故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期(民國九十五年冬季) 1
႕͛ᑫ९ᄃາΫ*
ለϲᇇ ݣҢ̂ጯ րځᄬ֏ᄃֲ͛ڌ
೩āāࢋ
ѣᙯॡഇጯఙࡁܕೀѐؕன۞ЩჍĂͅߍܕĶາΫķ˘ෟĂ˜ߏ ઼࡚Ăҭд͟ώٕг͞ྵາ۞ࡁտኢ̚ٺտ˯۞ࢭາّᔌ๕ĄѩЩෟᔵࢵ֍ ኜкࢋ৵Ă۞ڼຍဦ߽၅ഈٺజଳϡĄѩ˘ጯఙࡁտ۞ࢋপّĂ˜дھᇃ̏ ϲ֭ᅳጱ۞ొ̶Ąޙጐგιߏ˘઼࣎̚۞ͳഈĂҭݒߏϤ႕ٙٺߏࢦ͍
д࣎ు႙ԛј۞ጯఙࡁտߛၹ྆ĂΫጯछฟؕಶ઼̚።Ϋͽ̈́༊઼̚ϔ ຍཌྷ˯೩າᛉᗟĄ˘ਠ҃֏ĂາΫͽ߄ጼ႔͕̚ኢćགྷ۞ڼј̚႕ ᆶෛ።ΫְІࠎϫᇾĄֽޘϤາ۞ቑёଣ৶࿅Ν)ּтതϔཌྷ*ć֭ͷϤᙝห֎ ԧࣇ۞።Ϋᄮۢ̚Ąҭߏٺ႔۞៍ᕇĂ֭ԯιፋЪܧᖎ֏̝Ăѩ˘ጯఙኝᗟ೬ϯ ߏۢᙊ˯۞ត̼ĂιТॡ˵Ӕனдᄬ֏˯Ăд͞ࢬࢋᇾᄫд่่ܧາΫ֭ ଳϡ˞႔ᄬͽγ۞ᄬ֏ྶ̝͛ᚥĄϫ݈Ă႕ᄬ͛ᚥߏ̚ࢦ˯ڱࡁտ͞ٺ ࢋ۞Մफ़Ąдώኢ͛̚Ăԧࢋгᖎ႕ᑫ९дາΫ۞൴ण࿅̏̚གྷणன Ϗֽ̪ᜈԷႊ۞֎ҒĄٺͷ
ᙯᔣෟĈ።Ϋྤफ़ă႕͛Ϋफ़ăΫጯΫăᑫ९ă።Ϋă႕።Ϋ
* 本文初稿為「文獻足徵—第二屆清代檔案國際學術研討會」(臺北:國立故宮博物院,2005年11月 3~5日)之主題演講。感謝李仁淵先生在中文譯稿上的協助。 2 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
͛३ᑫ९˘ۡӛ͔̙Тˠࣇ۞۞عѺѐมĂ߆˘ܕҋଂഈඕՁҌ̫ ᄃᘹ͛ࠧˠۏˠڼෞኢ۰ă߆ົۤזᐡࣶăۏќᖟछă౾ۏĂଂ३થăΟڦᙯ ˭ֽ۞ăজтঔ۞͛ІĂ˵ѣࣇعćࠤҌߏౄ৽ຽ۰Ă၆ֱ݈߆̀ ҋ̎ຏᎸ۞ࣧЯĄ༊ឰౄ৽ຽ۰ຏᎸ۞ࣧЯĂᄃԧࣇᆅჸдಞົᛉ۞ࣧ ЯБ̙ТĄ҃ԧ̙༰р؈Ăӈֹߏԧࣇֱ።Ϋጯ۰ĂΞ˵ߏࠎ˞Тᇹ۞ࣧ ྆ĉٕ۰ᇹᄲĂឰԧࣇᆅჸѩг۞ߏӎಶߏ࠹Т۞ᑫ९ĉЯࠎጐგזЯ ԧࣇ˘ᇹౌ၆ഈѣᎸĂԧࣇலౣᄃֱᑫ९ЧҋѣЧҋ۞ᙯాĄԧ่̙֭ߏ ѩ̙Тęᔵ˵ߏְكᄃҋ̎࠹ᙯ۞ᑫ९Ăֱ҃࠹ᙯ۞ొ̶זᄲԧࣇΪ࠻ ၁Ąԧຐᄲ۞ߏĈԧࣇ่̙ߏֶೈЧҋপؠ۞ྮश֕ˢ͵ࠧЧ፟ၹٙќᖟ۞ ԧࣇڍ͛३ᑫ९̚Ă҃Հࢦࢋ۞ߏĂԧࣇ˫ᐌЧҋপؠ۞ྮश֕˞аֽĄт ഈᑫ९âтЧ۞ᑫ९˘ᇹĂ่̙Ϊߏ͛३၁វ۞ᓁĞٕ۰ֱצତ ͛३ะវ۞х෬̝ğĂ҃Հߏ˘࣎хдԧࣇ͕̚ଣྙ࿅Ν۞ٙĂߏ˘࣎ጸ ၹҋ̎˘˟۞ᑫޙពгĂԧࣇЧҋځޝԛͷజࢦາԛ۞г͞Ă֤ᆃ Ă՟ѣЊᑫ९ົߏ࠹Т۞Ąק९Ą˵ຍ
ֽ˵ధΟَĂ҃ԧᄮࠎĂଂԧࣇՏ࣎ˠౌߏͽЧҋ۞͞ёдڱᇹ۞ᄲ ።Ϋ͛३֤זৌ၁ّߏΞͽቁؠ۞Ąଂវᄮ۞ڱ३ᆷ።Ϋ۞ᕇֽᄲĂ࣎ᄲ ̿Ą֤ڵ˧ˠ̙щ۞ăТॡߏ˫ߏ၌۞ᗕࢦّኳ༊̚â౹ౄّ۞ૺ΄ ߏଂૺ˧༊ܮᗔᓏă֤ҲӤă֤ૺ˧ώ֗͞ߏৌ၁۞ᑫ९Ă҃ԧࣇ۞።Ϋ ࠎҋ̎൴ᓏĄڱኚϠĄтТ̂छ҅ሢਕྎ۞Ă።Ϋ͛३ώ֗ߏజજ۞Ă̚
ϲĶᑫ९ѣкᇹّޙԧ̝ٙͽଂ྆ฟؕԧ۞ኢᕇĂߏЯࠎԧᄮࠎ гЇϤԧࣇٽണᐩĂΞͽᅅـࢦࢋĄᑫ९̙֭ߏϠ۞࿅ޝهᄃϠ˧ķ۞ໄ ౷ă̶ᙷᄃೢᏴĄᑫ९ߏ߿۞Ăιᄃॡ҃ዏă՟ѣࠧቢͷត̼кბĄ༊ԧࣇዦ̷ ώѨົᛉ۞ኢ͛Ăٕ۰ࢼᒟፋ࣎˼ត༱̼˫·႕ࡎ۞ΫጯኢॡĂ˯ᕇᜓ Ăౌͽഈ۞ᑫ९͛३ઇ̶ొ˘̂ޝன۞ՀࠎពĄֱ҃үБొĂٕ۰ᄲܑ ̚ăٕ۰ᄲԧࣇڦࠎૄᖂĄԧ̝ٙͽૻአᑫ९۞Ϡ˧ᄃкᇹّĂֱԧࣇԸ ޢߏາ۞።Ϋᆷү̙ᕝՀϠ۞ࡦܮώ֗ӈࠎ̚˘ొЊ۞পኳĂߏЯࠎֱপኳ Я৵Ąٕ۰ѣˠົซ˘ՎؼҩѩኢᕇĂᄮࠎՏ࣎າ።Ϋ۞னౌᅮࢋາ۞ᑫ९Ą дቔኢ͛̚Ăԧٕధົͅ࿅ֽᄲĂૺՏ࣎າᑫ९ౌᅮࢋ˘࣎າ።ΫĄ҃д ϲдഈ۞႕͛ᑫ९̝˯Ąޙቔ͛ౢ̚ԧٙᄲ۞າᑫ९Ăӈ
ᇹᄻĂι۞൴ण۞זдώ͛̚Ăԧೡᘱ࣎າᑫ९۞ᇹᄻĂٕ۰ߏԧٙ࠻ 滿文檔案與新清史 3
ᆃгՎĄԧࠎ̂छаᜪଂֱາᑫ९̚ᔞϠ۞າ።̦ז࿅Ăͽ̈́னд൴ण ΫĂ҃дඕኢĂԧχზᖎൺ۞ኢѩາ።ΫಶԧࣇநྋΫٕ˘ਠ҃֏۞̚ ΫֽᄲĂٙѣ۞ࢦࢋຍஉĄ઼
˘ă႕͛ᑫ९
үഇมܲх˭ֽ۞ᑫ९༊̚ĂࡗѣѺྻعࡔ߆͵˩˟ז˛˩д˯˼༱І ༱ІĂӈࡗѺ̶̝˟˩۞ּͧĂБొٕొ̶ͽ႕͛३ᆷĄ̚Βӣ˞ЧёЧᇹ۞ Ϋफ़ĂтݶၦăᏞўăࡔᐂă༫ᅛăΫቇăˠְᐂăϫඈඈĄೀͼՏ࣎߆ ͛३ೀͼ۞ܝă̙ТॡഇĂѣֱొܝѣ႕̳͛͛३ćᐌ̙Тొౌܝࢋొ۞ع Бొͽ႕͛३ᆷĄ1
ચߏͽ႕͛ந۞ְ͞ء۞̶ొعͽֽிٙ࠰ۢĄ߆˳ܜֱΫफ़۞хд ˠ͌ޝĂ҃ͷޘְ࣎၁༊̙ߏ̦ᆃ৪Ąӈֹ՟ѣˠۢտౣቁ̷۞ֹϡ ᄬ֏̝˘Ăপ͞ءਕᑖĂҭߏ̂छౌۢ႕͛͛३അజֹϡĄ႕͛ߏഈ অ۞႕͛фϓд༊ॡ۞઼̚ᐌΞ֍ĂΒ߁дᅚ૱ֹϡ۞ఱ။˯Ăౌ័ ѣ႕͛фϓĄҌ͌дፋ࣎˩ˣ͵ࡔĂԗͽ႕႔ᄬ֏Ҷࢋ߆३Ăͷ̳ฟ ࣶౌజࢋՐࢋጯ௫႕͛Ăͷሢۢԗྻүءгૻአჯ႕͛ਕ˧۞ࢦࢋّĄ৺ ܝဈొءߏ̙ТܮಏҜདϡ۞ˠĂࣇ۞˘̍үĂعˠౌۢĂధкజ߆۞ ͛३ଂ႕͛ᖙᛌј႔͛Ăٕଂ႔͛ᖙᛌј႕͛Ąࠎ˞႕ֱ֖ˠࣶ۞ᅮ۞ֽـม লሬᇄౌΞז३ĂឰЇңˠڱΞ៍ᇴณ۞ᙜă͘Ίᄃ͛˞ۍથۍՐĂΔִ ዦᜓᏴᔉĄᔵ˩˝͵ࡔ۞઼͛̚ˠᄮࠎ႕͛۞ֹϡు႙ੜĂҭѩ͵ࡔ˭Ηཧ ࣶม۞Ϲঘ఼ĄءᄃഈٺҘ͞ˠĂ̪ᛇᑖ႕͛ѣӄ۞઼̚זֽ
Ăֱᖞͳഈ۞႕͛͛३ฟؕд̝݈̙അன࿅۞ޢඕՁ̝ڼߏ༊ഈٺ г͞னॡĂ՟ѣˠົᛇ؈َĄ࠹ͅ۞Ăֱྤफ़ଂ1910ѐฟ̳ؕฟ߹็Ă 1920ᄃ30ѐĂౌពтѩநٙ༊ĄߏЯࠎĂ౹ౄֱ͛३۞זͷᜈ߹็ ৩Ԕ̙̏ೇхдĂֱ͛३၆઼छ˜ҌЇңˠ̙̏ГѣϡĄপҾߏιࣇͽᙱڼ߆ ε߆Ăߏጱ༊˭઼๕л۞Я۞عͽᏰᙊ۞ள͛фᆷјĂ҃༊࣎ள߆ ĄГۏॡĂᔘѣኡົ၆ֱ͛३ѣᎸĉ̂छҋߏຐᕚ௲ֱϡ۞݈ഈ̝
1 對這些資料更完整的回顧請參見Mark C. Elliott: “The Manchu-Language Archives of the Qing Dynasty and the Origins of the Palace Memorial System,” 1-70. 4 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
ξ۞ූٺߏֱజୢٺϔ઼ॡഇૻ̂۞ϔຍᙊֹˠࣇ̙Гጯ႕͛Ăٺ۰ĂϤ ࠎγ઼ˠٙ෴ΝĄ2 ੵ˞͌ᇴּγĂд࣎ॡഇΪౌޢЊొ˘̂ޝ႕͛ྤफ़ѣ ѣ˘ֱ͟ώᄃለ߷ጯ۰၆ќะᄃࡁտֱ႕͛३ᚱᑫ९ѣ˘ֱᎸĄкᓪࣇĂ ଂдԗ۞ࡠ᎘ົି̀ฟؕ۞႕͛ࡁտ็ͽᚶᜈĄֱ˟˩͵ࡔ̚ཧ̝݈۞ ።Ϋ֭՟۞ޢ႕ˢᙯ̝ٺጯ۰Ăጐგࣇ̝̚ѣధкˠ۞႕͛ౄྔࠤָĂҭ၆ ᜈֹ̪ޢᎸĄЯ҃тТ˞εጸা˘ਠĂ၆႕͛അд˩˛͵ࡔ̚ཧ۞̂ޝѣ ϡ۞ጸΞᄲౌజ٠ΝĄ
Α͈ጯ௫႕͛ᎸĄྫྷѩॡ܅Ϋጯ۰၆۞ܐᇹ۞ᒖဩឰ˟˩͵ࡔ ೀͼ̙хдĄזഈ႔͛͛३ᑫ९ֽͧĂ႕͛ྤफ़Ξͽᄲ͌۞ۍഇ̂ณበᚷ ˞۞႕͛ྤफ़Ă˵఼૱ߏүࠎ႔͛ᑫ९۞ઘώனĂ҃Հጱפໂ͌ᇴΞͽ ࿆۞ј֍Ăӈᄮࠎੵ˞1644ѐ̝݈۞ѝഇΫफ़̝γĂٙѣ۞႕͛ྤफ़ౌТ˘ ώĄ҃Ω˘࿆۞ј֍Հΐૻ˞Ķጯ௫႕͛՟ѣυࢋķۍॡхд࠹၆ᑕ۞႔͛ Ăᐌ̝ᄃ႔ˠТ̼Ă֭ͷಉε˞ᄃ႔ˠ࠹̶ޢĄӈᄮࠎ༊႕߷ˢᙯ̝ڱຐ۞ ˘ёώኳ˯ౌྫྷ႔ˠ͞ڼຐᄃޥĂߊ႕߷ˠ۞ڱҾ۞ડຍᙊĄֶፂ࣎࠻ िᄃ៍ੈ۞זΫछд႔͛ྤफ़̚Ա̙זΞਕԱ̙ܮᇹĂ֤ᆃଂֱ႕͛ྤफ़Ă ͕˧Νጯ௫႕܅Ă֤˫ңυܮᕇĂ҃ߊ႔͛̂छౌᑖĂͷֹϡֽтѩ͞ ၁ĄЯְ۞ځజᄮࠎߏืᙋౌ˵ڱ͛ĉӈֹ၆ᑖ႕͛۞ጯ۰ֽᄲĂֱຐ ѩĂଂЇң˘ࢬֽ࠻Ăд࣎ॡഇĂࡶฟؕຐࢋᒢྋഈăٕᆷֱѣᙯഈ۞ Ăዦ႕͛۞ਕ˧ౌ̙జ༊үߏυ౯۞୧ІĄ3ְ
ฟؕᖼតĄѣ۞ߏĂ࣎ᖼតೀͼТၙၙޘ҃ଂ1970ѐฟؕĂၗ ႕͛дࡁזຍڦॡдᄂ៉ă઼̂̚ౙᄃ͟ώ൴ϠĄдᄂ៉ĂౘଥАᄃఄР൴ࢵА ٙќᖟ۞ഈᑫ९֭ฟؕੰۏ።Ϋ۞ࢦࢋّĄࣇд൴ଧ߇झ౾̝ޢտ႕ˢᙯ ۍٙѣ႕͛ᑫ९ౌѣ႔͛ܧğ۞ॡ࣏Ă൴ன֭ۍĞ఼૱ᄃᇆώ˘ۍ̝ Įझ̚ᑫႧഈݶ۞ۍБϡĄ1977ѐ߇झܧώĂ҃ᑖ႕͛၆Ϋछֽᄲ֭ ͵ᚥĄᔵԲᑫ९̙ߏௐ˘Բય̂ޝѣڱၦįௐˣăௐ˝ᏭĂ၆Լត࣎࠻
2 對這個主題參考:Mark C. Elliott and James Bosson, “Highlights of the Manchu-Mongolian Collection,” 80. 3 「即使是清朝初期,幾乎所有的滿文資料不是由漢文翻譯而來,便是已翻譯成漢文。對研究清朝 中晚期的歷史學者來說,滿文史料或許有用,但非必要。」Joseph F. Fletcher, “Manchu Sources,” 145. 滿文檔案與新清史 5
႕͛ᑫ९ߏ1971ѐѺዶІ۞ޢഈ̝ڼึ۞ۍ႕͛ᑫ९Ğௐ˘Բ۞ޢ̝ڼึ۞ ϒ័۞ۍ߶͛ऱ1972ѐڌѐᘵಜ႕͛ݶၦğĂ4 ҭ̙ߏѐᘵಜݶၦĂ˵̙ߏ۞ ຍĄ่̙ఄР൴ͽ̚ڦ۞ھࡓၮᑫĂ5 ҃ߏ˘Բᑫ९Ăௐ˘Ѩ͔Ϋጯࠧᇃ በįĂ6 ҃ќᐂдĮझ̚ᑫܐѣ۞˘ֱᑫ९ĂᖼԨᖙᛌࠎĮጧႬΫफ़ ІᇆώĂ˵ᇆᜩ˞͟ώΫछܫጧႬ̜ॡ۞႕͛فႧഈݶၦįௐˣă˝Ꮽ̚Ⴇ ĂڍϑįĄ7 ଂዦֱјܫ۞ޓགྷүĮႧ࠱ۍϣࡻσĂឰд1979ѐت ͽ̈́ଂౘଥА۞Į႕͛၁ᐂࡁտįă8Į႕͛ώࡔࡁտį9 ̚Ăጯ۰ࣇฟؕΞͽ ።Ϋ˵࠹༊ѣϡĄ۞ޢĂ႕͛Մफ़၆ࡁտ႕ˢᙯ̝ז۞ᒢྋ
٢๒˞˘̈ཏѐᅅă҃གྷ࿅˵ࡗдТॡĂд઼̂̚ౙ۞Δִௐ˘።Ϋᑫ९ᐡ পҾቚ۞छጯ۰Ă͘ፋந˘Ϋᐡ۞႕͛ќᖟćֱќᖟ̚Ăѣֱొ̶Ξᄲ ˬѺѐֽౌ՟ѣˠତᛈ࿅Ąд1980ѐѝഇĂ༊ௐ˘።Ϋᑫ९ᐡฟؕШጯఙࠧ ࢋᕩΑ̶ొ̂ޝĂ႕͛ᑫ९۞ࢦࢋّд઼̚˵ు႙జវᄮĄޢొ̶ᐡᖟٸฟ ٺ1981ѐ౹Ώ̝າഇΏĮ።Ϋᑫ९į˯Ώྶ۞႕͛Ϋफ़ᖙᛌĂͽ̈́тฟؕٺ ݡĄдፋ࣎ˣŒѐĂኢдᄂۍ1978ѐ۞Įᑫ९Ϋफ़ᕍበįඈপҾ۞ ႕͛үࠎΫࡁտ̝ጯఙᄬ֏۞ࢦࢋّĂฟؕѣֽٺă઼̂̚ౙٕ͟ώĂᙯ៉ னĄځкᙋ
႕͛Մफ़ࢦࢋّ۞ВТЯ৵Ăזт˯ٙĂᄂ៉ᄃ઼̂̚ౙጯࠧు႙វᄮ ԣгᖼត˞Чгጯ۰ࡁտޝѐֽĶаᕩᑫ९ķ۞ᔌ๕Ă҃࣎ᔌ๕ܕࢋߏЯࠎ Ϋ۞͞ёĄԧ˵ԓ୕ΞͽᄲĂ݈ϤѩĶаᕩᑫ९ķᔌ๕ጱֽ͔۞ăࢦາវᄮ Ăౄј۞ࢦ̂ᖼតĂΞឰధк࣎ᅳા۞ጯϠฟؕጯ௫႕ه႕͛ࢦࢋّ۞າໄ тѩĄੵ˞д͟ώೀ࣎ࢦࢋጯܧ͛ĂͽഇΞͽྻϡдࣇ۞ࡁտ˯Ąְ҃၁֭ ఙ͕̚۞ࡁտϠࢋጯ௫˘ѐͽ˯۞႕̝͛γĂኢдᄂ៉઼ٕ̂̚ౙĂౌϏഅॲ ώгෞҤ࿅ጯ௫႕͛ৼˢ౾̀ቚ˘ొЊ۞υࢋّĄጐგдгౌѣֱѣ ᐍჟৠ۞ˠĞΒ߁Δִ̚δϔጯੰͳᔨᎰ۞˘ֱጯϠğՙؠጯ௫႕͛Ă݂҃
4 國立故宮博物院故宮文獻編輯委員會編,《年羹堯奏摺專輯》三冊。 5 神田信夫等編,《鑲紅旗.雍正朝》。 6 莊吉發譯注,《清代準噶爾史料初編》。 7 岡田英弘,《康熙帝の手紙》。 8 陳捷先,《滿文清實錄研究》。 9 陳捷先,《滿文清本紀研究》。 6 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
Ұࢍ൪ࢋࡁտ˩˛͵ࡔ݈ΗഇνΠ۞ܧវ˯ᄃ̝݈࠹ТĈੵ̂ޘ၆႕͛۞ၗ ΫĂҰ̙ϡፉ͕႕͛۞યᗟć҃ጐგѣᄃҰᗟ࠹ᙯ۞ࢦࢋՄफ़ͽ႕͛ᆷјĂҰ ώಶΞͽ˞Ąᖙᛌд႕͛ᑫ९ٙ̚Էႊ۞֎ҒߏΩۍϡፉ͕ĂЯࠎҰϡ႔ᛌ̙˵ ˘࣎ኝᗟĂൾޢԧГаᐝኢĄ
Ąд1970ѐĂ࿆ၙޝԼត۞˵ޘд઼࡚ĂтТд઼̚˘ᇹĂ၆႕͛۞ၗ ˞זߏᄮࠎĂੵ˞ࡁտ࠹༊ѝഇ۞ΫͽγĂ՟ѣυࢋጯ௫႕͛Ą̪҃ڱ࠻۞ ႕͛ࢦࢋّ۞ੈिฟؕࠎጯࠧٙۢĄͽࡁտ፟۞үݡٺഇĂᙯܐ1980ѐ Ąдсۏ઼࡚ጯࠧ۞ࢦࢋˠזჷЩ۞Ϩ૽ළĞBeatrice Bartlettğߏѩੈि็྿ ߏ႔͛ᑫ९۞่ܧซҖ۞ࡁտ࿅̚Ăс൴ன˞႕͛ᑫ९ੰۏ߇झ౾ٺ̶ొ̂ сᄃఄР൴ᜈ۞Ϲೱຍ֍Ąд1985ѐΏ۞˘ቔ͛ౢٺઘώĂ҃ొ̶ࢋᕩΑ ༊̚Ăсۡତౘ࣎ኢᕇĈ 關於清朝滿文檔案廣為接受的認識是:以研究歷史課題來說,清史學者 幾乎沒有必要去學習滿文、或者使用滿文史料。……然而與現今的看法 相反……許多清朝中葉甚至晚期的滿文檔案,從未被翻譯成漢文。未來 的清史學者應該會清楚地發現學習滿文相當值得。10
࣎າੈिᙋ၁˞Joseph FletcherĞᄃϨ૽ළܲᓑᘭğೀѐ݈̖ᄲ۞Ĉ ࢋઇௐ˘߹۞ᑫ९̍үĂυืࢋጯ௫႕͛Ă֭ڍĶଂனдฟؕâ࣎Ϋጯ۰т ͷགྷ૱ͧྵᄃࡁտᗟ࠹ᙯ۞႕႔Ϋफ़Ąķ11
ᑫ९̝ĶዩፁିצϨ૽ළ۞͛ౢ൴ܑ࡚̚ᙯܼ̏ϒ૱̼̝ᅫĂឰࡁտϠତ ֈķ۞Іְ่̙ΪߏΞਕĂ҃ՀߏυࢋͷΞҖĄྤஎጯ۰ࠤҌՀѣ፟ົଂາ ႕͛ᑫ९࠹၆ֽᄲᇴณࠤĂֱᑫ۞ۍฟ൴۞ࡁտݵ፟̚ᒔৈĄЯࠎӈֹ̏ ዦĄҭߏĂтТдᄂ៉ᜓٽ९னдౌΞдᄂ៉ăΔִᄃᕬว۞ೀ࣎ࢋќᖟᅅ ᇹĂд઼࡚ࡁտΫ۞ጯϠ֭՟ѣଷጯ௫႕͛۞ࢲሗĂЯ˘ڶᄃ઼̂̚ౙ۞ଐ Ӏϡќᖟдֱг͞۞႕͛ᑫ९ĄҬͼߏ̂छౌд៍୕Ăຐ࠻࠻ᑖڱѩࣇ˵ ႕͛ߏӎৌΞͽԼតࣇ၆ഈ۞៍ᕇĂឰࣇ۞Ϋࡁտѣ̙ٙТĄ
10 Beatrice S. Bartlett, “Books of Revelations: The Importance of the Manchu Language Archival Record Books for Research on Ch’ing History,” 33. 11 Joseph F. Fletcher, “Review of Walter Simon and Howard G.H. Nelson, Manchu Books in London: A Union Catalogue,” 653. 滿文檔案與新清史 7
ăາΫ۞ទᏭ˟
ଂ൴ன႕͛ᑫ९่̙Ϊߏ႔͛ઘώĂ҃ώ֗ӈၹј˞ࡁտΫ۞ϲՄफ़۞ ព҃ࢦࢋ۞યᗟ͔ҩ˞ֽĈֱᑫ९ᄲ˞̦ᆃĉՀࢦࢋ۞ߏĂιځкޝᕇĂ ࣇᄲ˞̦ᆃ႔͛ᑫ९՟ᄲ۞ְĉࠤٕĂߊ႕͛ߏтѩᄃ႔̙͛ТĂӈֹдܑࢬ д႔͛̚൴ڱ࠹၆ᑕ۞͛І̚Ăιࣇࢋтңᄲ࠹Т۞ְĉѣңᔳ̝ள˯ ԧࣇฟؕዦࣇͽҋ̎۞ᄬ֏३ᆷ۞͛ІăଂҌ̫Քᐵᓏ۞႕߷֤ڍனĉт ҋ࿅Ν۞ֽזॏ॓نࢬ೩યĂԧࣇ၆ഈ۞៍ᕇົтңԼតĉಶтТԧࣇ˘ ٺາᐛதă൴ன࿅Ν۞Ω˘ᓏࢰĂֽ҃࣎ҋ࿅Ν۞າᓏࢰΞͽۡତ၆Чᙯ ߏၹј˞ன̫ٙᏜĶາΫķ۞ૄܮ႕߷ᄃഈ۞າયᗟ೩аᑕĄֱયᗟĂ ᖂĄ҃Ăֱາ۞યᗟߏ̦ᆃĉଂңֽ҃ĉ҃ĶາΫķ۞ຍཌྷ˫дࣹ྆ĉ
˘۞˭ᖎಏ۞ᄲĂԧᄮࠎາΫ۞ࢋপᕇߏĂ̂छౌᄮৌгࢦҤ̂߆ ৩ԔߏᄃĶഈߏ˘઼࣎̚۞ͳഈĂҭТॡϺߏڼࢋ৵Ă҃পҾߏࢦ࣎߆ֱ ķ۞ְ၁࠹ᙯాĄາΫ̙ᙒјഈ่ෛࠎߏ˫˘࣎ڼϲăٙޙϤ႕߷ˠٙ ഈ࠹ϼĂ่ߏдܑࢬ˯ѣ˘ֱԼតĄ҃າΫ۞ځͳഈĂٕ۰ᄮࠎഈᄃ઼̚ ።Ϋү۞˘ֱૄώ̝ק߄ጼ˞઼̚ϔཌྷăͽ̈́ѣϔཌྷຍ̏ڱ࠻ ֱ˘˞ѩ೩ٺâֱкᇴ˟˩͵ࡔன઼̚ΫүٙᏲೈ۞ĄາΫ д઼̚።Ϋ˯۞ຍཌྷĂТॡ˵ᄃ઼̚னϔڼયᗟĂֱયᗟ่̙ኢ˞႕߷ Ă႕˭ڶ઼छ۞ԛј࠹ᙯĄ҃࣎ࢋયᗟߏĈௐ˘Ăдˠᇴтѩං͌۞ଐ ႔ˠܧĉௐ˟Ăഈࠎ႕߷ˠ҃ڼ߷ˠтң၆тѩኑᗔ۞߆វჯᆃ˳۞ ᕇĂ၆઼̚ă઼̚ˠϔͽ઼̈́̚።Ϋୃֽᄲѣ̦ᆃमள̝ĉֱૄώયڼ ᗟౌ̙ߏາ۞ĂࠤҌΞᄲ၆Տ࣎Ϋጯछֽᄲౌ̏ߏགྷયᗟĂҭ၆Ķ႕߷ˠߏ Ąֱϒߏ͔ጱĶາֽז̏ג҂ֱયᗟ۞ॡޥኡķ۞ࢦາវᄮĂϒពϯࢦາ Ϋķ۞ૄώኝᗟĄ
ధѣֱˠົ̙Тຍ˯၆ĶາΫķّኳ۞ೡĂ҃ᄮࠎᇹ۞ؠཌྷ͉࿅˵ ĞԧҬͼдّ̣ٸฟ۞ޘব৫Ąቁ၁Ă࣎࠹၆҃֏ྵາ᎖۞ෟຉ̪ܲߙ ιğĄ҃˯ࢬזݡ˯࠻ۍѐ݈ௐ˘Ѩֹϡ࣎ෟຉĂ҃ˬѐ݈ฟؕдϒё ٙᄲ۞ߏ̫͟ԧຐࢋኢ۞ؠཌྷĄ
1980ѐזຐĂԧຐ࣎ࢋሗ߹Ă۰ౌΞͽ໖ޥາΫ۞ٺᙯ ഽ̷Ąд઼̚ࡁտ۞ᅳ۞ڱĄ˘ֽҋధкѐᅅጯ۰၆Լតࡁտ઼̝̚ૄώ͞ 8 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
ા̚Ăѣֱጯ۰˘͞ࢬᛇ็႔ጯछ͉࿅Քдᄬ֏͛ф۞҂ፂ̝̚Ăҭ ႕Ąѣ̙זĶડાࡁտķሀёጯ۰۞ĶҘ͕̚͞ķઐ֍ຏٺΩ͞ࢬ˫၆кΗ 1984ѐٙ೩۞ԲෞĄ೩࣍˘࣎Ķͽ઼̚ٺЩ۞ּ̄ߏߟܲщĞPaul Cohenğ ˟ࠎ͕̚ķ۞઼̚ΫࡁտĂͽྯ௲઼̚۞ԼតౌෛࠎߏаᑕҘ͞۞៍ᕇĄ12 ௐ னཌྷ၆ྃϒ઼̚Ϋ࣎д።Ϋࡁտޢ۵ሗ߹ߏֽҋ˘ཏѐᅅጯ۰Ăࣇᄮࠎ ˧ѣϡĄּтĂӈֹည౮ࡊᇹ˘࣎ѣᇆᜩޝநኢّ࠹၆҃֏ྵళͻ۞ᅳા̚ ຐछĂ઼̪̚Ϊਕߏ˘࣎ϡֽܑٙѣҘ͞ͽγ̝Οَࠍ؈۞ཱིĂѣ̦ޥ۞ ॲஎའ̚טޙ઼࡚႔ጯޞᆃ۞Я৵ăѣ̦ᆃᇹ۞ຍཌྷĉ13 ˫тĂԧࣇтңֽ࠻ Ķᐖၗ̼͛ཌྷ۞͕ၗķĞstatic culturalist mentalityğĉ14 Ωγ˘ཏጯ۰˵ฟؕ۞ ઼̚ٺኳႷĂߏӎΪѣҘ͞۞઼̚Ϋछ̼͛ઐ֍ˢࡁտ༊̚Ă҃˘ֱஎങ ጯࠧ̚۞ྚᛖቑ̙ᅮࢋజोֽࢦາᑭរĉ࣎ኳႷдࡁտ઼̚็ۤົᙝቡཏ ႔ኜę۞ጯ۰ࣇ༊̚পҾૻধĄ15 ၆ࣇֽᄲĂĶͽ઼̚ܧវęΒ߁ّ̃ᄃ ཌྷ۞ࡁտ͞ڌϲ˘࣎ྯ௲ޙࠎ͕̚ķ۞઼̚Ϋ̏གྷ̙ૉ˞ĄтТለ࡚ጯ۰୬ ႔۰ܧĂĶາΫķ۞ࡁտ˵ವՐྯ௲Ķ̂႔͕̚ཌྷķ۞݀ࢨĂ൴னڱ Ğnon-Han otherğ۞៍ᕇĂ̝֭ፋЪซ၆ፋវ઼छᄃۤົ͟ৈᆧΐ۞ᒢྋ༊ ࡁտ۞઼ޓˢ˘࣎ͧྵّ۞ෛࠧĂ၆̂ٸڼĄѩࡁտТॡ˵ဘྏ႕̚ ϲޙࡁտ֭ཉę̙Ϊߏ઼̚ͳഈĂ҃Հߏ͵ࠧг͞ęͽ۞઼ޓᄃ ĂТॡ˵ΒӣڌܕΒӣֲ߷۞гડᄃ઼่̙ޓ࣎ͧྵΫጯ۞ૄᖂĂͧྵ۞˘ ለ߷Ą
̷࢝˘זຐሗ߹۞ᑝឰາΫጯ۰˘ֱጯ۰˘ᇹĂౌវົޥֱ ᅮࢋĂӈᅮࢋ઼̚ࡁտᄃ၆።Ϋ۞ࡁտăͽ̈́၆Бវˠᙷགྷរ۞ࡁտĂኢ۞ ኢ˯ĂౌՀѣ፟гăՀღгඕЪд˘Ąд˯࣎͵Ăֱሗڱдநኢ˯ᄃ͞ Ăౄјڱ߹̏၆็˯ࠎ઼̚Ϋछăٕ˘ਠ҃֏۞઼̚छೠ೪۞ࡁտᛉᗟᄃ͞ ᇹ۞ត̼ĂՀҾᄲ̙ߏٙѣˠౌྫྷז֍ٺٙѣˠౌሄܧዩજĄ֭҃۞̂ޝ˞
12 Paul Cohen, Discovering History in China. 13 如Haun Saussy的討論:Haun Saussy, Great Walls of Discourse, 146 ff. 14 Judith Farquhar and James Hevia, “Culture and Post-war American Historiography of China,” 486- 525. 15 例如高彥頤(Dorothy Ko)在其書前言中批評婦女史中的五四敘述。見Dorothy Ko, Teachers of the Inner Chambers,以及米華健在其書前言中呼籲一個「以清朝為中心」的清史。James Millward, Beyond the Pass. 滿文檔案與新清史 9
ᐌ࣎ត̼ĄጐგтѩĂԧࣇ࣎ᅳા̏གྷдధк̙Т͞ࢬ˯ౌ̏ᖼត˞Ąາ ćି؟д̙Тᗟ৾৾னĈّ̃Ϋćᗁᒚăઉᄃ֗វćᆇёᄃڍࡁտј۞ ᄃ३ᚱΫćˠ˾ࢍćགྷᑻҖࠎඈĄၙၙ۞Ăጯఙෟຉ̙ᕝត̼ă҃ጯఙኢۍ ޓາᅳા྆Ăԯ઼̚ഇ۞̚ܜՀࠎБࢬĄтѣ˘ొ̶ጯ۰ฟؕд͵ࠧΫ࣎ј ᔌШ̝˭۞யݡĂኳႷઐШҘڼΫৼˢ҂ณĄ͵ࠧΫώ֗ಶߏ˘࣎ጯఙᄃ߆઼ Ϋ۞ۢᙊវրĄ༊Б࡚۞̂ጯϠ࣒ٙ௫۞ૄᖂ።ځăᄮࠎҘ͞ಶܑ͵ࠧ͛͞ Ϋķ҃ߏĶ͵ࠧΫķĂ҃༊Б࡚ౌѣିࣶࢋି࣎ኝځΫኝ̙ߏĶҘ͛͞ តࢦࢋֽĂ҃ߏ݈ٙϏѣ۞ְĄഈߏنΫֲڌॡĂ઼ٕ̚˘ਠٙᄲ۞ ณາ᎖۞ă̂ٺព̙࿅۞г̝͞˘Ă҃ᕩΑځࠧΫᄃ઼̚Ϋ۞Ϲົ༊̚͵ ѣԲҿّ۞ጯఙࡁտĂឰтңӔனഈΫјࠎ˘Њтѩჟ૾ѣăѣ߄ጼّ۞ ̍үĄ
ĄтТ݈ࢬٙᄲ۞Ăѣ۞পۏາΫΞͽߏᄲዩજ̝˭۞ࢦࢋய ཌྷതϔཌྷğΝ઼ޓЇચߏ߄ጼ̂႔͕̚ཌྷ۞ୃăͽ۞ቑёĞт ڍଣ৶࿅ΝĂͽ̈́ଂᙝቡ۞៍ᕇᆶෛ።Ϋ൴णĄٕధΞͽᄲາΫ۞ࣰጯęт ጨijĈĶ̙ᙊᘁ̋ৌࢬϫĂΪቡڒЩྐήIJᗟҘ۞ڌѣ۞ྖęк͌тТᛂ дѩ̋̚Ąķүࠎ˘࣎Ν͕̚۞ࢍ൪Ă̏ခજ˞Հᆵᇃ۞ጯఙኢĂΒ߁ᄮ֗ ຍ۞ᗟՄĄ҃тĶຐည۞ВڦѐֽԧࣇВТٙܕඈඈĂ઼ֱޓТăϔཌྷă ķăĶгቡ၁វķĞgeo-bodiesğᄃ઼ϫ۞ኢඈĂٙѣኳ็۞ځТវķăĶజ൴ צĂౌᄃາΫ۞ᙯᘃ࠹ᙯĄѩγĂາΫ˵ତهႷϔ઼छ̝ҋّኳ۞ໄ ĂᄮТ۞Ķְ၁ķొ̶યᗟهĶཏķĞethnicityğᄃĶள̎ķĞalterityğ۞າໄ Ą࣎நኢ้ШĂឰາΫ၆઼࣎̚Ķ઼छķ҃֏Ăѣሕд۞ᙹᖬّĂଂ̼ ̚ฟୁ˞Ķ̦ᆃߏĺ઼̚ĻĉķăĶјࠎĺ઼̚ˠĻߏ̦ᆃຍޥĉķඈયᗟĄҭ ಶߏᖣ೩ֱયᗟĂາΫЯ҃Ξͽౘᖞ۞႔̼ྋᛖĂՀஎˢ႕߷˵ ࢦࢋયᗟĄ۞̚ڼ
҃ĂາΫ่̙֭ߏ˯ᄮᙊኢ۞ᖼШĂ҃Тॡ˵ߏ˘ᄬ֏ጯ۞ᖼШĄ ຐሗ߹Ăͽ̈́႕͛үࠎ˘ጯఙᄬ֏ޥೱήྖᄲĂߏ˯۞ᖼொጯఙᔌШ۞۵ ࢦາ൴னĂВТጱ͔າΫ۞ࡁտĄԧຐкᇴˠౌົТຍĂາΫࡁտд͞۞ ኢ˯۞ࢋপҒߏֹϡ႔ᄬ̝γ۞ᄬ֏ᆷј۞ྤफ़Ă่̙ߏΒ߁႕ᄬĂ˵Βӣڱ ᄬٕࡻᄬĄ҃ڱᄋᄬăᖟᄬăჯӍႬᄬăᔹᄬă͟ᄬăᕓᄬĂࠤҌߏܻᄬă˞ ϫ݈ࠎͤ႕͛Ϋफ़̪ࠎࢦࢋĂЯѩд྆ԧ۞ෞኢ˵Ϊ੫၆႕͛ొ̶Ąԧٙࢋ 10 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
ۍ೩ֽ۞ѣ࣎ࢬШĄ˘ߏ႕͛ᑫ९âткᇴ۞ࣧؕՄफ़Ăົ೬ᜨགྷ࿅ γ۞Җ̝ט࿅۞Մफ़ٙ̚ପᄏ۞ొ̶Ăӈֱ֤ᄃ઼छϲಞ၆ϲăٕ۰д઼छវ ̝ۍ̏ٺજ۰۞ᓏࢰĂٕ۰Ҍ͌ߏᄃ઼छ̝มᙯܼᑩߎሀቘ۞ˠ۞ᓏࢰĄ࠹ྵ फ़ઐШШّĞprescriptiveğĂଂ઼छְચ۞၁ᅫેҖ̚யϠ۞͛३ᑫ९ྤ͞ء ՟ѣᔳᎍĂ҃҃ځ఼૱ߏೡّĞdescriptiveğ۞Ą̙֭ຍᏜ͛३ᑫ९ ۞ܑࢬ̝˭ྵࣧؕϏ࣒۞Մफ़Ă҃ЯѩΞͽୃ͞ءҌ͌ߏֱᑫ९ᜨՀк ឰԧࣇ೩Հᆵᇃ۞યᗟĄ
ᓁߏĂୁϯ႔͛Մफ़ٙ̚ᔳᖟ۞ְܧΩ˘࣎ࢬШߏĂ႕͛ᑫ९఼૱Ăᔵ֭ ព۞ְ၁Ĉιߏͽ႕͛ᆷјĄܑځ႕͛ᑫ९ࢦࢋă˵ߏזଐĄឰԧࣇа ᑫ९ߏϤ˘̙Т۞фវᆷјĂߏͽ႕͛фϓĞٕקᆃӣຍĉࢵАĂຍ̦ ͽ႔фࠎૄᖂĄфវҋгឰഈᄃ˼ѐܧ۰ࢰ༼Ăֶ̙Т៍ᕇ҃ؠğĂ҃ קᙉրĞΒ߁ᄋΟᄃаࡖğాඕд˘ĄѨĂຍ઼ޓૻ̂۞ֲ߷̰ౙֽ ϲֽĂֹϡ۞ෟຉٕᄬήϏυΞдޙෟຉڼ߆۞઼̚ٺᑫ९̂ొ̶ͽ̙Тֱ ቁ̷۞၆ᑕĂ҃Հ̙ϡᄲߏࡻ͛˞ĄೱήྖᄲĂߏ˘ܑனҋ̎ז͛̚Ա̚ পགྷរᄃপຏّ۞ᄬ֏Ą̙֭ߏᄲ႕͛ͧ႔͛ߏՀр۞ᄬ֏Ăٕ۰ᄲߏ Ăд̙۞זՀᆊࣃ̚ϲ۞ᄬ֏Ą҃ιಶߏ˘̙˘ᇹ۞ᄬ֏ĄтТԧൾѝ೩ ۡ˘ࢰሄ۞זтТԧࣇ̝݈ٙܮΞͽᄃ႕ᄬአĂڍТ̝̚ѣஎᅈ۞ຍཌྷĄт ௐ˟࣎ᓏࢰĂ҃ଂ˟ࢦભ̚ΞͽயϠາ۞זߏݶĂ҃ԧࣇனдฟؕ ߏ൴ன˞˘າ۞ࢰሄĄ҃ኢߏ̦ᆃࣧٺă̙Ꮨࢰᄃ̷̶ࢰćಶඈ ࢋֹϡڍЯĂд࣎ࢬШ̚Հஎˢ۞˘ᕇߏĂЯࠎֱᑫ९ߏͽ႕͛ᆷј۞Ăт ιĂԧࣇಶጯ௫ͽ႕͛ΝιĄ
ᕇĄࠎ̦ᆃĉࢵАĂߏ˘۞צᕇĂᄲֽ؈َĂٕధߏᙱΝତ˘ޢ ࢋՐˠࣇΝઇ˘ְֱଐĂΝጯ௫ࣇٙᔘϏ౯۞ԫਕĄтТĮఄ̄įٙ̚ᄲ۞ ၁ᕩķĂυืࢋҋ̎̄̚۞ͪࣆ˘ֱֽĂ̖Ξਕ྅າ۞ซΝĄְ҃ـĶ ᓁߏтѩᖎಏĄጯ௫႕̙͛ΪߏՀк३ăӛќՀкநኢٕᑭዦՀкྤܧଐ֭ ă൴णາфຉĂ֭ͷ၆˘າ۞͛фૈዳຏᛇֽĄጯ௫႕ڱफ़ć҃ߏ௫າ͛ ጯ௫ז̙֭͛ߏপҾӧᙱĂ̙҃тᄲߏࢋѣॡมĄॡม˵ߏ࣎Я৵Ă༊ԧࣇវᄮ ιğΝ၁ᅫዦ႕͛ྤޞ႕ܑ͛ԧࣇѣ፟ົĞٕ۰ᄲѣཌྷચęБ࠻Ұިᆃ࠻ ͛ၙĂԧࣇົ൴னԧࣇͧ̚ޘॡมĄ̙Ϊߏԧࣇዦ႕͛۞ి˯܅ົ˵फ़Ă ҘĄӈֹΪߏԧࣇሢڌ҂̏གྷۢ۞ޥĂࢦາޟкॡมдή̄มᝠᛓଃޝ܅ົ 滿文檔案與新清史 11
זᖙᛌјΩ˘͛фĂ༊ԧࣇዦ႕͛۞ॡ࣏ĂಶтТԧࣇௐ˘Ѩۏଉ۞ְ ιĄԧࣇ۞ᄮۢԼតĂͷតՀࠎஎˢĄֱ༊ޞҘĂͽ̙Т۞ீЍ࠻ڌֱ ߏԧࣇጯ௫ዦ႕͛۞ࢦᕇٙдĄ
࠻Ă˵ߏࠎ̦ᆃΪϡ႕͛ᑫ९۞͛̚ᖙᛌົ̙ࢋᅳĄֽޘଂາΫ۞֎ ֱᖙᛌҋҰҋ̎Ą̙ܧϡ႕͛ᑫ९Ăੵֹٺϡᖙᛌ࿅۞႕͛ᑫ९̙֭ඈֹ ΪߏЯࠎᖙᛌΞਕĂՀߏЯࠎ՟ѣ˘ᖙᛌΞͽ็྿ҋ̎Ꮠ֗ዦᑫ९ٙ Ҙ͞۞઼̚ΫጯछĂΪֹϡᖙᛌјҘ͞ᄬ֏۞ྤڍຏᛇĄᓝּ҃֏Ăт֤۞ז ᙱ̙၆ޝफ़Ă̙҃ۡତዦ͛̚Ϋफ़Ăѣኡົԯ༊˘аְĉ˵ЯࠎᇹĂԧࣇ ˞͛ᖙᛌ۞႕͛Ϋफ़ѣϬ࠼ኑᗔ۞ຏᛇĄᖙᛌ۞ᔌ๕ͅߍ̚ۍૻአۡ˘ ֱᑫ९ٙΒӣ۞ૄώྤפкˠΞͽޝΞநྋ۞ຐ֕ଥश۞ഇ୕Ă҃Тॡ˵ឰ Ąֱ҃Մफ़ߏᖙᛌ࿅˞۞ְ၁Ă̏གྷឰࣇεΝ˞ԧࣇٙᄮࠎࢦࢋ۞ొੈ ࢪϠ࣫ࡎ̝ຏĂ͞۞̚ۏሢଉְٺĂ˵ಶߏࣇ۞পளຏĄ҃ಶߏхд̶ ֱᖙᛌᄃ႕͛ࣧІ۞ᇆώٕԨώ˘ڍĄт۞ځߏາΫࡁտٙࢋ൴ଧᄃᙋ ᇹઇĄѣॡ࣏ԧົᛇĂֱᖙᛌ۞͌ޝĂ҃̂छצĂᔘͧྵΞͽତۍ ѣˠᄮࠎᑫ९̙࿅ߏڍϫ۞ߏĂឰٙѣྍጯ႕͛۞ˠᛇጯ௫႕͛՟ѣυࢋĄт ၁Ϡ۞᎕۞ྖĂ֤ᆃᖙᛌ၆ࣇ҃֏՟̦ᆃ̙၆Ą҃ͽԧҋְֱֽ̎˘ Ĉ႕͛͛३۞ᖙᛌĂֶࣇᖙᛌј႔͛۞ڍޢ۞וᏝޝᄲĂԧԡ̙ҝົຐည˘ ΞُĄޝᇴณ҃ؠâՎՎၨ໑˞႕͛ᑫ९۞Ϡ˧Ą҃၁д
ԧࣇԓڍ႕͛ᑫ९ѣϏֽ۞ྖĂᑕྍߏາΫࢋࠎፉܲĄТᇹгĂтڍт ୕ࢋ౹ౄ˘࣎Ԇፋ۞Ϋဦည۞ྖĂ႕͛ᑫ९Ϻ̙ΞٕĄኢтңĂᑕྍซҖ ೩າ᎖҃ࢦࢋ۞યᗟĂ͔ጱࣧ౹҃ӛ͔ˠ۞።ΫĂͽٺ˧Վ༊ߏâ˭۞ প۞ќז۞ΫछĂາΫѣќᘥĂ҃ዦ႕͛ᑫ९ՀΞ˘˭ڇѩᄲ ᘥĄ
ăΫࡁտ۞າෛˬ
ѣ࣎ૄώ۞८͕યᗟĈௐ˘Ă႕߷ˠтז၆ԧࣇᒢྋഈֽᄲĂ̝݈ԧ೩ ၁၆ன઼̚ѣңְ۞ڼᇹ۞јಶĉௐ˟Ăഈளזңͽ֤ᆃ͌۞ˠ˾྿ ᇆᜩĉኢѣ՟ѣຍᙊᇹઇĂາΫࡁտдೀѐֽ̏གྷणன˞˘າ៍ᕇĂ ˘ӈഈଂ৷ოࠎ˘࣎ॡึԔ۞ॡ߱ЩჍĂᖼតј˘ೡّ۞ෟຉĂܑ 12 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
Ąனдԧࢋᖎಏгໄ࣎៍ᕇĂጐგڼڼሀёă߆ڼࢲॾă߆ڼপঅ۞߆ ڱι̙ߏΪѣ˘ࢬᄻĂԧྏᕩৼ̂۞পᕇĄѩԧଂԧࣇ၆႕߷۞າ࠻ ᄲĂ˵ߏѩາ៍ᕇฟؕ۞г͞Ą
ॡม̚Ăࣇܜ߱ႝ۞઼̚اߏĂд႕߷ˠؠڱᖎಏ۞ᄲĂ̝݈࿆۞࠻ ᄃ႔ˠ̝ม̙Гѣព۞ડזܲгజҫˠ˾кᇴ۞႔ˠٙТ̼Ăۡ҃ి֝ ჟৠ۞ঐεĂͽ̈́ధкၮˠ၆႔ˠ̼͛۞ሤਾĂڠإĄ႕ᄬֹϡ۞ੜă႕߷ Β߁ጯఙăᖃᆇᄃᘹఙඈኜк͞ࢬĂౌజෛࠎߏ႕߷ˠ֕Ш႔̼۞ᙋፂĄ༊ഈ ĂТ̼۞ซҋгԛјĶ႕߷ˠ̏ᄃٙѣ۞ˠღᏉЪд˘ķޢඕՁ̝ ࣒ϒֽܕ۞γֽ۰Ą҃ڇفĂ҃Оᙋ˞˘ήҁྖĈ઼̚ᓁߏΞͽӛৼڍඕ۞ ٚᄮТ̼࣎ᔌ๕Ğԧͧྵ้ШֹϡĶ̼͛ķ˵ڱனΩ˘ဦညĄᔵ࠻ڱ࠻۞ acculturation]˘ෟğĂາΫᄮࠎ႕߷ˠଂϏεΝࣇдۤົ̚ߏ˘࣎পঅ] ᄲĂ႔ˠ˵Ϗഅᄮࠎ႕߷ˠᄃࣇҋ̎ԆБ࠹ֽޘĂ҃ͽ႔ˠ۞֎ڱཏវ۞ຐ ႕߷ཏᄮТ۞ّኳăͽ̈́тңᒢྋᄮТ̝ॡតዏඈٺТĄᔵጯ۰ࣇ၆ ຍ֍ϏυБ࠹ТĂҭ̂छ۞ВᙊߏĂͽߙֱ͞ёĂડ̶႕႔̝ม۞ࠧቢдፋ࣎ д͞ࢬѣӛ͔˧۞நϤڱĂؕౌхдĄ16 ႕႔̶অ۞࠻ޢഈࠤҌ̝ ˞ߏĂιΞͽྋᛖңͽͅ႕֏ኢд˩˝ᄃ˟˩͵ࡔౌᔘਕтѩѣ˧Ă֭ͷ˵ྋᛖ ңͽ႕Ҍ̫̪జᕩࠎ͌ᇴϔĄ
˛˩Ѻ઼̱̚ڼ።Ϋ۞࣒ϒ៍ᕇ߄ጼ˞႕߷ˠ̝ٙͽޢ࣎၆႕ˢᙯ Ą17 ྫྷ࣎ኢᕇ̙ТĂԧૺ႕߷ˠڱѐĂߏЯࠎࣇॲώ˯តј˞઼̚ˠ۞ᄲ ٙͽΞͽјΑ߆ĂߏЯࠎࣇ՟ѣតј઼̚ˠĄߏĂ႕߷ˠϒቁ۞ᄮᙊ̝ ็ڼࣧЯĂࢋЯࠎࣇਕૉ˘͞ࢬྻϡ઼̚߆۞ڼĂࣇΞͽჯ͌ᇴז â͞ࢬ˫Тॡჯপ̝ᄮТĄ18 ᓁវ҃֏Ăᇹ۞ඉரՙؠ˞ࣇ֗ࠎ ߏ̚۞ޘטྎĞˣၮڱᇹ۞πᏊдѩԧࣇז۰۞ᓝନĄтң྿ڼ Ϳ۞ዦҋ̎۞።ΫĂ၆ளޝ႕߷ˠזຍڦࢦࢋొ̶ğĂҭҌ͌ԧࣇᑕྍ ă̮ඈඈĂ˵ౌ̝ۢࠤྎĄܛͳഈ۞።ΫĂтă
16 主要可參考三本著作:Pamela Crossley(柯嬌燕), Orphan Warriors and A Translucent Mirror, 及 本文作者,The Manchu Way. 17 為此觀點辯護最力者見:Ping-ti Ho(何炳棣), “In Defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski’s ‘Reenvisioning the Qing,” 123-55. 18 Mark C. Elliott, The Manchu Way, 3. 滿文檔案與新清史 13
ϻࢭᄃϔ઼ኚϠ۞˘ֱᇃࠎ֙ٺĂТᇹ˵߄ጼ˞ᙯڱֱ၆႕߷ˠ۞າ࠻ ᄃ႔ۏˠڼྋᛖĄּтEdward RhoadsૺĂᔵТᇹણᄃາ߆۞႕߆۞צତ ࢦۏˠڼზࢍ˯ჯ႕߷۞Ӏৈ̪ߏ႕߷߆ڼӀৈࢦᝑĂҭд߆̶ొۏˠڼ߆ ᓝ۞ޘטޓࢋ۞҂ณĄ19 ҃Ăଂࢦາଣ৶႕͛ᑫ९ֽ۞ă၆ഈ઼छᄃ࠱ ኜкࢦࢋયᗟĂ၆Ϋٕᓁវ۞઼̚Ϋ҃֏ĂٕధຍཌྷՀࠎࢦ̂Ąּтдፋ࣎ ܮࣶ̝γĂ႕߷ˠТॡ˵ࢋߏ࣎Ķ႕߷ˠķĂϤѩԧࣇء۰ᄃڼഈĂੵ˞ࢋߏ ഈ۞পᇆᜩĄځٺүĂົѣ̙֍ྻڼᄃ߆ޘטڼ၆ഈ۞߆ڼΞഇ႕߷ ҋధкኢഈ̚ཧ۞үݡĂ҃Ķ႕߷Я৵ķдֱүݡٙԷႊ۞֎ޘᇹ۞֎ ሀё۞ڼͳഈ۞ڇفѣຍᙊ۞ଳϡ̝݈ޓഈ࠱ڍҒֽពĄ20 Г۰Ăт ֱ۞ஶྫĄଂ࣎నזၹ̚Աޙ઼ޓᑕྍΞдഈ۞࠱ᝋᄃܮĂԧࣇྖ ၹ̝࠱ޙഈ۞ј̶Ăځٺၹ̚Ăѣ̙Тޙ൴னдഈ۞࠱ᝋܮ൴Ăາ۞ࡁտ ৩Ԕ۞ЪវĄѩ៍ᕇ၆ధкᛉᗟڼᝋΞᄲߏ͔̬ҋ઼̚ᄃֲ߷̰ౙ̙࣎Т߆ ਠ˘ܧࡁտࠤѣӄৈĂּтԗ̚ព۞ᖟ็Ңିј̶ăഈ۞кᄬன෪ăଂ۞ ચ۞ઐрă၆ҘΔᙝᘟгડ۞ࢦෛᄃགྷᒉĂͽ̈́Чᛉְ͞ءϒёგந ᗟĄ21
аـԧࣇڍଣ৶۞ࢦࢋኝᗟĄтޞଂ࣎͞Ш࠻ĂາΫ̏གྷଯજ˞ధкѣ ă̮ğĂົᖼតԧࣇܛͳഈĞтăڇف࠻Ăፋវّгࡁտᄃͧྵഈᄃ ሀё۞៍ᕇĄՀซ˘Վ۞ᄲĂາΫ۞៍ᕇڼͽֽͳഈ˳ܜΗొڌ၆ለֲ̂ౙ ഈ۞זĂ҃ᇆᜩԧࣇ၆࣫ഈهϺԼតԧࣇ၆Ķ઼̚ķᄃĶ઼̚ˠķ۞ૄώໄ ځĂາ۞៍ᕇ˵ᛈજԧࣇՀซ˘ՎΝଣ৶ྺຽ͛ז።ΫؠҜĄԧࣇ˵Ξຐည ԧڍડા۞ͧྵࡁտĄΩ˘͞ࢬĂтྭזϔมΟҁ۞̢જᙯܼĂ͔҃ᅳێᄃഫ ࣇШ݈࠻ĂາΫ˵ᄃனүాඕĄּтĂາΫጯ۰̏གྷฟؕ೩Ķഈߏ
19 Edward Rhoads, Manchus and Han Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. Pamela Crossley在其著作A Translucent Mirror的結論之處也探究了 清朝滿族認同與民國政治意識型態之間的關連。 20 Beatrice S. Bartlett, Monarchs and Ministers; Philip Kuhn, Soulstealers; James Polachek, The Inner Opium War; Pierre-Henri Durand, Lettrés et pouvoirs; Norman Kutcher, Mourning in Late Imperial China; Jonathan Spence, Treason by the Book. 21 請參見下述著作:Bartlett, Monarchs and Ministers; Evelyn S. Rawski, The Last Emperors; Patricia Berger, Empire of Emptiness; Peter Perdue, China Marches West; James A. Millward et al., eds., New Qing Imperial History; Pamela Crossley, A Translucent Mirror and “The Rulerships of China,” 1468-83.; Michael Chang, “A Court on Horseback: Constructing Manchu Ethno-Dynastic Rule in China, 1751-1784.” 14 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
ă̂ࡻ઼ޓķ۞યᗟĂ22 ࣇ˵ഈ၆ᙝหгડ۞߆ඉᄃܻᘲ઼ޓӎߏതϔ ͽ̈́னѝഇ઼छઇͧྵĂ҃೩ԧࣇߏӎΞͽჍഈࠎ઼ޓăญဦત઼ޓ Ξͽ۞ྖĂ˫ߏдިᇹ۞ຍཌྷ̝˭ĉ23 ഈ۞ڍĶனѝഇķĞearly modernğĂт ࠧ៍ࠎңĉߏӎᄮᙊ͵ࠧ۞͞ёԛј࣎͵ࠧ៍ĉԧࣇߏӎΞдгဦăдᘱ͵ ഈޞ͵ࠧ៍ĉ24 д̝̚ѣңຍஉĉᇹ࠻זăдγϹ߆ඉ̚࠻ޙ൪ăд ઼̚ޓётңᇆᜩԧࣇ၆ன઼̚ϔ઼छ۞ᄮᙊĂ͍ன઼̚ߏଂ̂͞۞ ௲ࡩ҃ĉଂᇹ۞ᖼொ࿅̚ѣިᇹ۞ࡎᄃღૺᙯܼĉ
̚ٺధາΫࢋ೩ֽ۞̂યᗟߏĂԧࣇΞӎ̙གྷኳႷгۡତഈඈ˵ Ă઼่҃̚ߏ̚˘ొЊĉొ̶າ઼ޓĉᙱԧࣇ̙ྍෛࠎߏ˘Ķ႕߷ķ઼ ഈࠎײΫ۞ΫछЯѩ้ШдĶഈķᄃĶ઼̚ķมထ˭˘୧ࠧቢĂᔖҺჍ ĄޓࠎĶ઼̚ķ࠱ޓഈ࠱ײĶ઼̚ķĂ˵̙Ⴭ
ឰԧࣇՀୂٺѣӄڱĂЯࠎԧᄮࠎᇹ۞࠻ڱᙒТᇹ۞࠻˯ޘԧдߙ ڼᄃ̚රϔ઼ĞՀ̙ϡᄲᄃ̚රˠϔВ઼˞ğߏѣ̙Т߆઼ޓ̂זຍڦዟг ˵ពࢦᝑĂ۰มځ၁វĄӈֹдˠ˾ᄃгந˯ഈᄃன઼̚ڼϫᇾ۞̙Т߆ 1930ѐтᜪዯࣣזЪᓀĂְ҃၁˯ѣధкણमࡎ̝Ąଂ1910ă1920ܧ ౹ౄ˘࣎າϔ઼̚ޓഇࢬ၆тңଂ̂ܜඈۢᙊЊ̄۞͛ౢ̚Ξͽ࠻ֽĂࣇ ઼छ۞ᙱᗟĄ25 ̙ߏ˘Іᅅᗫ۞̍үĂԧࣇٕధΞᄲ࣎̍үҌ̫ਕϏԆ ഈॡځк͞ࢬഈౌͧԧࣇ˘ਠᄲ۞઼̚ăٕ۰ͧԇഈٕޝјĄЯѩĂߊд ˘ഈĶ઼̚ķ̝݈А൘Ꮲײ࣏۞઼̚ĂΒӣ۞ࢋкధкĂԧࣇѣநϤдჍ ĄᔵĂԧٚᄮԧТॡ˵ົፉ͕ԯ୧ĶഈķᄃĶ઼̚ķ̝ม۞ࠧቢ൪۞͉˭ Ăٕ۰ߏВ઼Ă઼ޓķĂኢιߏ࣎ͳ઼ă઼ڱࠎĶ઼ڱពĄலౣԧࣇჍځ࿅ ҋ̎۞ײؠܑιࣇ̝มυ၆Ⴭ࠹ඈĄѩγĂ႕߷ˠѣॡ˵Ⴭ˘̙֭ײჍ ᇹ۞ּזᙝᘟгĄԧд႔͛ᄃ႕͛ᑫ९̚ౌԱײࠎĶ઼̚ķĂӈֹߏჍ઼ޓ
22 Nicola Di Cosmo, “Qing Colonial Administration in Inner Asia,” 287-309. 23 參考Perdue, China Marches West與他的其他文章。 24 James Hevia, Cherishing Men from Afar; Philippe Forêt, Mapping Chengde: The Qing Landscape Enterprise; Laura Hostetler, Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China; Jonathan Hay, Shitao: Painting and Modernity in Early Qing China; Lydia Liu, The Clash of Empires; also useful is the review essay by Joanna Waley-Cohen, “The New Qing History,” 193-206. 25 王汎森的研究指出這一點。Wang Fansen, Fu Ssu-nien: A Life in Chinese History and Politics. 滿文檔案與新清史 15
႕͛ᑫ९۞ᆊࣃĄځę྆˫ГѨᙋ̄
αăඕāኢ
ώ͛ٙ೩۞៍၅̙֭Βӣ͵ࠧг͞۞൴ځдઇඕኢ̝݈ĂԧຐАᄲ ᙷҬ۞ޝາΫѣ۞זጯఙཏវᄃώ͛ٙ೩۞̚ܜѣ˘ཏјܮणĄּтд͟ώĂ Ą26 ࣇ۞ጯఙஅᄃለ࡚ጯ۰̙̂࠹ТĂࣃΩ͛ኢĄ೩̈́ᕇ۞Тڦᙯ ͛ౢ̙֭ߏࢋૺ႕͛ᑫ९ߏາΫࡁտ۞༰㛼Ă۞ޘॡĂԧ˵ࢋᄲቔѣࢨ ࣇ۞ሕдᆊࣃĄ࠹ͅ۞Ăͧొ̶д1930ѐזຍڦߏᄲѣ઼࡚ጯ۰ฟ̙ؕ˵ ซ̝ዅĄдᄂ៉ᄃ઼̚Ăޢಶฟؕࡁ࣎યᗟ۞͟ώΫጯ۰ĂԧࣇΪਕߏ ᙱΝෞҤޝѣ̈ొ̶۞ጯ۰ᜈ۞၆ѩ࠹ᙯᛉᗟ೩үݡĂ27 Ϊߏ၆ԧֽᄲԧ ѣкૻধĄΪѣдᙝᘟΫ࣎ᅳાΞڱг͞ѐᅅ˘ዅጯ۰၆႕͛ᑫ९۞࠻ֱ ࢨ۞֍ྋĄ28݀צ̙ྵז࠻ࣇ၆႕͛ᑫ९۞ࢦෛĂ̚ѣॡΞͽ࠻
۞˯д઼࡚ٕ۰˵Ξᄲдለ߷Ă༊۞ጯ۰ࢦາෞҤ˞႕͛Ϋफ़дࡁտΫ ̏˵ӈֹ̙ߏБొĂֽܕෛֱՄफ़Ă҃نഅགྷޘ˘ࢦࢋّĄጯ۰छࣇ࿅Ν ăۤົăགྷڼ߆ޙğĂдࢦזĞٕ۰ϒฟؕវᄮזགྷѣ࠹༊к۞ጯ۰វᄮ ᑻă̼͛ඈЧ̙ТᆸࢬՀԆፋ۞ဦည̚Ă႕͛ᑫ९ٙԷႊ۞ࢦࢋ֎ҒĄᄃ႕͛ ኢᄃநڱᑫ९జࢦາؠҜ۞ТॡĂдҘ઼̚͞Ϋछυؠࢋዎ࿃۞ăࡁտ઼̝̚͞ ᑅԺ۞ᓏࢰăజᔳᖟ۞ୃĂుצኢߛၹ˯ĂϺ൴Ϡ˞ॲώ۞ᖼតĂֹ̝݈҃ ႙гঙᕧࢬĄϒߏ۵̙Т۞ሗ߹ТॡϹົĂ͔ጱԧࣇனдٙᄲ۞າΫ ᎸĄ֭̚՟ѣ̦ᆃߏ۩݈۞ęтТٙѣ۞።ΫጯछౌజᏮᇹ۞ໄ۞ ՟ѣ̙ᕝ۞࣒ϒĂ።Ϋಶ̦ᆃౌ̙ߏĂ҃ٙѣᆷ۞р۞።ΫĂдߙڍĈтه Ă࠻࠻ֱࣹଂາΫٙ೩ֽ۞ኢޞߏ၆А݈።Ϋ۞࣒ϒęԧࣇυืඈౌ˯ޘ р۞ඕԊߏĂѣ˘͇ԧࣇ྆۞זᕇΞͽ఼࿅ॡม۞҂រĄ၆ѩĂԧࣇٙਕຐ ̝Ą҃פٙᄲ۞າΫົ࿅ॡĂ҃ົѣາ۞າΫ
26 這群學者包括:岡田英弘、片岡一忠、中見立夫、石橋崇雄、楠木賢道、柳澤明、石濱裕美子、 岡洋樹與杉山清彥。對近來此一趨勢的回顧見Kishimoto Mio岸本美緒,“The Ch’ing Dynasty and the East Asian World,” 87-109. 27 其中劉小萌、定宜莊、楊貞、杜家驥、賴惠敏等人的作品或許是最值得一提的。 28 值得一提的學者有馬大正、程崇德、華立。 16 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
͔ϡ३ϫ
˘ă็͛ᚥ ۏ߇झ͛ᚥበᏭ؎ࣶົበĂĮѐᘵಜݶၦᏭįˬΊĂᄂΔĈ઼ϲ߇झ౾ੰۏϲ߇झ౾઼ ੰĂ1971Ą Ă1977ĄۤۍበįĂᄂΔĈ͛ΫࣰܐĂĮጧႬΫफ़ڦఄР൴ᛌ
˟ăܕˠኢ ౘଥАĂĮ႕͛၁ᐂࡁտįĂᄂΔĈ̼̂३ԊĂ1978Ą ͛३ԊĂ1981ĄځౘଥАĂĮ႕͛ώࡔࡁտįĂᄂΔĈ Ĉ̳̚າ३Ă1979Ąִڌの͘৽įĂޓϣࡻσĂĮႧت ߶͛ऱĂ1972ĄڌĈִڌඈበĂĮ័ࡓၮąϒഈįĂ͈ܫৠϣ Bartlett, Beatrice S. “Books of Revelations: The Importance of the Manchu Language Archival Record Books for Research on Ch’ing History,” Late Imperial China 6.2 (December 1985): 25-36. ǕǕǕ. Monarchs and Ministers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991. Berger, Patricia. Empire of Emptiness. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2003. Chang, Michael. “A Court on Horseback: Constructing Manchu Ethno-Dynastic Rule in China, 1751-1784,” PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 2001. Cohen, Paul. Discovering History in China, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984. Cosmo, Nicola Di. “Qing Colonial Administration in Inner Asia,” International History Review 20.2 (June 1998): 287-309. Crossley, Pamela (ߟᆲ፷). Orphan Warriors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. ǕǕǕ. A Translucent Mirror and “The Rulerships of China,” American Historical Review 97.5 (December 1992): 1468-83. ǕǕǕ. A Translucent Mirror. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. Durand, Pierre-Henri. Lettrés et pouvoirs. Paris: EHESS, 1992. Elliott, Mark C. and James Bosson. “Highlights of the Manchu-Mongolian Collection,” in Patrick Hanan, ed., Treasures of the Yenching, Cambridge: Harvard-Yenching Library, 2003, 79- 122. Elliott, Mark C.. The Manchu Way. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. ǕǕǕ. The Manchu-Language Archives of the Qing Dynasty and the Origins of the Palace Memorial System,” Late Imperial China 22.1 (June 2001): 1-70. 滿文檔案與新清史 17
Farquhar, Judith and James Hevia. “Culture and Post-war American Historiography of China,” Positions 1.2 (1993): 486-525. Fletcher, Joseph F. “Review of Walter Simon and Howard G.H. Nelson, Manchu Books in London: A Union Catalogue,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 41.2 (December 1981): 653-663. Forêt, Philippe. Mapping Chengde: The Qing Landscape Enterprise. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000. Hay, Jonathan. Shitao: Painting and Modernity in Early Qing China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Hevia, James. Cherishing Men from Afar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995. Ho, Ping-ti. “In Defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski’s ‘Reenvisioning the Qing,” Journal of Asian Studies 57.1 (February 1998): 123-55. Hostetler, Laura. Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. Ko, Dorothy. Teachers of the Inner Chambers. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994. Kuhn, Philip. Soulstealers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. Kutcher, Norman. Mourning in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Liu, Lydia. The Clash of Empires. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. Millward, James A. et al., eds. New Qing Imperial History. New York: Routledge, 2004. ǕǕǕ. Beyond the Pass. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998. ώ࡚ჰ). “The Ch’ing Dynasty and the East Asian World,” Acta Asiatica 88ث) Mio, Kishimoto (2005): 87-109. Perdue, Peter. China Marches West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005. Polachek, James. The Inner Opium War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Council on East Asian Studies, 1992. Rawski, Evelyn S.. The Last Emperors. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988. Rhoads, Edward. Manchus and Han Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000. Saussy, Haun. Great Walls of Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001. Spence, Jonathan. Treason by the Book. New York: Viking, 2001. 18 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期
Spence, Joseph F. “Manchu Sources,” in Donald Leslie et al., eds., Essays on the Sources for Chinese History, Canberra: ANU Press, 1973, 141-146. Waley-Cohen, Joanna. “The New Qing History,” Radical History Review 88 (Winter 2004): 193- 206. Wang, Fansen (ͳѶ). Fu Ssu-nien: A Life in Chinese History and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.