'ISLANDER 'IDENTITIES: the CASES of HEYBELIADA and BURGAZADA
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
KADİR HAS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAM OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN STUDIES ‘ISLANDER ’IDENTITIES: THE CASES of HEYBELIADA and BURGAZADA EYLÜL ŞENSES MASTER’S THESIS ISTANBUL, JANUARY, 2020 Eylül Şenses Master’s Thesis 2020 ‘ISLANDER ’IDENTITIES: THE CASES of HEYBELIADA and BURGAZADA EYLÜL ŞENSES MASTER’S THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Kadir Has University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture and Urban Studies Master Program. ISTANBUL, JANUARY, 2020 DECLARATION OF RESEARCH ETHICS / METHODS OF DISSEMINATION I, EYLÜL ŞENSES, hereby declare that; • this Master’s Thesis is my own original Work and that due references have been appropriately provided on all supporting literature and resources; • this Master’s Thesis contains no material that has been submitted or accepted for a degree or diploma in any other educational institution; • I have followed “Kadir Has University Academic Ethics Principles” prepared in accordance with the “The Council of Higher Education’s Ethical Conduct Principles” In addition, I understand that any false claim in respect of this Work will result in disciplinary action in accordance with University regulations. Furthermore, both printed and electronic copies of my Work will be kept in Kadir Has Information Center under the following condition as indicated below: The full content of my thesis/project will not be accessible for 6 months. If no extension is required by the end of this period, the full content of my thesis/project will be automatically accessible from everywhere by all means. EYLÜL ŞENSES __________________________ January 2020 KADİR HAS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL This Work entitled ISLANDER IDENTITY: THE CASE of HEYBELIADA and BURGAZADA of ISTANBUL prepared by EYLÜL ŞENSES has been judged to be successful at the defense exam held on December, 2019 and accepted by our jury as MASTER’S THESIS. APPROVED BY: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Didem Kılıçkıran _______________ (Advisor) Kadir Has University Prof. Dr. Mine Özkar Kabakçıoğlu _______________ Istanbul Technical University Asst. Prof. Dr. Sait Ali Köknar _______________ Kadir Has University I certify that the above signatures belong to the faculty members named above. _______________ (Title, Name and Surname) Dean of School of Graduate Studies DATE OF APPROVAL: (Day/Month/Year) TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 2 ÖZET ................................................................................................................................ 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ 4 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ 6 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 7 2. THE CASE of HEYBELIADA ................................................................................ 22 2.1 The Past and the Present of the Island .................................................................. 22 2.2 Participants of the research .................................................................................... 24 2.3. Place, Belonging and Identity in Heybeliada ....................................................... 25 2.3.1. The Meanings of the Island ............................................................................... 25 2.3.2. The Mainland vs. the Island .............................................................................. 37 2.3.3. Everyday Life and Spaces ................................................................................. 42 2.3.3.1. Cafes ........................................................................................................... 44 2.3.3.2. Beach .......................................................................................................... 45 2.3.3.3. Water Sport Club ....................................................................................... 51 2.3.3.4. Forest / Picnic Area .................................................................................... 53 2.3.3.5. Institutions .................................................................................................. 55 2.3.3.5.1. The Naval High School ........................................................................... 56 2.3.3.5.2. The Sanatorium ....................................................................................... 57 2.3.3.6. Homes: Spaces of domesticity ................................................................... 59 2.3.4. Opinions Regarding Transformation ................................................................. 72 3. THE CASE of BURGAZADA .................................................................................. 73 3.1 The Past and the Present of the Island .................................................................. 74 3.2 Participants of the research .................................................................................... 77 3.3 Place, Belonging and Identity in Burgazada ......................................................... 78 3.3.1. The Meanings of the Island ............................................................................... 78 3.3.2. The Mainland vs. the Island .............................................................................. 85 3.3.3. Everyday Life and Spaces ................................................................................. 88 3.3.3.1. The Clubs ................................................................................................... 94 3.3.3.2. Beaches ...................................................................................................... 98 3.3.3.3. The Volunteer Center ............................................................................... 102 3.3.3.4. Cafes /Restaurants/ Bars .......................................................................... 103 3.3.3.5. Forest / Picnic Area .................................................................................. 104 3.3.3.6. Religious Buildings .................................................................................. 105 3.3.3.7. Reunion .................................................................................................... 106 3.3.3.8. Homes: Spaces of domesticity ................................................................. 107 3.3.4. Opinions Regarding Transformation ............................................................... 114 4. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 115 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 131 2 ‘ISLANDER ’IDENTITIES: THE CASE of HEYBELIADA and BURGAZADA ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on the identity construction through ‘living on an island ’in two of the Prince Islands, Heybeliada and Burgazada in Istanbul. DraWing on in-depth intervieWs with the inhabitants of both islands, it examines the meanings attached to the island and everyday spaces and practices through Which identities are negotiated by various groups. An examination of the interrelations betWeen theories of place and island studies is central to the research. The focus of the research is to analyze Heybeliada and Burgazada as places of belonging and identity, and examine the changing relations betWeen the Islands and the mainland Istanbul. Prince Islands, Which have been a center of attention as one of the most preferred excursion places in Istanbul, have also attracted considerable interest lately due to the ongoing discussions on various issues ranging from urban planning, mass tourism, transportation, conservation, and animal rights, to the right to health and natural disasters. Another aim of the thesis is to uncover how all these issues affect the construction and negotiation of belonging and transform the meanings attached to the island. Methodologically, the thesis employs a multi-scalar and relational approach to space, place and belonging, examining identities with reference not only to the ‘island ’as a physical place and an imaginary construct, but also to the domestic and public spaces in Which inhabitants spend their everyday lives. Keywords: island, identity, islander identity, belonging, place, Heybeliada, Burgazada, Prince Islands 2 ADALILIK KİMLİĞİ: HEYBELİADA ve BURGAZADA ÖRNEKLERİ ÜZERİNDEN BİR ARAŞTIRMA ÖZET Bu tez, İstanbul’daki Prens Adaları’ndan ikisi olan Heybeliada ve Burgazada’da, ‘adada yaşamak ’kavramı temelinde kurulan kimlik inşasına odaklanmaktadır. Bu iki adada yaşayan kişiler ile yapılan etraflı röportajlardan yararlanarak, adayla ve günlük yaşam alanlarıyla ilişkilendirilen anlamlar araştırılmış; adada yaşayan farklı grupların kimliklerini günlük pratikler aracılığıyla nasıl müzakere ettiği incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın merkezinde mekân teorileri ile ada çalışmaları arasındaki karşılıklı ilişkilerin incelenmesi yer almaktadır. Araştırmanın odak noktası; Heybeliada ve Burgazada'yı aidiyet ve kimlikle ilişkili alanlar olarak analiz ederek, Adalar ile anakara İstanbul arasındaki değişen ilişkileri araştırmaktır. İstanbul'un