Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents Final Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 1-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1-1 B. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................ 1-1 C. BACKGROUND........................................................................................ 1-11 D. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED...................................................................... 1-12 E. PROPOSED BUILDING PROGRAM AND DESIGN ................................................... 1-16 F. REQUIRED ACTIONS AND APPROVALS ............................................................. 1-36 G. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS AND RELATED LAND USE REVIEWS ...................... 1-39 2.0 LAND USE, ZONING, AND PUBLIC POLICY.............................................. 2-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 2-1 B. BACKGROUND.......................................................................................... 2-3 C. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 2-4 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................... 2-12 E. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................ 2-15 3.0 SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 3-1 B. DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY................................................................... 3-2 C. INITIAL SCREENING ASSESSMENT................................................................... 3-6 D. DETAILED ASSESSMENT .............................................................................. 3-8 E. VARIATIONS.......................................................................................... 3-34 4.0 NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER ................................................................ 4-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 4-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 4-3 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION.......................................... 4-7 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION .............................................. 4-8 E. VARIATIONS.......................................................................................... 4-10 5.0 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES ............................................... 5-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 5-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 5-2 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION........................................ 5-10 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................ 5-15 E. VARIATIONS.......................................................................................... 5-17 6.0 OPEN SPACE........................................................................................... 6-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 6-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 6-2 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................... 6-6 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION .............................................. 6-8 E. VARIATIONS.......................................................................................... 6-15 7.0 SHADOWS .............................................................................................. 7-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 7-1 B. IDENTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE RECEPTORS........................................................ 7-2 C. SHADOW EFFECTS..................................................................................... 7-3 D. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 7-4 SILVERCUP WEST FEIS i FEIS Table of Contents E. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................... 7-4 F. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION .............................................. 7-4 G. CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................7-13 H. VARIATIONS ..........................................................................................7-13 8.0 HISTORIC RESOURCES........................................................................... 8-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 8-1 B. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 8-3 C. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 8-3 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................... 8-8 E. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION .............................................. 8-9 F. VARIATIONS ..........................................................................................8-16 9.0 TRAFFIC AND PARKING ......................................................................... 9-1 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 9-1 B. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (YEAR 2003) ................................................... 9-2 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION (NO BUILD CONDITION – YEAR 2009) 9-16 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION (BUILD CONDITION – YEAR 2009) ..9-31 E. TRAFFIC MITIGATION (YEAR 2009) ...............................................................9-53 F. ASSESSMENT OF VARIATIONS.......................................................................9-61 10.0 TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIANS ............................................................... 10-1 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................10-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................10-1 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION......................................10-17 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION...........................................10-22 E. TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIAN MITIGATION (2009)...............................................10-29 F. ASSESSMENT OF VARIATIONS.....................................................................10-30 11.0 AIR QUALITY ....................................................................................... 11-1 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................11-1 B. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS ...........................................................................11-1 C. POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN ..........................................................................11-3 D. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ......................................................11-5 E. EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................11-6 F. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................11-12 G. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION...........................................11-13 H. VARIATIONS ........................................................................................11-22 12.0 NOISE .................................................................................................. 12-1 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................12-1 B. NOISE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................12-2 C. CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................12-29 D. VARIATIONS ........................................................................................12-29 13.0 INFRASTRUCTURE................................................................................ 13-1 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................13-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................13-1 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ........................................13-3 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED ACTION.............................................13-3 E. VARIATIONS ..........................................................................................13-5 SILVERCUP WEST FEIS ii FEIS Table of Contents 14.0 SOLID WASTE AND SANITATION SERVICES......................................... 14-1 A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 14-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................. 14-1 C. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................... 14-1 D. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED
Recommended publications
  • • the Activation of OMNY Readers at the Queensboro Plaza Station in Queens Marks the Completion of the Line and the Halfway Po
    The activation of OMNY readers at the Queensboro Plaza station in Queens marks the completion of the line and the halfway point in the MTA's effort to activate OMNY at all 472 subway stations in the system. OMNY installation remains set to be completed by the end of the year at all subway stations and on all MTA-operated buses. A list of all subway stations and bus routes where OMNY is currently in use is at this link: https://omny.info/system-rollout In March, the MTA announced OMNY had surpassed 10 million taps. In 2021, the MTA will introduce an OMNY card at retail locations throughout the New York region. Also in 2021, the MTA will begin to install new vending machines at locations throughout the system. OMNY readers accept contactless cards from companies such as Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover, as well as digital wallets such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay, and Fitbit Pay. Following the completion of OMNY installation at all subway turnstiles and on buses, the MTA will introduce all remaining fare options, including unlimited ride passes, reduced fares, student fares, and more. Only after OMNY is fully available everywhere MetroCard is today, expected in 2023, will the MTA say goodbye to the MetroCard. The MetroCard was first tested in the system in 1993, debuting to the larger public in January 1994. All turnstiles were MetroCard-enabled by May 1997 and all buses began accepting it by the end of 1995. Tokens were sold until April 2003 and acceptance was discontinued that May in subway stations and that December on buses.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2019 from Astoria to Lower Manhattan and Back
    100Days and 100Nights From Astoria to Lower Manhattan and Back March 2019 NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT RIDERS COUNCIL 1 2 NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT RIDERS COUNCIL Acknowledgments PCAC report producers Ellyn Shannon, Associate Director Bradley Brashears, Planning Manager Sheila Binesh, Transportation Planner Shaun Wong, Data Intern Uday Schultz, Field Intern Special thanks to Lisa Daglian, Executive Director William Henderson, Executive Director Emeritus Andrew Albert, NYCTRC Chair Angela Bellisio Kyle Wong Candy Chan NYC Transit staff NYCTRC Council Members: Burton M. Strauss Jr., Stuart Goldstein, Christopher Greif, William K. Guild, Marisol Halpern, Sharon King Hoge, Trudy L. Mason, Scott R. Nicolls, and Edith M. Prentiss 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................ 3 AM/PM PEAK FINDINGS.................................................................................................... 7 AM RIDER EXPERIENCE..................................................................................................... 8 AM RIDER EXPERIENCE: REAL-TIME DATA.......................................................................... 19 PM RIDER EXPERIENCE....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Based on OEM Emergency Notifications
    timeline Based on OEM Emergency Notifications Record ID Date and Time NotificationType 103 10/24/2009 12:00:00 AM Transportation 104 10/24/2009 12:00:00 AM Utility 105 10/26/2009 12:00:00 AM zINACTIMass Transit Disruption 106 10/26/2009 12:00:00 AM Transportation 107 10/26/2009 12:00:00 AM Utility 108 10/28/2009 12:00:00 AM zINACTIVE *Fire 109 10/28/2009 12:00:00 AM Emergency Activity 110 10/29/2009 05:00:00 PM zINACTIVE * Aerial (Fly-Over) 111 10/31/2009 12:00:00 AM zINACTIVE *Fire 112 11/01/2009 12:00:00 AM Emergency Activity 113 11/02/2009 12:00:00 AM zINACTIVE *Structural 114 11/03/2009 12:00:00 AM Transportation 115 11/03/2009 12:00:00 AM Utility Page 1 of 1419 10/02/2021 timeline Based on OEM Emergency Notifications Notification Title [blank] [blank] [blank] [blank] Major Gas Explosion 32-25 Leavitt St. [blank] [blank] [blank] [blank] [blank] [blank] [blank] [blank] Page 2 of 1419 10/02/2021 timeline Based on OEM Emergency Notifications Email Body Notification 1 issued on 10/24/09 at 11:15 AM. Emergency personnel are on the scene of a motor vehicle accident involving FDNY apparatus on Ashford Street and Hegeman Avenue in Brooklyn. Ashford St is closed between New Lots Ave and Linden Blvd. Hegeman Ave is closed from Warwick St to Cleveland St. Notification 1 issued 10/24/2009 at 6:30 AM. Emergency personnel are on scene at a water main break in the Fresh Meadows section of Queens.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLAZA PARK Bringing Long Island City to New Heights
    THE PLAZA PARK Bringing Long Island City To New Heights BRIXTON MANOR CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Offering Memorandum has been prepared by Brixton Manor use by a limited number of parties and has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it, and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to confirm, independently, its accuracy and completeness. All projections have been developed by Brixton Manor, Owner and designated sources, are based upon assumptions relating to the general economy, competition, and other factors beyond the control of Owner, and therefore are subject to variation. No representation is made by Brixton Manor or Owner as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and nothing contained herein is or shall be relied on as a promise or representation as to the future performance of the property. Although the information contained herein is believed to be correct, Owner and its employees disclaim any responsibility for inaccuracies and expect prospective purchasers to exercise independent due diligence in verifying all such information. Further, Brixton Manor, Owner and its employees disclaim any and all liability for representations and warranties, expressed and implied, contained in, or for omissions from, the Offering Memorandum or any other written or oral communication transmitted or made available to the recipient. The Offering Memorandum does not constitute a representation that there has been no change in the business or affairs of the property or Owner since the date of preparation of the Offering Memorandum. Analysis and verification of the information contained in the Offering Memorandum is solely the responsibility of the prospective purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Conditions March 28, 2016
    Long Island City Comprehensive Plan: Phase 1 Existing Conditions March 28, 2016 Prepared by: BJH Advisors for the Long Island City Partnership Long Island City Comprehensive Plan: Phase 1 Existing Conditions Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 4 Introduction and Purpose ......................................................................................... 4 Study Area Characteristics ................................................................................ 5 Neighborhood Sub-Areas ......................................................................................... 5 Transportation Infrastructure and Usage ......................................................... 9 Public Transportation ............................................................................................... 9 Pedestrian Bridges and Connections ..................................................................... 10 Highway, Bridge and Tunnel Infrastructure ............................................................ 15 Bicycles.................................................................................................................. 18 Commuting Patterns .............................................................................................. 19 Parking Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 20 Broadband Internet Infrastructure..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • February 2007 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2007 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 50, No. 2 February, 2007 The Bulletin 90 YEARS OF SUBWAY SERVICE TO ASTORIA Published by the New York Division, Electric The first Astoria train was a special train The Commission adopted a resolution direct- Railroaders’ Association, that departed from Grand Central at 2 PM ing the preparation of plans and form of con- Incorporated, PO Box February 1, 1917. On board were city offi- tract for the Astoria Line and the Corona Line 3001, New York, New cials, borough officials, members of the Pub- on June 14, 1912. The form of contract was York 10008-3001. lic Service Commission, and Interborough adopted on December 17, 1912 and a public Rapid Transit Company officials. There were hearing was scheduled for January 4, 1913. For general inquiries, special celebrations near the new line. The Municipal Art Commission approved the contact us at nydiv@ Houses and commercial buildings were type of structure on December 27, 1912. Bids electricrailroaders.org draped with flags and whistles were blown. were received on January 28, 1913 and the or by phone at (212) 986-4482 (voice mail When the train arrived at Ditmars Boulevard, contract was awarded to the Cooper and Ev- available). ERA’s the passengers alighted, and the train and ans Company for $860,743.50. The contract w e b s i t e i s guests were photographed. Members of the for station finish was let to Charles Mead and www.electricrailroaders. Steinway Civic Association took the guests in Company at a cost of $268,102.50.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Scale of Miles E 177Th St E 163Rd St 3Rd Ave 3Rd Ave 3Rd a Ve
    New York City Subway: IND Second System Track Map Service Guide 1: 2nd Avenue Subway (1929-Present) 10: IND Fulton St Line Extensions (1920s-1960s) 8th Av, Fulton St Exp. 6th Av Local, Rockaway, Staten Island Lcl. 2 Av Lcl, Broadway Exp, Brighton Beach Locl. 7th Av Local. The 2nd Ave Subway has been at the heart of every expansion proposal since the IND Second The IND Fulton St Subway was a major trunk line built to replace the elevated BMT Fulton St-Liberty Ave 207 St to Jamaica-168 St, Bay Ridge-86 St to Jacob Riis-Beach 149 St. 2 Av-96 St to Stillwell Av-Coney Island. Van Cortlandt Park-242 St to South Ferry. System was first announced. The line has been redesigned countless times, from a 6-track trunk line. The subway was largely built directly below the elevated structure it replaced. It was initially A Queens Village-Sprigfield Blvd. H Q 1 line to the simple 2-track branch we have today. The map depicts the line as proposed in 1931 designed as a major through route to southern Queens. Famously, the Nostrand Ave station was with 6 tracks from 125th St to 23rd St, a 2-track branch through Alphabet City into Williamsburg, 4 originally designed to only be local to speed up travel for riders coming from Queens; it was converted to 8th Av, Fulton St Exp. Brooklyn-Queens Crosstown Local. 2 Av Lcl, Broadway Exp, Brighton Beach Locl. 7th Av Exp. tracks from 23rd St to Canal St, a 2-track branch to South Williamsburg, and 2 tracks through the an express station when ambitions cooled.
    [Show full text]
  • 51-02 Roosevelt Avenue Sunnyside
    51-02 ROOSEVELT AVENUE SUNNYSIDE ~125K BSF DEVELOPMENT SITE ALONG THE 7 TRAIN 51-02 ROOSEVELT AVE Corner Development Site with 300’+ of Frontage PROPERTY OVERVIEW INQUIRE FOR PRICING GUIDANCE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Cushman & Wakefield has been exclusively retained to arrange for the sale of 51-02 Roosevelt Avenue, Woodside. The property is a ~125,000 BSF development site along “The Healthiest and Most Stable Retail Corridor in NYC”, according to the Department of City Planning’s 2019 report. 51-02 Roosevelt Avenue features a 26,000 SF lot with over 300’ of frontage and is located one block from the intersection of Roosevelt and Queens Boulevard, with an average daily traffic count of 50,000+ vehicles. Furthermore, the 52nd Street-Lincoln Avenue Entrance/Exit is located directly in front of the property. 51-02 Roosevelt Avenue is accessible via the B32, Q60, and Q104 bus lines and is in direct proximity to Broadway, Northern Boulevard, the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway and Long Island Expressway. This is a rare opportunity to acquire one of the last large corner development sites in a neighborhood with the statistically strongest retail that still has untapped potential. For further information, please contact the Exclusive Brokers. Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2019-2020. No warranty or representation, express or implied, is made to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and the same is submitted suject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice, and to any special listing conditions imposed by the property owner(s). As applicable, we make no representation as to the condition of the property (or properties) in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Kills Neighborhood Located in Long Island City, Queens
    CHAPTER 16: TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIANS A. INTRODUCTION This chapter of the EIS describes the transit and pedestrian characteristics and potential impacts associated with the proposed actions, which involve zoning map and text amendments for an area encompassing 36 whole and four partial blocks in the Dutch Kills neighborhood located in Long Island City, Queens. The rezoning area, which is adjacent to the Sunnyside Yards and just north of Queens Plaza and the Long Island City central business district (CBD), is generally bounded by 36th Avenue on the north, 41st Avenue on the south, Northern Boulevard on the east, and 23rd Street on the west (see Figure 15-1). As described in detail in earlier chapters of this EIS, the goals of the proposed zoning map and text amendments are to encourage moderate and higher density development near public transportation, and to support continued economic growth in a mixed-use residential, commercial and light industrial community. Overall, the proposed zoning changes would result in an increase in permitted residential density on approximately 50 acres of land, representing 72 percent of the rezoning area, and a decrease in commercial and light industrial density on 39 acres of land representing approximately 53 percent of the rezoning area. Approximately 20 acres, or about 30 percent of the rezoning area would experience no change in permitted residential density, but residential development would be permitted as-of-right. The transportation analyses in this EIS address a development program that could reasonably be constructed by 2017. The analyses in this chapter focus on the subway and local bus modes operated by MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) and MTA Bus, as well as pedestrian trips generated by the 40 projected development sites defined in the Reasonable Worst Case Development Scenario (RWCDS) in Chapter 1, “Project Description.” The locations of the 40 projected development sites and their anticipated uses are shown in Figure 1-6 and listed in Table 1-3 in Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Laguardia Community College the E Building Is
    Directions to LaGuardia Community College The E Building is conveniently located on the corner of Van Dam and Thomson Avenue. The E Building is a mere 3 minute walk from the 33rd and Rawson stop on the 7 train. By Subway Via 7 Train: Get off at 33rd Street station. Walk two blocks westbound to Thomson Avenue and Van Dam Street. Via E, V & R Trains: Get off at Queens Plaza Station and exit the station at Jackson Avenue and Queens Boulevard exit. Walk over the Queens Boulevard Bridge (over the Sunnyside train yards) until you reach the corner of Van Dam Street and Thomson Avenue. Via G Train: Get off at Court Square Station (at the CitiCorp Building). Walk across the Thomson Avenue Bridge. Via N & W Trains: At Queensboro Plaza station transfer to 7 Train (Local to Main Street) and get off at the 33rd Street station. Walk two blocks westbound to Thomson Avenue and Van Dam Street. Via the Long Island Railroad: Take the LIRR to Hunters Point Station, transfer to a Flushing-bound local 7 train and get off at 33rd St. Or, alternatively, take the LIRR to Woodside Station, transfer to a Manhattan-bound local 7 train and get off at 33rd St. You can also walk from the Hunters Point Station along Skillman Avenue to Thomson Avenue, make a right and walk to the E building. By Bus From Queens: Take the Q60 or Q32 to Queens Boulevard and Skillman Avenue. Walk one block west to corner of Van Dam Street and Thomson Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Silvercup Main from BROOKLYN
    Directions to Silvercup Main FROM BROOKLYN: Take the Brooklyn Queens Expressway north to the McGuiness-Humbolt exit. Make a left at the bottom of the ramp onto McGuiness Avenue going over the Pulaski Bridge and then straight across Jackson Avenue. Go straight onto 11th Street. Make a right when you reach Queens Plaza South. Go three blocks to 22nd Street and turn right. Silvercup is on the right and the parking lot is on the left. FROM LONG ISLAND Via Long Island Expressway: Take the LIE west and get off at the Van Dam Street exit (the last exit before the tolls for the Midtown Tunnel). Make a right onto Van Dam Street and proceed three lights to Thomson Avenue. Make a left onto Thomson Avenue bearing to the left as you go over the Thompson Avenue Bridge (if you bear right, you'll turn onto the ramp for the Queensboro Bridge into Manhattan). Make a right onto 44th Drive and continue straight across Jackson Avenue past the Citicorp tower until you reach 21st Street. Make a right at 21st Street and turn right when you reach Queens Plaza South (just before the Queensboro/59th Street Bridge). Make a right onto 22nd Street/Harry Suna Place. Silvercup is on the right and the parking lot is on the left. Via Grand Central Parkway: Take the Grand Central west and take Exit 45 for 31st Street (the last exit before the Triboro Bridge). Make a left onto 31st Street and then a right onto Astoria Boulevard. Proceed to 21st street and make a left.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Queens BUS STUDY
    Northeast Queens BUS STUDY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 2015 , , Metropolitan Transportation Authority CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 65 SUMMARY OF CHANGES 1. INTRODUCTION 3 SHORT‐TERM RECOMMENDATIONS Methodology Service Change Characteristics of Northeast Queens Schedule Changes LONG‐TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 2. BUS SERVICE AND SCHEDULE 9 Service Changes Current Service Downtown Flushing Bus Terminal Service Coverage 2010 Service Changes 7. NEXT STEPS 72 Other Recent & Upcoming Service Changes Schedule Changes APPENDICES __ Appendix A ‐ Public Input Questions and Answers 3. BUS RIDERSHIP 23 Appendix B – Route Profiles 3‐Year Ridership Trend Appendix C – Additional Data 1‐Year Ridership Trend Senior/Student Ridership Bus Stop Usage Origins and Destinations Transfers Classifying Northeast Queens Bus Transfers 4. QUALITY OF SERVICE 42 PERFORMANCE Wait Assessment On‐Time Performance Running Time Road Reliability Bus Speeds Vision Zero COMFORT+ENVIRONMENT Passenger Environment Loading Guidelines Schedule Guidelines Bus Stop Furniture CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION 5. PUBLIC INPUT 55 Service Issues Schedules Issues Amenities and Facilities Issues Other Issues I , Metropolitan Transportation Authority LIST OF TABLES Table 37 – Passenger Environment Survey – Local & Table 1 – Travel Time to Work on Public Limited Transportation in NE Queens Table 38 – Passenger Environment Survey ‐ Express Table 2 – Bus Service Guidelines Table 39 – Current Loading Levels Compared to Table 3 – Bus Service Frequency Changes Loading Guidelines
    [Show full text]