The Critical Characteristics of Chinese Chinese Characters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Critical Characteristics of Chinese Chinese Characters http://www.paper.edu.cn The Critical Characteristics of Chinese Chinese Characters Zi Gusheng (School of Foreign Languages, Yunnan Agricultural University) Abstract: The Chinese writing system has been developing for millennia, in which Chinese characters have experienced successive evolution of the Oracle Script, the Bronze Script, the Seal Script, the Clerical Script, the Grass Script, the Running Script, the Standard Scripts and the Simplified Script, let alone the variants of their pronunciation. With the development of computer technology, many flexible and pragmatic fonts have been created and used alongside, which makes the admirable and chameleonic Chinese characters appealing and puzzling to many beginners in learning Chinese. To make their learning Chinese more pleasant and fruitful, this paper briefly and analytically illustrates the pivotal characteristics of Chinese Chinese characters (CCC). Key words: Chinese character, script, writing style, font, pronunciation, meaning 1. Introduction Chinese belongs to the Sino-Tibetan language family, which is also called Zhengwen, Putonghua, Hanyu, Huayu, Guanhua, Guoyu, Mandarin, Standard Chinese and the like. Chinese characters have been developing with such a system in which most of the symbols represent concepts along with the corresponding pronunciations. The very first characters were created from the graphic representation of corresponding objects; for example, 日 (rì, sun) used to be the outline of the sun in the sky , 目 (mù, eye) used to be the profile of a pair of human eyes . In the course of evolution, pictographs, ideographs, composite ideographs, semantic-phonetic compounds, transformed characters and borrowed characters came into being to meet the needs of daily communication and records. Many homophones have been gradually accumulated, polysemies aggregated along, and various writing styles and fonts have been created as well. Generally the square-shaped Chinese characters, formed by strokes, carry their own specific orthography, pronunciation and semantics, which seems too arbitrary and perplexing for beginners and laymen to learn, master and use. Because of rectification, a majority of our daily or commonly used CCC do not carry their originally obvious or direct link between form, sound and meaning. As a result, the present simplified CCC make their writing simpler and more convenient, but much more difficult for beginners to learn and master. In order to familiarize those learners with Chinese characters and make their learning Chinese more enjoyable and fruitful, a brief account of the holistic characteristics of CCC with the evolution of Chinese characters and the intrinsic properties of CCC are illustrated and analyzed in this paper. 2. A Brief Account of the Holistic Characteristics of CCC with their Evolution The specific origin of Chinese characters is still waiting for greater efforts to determine though Chinese legend has it that Chinese characters were originally created by Cang Jie (the Left Historiographer of Emperor Xuanyuan, 仓颉, 轩辕黄帝左史官), who was an official recorder of the legendary Huangdi (Emperor Huang) of China in about 2,600 BC, and archaeological findings with unearthed oracles during 19-20th centuries have traced Chinese characters back to the Shang Dynasty in 1,700 BC. Moreover, Chinese commentaries through the centuries hold that the fully developed form of Chinese characters can be traced back to Cāngjié (仓颉篇), a non-extant work of character recognition listing about 3,300 Chinese characters in Small Seal Script. This legendary work has been purported to be compiled by Li Si, the Emperor’s Prime Minister (丞相) during the reign of the first Emperor of China, Qin Shihuang (306 BC – 250 BC), on the grounds that currency, laws, weights, measures and writing were all systemized after the unification, and that nearly all the books were burnt during the disastrous campaign of “Burn Books and Bury Confucian Scholars Alive” (213 BC – 206 BC). Characters different from those found in the newly compiled Cāngjié were discarded so that the characters in Li Si’s Cāngjié in Small Seal Script became the standard, though Li Si’s Cāngjié was based on the characters used in all the seven former kingdoms before the Qin Dynasty. Philological and etymological researches have verified that Chinese characters were initially pictographs (also known as pictograms or logograms) symbolizing the referent of the real and concrete objects in the world. And it has been found that most of the primitive pictographs are only iconic, looking like the shape with the most important characteristic of the objects they stand for. For example, 目(mù, eye): 1 http://www.paper.edu.cn pictograph of a pair of eyes (originally , later on, , and );月(yuè, moon): pictograph of the moon ; 日(rì, sun): pictograph of the sun , 门(mén, door): pictograph of two leaves of a door facing each other . As time went on and people were eager to express some more complex ideas or concepts, a few ideographs were then created, which look like some visible things but denote something abstract. For example, 高 (gāo, tall, high), used to be , which looks like a high building at that time, implying “as tall / high as the house”. Gradually people learned to make composite ideographs by combining two or more pictographs to suggest an idea. The components for the composites can be different pictographs or identical ones. In this way, a number of new characters came into being and use. For example, 明 (míng, bright): a sun (日) and a moon (月), implying that it must be bright with a sun and a moon together in the sky at the same time; 好 (hǎo, good): a woman (女) with a child (子) beside, indicating that it is good like that; 森 (sēn, woods, forest): a tree (木) with another two trees, meaning such places as woods or forest in which there are many trees growing together Still, there were many objects and abstract ideas that were difficult to explicitly express through pictographs, ideographs or composite ideographs. Then came the phonetic-semantic compounds formed by adding different phonetics to significs, in which the signific suggests meaning, the phonetic indicates pronunciation, which may be twisted from its original or remain identical to its original. For example, “鸟” (niǎo, bird) is the general term for birds, but there are various birds in the world, and it is impossible to differentiate each of them by way of pictography or ideography. The dilemma was solved with the help of phonetic-semantic compounds as 鸽 (gē, pigeon), 鹤 (hè, crane), 鹅 (é, goose). These three characters have been created with “鸟” (niǎo, bird) as the signific and their own phonetic tokens, to stand for the corresponding different birds, though they are pronounced differently from the mother character “鸟” (niǎo). 像(xàing, like) is made of 亻(rén, person) and 象(xiàng, elephant), in which 亻(rén, person) is used to discern 像(xàing, like) from 象(xàing, elephant, though they sound the same. Moreover, some Transformed Characters (also called Transferred Characters or Derived Characters) were created with shared radicals or components to stand for the same referent, though they are pronounced differently and applied in different regions. For example, 老 (lǎo) and 考 (kǎo) share a common etymological root “耂” meaning “old”, implying they both mean “old” but differ in that one part is changed to indicate a different pronunciation at the beginning. 爸(bà) and 爹(diē) are a pair of transformed characters, both of which possess the radical 父(fù, father) and mean father, though 爸 was mainly used in the south, while 爹 in the north. With such new coinages, Chinese language gradually gained a considerable collection of usable characters. In the course of applying those characters by different people in different circumstances or places, many existing characters acquired new meanings with the same or similar pronunciation, which have been called the borrowed characters (also known as phonetic loans). For example, 明(míng): bright (a.) → clear (a.) → understand, know (v.); 好: good (a., hǎo) → like (v., hào). As far as the borrowed characters are concerned, semantic and phonological variants of the same character(s) can be found in Chinese Chinese characters (hanzi), Japanese Chinese characters (kanji) and Korean Chinese characters (hanja or hanmun). For example, “汤” means “soup” in hanzi, but “hot water” in kanji, “soup” and “bath” in hanja; “勉强” means “to be forced” in hanzi, but “study” in kanji; “手纸” is pronounced “shǒuzhǐ”, meaning “toilet paper” in hanzi, while pronounced “tegami”, meaning “letter” in kanji. Even within CCC, the same character can be pronounced quite differently in mainland China and Taiwan, without mentioning different dialects. For example, 垃, 崖, 幢, 堤 are pronounced respectively in mainland China as lā, yá, zhuàng, dī, while in Taiwan as lè, yái, chuáng, and tí. To transcribe spoken Chinese of native Chinese speakers and mark the pronunciation of the characters concerned, over the past two centuries, four transliteration systems have been designed --- (1) Wade-Giles System, (2) Gwoyu Romatzyh, (3) Zhuyin Fuhao, and (4) Pinyin System. Wade-Giles System is a system of recording and pronouncing Chinese characters in Latin letters. It was invented by Sir Thomas Francis Wade and Herbert Allen Giles in the 1870s. It came into use in 1895 and was modified by Herbert Allen Giles in 1912 (e.g. ai, chai, ch`ai, ch`uai, ch`üeh). Gwoyu Romatzyh,which was created by Y. R. Chao in 1920s eliminated the use of graphs and numbers to represent tones, and used letters instead (e.g. chai, chair, chae, chay). 2 http://www.paper.edu.cn Zhuyin Fuhao, developed in 1913, is a system based on the shape of the strokes of CCC. It was the major phonetic system used in China until the early 1950s and is still being used in Taiwan today (e.g. ㄓㄞ, ㄔㄞ, ㄓㄨㄞ).
Recommended publications
  • Towards Chinese Calligraphy Zhuzhong Qian
    Macalester International Volume 18 Chinese Worlds: Multiple Temporalities Article 12 and Transformations Spring 2007 Towards Chinese Calligraphy Zhuzhong Qian Desheng Fang Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl Recommended Citation Qian, Zhuzhong and Fang, Desheng (2007) "Towards Chinese Calligraphy," Macalester International: Vol. 18, Article 12. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl/vol18/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for Global Citizenship at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Macalester International by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Towards Chinese Calligraphy Qian Zhuzhong and Fang Desheng I. History of Chinese Calligraphy: A Brief Overview Chinese calligraphy, like script itself, began with hieroglyphs and, over time, has developed various styles and schools, constituting an important part of the national cultural heritage. Chinese scripts are generally divided into five categories: Seal script, Clerical (or Official) script, Regular script, Running script, and Cursive script. What follows is a brief introduction of the evolution of Chinese calligraphy. A. From Prehistory to Xia Dynasty (ca. 16 century B.C.) The art of calligraphy began with the creation of Chinese characters. Without modern technology in ancient times, “Sound couldn’t travel to another place and couldn’t remain, so writings came into being to act as the track of meaning and sound.”1 However, instead of characters, the first calligraphy works were picture-like symbols. These symbols first appeared on ceramic vessels and only showed ambiguous con- cepts without clear meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character
    Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N4701 Date: 2015-10-23 Source: WG 2 meeting 64, Kunibiki Messe, Matsue, Shimane, Japan; 2015-10-19/23 Title: Recommendations from WG 2 meeting 64 Action: For approval by SC 2 and for information to WG 2 Status: Adopted at meeting 64 of WG 2 Distribution: WG2 meeting 64 (ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 and WG 2) Experts accredited by the national bodies or liaison organizations for Canada, China, IRG, Japan, SEI - UC Berkeley (Liaison), TCA (Liaison), the United Kingdom, the Unicode Consortium (Liaison), and the USA were present when the following recommendations were adopted (see attached attendance list). Character count 120585 in 4th edition 101 additions in DAM1 to the 4th edition 11630 in PDAM2.1 (end of meeting 63) Character count 132316 (total allocated till end of meeting 63) Note: Some of the referenced proposals in this document are contributions from the Unicode Consortium and do not have a WG2 document number. Observation M64.01 (Amendment 2 changes since meeting 63): WG2 notes that in addition to the total of 11630 characters listed in recommendation M63.11 (document N4604), progression of Amendment 2 through PDAM 2.2 and to DAM2 stages has resulted in several changes as summarized in document N4665. The net is that total number of characters that went for DAM2 ballot was 7332. count: 7332 additions in Amendment 2 Observation M64.02 (Additions in 5th edition ballot): WG2 also notes that the balloted text for CD of the 5th edition contained the Amendment 1 and DAM2 content, plus several changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinitic Language and Script in East Asia: Past and Present
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 264 December, 2016 Sinitic Language and Script in East Asia: Past and Present edited by Victor H. Mair Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS FOUNDED 1986 Editor-in-Chief VICTOR H. MAIR Associate Editors PAULA ROBERTS MARK SWOFFORD ISSN 2157-9679 (print) 2157-9687 (online) SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series dedicated to making available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor-in-chief actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including romanized modern standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino- Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. Submissions are regularly sent out to be refereed, and extensive editorial suggestions for revision may be offered. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Simplification of Chinese Characters in Japan and China
    CONTRASTING APPROACHES TO CHINESE CHARACTER REFORM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SIMPLIFICATION OF CHINESE CHARACTERS IN JAPAN AND CHINA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2012 By Kei Imafuku Thesis Committee: Alexander Vovin, Chairperson Robert Huey Dina Rudolph Yoshimi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express deep gratitude to Alexander Vovin, Robert Huey, and Dina R. Yoshimi for their Japanese and Chinese expertise and kind encouragement throughout the writing of this thesis. Their guidance, as well as the support of the Center for Japanese Studies, School of Pacific and Asian Studies, and the East-West Center, has been invaluable. i ABSTRACT Due to the complexity and number of Chinese characters used in Chinese and Japanese, some characters were the target of simplification reforms. However, Japanese and Chinese simplifications frequently differed, resulting in the existence of multiple forms of the same character being used in different places. This study investigates the differences between the Japanese and Chinese simplifications and the effects of the simplification techniques implemented by each side. The more conservative Japanese simplifications were achieved by instating simpler historical character variants while the more radical Chinese simplifications were achieved primarily through the use of whole cursive script forms and phonetic simplification techniques. These techniques, however, have been criticized for their detrimental effects on character recognition, semantic and phonetic clarity, and consistency – issues less present with the Japanese approach. By comparing the Japanese and Chinese simplification techniques, this study seeks to determine the characteristics of more effective, less controversial Chinese character simplifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Radical-Derived Character E-Learning Platform to Increase Learner Knowledge of Chinese Characters
    Language Learning & Technology February 2013, Volume 17, Number 1 http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2013/chenetal.pdf pp. 89–106 USING A RADICAL-DERIVED CHARACTER E-LEARNING PLATFORM TO INCREASE LEARNER KNOWLEDGE OF CHINESE CHARACTERS Hsueh-Chih Chen, National Taiwan Normal University Chih-Chun Hsu, National Defense University Li-Yun Chang, University of Pittsburgh Yu-Chi Lin, National Taiwan Normal University Kuo-En Chang, National Taiwan Normal University Yao-Ting Sung, National Taiwan Normal University The present study is aimed at investigating the effect of a radical-derived Chinese character teaching strategy on enhancing Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) learners’ Chinese orthographic awareness. An e-learning teaching platform, based on statistical data from the Chinese Orthography Database Explorer (Chen, Chang, L.Y., Chou, Sung, & Chang, K.E., 2011), was established and used as an auxiliary teaching tool. A nonequivalent pretest-posttest quasi-experiment was conducted, with 129 Chinese- American CFL learners as participants (69 people in the experimental group and 60 people in the comparison group), to examine the effectiveness of the e-learning platform. After a three-week course—involving instruction on Chinese orthographic knowledge and at least seven phonetic/semantic radicals and their derivative characters per week—the experimental group performed significantly better than the comparison group on a phonetic radical awareness test, a semantic radical awareness test, as well as an orthography knowledge test. Keywords: Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL), Chinese Orthographic Awareness, Radical-Derived Character Instructional Method, Phonetic/Semantic Radicals INTRODUCTION The rise of China to international prominence in recent years has made learning Chinese extremely popular, and increasing numbers of non-native Chinese students have begun to choose Chinese as their second language of study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Script T � * 'L
    Norman, Jerry, Chinese, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 1 3.1 Th e beginnings of Chinese writing 59 3 FISH HORSE ELEPHANT cow (yu) (m ii) (xiimg) (niu) " The Chinese script t � * 'l Figure 3.1. Pictographs in early Chinese writing 3.1 The beginnings of Chinese writing1 The Chinese script appears as a fully developed writing system in the late Shang .dynasty (fourteenth to eleventh centuries BC). From this period we have copious examples of the script inscribed or written on bones and tortoise shells, for the most part in the form of short divinatory texts. From the same period there also Figure 3.2. The graph fo r quiin'dog' exist a number of inscriptions on bronze vessels of various sorts. The former type of graphic record is referred to as the oracle bone script while the latter is com­ of this sort of graph are shown in Figure 3.1. The more truly representational a monly known· as the bronze script. The script of this period is already a fully graph is, the more difficult and time-consuming it is to depict. There is a natural developed writing system, capable of recording the contemporary Chinese lan­ tendency for such graphs to become progressively simplified and stylized as a guage in a complete and unambiguous manner. The maturity of this early script writing system matures and becomes more widely used. As a result, pictographs has suggested to many scholars that it must have passed through a fairly long gradually tend to lose their obvious pictorial quality. The graph for qui'in 'dog' period of development before reaching this stage, but the few examples of writing shown in Figure 3.2 can serve as a good illustration of this sort of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Encode Small Seal Script in UCS Source: TCA and China Action: for Consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N4634 Date: 2014-09-30 Title: Proposal to encode Small Seal Script in UCS Source: TCA and China Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 This document proposes to encode 10,516 Small Seal Script characters in UCS. Note: This document shows 799 of 10,516 characters, with TrueType fonts. The fonts of remaining ones will be provided later. The 799 characters in this document are selected from Volume 1 of the 14 volumes Tenghuaxie version Shuowen Jiezi (14 卷 藤花榭本說文解字). 1. Small Seal Script and the Book Shuowen Jiezi The Small Seal script (小篆) is a kind of ancient Chinese script, predecessor of modern Chinese (漢字, Hanzi). The book Shuowen Jiezi (說文解字), edited by Xu Shen (許慎, 58 AD to 147 AD), collects the Small Seal characters of Qin Dynasty (秦, 220 BC to 206 BC) of China. The collection contains 9,353 canonical Small Seal characters, 1163 variants (called “Chongwen” in Shuowen Jiezi). Chongwen contains Zhouwen (籀文, Small Seal script in Zhou Dynasty, 周 1046 BC to 256 BC) and Guwen (古文, the scripts used in the other six nations excluding Qin in the Warring States period, 475 BC to 221 BC) which are incompatible with Small Seal characters. There were two types of publicly accepted scripts prevailing in Qin Dynasty, canonical Small Seal script and clerical script which was used by the public (known as Qin Li in philology, also named Gu Li to distinguish from subsequent Han Li). Some people think Small Seal script is a calligraphy typeface, which is a misunderstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Evolvement of Chinese Characters
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portal Czasopism Naukowych (E-Journals) BI WEI THE ORIGIN AND EVOLVEMENT OF CHINESE CHARACTERS Writing, the carrier of culture and the symbol of human civilization, fi rst appeared in Sumer1. Like other ancient languages of Egypt and India, ancient Sumerian symbols have been lost in the process of history, but only Chinese characters still remain in use today. They have played a signifi cant role in the development of Chinese lan- guage and culture. This article intends to display how Chinese characters were creat- ed and how they were simplifi ed from the ancient form of writing to more abstract. Origin of Chinese characters Chinese characters, in their initial forms, were beautiful and appropriately refl ected images in the minds of ancient Chinese that complied with their understanding of reality. Chinese people selected the way of expressing meaning by fi gures and pic- tures, and Chinese characters begun with drawings. Three Myths in Ancient Times It is diffi cult to determine the specifi c time when the Chinese characters emerged. There are three old myths about the origin of Chinese characters. The fi rst refers to the belief that Chinese characters were created by Fu Xi – the fi rst of Three Sovereigns2 in ancient China, who has drew the Eight Trigrams which have evolved into Chinese characters. The mysterious Eight Trigrams3 used for divination are composed of the symbols “–” and “– –”, representing Yang and Yin respectively. 1 I.J. Gelb, Sumerian language, [in:] Encyclopedia Britannica Online, Encyclopedia Britannica, re- trieved 30.07.2011, www.britannica.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosodic Structure in Chinese Characters, Revisited
    Prosodic structure Thanks! Overview • Grants from Taiwan’s National Science Council / • Character “prosody” Ministry of Science and Technology: • in Chinese characters, • NSC 97‐2410‐H‐194‐067‐MY3, NSC101‐2410‐H‐194‐115‐ Radical position and reduction MY3, MOST 103‐2410‐H‐194‐119‐MY3 • Reduplication revisited • Many lab assistants over the years: • Stroke shape and position • Ko Yuguang, Yang Chentsung, Hsu Chiung‐Wen, Hong • Guo‐Ming, Hsu Zi‐Ping, Du Pei‐Fen, Su Yu‐Ting, Liu Yu‐ Lengthened strokes James Myers Jay, Chuang Wei‐Chiang, Hsieh Yu‐Yi, Pan Hsiao‐Yin, Su • Curved strokes National Chung Cheng University Si‐Qi • Hooked strokes [email protected] • Plus: • Chen Tsung‐Ying, Zev Handel, Wolfgang Behr, Jane Tsay, Niina Zhang, and Lin Yu‐Hsuan 2 3 ILAS Workshop on Phonetics and Phonology – October 2017 Overview Chinese characters are productive Chinese character grammar • Duality of patterning • Character “prosody” Exponential growth • Radical position and reduction Productivity “Morphology” (model fit > 80%) • • Reduplication implies Recursion (Sproat, 2000) • Stroke shape and position grammar…. 鱗 • Lengthened strokes • • Curved strokes Shape regularities (Wang, 1983) • Hooked strokes 牛 → 特 cf. 牢 “Phonology” • “Prosody”: global shape constraints • Myers (1996, 2016) Data from Yip (2000, p. 19) 4 5 6 Character prosody Overview Radicals (部首) as affixes • Chinese characters tend to show: • Character “prosody” • Morphological properties • Binarity • Closed class • Asymmetrical edge prominence (right and bottom) • Radical position and
    [Show full text]
  • Index Časopisu Studia Orientalia Slovaca Ročníkov 1–10 (2002–2011) · a Cumulative Index to Studia Orientalia Slovaca Vols 1–10 (2002–2011)
    Index časopisu Studia Orientalia Slovaca ročníkov 1–10 (2002–2011) · A Cumulative Index to Studia Orientalia Slovaca vols 1–10 (2002–2011) Zostavili · compiled by Raoul David Findeisen Martin Slobodník∗ Štúdie · Articles 1 Anderl, Christoph. »Notes on the Development of Vernacular Literature in China and the Language of the Early Recorded Sayings« 4: 103–124 2 Andrš, Dušan. »Role umění v živote člověka: Feng Zikai a jeho příspěvek k čínské estetice první poloviny 20. století« [The Role of Art in the Life of Man: Feng Zikai and his Contribution to Chinese Aesthetics of the First Half of the Twentieth Century] 4: 153–175 3 Benická, Jana. »Čínsky mahāyānový buddhizmus: odstupňované spôsoby vhliadania pravej povahy sveta« [Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism: Different Stages of Discernment of the True Nature of the Phenomenal World] 1: 29–42 4 ——.»Večné “ja” v čínskom buddhizme? Rozhovory majstra Nanyang Huizhonga s „chanovým hosťom z juhu“« [Eternal »Self« in Chinese Buddhism? The Dialogues between Chan Master Nanyang Huizhong and the »Chan Guest from the South«] 2: 61–78 This index has been compiled with the cooperation of Katarína Čavojská, Ján Ďurica, Hana Kucharovičová, and Stanislav Vavrovský, hereby gratefully acknowledged. 458 Findeisen/Slobodník · Contents SOS 1–10 (2002–2011) 5 ——. »Taiwanci, Japonci alebo Číňania? O taiwanskej spoločnosti počas japonskej okupácie ostrova očami spisovateľa Wu Zhuoliua (1900–1976)« [Taiwanese, Japanese or Chinese? Taiwanese Society under Japanese Occupation as Viewed by the Writer Wu Zhuoliu (1900–1976)] 4: 125–140 6 ——. »Yogācāra a jej teória existencie “objektívnej podpory mysle”« [Yogācāra and Its Theory on the Existence of the »Objective Support« of the Mind] 6: 105–122 7 ——.
    [Show full text]
  • The Writing Revolution
    9781405154062_1_pre.qxd 8/8/08 4:42 PM Page iii The Writing Revolution Cuneiform to the Internet Amalia E. Gnanadesikan A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication 9781405154062_1_pre.qxd 8/8/08 4:42 PM Page iv This edition first published 2009 © 2009 Amalia E. Gnanadesikan Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing program has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical, and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell. Registered Office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services, and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of Amalia E. Gnanadesikan to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Standardization of Chinese Writing/ Ying Wang University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2008 A study of the standardization of Chinese writing/ Ying Wang University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Wang, Ying, "A study of the standardization of Chinese writing/" (2008). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2060. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2060 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STUDY OF THE STANDARDIZATION OF CHINESE WRITING A Thesis Presented by YING WANG Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2008 Asian Languages and Literatures © Copyright by Ying Wang All Rights Reserved STUDIES OF THE STANDARDIZATION OF CHINESE WRITING A Thesis Presented by YING WANG Approved as to style and content by: hongwei Shen, Chair Donald E. GjertsoH, Member Enhua Zhang, Member hongwei Shen, Director Asian Languages and Literatures Program Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures Julie Caii s, Chair Departira hguages, Literatures and Cultures ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to earnestly thank my advisor, Professor Zhongwei Shen, for his helpful, patient guidance and support in all the stages of my thesis writing. Thanks are also due to my committee members Professor Donald Gjertson and Professor Enhua Zhang, for their generous help. My friends, Mathew Flannery and Charlotte Mason, have also edited thesis my in various stages, and to them I am truly grateful.
    [Show full text]