DOCSLIB.ORG

Democracy Fund Announces Bipartisan National Advisory Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Democracy Fund Announces Bipartisan National Advisory Committee EMBARGOED UNTIL: March 29, 2016 For more information contact: Lauren Strayer Director of Communications (202) 420-7928 [email protected] Democracy Fund Announces Bipartisan National Advisory Committee WashinGton, D.C. – Today, the Democracy Fund announced the formation of its bipartisan National Advisory Committee, which will provide advice on orGanizational initiatives and assess strateGic opportunities to advance the Fund’s work to ensure the American people come first in our political system. Advisors include former White House and elected officials, as well as esteemed leaders from government, academia, and advocacy – reflectinG siGnificant political and demographic diversity. The Democracy Fund’s inauGural National Advisory Committee includes: • Hon. Robin Carnahan, Senior Advisor and Head of the State and Local Practice at 18F and former Secretary of State of Missouri. • Hon. Tom Davis, former U.S. Representative from the state of VirGinia, former Chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, and former Chair of the Government Reform and OversiGht Committee. • Mindy Finn, a veteran diGital and technoloGy strateGist, Senior Advisor to IMGE, and founder and president of Empowered Women, has operated at the intersection of media, politics and tech for some of the world’s most well-known public fiGures and brands including President George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the Republican Governor’s Association, Twitter, and GooGle. • Juleanna Glover, Senior Advisor at Teneo IntelliGence who has served on the senior staffs of then President-elect George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Mayor Rudy Giuliani, presidential candidates Steve Forbes and John McCain, and then Senator John Ashcroft. • Hon. Charles Gonzalez, former U.S. Representative from the state of Texas who served as Chairman of Latinos for Obama and as the National Co-Chair of President Obama's 2012 re-election campaign. • Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Professor of Communication and the Director of the AnnenberG Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania and award-winninG author of over 100 works, many of which primarily focus on campaign criticism and the discourse of the presidency. • Brett Loper, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs for American Express and former Deputy Chief of Staff to Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH). • Spencer Overton, President of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, tenured professor of law at GeorGe WashinGton University, and the author of the book Stealing Democracy: The New Politics of Voter Suppression. 1 • Hon. Deborah Pryce, former U.S. Representative from the state of Ohio and the hiGhest- rankinG Republican woman in the history of the House. She currently serves as a Senior Political Advisor at Ice Miller Whiteboard LLC. • Ben Rattray, founder and CEO of Change.org, the world’s largest platform for social chanGe with over 125 million users, one of TIME’s “100 Most Influential People in the World,” and a thouGht leader on the intersection of technoloGy, business, and social chanGe. • Arturo Vargas, Executive Director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO), a national membership orGanization of Latino policymakers and their supporters, and former Vice President for Community Education and Public Policy of the Mexican American LeGal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF). • Ernie Wilson, an American scholar and Walter AnnenberG Chair in Communication and dean of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Southern California. He has served in several senior policy positions in the public and private sector includinG as Director of International ProGrams and Resources on the White House National Security Council and Director of the Policy and PlanninG Unit, Office of the Director, U.S. Information Agency. Members of the National Advisory Committee serve a two-year term. The Committee meets twice a year, and its next meeting is in August 2016 in Washington, D.C. About Democracy Fund The Democracy Fund is a bipartisan foundation established by eBay founder and philanthropist Pierre Omidyar to help ensure that the American people come first in our democracy. Today, modern challenGes—such as hyper partisanship, money in politics, and struGGlinG media— threaten the health of American Democracy. Since its creation, the Democracy Fund has committed more than $30 million in Grants to ensure our political system is able to withstand these new challenGes and deliver on its promise to the American people. The Democracy Fund invests in chanGe makers who advocate for solutions that can bring lasting improvements to our political system and build bridGes that help people come toGether to serve our nation. Grants include projects to find workable solutions to the challenges facing our elections system, local media ecosystems, and Congress’ ability to solve problems in the face of hyper-partisanship. Learn more by visiting www.democracyfund.orG. 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US-CHINA TRADE WAR Uneasy Truce
    Xi Jinping and China’s new era Japan Emperor’s enthronement WeWork’s debacle MCI(P) 087/05/2019 November 2019 INDEPENDENT • INSIDER • INSIGHTS ON ASIA Best New Print Product and Best News Brand in Asia-Pacic, International News Media Association (INMA) Global Media Awards 2019 US-CHINA TRADE WAR Uneasy truce A partial trade deal is on the anvil for the world’s two leading superpowers. Will it be the breakthrough for global trade? Or, will hostilities prevail? WE BRING YOU SINGAPORE AND THE WORLD UP TO DATE IN THE KNOW News | Live blog | Mobile pushes Web specials | Newsletters | Microsites WhatsApp | SMS Special Features IN THE LOOP ON THE WATCH Facebook | Twitter | Instagram Videos | FB live | Live streams To subscribe to the free newsletters, go to str.sg/newsletters All newsletters connect you to stories on our straitstimes.com website. Data Digest Airlines’ emissions rising faster than predicted FLYING FREQUENTLY IS DAMAGING THE trajectory, aviation emissions could roughly environment at a rate far higher than estimated, triple by 2050, by which time aviation emissions says a new report by the United Nations’ might account for 25 per cent of the global carbon International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). budget, it adds. Greenhouse gas emissions from commercial Flights within the Asia-Pacific region emitted aviation totalled 918 million tonnes last year, the largest share of passenger transport-related accounting for 2.4 per cent of global CO2 CO2 at 25 per cent of the global total. The leading emissions from fossil fuel use and a 32 per cent countries in this list are China, Japan, India and increase over the past five years.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2010—2011 Health Programs Financial Information Leader in Disease Independent Auditors’ Report
    Celebrating 30 years of waging peace, fighting disease, and building hope 30 ANNUAL REPORT 2010—2011 HEALTH PROGRAMS FINANCIAL INFORMATION Leader in Disease Independent Auditors’ Report . 64 Eradication and Elimination . 20 Financial Statements . 65 Partner for Village-Based Notes to Statements . 70 Health Care Delivery . 22 OUR COMMUNITY The Carter Center at a Glance . 2. Voice for Mental Health Care . 24 The Carter Center Around Aontents Message from President Health Year in Review . 26 the World . 84 CJimmy Carter . 3 PHILANTHROPY Senior Staff . 86 Interns . 86 Our Mission . 4 A Message About Our Donors . 32 A Letter from the Officers . 5 International Task Force for Donors with Cumulative Lifetime Disease Eradication . 87 Giving of $1 Million or More . 33 PEACE PROGRAMS Friends of the Inter-American Pioneer of Election Observation . 8 Donors During 2010–2011 . 34 Democratic Charter . 87 Trusted Broker for Peace . 10 Ambassadors Circle . 48 Mental Health Boards . 88 Champion for Human Rights . 12 Legacy Circle . 58 Board of Councilors . 89 Peace Year in Review . 14 Founders . 61 Board of Trustees . 92 A woman works at a small-scale subsistence mine in the province of Katanga, southeastern Democratic Republic of the Congo . The Carter Center’s work in the country is raising awareness about the nation’s lucrative mining industry, which generates huge profits while impoverished local communities receive few of the benefits . 1 The Carter Center at a Glance Overview • Strengthening international standards for human rights The Carter Center was founded in 1982 by former U.S. and the voices of individuals defending those rights in President Jimmy Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, in their communities worldwide partnership with Emory University, to advance peace and • Pioneering new public health approaches to preventing health worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • 11055 Winnersprogram.Indd
    3 4 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE JUDGES ...................................8 Internet/Electronic Media – The AAPC Pollie Awards for THE WINNERS ..............................12 Excellence in Digital Media – Brought to You by Yahoo! ..............25 Direct Mail ......................................12 Phones ...........................................34 Fundraising .....................................14 Field ...............................................36 Collateral ........................................15 Campaigns .....................................36 Newspaper .....................................22 Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda ...............36 Television – The AAPC-NCC Pollie Awards for Excellence Student ..........................................37 in Cable Advertising .......................23 ADVERTISER INDEX CBS Radio .................................................................................... 43 Producer’s Handy Dandy .............................................................. 31 Connell Donatelli .......................................................................... 40 Robert Kaplan Fund Raising, Inc. ................................................ 47 Corbis ............................................................................................ 11 Salesforce.com .............................................................................. 41 Executive Communications, Inc. .................................................. 42 Signature Media .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-965 In the S upreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP , PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES , ET AL ., petitioners v. STATE OF HAWAII , ET AL ., respondents On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE EVAN MCMULLIN, ANNE APPLEBAUM, MAX BOOT, LINDA CHAVEZ, ELIOT COHEN, MINDY FINN, JULEANNA GLOVER, NORMAN ORNSTEIN, MICHAEL STEELE, CHARLIE SYKES, AND JERRY TAYLOR IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS R. REEVES ANDERSON JOHN B. BELLINGER , III ARNOLD & PORTER Counsel of Record KAYE SCHOLER LLP ELLIOTT C. MOGUL 370 Seventeenth St. KAITLIN KONKEL Suite 4400 ARNOLD & PORTER Denver, CO 80202 KAYE SCHOLER LLP (303) 863-1000 601 Mass. Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 942-5000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of Amici Curiae .............................................. 1 Introduction and Summary of Argument ................... 2 Argument ..................................................................... 4 I. EO-3 contravenes the prohibition on nationality-based discrimination that Congress, with support from almost all Republicans, adopted in 1965 ................................ 5 A. Congress intended to eliminate “all vestiges of discrimination against any national group” from our immigration system ............................................................... 6 1. Members of both parties, and Republicans in particular, strenuously repudiated the discriminatory policies that predated the 1965 Act ......................... 7 2. The 1965 Act rectified missteps in U.S. immigration policy ............................ 12 3. The principles underlying the 1965 Act are now fundamental to our national identity ........................................ 16 B. EO-3 runs afoul of Congress’s nondiscrimination guarantee ......................... 18 II. The President may not substitute his alternative policy judgments for Congress’s comprehensive statutory immigration scheme ..
    [Show full text]
  • ONFI-2017-990-PF.Pdf
    OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation 2017 G Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service G Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2017 or tax year beginning , 2017, and ending , A Employer identification number Omidyar Network Fund, Inc 20-1173866 1991 Broadway St #200 B Telephone number (see instructions) Redwood City, CA 94063 650-482-2500 C If exemption application is pending, check here. G G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D1Foreign organizations, check here. G Final return Amended return Address change Name change 2 Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach computation . G H Check type of organization:X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here. G IJFair market value of all assets at end of year Accounting method: CashX Accrual (from Part II, column (c), line 16) Other (specify) F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination G $ 545,202,008. (Part I, column (d) must be on cash basis.) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here. G Part I Analysis of Revenue and (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net (d) Disbursements Expenses (The total of amounts in expenses per books income income for charitable columns (b), (c), and (d) may not neces- purposes sarily equal the amounts in column (a) (cash basis only) (see instructions).) 1 Contributions, gifts, grants, etc., received (attach schedule).
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Auction Houses Doing All They Should Or Could to Stop Online Fraud?
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 52 Issue 2 Article 8 3-2000 Online Auction Fraud: Are the Auction Houses Doing All They Should or Could to Stop Online Fraud? James M. Snyder Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Communications Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Snyder, James M. (2000) "Online Auction Fraud: Are the Auction Houses Doing All They Should or Could to Stop Online Fraud?," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 52 : Iss. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol52/iss2/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE Online Auction Fraud: Are the Auction Houses Doing All They Should or Could to Stop Online Fraud? James M. Snyder* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 454 II. COMPLAINTS OF ONLINE AUCTION FRAUD INCREASE AS THE PERPETRATORS BECOME MORE CREATV ................................. 455 A. Statistical Evidence of the Increase in Online Auction Fraud.................................................................................... 455 B. Online Auction Fraud:How Does It Happen? ..................... 457 1. Fraud During the Bidding Process .................................. 457 2. Fraud After the Close of the Auction .............................. 458 IlL VARIOUS PARTES ARE ATrEMPTNG TO STOP ONLINE AUCTION FRAUD .......................................................................... 459 A. The Online Auction Houses' Efforts to Self-regulate...........
    [Show full text]
  • The Medicare Drug War
    The Medicare Drug War: An Army of Nearly 1,000 Lobbyists Pushes a Medicare Law that Puts Drug Company and HMO Profits Ahead of Patients and Taxpayers Congress Watch June 2004 Acknowledgments The primary author of “The Medicare Drug War” was Investigative Reporter Craig Aaron. Senior Researcher Taylor Lincoln provided substantial research and technical assistance. Additional research provided by Legislative Assistant Cristina Francisco and researchers Amanda Morse, Andrea Parsons and Peter Hickey. Research Director Neal Pattison and Legislative Assistant Jessica Kutch also helped prepare this report. Congress Watch Director Frank Clemente made significant editorial contributions to this report. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a 160,000 member non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. representing consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, research and public education. Since its founding in 1971, Public Citizen has fought for consumer rights in the marketplace, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform, fair trade, clean and safe energy sources, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen has five divisions and is active in every public forum: Congress, the courts, governmental agencies and the media. Congress Watch is one of the five divisions. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 Phone: 202-546-4996 Fax: 202-547-7392 www.citizen.org ©2004 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. Price $20.00 Call Public Citizen’s Publication Office, 1-800-289-3787 for additional orders and pricing information or consult our web site at www.citizen.org. Major credit cards accepted. Or write to: Members Services Public Citizen 1600 20th Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairncross Review a Sustainable Future for Journalism
    THE CAIRNCROSS REVIEW A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR JOURNALISM 12 TH FEBRUARY 2019 Contents Executive Summary 5 Chapter 1 – Why should we care about the future of journalism? 14 Introduction 14 1.1 What kinds of journalism matter most? 16 1.2 The wider landscape of news provision 17 1.3 Investigative journalism 18 1.4 Reporting on democracy 21 Chapter 2 – The changing market for news 24 Introduction 24 2.1 Readers have moved online, and print has declined 25 2.2 Online news distribution has changed the ways people consume news 27 2.3 What could be done? 34 Chapter 3 – News publishers’ response to the shift online and falling revenues 39 Introduction 39 3.1 The pursuit of digital advertising revenue 40 Case Study: A Contemporary Newsroom 43 3.2 Direct payment by consumers 48 3.3 What could be done 53 Chapter 4 – The role of the online platforms in the markets for news and advertising 57 Introduction 57 4.1 The online advertising market 58 4.2 The distribution of news publishers’ content online 65 4.3 What could be done? 72 Cairncross Review | 2 Chapter 5 – A future for public interest news 76 5.1 The digital transition has undermined the provision of public-interest journalism 77 5.2 What are publishers already doing to sustain the provision of public-interest news? 78 5.3 The challenges to public-interest journalism are most acute at the local level 79 5.4 What could be done? 82 Conclusion 88 Chapter 6 – What should be done? 90 Endnotes 103 Appendix A: Terms of Reference 114 Appendix B: Advisory Panel 116 Appendix C: Review Methodology 120 Appendix D: List of organisations met during the Review 121 Appendix E: Review Glossary 123 Appendix F: Summary of the Call for Evidence 128 Introduction 128 Appendix G: Acknowledgements 157 Cairncross Review | 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary “The full importance of an epoch-making idea is But the evidence also showed the difficulties with often not perceived in the generation in which it recommending general measures to support is made..
    [Show full text]
  • Web Video Poised for Central Role in 2012 Election 18 October 2011, by Theodore Kim
    Web video poised for central role in 2012 election 18 October 2011, By Theodore Kim When Texas Gov. Rick Perry launched an attack of influence the buzz about the campaign, respond to Mitt Romney's health care plan last week, he did criticism and rally donors. not call a news conference, give a big speech or take to the air waves. There is a potential downside, too. Video messages may excite true believers, but they are Perry's campaign turned instead to YouTube, often not circulated enough to have a big impact on posting a Web video that caught media attention swing voters. Expensive television ads are still and prompted Romney's campaign to quickly required to reach the masses. And when a video respond. portraying a candidate negatively goes viral, it is hard for a campaign to answer. Six decades after Richard Nixon's famous "Checkers speech" propelled television to a central But YouTube is a natural fit for campaigns. It is role in political campaigns, Web video could be popular, free and accessible on computers, poised for a similar breakout in 2012. smartphones and other digital devices. Creating high-quality video is a cinch, and video can touch Every major presidential candidate maintains a off visceral reactions that press releases or channel on YouTube, the dominant Web video statements on websites cannot. And it lets site. YouTube recently started a politics page that candidates broadcast a message without media tracks and highlights the most viewed campaign skepticism. videos each day. "A candidate's message is so much more powerful A slick clip on the economy posted by Perry a few if it comes from their lips than if you read about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics with Rachel Maddow
    Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics with Rachel Maddow 2010 Table of Contents History of the Theodore H. White Lecture .........................................................5 Biography of Rachel Maddow .............................................................................7 Biographies of William Greider and David Nyhan ..........................................9 Welcoming Remarks by Dean David Ellwood ................................................11 Awarding of the David Nyhan Prize for Political Journalism to William Greider ........................................................................................11 The 2010 Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics by Rachel Maddow .......................................................................................19 The 2010 Theodore H. White Seminar on Press and Politics .........................37 Alex S. Jones, Director of the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy (moderator) Mindy Finn, GOP online political consultant Charles Gibson, former ABC News anchor and Reidy Fellow at the Shorenstein Center William Greider, national affairs correspondent forThe Nation and recipient of the 2010 Nyhan Prize David King, Lecturer at Harvard Kennedy School Susan Milligan, former Boston Globe reporter; IOP Fellow Twenty-first Annual Theodore H. White Lecture 3 The Theodore H. White Lecture com- memorates the life of the reporter and historian who created the style and set the standard for contemporary political journalism and campaign coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat from the Right Intensifies
    THREAT FROM THE RIGHT INTENSIFIES May 2018 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Meeting the Privatization Players ..............................................................................3 Education Privatization Players .....................................................................................................7 Massachusetts Parents United ...................................................................................................11 Creeping Privatization through Takeover Zone Models .............................................................14 Funding the Privatization Movement ..........................................................................................17 Charter Backers Broaden Support to Embrace Personalized Learning ....................................21 National Donors as Longtime Players in Massachusetts ...........................................................25 The Pioneer Institute ....................................................................................................................29 Profits or Professionals? Tech Products Threaten the Future of Teaching ....... 35 Personalized Profits: The Market Potential of Educational Technology Tools ..........................39 State-Funded Personalized Push in Massachusetts: MAPLE and LearnLaunch ....................40 Who’s Behind the MAPLE/LearnLaunch Collaboration? ...........................................................42 Gates
    [Show full text]
  • Starting Over: the Center-Right After Trump a Niskanen Center Conference on December 11, 2018
    1 Starting Over: The Center-Right After Trump A Niskanen Center Conference on December 11, 2018 PANEL 3: POLITICAL PROSPECTS FOR A NEW CENTER-RIGHT Moderator: Geoff Kabaservice Panelists: Whit Ayres, Juleanna Glover, Mike Murphy Geoff Kabaservice: As some of you know, I was in Germany over the weekend, trying to do what I could to help plan this conference remotely. I couldn’t even begin to tell you what time my body thinks it is right now. Every time I go to Germany, it seems that I pick up a new word that has some relevance to my life or what’s about to follow. Last time I was there, I learned the term kummerspeck, which is literally “bacon grief.” It’s the food you eat and the weight you put on in the wake of some traumatic event, like a disappointing romantic episode. This time the term I learned was suppenkoma — “soup coma” — which is the stuporous state you find yourself falling into when you are at the first session after lunch of a conference. But fortunately we have the perfect antidote here to the soup coma, which is three of the best Republican political consultants, operatives, gurus that there are anywhere on the face of the Earth. Juleanna Glover: But I don’t consider myself a Republican anymore. [laughter] Geoff Kabaservice: Former, present, and possibly future Republican gurus, then. So this is Juleanna Glover to my left, Whit Ayres to my right, and Mike Murphy on the far right. Okay, so the subject of this panel is “Political Prospects for a New Center-Right.” This is where we descend from the somewhat empyrean realms of theory and philosophy into the more practical, Lenin-like question: What is to be done? Geoff Kabaservice: Those of us on the center-right have not had a pleasant time of it for the last several years — decades, perhaps.
    [Show full text]