DOCSLIB.ORG

Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received from the Legislature and the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 February 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of Legislative and Community Input Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 February 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 Senate, Legislator's Name of Date Request/Concern/ Close Out Agency/Tracking Assembly or Name (none Legislator's or Agency Response Received Recommendation Expressed Date PCAC if PCAC) PCAC Contact Complaints received about NYCT personnel at the Fresh Pond Nolan, Parking is very limited in the depot and elsewhere but they will try to have personnel park NYCT7503 Assembly Diane Ballek 10/4/10 Depot parking their private vehicles on the streets adjacent to 2/2/2011 Catherine T. in other locations. the Depot. Pheffer, NYCT8061 Assembly Mary Lou 10/6/10 Inquiry about Rockaway park line station projects Information provided. 2/2/2011 Audrey I. LIRR993 Senate LaValle, Ken Abbondola, V. 10/22/10 Late train Provided information 4/4/2011 Site walk-thru conducted with Assembly Member Farrell at Tour conducted on 11/19 and cost estimate developed. Approval letter for use of Capital Farrell, Earnestine Bell NYCT9547 Assembly 11/19/10 155th Street Station BD concerning Assembly funded station Reserve Funds for repairs discussed during 11/19 tour sent to Assemblymember Farrell 3/11/2011 Herman D. Temple improvements on 3/11/11. Approval Pending. NYCT supervisors inspected areas cited in letter. Issues that could be addressed by Colton, NYCT11474 Assembly 11/20/10 Condition of N Line stations maintenance forces were addressed. Some repairs will be addressed as part of upcoming 2/28/2011 William capital project on the Sea Beach Line. Golden, Response to complaints about subway service changes implemented as part of 2010 NYCT11475 Senate 11/30/10 Complaints regarding N, R, and service. 4/8/2011 Martin J. Service Reduction Plan. Parker, Kevin Letter explaining process of selecting stations for capital improvements; maintenance NYCT9557 Senate 12/13/10 Condition of Church Ave. B line station 2/23/2011 S. staff to address issues raised. Assemblyman DenDecker requested a listing of all MTA DenDekker, MTAHQ 2859 Assembly 12/21/10 property owned or leased, their locations, purposes and costs Information provided. 3/14/2011 Michael associated. Expressed concerns regarding the re-naming of the Broadway- Explained name-change procedures and addressed specificly the process undertaken NYCT9534 PCAC 12/21/10 2/7/2011 Nassau station with respect to the Broadway-Nassau station Sent letter explaining that the Access-A-Ride customer was suspended from using the NYCT9562 Senate Klein, Jeffrey 12/28/10 An Access-A-Ride customer suspended from service service because of violating the No Show and Late Cancellation Policy by cancelling or 2/4/2011 not showing for pick up over 40% of scheduled trips in two consecutive months. Glick, Suggests that countdown clocks should be visible prior to Explained that NYCT policy is to put countdown clocks in unpaid areas unless not NYCT9558 Assembly 1/6/11 2/23/2011 Deborah payment feasible. Sent letter explaining that the Access-A-Ride customer was suspended from using the Cymbrowitz, Assemblymember Cymbrowitz wrote on behalf of Access-A- NYCT9561 Assembly 1/7/11 service because of violating the No Show and Late Cancellation Policy by cancelling or 2/10/2011 Steven H. Ride applicant denied service not showing for pick up over 40% of scheduled trips in two consecutive months. Request for list of parking lots, who runs them and which are MTAHQ 2860 Senate Ball, Gregory 1/11/11 Information provided. 3/14/2011 owned by MTA. Request for information regarding 301 East 69th Street and the Alternatives suggested are not viable. Provided information on current status of NYCT9418 Senate Krueger, Liz 1/11/11 2/9/2011 Second Avenue Subway project. discussions with the building representatives. Kellner, Request for information regarding 301 East 69th Street and the Explained why alternatives presented were not viable. Provided update on dealings with NYCT9419 Assembly 1/11/11 2/15/2011 Micah Second Avenue Subway project. building representatives. January 31, 2011 Page 2 of 111 Senate, Legislator's Name of Date Request/Concern/ Close Out Agency/Tracking Assembly or Name (none Legislator's or Agency Response Received Recommendation Expressed Date PCAC if PCAC) PCAC Contact Braunstein, Set up meet and greet for MTA Director of Government Affairs with the Assemblyman. MTAHQ 2861 Assembly 1/12/11 2/7/2011 Edward Meeting held. Linares, Set up meet and greet for MTA Director of Government Affairs with the Assemblyman. MTAHQ 2862 Assembly 1/12/11 2/7/2011 Guillermo Meeting held. Rodriguez, Set up meet and greet for MTA Director of Government Affairs with the Assemblyman. MTAHQ 2863 Assembly 1/12/11 3/21/2011 Robert Meeting held. Ranzenhofer, Set up meet and greet for MTA Director of Government Affairs with the Senator. Meeting MTAHQ 2864 Senate 1/12/11 2/7/2011 Michael held. Set up meet and greet for MTA Director of Government Affairs with the Senator. Meeting MTAHQ 2865 Senate Zeldin, Lee 1/12/11 2/7/2011 held. Smith, NYCT9172 Senate Jessica 1/13/11 Constituent complaint about A line delay on 1/12/11 Reported to Senator's office source of delay. 2/2/2011 Malcolm A. Nolan, Viaduct will be cleaned as soon as outside temperature is warm enough to allow for high- NYCT9173 Assembly Diane Ballek 1/14/11 Graffiti on 7 line's Queens Boulevard viaduct 2/2/2011 Catherine T. pressure cleaners to be used on viaduct. Fuschillo, Jr., Request for information about LIRR policy on smoking on LIRR1232 Senate Holley, Sarah 01/19/11 Information provided 1/19/2011 Charles outdoor platforms Sent letter explaining that the Access-A-Ride customer was suspended from using the Montgomery, Former employee was considered for employment, but not re- NYCT9567 Senate 1/24/11 service because of violating the No Show and Late Cancellation Policy by cancelling or 2/21/2011 Velmanette hired not showing for pick up over 40% of scheduled trips in two consecutive months. An applicant reapplied to Access-A-Ride service in hopes of gaining unconditional Cymbrowitz, eligibility; however, the applicant was denied service because after their in-person NYCT9573 Assembly 1/25/11 Access-A-Ride applicant determined ineligible for service 3/8/2011 Steven H. assessment it was found that the applicant's medical condition did not prevent them from using regular public transportation. Lentol, NYCT9520 Assembly Cleary, Amy 1/31/11 Request for senior MetroCard replacement. New card mailed to customer on 2/3/11 2/3/2011 Joseph R. Schimel, LIRR1233 Assembly Portnoy, Sandy 02/01/11 Request for update of Colonial Rd. Improvements Project. Community outreach will be done in late March or early April 2/11/2011 Michelle Fuschillo, Jr., MTAHQ 2866 Senate Ellis, Tim 2/1/11 Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with Senate Transportation Committee. Meeting held. 2/8/2011 Charles Silver, MTAHQ 2867 Assembly Pulver, Sue 2/1/11 Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with Speaker Silver. 2/8/2011 Sheldon Silver, Bauer, Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with Speaker Silver's Aide Dean Fuleihan. Meeting MTAHQ 2868 Assembly 2/1/11 2/8/2011 Sheldon Margaret held. Fuschillo, Jr., MTAHQ 2869 Senate Ellis, Tim 2/1/11 Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with the Senator. Meeting held. 2/8/2011 Charles MTAHQ 2870 Senate Skelos, Dean King, Leslie 2/1/11 Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with the Senator. Meeting held. 2/8/2011 Golden, MTAHQ 2871 Senate Brown, Meg 2/1/11 Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with the Senator. Meeting held. 2/8/2011 Martin Sampson, MTAHQ 2872 Senate Oren, Talia 2/1/11 Set up meeting for MTA Chairman with the Senator. Meeting held. 2/8/2011 John After repeated requests to restore the discontinued X37/X38 service as part of the 2010 Golden, NYCT11546 Senate 2/1/11 Reinstate discontinued X37/X38 Express bus service. Service Reduction Plan, NYCT reviewed the current X27/X28 service and determined that 4/15/2011 Martin J. X37/X38 service would be restored in Summer 2011. January 31, 2011 Page 3 of 111 Senate, Legislator's Name of Date Request/Concern/ Close Out Agency/Tracking Assembly or Name (none Legislator's or Agency Response Received Recommendation Expressed Date PCAC if PCAC) PCAC Contact Cusick, Beginning Summer 2011, X22 express bus service was modified to serve the Outerbridge NYCT11547 Assembly 2/1/11 Requests to serve Outerbridge Park and Ride Facility. 4/15/2011 Michael J. Park and Ride Lot during peak rush hours. Lanza, Beginning Summer 2011, X22 express bus service was modified to serve the Outerbridge NYCT11548 Senate 2/1/11 Requests to serve Outerbridge Park and Ride Facility. 4/15/2011 Andrew J. Park and Ride Lot during peak rush hours. Malliotakis, Beginning Summer 2011, X22 express bus service was modified to serve the Outerbridge NYCT11549 Assembly 2/1/11 Requests to serve Outerbridge Park and Ride Facility. 4/15/2011 Nicole Park and Ride Lot during peak rush hours. Beginning Summer 2011, X22 express bus service was modified to serve the Outerbridge NYCT11550 Senate Savino, Diane 2/1/11 Requests to serve Outerbridge Park and Ride Facility. 4/15/2011 Park and Ride Lot during peak rush hours. Titone, Beginning Summer 2011, X22 express bus service was modified to serve the Outerbridge NYCT11551 Assembly 2/1/11 Requests to serve Outerbridge Park and Ride Facility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Family's Guide to Explore NYC for FREE with Your Cool Culture Pass
    coolculture.org FAMILY2019-2020 GUIDE Your family’s guide to explore NYC for FREE with your Cool Culture Pass. Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org WELCOME TO COOL CULTURE! Whether you are a returning family or brand new to Cool Culture, we welcome you to a new year of family fun, cultural exploration and creativity. As the Executive Director of Cool Culture, I am excited to have your family become a part of ours. Founded in 1999, Cool Culture is a non-profit organization with a mission to amplify the voices of families and strengthen the power of historically marginalized communities through engagement with art and culture, both within cultural institutions and beyond. To that end, we have partnered with your child’s school to give your family FREE admission to almost 90 New York City museums, historic societies, gardens and zoos. As your child’s first teacher and advocate, we hope you find this guide useful in adding to the joy, community, and culture that are part of your family traditions! Candice Anderson Executive Director Cool Culture 2020 Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org HOW TO USE YOUR COOL CULTURE FAMILY PASS You + 4 = FREE Extras Are Extra Up to 5 people, including you, will be The Family Pass covers general admission. granted free admission with a Cool Culture You may need to pay extra fees for special Family Pass to approximately 90 museums, exhibits and activities. Please call the $ $ zoos and historic sites. museum if you’re unsure. $ More than 5 people total? Be prepared to It’s For Families pay additional admission fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting April 2021 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 4/21/2021 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MARCH 17, 2021 CPOC Committee Minutes - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2021 - 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. PRESIDENT’S REPORT President's Report - Page 6 5. CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Progress Report on Signals and Train Control - Page 10 IEC Project Review on Signals and Train Control - Page 14 6. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 31 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE March 17, 2021 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on March 17, 2021, which included the following committees: Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad; New York City Transit; MTA Bridges and Tunnels; ; Finance Capital Program Oversight Committee; Corporate Governance. To see a summary of the CPOC Committee meeting, please refer to the March 17, 2021 Board minutes in the April Board Book available here on the Board materials website: https://new.mta.info/transparency/board‐and‐committee‐meetings/april‐2021 ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 3 of 46 - Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 4/21/2021 2021- 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan I.
    [Show full text]
  • Reopening Closed Subway Entrances Using High Entry/Exit Turnstiles
    REOPENING CLOSED SUBWAY ENTRANCES USING HIGH ENTRY/EXIT TURNSTILES Suggestions from the New York City Transit Riders Council November 2001 New York City Transit Riders Council 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 • www.pcac.org © 2001 NYCTRC Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methodology 2 Findings 3 Closed Fare Control Areas 3 Open Exit-Only Fare Control Areas 6 Open Fare Control Areas with HEETS but No MVMs 8 Summary of Recommendations 10 Appendix: Surveyed Stations 12 List of Tables Table One: Status of Fare Control Areas 3 Table Two: Closed Fare Control Areas 3 Table Three: Open Exit-Only Fare Control Areas 6 Table Four: Open Fare Control Areas With HEETs but No MVMs 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Council would like to thank former PCAC Transportation Planner Joshua Schank for his efforts in the research and writing of this report and Associate Director Mike Doyle for final editorial assistance. ABOUT US The New York City Transit Riders Council is the independent, legislatively mandated representative of NYC Transit riders. Our 15 volunteer members are regular users of the transit system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. The Council is an affiliate of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA. For more information about us, please visit our website at: www.pcac.org. INTRODUCTION New York subway stations tend to be quite large. Although these stations are often named after one cross street, the stations stretch so far that they often take up several blocks and multiple cross streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the G Line
    Review of the G Line ,. July 10, 2013 NYC Transit G Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the G line. Based on NYC Transit’s standard measures of On-Time Performance and Wait Assessment, the G performs well relative to the average subway line. At the same time, the G differs from other NYC Transit subway lines because the route is relatively short and never enters Manhattan, and thus serves primarily as a feeder/distributor with most riders transferring at least once before reaching their destinations. This review identifies a number of opportunities to improve operations on the G line, with recommendations chiefly intended to provide more even train headways and passenger loading, as well as to improve customer communication. Key Findings: While G ridership has grown significantly in recent years, it still remains relatively low compared to the rest of the system, and average passenger loads on the G are within service guidelines during both peak and off-peak hours. Scheduling the G train around the busier and more frequent F train causes uneven headways and passenger loads on the G, most significantly during the afternoon peak period, when G service is scheduled at the minimum guideline frequency of 6 trains per hour (an average 10-minute headway). G riders make twice as many transfers as the average subway rider; this high transfer rate is inconvenient for customers who must wait for multiple trains. Trains shorter than the platform length cause uncertainty about where the G train stops, contributing to uneven passenger loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting November 2020 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 11/18/2020 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 2020 Minutes from October ‘20 - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2020 - 2021 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. C&D CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Update on Signals and Train Control - Page 6 IEC Project Review on Queens Boulevard CBTC - Page 10 IEC Project Review on Culver Line CBTC - Page 15 IEC Project Review on 8th Avenue CBTC - Page 19 IEC Project Review on Bus Radio System - Page 24 5. UPDATE ON OMNY, MTA’s NEW FARE PAYMENT SYSTEM Update on OMNY - Page 28 IEC Project Review on OMNY - Page 36 IEC OMNY Appendix - Page 41 6. UPDATE ON SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Small Business Development Program - Page 44 7. UPDATE M/WBE, DBE, and SDVOB PARTICIPATION on CAPITAL PROJECTS M/WBE, DBE, and SDVOB Participation - Page 74 8. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 75 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE October 28, 2020 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on October 28, 2020, which included the following committees: Joint Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad Committees; New York City Transit and MTA Bus Committee; Bridges and Tunnels Committee; Finance Committee; Audit Committee; Safety Committee; Capital Program Oversight Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility and Analysis of Fexpress Service in Brooklyn May 2016
    Feasibility and Analysis of F Express Service in Brooklyn May 2016 MN F Brooklyn F Express Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 6 II. Population and Ridership 8 Recent Trends in Ridership 12 Projected Future Growth in Corridor 16 III. History of Brooklyn F Express 18 Comparisons to Other Express Corridors 20 IV. Current Express Option 21 Limits on Total F Service 26 Limits on Span of F Express 27 V. Express Ridership and Travel Time Savings 27 Potential Shift from Other Corridors 33 Loading Impacts 33 Station Impacts 35 VI. Recommendations 36 MN 1 F Brooklyn F Express Study List of Figures Figure 1 – Culver Line Track Configuration 7 Figure 2 – Population Density, F Corridor 9 Figure 3 – Labor Force as % of Population, F Corridor 10 Figure 4 – F Line Station Weekday Entries and Growth by Segment, 1998-2014 13 Figure 5 – F Line Peak Hour Load Trend 14 Figure 6 – Projected Population Growth, 2015-2035 17 Figure 7 – History of F Train Service Patterns 19 Figure 8 – Proposed F Express Pattern 22 Figure 9 – Current Conditions at Bergen St Lower Level 25 Figure 10 – AM Travel Time Savings by Entry Station, Church Av to Jay St Express 30 Figure 11 – PM Travel Time Savings by Entry Station, Church Av to Jay St Express 32 List of Tables Table 1 – Northbound AM Peak Hour Ridership Profile 11 Table 2 – 2014 Average F Peak Hour Passenger Volume and Percent of Guideline Capacity 12 Table 3 – Culver Line Change in Weekday Entries by Hour, 2007-2014 15 Table 4 – Comparison of Selected Express/Local Corridors 21 Table 5 – Test Train Travel Times (Minutes) 25 Table 6 – Travel Time Impacts Between Selected Station Pairs, AM Peak* 28 Table 7 – Impacts to Riders by Magnitude of Travel Time Impact, Jay St to Church Av Express, AM Peak Hour 29 Table 8 – Impacts to Riders by Magnitude of Travel Time Impact, Jay St to Church Av Express, PM Peak Hour 31 Table 9 – Current and Projected Northbound Departing Loads by Station, AM Peak Hour 34 MN 2 F Brooklyn F Express Study Executive Summary NYCT has prepared this study of F express service on the Culver line in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • How We Got to Coney Island
    How We Got to Coney Island .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS How We Got to Coney Island THE DEVELOPMENT OF MASS TRANSPORTATION IN BROOKLYN AND KINGS COUNTY BRIAN J. CUDAHY Fordham University Press New York 2002 .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS Copyright ᭧ 2002 by Fordham University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means— electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cudahy, Brian J. How we got to Coney Island : the development of mass transportation in Brooklyn and Kings County / Brian J. Cudahy. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8232-2208-X (cloth)—ISBN 0-8232-2209-8 (pbk.) 1. Local transit—New York Metropolitan Area—History. 2. Transportation—New York Metropolitan Area—History. 3. Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)—History. I. Title. HE4491.N65 C8 2002 388.4Ј09747Ј23—dc21 2002009084 Printed in the United States of America 02 03 04 05 06 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS CONTENTS Foreword vii Preface xiii 1. A Primer on Coney Island and Brooklyn 1 2. Street Railways (1854–1890) 24 3. Iron Piers and Iron Steamboats (1845–1918) 49 4. Excursion Railways (1864–1890) 67 5. Elevated Railways (1880–1890) 104 6.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2010 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - APRIL, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 53, No. 4 April, 2010 The Bulletin NYC TRANSIT’S HUGE BUDGET DEFICIT Published by the New We checked the Internet and we found that On weekends, service would be re- York Division, Electric NYC Transit is having difficulty balancing the duced on other lines because of con- Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box budget. struction work. At the present time, 3001, New York, New In December, 2009, MTA-wide revenue pro- trains often operate on a 12-minute York 10008-3001. jections from fares, tolls, government sub- headway. The new schedules would sidy, and dedicated taxes worsened appre- adjust scheduled headways to match ciably. This was caused by a reduction of those required by construction work. For general inquiries, contact us at nydiv@ $143 million in 2009 state subsidy, lower Service would be reduced from an 8– erausa.org or by phone revenue from dedicated state taxes, and a to a 10-minute headway on D, F, G, at (212) 986-4482 (voice cumulative 11.3 percent three-year wage in- J, M, N, Q, and R on Saturdays mail available). The crease to certain union-represented employ- and , , , , , , , and Division’s website is A D E F G N Q R www.erausa.org/ ees. Therefore, the budget deficit was ex- on Sundays. Headways on 1 would nydiv.html. pected to be $383 million in 2009-10 and be reduced from 6 to 8 minutes on Sat- $297 million in 2011. (This number has since urdays and Sundays.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Contract Solicitations
    Eye On The Future - Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Contract Solicitations Reference Number Agency Agency Description S47009/S32398/S32399 NYCT New York City Transit SF02-8129 NYCT New York City Transit C34846 NYCT New York City Transit A36949 NYCT New York City Transit P36339 NYCT New York City Transit R34253 NYCT New York City Transit BW-63/TN-63 B&T Bridges and Tunnels P36483 NYCT New York City Transit A37119 / A38100 NYCT New York City Transit E34026 NYCT New York City Transit A46029 NYCT New York City Transit A37208 NYCT New York City Transit Page 1 of 285 09/26/2021 Eye On The Future - Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Contract Solicitations Type of Contract Duration of Contract Construction 59 Purchase Construction 10 Construction 10 Construction 25 Purchase 30 Constr 18 Construction 24 Construction 18 Construction 30 Construction 20 Construction 11 Page 2 of 285 09/26/2021 Eye On The Future - Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Contract Solicitations Contract Description Communication Based Train Control (CBTC): Two Interlockings and Signal Overlay / Culver Line** Purchase 45 Standard Electric Buses** DCE Shop Components - Phase 3 / Jerome Aqueduct-North Conduit Av / RKY Repl Control & Battery Cable: 4 Substn Cntrl Zones (2/3/5/8) Purchase of 12 3-Ton Crane Cars Construction: Open Road Tolling Initiative - Paving and Landscaping Reconstruction of CBH # 392 - Flushing River Bridge Intermodal and ADA: Canarsie-Rockaway Pkwy / Canarsie Replace 11 Hydraulic Elevators / Various** Station Renewal: 69 Street / Flushing Subway Stairs: 34 St-Herald Sq / Bdwy (S8) [SBMP] Page 3 of 285 09/26/2021 Eye On The Future - Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Contract Solicitations Project Description Solicitation Month To implement Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) Signal System Rehabilitation from JUN Church Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Southern Brooklyn Transportation Investment Study Kings County, New York P.I.N. X804.00; D007406 Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Conditions DRAFT June 2003 Submitted to: New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Submitted by: Parsons Brinckerhoff In association with: Cambridge Systematics, Inc. SIMCO Engineering, P.C. Urbitran Associates, Inc. Zetlin Strategic Communications TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... ES-1 A. TRANSIT SYSTEM USAGE AND OPERATION.................................................................. ES-1 B. GOODS MOVEMENT...................................................................................................... ES-2 C. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ..................................................................................... ES-4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................... ES-5 E. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY.............................................................................................. ES-5 F. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION.................................................................... ES-6 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................I-1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................I-1 B. PROJECT OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................I-1
    [Show full text]
  • C040171ZMK -- Downtown Brooklyn Development; Amendment to the Zoning Map Sections 12D And
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION May 10, 2004/Calendar No. 5 C 040171 ZMK IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by the Department of City Planning pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for an amendment of the Zoning Map, Section Nos. 12d and 16c: 1. eliminating from an existing R6 District a C1-3 District bounded by a line 200 feet northerly of Myrtle Avenue, Prince Street, Myrtle Avenue, a line 100 feet easterly of Prince Street, Fair Street, Fleet Place, a line 85 feet southerly of Fair Street, Prince Street, the westerly centerline prolongation of Fair Street, Flatbush Avenue Extension, and Gold Street; 2. changing from an R6 District to an R7-1 District property bounded by Myrtle Avenue, Ashland Place, the easterly centerline prolongation of former Fair Street, and Fleet Place; 3. changing from an R6 District to a C6-4 District property bounded by a line 200 feet northerly of Myrtle Avenue, Prince Street, Myrtle Avenue, Fleet Place, Willoughby Street, a line midway between Fleet Street and the former Prince Street and its southerly prolongation, a line 85 feet southerly of the former Fair Street, the former Prince Street and its southerly centerline prolongation, the westerly centerline prolongation of the former Fair Street, and Flatbush Avenue Extension; 4. changing from a C5-4 District to a C6-4.5 District property bounded by Willoughby Street, Jay Street, a line 200 feet northeasterly of Fulton Street, Duffield Street, Fulton Street, Smith Street, Livingston Street, and Boerum Place; 5. changing from a C6-1 District to a C6-2 District property bounded by: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Community Board Budget Requests
    Register of Community Board Budget Requests For The Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2010 Bronx The City of New York Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Office of Management and Budget FY 2010 Executive Budget Register of Community Board Budget Priorities The Register of Community Board Budget Requests for the service needs by submitting expense budget requests with Executive Budget reports the FY 2010 executive budget status voted priorities. Community boards submitted 1,284 expense of each of the projects and programs requested by the City’s 59 requests. community boards. Boards also indicate the general importance of current services The FY 2010 Register is the charter mandated product of a by ranking service programs which provide direct local level dynamic and cyclical budget process for the 59 community services. This ranking system informs elected officials and boards. The community boards consult with agencies on the budget decision makers which programs the communities deem capital and expense needs of the district. After consulting, each most important. For FY 2010 the community boards ranked 90 community board develops and votes separate priorities for up program activities provided by 24 selected agencies. to 40 capital and 25 expense budget requests which the agencies review and respond to in the Register of Community For more specific information about programs important to the Board Requests for the Preliminary Budget in January. community boards, refer to each agency’s section in the Message of the Mayor for the Executive Capital and Expense The Mayor’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviews Budgets. these same budget requests and updates the responses for the Executive Budget.
    [Show full text]