DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetics Society News

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JULY 2018 | ISSUE 79 GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS In this issue The Genetics Society News is edited by Lynsey Hall and items for future issues • Edinburgh Alliance for Complex Trait Genetics - SIG in the spotlight can be sent to the editor by email to • Alternative Careers Pathways for ECR [email protected]. • Research and travel grant reports The Newsletter is published twice a year, • Meeting Announcements with copy dates of July and January. Cover image: Darwinian finches demonstrating adaptive evolution as part of The Genetics Society Autumn Meeting. See page 4 for details. A WORD FROM THE EDITOR A word from the editor Welcome to Issue 79 Dear Readers, career paths outwith the traditional academic route Welcome to the latest addition of for biomedical academics. the Genetics Society newsletter. This article was suggested by Since the last newsletter the our new President, Laurence Society has predominantly been Hurst, who is very passionate busy organizing an exciting about supporting early career programme of events in the run researchers in exploring a range up to our Centenary celebration of opportunities. year next year, more details of which can be found in the Whilst 2019 is an important Features section. year for the Society, 2018 is an important year for genetics as Another feature article in this it marks 100 years since the issue continues our Sectional publication of R.A. Fisher’s Interest Group in the spotlight famous 1918 Paper on the theory series, this issue focussing on the of quantitative trait inheritance. Edinburgh Alliance for Complex in Edinburgh and the Genetics Trait Genetics. As such, there are several Society in the UK. Details of exciting scientific meetings these meetings can be found In this issue, I would like to we are sponsoring this under Genetics Society Scientific draw your attention to a special year, including 100 years of Meetings. guest feature by Vitae - the quantitative genetics theory global leader in supporting and its applications: celebrating I hope you enjoy this issue, and the professional and career the centenary of Fisher 1918 all of the reports on the various development of researchers, and A Century of Genetics – research and meetings which we which outlines alternative Celebrating 100 years of genetics have been delighted to fund. 2018 is an important year for genetics as it marks 100 years since the publication of R.A. Fisher’s famous 1918 Paper on the theory of quantitative trait inheritance. 2 . GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS . ISSUE 79 ISSUE 79 . July 2018 For more details please contact: The Genetics Society Charles Darwin House 12 Roger Street London CONTENTS WC1N 2JU Switchboard: +44 0203 793 7850 Email: [email protected] Web: www.genetics.org.uk Meeting Announcements 4 - 6 The Genetics Society Journals 2018 Genetics Society Autumn Meeting Heredity Genetics Society Scientific Meetings www.nature.com/hdy External Meetings Diary Editor-in-Chief: Prof Barbara Mable Heredity Editorial Office, University of Glasgow, Sectional Interest Groups 7 Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland Genetics Society Business 8 - 12 Genes and Development www.genesdev.org Honorary Secretary’s Notices Editor: Dr T. Grodzicker Heredity Podcast Genes & Development, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 500 Sunnyside Boulevard, Woodbury, New York, 11797, USA Obituaries 13 - 15 Committee members Features 16 - 28 Alternative Career Trajectories in the Biomedical Sciences President Prof Laurence D. Hurst, University of Bath Genetics Society Centenary events Presidential handover Vice-Presidents Edinburgh Alliance for Complex Trait Genetics - SIG in the spotlight Prof Malcolm Logan, King’s College London Prof Colum Walsh, University of Ulster Science Communication with the Genetics Society Prof Alison Woollard, University of Oxford Travel Reports 29 - 33 Honorary Secretary Dr Jonathan Pettitt, University of Aberdeen Heredity Fieldwork Grant Report 34 - 36 Honorary Treasurer Training Grants 38 - 39 Prof Martin Taylor, University of Edinburgh Genetics Society One-off Meetings 40 - 44 Scientific Meetings Secretary Dr Marika Charalambous, King’s College London Grant Schemes 45 - 49 Newsletter Editor General Information 50 Dr Lynsey Hall, Cardiff University Contacting the Genetics Society 51 Website Editor Dr Kay Boulton, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh Policy Officer Prof Rebecca Oakey, King’s College London Postgraduate Representative Ms Helena Wells, Kings College London Ordinary Committee Members Gene Structure, function and regulation Dr Aziz Aboobaker, University of Oxford Dr Douglas Vernimmen, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh Genomics Dr Michael Simpson, King’s College London Dr Sudhakaran Prabakaran, University of Cambridge Cell and Develomental Genetics Prof Stefan Hoppler, University of Aberdeen Applied and Quantitative Genetics Dr Lindsey Leach, University of Birmingham Dr Alastair Wilson, University of Exeter Evolutionary, ecological and population genetics Dr Frank Hailer, Cardiff University Prof Jason Wolf, University of Bath Corporate Genetics and Biotechnology Dr Jim Huggett, University of Surrey and LGC Teddington Dr Alison Bentley, The National Institute of Agricultural Botany Design and Print Collaborate Agency www.collaborate.agency Advertising in Genetics Society News represents an opportunity to reach a large community of professional geneticists. For rates please email [email protected] www.genetics.org.uk . 3 2018 Genetics Society Autumn Meeting Genotype to Phenotype to Fitness 22–23 November 2018, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus This meeting will bring together researchers working with Speakers diverse genetic techniques, across a multitude of systems, Matthew Webster Uppsala University, Sweden) but who are nonetheless connected by a shared passion for Nina Wedell University of Exeter understanding adaptive evolution. Patrik Nosil University of Sheffield The meeting will have four themed, open sessions, each Susan Johnston University of Edinburgh featuring 2-3 of our invited speakers, together with Edze Westra University of Exeter contributed talks and posters selected from submitted Chris Jiggins University of Cambridge abstracts. In addition to the open sessions, there will be a Anne Charmantier CEFE - CNRS, Montpellier, France symposium offering opportunities for early career researchers Miltos Tsiantis MPI for Plant Breeding, Cologne to present in an especially supportive environment. The open Katrina McGuigan University of Queensland, Australia session themes will be: Walter Salzburger University of Basel, Switzerland Genotype to phenotype Genetics constraint and conflict Scientific Organisers Genes in environments Alastair Wilson University of Exeter Micro to macro, bridging evolutionary genetic scales. Kay Boulton Roslin Institute Frank Hailer Cardiff University We encourage everyone to interpret these themes broadly - they are intended to help identify common ground for Helena Wells King’s College, London discussion, not to limit scientific scope! Ben Longdon University of Exeter Abstract Submission Deadline: 31st August 2018 for registration, visit www.genetics.org.uk/events/genotype-to-phenotype-to-fitness GENETICS SOCIETY 5 SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS Speakers Matthew Webster Uppsala University, Sweden) Nina Wedell University of Exeter More detailed information and links to event websites can be found at Patrik Nosil University of Sheffield Susan Johnston University of Edinburgh www.genetics.org.uk/events_categories/conferences/ Edze Westra University of Exeter Chris Jiggins University of Cambridge 100 years of quantitative genetics theory and A Century of Genetics – Celebrating 100 Anne Charmantier CEFE - CNRS, Montpellier, France its applications: celebrating the centenary of years of genetics in Edinburgh and the Miltos Tsiantis MPI for Plant Breeding, Cologne Fisher 1918 Genetics Society in the UK Katrina McGuigan University of Queensland, Australia Date: 9th October 2018 Date: 13th - 15th November 2018 Walter Salzburger University of Basel, Switzerland Location: Royal College of Surgeons, Location: Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh Nicholson St., Edinburgh Registration deadline: Further details to follow Scientific Organisers Registration deadline: 21st September 2018 Website: www.genetics.org.uk/events/100-years- Alastair Wilson University of Exeter Abstract deadline: 10th August 2018 genetics/ Kay Boulton Roslin Institute Website: www.genetics.org.uk/events/100-years-of- Frank Hailer Cardiff University quantitative-genetics-theory-and-its-applications- celebrating-the-centenary-of-fisher-1918/ Helena Wells King’s College, London Info: This one-day meeting will celebrate the centennial Ben Longdon University of Exeter of R.A. Fisher’s famous 1918 Paper on the theory of quantitative trait inheritance. There will be 8 invited speakers, with the Fisher Memorial Lecture at 5pm, Abstract Submission Deadline: 31st August 2018 followed by a reception. In addition, 4 early career speakers and up to 30 posters will be selected from submitted abstracts by the organizing committee. REGISTER FOR MORE GENETIC SOCIETY EVENTS AT: www.genetics.org.uk www.genetics.org.uk . 5 EXTERNAL MEETINGS DIARY 6 More detailed information and links to event Galton Institute conference on genome editing websites can be found at Date: 31st October 2018 http://www.genetics.org.uk/events_categories/ Location: The Royal Society, external-meetings/ 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London Registration info: Attendance free but strictly We will happily include
Recommended publications
  • Uniprot at EMBL-EBI's Role in CTTV

    Uniprot at EMBL-EBI's Role in CTTV

    Barbara P. Palka, Daniel Gonzalez, Edd Turner, Xavier Watkins, Maria J. Martin, Claire O’Donovan European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK UniProt at EMBL-EBI’s role in CTTV: contributing to improved disease knowledge Introduction The mission of UniProt is to provide the scientific community with a The Centre for Therapeutic Target Validation (CTTV) comprehensive, high quality and freely accessible resource of launched in Dec 2015 a new web platform for life- protein sequence and functional information. science researchers that helps them identify The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) is the central hub for the collection of therapeutic targets for new and repurposed medicines. functional information on proteins, with accurate, consistent and rich CTTV is a public-private initiative to generate evidence on the annotation. As much annotation information as possible is added to each validity of therapeutic targets based on genome-scale experiments UniProtKB record and this includes widely accepted biological ontologies, and analysis. CTTV is working to create an R&D framework that classifications and cross-references, and clear indications of the quality of applies to a wide range of human diseases, and is committed to annotation in the form of evidence attribution of experimental and sharing its data openly with the scientific community. CTTV brings computational data. together expertise from four complementary institutions: GSK, Biogen, EMBL-EBI and Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. UniProt’s disease expert curation Q5VWK5 (IL23R_HUMAN) This section provides information on the disease(s) associated with genetic variations in a given protein. The information is extracted from the scientific literature and diseases that are also described in the OMIM database are represented with a controlled vocabulary.
  • Gabriel Dover)

    Gabriel Dover)

    Dear Mr Darwin (Gabriel Dover) Home | Intro | About | Feedback | Prev | Next | Search Steele: Lamarck's Was Signature Darwin Wrong? Molecular Drive: the Third Force in evolution Geneticist Gabriel Dover claims that there is a third force in evolution: 'Molecular Drive' beside natural selection and neutral drift. Molecular drive is operationally distinct from natural selection and neutral drift. According to Dover it explains biological phenomena, such as the 700 copies of a ribosomal RNA gene and the origin of the 173 legs of the centipede, which natural selection and neutral drift alone cannot explain. by Gert Korthof version 1.3 24 Mar 2001 Were Darwin and Mendel both wrong? Molecular Drive is, according to Dover, an important factor in evolution, because it shapes the genomes and forms of organisms. Therefore Neo-Darwinism is incomplete without Molecular Drive. It is no wonder that the spread of novel genes was ascribed to natural selection, because it was the only known process that could promote the spread of novel genes. Dover doesn't reject the existence of natural selection but points out cases where natural selection clearly fails as a mechanism. Molecular drive is a non-Darwinian mechanism because it is independent of selection. We certainly need forces in evolution, since natural selection itself is not a force. It is the passive outcome of other processes. It is not an active process, notwithstanding its name. Natural selection as an explanation is too powerful for its own good. Molecular drive is non-Mendelian because some DNA segments are multiplied disproportional. In Mendelian genetics genes are present in just two copies (one on the maternal and one on the paternal chromosome).
  • Download Program Guide

    Download Program Guide

    2011 C. elegans Meeting Organizing Committee Co-chairs: Oliver Hobert Columbia University Meera Sundaram University of Pennsylvania Organizing Committee: Raffi Aroian University of California, San Diego Ikue Mori Nagoya University Jean-Louis Bessereau INSERM Benjamin Podbilewicz Technion Israel Institute of Keith Blackwell Harvard Medical School Technology Andrew Chisholm University of California, San Diego Valerie Reinke Yale University Barbara Conradt Dartmouth Medical School Janet Richmond University of Illinois, Chicago Marie Anne Felix CNRS-Institut Jacques Monod Ann Rougvie University of Minnesota David Greenstein University of Minnesota Shai Shaham Rockefeller University Alla Grishok Columbia University Ahna Skop University of Wisconsin, Madison Craig Hunter Harvard University Ralf Sommer Max-Planck Institute for Bill Kelly Emory University Developmental Biology, Tuebingen Ed Kipreos University of Georgia Asako Sugimoto RIKEN, Kobe Todd Lamitina University of Pennsylvania Heidi Tissenbaum University of Massachusetts Chris Li City College of New York Medical School Sponsored by The Genetics Society of America 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998 telephone: (301) 634-7300 fax: (301) 634-7079 e-mail: [email protected] Web site: http:/www.genetics-gsa.org Front cover design courtesy of Ahna Skop 1 Table of Contents Schedule of All Events.....................................................................................................................4 Maps University of California, Los Angeles, Campus .....................................................................7
  • Completed Thesis

    Completed Thesis

    THE UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Human Uniqueness: Twenty-First Century Perspectives from Theology, Science and Archaeology Josephine Kiddle Bsc (Biology) MA (Religion) Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2013 This Thesis has been completed as a requirement for a postgraduate research degree of the University of Winchester. The word count is: 89350 THE UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER ABSTRACT FOR THESIS Human Uniqueness: Twenty-First Century Perspectives from Theology, Science and Archaeology A project aiming to establish, through the three disciplines, the value of human uniqueness as an integrating factor for science with theology Josephine Kiddle Bsc (Biology) MA (Religion) Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Doctor of Philosophy February 2013 The theme that underlies the thesis is the challenge presented by science, as it developed from the time of the Enlightenment through the centuries until the present day, to Christian theology. The consequent conflict of ideas is traced in respect of biological science and the traditions of Protestant Christian doctrine, together with the advances of the developing discipline of prehistoric archaeology since the early nineteenth century. The common ground from which disagreement stemmed was the existence of human beings and the uniqueness of the human species as a group amongst all other creatures. With the conflict arising from this challenge, centring on the origin and history of human uniqueness, a rift became established between the disciplines which widened as they progressed through to the twentieth century. It is this separation that the thesis takes up and endeavours to analyse in the light of the influence of advancing science on the blending of philosophical scientific ideas with the elements of Christian faith of former centuries.
  • Caenorhabditis Microbiota: Worm Guts Get Populated Laura C

    Caenorhabditis Microbiota: Worm Guts Get Populated Laura C

    Clark and Hodgkin BMC Biology (2016) 14:37 DOI 10.1186/s12915-016-0260-7 COMMENTARY Open Access Caenorhabditis microbiota: worm guts get populated Laura C. Clark and Jonathan Hodgkin* Please see related Research article: The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Gateway to a new host-microbiome model, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0258-1 effects on the life history of the worm are often profound Abstract [2]. It has been increasingly recognized that the worm Until recently, almost nothing has been known about microbiota is an important consideration in achieving a the natural microbiota of the model nematode naturalistic experimental model in which to study, for Caenorhabditis elegans. Reporting their research in instance, host–pathogen interactions or worm behavior. BMC Biology, Dirksen and colleagues describe the first Dirksen et al [3] present the first step towards under- sequencing effort to characterize the gut microbiota standing understanding the complex interactions of the of environmentally isolated C. elegans and the related natural worm microbiota by reporting a 16S rDNA-based taxa Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis “head count” of the bacterial population present in wild remanei In contrast to the monoxenic, microbiota-free nematode isolates (Fig. 1). Interestingly, it appears that cultures that are studied in hundreds of laboratories, it nematodes isolated from diverse natural environment- appears that natural populations of Caenorhabditis s—and even those that have been maintained for a short harbor distinct microbiotas. time on E. coli following isolation—share a “core” host- defined microbiota. This finding is in agreement with work by Berg et al.
  • From the President's Desk

    From the President's Desk

    JAN/FEB 2006 From the President’s desk: 2006, the 75th anniversary of the Genetics Society of America, will be marked by a number of initiatives to reinvigorate the Society’s mission of promoting research and education in genetics. A highlight was the recently held GSA sponsored conference, “Genetic Analysis: From Model Organisms to Human Biology” in San Diego from January 5-7. This conference emphasized the importance of model organism research by illustrating the crucial contributions to human biology resulting from discoveries in these organisms. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) supported this conference both financially and by participation of key NIH administrators, including Jeremy M. Berg, director of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. In addition to the superb science talks by international leaders the MOHB conference showcased other important and new GSA initiatives including education, public policy advocacy, graduate student support and recognition of outstanding model organism geneticists. Robin Wright, Education Committee chair, led a round table discussion on undergraduate education and the Joint Steering Committee for Public Policy and the Congressional Liaison Committee sponsored a session on science advocacy and public policy. There was a mentor lunch to support graduate students and postdocs in the next steps of their careers, and the three GSA medals were presented during the banquet, with Victor Ambros receiving the GSA Medal, Fred Sherman the Beadle Award, and Masatoshi Nei the Morgan Award. (For research highlights at the meeting, see pages 6 and 7 of this issue.) The 75th anniversary will also usher in changes to our society’s journal, GENETICS.
  • Genetics Society News

    Genetics Society News

    July 2008 . ISSUE 59 GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS www.genetics.org.uk IN THIS ISSUE Genetics Society News is edited by Steve Russell. Items for future issues should be sent to Steve Russell, preferably by email to • Genetics Society Epigenetics Meeting [email protected], or hard copy to Department of Genetics, • Genetics Society Sponsored Meetings University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH. The Newsletter is published twice a year, with copy dates of 1st June and • Travel, Fieldwork and Studentship Reports 26th November. • John Evans: an Appreciation Cocoons of the parasitoid wasp Cotesia vestalis on cabbage leaf in Taiwan. From the • Twelve Galton Lectures fieldwork report by Jetske G. de Boer on page 36. • My Favourite Paper A WORD FROM THE EDITOR A word from the editor ow soon until the $1000 based on the results of tests we genome is actually with barely understand! Here in the Hus and individual UK there is currently a sequencing is widespread? The moratorium, adhered to by publication of increasing most insurers, on the use of numbers of individual human genetic testing information for genome sequences suggests assessing life insurance that we should start to consider applications. It is important some of the implications that this remains in place and associated with the availability its effectiveness is reviewed of personal genetic well before the current information. In this issue we moratorium expires in 2011. present two articles reflecting The Human Genetics on his issue: a report from a Commission Genetics Society sponsored (http://www.hgc.gov.uk) meeting recently held in monitor issues relating to Cambridge organised by The genetic discrimination in the Triple Helix, an international UK and are a point of contact undergraduate organisation, as for those with any concerns in the Millennium Technology Prize.
  • Dissecting Dispensability

    Dissecting Dispensability

    NEWS AND VIEWS Dissecting dispensability Laurence D Hurst & Csaba Pál Like most organisms, yeast has relatively few genes that are necessary for viability. The presence of a duplicate gene elsewhere in the genome underpins many cases of dispensability. A new study suggests that the backup mechanism is more complex than previously assumed and requires feedback loops that ensure transcriptional upregulation of the duplicate. Four-fifths of yeast’s genes are not essential there is no relationship between the degree of The idea that the process involves active for viability1. This preponderance of dis- coexpression and the likelihood that a gene will reprogramming of transcription might lead pensable genes is observed in eukaryotes2,3 be dispensible11. Kafri et al. show that, in yeast, some to suggest that the process might be the and prokaryotes4,5, with only one known most duplicate-associated backup involves product of selection for dispensability. But this exception to date (the intracellular parasite genes that, on average, are not strongly coex- would be too hasty a conclusion. Isozymes are Mycoplasma genitalium)6. Many examples of pressed, do not share many similar 5′ motifs not maintained for key reactions in the meta- apparent dispensability may depend on the (that bind particular transcription factors) bolic network, suggesting that their retention specific conditions under which some genes and diverged from each other a long time ago. is not due to selection7. are required (conditions not normally seen in How can such genes be redundant but not the laboratory)7, but this explanation cannot coexpressed? Feedback loops and upregulation account for all cases.
  • PDF of Connecting Science's 2017

    PDF of Connecting Science's 2017

    Connecting Science Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1RQ wellcomegenomecampus.org/connectingscience Annual Review 2017/18 2 02 Contents DIRECTO R’S INTRODUCTION Connecting Science in twelve months 04 – 05 Global ambitions Have you had your say on your DNA? 10 – 1 1 Increasing global impact by tailoring training needs 12 – 13 Worm hunting in Colombia 14 – 16 Catalysing collaboration Bringing together scientific partners 20 – 21 First global event for genetic counsellors 22 – 23 Decoding genomes together 24 – 26 Snapshot: May 2017 to April 2018 27 – 32 Democratising genomics CONNECTING SCIENCE Blood, sweat and success – Implementing a gender balance policy 36 – 37 2017/18 ANNUAL REVIEW Science communication: remembering to listen 38 – 39 Exploring our world in the Genome Gallery 40 – 41 The mission of Connecting Science is simple: to enable team, the commitment and support of our many partners and everyone to explore genomic science and its impact on collaborators, and the financial support and encouragement research, health and society. Behind those simple words is of Wellcome. I am personally very thankful for all of those Wellcome Genome Campus: considerable complexity. The science itself is complex and things, and know that this support and energy often translates ever-changing, with new technologies being continually into life- or career-changing experiences for the tens of A hub of knowledge, learning, developed and put into practice in both research and thousands of people we engage with directly every year. healthcare. The work that we do is also deceptively and engagement complex, reaching audiences from primary schools to I hope that some of the stories highlighted in this Annual research scientists, NHS staff to patients and their families; Review give you a sense of the excitement we have in all Creating spaces for thinking 46 – 47 it spans the globe, and everything we do involves constant that we do.
  • The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories

    The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories

    Dartmouth College Dartmouth Digital Commons Dartmouth Scholarship Faculty Work 12-2008 The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories Michael R. Dietrich Dartmouth College Roberta L. Millstein University of California, Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa Part of the Biology Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Dartmouth Digital Commons Citation Dietrich, Michael R. and Millstein, Roberta L., "The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories" (2008). Dartmouth Scholarship. 1906. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/1906 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Work at Dartmouth Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dartmouth Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Dartmouth Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories Michael R. Dietrich and Roberta L. Millstein† The neutral and nearly neutral theories of molecular evolution are sometimes char- acterized as theories about drift alone, where drift is described solely as an outcome, rather than a process. We argue, however, that both selection and drift, as causal processes, are integral parts of both theories. However, the nearly neutral theory ex- plicitly recognizes alleles and/or molecular substitutions that, while engaging in weakly selected causal processes, exhibit outcomes thought to be characteristic of random drift. A narrow focus on outcomes obscures the significant role of weakly selected causal processes in the nearly neutral theory. 1. Introduction. Gabriel Dover once complained that being nearly neutral is like being “just a little bit pregnant” (Dover 1997, 91).
  • Detecting Selection on Noncoding Nucleotide Variation: Methods and Applications

    Detecting Selection on Noncoding Nucleotide Variation: Methods and Applications

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 Detecting Selection on Noncoding Nucleotide Variation: Methods and Applications Yang Ding University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Biology Commons, and the Evolution Commons Recommended Citation Ding, Yang, "Detecting Selection on Noncoding Nucleotide Variation: Methods and Applications" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1687. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1687 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1687 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Detecting Selection on Noncoding Nucleotide Variation: Methods and Applications Abstract There has been a long tradition in molecular evolution to study selective pressures operating at the amino-acid level. But protein-coding variation is not the only level on which molecular adaptations occur, and it is not clear what roles non-coding variation has played in evolutionary history, since they have not yet been systematically explored. In this dissertation I systematically explore several aspects of selective pressures of noncoding nucleotide variation: The first project (Chapter 2) describes research on the determinants of eukaryotic translation dynamics, which include selection on non-coding aspects of DNA variation. Deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments and polysome gradients in various eukaryotic organisms have revealed an intriguing pattern: shorter mRNAs tend to have a greater overall density of ribosomes than longer mRNAs. There is debate about the cause of this trend. To resolve this open question, I systematically analysed 5’ mRNA structure and codon usage patterns in short versus long genes across 100 sequenced eukaryotic genomes.
  • Issue 84 of the Genetics Society Newsletter

    Issue 84 of the Genetics Society Newsletter

    JANUARY 2021 | ISSUE 84 GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS In this issue The Genetics Society News is edited by • Non-canonical Careers: Thinking Outside the Box of Academia and Industry Margherita Colucci and items for future • Celebrating the 35th anniversary of DNA fingerprinting issues can be sent to the editor by email • Genetics Society Summer Studentship Workshop 2020 to [email protected]. • 2020 Heredity best student-led paper prize winners The Newsletter is published twice a year, • Industrious Science: interview with Dr Paul Lavin with copy dates of July and January. Celebrating students’ achievements: 2020 Genetics Society Summer Studentship Workshop, 2020 Heredity best student-led paper prize. Page 30 A WORD FROM THE EDITOR A word from the editor Welcome to Issue 84 elcome to the latest issue of the Thinking Outside the Box of WGenetics Society Newsletter! Academia and Industry”. This little This issue is packed with great news vade mecum for careers in genetics of achievements and good science. The collects inspiring interviews led first Genetics Society virtual workshop by our very own Postgraduate for the 2020 Summer studentship saw Representative, Emily Baker. In exceptional contributions from the Emily’s words, these experiences attending students. You can read more “demonstrate how a PhD in genetics about participants’ experiences in the can be a platform for a career in just interviews with the talk’s winners in about anything. Pursuing a career the Feature section. in academia, industry, publishing or science communication could be for Many more prizes were awarded: you, but so could many others. Why Heredity journal announced the not take a career path less travelled 2020 Heredity best student-led paper by, it might make all the difference?” winners, and James Burgon’s Heredity podcast dedicated an episode to the Enjoy! first prize winner, with insights from Best wishes, Heredity Editor-in-Chief, Barbara Margherita Colucci Mable.