DOCSLIB.ORG

LAWRENCE EAST Stouffville Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LAWRENCE EAST Stouffville Corridor RER New Stations Initial Business Case LAWRENCE EAST Stouffville Corridor July 2016 Draft Draft: v1.2 Metrolinx Client ref: 150400 RER New Stations Initial Business Case LAWRENCE EAST Draft Prepared by: Prepared for: Urban Strategies Inc. Metrolinx 197 Spadina Avenue, Suite 600 97 Front Street West Toronto, ON Canada M5T 2C8 Toronto, ON M5J 1E6 RER New Stations Initial Business Case June 2016 Note to the reader: The Initial Business Case (IBC) represents a primary input into the evaluation and recommendation of New Stations. Final recommendation of new station site selection considers, in addition to the four cases of the IBC, network fit, and other strategic considerations including priorities of the various levels of government. Network fit addresses system-wide issues and impact on the overall performance of the rail corridor. IBC results do not represent the final recommendations of the GO RER New Stations Evaluation process. IBC results inform the process outlined in the GO RER New Stations Summary and Ranking Report, which is to be posted in the near future. For more information visit: http://www.metrolinx.com/en/regionalplanning/newstations/ The final list of recommended stations is included in the June 28, 2016 GO Regional Express Rail Update report to Metrolinx Board of Directors. 97 Front Street West 97, rue Front Ouest Toronto, Ontario M5J 1E6 Toronto (Ontario) M5J 1E6 RER New Stations Initial Business Case: Lawrence East – draft Executive Summary This Initial Business Case (IBC) examines the potential for a new GO station, Lawrence East, along the GO Stouffville line. The station is conceived as a single island platform accessible from both sides of the rail corridor via pedestrian tunnels. Direct platform access from the Lawrence Avenue East road overpass would also be provided via stairs and elevators. This station would occupy the site of the existing Lawrence East Scarborough RT [SRT] station planned for removal, and would serve an industrial neighbourhood now experiencing some new high-density residential development. Key findings of this IBC for Lawrence East include: Strategic Case: Despite having the potential to replace transit service for residents that would be lost with the removal of the SRT, the station could result in a net ridership loss on the Stouffville line (of approximately 500 daily riders) as some passengers are deterred by increased travel times. While municipal policy targets the station area for growth, employment densities, population densities, and real estate market demand in the immediate area are all predicted to remain low. However, there is an opportunity to work with Toronto and landowners to encourage comprehensive and aggressive transit- oriented development. The station area density is supportive of regional rail service but not express rail service. Financial Case: The construction and operation of the new station at Lawrence East would generate a negative net present value (NPV) of –$78.5 million over a 60-year time horizon. This negative NPV combines capital expenditures and recurring station and train operating costs, estimated at $45.8 million, as well as a loss in fare revenue of $32.7 million resulting from lost ridership. Economic Case: The new station will attract some new riders to the GO network, but these gains may be offset by a loss in upstream riders (deterred by the time required to stop at a new station) and an overall increase in travel time, as well as behavioural changes resulting in increased private automobile use. Lawrence East’s transportation user and environmental impacts amount to a net cost of $325.6 million over the station’s 60-year evaluation period, with capital and operating costs for the new station estimated at an additional $41.8 million. This yields an overall loss of –$367.4 million in Net Present Value. Deliverability and Operations: Station construction would be moderately complex, requiring the removal of existing SRT infrastructure and approximately 900 metres (m) of track realignment. Some private property acquisitions would also be required. Future facility expansion may be possible with additional property acquisition. The station concept would require significant modification if a third (express) track was planned for this section of the rail corridor. The assessment of Lawrence East’s potential concludes that the station performs moderately well in the Deliverability and Operations Case, marginally in the Strategic Case, and poorly in the Financial and Economic Cases. Lawrence East would be complex to construct in the context of SRT infrastructure and may result in a loss of GO ridership, a negative net present value, and broader societal costs arising from increased automobile use. A table summarizing key metrics from each of the four cases follows. A legend is contained in Appendix D. RER New Stations Initial Business Case: Lawrence East – draft Table ES-1: Results of Initial Business Case Analysis for Lawrence East Criterion Summary Policy Alignment Supportive Development Potential and Intensification Neutral Real Estate Market Demand Not Supportive Natural Environment Neutral Operational System Neutral Connectivity and Ridership Drivers Not Supportive Strategic Case Station Access Supportive Social Inclusivity and Accessibility Neutral Incremental GO Ridership (Millions of Trips) –12.8 Fare Revenue (A) –$32.7 Total Costs (B) $45.8 Capital Costs $22.7 Operating Costs (C) $22.6 Net Present Value (A-B) –$78.5 Financial Case Revenue to Cost Ratio (A/B) all-loss Operating Cost Recovery Ratio (A/C) all-loss Travel Time Savings (Millions of Person-Hours) –37.6 Auto Distances Saved (Millions of VKTs) –181.7 Benefits –$325.6 Costs $41.8 Net Present Value –$367.4 Benefit-Cost Ratio all-loss Transportation User Impacts –$325.1 Travel Time Savings –$268.5 Economic Case Vehicle Operating Cost Savings –$39.4 Decongestion on Road Network –$13.0 Safety Impacts –$4.2 Environmental Impacts –$0.5 Constructability Neutral Stakeholder Impacts Supportive Room for Growth Neutral Approvals/Permits Required Supportive Operating Impacts Neutral Deliverability & Operations Case Other Key Risks and Impacts Supportive (Impacts over a 60-year period. Millions of 2015 $ Present Value, unless otherwise noted) RER New Stations Initial Business Case: Lawrence East – draft Table of Contents Executive Summary page 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Scope and Purpose ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Site Options and Scenarios Analyzed ................................................................................................. 2 2. Cluster Screening ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3. Station Context and Concept Plan .............................................................................................. 6 3.1 Station Location ................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Current Land Uses in Area .................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Surrounding Transportation Infrastructure........................................................................................... 7 3.4 Concept Plan Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 7 4. Strategic Case ............................................................................................................................ 10 4.1 Strategic Case Summary ................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Approach ........................................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Rationale for a New Station ............................................................................................................... 11 4.3.1 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................... 11 4.3.2 Drivers for Change ................................................................................................................ 11 4.3.3 Station Objectives ................................................................................................................. 12 4.3.4 Constraints and Interdependencies ...................................................................................... 12 4.3.5 Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 13 4.4 Policy, Land Use and Development .................................................................................................. 14 4.4.1 Policy Alignment ................................................................................................................... 14 4.4.2 Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2740 Lawrence Avenue East – Zoning Amendment - Subdivision
    REPORT FOR ACTION Final Report - 2740 Lawrence Avenue East – Zoning Amendment - Subdivision Date: May 31, 2021 To: Scarborough Community Council From: Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District Wards: 21 - Scarborough Centre Planning Application Number: 19 242173 ESC 21 OZ and 19 242185 ESC 21 SB SUMMARY This rezoning application proposes to establish appropriate new land use and performance standard provisions to permit a new residential subdivision comprising 35 detached single-family dwellings and 65 street townhouses at 2740 Lawrence Avenue East (see Attachment 2: Location Map). The Draft Plan of Subdivision application (as illustrated on Attachment 7: Draft Plan of Subdivision) proposes to create a new 18.5 metre wide public street in a P-loop configuration providing site access from Lawrence Avenue East, together with an approximately 0.25 hectare new public park and two public walkways. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). Staff have considered the application within the context of applicable Official Plan policies and the City's Townhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines. The proposal responds to the distinct characteristics of the site, deploying the proposed density in appropriate building types that are compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. This report also advises that the Chief Planner may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Planning Division recommends that: Final Report - 2740 Lawrence Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Page 1 of 47 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling 2 3
    Unsettling 2 3 Bendale neighbourhood Unsettling Basil AlZeri Lori Blondeau Duorama Terrance Houle Lisa Myers Curated by Bojana Videkanic Cover: Scarborough Bluffs 6 7 Highland Creek Contents 12 (Un)settled Histories Bojana Videkanic 36 Nourishment as Resistance Elwood Jimmy 40 Sub/urban/altern Cosmopolitanism: Unsettling Scarborough’s Cartographic Imaginary Ranu Basu 54 Scarborough Cannot Be Boxed In Shawn Micallef 88 List of Works 92 Bios 98 Acknowledgements 10 11 Gatineau Hydro Corridor 13 I am moved by my love for human life; (Un)settled Histories by the firm conviction that all the world Bojana Videkanic must stop the butchery, stop the slaughter. I am moved by my scars, by my own filth to re-write history with my body to shed the blood of those who betray themselves To life, world humanity I ascribe To my people . my history . I address my vision. —Lee Maracle, “War,” Bent Box To unsettle means to disturb, unnerve, and upset, but could also mean to offer pause for thinking otherwise about an issue or an idea. From May to October 2017, (Un)settled, a six-month-long curatorial project, took place at Guild Park and Gardens in south Scarborough, and at the Doris McCarthy Gallery at the University of Toronto Scarborough (where the exhibition was titled Unsettling), showcasing the work of Lori Blondeau, Lisa Myers, Duorama, Basil AlZeri, and Terrance Houle. The project was a multi-pronged collaboration between myself, the Department of Fine Arts at the University of Waterloo, the Doris McCarthy Gallery, Friends of the Guild, the Waterloo Archives, the 7a*11d International Performance Art Festival’s special project 7a*md8, curated by Golboo Amani and Francisco-Fernando Granados, and the Landmarks Project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port Lands Innovation & Creativity Cluster
    THE PORT LANDS INNOVATION & CREATIVITY CLUSTER Port Lands Film Studio Precinct (View North West) www.tplc.ca Building on a Solid Foundation In 2002, Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC), then operating as TEDCO, conducted research examining why Toronto was losing big productions to other cities. The City of Toronto had determined that the creation of a more competitive film and television industry was a priority and research showed the need for purpose-built studio space and larger sound studios as key in attracting major feature film production. In support of the City’s policy TPLC organized an international, open competitive bid for a private joint venture consortium to develop the new project. Innovation & Creativity Cluster In 2004, Toronto Film Studios and its parent, the Rose Corporation The Cluster was initiated in 2008 with the launch of Pinewood Toronto were selected to develop the new film and media complex on TPLC Studios (then Filmport) Phase 1. Building on the new economy with land in the Port Lands. Once the investors were in place, TPLC an eye on expanding Toronto’s economic base, cluster development conducted a 30-acre remediation of the lands, receiving recognition is a strategy crossing disciplines to ensure Toronto’s future global as a finalist in the esteemed Brownfield Awards competitions in 2007. competitiveness. This kind of district conversion combined with urban TPLC negotiated a long-term lease, cleaned up a contaminated site, brownfield redevelopment is well suited to revitalizing the Port Lands. attracted the first private sector commercial development to the Port Lands, supported jobs in the film and media industry, and created a The Innovation and Creativity Cluster (ICC) supports job growth with catalyst for revitalizing this area of the Port Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Lands Area Update RA9.6
    RA9.5 and 1. Port Lands Area Update RA9.6 2. Purchase of 915 and 945 Lake Shore Boulevard East (Showline Studios) and Sale of 675 Commissioners Street - Update March 2018 Michael Kraljevic CreateTO Working with the City’s real estate to create opportunity, community and a better Toronto for all. Join us as we transform our brand. Agenda ● Port Lands Portfolio ● Land Ownership in the Port Lands ● Port Lands Planning Framework ● Don River Renaturalization ● Current Film Activities ● Port Lands Opportunities - First Gulf Development - Sidewalk Labs - Showline Studios ● Q/A CreateTO Working with the City’s real estate to create opportunity, community and a better Toronto for all. Join us as we transform our brand. 2 View West from the Port Lands CreateTO Working with the City’s real estate to create opportunity, community and a better Toronto for all. Join us as we transform our brand. 3 Port Lands Ownership Map CreateTO Working with the City’s real estate to create opportunity, community and a better Toronto for all. Join us as we transform our brand. 4 Port Lands Portfolio • CreateTO is largest landowner in the Port Lands • Owns and manages 425 acres • Other large land owners include the private sector, provincial (OPG Lands) and federal governments/government bodies (PortsToronto) • Leases/licenses • In excess of 120 tenancy arrangements, including film media leases in excess of 90 years and dockwall leases for original terms of 999 years • Of the 5,579 jobs in the Port Lands, CreateTO directly supports 5,000 jobs through its tenancy arrangements CreateTO Working with the City’s real estate to create opportunity, community and a better Toronto for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Planning
    PORT LANDS PLANNING FRAMEWORK Purpose / Elements of the Planning Framework The Purpose of the Port Lands Planning Framework is to: Elements of the Planning Framework: • Integrate the other planning initiatives currently underway • An overall vision for the Port Lands and development objectives • A connections plan which will identify: • Update and refresh the vision for the Port Lands o Major and intermediate streets o Major pedestrian and cycling facilities • Provide a comprehensive picture of how the area should redevelop over the long-term and o A transit plan that also addresses City Council direction reconcile competing interests • Generalized land use direction • Provide a flexible/adaptable planning regime • Identification of character areas • A parks and open space plan which will define: • Ensure sustainable community building o Green corridors o District / Regional parks • Ensure that public and private investments contribute to the long-term vision and have o Water’s Edge Promenades lasting value • A heritage inventory and direction for listing/designating heritage resources • Provide the basis for Official Plan amendments • Urban design principles and structure plan: o Built form and building typologies • Resolve Ontario Municipal Board appeals of the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan o Special sites (catalyst uses) o Relationship of development to major public spaces o Urban design context for heritage features o Identification of major views • A high -level community services and facilities strategy • Implementation and phasing direction PROCESS WE ARE HERE PHASE 2: PHASE 1: PHASE 3: Vision / Background Recommendations Alternatives CONSULTATION Public Meeting | November 28, 2013 PORT LANDS PLANNING FRAMEWORK Port Lands Acceleration Initiative Plan (PLAI) EASTER N AV.E DON VALLEY PARKWAY EASTERN AVENUE Don River DON RIVER NOD RI REV STREET LESLIE KRAP LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD EAST Port Lands Acceleration Initiative (PLAI) TRLYA DRS The PLAI was initiated in October 2011 to: New River Crossing DON ROADWAY CARLAW AVE.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Keating Channel Municipal Class EA and Precinct Plan Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project
    Lower Don Lands: Keating Channel Municipal Class EA and Precinct Plan Don Mouth Naturalization and Port lands Flood Protection Project Public Forum #3 Summary Report St. Lawrence Hall May 9, 2009 This report was prepared by Lura Consulting, the neutral facilitator and consultation specialist for the Lower Don Lands project. It presents the key discussion points and outcomes from the May 9th 2009 public forum convened as part of the Lower Don Lands Keating Channel Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) and Precinct Plan process, and the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please contact: Andrea Kelemen Waterfront Toronto 20 Bay Street, Suite 1310 Toronto, ON M5J 2N8 Tel (416) 214-1344 ext.248 Fax (416) 214-4591 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents 1. About Public Forum #3 ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Open House ............................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Welcome and Introductions ...................................................................................................................... 3 4. Presentations .......................................................................................................................................... 4 5. Questions and Feedback .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • LAWRENCE AVENUE EAST STUDY - Final Report
    PREPARED BY: LAWRENCE AVENUE EAST STUDY - Final Report Young + Wright Architects Inc. City of Toronto GHK International (Canada) Ltd. Dillon Consulting Ltd. J. C. Williams Group Ltd. March 2008 A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T L A W R E N C E A V E N U E E A S T S T U D Y A CKNOWLEDGEMENT We would like to acknowledge the effort and commitment of the Local Advisory Committee (LAC) and City of Toronto staff whose contribution and dedication to this study was invaluable. Thank you to: LAC Members : Study Team: Sofia Abaza Young + Wright Architects Paget Blaza ▪ Ronji Borooah Hussein Darouiche ▪ Jane Yiqun Kuang Bradely Edwards ▪ Darlene Broderick Robert Givelas Raphael Gomez GHK International (Canada) ltd. Tom Lyons ▪ John Gladki Gerard Panossian ▪ Andrew Davidge Jose Rhodes ▪ Kelly Skeith John Wadman Dillion Consulting Ltd. City of Toronto: ▪ Mike Walters Councillor Michael Thompson Ihor Wons J.C. Williams Group Ltd. Victor Gottwald - Project Manager ▪ John Archer Russell Crooks Ed Watkins Robert Stephens Carolyn Johnson MARCH 2008 YOUNG + WRIGHT ARCHITECTS INC. - GHK INTERNATIONAL (CANADA) LTD. DILLON CONSULTING LTD. - J.C. WILLIAMS GROUP LTD. This page has been intentionally left blank. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S L A W R E N C E A V E N U E E A S T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Executive Summary 1 Section 1.0 Study Background 11 1.1 Purpose of the Study 12 1.2 Study Process 12 Section 2.0 Policy Context 15 2.1 Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 16 2.2 Places to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 17 2.3 Official Plan for
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Page 1 Toronto Public Library Board Meeting No. 1
    AGENDA Page 1 Toronto Public Library Board Meeting No. 1: Monday, January 27, 2020, 6:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Toronto Reference Library, Boardroom, 789 Yonge Street, Toronto Toronto Reference Library is on Indigenous land. This is the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (also known as the Six Nations Confederacy), the Wendat, and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation. Toronto Public Library gratefully acknowledges these Indigenous nations for their guardianship of this land. We’d also like to remind and reaffirm, as Torontonians and Canadians, our accountability to these Indigenous nations, and to all Indigenous peoples and communities living in Toronto. This land is also part of the Dish with One Spoon territory, that includes a treaty between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, the Anishinaabek and allied nations, to peaceably share and care for this land, its waters, and all of the biodiversity in the Great Lakes region. All those who come to live and work here are responsible for honouring this treaty in the spirit of peace, friendship, and respect. Members: Ms. Sue Graham-Nutter (Chair) Mr. Fenton Jagdeo Mr. Jonathan Hoss (Vice Chair) Ms. Jennifer Liu Councillor Paul Ainslie Ms. Alison Menary Mr. Sarwar Choudhury Councillor Gord Perks Ms. Andrea Geddes Poole Mr. Alim Remtulla Closed Meeting Requirements: If the Toronto Public Library Board wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the Board must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Board has to meet privately (Public Libraries Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.44, s.
    [Show full text]
  • For Lease up to 9,055 Sf Available
    FOR LEASE UP TO 9,055 SF AVAILABLE 27 MOBILE DRIVE TORONTO 27 Mobile Drive is an excellent standalone flex office opportunity. 27 MOBILE DRIVE Located close to downtown Toronto and major highways, it provides the unique opportunity for a tenant to command TORONTO the presence of a high-end character building, while have the flexibility of a portion of the facility to be manufacturing with OVERVIEW loading capabilities. FEATURES HIGHLIGHTS Available Space: 9,055 sf • Building signage available Semi Gross Rent: $20.00 psf • Loading available Occupancy: Immediately • Close to major highways Parking Ratio: 1/900 sf • 14 ft. ceilings HIGHWAY 401 BIRCHMOUNT ROAD DEMOGRAPHICS LAWRENCE EAST DON VALLEY PARKWAY DON MILLS ROAD YORK MILLS ROAD KENNEDY ROAD 2 MINS 17 MINS 2 MINS LESLIE STREET TO BUS TO TTC SUBWAY TO DON VALLEY WARDEN AVENUE ROUTE STATION PARKWAY ST E EA E AVENU LESLIE STREET LAWRENC KENNEDY S L TRANSIT MAP O AGA A FLOOR PLAN N KHAN 27 E MOBILE A DON MUSEUM DRIVE V E MILLS N U SHOPS E EGLINTON AVENUELRT EGLINTON EAST ROUTE 91 VICTORIA PARK AVENUE ROUTE B 34 E R M O U N T S E LRT EGLINTON ONTARIO Y SCIENCE RD EGLINTON AVE EAST CENTRE LAIRD ROAD WARDEN BAYVIEW AVENUE OVERLEA BLVD ST. CLAIR AVENUE EAST O’CONNOR DRIVE Cushman & Wakefield ULC, Brokerage Cushman & Wakefield ULC, Brokerage 27 MOBILE DRIVE TORONTO Alan Rawn* Vice President 416 359 2440 [email protected] Michael Scace* Executive Vice President 416 359 2456 CONTACT [email protected] Lauren Luchini* Associate Vice President 416 359 2553 [email protected] Cushman & Wakefield ULC, Brokerage 161 Bay Street, Suite 1500 Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 cushmanwakefield.com ©2020 Cushman & Wakefield ULC.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Toronto's Downtown East
    Introducing Toronto’s Downtown East by Linda Mitchell Young & Hunter Milborne River & Fifth - looking west from the Don Valley Introducing Toronto’s Downtown East by Linda Mitchell Young & Hunter Milborne Historically, the most important factor in real estate investing has always been location. The wrong locations can cause property values to stagnate or see very limited interest, while the best locations will always be in high demand. But today’s market is more like playing hockey. In a city where there are so many well-established neighbourhoods already – if you’re trying to score, you don’t skate to where the puck is already, you need to go where the puck is going next. Introducing Toronto’s Downtown East by Linda Mitchell Young & Hunter Milborne Corktown is a prime example of a neighbourhood that has not yet reached its full potential but is undergoing rapid infrastructure growth. The neighbourhood has been identified by real estate developer Broccolini – and should easily be identified by investors. River & Fifth sits in between Corktown and Riverside, just east of the financial core, south of Dundas, north of Queen/King. It is perfectly situated to take advantage of existing features and upcoming developments in the area, dubbed now as the emerging Downtown East. Location Map It has already been long established that proximity to downtown and to transit are the first things to look at when assessing a potential location for investment, and Corktown enjoys this strategic location. There are also several designated bike lanes and streetcar lines providing quick access to Toronto’s financial district and waterfront.
    [Show full text]