DOCSLIB.ORG

History of Steel Processing Andrew Ruble Department of Materials Science & Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History of Steel Processing Andrew Ruble Department of Materials Science & Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 History of Steel Processing Andrew Ruble Department of Materials Science & Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 Abstract Although primitive furnaces could make use of iron ore, early cast and wrought iron production methods were time consuming and unpredictable, since the chemistry was not well understood. The important chemistry behind iron processing lies with oxygen and carbon reducing iron ore, as well as oxygen removing solid carbon as a gas. As the landscape of steelmaking began to develop, these reactions were understood and utilized to develop processing methods that produced high quality steel in large amounts. Use of a blast furnace reduced the iron ore, and methods like puddling, the Bessemer process, the open-hearth furnace, and the basic oxygen process were used to manipulate the carbon and oxygen reactions to their advantage. Scrap steel could also be incorporated such as seen in an electric arc furnace. Module Objectives The objective of the module is to introduce methods of iron processing. The thought process and chemistry behind each method are shown to familiarize students with real world application of chemical reactions. Students will be able to discuss each processing method, how new methods improve the steelmaking process, and the chemistry behind each new method. Student Learning Objectives The student will be able to Recognize the chemistry necessary for iron processing Differentiate between iron processing methods Describe the current landscape of iron processing 1 MatEd Core Competencies Covered: 7. A Identify the General Nature of Metals 7.I Explain Causes for Differing Materials Properties 9.B Define and Describe Types and Properties of Cast Iron 17.B Describe Techniques used for Metals Processing Key Words: Iron, Steel, Processing Type: PowerPoint presentation with short online activity and class discussion Time required: one class period Suggested prerequisite: Iron and Steel: Properties and Application Target grade level: High School; also Introductory College/Technical School Equipment and Supplies Needed PowerPoint projection system Table of Contents: Abstract 1 Module Objectives 1 Student Learning Objectives 1 MatEd Core Competencies 2 Equipment and Supplies 2 Curriculum Overview 3 Module Procedure 6 Optional Student Activity 8 Supporting Materials 8 Acknowledgements 8 Evaluation 8 2 Curriculum Overview The history of iron processing, and therefore steel processing, demonstrates civilization’s demand for a versatile engineering material and the creativity of the engineers of the time. Iron’s high strength and ductility made it much more useful than the brittle materials of history such as wood and ceramic but required a greater scientific understanding and greater technology to implement. Early metallurgists did not understand phase relationships or even concepts of the atom, so processing iron ore was difficult. Small steps in understanding the chemistry led to new processes that allow control over the quality of iron and steel produced while maximizing quantity and quality. Early metallurgists were familiar with melting copper, so they attempted to melt the iron ore they found. The primitive furnaces, which could melt copper due to its low melting temperature of about 1100 degrees C (around 2000 degrees F), were not able to liquefy the iron ore, which melts just above 1500 degrees C (2700 degrees F). With enough time, however, in a charcoal furnace, iron ore would heat up to form a semi-malleable mass which could be hammered and shaped. This took a lot of time and energy, and the product was called wrought iron (wrought meaning worked). Impurities present were worked out by hammering although many still remained, leading to low performance and inconsistency among wrought iron pieces. Each piece needed to be worked individually, which was time consuming. This technique did not oust bronze as the leading metal of the day but it was a step towards the utilization of iron. The production of wrought iron is a great example of conceptual understanding coming much later than the discovery. Iron ore exists mostly as an oxide, Fe2O3, which is not suitable for any application, but when it is heated with charcoal (carbon) and air (oxygen), the iron ore and carbon monoxide reduce to form iron and carbon dioxide. This is the main reaction that was slowly understood over time by metallurgists and it is important to remember: 2C + 02 -> 2CO Fe203 + 3CO -> 2Fe + 3CO2 The reaction between the carbon C and oxygen gas O2 form carbon monoxide CO, which also produces a lot of heat. This is very important as it removes carbon from the iron by turning it into a gas. This carbon monoxide reacts with iron ore Fe2O3, reducing it to pure iron Fe and carbon dioxide CO2 as a gas. As furnace temperatures increased with advances in technology and chemistry, metallurgists were eventually able to fully melt iron to produce cast iron. Since the metal is molten, it can then be ‘cast’ into shapes. As you can see in the phase diagram below, the melting point of iron is lowered significantly as carbon content increases from – for pure iron to – at 4% C. The first cast iron was produced near this point, which allowed the early furnaces to melt it completely. However, once cooled, this material was brittle due to the 3 high carbon percentage. Often, the liquid metal was cast into manageable shapes, such as bars, to be remelted and processed separately from the furnace. This temporary state of the iron is known as pig iron, mostly characterized by its high carbon percentage. Figure 1: Phase diagram of iron and carbon. Notice the lowered melting temperature around 4% carbon. This processing of iron ore to pig iron was done using a blast furnace. The blast furnace is a tall cylindrical structure which utilizes a continuous process where a combination of iron ore and fuel (such as coke) are inserted into the top of a furnace while air is pumped in from the bottom. The air rises and reacts with the fuel, using the above reactions, reducing the iron ore. Molten iron then flows out the bottom, where it is cast into bars for pig iron. This process needs to be running continuously so blast furnaces often run for many years at a time, and are very difficult to stop and start. As pure oxygen became available, using pre-heated oxygen dramatically improved the pig iron quality and output. One technique for using pig iron was known as puddling. Since no more carbon needed to be added to the iron to decrease the melting temperature, a fuel source was ignited separately from the pig iron to avoid any more additions of carbon or other elements from the fuel to the iron. The heat was directed onto the pig iron, which was melted and combined with iron ore, creating the above combustion and reduction reactions, removing carbon and other contaminates. As the carbon was removed, the melting temperature of the iron increased, effectively solidifying iron with a lower carbon content. The iron 4 solidified into lumps which were extracted. This could be shaped into bars, creating a product similar to wrought iron but without the hammering. While there were a few early techniques for producing steel, none really worked until Henry Bessemer come up with his technique known as the Bessemer process in the 1850s. Bessemer created a process where air was bubbled up from the bottom through a vessel of molten iron. One might think that this would cool the iron, but the forced air was a better source of oxygen than adding iron ore (like puddling). The added oxygen removed the carbon impurities and created large amounts of heat, which would sustain high temperatures in the molten iron, allowing all the carbon to be removed. This new method took only about 20 minutes and completely revolutionized the steel industry, cutting the price of steel more than 75% and increasing steel production tremendously. This steel was very useful, but since the Bessemer process used air, the iron was exposed to nitrogen which caused steel to be somewhat brittle. A more advanced version of puddling used a new invention called the open hearth furnace, a furnace designed to reuse heat from escaping gas. Similar to puddling, the open hearth furnace was heated separately to avoid any contaminants but, instead of coke, used natural gas, which burns near 2000 degrees C to heat the furnace. Combining the new furnace design with gas allowed the furnace to reach and maintain high temperatures, easily melting pig iron and even scrap steel, which was starting to become prevalent. Once the steel was melted, the chemistry was altered until the desired composition was reached. Since the chemistry was carefully controlled, the operators did not need to wait for the iron to solidify, such as in puddling; the iron could be poured out immediately. Each batch took about 8 hours to complete. The open hearth furnace did not replace the Bessemer process, but complemented by using large amounts of scrap steel. When pure oxygen became commercially available, it replaced air in the Bessemer process and, along with some other improvements, became known as the basic oxygen process, and was widely used starting in the 1950s. Often, molten iron direct from the blast furnace could be used. In the basic oxygen process, high pressure oxygen is blown into the steel, either from the top or bottom, which removes carbon while also producing heat to keep the iron molten. Along with adding a few extras, such as limestone and magnesium to remove other impurities, this method produced very high quality steel, up to 350 tons in 40 minutes. Using mostly pig iron, the basic oxygen process did not allow use of large amounts of scrap steel. Some scrap could be used, but scrap was still mostly processed with the open hearth furnace.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wear Behavior of Austempered and Quenched and Tempered Gray Cast Irons Under Similar Hardness
    metals Article Wear Behavior of Austempered and Quenched and Tempered Gray Cast Irons under Similar Hardness 1,2 2 2 2, , Bingxu Wang , Xue Han , Gary C. Barber and Yuming Pan * y 1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China; [email protected] 2 Automotive Tribology Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA; [email protected] (X.H.); [email protected] (G.C.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Current address: 201 N. Squirrel Rd Apt 1204, Auburn Hills, MI 48326, USA. y Received: 14 November 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 8 December 2019 Abstract: In this research, an austempering heat treatment was applied on gray cast iron using various austempering temperatures ranging from 232 ◦C to 371 ◦C and holding times ranging from 1 min to 120 min. The microstructure and hardness were examined using optical microscopy and a Rockwell hardness tester. Rotational ball-on-disk sliding wear tests were carried out to investigate the wear behavior of austempered gray cast iron samples and to compare with conventional quenched and tempered gray cast iron samples under equivalent hardness. For the austempered samples, it was found that acicular ferrite and carbon saturated austenite were formed in the matrix. The ferritic platelets became coarse when increasing the austempering temperature or extending the holding time. Hardness decreased due to a decreasing amount of martensite in the matrix. In wear tests, austempered gray cast iron samples showed slightly higher wear resistance than quenched and tempered samples under similar hardness while using the austempering temperatures of 232 ◦C, 260 ◦C, 288 ◦C, and 316 ◦C and distinctly better wear resistance while using the austempering temperatures of 343 ◦C and 371 ◦C.
    [Show full text]
  • Society, Materials, and the Environment: the Case of Steel
    metals Review Society, Materials, and the Environment: The Case of Steel Jean-Pierre Birat IF Steelman, Moselle, 57280 Semécourt, France; [email protected]; Tel.: +333-8751-1117 Received: 1 February 2020; Accepted: 25 February 2020; Published: 2 March 2020 Abstract: This paper reviews the relationship between the production of steel and the environment as it stands today. It deals with raw material issues (availability, scarcity), energy resources, and generation of by-products, i.e., the circular economy, the anthropogenic iron mine, and the energy transition. The paper also deals with emissions to air (dust, Particulate Matter, heavy metals, Persistant Organics Pollutants), water, and soil, i.e., with toxicity, ecotoxicity, epidemiology, and health issues, but also greenhouse gas emissions, i.e., climate change. The loss of biodiversity is also mentioned. All these topics are analyzed with historical hindsight and the present understanding of their physics and chemistry is discussed, stressing areas where knowledge is still lacking. In the face of all these issues, technological solutions were sought to alleviate their effects: many areas are presently satisfactorily handled (the circular economy—a historical’ practice in the case of steel, energy conservation, air/water/soil emissions) and in line with present environmental regulations; on the other hand, there are important hanging issues, such as the generation of mine tailings (and tailings dam failures), the emissions of greenhouse gases (the steel industry plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050, at least in the EU), and the emission of fine PM, which WHO correlates with premature deaths. Moreover, present regulatory levels of emissions will necessarily become much stricter.
    [Show full text]
  • Schoolcraft Blast Furnace
    Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Schoolcraft National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Blast Furnace Schoolcraft furnace With surveyor William Burt’s discovery of iron ore near Teal Lake in Marquette County in 1844, Michigan’s Upper Peninsula suddenly became a hub of activity. The discovery led to construction of a vast mining and manufacturing industry using forges and blast furnaces. When the Civil War ended, many of the South’s furnaces had been destroyed by the war. Westward expansion was occurring across the plains and demand for iron boomed. It was during this era that many of the Upper Peninsula’s furnaces were constructed. There were advantages to smelting iron ore from charcoal fires. Iron produced in this manner was low in carbon content, making it highly fusable, strong, malleable and able to withstand shocks without cracking. The iron made fine wagon rims, horseshoes, and railroad wheels. Before the boom times were over, 29 separate furnaces were located on the Old Munising, ca. 1870 peninsula, though not all operated simultaneously. The business of iron making required more capital than was readily available in the area and financing and management of the operations was often complex. The first group of investors were from Philadelphia. They wished to develop a resort village on Munising Bay’s east shoreline in 1850. Some 87,000 acres of timber were purchased for $.85 an acre. A village was platted on the east shore of Munising Bay, lots were sold, and a dock was built. Henry Mather and Peter White acted as agents for the group of investors who created the Schoolcraft Iron Company in 1866.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Carburization Time and Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Carburized Mild Steel, Using Activated Carbon As Carburizer
    Materials Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, 483-487, 2009 © 2009 Effects of Carburization Time and Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Carburized Mild Steel, Using Activated Carbon as Carburizer Fatai Olufemi Aramidea,*, Simeon Ademola Ibitoyeb, Isiaka Oluwole Oladelea, Joseph Olatunde Borodea aMetallurgical and Materials Engineering Department, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria bMaterials Science and Engineering Department, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria Received: July 31, 2009; Revised: September 25, 2009 Due to the complexity of controlling parameters in carburization, there has been relatively little work on process variables during the surface hardening process. This work focuses on the effects of the carburizing temperature and time on the mechanical properties of mild steel carburized with activated carbon, at 850, 900 and 950 °C, soaked at the carburizing temperature for 15 and 30 minutes, quenched in oil, tempered at 550 °C and held for 60 minutes. Prior carburization process, standard test samples were prepared from the as received specimen for tensile and impact tests. After carburization process, the test samples were subjected to the standard test and from the data obtained, ultimate tensile strength, engineering strain, impact strength, Youngs’ moduli were calculated. The case and core hardness of the carburized tempered samples were measured. It was observed that the mechanical properties of mild steels were found to be strongly influenced by the process of carburization, carburizing temperature and soaking time at carburizing temperature. It was concluded that the optimum combination of mechanical properties is achieved at the carburizing temperature of 900 °C followed by oil quenching and tempering at 550 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher-Quality Electric-Arc Furnace Steel
    ACADEMIC PULSE Higher-Quality Electric-Arc Furnace Steel teelmakers have traditionally viewed Research Continues to Improve the electric arc furnaces (EAFs) as unsuitable Quality of Steel for producing steel with the highest- Even with continued improvements to the Squality surface finish because the process design of steelmaking processes, the steelmaking uses recycled steel instead of fresh iron. With over research community has focused their attention 100 years of processing improvements, however, on the fundamental materials used in steelmaking EAFs have become an efficient and reliable in order to improve the quality of steel. In my lab steelmaking alternative to integrated steelmaking. In at Carnegie Mellon University, we have several fact, steel produced in a modern-day EAF is often research projects that deal with controlling the DR. P. BILLCHRIS MAYER PISTORIUS indistinguishable from what is produced with the impurity concentration and chemical quality of POSCOManaging Professor Editorof Materials integrated blast-furnace/oxygen-steelmaking route. steel produced in EAFs. Science412-306-4350 and Engineering [email protected] Mellon University Improvements in design, coupled with research For example, we recently used mathematical developments in metallurgy, mean high-quality steel modeling to explore ways to control produced quickly and energy-efficiently. phosphorus. Careful regulation of temperature, slag and stirring are needed to produce low- Not Your (Great-) Grandparent’s EAF phosphorus steel. We analyzed data from Especially since the mid-1990s, there have been operating furnaces and found that, in many significant improvements in the design of EAFs, cases, the phosphorus removal reaction could which allow for better-functioning burners and a proceed further.
    [Show full text]
  • ITP Metal Casting: Advanced Melting Technologies
    Advanced Melting Technologies: Energy Saving Concepts and Opportunities for the Metal Casting Industry November 2005 BCS, Incorporated 5550 Sterrett Place, Suite 306 Columbia, MD 21044 www.bcs-hq.com Advanced Melting Technologies: Energy Saving Concepts and Opportunities for the Metal Casting Industry Prepared for ITP Metal Casting by BCS, Incorporated November 2005 Acknowledgments This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers from University of Missouri–Rolla, Case Western Reserve University, and Carnegie Mellon University with BCS, Incorporated as the project coordinator and lead. The research findings for the nonferrous casting industry were contributed by Dr. Jack Wallace and Dr. David Schwam, while the ferrous melting technologies were addressed by Dr. Kent Peaslee and Dr. Richard Fruehan. BCS, Incorporated researched independently to provide an overview of the melting process and the U.S. metal casting industry. The final report was prepared by Robert D. Naranjo, Ji-Yea Kwon, Rajita Majumdar, and William T. Choate of BCS, Incorporated. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of the U.S. Department of Energy and Cast Metal Coalition (CMC) in conducting this study. Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an Agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any Agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any Agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Sirhowy Ironworks
    Great Archaeological Sites in Blaenau Gwent 5. SIRHOWY IRONWORKS There were a number of ironworks in the area now covered by Blaenau Gwent County Borough, which provided all the raw materials they needed – iron ore, limestone and fuel, charcoal at first but later coal to make coke. The Sirhowy ironworks (SO14301010) are the only one where there is still something to see. The works were opened in 1778 with one blast furnace. Although it was originally blown by water power, in 1799 the owners invested in a Boulton and Watt steam engine. This gave them enough power to blow a second furnace, which started production in 1802. In the early years of the 19th century, the pig iron produced at Sirhowy was sent to the Tredegar works a little further down the valley where it was refined, until 1818 when the Sirhowy works were sold and started to send its pig iron to Ebbw Vale. A third furnace was added in 1826 and a fourth in 1839. But by the 1870s iron smelting at Sirhowy was no longer profitable, and the works finally closed in 1882. Like all ironworks in South Wales, the furnaces were built against a steep bank which enabled the ironworkers to load the charge of iron ore, limestone and coke or charcoal fuel more easily at the top of the furnace. All that is now left now are the remains of a bank of blast furnaces with the arches that would originally have linked them to the casting houses in front, and the building that originally housed the waterwheel.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property
    NFS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multipler Propertyr ' Documentation Form NATIONAL This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ____Iron and Steel Resources of Pennsylvania, 1716-1945_______________ B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________ ~ ___Pennsylvania Iron and Steel Industry. 1716-1945_________________ C. Geographical Data Commonwealth of Pennsylvania continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, J hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requiremerytS\set forth iri36JCFR PafrfsBOfcyid the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature of certifying official Date / Brent D. Glass Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple
    [Show full text]
  • Three Hundred Years of Assaying American Iron and Iron Ores
    Bull. Hist. Chem, 17/18 (1995) 41 THREE HUNDRED YEARS OF ASSAYING AMERICAN IRON AND IRON ORES Kvn K. Oln, WthArt It can reasonably be argued that of all of the industries factors were behind this development; increased pro- that made the modern world possible, iron and steel cess sophistication, a better understanding of how im- making holds a pivotal place. Without ferrous metals purities affected iron quality, increased capital costs, and technology, much of the modem world simply would a generation of chemically trained metallurgists enter- not exist. As the American iron industry grew from the ing the industry. This paper describes the major advances isolated iron plantations of the colonial era to the com- in analytical development. It also describes how the plex steel mills of today, the science of assaying played 19th century iron industry serves as a model for the way a critical role. The assayer gave the iron maker valu- an expanding industry comes to rely on analytical data able guidance in the quest for ever improving quality for process control. and by 1900 had laid down a theoretical foundation for the triumphs of steel in our own century. 1500's to 1800 Yet little is known about the assayer and how his By the mid 1500's the operating principles of assay labo- abilities were used by industry. Much has been written ratories were understood and set forth in the metallurgi- about the ironmaster and the furnace workers. Docents cal literature. Agricola's Mtll (1556), in period dress host historic ironmaking sites and inter- Biringuccio's rthn (1540), and the pret the lives of housewives, miners, molders, clerks, rbrbühln (Assaying Booklet, anon.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Bessemer and the Mass Production of Steel
    Henry Bessemer and the Mass Production of Steel Englishmen, Sir Henry Bessemer (1813-1898) invented the first process for mass-producing steel inexpensively, essential to the development of skyscrapers. Modern steel is made using technology based on Bessemer's process. Bessemer was knighted in 1879 for his contribution to science. The "Bessemer Process" for mass-producing steel, was named after Bessemer. Bessemer's famous one-step process for producing cheap, high-quality steel made it possible for engineers to envision transcontinental railroads, sky-scraping office towers, bay- spanning bridges, unsinkable ships, and mass-produced horseless carriages. The key principle is removal of impurities from the iron by oxidation with air being blown through the molten iron. The oxidation also raises the temperature of the iron mass and keeps it molten. In the U.S., where natural resources and risk-taking investors were abundant, giant Bessemer steel mills sprung up to drive the expanding nation's rise as a dominant world economic and industrial leader. Why Steel? Steel is the most widely used of all metals, with uses ranging from concrete reinforcement in highways and in high-rise buildings to automobiles, aircraft, and vehicles in space. Steel is more ductile (able to deform without breakage) and durable than cast iron and is generally forged, rolled, or drawn into various shapes. The Bessemer process revolutionized steel manufacture by decreasing its cost. The process also decreased the labor requirements for steel-making. Prior to its introduction, steel was far too expensive to make bridges or the framework for buildings and thus wrought iron had been used throughout the Industrial Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10 Long Title.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15382-9 - Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism and British Identity, 1750-1914 Christine MacLeod Index More information Index Acade´mie des Sciences 80, 122, 357 arms manufacturers 236–9 Adam, Robert 346 Armstrong, William, Baron Armstrong of Adams, John Couch 369 Cragside Aikin, John 43, 44, 71 arms manufacturer 220 Airy, Sir George 188, 360 as hero of industry 332 Albert, Prince 24, 216, 217, 231, 232, 260 concepts of invention 268, 269, 270 Alfred, King 24 entrepreneurial abilities of 328 Amalgamated Society of Engineers, knighted 237–8 Machinists, Millwrights, Smiths and monument to 237 Pattern Makers 286–7 opposition to patent system 250, 267–8 ancestor worship, see idolatry portrait of 230 Anderson’s Institution, Glasgow 113, 114, president of BAAS 355 288, 289 Punch’s ‘Lord Bomb’ 224–5 Arago, Franc¸ois 122, 148, 184 Ashton, T. S. 143 Eloge, to James Watt 122–3, 127 Athenaeum, The 99–101, 369 Arkwright, Sir Richard, Atkinson, T. L. 201 and scientific training 359 Atlantic telegraph cables 243, 245, 327 as national benefactor 282 Arthur, King 15 as workers’ hero 286 Askrill, Robert 213 commemorations of, 259 Associated Society of Locomotive Cromford mills, painting of 63 Engineers and Firemen 288 enterprise of 196, 327, 329 era of 144 Babbage, Charles 276, 353, 356–7, factory system 179 375, 383 in Erasmus Darwin’s poetry 67–8 Bacon, Sir Francis in Maria Edgeworth’s book 171 as discoverer 196 in Samuel Smiles’ books 255, 256 as genius 51, 53, 142 invention of textile machinery 174, 176 bust of 349 knighthood 65 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Distortion in Case Carburized Components- the Steelmakers View
    Heat Treating: Proceedings of the 18th Conference Copyright © 1999 ASM International® Ronald A. Wallis, Harry W. Walton, editors, p 5-11 All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1361/cp1998ht005 www.asminternational.org Distortion in Case Carburized Components­ The Steel makers View M. Cristinacce British Steel Engineering Steels Rotherham, United Kingdom 1. Abstract NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) is becoming of increasing importance in the automotive industry. The control Distortion of components during heat treatment has a of distortion to give correct mating of rotating components significant effect upon final component costs. The factors such as gears and shafts has a major influence upon NVH which influence distortion behaviour occur during the performance. machining and heat treatment processes and are therefore Most of the examples given in this paper are automotive outside the control of the steelmaker. One important factor transmission components which are carburised. which is under the control of the steelmaker is hardenability ­ A wide variety of factors influence distortion behaviour Consistent hardenability performance can have a significant and can be broadly summarised as follows: effect in reducing the variability in distortion. In a number of Component shape. instances it has been shown that the macrostructure and Steel type. as-cast shape of the steel can also influence distortion. Other Microstructure and residual stresses prior to heat downstream processing effects such as forging may also be treatment. influential in these circumstances. Reheating and carburising conditions. This paper gives examples of some of the experiences of Stacking and support in furnace. British Steel Engineering Steels with customers and end users, Quenching - Medium, temperature, flow, jigging, etc.
    [Show full text]