits THE RT. HON. JOE CLARK FONDS FONDS DU TRÈS HONORABLE JOE CLARK MG 26 R Finding Aid No. 2076 / Instrument de recherche no 2076 Prepared in 1999 by Grace Hyam of the Préparé en 1999 par Grace Hyam de la Political Archival Section. Section des archives politique. Table of Contents File lists, by series and sub-series: Pages R 1 MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT SERIES R 1-1 Member of Parliament, 1972-1976, Correspondence Sub-series .......... 1-22 R 1-2 Member of Parliament, 1972-1976, Subject files Sub-series ............ 23-45 R 1-3 Member of Parliament, 1983-1984, Sub-series ....................... 46-51 R 2 LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, 1976-1979, SERIES R 2-1 Correspondence Sub-series ............................... 52-264 R 2-2 Subject Files Sub-series................................. 265-282 R 2-3 Staff - Jim Hawkes Sub-series............................ 283-294 R 2-4 Joe Clark Personal Sub-series ............................ 295-296 R 2-5 Staff - Ian Green Sub-series.............................. 297-301 R 2-6 Staff - Bill Neville Sub-series ............................ 302-304 R 3 PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE SERIES R 3-1 PMO Correspondence Sub-series ......................... 305-321 R 3-2 PMO Correspondence - Indexes Sub-series ................. 322-323 R 3-3 PMO Subject files Sub-series ............................ 324-331 R 3-4 PMO Staff - Lorne Fox Sub-series ........................ 332-335 R 3-5 PMO Staff - Adèle Desjardins Sub-series................... 336-338 R 3-6 PMO Staff - Marjory LeBreton Sub-series .................. 339-341 R 3-7 PMO Communications Sub-series......................... 342-348 R 4 LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, 1980-1983, SERIES R 4-1 Correspondence Sub-series .............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1987
    f,KAI IS W N I [HRAR-I 01 L0NI3RI :SS .,, ,,vir: HE A1)1N(, K0OM WASHING ION DC -P-O-i IS Vol. LV No. 39 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 27,1987 25 cents U krainian delegation discusses Terelia family arrives in Amsterdam pressing iSSUeS With Mulroney Expected in Canada next week by Michael Bodnririw Nations General Assembly in New - AMSTERDAM — Ukrainian Ca­ York. tholic lay leader and former political OTTAWA — Prime Minister Brian The meeting was the result of a "long­ prisoner Yosyp Terelia and his family Mulroney and three members of the standing commitment'* made by Prime spent their first week in freedom in the federal Cabinet met with a delegation of Minister Mulroney to meet with Ukrai­ Netherlands after arriving here on a Ukrainian community leaders here on nian community leaders, said Vera flight from Moscow on September 18, September 22. Holiad, a spokesman for the prime reported several sources. The 90-minute meeting, held in the minister's office. The 43-year-old dissident left the prime minister's Parliament Hill office, Dr. Cipywnyk and the prime mi­ Soviet Union with his wife, Olena, and was requested by the Ukrainian Cana­ nister's office refused to disclose details three children, Marianna, Kalyna and dian Committee to help smooth rela­ of the meeting. But sources said the Pavlo, on a Dutch visa after the go­ tions between the federal government discussions included five main points. vernment's help in efforts on the and the Ukrainian community. The They were: Terelias* behalf ended in their emigra­ delegation also presented a list of • The prosecution of war criminals tion, according to the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Japanese, Redress, and the Power of Archives R.L
    The Canadian Japanese, Redress, and the Power of Archives R.L. Gabrielle Nishiguchi (Library and Archives Canada) [Originally entitled: From the Shadows of the Second World War: Archives, Records and Cana- dian Japanese]1 I am a government records archivist at Library and Archives Canada2 who practises macro- appraisal. It should be noted that the ideas of former President of the Bundesarchiv, Hans Booms3, inspired Canadian Terry Cook, the father of macro-appraisal -which has been the appraisal approach of my institution since 1991. “If there is indeed anything or anyone qualified to lend legitimacy to archival appraisal,” Hans Booms wrote in 1972, ‘it is society itself….”4 As Cook asserts, Booms was “perhaps the first 1 This Paper was delivered on 15 October 2019 at the Conference: “Kriegsfolgenarchivgut: Entschädigung, Lasten- ausgleich und Wiedergutmachung in Archivierung und Forschung” hosted by the Bundesarchiv, at the Bundesar- chiv-Lastenausgleichsarchiv, Bayreuth, Germany. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this paper belong solely to the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Library and Archives Canada. 2 Library and Archives Canada had its beginnings in 1872 as the Archives Branch of the Department of Agriculture. In 1903, the Archives absorbed the Records Branch of the Department of the Secretary of State. It was recognized by statute as the Public Archives of Canada in 1912 and continued under this name until 1987 when it became the National Archives of Canada as per the National Archives of Canada Act, R.S.C. , 1985, c. 1 (3rd Supp.), accessed 10 January 2020. In 2004, the National Archives of Canada and the National Library of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Two-Axe Earley Won Rights for Natives Across Country Page 21
    Quebec Heritage News March 2003 Volume 2, Number 3 Page 1 In this issue Richard Evans: Our stereotypes change through the years Page2 QAHN annual meeting June 14 at Bishop’s Page 3 history workshop will open doors for amateurs, professionals Page 4 Phelpsaward:It’snottoolate! Page5 This year’s school contest: Toys of the 20th century Page 5 Schools, research centre join QAHN oral history project Page 6 Women’s happenings around Quebec Page 22 Members’ events & activities Page 23 New status to protect Mount Royal park Page 24 Some Mount Royal milestones since 1535 Page 25 Volunteer helps North Shore village discover past Page 26 Bedford teacher’s cemetery quest begins to pay off Page 27 Gleanings from the list serve Page 28 Book review: A Jerseyman comes to Canada Page 30 FSHQ to hold convention in Charlevoix Page 30 QAHN membership information and form Page 31 Can QAHN help you? Page 32 Wanted: Proposals for historic cities meet in Montreal Page 32 Eyes Wide Open – anglo community action forum set for April Page 32 Women in history – a special section Saving the little ones: The heroism of Sarah Maxwell Page 7 Greenwood: ‘Phoebe would have been so proud’ Page 8 Herstory: Lives of women on the web Page 9 Quebec woman’s plan foresaw League of Nations, U.N. Page 10 Elsie Reford used influence to work behind the scenes Page 14 Elizabeth Wand put Ste. Agathe on health care map Page 16 Information wanted on Shaker wheel Page 17 Three Mohawk heroes Kateri Tekakwitha – North America’s first saint? Page 18 Waneek Horn-Miller made history as a child, an athlete and a woman Page 20 Mary Two-Axe Earley won rights for natives across country Page 21 Bulletin of the Quebec Anglophone Heritage Network Page 2 Quebec HeritageNews M arch 2003 President’s message Heritage contest will tell tales with toys of the times Our stereotypes change through the years early a year ago we decided in favour of The build-up of the railway industry in Montreal having these newsletters have a contributed to an important community of Ndominant theme.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Program
    THE AUSTRALIA-CANADA ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP FORUM st Renewing the Partnership for the 21 Century July 23-25, 2012 in Toronto, Canada INTRODUCTION and PROGRAM The Australia-Canada Economic Leadership Forum is a summit of private and public sector leaders from both countries. The inaugural Forum was launched with great success in 2010 in Sydney, Australia. The goal of the Forum is to foster a high level and frank exchange on issues and challenges of mutual interest to Australia and Canada – partners and allies who share common historical roots and values, among them, respect for freedom and the rule of law, and the advancement of international peace and security. The 2012 Forum will address a wide variety of subjects that are top of mind in both countries: competitiveness and international trade priorities; approaches to global economic recovery following a devastating economic and financial crisis; responses to immense opportunities and transformational change in the Asia-Pacific region; and leading edge policies for harnessing technological change. Given that Australia and Canada are blessed with an abundance of natural resources, the Toronto meetings also will address topical issues such as global food policy, the supply of minerals and energy in a resource constrained world, and the regulation of foreign investment. It is often said that there are no two countries more alike than Australia and Canada and yet our relationship is marked by a great deal of unfulfilled potential. The Forum’s mission is to move our two countries much closer together and the Toronto meetings on July 23-25 will serve as an important catalyst in advancing our cause.
    [Show full text]
  • I – Les Relations Extérieures Du Canada Hélène Galarneau
    Document généré le 29 sept. 2021 21:31 Études internationales I – Les relations extérieures du Canada Hélène Galarneau Volume 18, numéro 2, 1987 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/702170ar DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/702170ar Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Institut québécois des hautes études internationales ISSN 0014-2123 (imprimé) 1703-7891 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Galarneau, H. (1987). I – Les relations extérieures du Canada. Études internationales, 18(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.7202/702170ar Tous droits réservés © Études internationales, 1987 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ CHRONIQUE DES RELATIONS EXTÉRIEURES DU CANADA ET DU QUÉBEC Hélène GALARNEAU* I — Les relations extérieures du Canada (janvier à mars 1987) A — Aperçu général Le gouvernement canadien poursuivait au cours de l'hiver ses efforts contre l'apartheid, notamment en manifestant son appui aux doléances exprimées par les dirigeants de six pays africains, dont trois de la ligne de front, lors de la visite du premier ministre Mulroney au Zimbabwe et au Sénégal. L'intérêt marqué du gouvernement pour le développement de liens serrés avec l'Asie ne se démentait guère non plus lors des trois derniers mois, comme en témoignaient le voyage du secrétaire d'État aux Affaires extérieures, M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legislative History of Bill C-31, 1969–19851 Gerard Hartley
    1 The Search for Consensus: A Legislative History of Bill C-31, 1969–19851 Gerard Hartley Introduction Canada’s 1985 Indian Act amendment, known as Bill C-31, was intended to eliminate discrimination against Indian women by creating a non-discriminatory legal criteria for defining “Indian” under the Act. Before 1985, Indian status under the Indian Act was based on a patrilineal system in which a woman’s status was dependent on her father or husband’s status. Therefore Indian women who married Indian men retained their legal status, whereas Indian women who married non-Indian men lost their legal status and their ability to transmit status to their children. Indian men who married non-Indian women, however, not only retained their status, but also transmitted it to their wives and children. The pre-1985 Indian Act provision that removed status from Indian women who “married out” is known as section 12(1)(b). Many Aboriginal women viewed section 12(1)(b) as a blatant form of discrimi- nation. However, when Aboriginal women’s groups began their long campaign in the early 1970s to pressure the government to amend the Indian Act, Canadians were generally unaware of and uninterested in their plight. But by the early 1980s, the problem of discrimination against Indian women was widely condemned in Canada and no longer considered acceptable in a society that valued equal rights and equal treatment for everyone. This paper examines the legislative history of Bill C-31 and describes the social and political context in which federal Indian Act policy developed during the period from 1969 to 1985.
    [Show full text]