<<

故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期(民國九十五年冬季) 1

႕͛ᑫ९ᄃາ୻Ϋ*

ለϲᇇ ݣҢ̂ጯ րځᄬ֏ᄃֲ͛ڌ

೩āāࢋ

ѣᙯ୻΃ॡഇጯఙࡁܕೀѐؕ΍ன۞ЩჍĂ׎ͅߍ୎ܕĶາ୻Ϋķ˘ෟĂ˜ߏ ઼࡚Ăҭд͟ώٕ׎΁г͞ྵາ۞ࡁտኢ඾̚ٺտ˯۞ࢭາّᔌ๕ĄѩЩෟᔵࢵ֍ ኜкࢋ৵Ă۞ڼຍဦ߽၅୻ഈ௚ٺజଳϡĄѩ˘ጯఙࡁտ۞͹ࢋপّĂ˜дھᇃ̏ ϲ֭ᅳጱ۞ొ̶Ąޙጐგιߏ˘઼࣎̚۞ͳഈĂҭݒߏϤ႕୉ٙٺ׎ߏ඾ࢦ͍

д఺࣎ు႙ԛј۞ጯఙࡁտߛၹ྆ĂΫጯछฟؕಶ઼̚።Ϋͽ̈́༊΃઼̚ϔ୉ ຍཌྷ˯೩΍າᛉᗟĄ˘ਠ҃֏Ăາ୻Ϋͽ߄ጼ႔୉͕̚ኢࢗćགྷ۞ڼ௡ј̚႕୉௚ ᆶෛ።ΫְІࠎ׎ϫᇾĄֽޘϤາ۞ቑёଣ৶࿅Ν)ּтതϔ͹ཌྷ*ć֭ͷϤᙝห֎ ԧࣇ۞።Ϋᄮۢ̚Ąҭߏٺ႔୉۞៍ᕇĂ֭ԯιፋЪܧᖎ֏̝Ăѩ˘ጯఙኝᗟ೬ϯ ߏۢᙊ˯۞ត̼ĂιТॡ˵Ӕனдᄬ֏˯Ăд఺͞ࢬ౵͹ࢋᇾᄫд่่ܧາ୻Ϋ֭ ଳϡ˞႔ᄬͽγ۞׎΁ᄬ֏੃ྶ̝͛ᚥĄϫ݈Ă႕ᄬ͛ᚥߏ׎̚౵ࢦ˯ڱࡁտ͞ٺ ࢋ۞Մफ़Ąдώኢ͛̚Ăԧ૟԰ࢋгᖎࢗ႕୉ᑫ९дາ୻Ϋ۞൴ण࿅඀̏̚གྷणன Ϗֽ̪૟޺ᜈԷႊ۞֎ҒĄٺͷ

ᙯᔣෟĈ୻΃።Ϋྤफ़ă႕͛Ϋफ़ă୻΃ΫጯΫă୻΃ᑫ९ă୻΃።Ϋă႕୉።Ϋ

* 本文初稿為「文獻足徵—第二屆清代檔案國際學術研討會」(臺北:國立故宮博物院,2005年11月 3~5日)之主題演講。感謝李仁淵先生在中文譯稿上的協助。 2 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

͛३ᑫ९˘ۡӛ͔඾̙Тˠࣇ۞۞عѺѐมĂ୻߆˘ܕҋଂ୻ഈඕՁҌ̫૟ ᄃᘹ͛ࠧˠۏˠڼෞኢ۰ă߆ົۤזᐡࣶăۏќᖟछă౾ۏĂଂ३થăΟڦᙯ ᏷঻˭ֽ۞ăজт໬ঔ۞͛ІĂ˵ѣ΁ࣇعćࠤҌߏౄ৽ຽ۰Ă၆఺ֱ݈୻߆̀ ҋ̎ຏᎸ኷۞ࣧЯĄ༊൒ឰౄ৽ຽ۰ຏᎸ኷۞ࣧЯĂᄃԧࣇᆅჸд఺ಞົᛉ۞ࣧ ЯБ൒̙ТĄ൒҃ԧ̙༰р؈Ăӈֹߏԧࣇ఺ֱ።Ϋጯ۰ĂΞ˵ߏࠎ˞Тᇹ۞ࣧ ఺྆ĉٕ۰఺ᇹᄲĂឰԧࣇᆅჸѩг۞ߏӎಶߏ࠹Т۞୻΃ᑫ९ĉЯࠎጐგזЯ ԧࣇ˘ᇹౌ၆୻ഈѣᎸ኷Ăԧࣇலౣᄃ఺ֱᑫ९ЧҋѣЧҋ۞ᙯాĄԧ่̙֭ߏ ѩ̙Тęᔵ൒఺˵ߏְكᄃҋ̎࠹ᙯ۞ᑫ९Ă҃఺ֱ࠹ᙯ۞ొ̶זᄲԧࣇΪ࠻ ၁Ąԧຐᄲ۞ߏĈԧࣇ่̙ߏֶೈ඾Чҋপؠ۞ྮश֕ˢ͵ࠧЧ፟ၹٙќᖟ۞୻ ԧࣇڍ΃͛३ᑫ९̚Ă҃Հࢦࢋ۞ߏĂԧࣇ˫ᐌ඾Чҋপؠ۞ྮश֕˞аֽĄт ୻ഈᑫ९âтЧ჌׎΁۞ᑫ९˘ᇹĂ่̙Ϊߏ͛३၁វ۞ᓁ׶Ğٕ۰఺ֱצତ ͛३ะវ۞х෬̝఍ğĂ҃Հߏ˘࣎хдԧࣇ͕̚ଣྙ࿅Ν۞఍ٙĂߏ˘࣎੃ጸ ၹ඾ҋ̎፾˘൑˟۞ᑫޙពгĂԧࣇЧҋځޝԛ๬ͷజࢦາԛ๬۞г͞Ă֤ᆃ ඾Ă՟ѣ׌Њᑫ९ົߏ࠹Т۞Ąק९Ą఺˵ຍ

᝘ֽ˵ధΟَĂ൒҃ԧᄮࠎĂଂԧࣇՏ࣎ˠౌߏͽЧҋ۞͞ёдڱ఺ᇹ۞ᄲ ።Ϋ͛३֤჌זৌ၁ّߏΞͽቁؠ۞Ąଂវᄮ۞ڱ३ᆷ።Ϋ۞఺ᕇֽᄲĂ఺࣎ᄲ ൒̿੓Ą֤ڵ˧ˠ̙щ۞ăТॡߏ඄˫ߏ၌۞ᗕࢦّኳ༊̚â჌౹ౄّ۞ૺ΄ ߏଂ఺჌ૺ˧༊ܮᗔᓏă֤ҲӤă֤ૺ˧ώ֗͞ߏ౵ৌ၁۞ᑫ९Ă҃ԧࣇ۞።Ϋ ࠎҋ̎൴ᓏĄڱኚϠĄтТ̂छ҅ሢਕྎ۞Ă።Ϋ͛३ώ֗ߏజજ۞Ă൑̚

ϲ੓Ķ୻΃ᑫ९׍ѣкᇹّޙԧ̝ٙͽଂ఺྆ฟؕԧ۞ኢᕇĂߏЯࠎԧᄮࠎ гЇϤԧࣇٽണᐩĂΞͽᅅـࢦࢋĄᑫ९̙֭ߏ൑Ϡ׻۞࿅ޝهᄃϠ׻˧ķ۞ໄ ౷ă̶ᙷᄃೢᏴĄᑫ९ߏ߿۞Ăιᄃॡ҃ዏă՟ѣࠧቢͷត̼кბĄ༊ԧࣇዦ̷ ώѨົᛉ۞ኢ͛Ăٕ۰ࢼᒟፋ࣎˼ត༱̼˫·႕኏ࡎ۞Ϋጯኢ඾ॡĂ˯ࢗ఺ᕇᜓ Ăౌͽ୻ഈ۞ᑫ९͛३ઇ̶ొ˘̂ޝன۞Հࠎព඾Ą҃఺ֱ඾үБొĂٕ۰ᄲܑ ׎̚ăٕ۰ᄲԧࣇڦࠎૄᖂĄԧ̝ٙͽૻአᑫ९۞Ϡ׻˧ᄃкᇹّĂ఺ֱԧࣇԸ ޢߏາ۞።Ϋᆷү̙ᕝՀϠ۞ࡦܮώ֗ӈࠎ׎̚˘ొЊ۞পኳĂߏЯࠎ఺ֱপኳ Я৵Ąٕ۰ѣˠົซ˘ՎؼҩѩኢᕇĂᄮࠎՏ࣎າ።Ϋ۞΍னౌᅮࢋາ۞ᑫ९Ą д఺ቔኢ͛̚Ăԧٕధົͅ࿅ֽᄲĂ͹ૺՏ࣎າᑫ९ౌᅮࢋ˘࣎າ።ΫĄ҃д఺ ϲд୻ഈ۞႕͛ᑫ९̝˯Ąޙቔ͛ౢ̚ԧٙᄲ۞າᑫ९Ăӈ

ᇹᄻĂι۞൴ण۞זдώ͛̚Ăԧ૟ೡᘱ఺࣎າᑫ९۞ᇹᄻĂٕ۰ߏԧٙ࠻ 滿文檔案與新清史 3

ᆃгՎĄԧ૟ࠎ̂छаᜪଂ఺ֱາᑫ९̚ᔞϠ۞າ።̦ז࿅඀Ăͽ̈́னд൴ण ΫĂ҃дඕኢ఍Ăԧχზᖎൺ۞੅ኢѩາ።Ϋಶԧࣇநྋ୻΃Ϋٕ˘ਠ҃֏۞̚ ΫֽᄲĂ׎ٙ׍ѣ۞ࢦࢋຍஉĄ઼

˘ă႕͛ᑫ९

үഇมܲх˭ֽ۞ᑫ९༊̚Ăࡗѣ׌Ѻྻعࡔ୻߆͵˩˟ז˛˩д˯˼༱І ༱ІĂӈࡗѺ̶̝˟˩۞ּͧĂБొٕొ̶ͽ႕͛३ᆷĄ׎̚Βӣ˞ЧёЧᇹ۞ Ϋफ़ĂтݶၦăᏞўăࡔᐂă༫ᅛăΫቇăˠְ੃ᐂă૳ϫඈඈĄೀͼՏ࣎୻߆ ͛३ೀͼ۞ܝă̙ТॡഇĂѣֱొܝѣ႕̳͛͛३ćᐌ඾̙Тొౌܝ͹ࢋొ۞ع Бొͽ႕͛३ᆷĄ1

ચߏͽ႕͛఍ந۞ְ͞ء۞̶ొعͽֽிٙ࠰ۢĄ୻߆˳ܜ఺ֱΫफ़۞хд ˠ͌ޝĂ҃ͷޘ఺ְ࣎၁༊൒̙ߏ̦ᆃ৪૜Ąӈֹ՟ѣˠۢ྽տౣቁ̷۞ֹϡ඀ ᄬ֏̝˘Ăপ͞ءਕ᝝ᑖĂҭߏ̂छౌۢ྽႕͛͛३അజֹϡĄ႕͛ߏ୻ഈ׌჌ অ۞႕͛фϓд༊ॡ۞઼̚ᐌ఍Ξ֍ĂΒ߁дᅚ᏿఺჌౵૱ֹϡ۞ఱ။˯Ăౌ័ ѣ႕͛фϓĄҌ͌дፋ࣎˩ˣ͵ࡔĂ୻ԗͽ႕႔׌჌ᄬ֏࿴Ҷ͹ࢋ߆३Ăͷ̳ฟ ࣶౌజࢋՐࢋጯ௫႕͛Ăͷሢۢ୻ԗྻүءгૻአჯ޺႕͛ਕ˧۞ࢦࢋّĄ੼৺ ܝဈొءߏ૟̙ТܮಏҜདϡ۞ˠĂ΁ࣇ۞઱˘̍үĂعˠౌۢ྽Ăధкజ߆۞ ͛३ଂ႕͛ᖙᛌј႔͛Ăٕଂ႔͛ᖙᛌј႕͛Ąࠎ˞႕֖఺ֱˠࣶ۞ᅮ۞ֽـม লሬᇄౌΞז३ĂឰЇңˠڱΞ៍ᇴณ۞ᙜ׏ă͘Ίᄃ͛˞ۍથ΍ۍՐĂΔִ΍ ዦᜓᏴᔉĄᔵ൒˩˝͵ࡔ۞઼͛̚ˠᄮࠎ႕͛۞ֹϡు႙਽ੜĂҭѩ͵ࡔ˭Ηཧ ࣶม۞Ϲঘ໛఼Ąءᄃ୻ഈٺҘ͞ˠĂ̪൒ᛇ଀ᑖ଀႕͛ѣӄ۞઼̚זֽ

Ă఺ֱᖞͳഈ۞႕͛͛३ฟؕд̝݈̙അ΍ன࿅۞ޢඕՁ̝ڼߏ༊୻ഈ௚ٺ г͞΍னॡĂ՟ѣˠົᛇ଀؈َĄ࠹ͅ۞Ă఺ֱྤफ़ଂ1910ѐ΃ฟ̳ؕฟ߹็Ă 1920ᄃ30ѐ΃Ăౌព଀тѩநٙ༊൒Ą఺ߏЯࠎĂ౹ౄ఺ֱ͛३۞זͷ޺ᜈ߹็ ৩Ԕ̙̏ೇхдĂ఺ֱ͛३၆઼छ˜ҌЇңˠ̙̏ГѣϡĄপҾߏιࣇͽᙱڼ߆ ε߆Ăߏጱ࡭༊˭઼๕౗л۞͹Я۞عͽᏰᙊ۞ள୉͛фᆷјĂ҃༊఺࣎ள୉߆ ĄГۏॡĂᔘѣኡົ၆఺ֱ͛३ѣᎸ኷ĉ̂छҋ൒ߏຐᕚ௲఺ֱ൑ϡ۞݈ഈ᏷̝

1 對這些資料更完整的回顧請參見Mark C. Elliott: “The Manchu-Language Archives of the and the Origins of the Palace Memorial System,” 1-70. 4 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

ξ۞ූٺߏ఺ֱజୢٺϔ઼ॡഇૻ̂۞ϔ୉ຍᙊֹ଀ˠࣇ̙Гጯ႕͛Ăٺ۰ĂϤ ࠎγ઼ˠٙ෴ΝĄ2 ੵ˞͌ᇴּγĂд఺࣎ॡഇΪౌޢЊ౵ొ˘̂ޝ႕͛ྤफ़ѣ ѣ˘ֱ͟ώᄃለ߷ጯ۰၆ќะᄃࡁտ఺ֱ႕͛३ᚱᑫ९ѣ˘ֱᎸ኷Ąкᓪ΁ࣇĂ ଂд୻ԗ۞ࡠ᎘ົି̀ฟؕ۞႕͛ࡁտ็௚଀ͽᚶᜈĄ఺ֱ˟˩͵ࡔ̚ཧ̝݈۞ ።Ϋ֭՟۞ޢ႕୉ˢᙯ̝ٺጯ۰Ăጐგ΁ࣇ̝̚ѣధкˠ۞႕͛ౄྔࠤָĂҭ၆ ޺ᜈֹ̪ޢᎸ኷ĄЯ҃тТ଀˞εጸা˘ਠĂ၆႕͛അд˩˛͵ࡔ̚ཧ۞̂ޝѣ ϡ۞੃ጸΞᄲౌజ٠ΝĄ

෱Α͈ጯ௫႕͛Ꮈ኷৿৿Ąྫྷѩॡ܅୻Ϋጯ۰၆۞ܐ఺ᇹ۞ᒖဩឰ˟˩͵ࡔ ೀͼ̙хдĄז୻ഈ႔͛͛३ᑫ९ͧ੓ֽĂ႕͛ྤफ़Ξͽᄲ͌۞ۍഇ̂ณበᚷ΍ ˞଀۞႕͛ྤफ़Ă˵఼૱ߏүࠎ႔͛ᑫ९۞ઘώ΍னĂ҃఺Հጱ࡭פໂ͌ᇴΞͽ ჌೼࿆۞ј֍Ăӈᄮࠎੵ˞1644ѐ̝݈۞ѝഇΫफ़̝γĂٙѣ۞႕͛ྤफ़ౌТ˘ ώĄ҃Ω˘჌೼࿆۞ј֍Հΐૻ˞Ķጯ௫႕͛՟ѣυࢋķۍॡхд඾࠹၆ᑕ۞႔͛ Ăᐌ̝ᄃ႔ˠТ̼Ă֭ͷಉε˞ᄃ႔ˠ࠹̶ޢĄӈᄮࠎ༊႕߷ˢᙯ̝ڱ఺჌ຐ۞ ˘ёώኳ˯ౌྫྷ႔ˠ͞ڼຐᄃ௚ޥĂߊ൒႕߷ˠ۞ڱҾ۞ડ࿣ຍᙊĄֶፂ఺࣎࠻ िᄃ៍ੈ۞זΫछд႔͛ྤफ़̚Ա̙זΞਕԱ̙ܮᇹĂ֤ᆃଂ఺ֱ႕͛ྤफ़Ă ෱͕˧Νጯ௫႕܅Ă֤˫ңυܮᕇĂ҃ߊ൒႔͛̂छౌᑖ଀Ăͷֹϡ੓ֽтѩ͞ ၁ĄЯְ۞ځజᄮࠎߏ൑ืᙋౌ˵ڱ͛ĉӈֹ၆ᑖ଀႕͛۞ጯ۰ֽᄲĂ఺ֱຐ ѩĂଂЇң˘ࢬֽ࠻Ăд఺࣎ॡഇĂࡶฟؕຐࢋᒢྋ୻ഈăٕᆷֱѣᙯ୻ഈ۞ Ăዦ᝝႕͛۞ਕ˧ౌ̙జ༊үߏυ౯۞୧ІĄ3ְ

ฟؕᖼតĄѣ኷۞ߏĂ఺࣎ᖼតೀͼТၙၙޘ൒҃ଂ1970ѐ΃ฟؕĂ఺჌ၗ ႕͛дࡁזຍڦॡдᄂ៉ă઼̂̚ౙᄃ͟ώ൴ϠĄдᄂ៉ĂౘଥАᄃఄР൴ࢵА ٙќᖟ۞୻ഈᑫ९֭ฟؕੰۏ።Ϋ۞ࢦࢋّĄ΁ࣇд൴ଧ߇झ౾̝ޢտ႕୻ˢᙯ ۍٙѣ႕͛ᑫ९ౌѣ႔͛ܧğ۞ॡ࣏Ă൴ன֭ۍĞ఼૱ᄃᇆώ˘੓΍ۍ૟̝΍ Įझ̚ᑫ૵Ⴇഈݶ۞ۍБ൒൑ϡĄ1977ѐ߇झ΍ܧώĂ҃ᑖ଀႕͛၆Ϋछֽᄲ֭ ͵੒ᚥĄᔵ൒఺Բᑫ९̙ߏௐ˘Բય̂ޝѣڱၦįௐˣăௐ˝ᏭĂ၆Լត఺࣎࠻

2 對這個主題參考:Mark C. Elliott and James Bosson, “Highlights of the Manchu-Mongolian Collection,” 80. 3 「即使是清朝初期,幾乎所有的滿文資料不是由漢文翻譯而來,便是已翻譯成漢文。對研究清朝 中晚期的歷史學者來說,滿文史料或許有用,但非必要。」Joseph F. Fletcher, “Manchu Sources,” 145. 滿文檔案與新清史 5

႕͛ᑫ९ߏ1971ѐ׌ѺዶІ۞ޢഈ̝ڼึ۞ۍ႕͛ᑫ९Ğௐ˘Բ΍۞ޢ̝ڼึ۞ ࿥ϒ័۞ۍ߶͛ऱ1972ѐ΍ڌѐᘵಜ႕͛ݶၦğĂ4 ҭ̙ߏѐᘵಜݶၦĂ˵̙ߏ۞ ຍĄ่̙ఄР൴ͽ׎̚ڦ۞ھࡓၮᑫĂ5 ҃ߏ఺˘Բᑫ९Ăௐ˘Ѩ͔੓Ϋጯࠧᇃ በįĂ6 ҃ќᐂдĮझ̚ᑫ૵ܐ౵ѣ኷۞˘ֱᑫ९ĂᖼԨᖙᛌࠎĮ୻΃໤ጧႬΫफ़ ІᇆώĂ˵ᇆᜩ˞͟ώΫछܫ੅ጧႬ̜ॡ۞႕͛فႧഈݶၦįௐˣă˝Ꮽ̚૵Ⴇ ĂڍϑįĄ7 ଂዦ᝝఺ֱјܫ۞ޓགྷ׏඾үĮ૵Ⴇ࠱ۍϣࡻσĂឰ׎д1979ѐ΍ت ͽ̈́ଂౘଥА۞Į႕͛୻၁ᐂࡁտįă8Į႕͛୻ώࡔࡁտį9 ̚Ăጯ۰ࣇฟؕΞͽ ።Ϋ˵࠹༊ѣϡĄ۞ޢĂ႕͛Մफ़၆ࡁտ႕୻ˢᙯ̝ז୻຾۞ᒢྋ

٢๒˞˘̈ཏѐᅅă҃གྷ࿅˵ࡗдТॡĂд઼̂̚ౙ۞Δִௐ˘።Ϋᑫ९ᐡ পҾ੊ቚ۞૞छጯ۰Ă඾͘ፋந˘Ϋᐡ۞႕͛ќᖟć఺ֱќᖟ̚Ăѣֱొ̶Ξᄲ ׌ˬѺѐֽౌ՟ѣˠତᛈ࿅Ąд1980ѐ΃ѝഇĂ༊ௐ˘።Ϋᑫ९ᐡฟؕШጯఙࠧ ࢋᕩΑ̶ొ̂ޝĂ႕͛ᑫ९۞ࢦࢋّд઼̚˵ు႙జវᄮĄ఺ޢ׎ొ̶ᐡᖟٸฟ ٺ1981ѐ౹Ώ̝າഇΏĮ።Ϋᑫ९į˯Ώྶ۞႕͛Ϋफ़ᖙᛌĂͽ̈́׎΁тฟؕٺ ݡĄдፋ࣎ˣŒѐ΃Ă൑ኢдᄂۍ1978ѐ۞Į୻΃ᑫ९Ϋफ़ᕍበįඈপҾ۞΍ ႕͛үࠎ୻Ϋࡁտ̝ጯఙᄬ֏۞ࢦࢋّĂฟؕѣ෸ֽٺă઼̂̚ౙٕ͟ώĂᙯ៉ ΍னĄځ෸кᙋ

႕͛Մफ़ࢦࢋّ۞ВТЯ৵Ă͹זт˯ٙࢗĂᄂ៉ᄃ઼̂̚ౙጯࠧు႙វᄮ ԣгᖼត˞Чгጯ۰ࡁտ୻ޝѐֽĶаᕩᑫ९ķ۞ᔌ๕Ă҃఺࣎ᔌ๕ܕࢋߏЯࠎ Ϋ۞͞ёĄԧ˵ԓ୕ΞͽᄲĂ݈ࢗϤѩĶаᕩᑫ९ķᔌ๕ጱ͔΍ֽ۞ăࢦາវᄮ Ăౄј۞ࢦ̂ᖼតĂΞឰధк఺࣎ᅳા۞ጯϠฟؕጯ௫႕ه႕͛ࢦࢋّ۞າໄ тѩĄੵ˞д͟ώೀ࣎ࢦࢋጯܧ͛ĂͽഇΞͽྻϡд΁ࣇ۞ࡁտ˯Ą൒ְ҃၁֭ ఙ͕̚۞ࡁտϠࢋጯ௫˘ѐͽ˯۞႕̝͛γĂ൑ኢдᄂ៉઼ٕ̂̚ౙĂౌϏഅॲ ώгෞҤ࿅૟ጯ௫႕͛ৼˢ౾̀঱੊ቚ˘ొЊ۞υࢋّĄጐგд׌гౌѣֱ׍ѣ ᐍჟৠ۞ˠĞΒ߁Δִ̚δϔ୉ጯੰͳᔨᎰ۞˘ֱጯϠğՙؠጯ௫႕͛Ă൒݂҃

4 國立故宮博物院故宮文獻編輯委員會編,《年羹堯奏摺專輯》三冊。 5 神田信夫等編,《鑲紅旗.雍正朝》。 6 莊吉發譯注,《清代準噶爾史料初編》。 7 岡田英弘,《康熙帝の手紙》。 8 陳捷先,《滿文清實錄研究》。 9 陳捷先,《滿文清本紀研究》。 6 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

Ұࢍ൪ࢋࡁտ˩˛͵ࡔ݈ΗഇνΠ۞୻ܧវ˯ᄃ̝݈࠹ТĈੵ̂ޘ၆႕͛۞ၗ ΫĂҰ̙ϡፉ͕႕͛۞યᗟć҃ጐგѣᄃҰ͹ᗟ࠹ᙯ۞ࢦࢋՄफ़ͽ႕͛ᆷјĂҰ ώಶΞͽ˞Ąᖙᛌд႕͛ᑫ९ٙ̚Էႊ۞֎ҒߏΩۍϡፉ͕ĂЯࠎҰϡ႔ᛌ̙˵ ˘࣎ኝᗟĂൾޢԧ૟Гаᐝ੅ኢĄ

Ąд1970ѐ΃Ă೼࿆ၙޝԼត۞˵ޘд઼࡚ĂтТд઼̚˘ᇹĂ၆႕͛۞ၗ ˞זߏᄮࠎĂੵ˞ࡁտ࠹༊ѝഇ۞୻ΫͽγĂ՟ѣυࢋጯ௫႕͛Ą൒̪҃ڱ࠻۞ ႕͛ࢦࢋّ۞ੈिฟؕࠎጯࠧٙۢĄͽ׎ࡁտ࢕፟఍۞үݡٺഇĂᙯܐ1980ѐ΃ Ąдсۏ઼࡚ጯࠧ۞ࢦࢋˠזჷЩ۞Ϩ૽ළĞBeatrice Bartlettğߏ૟ѩੈि็྿ ߏ႔͛ᑫ९۞่ܧซҖ۞ࡁտ࿅඀̚Ăс൴ன˞႕͛ᑫ९඗ੰۏ߇झ౾ٺ̶ొ̂ сᄃఄР൴޺ᜈ۞Ϲೱຍ֍Ąд1985ѐΏ΍۞˘ቔ͛ౢٺઘώĂ҃఺ొ̶ࢋᕩΑ ༊̚Ăсۡତౘࢗ఺࣎ኢᕇĈ 關於清朝滿文檔案廣為接受的認識是:以研究歷史課題來說,清史學者 幾乎沒有必要去學習滿文、或者使用滿文史料。……然而與現今的看法 相反……許多清朝中葉甚至晚期的滿文檔案,從未被翻譯成漢文。未來 的清史學者應該會清楚地發現學習滿文相當值得。10

఺࣎າੈिᙋ၁˞Joseph FletcherĞᄃϨ૽ළܲ޺ᓑᘭğೀѐ݈̖ᄲ۞Ĉ ࢋઇௐ˘߹۞ᑫ९̍үĂυืࢋጯ௫႕͛Ă֭ڍĶଂனдฟؕâ࣎୻Ϋጯ۰т ͷགྷ૱ͧྵᄃ׎ࡁտ͹ᗟ࠹ᙯ۞႕႔Ϋफ़Ąķ11

ᑫ९̝ĶዩፁିצϨ૽ළ۞͛ౢ൴ܑ࡚̚ᙯܼ̏ϒ૱̼̝ᅫĂ఺ឰࡁտϠତ ֈķ۞఺Іְ่̙ΪߏΞਕĂ҃ՀߏυࢋͷΞҖĄྤஎጯ۰ࠤҌՀѣ፟ົଂ఺າ ႕͛ᑫ९࠹၆ֽᄲᇴณࠤ຋Ă఺ֱᑫ۞ۍฟ൴۞ࡁտݵ፟̚ᒔৈĄЯࠎӈֹ̏΍ ዦĄҭߏĂтТдᄂ៉ᜓٽ९னдౌΞдᄂ៉ăΔִᄃᕬว۞ೀ࣎͹ࢋќᖟ఍ᅅ ᇹĂд઼࡚ࡁտ୻Ϋ۞ጯϠ֭՟ѣଷ੓ጯ௫႕͛۞ࢲሗĂЯ˘ڶᄃ઼̂̚ౙ۞ଐ Ӏϡќᖟд఺ֱг͞۞႕͛ᑫ९ĄҬͼߏ̂छౌд៍୕Ăຐ࠻࠻ᑖڱѩ΁ࣇ˵൑ ଀႕͛ߏӎৌ଀ΞͽԼត΁ࣇ၆୻ഈ۞៍ᕇĂឰ΁ࣇ۞୻Ϋࡁտѣ̙ٙТĄ

10 Beatrice S. Bartlett, “Books of Revelations: The Importance of the Archival Record Books for Research on Ch’ing History,” 33. 11 Joseph F. Fletcher, “Review of Walter Simon and Howard G.H. Nelson, Manchu Books in London: A Union Catalogue,” 653. 滿文檔案與新清史 7

ăາ୻Ϋ۞ទᏭ˟

ଂ൴ன႕͛ᑫ९่̙Ϊߏ႔͛ઘώĂ҃ώ֗ӈၹј˞ࡁտ୻Ϋ۞፾ϲՄफ़۞ ព҃ࢦࢋ۞યᗟ͔ҩ˞΍ֽĈ఺ֱᑫ९ᄲ˞̦ᆃĉՀࢦࢋ۞ߏĂιځкޝ఺ᕇĂ ࣇᄲ˞̦ᆃ႔͛ᑫ९՟ᄲ۞ְĉࠤٕĂߊ൒႕͛ߏтѩᄃ႔̙͛ТĂӈֹдܑࢬ д႔͛̚൴ڱ࠹၆ᑕ۞͛І̚Ăιࣇࢋтңࢗᄲ࠹Т۞ְĉѣңᔳ຋̝ள൑˯ ԧࣇฟؕዦ᝝΁ࣇͽҋ̎۞ᄬ֏३ᆷ۞͛ІăଂҌ̫Քᐵ൑ᓏ۞႕߷֤ڍனĉт ҋ࿅Ν۞ֽז൒ॏ॓نࢬ೩યĂԧࣇ၆୻ഈ۞៍ᕇົтңԼតĉ఺ಶтТԧࣇ˘ ٺາᐛதă൴ன࿅Ν۞Ω˘჌ᓏࢰĂ҃఺ֽ࣎ҋ࿅Ν۞າᓏࢰΞͽۡତ၆Ч჌ᙯ ߏၹј˞ன̫ٙᏜĶາ୻Ϋķ۞ૄܮ႕߷ᄃ୻ഈ۞າયᗟ೩΍аᑕĄ఺ֱયᗟĂ ᖂĄ൒҃Ă఺ֱາ۞યᗟߏ̦ᆃĉଂңֽ҃ĉ҃Ķາ୻Ϋķ۞ຍཌྷ˫дࣹ྆ĉ

˘۞˭ᖎಏ۞ᄲĂԧᄮࠎາ୻Ϋ۞͹ࢋপᕇߏĂ̂छౌᄮৌгࢦҤ̂୻߆௚ ৩ԔߏᄃĶ୻ഈߏ˘઼࣎̚۞ͳഈĂҭТॡϺߏڼࢋ৵Ă҃পҾߏ඾ࢦ఺࣎߆ֱ ķ۞ְ၁࠹ᙯాĄາ୻Ϋ̙ᙒј૟୻ഈ่ෛࠎߏ˫˘࣎ڼϲăٙ௚ޙϤ႕߷ˠٙ ഈ࠹ϼĂ่ߏдܑࢬ˯ѣ˘ֱԼតĄ൒҃າ୻Ϋ۞ځͳഈĂٕ۰ᄮࠎ୻ഈᄃ઼̚ ።Ϋ඾ү۞˘ֱૄώ̝ק߄ጼ˞઼̚ϔ୉͹ཌྷăͽ̈́૲ѣϔ୉͹ཌྷຍ̏ڱ఺჌࠻ ֱ˘˞ѩ೩΍ٺ໤݋âֱкᇴ˟˩͵ࡔன΃઼̚Ϋ඾үٙᏲೈ۞໤݋Ąາ୻Ϋ д઼̚።Ϋ˯۞ຍཌྷĂТॡ˵ᄃ઼̚ன΃ϔڼયᗟĂ఺ֱયᗟ่̙੅ኢ˞႕߷௚ Ă႕˭ڶ୉઼छ۞ԛј࠹ᙯĄ҃׎׌࣎͹ࢋયᗟߏĈௐ˘Ăдˠᇴтѩං͌۞ଐ ႔ˠ௚ܧĉௐ˟Ă୻ഈࠎ႕߷ˠ҃ڼ߷ˠтң၆тѩኑᗔ۞߆វჯ޺఺ᆃ˳۞௚ ఺ᕇĂ၆઼̚ă઼̚ˠϔͽ઼̈́̚።Ϋୃֽࢗᄲѣ̦ᆃमள̝఍ĉ఺ֱૄώયڼ ᗟౌ̙ߏາ۞ĂࠤҌΞᄲ၆Տ࣎୻Ϋጯछֽᄲౌ̏ߏགྷ׏યᗟĂҭ၆Ķ႕߷ˠߏ Ą఺ֱϒߏ͔ጱ΍Ķາֽז̏ג҂఺ֱયᗟ۞ॡޥኡķ۞ࢦາវᄮĂϒពϯࢦາ ୻Ϋķ۞ૄώኝᗟĄ

ధѣֱˠົ̙Тຍ˯ࢗ၆Ķາ୻Ϋķّኳ۞ೡࢗĂ҃ᄮࠎ఺ᇹ۞ؠཌྷ͉࿅˵ ĞԧҬͼдّ̣ٸฟ۞ޘব৫Ąቁ၁Ă఺࣎࠹၆҃֏ྵາ᎖۞ෟຉ̪ܲ঻ߙ჌඀ ιğĄ൒҃˯ࢬזݡ˯࠻ۍѐ݈ௐ˘Ѩֹϡ఺࣎ෟຉĂ҃׌ˬѐ݈ฟؕдϒё΍ ٙᄲ۞ߏ̫͟ԧຐࢋ੅ኢ۞ؠཌྷĄ

1980ѐזຐ੓໚Ăԧຐ޽΍׌࣎͹ࢋሗ߹Ă׌۰ౌΞͽ੠໖ޥາ୻Ϋ۞ٺᙯ ഽ̷Ąд઼̚ࡁտ۞ᅳ۞ڱ΃Ą׎˘ֽҋధкѐᅅጯ۰၆Լតࡁտ઼̝̚ૄώ͞ 8 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

ા̚Ăѣֱጯ۰˘͞ࢬᛇ଀็௚႔ጯछ͉࿅Ք໡дᄬ֏͛ф۞൑቎҂ፂ̝̚Ăҭ ႕Ą౵ѣ̙זĶડાࡁտķሀёጯ۰۞ĶҘ͕̚͞ķઐ֍ຏٺΩ͞ࢬ˫၆кΗ΍ 1984ѐٙ೩΍۞ԲෞĄ΁೩࣍˘࣎Ķͽ઼̚ٺЩ۞ּ̄ߏߟܲщĞPaul Cohenğ ˟ࠎ͕̚ķ۞઼̚ΫࡁտĂͽྯ௲૟઼̚۞ԼតౌෛࠎߏаᑕҘ͞۞៍ᕇĄ12 ௐ ன΃͹ཌྷ၆ྃϒ઼̚Ϋ఺࣎д።Ϋࡁտޢ۵ሗ߹ߏֽҋ˘ཏѐᅅጯ۰Ă΁ࣇᄮࠎ ˧ѣϡ఍ĄּтĂӈֹည౮ࡊ఺ᇹ˘࣎ѣᇆᜩޝநኢّ࠹၆҃֏ྵళͻ۞ᅳા̚ ຐछĂ઼̪̚Ϊਕߏ˘࣎ϡֽ΃ܑٙѣҘ͞ͽγ̝Οَࠍ؈۞௑ཱིĂ఺ѣ̦ޥ۞ ॲஎའ׽̚טޙ઼࡚႔ጯޞᆃ۞Я৵ăѣ̦ᆃᇹ۞ຍཌྷĉ13 ˫тĂԧࣇтңֽ࠻ Ķᐖၗ̼͛͹ཌྷ۞͕ၗķĞstatic culturalist mentalityğĉ14 Ωγ˘ཏጯ۰˵ฟؕ۞ ઼̚ٺኳႷĂߏӎΪѣҘ͞۞઼̚Ϋछ૟׎̼͛ઐ֍૲ˢࡁտ༊̚Ă҃˘ֱஎങ ጯࠧ̚۞ྚᛖ׏ቑ̙ᅮࢋజोֽࢦາᑭរĉ఺࣎ኳႷдࡁտ઼̚็௚ۤົᙝቡཏ ႔ኜ୉ę۞ጯ۰ࣇ༊̚পҾૻধĄ15 ၆΁ࣇֽᄲĂĶͽ઼̚ܧវęΒ߁ّ̃ᄃ ͹ཌྷ۞ࡁտ͞ڌϲ˘࣎ྯ௲ޙࠎ͕̚ķ۞઼̚Ϋ̏གྷ̙ૉ˞ĄтТለ࡚ጯ۰୬ ႔΁۰ܧĂĶາ୻Ϋķ۞ࡁտ˵ವՐྯ௲Ķ̂႔୉͕̚͹ཌྷķ۞݀ࢨĂ൴னڱ Ğnon-Han otherğ۞៍ᕇĂ֭૟̝ፋЪซ၆ፋវ઼छᄃۤົ͟ৈᆧΐ۞ᒢྋ༊ ࡁտ۞઼ޓˢ˘࣎ͧྵّ۞ෛࠧĂ૟၆̂୻ٸڼĄѩࡁտТॡ˵ဘྏ૟႕୉௚̚ ϲޙࡁտ֭ཉę̙Ϊߏ઼̚׎΁ͳഈĂ҃Հߏ͵ࠧ׎΁г͞ęͽ۞઼ޓᄃ׎΁ ĂТॡ˵ΒӣڌܕΒӣֲ߷۞׎΁гડᄃ઼่̙ޓ࣎ͧྵΫጯ۞ૄᖂĂͧྵ۞˘ ለ߷Ą

჌̷࢝˘זຐሗ߹۞኏ᑝឰາ୻Ϋጯ۰׶׎΁˘ֱጯ۰˘ᇹĂౌវົޥ఺ֱ ᅮࢋĂӈᅮࢋ૟઼̚ࡁտᄃ၆።Ϋ۞ࡁտăͽ̈́၆Бវˠᙷགྷរ۞ࡁտĂ൑ኢ۞ ኢ˯ĂౌՀѣ፟гăՀღ૜гඕЪд˘੓Ąд˯࣎͵΃Ă఺ֱሗڱдநኢ˯ᄃ͞ Ăౄјڱ߹̏၆็௚˯ࠎ઼̚Ϋछăٕ˘ਠ҃֏۞઼̚૞छೠ೪۞ࡁտᛉᗟᄃ͞ ఺ᇹ۞ត̼ĂՀҾᄲ̙ߏٙѣˠౌྫྷז֍ٺٙѣˠౌሄܧዩજĄ൒֭҃۞̂ޝ˞

12 Paul Cohen, Discovering History in China. 13 如Haun Saussy的討論:Haun Saussy, Great Walls of Discourse, 146 ff. 14 Judith Farquhar and James Hevia, “Culture and Post-war American Historiography of China,” 486- 525. 15 例如高彥頤(Dorothy Ko)在其書前言中批評婦女史中的五四敘述。見Dorothy Ko, Teachers of the Inner Chambers,以及米華健在其書前言中呼籲一個「以清朝為中心」的清史。James Millward, Beyond the Pass. 滿文檔案與新清史 9

ᐌ඾఺࣎ត̼ĄጐგтѩĂԧࣇ఺࣎ᅳા̏གྷдధк̙Т͞ࢬ˯ౌ̏ᖼត˞Ąາ ć΍ି؟д̙Т͹ᗟ৾৾΍னĈّ̃Ϋćᗁᒚăઉ૵ᄃ֗វćᆇёᄃڍࡁտј۞ ᄃ३ᚱΫćˠ˾௚ࢍćགྷᑻҖࠎඈĄၙၙ۞Ăጯఙෟຉ̙ᕝត̼ă҃ጯఙ੅ኢۍ ޓາᅳા྆Ăԯ઼̚୎ഇ۞̚ܜՀࠎБࢬĄтѣ˘ొ̶ጯ۰ฟؕд͵ࠧΫ఺࣎ј ᔌШ̝˭۞யݡĂኳႷઐШҘڼΫৼˢ҂ณĄ͵ࠧΫώ֗ಶߏ˘࣎ጯఙᄃ߆઼ Ϋ۞ۢᙊវրĄ༊Б࡚۞̂ጯϠ׎࣒ٙ௫۞ૄᖂ።ځăᄮࠎҘ͞ಶ΃ܑ͵ࠧ͛͞ Ϋķ҃ߏĶ͵ࠧΫķĂ҃༊Б࡚ౌѣିࣶࢋି଱఺࣎ኝ඀ځΫኝ඀̙ߏĶҘ͛͞ ൒ត଀ࢦࢋ੓ֽĂ҃఺ߏ݈ٙϏѣ۞ְĄ୻ഈߏنΫֲڌॡĂ઼ٕ̚˘ਠٙᄲ۞ ณາ᎖۞ă׍̂ٺព̙࿅۞г̝͞˘Ă൒҃ᕩΑځࠧΫᄃ઼̚Ϋ۞Ϲົ༊̚౵͵ ѣԲҿّ۞ጯఙࡁտĂឰтңӔன୻ഈΫјࠎ˘Њтѩჟ૾ѣ኷ă׍ѣ߄ጼّ۞ ̍үĄ

ĄтТ݈ࢬٙᄲ۞Ă׎׍ѣ۞፾পۏາ୻ΫΞͽߏᄲ఺჌ዩજ̝˭۞ࢦࢋய ͹ཌྷ׶തϔ͹ཌྷğΝ઼ޓЇચߏ߄ጼ̂႔୉͕̚͹ཌྷ۞ୃࢗăͽ׎΁۞ቑёĞт ڍଣ৶࿅ΝĂͽ̈́ଂᙝቡ۞៍ᕇᆶෛ።Ϋ൴णĄٕధΞͽᄲາ୻Ϋ۞ࣰጯęт ጨijĈĶ̙ᙊᘁ̋ৌࢬϫĂΪቡڒ඾ЩྐήIJᗟҘ۞؂ڌѣ۞ྖęк͌тТᛂ дѩ̋̚Ąķүࠎ˘࣎Ν͕̚۞ࢍ൪Ă׎̏ခજ˞Հᆵᇃ۞ጯఙ੅ኢĂΒ߁ᄮ֗ ຍ۞ᗟՄĄ҃тĶຐည۞ВڦѐֽԧࣇВТٙܕඈඈĂ఺઼ֱޓТăϔ୉͹ཌྷă ௚ķăĶгቡ၁វķĞgeo-bodiesğᄃ઼୉ϫ۞ኢඈĂٙѣኳ็۞ځТវķăĶజ൴ צĂౌᄃາ୻Ϋ۞ᙯᘃ࠹ᙯĄѩγĂາ୻Ϋ˵ତهႷϔ୉઼छ̝ҋ൒ّኳ۞ໄ Ă૟ᄮТ۞Ķְ၁ķొ̶યᗟهĶ୉ཏķĞethnicityğᄃĶள̎ķĞalterityğ۞າໄ Ą఺࣎நኢ้ШĂឰາ୻Ϋ၆઼̚఺࣎Ķ઼छķ҃֏Ă׍ѣሕд۞ᙹᖬّĂଂ̼ ̚ฟୁ˞Ķ̦ᆃߏĺ઼̚ĻĉķăĶјࠎĺ઼̚ˠĻߏ̦ᆃຍޥĉķඈયᗟĄҭ ಶߏᖣ඾೩΍఺ֱયᗟĂາ୻ΫЯ҃Ξͽ෹෸ౘᖞ۞႔̼ྋᛖĂՀஎˢ႕߷௚˵ ࢦࢋયᗟĄ۞̚ڼ

൒҃Ăາ୻Ϋ่̙֭ߏ˯ࢗᄮᙊኢ۞ᖼШĂ҃Тॡ˵ߏ˘჌ᄬ֏ጯ۞ᖼШĄ ຐሗ߹Ăͽ̈́႕͛үࠎ˘჌ጯఙᄬ֏ޥೱήྖᄲĂߏ˯ࢗ۞ᖼொጯఙᔌШ۞׌۵ ࢦາ൴னĂВТጱ͔΍າ୻Ϋ۞ࡁտĄԧຐкᇴˠౌົТຍĂາ୻Ϋࡁտд͞۞ ኢ˯۞͹ࢋপҒߏֹϡ႔ᄬ̝γ۞ᄬ֏ᆷј۞ྤफ़Ă่̙ߏΒ߁႕ᄬĂ˵Βӣڱ ᄬٕࡻᄬĄ൒҃ڱᄋᄬăᖟᄬăჯӍႬᄬăᔹᄬă͟ᄬăᕓᄬĂࠤҌߏܻᄬă˞ ϫ݈ࠎͤ႕͛Ϋफ़̪౵ࠎࢦࢋĂЯѩд఺྆ԧ۞ෞኢ˵Ϊ੫၆႕͛ొ̶Ąԧٙࢋ 10 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

ۍ೩΍ֽ۞ѣ׌࣎ࢬШĄ׎˘ߏ႕͛ᑫ९âткᇴ۞ࣧؕՄफ़Ăົ೬ᜨགྷ࿅΍ γ۞Җ̝ט࿅඀۞Մफ़ٙ̚ପᄏ۞ొ̶Ăӈֱ֤ᄃ઼छϲಞ၆ϲăٕ۰д઼छវ ̝ۍ΍̏ٺજ۰۞ᓏࢰĂٕ۰Ҍ͌ߏᄃ઼छ̝มᙯܼᑩߎሀቘ۞ˠ۞ᓏࢰĄ࠹ྵ फ़ઐШ޽ШّĞprescriptiveğĂଂ઼छְચ۞၁ᅫેҖ̚யϠ۞͛३ᑫ९ྤ͞ء ՟ѣᔳᎍĂ҃҃ځ݋఼૱ߏೡّࢗĞdescriptiveğ۞Ą఺̙֭ຍᏜ఺͛३ᑫ९౅ ࢗ۞ܑࢬ̝˭ྵࣧؕϏ࣒࿹۞Մफ़Ă҃ЯѩΞͽୃ͞ءҌ͌ߏ఺ֱᑫ९౅ᜨՀк ឰԧࣇ೩΍Հᆵᇃ۞યᗟĄ

ᓁߏĂୁϯ႔͛Մफ़ٙ̚ᔳᖟ۞ְܧΩ˘࣎ࢬШߏĂ႕͛ᑫ९఼૱Ăᔵ൒֭ ព۞ְ၁Ĉιߏͽ႕͛ᆷјĄ఺΃ܑځ႕͛ᑫ९౵ࢦࢋă˵ߏ౵זଐĄឰԧࣇа ඾ᑫ९ߏϤ˘჌̙Т۞фវᆷјĂߏͽ႕͛фϓĞٕקᆃӣຍ׸ĉࢵАĂ఺ຍ̦ ͽ႔фࠎૄᖂĄ఺჌фវҋ൒гឰ୻ഈᄃ˼ѐܧ۰ࢰ༼Ăֶ̙Т៍ᕇ҃ؠğĂ҃ ඾఺קᙉրĞΒ߁ᄋΟᄃаࡖğాඕд˘੓Ą׎ѨĂ׎ຍ઼ޓૻ̂۞ֲ߷̰ౙֽ ϲ੓ֽĂ׎ֹϡ۞ෟຉٕᄬήϏυΞдޙෟຉڼ߆۞઼̚ٺᑫ९̂ొ̶ͽ̙Тֱ ቁ̷۞၆ᑕĂ҃Հ̙ϡᄲߏࡻ͛˞ĄೱήྖᄲĂ఺ߏ˘჌ܑன΍ҋ̎ז͛̚Ա̚ ፾পགྷរᄃ፾পຏّ۞ᄬ֏Ą఺̙֭ߏᄲ႕͛ͧ੓႔͛ߏՀр۞ᄬ֏Ăٕ۰ᄲߏ Ăд఺̙۞זՀᆊࣃ̚ϲ۞ᄬ֏Ą൒҃ιಶߏ˘჌̙˘ᇹ۞ᄬ֏ĄтТԧൾѝ೩ ۡ˘ࢰሄ۞זтТԧࣇ̝݈ٙ᝘ܮΞͽᄃ႕ᄬአ׶ĂڍТ̝̚ѣஎᅈ۞ຍཌྷĄт ௐ˟࣎ᓏࢰĂ҃ଂ఺˟ࢦભ̚ΞͽயϠ΍າ۞׶זߏ፾ݶĂ҃ԧࣇனдฟؕ᝘ ߏ൴ன˞˘჌າ۞ࢰሄĄ൒҃൑ኢߏ̦ᆃࣧٺ௙ă̙׶Ꮨࢰᄃ̷̶ࢰć఺ಶඈ ࢋֹϡڍЯĂд఺࣎ࢬШ̚Հஎˢ۞˘ᕇߏĂЯࠎ఺ֱᑫ९ߏͽ႕͛ᆷј۞Ăт ιĂԧࣇಶ଀ጯ௫ͽ႕͛Ν᝝ιĄ

ᕇĄࠎ̦ᆃ׸ĉࢵАĂ఺ߏ˘۞צᕇĂᄲֽ؈َĂٕధߏ౵ᙱΝତ˘ޢ఺౵ ࢋՐˠࣇΝઇ˘ְֱଐĂΝጯ௫΁ࣇٙᔘϏ׍౯۞ԫਕĄтТĮఄ̄įٙ̚ᄲ۞ ၁ᕩķĂυืࢋ૟ҋ̎஬̄̚۞ͪࣆ˘ֱ΍ֽĂ̖Ξਕ྅າ۞ซΝĄ൒ְ҃ـĶ෍ ᓁߏтѩᖎಏĄጯ௫႕̙͛Ϊߏ᝝Հк३ăӛќՀкநኢٕᑭዦՀкྤܧଐ֭ ă൴णາфຉĂ֭ͷ၆˘჌າ۞͛фૈዳ΍ຏᛇֽĄጯ௫႕ڱफ़ć҃ߏ௫଀າ͛ ጯ௫ז̙֭͛ߏপҾӧᙱĂ̙҃тᄲߏࢋѣॡมĄॡม˵ߏ࣎Я৵Ă༊ԧࣇវᄮ ιğΝ၁ᅫዦ᝝႕͛ྤޞ႕͛΃ܑԧࣇѣ፟ົĞٕ۰ᄲѣཌྷચęБ࠻Ұިᆃ࠻ ͛ၙĂԧࣇ૟ົ൴னԧࣇͧ̚ޘॡมĄ̙Ϊߏԧࣇዦ᝝႕͛۞ి˯܅ົ˵फ़Ă఺ ҘĄӈֹΪߏ૟ԧࣇሢڌ҂̏གྷۢ྽۞ޥĂࢦາޟкॡมдή̄มᝠᛓଃޝ܅ົ 滿文檔案與新清史 11

זᖙᛌјΩ˘჌͛фĂ༊ԧࣇዦ᝝႕͛۞ॡ࣏Ă఺ಶтТԧࣇௐ˘Ѩ᝝ۏଉ۞ְ ιĄԧࣇ۞ᄮۢԼតĂͷត଀ՀࠎஎˢĄ఺ֱ༊൒ޞҘĂͽ̙Т۞ீЍ࠻ڌ఺ֱ ߏԧࣇጯ௫ዦ᝝႕͛۞ࢦᕇٙдĄ

࠻Ă఺˵ߏࠎ̦ᆃΪϡ႕͛ᑫ९۞͛̚ᖙᛌົ̙଀ࢋᅳĄֽޘଂາ୻Ϋ۞֎ ఺ֱᖙᛌ΍ҋҰҋ̎Ą఺̙ܧϡ႕͛ᑫ९Ăੵֹٺϡᖙᛌ࿅۞႕͛ᑫ९̙֭ඈֹ ΪߏЯࠎᖙᛌΞਕ΍᏾ĂՀߏЯࠎ՟ѣ˘჌ᖙᛌΞͽ็྿ҋ̎Ꮠ֗ዦ᝝ᑫ९ٙ଀ Ҙ͞۞઼̚ΫጯछĂΪֹϡᖙᛌјҘ͞ᄬ֏۞ྤڍ჌ຏᛇĄᓝּ҃֏Ăт֤۞ז ᙱ̙၆ޝफ़Ă̙҃ۡତዦ᝝͛̚Ϋफ़Ăѣኡົԯ΁༊˘аְĉ˵Яࠎ఺ᇹĂԧࣇ ˞͛ᖙᛌ۞႕͛Ϋफ़ѣ჌Ϭ࠼ኑᗔ۞ຏᛇĄ఺჌ᖙᛌ۞ᔌ๕ͅߍ̚ۍૻአ΍ۡ˘ ଀఺ֱᑫ९ٙΒӣ۞ૄώྤפкˠΞͽޝΞநྋ۞ຐ֕ଥश۞ഇ୕Ă҃Тॡ˵ឰ Ą൒҃఺ֱՄफ़ߏᖙᛌ࿅˞۞ְ၁Ă̏གྷឰ΁ࣇεΝ˞ԧࣇٙᄮࠎ౵ࢦࢋ۞ొੈ ࢪϠ࣫ࡎ̝ຏĂ͞۞̚ۏሢଉְٺĂ˵ಶߏ΁ࣇ۞পளຏĄ൒҃ಶߏ఺჌хд̶ ఺ֱᖙᛌᄃ႕͛ࣧІ۞ᇆώٕԨώ˘੓΍ڍĄт۞ځߏາ୻Ϋࡁտٙࢋ൴ଧᄃᙋ ఺ᇹઇĄѣॡ࣏ԧົᛇ଀Ă఺ֱᖙᛌ۞౵௣͌ޝĂ൒҃̂छצĂᔘͧྵΞͽତۍ ѣˠᄮࠎᑫ९̙࿅ߏڍϫ۞ߏĂឰٙѣྍጯ႕͛۞ˠᛇ଀ጯ௫႕͛՟ѣυࢋĄт ၁൑Ϡ׻۞௢᎕۞ྖĂ֤ᆃᖙᛌ၆΁ࣇ҃֏՟̦ᆃ̙၆Ą൒҃ͽԧҋְֱֽ̎˘ Ĉ႕͛͛३۞ᖙᛌĂֶ΁ࣇᖙᛌј႔͛۞ڍޢ۞וᏝޝᄲĂԧԡ̙ҝົຐည˘჌ ΞُĄޝᇴณ҃ؠâՎՎၨ໑˞႕͛ᑫ९۞Ϡ׻˧Ą҃఺၁д

ԧࣇԓڍ႕͛ᑫ९ѣϏֽ۞ྖĂᑕྍߏາ୻Ϋࢋࠎ׎ፉܲĄТᇹгĂтڍт ୕ࢋ౹ౄ˘࣎Ԇፋ۞୻Ϋဦည۞ྖĂ႕͛ᑫ९Ϻ̙Ξٕ৿Ą൑ኢтңĂᑕྍซҖ ೩΍າ᎖҃ࢦࢋ۞યᗟĂ͔ጱ΍ࣧ౹҃ӛ͔ˠ۞።ΫĂͽٺ˧Վ༊ߏĂ࡭˘˭۞ ׎፾প۞ќז΃۞ΫछĂາ୻Ϋѣ׎ќᘥĂ҃ዦ᝝႕͛ᑫ९ՀΞ଀˘˭ڇѩᄲ ᘥĄ

ă୻Ϋࡁտ۞າෛ౎ˬ

ѣ׌࣎ૄώ۞८͕યᗟĈௐ˘Ă႕߷ˠтז၆ԧࣇᒢྋ୻ഈֽᄲĂ̝݈ԧ೩ ၁၆ன΃઼̚ѣңְ۞ڼ఺ᇹ۞јಶĉௐ˟Ă୻ഈள୉௚זңͽ֤ᆃ͌۞ˠ˾྿ ᇆᜩĉ൑ኢѣ՟ѣຍᙊ఺ᇹઇĂາ୻Ϋࡁտд఺ೀѐֽ̏གྷणன˞˘჌າ៍ᕇĂ ˘ӈ૟୻ഈଂ৷ოࠎ˘࣎ॡ΃ึԔ۞ॡ߱ЩჍĂᖼតј˘჌ೡّࢗ۞ෟຉĂ΃ܑ 12 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

Ąனдԧࢋᖎಏгໄࢗ఺࣎៍ᕇĂጐგڼ௚ڼሀёă߆ڼࢲॾă߆ڼ჌পঅ۞߆ ڱι̙ߏΪѣ˘჌ࢬᄻĂԧྏ඾ᕩৼ΍̂࡭۞পᕇĄѩ఍ԧଂԧࣇ၆႕߷۞າ࠻ ᄲ੓Ă఺˵ߏѩາ៍ᕇฟؕ۞г͞Ą

ॡม̚Ă΁ࣇܜ఺߱ႝ۞઼̚اߏĂд႕߷ˠؠڱᖎಏ۞ᄲĂ̝݈೼࿆۞࠻ ᄃ႔ˠ̝ม̙Гѣព඾۞ડז൑ܲ঻гజҫˠ˾кᇴ۞႔ˠٙТ̼Ăۡ҃ి֝ ჟৠ۞ঐεĂͽ̈́ధкၮˠ၆႔ˠ̼͛۞ሤਾĂڠإ࿣Ą႕ᄬֹϡ۞਽ੜă႕߷ Β߁ጯఙăᖃᆇᄃᘹఙඈኜк͞ࢬĂౌజෛࠎߏ႕߷ˠ֕Ш႔̼۞ᙋፂĄ༊୻ഈ Ă఺Т̼۞ซ඀ҋ൒гԛјĶ႕߷ˠ̏ᄃ׎΁ٙѣ۞ˠღ૜ᏉЪд˘੓ķޢඕՁ̝ ࣒ϒֽܕ΁۞γֽ۰Ą൒҃ڇفĂ҃Оᙋ˞˘ήҁྖĈ઼̚ᓁߏΞͽӛৼڍඕ۞ ٚᄮТ̼఺࣎ᔌ๕Ğԧͧྵ้ШֹϡĶ̼͛ķ˵ڱனΩ˘჌ဦညĄᔵ൒఺࠻ڱ࠻۞ acculturation]˘ෟğĂາ୻Ϋᄮࠎ႕߷ˠଂϏεΝ΁ࣇд୻΃ۤົ̚ߏ˘࣎পঅ] ᄲĂ႔ˠ˵Ϗഅᄮࠎ႕߷ˠᄃ΁ࣇҋ̎ԆБ࠹ֽޘĂ҃ͽ႔ˠ۞֎ڱཏវ۞ຐ ႕߷୉ཏᄮТ۞ّኳăͽ̈́тңᒢྋ఺჌ᄮТ̝ॡ΃តዏඈٺТĄᔵ൒ጯ۰ࣇ၆ ຍ֍ϏυБ൒࠹ТĂҭ̂छ۞ВᙊߏĂͽߙֱ͞ёĂડ̶႕႔̝ม۞ࠧቢдፋ࣎ д׎΁͞ࢬ׍ѣӛ͔˧۞நϤڱĂؕ௣ౌхд඾Ą16 ႕႔̶অ۞࠻ޢ୻ഈࠤҌ̝ ˞ߏĂιΞͽྋᛖңͽͅ႕֏ኢд˩˝ᄃ˟˩͵ࡔౌᔘਕтѩѣ˧Ă֭ͷ˵ྋᛖ ңͽ႕୉Ҍ̫̪జᕩࠎ͌ᇴϔ୉Ą

˛˩׌Ѻ઼̱̚ڼ።Ϋ۞࣒ϒ៍ᕇ߄ጼ˞႕߷ˠ̝ٙͽ௚ޢ఺࣎၆႕୻ˢᙯ Ą17 ྫྷ఺࣎ኢᕇ̙ТĂԧ͹ૺ႕߷ˠڱѐĂߏЯࠎ΁ࣇॲώ˯តј˞઼̚ˠ۞ᄲ ٙͽΞͽјΑ͹߆ĂߏЯࠎ΁ࣇ՟ѣតј઼̚ˠĄ఺ߏ޽Ă႕߷ˠϒቁ۞ᄮᙊ̝ ็ڼࣧЯĂ͹ࢋЯࠎ΁ࣇਕૉ˘͞ࢬྻϡ઼̚߆۞ڼĂ΁ࣇΞͽჯ޺͌ᇴ௚ז ௚â͞ࢬ˫Тॡჯ޺׎፾প̝ᄮТĄ18 ᓁវ҃֏Ă఺ᇹ۞ඉரՙؠ˞΁ࣇ֗ࠎ ߏ׎̚۞ޘטྎࢗĞˣၮڱ఺ᇹ۞πᏊдѩԧࣇ൑ז۰۞჌჌ᓝନĄтң྿ڼ௚ Ϳ௟۞ዦ᝝ҋ̎۞።ΫĂ၆׎΁ளޝ႕߷ˠזຍڦࢦࢋొ̶ğĂҭҌ͌ԧࣇᑕྍ ă̮ඈඈĂ˵ౌ̝ۢࠤྎĄܛ୉ͳഈ۞።ΫĂт᏶ă

16 主要可參考三本著作:Pamela Crossley(柯嬌燕), Orphan Warriors and A Translucent Mirror, 及 本文作者,The Manchu Way. 17 為此觀點辯護最力者見:Ping-ti Ho(何炳棣), “In Defense of : A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski’s ‘Reenvisioning the Qing,” 123-55. 18 Mark C. Elliott, The Manchu Way, 3. 滿文檔案與新清史 13

ϻࢭ׻ᄃϔ઼ኚϠ۞˘ֱᇃࠎ֙ٺĂТᇹ˵߄ጼ˞ᙯڱ఺ֱ၆႕߷ˠ۞າ࠻ ᄃ႔ۏˠڼྋᛖĄּтEdward Rhoads͹ૺĂᔵ൒Тᇹણᄃາ߆۞႕୉߆۞צତ ࢦۏˠڼზࢍ˯ჯ޺႕߷۞Ӏৈ̪ߏ႕߷߆ڼӀৈࢦᝑĂҭд߆̶ొۏˠڼ୉߆ ᓝ΍۞ޘטޓࢋ۞҂ณĄ19 ൒҃Ăଂࢦາଣ৶႕͛ᑫ९଀ֽ۞ă၆୻ഈ઼छᄃ࠱ ኜкࢦࢋયᗟĂ၆୻Ϋٕᓁវ۞઼̚Ϋ҃֏ĂٕధຍཌྷՀࠎࢦ̂Ąּтдፋ࣎୻ ܮࣶ̝γĂ႕߷ˠТॡ˵ࢋߏ࣎Ķ႕߷ˠķĂϤѩԧࣇء۰ᄃڼഈĂੵ˞ࢋߏ௚ ഈ۞፾পᇆᜩĄ఺ځٺүĂົѣ̙֍ྻڼᄃ߆ޘטڼ၆୻ഈ۞߆ڼΞ࿰ഇ႕߷௚ ΍ҋధк੅ኢ୻ഈ̚ཧ۞үݡĂ҃Ķ႕߷Я৵ķд఺ֱүݡٙԷႊ۞֎ޘᇹ۞֎ ሀё۞ڼͳഈ۞௚ڇفѣຍᙊ۞ଳϡ̝݈ޓ୻ഈ࠱ڍҒ෸ֽ෸ព඾Ą20 Г۰Ăт ఺ֱ੓໚۞ஶྫĄଂ఺࣎઄నזၹ̚Աޙ઼ޓᑕྍΞд୻ഈ۞࠱ᝋᄃܮĂԧࣇྖ ၹ̝࠱ޙഈ۞ј̶Ă׎ځٺၹ̚Ăѣ̙Тޙ൴னд୻ഈ۞࠱ᝋܮ΍൴Ăາ۞ࡁտ ৩Ԕ۞஄ЪវĄѩ៍ᕇ၆ధкᛉᗟڼᝋΞᄲߏ͔̬ҋ઼̚ᄃֲ߷̰ౙ׌̙࣎Т߆ ਠ˘ܧࡁտࠤѣӄৈĂּт୻ԗ̚ព඾۞ᖟ็Ңିј̶ă୻ഈ۞кᄬன෪ăଂ۞ ચ۞ઐрă၆ҘΔᙝᘟгડ۞ࢦෛᄃགྷᒉĂͽ̈́׎΁Ч჌ᛉְ͞ءϒёგ྽఍ந ᗟĄ21

аـԧࣇڍଣ৶۞ࢦࢋኝᗟĄтޞଂ఺࣎͞Ш࠻Ăາ୻Ϋ̏གྷଯજ˞ధкѣ ă̮ğĂ૟ົᖼតԧࣇܛͳഈĞт᏶ăڇف࠻Ăፋវّгࡁտᄃͧྵ୻ഈᄃ׎΁ ሀё۞៍ᕇĄՀซ˘Վ۞ᄲĂາ୻Ϋ۞៍ᕇڼͽֽͳഈ௚˳ܜΗొڌ၆ለֲ̂ౙ ୻ഈ۞זĂ҃ᇆᜩԧࣇ၆࣫ഈهϺ૟Լតԧࣇ၆Ķ઼̚ķᄃĶ઼̚ˠķ۞ૄώໄ ځĂາ۞៍ᕇ˵૟ᛈજԧࣇՀซ˘ՎΝଣ৶ྺຽ͛ז።ΫؠҜĄԧࣇ˵Ξຐည଀ ԧڍડા۞ͧྵࡁտĄΩ˘͞ࢬĂтྭזϔ୉มΟҁ۞̢જᙯܼĂ͔҃ᅳێᄃഫ ࣇШ݈࠻Ăາ୻Ϋ˵૟ᄃன΃үాඕĄּтĂາ୻Ϋጯ۰̏གྷฟؕ೩΍Ķ୻ഈߏ

19 Edward Rhoads, Manchus and Han Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. Pamela Crossley在其著作A Translucent Mirror的結論之處也探究了 清朝滿族認同與民國政治意識型態之間的關連。 20 Beatrice S. Bartlett, Monarchs and Ministers; Philip Kuhn, Soulstealers; James Polachek, The Inner Opium War; Pierre-Henri Durand, Lettrés et pouvoirs; Norman Kutcher, Mourning in Late Imperial China; Jonathan Spence, Treason by the Book. 21 請參見下述著作:Bartlett, Monarchs and Ministers; Evelyn S. Rawski, The Last Emperors; Patricia Berger, Empire of Emptiness; Peter Perdue, China Marches West; James A. Millward et al., eds., New Qing Imperial History; Pamela Crossley, A Translucent Mirror and “The Rulerships of China,” 1468-83.; Michael Chang, “A Court on Horseback: Constructing Manchu Ethno-Dynastic Rule in China, 1751-1784.” 14 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

ă̂ࡻ઼ޓķ۞યᗟĂ22 ΁ࣇ˵૟୻ഈ၆ᙝหгડ۞߆ඉᄃܻᘲ೻઼ޓӎߏതϔ ͽ̈́׎΁ன΃ѝഇ઼छઇͧྵĂ҃೩΍ԧࣇߏӎΞͽჍ୻ഈࠎ઼ޓăญဦત઼ޓ Ξͽ۞ྖĂ˫ߏдިᇹ۞ຍཌྷ̝˭ĉ23 ୻ഈ۞ڍĶன΃ѝഇķĞearly modernğĂт ࠧ៍ࠎңĉߏӎ׎ᄮᙊ͵ࠧ۞͞ёԛј఺࣎͵ࠧ៍ĉԧࣇߏӎΞдгဦăдᘱ͵ ୻ഈޞ׎͵ࠧ៍ĉ24 д఺̝̚ѣңຍஉĉ఺ᇹ࠻ז᎝ăдγϹ߆ඉ̚࠻ޙ൪ăд ઼̚ޓётңᇆᜩԧࣇ၆ன΃઼̚ϔ୉઼छ۞ᄮᙊĂ͍׎ன΃઼̚ߏଂ̂୻͞۞ ௲ࡩ҃΍ĉଂ఺ᇹ۞ᖼொ࿅඀̚ѣިᇹ۞኏ࡎᄃღૺᙯܼĉ

̚ٺధາ୻Ϋࢋ೩΍ֽ۞౵̂યᗟߏĂԧࣇΞӎ̙གྷኳႷгۡତ૟୻ഈඈ˵ Ă઼่҃̚ߏ׎̚˘ొЊĉొ̶າ઼ޓĉᙱ྽ԧࣇ̙ྍ૟׎ෛࠎߏ˘Ķ႕߷ķ઼ ୻ഈࠎײ୻Ϋ۞ΫछЯѩ้ШдĶ୻ഈķᄃĶ઼̚ķมထ˭˘୧ࠧቢĂᔖҺჍ ĄޓࠎĶ઼̚ķ࠱ޓ୻ഈ࠱ײĶ઼̚ķĂ˵̙Ⴭ

ឰԧࣇՀୂٺѣӄڱĂЯࠎԧᄮࠎ఺ᇹ۞࠻ڱᙒТ఺ᇹ۞࠻˯ޘԧдߙ჌඀ ڼᄃ̚රϔ઼ĞՀ̙ϡᄲᄃ̚රˠϔВ׶઼˞ğߏѣ̙Т߆઼ޓ୻̂זຍڦዟг ˵ពࢦᝑĂ׌۰มځ၁វĄӈֹдˠ˾ᄃгந˯୻ഈᄃன΃઼̚ڼϫᇾ۞̙Т߆ 1930ѐ΃тᜪዯࣣז૜Ъ൑ᓀĂְ҃၁˯ѣధкણम኏ࡎ̝఍Ąଂ1910ă1920ܧ ౹ౄ˘࣎າϔ઼̚ޓഇࢬ၆тңଂ̂୻ܜඈۢᙊЊ̄۞͛ౢ̚Ξͽ࠻΍ֽĂ΁ࣇ ୉઼छ۞ᙱᗟĄ25 ఺̙ߏ˘Іᅅᗫ۞̍үĂԧࣇٕధΞᄲ఺࣎̍үҌ̫ਕϏԆ ഈॡځк͞ࢬ୻ഈౌͧԧࣇ˘ਠᄲ۞઼̚ăٕ۰ͧ੓ԇഈٕޝјĄЯѩĂߊ൒д ˘୻ഈĶ઼̚ķ̝݈А൘Ꮲײ࣏۞઼̚ĂΒӣ۞ࢋк΍ధкĂԧࣇѣநϤдჍ Ąᔵ൒ĂԧٚᄮԧТॡ˵ົፉ͕ԯ఺୧Ķ୻ഈķᄃĶ઼̚ķ̝ม۞ࠧቢ൪۞͉˭ Ăٕ۰ߏВ׶઼Ă઼ޓķĂ൑ኢιߏ࣎ͳ઼ă઼ڱࠎĶ઼ڱពĄலౣԧࣇჍځ࿅ ҋ̎۞ײؠ΃ܑιࣇ̝มυ൒၆Ⴭ࠹ඈĄѩγĂ႕߷ˠѣॡ˵Ⴭ˘̙֭ײ఺჌Ⴭ ఺ᇹ۞ּזᙝᘟг૲Ąԧд႔͛ᄃ႕͛ᑫ९̚ౌԱײࠎĶ઼̚ķĂӈֹߏჍ઼ޓ

22 Nicola Di Cosmo, “Qing Colonial Administration in ,” 287-309. 23 參考Perdue, China Marches West與他的其他文章。 24 James Hevia, Cherishing Men from Afar; Philippe Forêt, Mapping Chengde: The Qing Landscape Enterprise; Laura Hostetler, Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China; Jonathan Hay, Shitao: Painting and Modernity in Early Qing China; Lydia Liu, The Clash of Empires; also useful is the review essay by Joanna Waley-Cohen, “The ,” 193-206. 25 王汎森的研究指出這一點。Wang Fansen, Fu Ssu-nien: A Life in Chinese History and Politics. 滿文檔案與新清史 15

႕͛ᑫ९۞ᆊࣃĄځę఺྆˫ГѨᙋ̄

αăඕāኢ

ώ͛ٙ೩΍۞៍၅̙֭Βӣ͵ࠧ׎΁г͞۞൴ځдઇඕኢ̝݈ĂԧຐАᄲ ᙷҬ۞ޝາ୻Ϋѣ۞זጯఙཏវᄃώ͛ٙ೩۞̚ܜѣ˘ཏјܮणĄּтд͟ώĂ Ą26 ΁ࣇ۞ጯఙஅ໚ᄃለ࡚ጯ۰̙̂࠹ТĂࣃ଀Ω͛૞ኢĄ೩̈́఺ᕇ۞Тڦᙯ ͛ౢ̙֭ߏࢋ͹ૺ႕͛ᑫ९ߏາ୻Ϋࡁտ۞༰㛼Ă۞ޘॡĂԧ˵ࢋᄲ఺ቔѣ׎ࢨ ΁ࣇ۞ሕдᆊࣃĄ࠹ͅ۞Ăͧ੓ొ̶д1930ѐזຍڦߏᄲ઱ѣ઼࡚ጯ۰ฟ̙ؕ˵ ซ̝ዅĄдᄂ៉ᄃ઼̚Ăޢ΃ಶฟؕࡁ੅఺࣎યᗟ۞͟ώ୻Ϋጯ۰ĂԧࣇΪਕߏ ᙱΝෞҤ఺ޝѣ̈ొ̶۞ጯ۰޺ᜈ۞၆ѩ࠹ᙯᛉᗟ೩΍үݡĂ27 Ϊߏ၆ԧֽᄲԧ ѣкૻধĄΪѣд୻΃ᙝᘟΫ఺࣎ᅳાΞڱг͞ѐᅅ˘ዅጯ۰၆႕͛ᑫ९۞࠻ֱ ࢨ۞֍ྋĄ28݀צ̙ྵז࠻΍΁ࣇ၆႕͛ᑫ९۞ࢦෛĂ׎̚ѣॡΞͽ࠻

۞˯д઼࡚ٕ۰˵Ξᄲдለ߷Ă༊΃۞ጯ۰ࢦາෞҤ˞႕͛Ϋफ़дࡁտ୻Ϋ ̏˵ӈֹ̙ߏБొĂֽܕෛ఺ֱՄफ़Ă൒҃نഅགྷޘ˘ࢦࢋّĄጯ۰૞छࣇ࿅Ν ăۤົăགྷڼ୻΃߆ޙğĂдࢦזĞٕ۰ϒฟؕវᄮזགྷѣ࠹༊к۞ጯ۰វᄮ ᑻă̼͛ඈЧ჌̙ТᆸࢬՀԆፋ۞ဦည̚Ă႕͛ᑫ९ٙԷႊ۞ࢦࢋ֎ҒĄᄃ႕͛ ኢᄃநڱᑫ९జࢦາؠҜ۞ТॡĂдҘ઼̚͞Ϋछυؠࢋዎ࿃۞ăࡁտ઼̝̚͞ ᑅԺ۞ᓏࢰăజᔳᖟ۞ୃࢗĂుצኢߛၹ˯ĂϺ൴Ϡ˞ॲώ۞ᖼតĂֹ҃଀̝݈ ႙гঙ΍ᕧࢬĄϒߏ఺׌۵̙Т۞ሗ߹ТॡϹົĂ͔ጱ΍ԧࣇனдٙᄲ۞າ୻Ϋ Ꮈ੓Ą఺׎֭̚՟ѣ̦ᆃߏ۩݈۞ęтТٙѣ۞።Ϋጯछౌజ᛿Ꮾ఺ᇹ۞ໄ۞ ՟ѣ̙ᕝ۞࣒ϒĂ።Ϋಶ̦ᆃౌ̙ߏĂ҃ٙѣᆷ۞р۞።ΫĂдߙ჌඀ڍĈтه Ă࠻࠻ֱࣹଂາ୻Ϋٙ೩΍ֽ۞ኢޞߏ၆А݈።Ϋ۞࣒ϒęԧࣇυืඈౌ˯ޘ ౵р۞ඕԊߏĂѣ˘͇ԧࣇ఺྆۞זᕇΞͽ఼࿅ॡม۞҂រĄ၆ѩĂԧࣇٙਕຐ ΃̝Ą҃פٙᄲ۞າ୻Ϋ૟ົ࿅ॡĂ҃૟ົѣາ۞າ୻Ϋ

26 這群學者包括:岡田英弘、片岡一忠、中見立夫、石橋崇雄、楠木賢道、柳澤明、石濱裕美子、 岡洋樹與杉山清彥。對近來此一趨勢的回顧見Kishimoto Mio岸本美緒,“The Ch’ing Dynasty and the East Asian World,” 87-109. 27 其中劉小萌、定宜莊、楊貞、杜家驥、賴惠敏等人的作品或許是最值得一提的。 28 值得一提的學者有馬大正、程崇德、華立。 16 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

͔ϡ३ϫ

˘ă็௚͛ᚥ ۏ߇झ͛ᚥበᏭ؎ࣶົበĂĮѐᘵಜݶၦ૞ᏭįˬΊĂᄂΔĈ઼ϲ߇झ౾ੰۏϲ߇झ౾઼ ੰĂ1971Ą Ă1977ĄۤۍበįĂᄂΔĈ͛Ϋࣰ΍ܐĂĮ୻΃໤ጧႬΫफ़ڦఄР൴ᛌ

˟ăܕˠኢ඾ ౘଥАĂĮ႕͛୻၁ᐂࡁտįĂᄂΔĈ̼̂३ԊĂ1978Ą ͛३ԊĂ1981ĄځౘଥАĂĮ႕͛୻ώࡔࡁտįĂᄂΔĈ Ĉ̳̚າ३Ă1979Ąִڌの͘৽įĂޓϣࡻσĂĮ૵Ⴇت ߶͛ऱĂ1972ĄڌĈִڌඈበĂĮ័ࡓၮą࿥ϒഈįĂ͈ܫৠϣ Bartlett, Beatrice S. “Books of Revelations: The Importance of the Manchu Language Archival Record Books for Research on Ch’ing History,” Late Imperial China 6.2 (December 1985): 25-36. ǕǕǕ. Monarchs and Ministers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991. Berger, Patricia. Empire of Emptiness. Honolulu: University of Press, 2003. Chang, Michael. “A Court on Horseback: Constructing Manchu Ethno-Dynastic Rule in China, 1751-1784,” PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 2001. Cohen, Paul. Discovering History in China, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984. Cosmo, Nicola Di. “Qing Colonial Administration in Inner Asia,” International History Review 20.2 (June 1998): 287-309. Crossley, Pamela (ߟᆲ፷). Orphan Warriors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. ǕǕǕ. A Translucent Mirror and “The Rulerships of China,” American Historical Review 97.5 (December 1992): 1468-83. ǕǕǕ. A Translucent Mirror. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. Durand, Pierre-Henri. Lettrés et pouvoirs. Paris: EHESS, 1992. Elliott, Mark C. and James Bosson. “Highlights of the Manchu-Mongolian Collection,” in Patrick Hanan, ed., Treasures of the Yenching, Cambridge: Harvard-Yenching Library, 2003, 79- 122. Elliott, Mark C.. The Manchu Way. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. ǕǕǕ. The Manchu-Language Archives of the Qing Dynasty and the Origins of the Palace Memorial System,” Late Imperial China 22.1 (June 2001): 1-70. 滿文檔案與新清史 17

Farquhar, Judith and James Hevia. “Culture and Post-war American Historiography of China,” Positions 1.2 (1993): 486-525. Fletcher, Joseph F. “Review of Walter Simon and Howard G.H. Nelson, Manchu Books in London: A Union Catalogue,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 41.2 (December 1981): 653-663. Forêt, Philippe. Mapping Chengde: The Qing Landscape Enterprise. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000. Hay, Jonathan. Shitao: Painting and Modernity in Early Qing China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Hevia, James. Cherishing Men from Afar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995. Ho, Ping-ti. “In Defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski’s ‘Reenvisioning the Qing,” Journal of Asian Studies 57.1 (February 1998): 123-55. Hostetler, Laura. Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. Ko, Dorothy. Teachers of the Inner Chambers. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994. Kuhn, Philip. Soulstealers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. Kutcher, Norman. Mourning in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Liu, Lydia. The Clash of Empires. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. Millward, James A. et al., eds. New Qing Imperial History. New York: Routledge, 2004. ǕǕǕ. Beyond the Pass. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998. ώ࡚ჰ). “The Ch’ing Dynasty and the East Asian World,” Acta Asiatica 88ث) Mio, Kishimoto (2005): 87-109. Perdue, Peter. China Marches West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005. Polachek, James. The Inner Opium War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Council on East Asian Studies, 1992. Rawski, Evelyn S.. The Last Emperors. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988. Rhoads, Edward. Manchus and Han Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000. Saussy, Haun. Great Walls of Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001. Spence, Jonathan. Treason by the Book. New York: Viking, 2001. 18 故宮學術季刊 第二十四卷第二期

Spence, Joseph F. “Manchu Sources,” in Donald Leslie et al., eds., Essays on the Sources for Chinese History, Canberra: ANU Press, 1973, 141-146. Waley-Cohen, Joanna. “The New Qing History,” Radical History Review 88 (Winter 2004): 193- 206. Wang, Fansen (ͳѶ഑). Fu Ssu-nien: A Life in Chinese History and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.