DOCSLIB.ORG

ABC Bdcheegf Out1 Out2 A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ABC Bdcheegf Out1 Out2 A IB 168: Systematics of Vascular Plants Spring 2006 Key concepts -- Lecture 3 (1/25/06; end of Phylogenetics/Lycophytes) Conclusion of phylogenetic concepts Not all shared characteristics are informative about phylogenetic relationships Hennig (1966): Shared, derived character-states are useful for resolving phylogeny, but shared, ancestral characteristics are not. Apomorphy (= apomorphic character-state): A derived state (either shared or unique). Autapomorphy: A unique, derived state; diagnostic for a terminal taxon but not informative about its relationships to other taxa. Synapomorphy: A shared, derived state; diagnostic of phylogenetic relationships. Synapomorphies are the basis for resolving monophyletic groups. Plesiomorphy: An ancestral state. Symplesiomorphy: A shared, ancestral state; not diagnostic of relationships. Symplesiomorphic similarities often have been the basis for recognition of paraphyletic groups. out1 out2 A B C 1 g 0 j 1 f i 1 e 0 e c 1 ? 0 0 h a d 1 ? 0 b 1 0 In the tree above, character state 1 of char. B is synapomorphic for clade A+B+C but symplesiomorphic for clade B+C. Similarly, char. state 1 of char. h is synapomorphic for clade B+C but plesiomorphic for taxon B. Char.-state 1 of char. j is autapomorphic for taxon C, as is char. state 1 of char. g for taxon A. Possession of the same character-state by different taxa may be attributable to common ancestry of those taxa or independent evolution of the character-state Homology (in systematic sense): Similarity due to common ancestry; a homologous characteristic is one that was passed along to different groups from their common ancestor (both synapomorphies and symplesiomorphies represent homologous characteristics). For example, char. state 1 of character b in the above tree is homologous in taxa A, B, and C, as is presence of char. state 0 of character h in out2 and A (even though symplesiomorphic). Homoplasy: Similarity due to independent evolution; a homoplastic or homoplasious characteristic is misleading about relationship, even if it has the same genetic basis in groups where it evolved independently. Homoplastic characteristics include those that arise as evolutionary parallelisms or reversals. For example, presence of char. state 1 in character e in both taxa A and C in the tree on the previous page is an example of homoplasy. _______________________________________________________________________ Early vascular-plant evolution Phylogenetic data have demonstrated that the sporophyte-dominant, tracheophyte life- cycle evolved from a gametophyte-dominant life-cycle. We know this based on two lines of evidence: (1) Paraphyly of "bryophytes" (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) and (2) recognition that the earliest tracheophytes (Rhyniophytes, now extinct) had sporophyte and gametophyte generations that appeared similar morphologically. The grade of "bryophyte" lineages below the base of the tracheophytes illustrates that gametophyte- dominance came first; Rhyniophyte fossils suggest that the two phases of the life cycle were co-dominant prior to the transition to sporophyte dominance in early tracheophyte evolution. Modern tracheophytes "Bryophytes" (vascular plants) Rhyniophytes sporophyte dominant; tracheids arise sporophyte/gametophyte share dominance alternation of generations/ gametophyte dominant Why sporophyte dominance? Many possible reasons, for example, (1) benefits of masking deleterious mutations in the diploid (sporophyte) phase; (2) truncation of gametophyte generation, with the vulnerabilities of requiring a medium for free- swimming sperm. Tracheophyte phylogeny consists of three principal branches: 1) Lycophytes: earlier thought to be "fern allies" but ferns are more closely related to seed plants than to Lycophytes. 2) Ferns, including two families (Equisetaceae and Psilotaceae) that until recently were thought to fall well outside the fern lineage. 3) Seed plants: monophyletic -- all modern seed plants from one origin of seed. All three major lineages of tracheophytes have evolved *heterospory (see below) independently: Lycophytes (heterospory probably evolved once in common ancestor of Selaginellaceae and Isoëtaceae, after branching off of Lycopodiaceae, which is homosporous). Ferns (heterospory evolved in common ancestor of two families of water ferns -- Marsileaceae and Salviniaceae; all other ferns are homosporous). Seed plants (all are heterosporous; heterospory had to evolved prior to origin of the seed, as will be discussed in lecture on origin of seed plants). *Heterospory: Production of two different kinds of spores (megaspores & microspores; each from different sporangia -- megasporangia and microsporangia) by the sporophyte; each type of spore matures into a unisexual gametophyte, either male or female. In contrast, spores of homosporous plants mature to be bisexual gametophytes, with both male and female gametangia. Sporophyte Microsporangia Embryo Megasporangia Diploid (2n) fertilization (zygote formed)---------------------------------------------meiosis---------- Haploid (2n) eggs Megaspores Microspores archegonia sperm Megagametophyte antheridia Microgametophyte Why heterospory? Unclear. Some have suggested selection for outcrossing, although homosporous plants have mechanisms to promote outcrossing. Heterospory is associated with reduction and protection of the gametophyte phase, which develops inside the protective spore-wall. Lycophytes - An ancient lineage dating from the Devonian (>400 million years ago) and sister-group of other living tracheophytes. Today, moss-like or onion-like plants; prehistorically, included dominant trees of swamp forests of the Paleozoic (e.g., Lepidodendron). Diagnostic (synapomorphic) features of Lycophytes: (1) microphylls (leaves with single strand of unbranched conducting tissue); (2) kidney- shaped sporangia that open transversely at maturity; (3) sporangia produced in microphyll axils (just above leaves; sometimes sporophylls (= leaves associated with sporangia) arrayed in cones (= strobili). Lycophytes (ca. 1200 spp.) Isoetaceae Selaginellaceae Lycopodiaceae (Lepidodendrales) Seed plants Ferns (ca. 12,500 spp.) >270,000 spp. (Pteridophytes) 2ndary xylem microphylls heterostyly; axillary kidney-shaped ligule sporangia transverse dehiscence of sporangia Other (plesiomorphic) features of Lycophytes (all five features below resolved as present in the most recent common ancestor of all living tracheophytes): (1) sporangia are eusporangia (sporangial outer wall > 1 cell layer thick); (2) spores globose with trilete scar; (3) free-living gametophytes (above or below ground), not attached to sporophyte at maturity; (4) stems dichotomously branching; (5) sperm with 2 flagellae (sperm of ferns and those seed plants with motile sperm have numerous flagellae). Three extant families of Lycophytes (ca. 1,200 species): (1) Lycopodiaceae: "Club mosses" -- homosporous, without ligules, with underground gametophyte; worldwide, rhizomatous moss-like plants, often in forest understories. (2) Selaginellaceae: "Spike mosses" -- heterosporous, with ligules (scale-like outgrowth near base of each microphyll); mostly tropical but includes "resurrection plants" of dry areas (can dehydrate and rapidly rehydrate and resume photosynthesis); moss-like in appearance, sometimes grow on (but do not parasitize) other plants (that is, are often epiphytes). (3) Isoëtaceae: "Quillworts" -- heterosporous, with ligules, sporangia embedded in leaf base; onion-like appearance; associated with water (often along edges of lakes, ponds). Lepidodendron and other ancient (extinct) tree lycophytes were heterosporous, with ligules, and therefore thought to be closely related to Selaginellaceae and Isoëtaceae. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tansley Review Evolution of Development of Vascular Cambia and Secondary Growth
    New Phytologist Review Tansley review Evolution of development of vascular cambia and secondary growth Author for correspondence: Rachel Spicer1 and Andrew Groover2 Andrew Groover 1The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; 2Institute of Forest Genetics, Pacific Tel: +1 530 759 1738 Email: [email protected] Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Davis, CA, USA Received: 29 December 2009 Accepted: 14 February 2010 Contents Summary 577 V. Evolution of development approaches for the study 587 of secondary vascular growth I. Introduction 577 VI. Conclusions 589 II. Generalized function of vascular cambia and their 578 developmental and evolutionary origins Acknowledgements 589 III. Variation in secondary vascular growth in angiosperms 581 References 589 IV. Genes and mechanisms regulating secondary vascular 584 growth and their evolutionary origins Summary New Phytologist (2010) 186: 577–592 Secondary growth from vascular cambia results in radial, woody growth of stems. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03236.x The innovation of secondary vascular development during plant evolution allowed the production of novel plant forms ranging from massive forest trees to flexible, Key words: forest trees, genomics, Populus, woody lianas. We present examples of the extensive phylogenetic variation in sec- wood anatomy, wood formation. ondary vascular growth and discuss current knowledge of genes that regulate the development of vascular cambia and woody tissues. From these foundations, we propose strategies for genomics-based research in the evolution of development, which is a next logical step in the study of secondary growth. I. Introduction this pattern characterizes most extant forest trees, significant variation exists among taxa, ranging from extinct woody Secondary vascular growth provides a means of radially lycopods and horsetails with unifacial cambia (Cichan & thickening and strengthening plant axes initiated during Taylor, 1990; Willis & McElwain, 2002), to angiosperms primary, or apical growth.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterospory and Seed Habit Heterospory Is a Phenomenon in Which Two Kinds of Spores Are Borne by the Same Plant
    Biology and Diversity of Algae, Bryophyta and Pteridophytes Paper Code: BOT-502 BLOCK – IV: PTERIDOPHYTA Unit –19: Hetrospory and Seed Habit Unit–20: Fossil Pteridophytes By Dr. Prabha Dhondiyal Department of Botany Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani E-mail: [email protected] Contents ❑ Introduction to Heterospory ❑ Origin of Heterospory ❑ Significance of Heterospory ❑ General accounts of Fossil pteridophytes ❑ Fossil Lycopsids ❑ Fossil Sphenophytes ❑ Fossil Pteridopsis ❑Glossary ❑Assessment Questions ❑Suggested Readings Heterospory and Seed habit Heterospory is a phenomenon in which two kinds of spores are borne by the same plant. The spores differ in size, structure and function. The smaller one is known as microspore and larger one is known as megaspore. Such Pteridophytes are known as heterosporous and the phenomenon is known as heterospory. Most of the Pteridophytes produce one kind of similar spores, Such Peridophytes are known as homosporous and this phenomenon is known as homospory. The sporangia show greater specialization. They are differentiated into micro and megasporangia. The microsporangia contaion microspores whereas megasporangia contain megaspores. The production of two types of sproes with different sexuality was first evolved in pteridophytes. Even though, the condition of heterospory is now represented only by eight living species of pteridophytes, they are Selaginella, Isoetes, Marsilea, Salvinia, Azolla, Regnellidium, Pilularia and Stylites. Origin of heterospory The fossil and developmental studies explain about the origin of heterospory. A number of fossil records proved that heterospory existed in many genera of Lycopsida, Sphenopsida and Pteropsida. They are very common in late Devonian and early Carboniferous periods. During this period the important heterosporous Licopsids genera were Lepidocarpon, Lepidodemdron, Lipidostrobus, Pleoromea, Sigilariosrobus etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 4 Integrative Biology 168: Spring 2009 Lycophytes
    Key concepts -- Lecture 4 Integrative Biology 168: Spring 2009 Lycophytes - An ancient lineage dating from the Devonian (>400 million years ago) and sister-group of other living tracheophytes. Today, moss-like or onion-like plants; prehistorically, included dominant trees of swamp forests of the Paleozoic (e.g., Lepidodendron). Diagnostic (synapomorphic) features of Lycophytes: (1) microphylls (leaves with single strand of unbranched conducting tissue); (2) kidney- shaped sporangia that open transversely at maturity; (3) sporangia produced in microphyll axils (just above leaves; sometimes sporophylls (= leaves associated with sporangia) arrayed in cones (= strobili). Lycophytes (ca. 1200 spp.) Selaginellaceae Isoetaceae Lycopodiaceae (Lepidodendrales) Seed plants Ferns (ca. 12,500 spp.) >270,000 spp. (Pteridophytes) 2ndary xylem microphylls heterostyly; axillary kidney-shaped ligule sporangia transverse dehiscence of sporangia Other (plesiomorphic) features of Lycophytes (all five features below resolved as present in the most recent common ancestor of all living tracheophytes): (1) sporangia are eusporangia (sporangial outer wall > 1 cell layer thick); (2) spores globose with trilete scar; (3) free-living gametophytes (above or below ground), not attached to sporophyte at maturity; (4) stems dichotomously branching; (5) sperm with 2 flagellae (sperm of ferns and those seed plants with motile sperm have numerous flagellae). Three extant families of Lycophytes (ca. 1,200 species): (1) Lycopodiaceae: "Club mosses" -- homosporous, without ligules, with underground gametophyte; worldwide, rhizomatous moss-like plants, often in forest understories. (2) Selaginellaceae: "Spike mosses" -- heterosporous, with ligules (scale-like outgrowth near base of each microphyll); mostly tropical but includes "resurrection plants" of dry areas (can dehydrate and rapidly rehydrate and resume photosynthesis); moss-like in appearance, sometimes grow on (but do not parasitize) other plants (that is, are often epiphytes).
    [Show full text]
  • Lycophytes-1St-Semester
    Structural Botany Class Lycopsida Archana Dutta Study material for M.Sc Botany First semester Assistant Professor(Guest Faculty) Dept. of Botany, MLT College, Saharsa [email protected] Mob No. - 9065558829 5th May, 2020 _______________________________________________________________________ ___ Members of the Lycopsida have true stems, leaves and (usually) roots. Their sporangia are borne on the adaxial surface of (or in the axils of) sporophylls, and they may or may not resemble the vegetative leaves. In the Alycopods@branch gaps are present in the stele, but no leaf gaps occur in the xylem. Therefore, when the stele has parenchyma at the center, it is a medullated protostele. The leaves (with only one or two exceptions) have a single vascular strand and appear to have arisen phylogenetically from superficial emergences or enations. The extant orders of Lycopsida are: Lycopodiales, Selaginellales, and Isoetales. Fossil orders sometimes include the Protolepidodendrales, Lepidodendrales, and Pleuromeiales. However, in this course the Protolepidodendrales are included in the Lycopodiales, and both the Lepidodendrales and Pleuromeiales are included in the Isoetales. A comprehensive evaluation of lycophytes was published in the Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden in 1992 (Vol. 79: 447-736), and the included papers still reflect current knowledge of the group. Order Lycopodiales Lycopodiales are homosporous, herbaceous, eligulate, isophyllous, and they have true roots. Traditionally, approximately 400 species of two extant genera have been recognized and assigned to the family Lycopodiaceae. More recently, however, (Lycopodium ) has been subdivided such that seven or more genera and three families are now recognized. Classifications are as follows (from Wagner and Beitel, 1992). For the purposes of (examinations in) this course we will recognize only three genera (Lycopodium, Huperzia and Diphasiastrum).
    [Show full text]
  • Megaphylls, Microphylls and the Evolution of Leaf Development
    Opinion Megaphylls, microphylls and the evolution of leaf development Alexandru M.F. Tomescu Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA Originally coined to emphasize morphological differ- However, the microphyll–megaphyll divide is not as ences, ‘microphyll’ and ‘megaphyll’ became synon- clear cut, and morphological definitions that contrast ymous with the idea that vascular plant leaves are not microphylls and megaphylls as mutually exclusive con- homologous. Although it is now accepted that leaves cepts of leaves are inconsistent. Moreover, current under- evolved independently in several euphyllophyte standing of plant phylogeny and leaf development fails to lineages, ‘megaphyll’ has grown to reflect another type shed light on the origin of microphylls, and supports of homology, that of euphyllophyte leaf precursor struc- several independent origins of megaphylls. Here, I review tures. However, evidence from the fossil record and plant phylogeny and developmental data from fossil and developmental pathways fails to indicate homology extant trachephytes, as well as the current understanding and suggests homoplasy of precursor structures. Thus, of genetic pathways controlling leaf development, to argue as I discuss here, ‘megaphyll’ should be abandoned that the megaphyll concept should be abandoned because because it perpetuates an unsupported idea of it perpetuates misconceptions and confusion based on homology, leading to misconceptions that pervade plant unsupported homology. biology thinking and can bias hypothesis and inference in developmental and phylogenetic studies. Alternative Morphological inconsistencies and overlap in the definitions are needed that are based on development microphyll–megaphyll dichotomy and phylogeny for different independently evolved leaf Microphylls are defined as leaves of small size, with simple types.
    [Show full text]
  • Arborescent Lycopsid Productivity and Lifespan: Constraining the Possibilities
    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 227 (2016) 97–110 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Arborescent lycopsid productivity and lifespan: Constraining the possibilities C. Kevin Boyce a,⁎, William A. DiMichele b a Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA b Department of Paleobiology, NMNH Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA article info abstract Article history: One of the most enigmatic components of early terrestrial vegetation was the arborescent lycopsids. Because of Received 25 March 2015 the sheer abundance of their biomass in many wetland environments of the Late Paleozoic, they may have been Received in revised form 22 September 2015 an important variable in the global carbon cycle and climate. However, their unusual structure has invited ex- Accepted 9 October 2015 traordinary interpretations regarding their biology. One idea that has persisted in the literature for over forty Available online 9 November 2015 years is that these trees had extremely short lifespans, on the order of ten years. Such an accelerated lifecycle Keywords: would require growth rates twenty times higher than modern angiosperm trees (and at least 60 times higher — Carboniferous than modern lycopsids). Here, we evaluate the morphology and anatomy of lycopsid trees including aerenchy- Lepidodendron ma, phloem, leaf base distributions, leaf structure, rootlet anatomy, and the demography of the preserved Lepidophloios fossils—with comparison to modern plants with some similarity of overall form, most notably the palms. The en- Oldest palm vironmental context of lycopsid trees also is considered in the light of the vegetation of modern water-saturated Sigillaria substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of Science in Botany
    St. Albert’s College (Autonomous) M.Sc. Botany Syllabus 2019 Master of Science in Botany PROGRAMME STRUCTURE AND SYLLABUS 2019-20 ADMISSIONS ONWARDS BOARD OF STUDIES IN BOTANY (PG) ST.ALBERT’S COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS), ERNAKULAM (AFFILIATED TO MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM) (2019) Department of Botany Page 1 St. Albert’s College (Autonomous) M.Sc. Botany Syllabus 2019 SYLLABUS FOR POST-GRADUATE PROGRAME IN BOTANY (Biotechnology as Program Elective Subject) THE RESTRUCTURED CURRICULUM IN CREDIT SEMESTER SYSTEM (EFFECTIVE FROM 2019 ADMISSIONS) Department of Botany Page 2 St. Albert’s College (Autonomous) M.Sc. Botany Syllabus 2019 DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY, ST.ALBERT’S COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM Board of Studies in Botany (PG) Sl.No: Name Designation Qualification 1/1 Dr .J. Jameson, (Chairman) (HOD) Associate Professor Ph. D a) Entire faculty of each specialization 2. Dr. L. Jose Associate Professor, SACA Ph.D 3. Dr. Siju M. Varghese Assistant Professor, SACA Ph.D 4. Dr. K. Madhusudhanan Assistant Professor, SACA M. Phil., Ph.D. 5. Smt. Drishya K Reghuvaran Assistant Professor, SACA M.Sc 6. Smt. Mary Joseph Assistant Professor, SACA M.Sc 7. Dr. Anna Ancy Antony A Assistant Professor,SACA Ph.D 8. Dr. Anisha S Assistant Professor, SACA Ph.D b) Experts in the Subject: (two) Assistant Professor, Dept of Botany,Kerala 1. Dr Cyril E A Ph.D University. Associate Professor, Dept of Botany, Calicut 2. Dr. Jose Puthoor Ph.D University. c) Nominee of Vice Chancellor (one) Dr. Jomy Augustine HOD and Associate Professor, St. Thomas 1. Ph.D College, Pala. d) Placement Representative. MD, National Sri. Jose .P Corporate Sector (Garden & Nursery) nursery, Trichur.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary-Developmental Change in the Growth Architecture of Fossil Rhizomorphic Lycopsids: Scenarios Constructed on Cladistic Foundations
    527 EVOLUTIONARY-DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGE IN THE GROWTH ARCHITECTURE OF FOSSIL RHIZOMORPHIC LYCOPSIDS: SCENARIOS CONSTRUCTED ON CLADISTIC FOUNDATIONS BY RICHARD M. BATEMAN Departments of Earth and Plant Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, 0x13PR (Present addresses :Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, and Department of Geology, Royal Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, EHi IJF) (Received 3 I March 1993; Accepted 22 March 1994) CONTENTS I. Introduction .......... ..... 528 11. Cladistic analysis .............. 530 (I) Selection of operational taxonomic units ......... 530 (2) Selection of characters and partitioning into character states ..... 531 (3) Polarization of characters. ...... ..... 532 (4) The data matrix ........ ..... 533 (5) Parsimony analysis and optimization .... ..... 535 (6) Experimentation and the preferred most-parsimonious tree ..... 535 111. Growth architecture and ontogeny : general ......... 536 (I) Phylogenetic context of the rhizomorphic lycopsids ...... 536 (2) Architecture, ontogeny and physiology inferred from anatomy .... 539 IV. Growth architecture and ontogeny: specific cases ........ 544 (I) Growth modules and architectures .......... 5 44 (2) Architectures and specific ontogenetic trajectories ....... 546 V. Evolutionary-developmental change: pattern. ........ 55 I (I) Terms and concepts ............ 55' (2) Selected comparisons: ancestor-descendant pairs ....... 555 (3) Selected comparisons: cladistic triplets ......... 559 (4) Overview. .............
    [Show full text]
  • Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms and Paleobotany)
    PLANT DIVERSITY-II (PTERIDOPHYTES, GYMNOSPERMS AND PALEOBOTANY) UNIT I: PTERIDOPHYTES General characters, Reimer’s classification (1954). Telome concept. Sporangium development – Eusporangiate type and Leptosporangiate type. Apogamy, Apospory, Heterospory and Seed habit. Detailed account on stellar evolution. UNIT II: Brief account of the morphology, structure and reproduction of the major groups- Psilophytopsida, Psilotopsida, Lycopsida, Sphenopsida and Pteropsida. (Individual type stydy is not necessary). Economic importance of Gymnoperms. UNIT III: GYMNOSPERMS General characters – Classification of Gymnosperms (Sporne, 1965), Orgin and Phylogeny of Gymnosperms, Gymnosperms compared with Pteridophytes and Angiosperms- Economic Importance of Gymnosperms. UNIT IV: A general account of distribution, morphology, anatomy, reproduction and life cycle of the following major groups – Cycadopsida (Pteridospermales, Bennettitales, Pentaxylales, Cycadales) Coniferopsida (Cordaitales, Coniferales, Ginkgoales) and Gnetopsida (Gneales). UNIT V: PALEOBOTANY Concept of Paleobotany= Geological time scale- Fossil- Fossilization- Compressions, Incrustation, Casts, Molds, Petrifactions, Compactions and Caol balls. Detailed study of the fossil forms- Pteridophytes: Lepidodendron, Calamites. Gymnosperms: Lyginopteris, Cordaites. Role of fossil in oil exploration and coa excavation, Paleopaynology. Prepared by: Unit I and II 1. Dr. A.Pauline Fathima Mary, Guest Lecturer in Botany K. N. Govt. Arts College(W), Auto., Thanjavur. Unit III and IV 1. Dr. S.Gandhimathi, Guest Lecturer in Botany, K. N. Govt. Arts College(W), Auto., Thanjavur. Unit V: 1. Dr. G.Santhi, Head and Assistant professor of Botany, K. N. Govt. Arts College(W), Auto., Thanjavur. Reference: 1. Rashid, A, (2007), An Introduction to Peridophytes- Vikas Publications, New Delhi. 2. Sporne, K.R. (1975). The Morphology of Pteridophytes, London. 3. Coultar, J. M. and Chamberin, C, J. (1976). Morphology of Gymnosperms.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Plant Basics
    Some Plant Basics Introduction to plant physiology and reproduction Plant Kingdom Plant Ecology • The forest floor is often blanketed with decaying leaves, twigs, fallen trees, animal scat, moss, and other detritus. The forest floor is where recycling occurs, fungi, insects, bacteria, and earthworms are among the many organisms that break down waste materials and ready them for reuse and recycling throughout the forest system. • The herb layer of the forest is dominated by herbaceous (or soft-stemmed) plants such as grasses, ferns, wildflowers, and other ground cover. Vegetation in the herb layer often gets little light and in forests with thick canopies, shade tolerant species are predominant in the herb layer. • The shrub layer is characterized by woody vegetation that grows relatively close to the ground. Bushes and brambles grown where enough light passes through the canopy to support shrub growth. • The understory of a forest consists of immature trees and small trees that are shorter than the main canopy level of the tree. Understory trees provide shelter for a wide range of animals. When gaps form in the canopy, often times understory trees take advantage of the opening and grow to fill in the canopy. • The canopy is the layer where the crowns of most of the forest's trees meet and form a thick layer. • Emergents are trees whose crowns emerge above the rest of the canopy. Source Plant Kingdom Plant Ecology Plant Kingdom Plant Kingdom Plant Kingdom Plant Kingdom Plant Kingdom Plant Kingdom Plant Kingdom Non-Tracheophytes •Bacteria
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Carboniferous Tropical Forests: New Views of Plant Function and Potential for Physiological Forcing of Climate
    Review Tansley review Dynamic Carboniferous tropical forests: new views of plant function and potential for physiological forcing of climate Authors for correspondence: Jonathan P. Wilson1*, Isabel P. Montanez~ 2*, Joseph D. White3, Jonathan P. Wilson William A. DiMichele4, Jennifer C. McElwain5, Christopher J. Poulsen6 and Tel: +1 610 896 4217 7 Email: [email protected] Michael T. Hren 1Department of Biology, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041, USA; 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Isabel P. Montanez~ Tel: +1 530 754 7823 California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; 3Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA; 4Department of Paleobiology, Email: [email protected] Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560, USA; 5Earth Institute, School of Biology and Environmental Received: 13 March 2017 Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; 6Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Accepted: 22 May 2017 Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; 7Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA Contents Summary 1333 VI. The big picture: an active role for early forests In Late Paleozoic climate 1347 I. Introduction 1334 Acknowledgements 1348 II. Plants of the Pennsylvanian Tropical Realm 1335 Author contributions 1348 III. Conceptual insights into paleoecophysiology 1339 References 1348 IV. High-productivity Carboniferous plants 1344 V. Lessons learned 1347 Summary New Phytologist (2017) 215: 1333–1353 The Carboniferous, the time of Earth’s penultimate icehouse and widespread coal formation, doi: 10.1111/nph.14700 was dominated by extinct lineages of early-diverging vascular plants. Studies of nearest living relatives of key Carboniferous plants suggest that their physiologies and growth forms differed Key words: Carboniferous, medullosans, substantially from most types of modern vegetation, particularly forests.
    [Show full text]