New York City Maps
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System
Under the Big Apple: a Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System by Emma Marie Waterloo This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Tomlan,Michael Andrew (Chairperson) Chusid,Jeffrey M. (Minor Member) UNDER THE BIG APPLE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF PRESERVATION PRACTICE AND THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Emma Marie Waterloo August 2010 © 2010 Emma Marie Waterloo ABSTRACT The New York City Subway system is one of the most iconic, most extensive, and most influential train networks in America. In operation for over 100 years, this engineering marvel dictated development patterns in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. The interior station designs of the different lines chronicle the changing architectural fashion of the aboveground world from the turn of the century through the 1940s. Many prominent architects have designed the stations over the years, including the earliest stations by Heins and LaFarge. However, the conversation about preservation surrounding the historic resource has only begun in earnest in the past twenty years. It is the system’s very heritage that creates its preservation controversies. After World War II, the rapid transit system suffered from several decades of neglect and deferred maintenance as ridership fell and violent crime rose. At the height of the subway’s degradation in 1979, the decision to celebrate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the opening of the subway with a local landmark designation was unusual. -
Design a Subway Station Mosaic That Reflects Their Home Or School Neighborhood and Draw It
MILES OF TILES MILES OF TILES BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR TEACHERS “Design and aesthetics have been a part of the subway from the original stations of 1904 to the latest work in 2018. But nothing in New York stands still – certainly not the subway - and the approach to subway style has evolved, reflecting the major stages of the system’s construction during the early 1900s, the teens, and the late 20s and early 30s and the renovations and redesigns of later years. The earliest parts of the system still convey the flowery, genteel flavor of a smaller, older city. Later sections, by contrast, show a conscious turn toward the modern, including open admiration for the system’s raw structural power. The evolution of subway design follows the trajectory of the world of art and architecture as these came to terms with the Industrial revolution, and the tug-of-war between a traditional deference to European models and a modernist ideology demanding an honest expression of contemporary industrial technology.” —Subway style: 100 years of Architecture & Design in the New York City Subway New York City, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, was an industrial hub attracting many Americans from rural communities looking for work, and immigrants looking for better lives. It was, however, blighted by impoverished neighborhoods of broken down tenements and social injustice. The city lacked a plan for how it should look, where structures should be built, or how services should be distributed. It was described as a ‘ragged pincushion of towers’ with no government regulation over the urban landscape. -
Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown a Community Consensus Proposal
Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown A Community Consensus Proposal November 2016 Contents Executive Summary / 3 Summary of Recommendations / 3 Introduction / 6 Impact on Commuters and Residents / 8 Implications/how to prepare for the shutdown / 10 Impact on Businesses / 11 How much do local businesses depend on the L train? / 11 How to prepare for the shutdown / 11 Providing the Best Travel Alternatives / 12 Prepare adjacent subway lines for higher ridership / 12 New rapid bus services with dedicated preferential treatments and auto-free zones / 13 Transform streets in Brooklyn to better connect people and cyclists to transit / 17 Improve ferry service and reduce fares to serve Williamsburg residents / 18 Making the Most of the Shutdown: Transforming the L Train / 19 Capital improvements at five stations / 20 Timing and funding / 20 Procurement and design / 21 An Inclusive Process / 22 Community Profiles /23 Manhattan / 24 Williamsburg/Greenpoint / 25 Bushwick/Ridgewood / 26 East New York/Brownsville/Canarsie / 27 2 Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown: A Community Consensus Proposal | November 2016 Executive Summary The Metropolitan Transportation Authority has said it will shut ⊲ State Senator Martin M. Dilan down the L train tunnels under the East River for more than a ⊲ Council Member Stephen Levin year to repair the severe damage caused by Superstorm Sandy. ⊲ Council Member Antonio Reynoso That is grim news for the hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers ⊲ Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer who rely on the L and who will have few easy alternatives to get ⊲ Brooklyn Borrough President Eric L. Adams to where they’re going every day. -
March 2012 Photo Notes
The Newsletter of the Park West Camera Club Photo Notes Our 75th Year March/April 2012 Presidentʼs Letter Flower Power! Spring is in the air. It has actually been in the air for much of this past winter with temperatures in the 40s and 50s many days and abundant sun- shine, but for PWCC it means a time to speak anew of many things such as more field trips, the Club auction on April 9th, return of the Florida contingent, annual election of officers, planning the Otto Litzel Dinner and awards, short pants, sleeveless dresses, sandals, sun block, longer days for shooting pictures, Chuck’s Expanding Visions class, the Manhattan Borough President’s Office In This Issue show and whatever I’ve left out, such as shoes, ships, sealing wax, cabbages and kings1. President’s Letter.................................1 Who’s Who & What’s What........2 & 3 So instead of winding down, the Club is heating Club Info..................................3, 5 & 10 up, invigorated by the warmer weather and an- Rules of Photography..........................4 ticipation of all our upcoming events and activi- B&H Space............................................5 ties, photographic and otherwise. Competition...................................6 & 7 Sitzfleisch..............................................8 I’m particularly looking forward to the Otto Litzel Election Procedures.............................9 Dinner this year. It’s dedicated to the Club’s 75th Inquiries..............................................10 Anniversary and we’re still looking for sugges- Business Meeting Minutes................11 tions for a restaurant roomy enough to display Call for Entries...................................14 Club memorabilia or at least to project a slide- Expanding Visions 18........................15 show. Please give your suggestions to Sid Geor- Auction................................................16 giou. -
Reopening Closed Subway Entrances Using High Entry/Exit Turnstiles
REOPENING CLOSED SUBWAY ENTRANCES USING HIGH ENTRY/EXIT TURNSTILES Suggestions from the New York City Transit Riders Council November 2001 New York City Transit Riders Council 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 • www.pcac.org © 2001 NYCTRC Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methodology 2 Findings 3 Closed Fare Control Areas 3 Open Exit-Only Fare Control Areas 6 Open Fare Control Areas with HEETS but No MVMs 8 Summary of Recommendations 10 Appendix: Surveyed Stations 12 List of Tables Table One: Status of Fare Control Areas 3 Table Two: Closed Fare Control Areas 3 Table Three: Open Exit-Only Fare Control Areas 6 Table Four: Open Fare Control Areas With HEETs but No MVMs 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Council would like to thank former PCAC Transportation Planner Joshua Schank for his efforts in the research and writing of this report and Associate Director Mike Doyle for final editorial assistance. ABOUT US The New York City Transit Riders Council is the independent, legislatively mandated representative of NYC Transit riders. Our 15 volunteer members are regular users of the transit system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. The Council is an affiliate of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA. For more information about us, please visit our website at: www.pcac.org. INTRODUCTION New York subway stations tend to be quite large. Although these stations are often named after one cross street, the stations stretch so far that they often take up several blocks and multiple cross streets. -
Valley Forge Ins. Co. V Allstate Indem. Co
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v Allstate Indem. Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 31968(U) July 25, 2014 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: 504449/2013 Judge: David I. Schmidt Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [* FILED:1] KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/25/2014 03:42 PM INDEX NO. 504449/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 75 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 :1 At an lAS Term, Part Comm 2 ofthe Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Courthouse, at 360 Adams Street , Brooklyn, New York, on the 9th day of July, 2014. PRE SENT: HON. DAVID I. SCHMIDT, Justice. ----------- ----- - --- -- -- --- --------x VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE C,OMPANY FOR ITSELF AND AS SUBROGEE OF GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC., Plaintiff, . - against- Index No. 504449/13 ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. ------------- --- --- --::-- --- ----- --- -x ,I The following papers numbered 1 to 10 read on the motions.herein: Papers Numbered Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause/ Petition/Cross Motion and Affidavits (Affirmations) Ann,exed ~ _ 1-2,3-4 Opposing Affidavits (Affirmations ) _ 5 Reply Affidavits (Affirmations) _ 6,7,8,9,10 _____ Affidavit (Affif111ation) _ Other Papers _ Upon the foregoing papers, plaintiff Valley Forge Insurance Company (VFI) moves ., I I~ for summary judgment declaring that defendant Allstate Indemnity Company (Allstate) is an insurer for Granite Construction Inc. -
TRANSIT REPORT: the Ordeal of Southern Brooklyn Commuters
NEW YORK STATE SENATOR ANDREW GOUNARDES DECEMBER 2019 TRANSIT REPORT: The Ordeal of Southern Brooklyn Commuters 8018 5th Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11209 | (718) 238-6044 | gounardes.nysenate.gov Content Introduction 3 Survey Results 4 Analysis 8 Next Steps 12 Appendix 14 Dear Neighbor - It’s no secret that the MTA is broken and that southern Brooklyn desperately needs new transit options. As a regular transit rider, I know firsthand the frustrations and delays that have resulted from our dysfunctional transit system. Great public transit can transform the very character of a city. Poor public transit can harm economic prospects, quality of life and more. This transit report is a compilation of the results of our transit survey, which represents more than seven months of seeking to reach commuters at every subway station and commuter bus stop in the district. We wanted to ask a simple question: How’s your commute? We knew that the answers wouldn’t be pretty, and that’s borne out in the survey results below. You’ll see the very real impact that the terrible commute has on peoples’ lives here in southern Brooklyn as well as some ideas for making our system better. The results of this survey confirm for me how important it is for elected officials to champion more reliable, frequent service for our buses and subways, as well as accountability and station accessibility. I have introduced legislation to codify accessibility goals and another bill to give riders a vote on the MTA board so they can have a say in how their transit dollars get spent. -
Show Them the Money! Seniors Still Stuck at Slope Old Folks’ Home Despite Pledged Payment
Aug. 12–18, 2016 Including Brooklyn Courier, Carroll Gardens-Cobble Hill Courier, Brooklyn Heights Courier, & Williamsburg Courier FREE ALSO SERVING PROSPECT HEIGHTS, WINDSOR TERRACE, KENSINGTON, AND GOWANUS BLAZ SWEATS AT Y Police protest mayor at morning workout — say they’ll be back BY COLIN MIXSON of the city’s 36,000 offi cers. “We like to Police want to help Mayor DeBlasio surprise him.” sweat every time he visits his Park DeBlasio relocated from the Slope Slope gym. to Gracie Mansion when he took of- Dozens of offi cers picketed Hiz- fi ce in 2014, but continues to lead a mo- zoner outside the Ninth Street YMCA torcade over to his old gym between early twice last week and again on Fifth and Sixth avenues most morn- Tuesday to demand a pay raise — and ings so he can engage in a leisurely they’ll be back soon when he least “workout,” often followed by a visit to expects it, according to their union a nearby patisserie — making him a spokesman. sitting duck for foes and journalists “It’s going to be a pop-up thing un- hoping to catch his attention. expectedly,” said Joseph Mancini of During their early morning rallies, the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Associa- the protesting patrolmen waved signs BLAZ AND BLUE: Protesting police offi cers follow Mayor DeBlasio to the Park Slope Y on tion, which represents around 24,000 Continued on page 11 Aug. 2. Photo by Paul Martinka Show them the money! Seniors still stuck at Slope old folks’ home despite pledged payment BY COLIN MIXSON They’re not buying it. -
Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received
Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received from the Legislature and the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 February 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of Legislative and Community Input Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 February 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 Senate, Legislator's Name of Date Request/Concern/ Close Out Agency/Tracking Assembly or Name (none Legislator's or Agency Response Received Recommendation Expressed Date PCAC if PCAC) PCAC Contact Complaints received about NYCT personnel at the Fresh Pond Nolan, Parking is very limited in the depot and elsewhere but they will try to have personnel park NYCT7503 Assembly Diane Ballek 10/4/10 Depot parking their private vehicles on the streets adjacent to 2/2/2011 Catherine T. in other locations. the Depot. Pheffer, NYCT8061 Assembly Mary Lou 10/6/10 Inquiry about Rockaway park line station projects Information provided. 2/2/2011 Audrey I. LIRR993 Senate LaValle, Ken Abbondola, V. 10/22/10 Late train Provided information 4/4/2011 Site walk-thru conducted with Assembly Member Farrell at Tour conducted on 11/19 and cost estimate developed. Approval letter for use of Capital Farrell, Earnestine Bell NYCT9547 Assembly 11/19/10 155th Street Station BD concerning Assembly funded station Reserve Funds for repairs discussed during 11/19 tour sent to Assemblymember Farrell 3/11/2011 Herman D. Temple improvements on 3/11/11. Approval Pending. NYCT supervisors inspected areas cited in letter. -
Transit and Bus Committee Meeting September 2020 Committee Members H
Transit and Bus Committee Meeting September 2020 Committee Members H. Mihaltses, Chair D. Jones A. Albert L. Lacewell J. Barbas R. Linn N. Brown D. Mack V. Calise R. Mujica L. Cortés-Vázquez J. Samuelsen R. Glucksman L. Schwartz MTA New York City Transit reinstituted front door boarding and fare collection on local buses on August 31st,, ending a short term, stop-gap measure where customers boarded from bus rear doors, put in place to help safeguard employees and customers from health risks. Protective barriers around bus operators were installed on more than 5,800 buses, allowing front door boarding and fare collection to resume safely. The change increases bus capacity by 40 percent for enhanced social distancing. Additionally, the white safety line on the bus floor that riders should stand behind was pushed back to provide more distance between the operator and customers. New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting Wednesday, 9/23/2020 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 1. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 2. SUMMARY OF ACTIONS Summary of Actions - Page 4 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – July 2020 Minutes - Page 5 4. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN Work Plan September 2020 - Page 6 5. PRESIDENT'S REPORT a. Customer Service Report i. Subway Report Subway Report (August Data) - Page 14 Subway Report (July Data) - Page 41 ii. NYCT, MTA Bus Reports Bus Report (August Data) - Page 66 Bus Report (July Data) - Page 82 iii. Paratransit Report Paratransit Report (July Data) - Page 96 Paratransit Report (June Data) - Page 110 iv. -
August 2003 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - AUGUST, 2003 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 46, No. 8 August, 2003 The Bulletin IND EXTENDED TO QUEENS 70 YEARS AGO Published by the New The IND expanded rapidly in 1933, reaching York Division, Electric SUNDAY—EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER Railroaders’ the Bronx on July 1 and Roosevelt Avenue, 10, 1933 Association, Queens a month later. The first test train op- MORNING AFTERNOON EVENING Incorporated, PO Box erated in the new subway on July 31, 1933. 3001, New York, New Three thousand people, who were anxious to Headways York 10008-3001. ride the first E train, congregated in the Roo- 7, 6, 5 5 5, 6 sevelt Avenue station at 12:01 AM August 19, 1933. At about the same time, GG trains Number of Cars For general inquiries, contact us at started running between Queens Plaza and 2 2 2 [email protected]. Nassau Avenue. Like the other IND lines, short trains operated at frequent intervals as Checking the August 20, 1933 GG Sunday Editorial Staff: shown in the following table: schedule, we find that two-car trains were E LOCALS—ROOSEVELT AVENUE TO operating on the same headway as the E Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder CHAMBERS STREET trains. News Editor: WEEKDAYS—EFFECTIVE SEPTEM- The Queens Boulevard Line became very Randy Glucksman BER 7, 1933 busy after service was extended to Union Contributing Editor: Turnpike on December 31, 1936 and to 169th Jeffrey Erlitz MID- AM MIDDAY PM EVE- Street on April 24, 1937. NIGHT RUSH RUSH NING Effective July 1, 1937, morning rush hour E Production trains ran on a peak three-minute headway Manager: Headways for 36 minutes with four intervals on a two- David Ross 12 4 5 4 5, 6 minute headway. -
(Mostly) True Story of Helvetica and the New York City Subway by Paul Shaw November 18, 2008
FROM VOICE ~ TOPICS: branding/identity, history, signage, typography The (Mostly) True Story of Helvetica and the New York City Subway by Paul Shaw November 18, 2008 here is a commonly held belief that Helvetica is the signage typeface of the New York City subway system, a belief reinforced by Helvetica, Gary Hustwit’s popular 2007 documentary T about the typeface. But it is not true—or rather, it is only somewhat true. Helvetica is the official typeface of the MTA today, but it was not the typeface specified by Unimark International when it created a new signage system at the end of the 1960s. Why was Helvetica not chosen originally? What was chosen in its place? Why is Helvetica used now, and when did the changeover occur? To answer those questions this essay explores several important histories: of the New York City subway system, transportation signage in the 1960s, Unimark International and, of course, Helvetica. These four strands are woven together, over nine pages, to tell a story that ultimately transcends the simple issue of Helvetica and the subway. The Labyrinth As any New Yorker—or visitor to the city—knows, the subway system is a labyrinth. This is because it is an amalgamation of three separate systems, two of which incorporated earlier urban railway lines. The current New York subway system was formed in 1940 when the IRT (Interborough Rapid Transit), the BMT (Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit) and the IND (Independent) lines were merged. The IRT lines date to 1904; the BMT lines to 1908 (when it was the BRT, or Brooklyn Rapid Transit); and the IND to 1932.