NIMR) C.1960–C.2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NIMR) C.1960–C.2000 TECHNOLOGY, TECHNIQUES, AND TECHNICIANS AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH (NIMR) c.1960–c.2000 The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group, Queen Mary University of London, on 17 June 2014 Edited by C Overy and E M Tansey Volume 59 2016 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2016 First published by Queen Mary University of London, 2016 The History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 1 91019 5161 All volumes are freely available online at www.histmodbiomed.org Please cite as: Overy C, Tansey E M. (eds) (2016) Technology, Techniques, and Technicians at the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) c.1960–c.2000. Wellcome Witnesses to Contemporary Medicine, vol. 59. London: Queen Mary University of London. CONTENTS What is a Witness Seminar? v Acknowledgements E M Tansey and C Overy vii Illustrations and credits ix Abbreviations xv Introduction Jim Smith xvii Transcript Edited by C Overy and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Floor plans of the NIMR at Holly Hill 125 Appendix 2 The fraction collector 127 Appendix 3 A history of the chemistry laboratory: Form and function Peter J T Morris 129 Appendix 4 Computers at the NIMR Steven White 145 Appendix 5 The planimeter Anthony S Travis 149 Appendix 6 The first decade at the NIMR, Mill Hill: The instruments that revolutionized analytical chemistry Anthony S Travis 151 Appendix 7 Apparatus used to prepare cell walls Ian Mathison 171 Appendix 8 References by Sutherland et al. for pump and countercurrent chromatography research at the NIMR, showing NIMR Scientists and NIMR Research Officers and Technicians Ian Sutherland 173 Biographical notes 177 References 187 Index 197 Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications 209 WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? The Witness Seminar is a specialized form of oral history, where several individuals associated with a particular set of circumstances or events are invited to meet together to discuss, debate, and agree or disagree about their memories. The meeting is recorded, transcribed, and edited for publication. This format was first devised and used by the Wellcome Trust’s History of Twentieth Century Medicine Group in 1993 to address issues associated with the discovery of monoclonal antibodies. We developed this approach after holding a conventional seminar, given by a medical historian, on the discovery of interferon. Many members of the invited audience were scientists or others involved in that work, and the detailed and revealing discussion session afterwards alerted us to the importance of recording ‘communal’ eyewitness testimonies. We learned that the Institute for Contemporary British History held meetings to examine modern political, diplomatic, and economic history, which they called Witness Seminars, and this seemed a suitable title for us to use also. The unexpected success of our first Witness Seminar, as assessed by the willingness of the participants to attend, speak frankly, agree and disagree, and also by many requests for its transcript, encouraged us to develop the Witness Seminar model into a full programme, and since then more than 65 meetings have been held and published on a wide array of biomedical topics.1 These seminars have proved an ideal way to bring together clinicians, scientists, and others interested in contemporary medical history to share their memories. We are not seeking a consensus, but are providing the opportunity to hear an array of voices, many little known, of individuals who were ‘there at the time’ and thus able to question, ratify, or disagree with others’ accounts – a form of open peer-review. The material records of the meeting also create archival sources for present and future use. The History of Twentieth Century Medicine Group became a part of the Wellcome Trust’s Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL in October 2000 and remained so until September 2010. It has been part of the School of History, Queen Mary University of London, since October 2010, as the History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group, which the Wellcome Trust 1 See pages 209–15 for a full list of Witness Seminars held, details of the published volumes, and other related publications. v funds principally under a Strategic Award entitled ‘The Makers of Modern Biomedicine’. The Witness Seminar format continues to be a major part of that programme, although now the subjects are largely focused on areas of strategic importance to the Wellcome Trust, including the neurosciences, clinical genetics, and medical technology.2 Once an appropriate topic has been agreed, usually after discussion with a specialist adviser, suitable participants are identified and invited. As the organization of the Seminar progresses and the participants’ list is compiled, a flexible outline plan for the meeting is devised, with assistance from the meeting’s designated chairman/moderator. Each participant is sent an attendance list and a copy of this programme before the meeting. Seminars last for about four hours; occasionally full-day meetings have been held. After each meeting the raw transcript is sent to every participant, each of whom is asked to check his or her own contribution and to provide brief biographical details for an appendix. The editors incorporate participants’ minor corrections and turn the transcript into readable text, with footnotes, appendices, and a bibliography. Extensive research and liaison with the participants is conducted to produce the final script, which is then sent to every contributor for approval and to assign copyright to the Wellcome Trust. Copies of the original, and edited, transcripts and additional correspondence generated by the editorial process are all deposited with the records of each meeting in the Wellcome Library, London (archival reference GC/253) and are available for study. For all our volumes, we hope that, even if the precise details of the more technical sections are not clear to the non-specialist, the sense and significance of the events will be understandable to all readers. Our aim is that the volumes inform those with a general interest in the history of modern medicine and medical science; provide historians with new insights, fresh material for study, and further themes for research; and emphasize to the participants that their own working lives are of proper and necessary concern to historians. 2 See our group’s website at www.histmodbiomed.org. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The subject of laboratory technicians has been a long-standing interest of one of us (TT). In various discussions with Jon Marsh, Andrew Pinder, John Sawkins, and Tony Travis, the idea arose of organizing a Witness Seminar on the topic, within the defined remit of the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), which was about to close. We are very grateful to them for their help in planning this full-day meeting. We thank Dr Jim Smith for writing the introduction to the volume, which highlights his own long personal and professional association with the NIMR, and our gratitude also goes to several of the participants for providing the additional information in the appendices and for many of the images used to illustrate the volume. We also thank the Medical Research Council and the Institution of Mechanical Engineers for permission to reproduce a number of the figures, and the Wellcome Library, London, for permission to use photographs taken at the meeting, and historical images, which are reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We are particularly grateful to Tony Travis and Peter Morris for providing short lectures during the meeting, which are reproduced in the appendices. As with all our meetings, we depend a great deal on Wellcome Trust staff to ensure their smooth running: Audiovisual, Catering, Reception, Security, and Wellcome Images. We are also grateful to Mr Akio Morishima for the design and production of this volume; the indexer Ms Cath Topliff; Mrs Sarah Beanland and Ms Fiona Plowman for proofreading; Mrs Debra Gee for transcribing the seminar; and Mr Adam Wilkinson who assisted in the organization and running of the meeting. Finally, we thank the Wellcome Trust for supporting this programme. Tilli Tansey Caroline Overy School of History, Queen Mary University of London vii ILLUSTRATIONS AND CREDITS* Figure A Dr Jim Smith, reproduced with his permission xix Figure 1 Dr Peter Morris, Dr Anthony Travis, and Professor Tilli Tansey 3 Figure 2 Professor Heinz Wolff 5 Figure 3 National Institute for Medical Research: Hampstead. Credit: Wellcome Library, London 6 Figure 4 Mrs Rosemary de Rossi 7 Figure 5 Mr Ian Mathison 10 Figure 6 Mr Jonathan Marsh 11 Figure 7 Cover of a season’s greetings card showing the NIMR at Mill Hill. Image supplied by Dr Anthony Travis from the Regina Schonfield Collection, Edelstein Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, used with the permission of the Medical Research Council 14 Figure 8 Mrs Hilary Morgan 16 Figure 9 Dr Peter Morris 17 Figure 10 Brunel College of Advanced Technology in 1963 and Mr Jonathan Marsh and a colleague studying for Higher National Certificate in Applied Biology at Brunel in 1964. Photographs supplied by and reproduced with permission of Mr Jonathan Marsh 18 Figure 11 The fraction collector. Photograph supplied by and reproduced with permission of Mr Ian Mathison 23 Figure 12 The NIMR Safety Handbook, c.1975/76. Document supplied by Mr Ian Mathison and used with the permission of the Medical Research Council 29 * Unless otherwise stated, all photographs were taken by Thomas Farnetti, Wellcome Trust, and reproduced courtesy of the Wellcome Library, London. ix Figure 13 Les Hills, Senior Technician in the Chemotherapy Division in the 1960s. Photograph supplied by and reproduced with permission of Mr Jonathan Marsh 33 Figure 14 Toilet paper from the NIMR (1950s) 35 Figure 15 Dr Peter Morris speaking on the history of the chemical laboratory 36 Figure 16 Mr Peter Turner 37 Figure 17 Professor Ian Sutherland 40 Figure 18 Dr Andrew Pinder 47 Figure 19 Demonstration of electrophoresis apparatus at NIMR, 25 October 1974.
Recommended publications
  • BMC Systems Biology Biomed Central
    BMC Systems Biology BioMed Central Commentary Open Access The long journey to a Systems Biology of neuronal function Nicolas Le Novère* Address: EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, CB10 1SD Hinxton, UK Email: Nicolas Le Novère* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 13 June 2007 Received: 13 April 2007 Accepted: 13 June 2007 BMC Systems Biology 2007, 1:28 doi:10.1186/1752-0509-1-28 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1752-0509/1/28 © 2007 Le Novère; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Computational neurobiology was born over half a century ago, and has since been consistently at the forefront of modelling in biology. The recent progress of computing power and distributed computing allows the building of models spanning several scales, from the synapse to the brain. Initially focused on electrical processes, the simulation of neuronal function now encompasses signalling pathways and ion diffusion. The flow of quantitative data generated by the "omics" approaches, alongside the progress of live imaging, allows the development of models that will also include gene regulatory networks, protein movements and cellular remodelling. A systems biology of brain functions and disorders can now be envisioned. As it did for the last half century, neuroscience can drive forward the field of systems biology. 1 Modelling nervous function, an ancient quest To accurately model neuronal function presents many Neurosciences have a long and successful tradition of challenges, and stretches the techniques and resources of quantitative modelling, where theory and experiment computational biology to their limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequencing As a Way of Work
    Edinburgh Research Explorer A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing Citation for published version: Garcia-Sancho, M 2010, 'A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing: From proteins to DNA, 1943-77', Journal of the History of Biology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 265-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009- 9184-1 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1007/s10739-009-9184-1 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Journal of the History of Biology Publisher Rights Statement: © Garcia-Sancho, M. (2010). A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing: From proteins to DNA, 1943-77. Journal of the History of Biology, 43(2), 265-323. 10.1007/s10739-009-9184-1 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 THIS IS AN ADVANCED DRAFT OF A PUBLISHED PAPER. REFERENCES AND QUOTATIONS SHOULD ALWAYS BE MADE TO THE PUBLISHED VERION, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: García-Sancho M.
    [Show full text]
  • BSCB Newsletter 2017D
    2017 BSCB Newsletter BRITISH SOCIETY FOR CELL BIOLOGY Meet the new BSCB President Royal Opening of the Crick Meeting reports 2017 CONTENTS BSCB Newsletter News 2 Book reviews 7 Features 8 Meeting Reports 24 Summer students 30 Society Business 33 Editorial Welcome to the 2017 BSCB newsletter. After several meeting hosted several well received events for our Front cover: years of excellent service, Kate Nobes has stepped PhD and Postdoc members, which we discuss on The head of a Drosophila pupa. The developing down and handed the reins over to me. I’ve enjoyed page 5. Our PhD and Postdoc reps are working hard compound eye (green) is putting together this years’ newsletter. It’s been great to make the event bigger and better for next year! The composed of several hundred simple units called ommatidia to hear what our members have been up to, and I social events were well attended including the now arranged in an extremely hope you will enjoy reading it. infamous annual “Pub Quiz” and disco after the regular array. The giant conference dinner. Members will be relieved to know polyploidy cells of the fat body (red), the fly equivalent of the The 2016 BSCB/DB spring meeting, organised by our we aren’t including any photos from that here. mammalian liver and adipose committee members Buzz Baum (UCL), Silke tissue, occupy a big area of the Robatzek and Steve Royle, had a particular focus on In this issue, we highlight the great work the BSCB head. Cells and Tissue Architecture, Growth & Cell Division, has been doing to engage young scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin
    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Mount Vernon Hospital
    Buses from Mount Vernon Hospital White Hill Mount Vernon/ London Road Bishops Wood Hospitals Batchworth Heath The yellow tinted area includes every Northwood Road bus stop up to one-and-a-half miles Shrubs Road from Mount Vernon Hospital. KEWFERR Main stops are shown in the Northwood Road Y D RIV white area outside. Littlebourne Farm E D A T A B HIRLME O C J RE R M OOR Northwood Road GARDEN PARK R S Y OAD R Shepherds Hill House R Y E E E F S A D S EW O W T L E Northwood Road A C Mount Vernon K Hareeld Academy Cricket R G Hospital IC K RO Ground K NE A M DE D A N HAREFIELD SW Hareeld S O RT High Street H NORTHWOOD RO D A D L A Northwood O THE AV M Northwood High Street R South Hareeld E NUE NE Emmanuel Church Moorhall Road L EEN LA T L GR Green Lane I M H H P E Green Lane Y Church Road Northwood High Street G R R L Dene Road S Hallowell Road ’ T E N Moorhall Road K LE C S The Gravel Pits I U D Pinner Road D D E CL Northwood Health Centre W Maxwell Road U V Hawkesworth Close/ Denham WAY Northwood College Nursery School COPSE WOO Northwood Hills Circus DENHAM Y NORTHWOOD Pinner Road Rickmansworth Pinner Green Denham Northgate Maxwell Road PINNER Leaf Close Northwood School Road Oxford Road HILLS Pinner Northwood Hills Duck’s Hill Road Whittington Way Manor House Drive Uxbridge Joel Street 331 Norwich Road The Ridgeway Duck’s Hill Road Jackets Lane Eastcote Whitmore Road Methodist Church Shaftesbury Avenue UXBRIDGE Duck’s Hill Road Reservoir Road Eastcote EASTCOTE Lascelles Avenue Breakspear Road Eastcote Lane Breakspear Crematorium Harrow
    [Show full text]
  • Calling Time the Nation’S Drinking As a Major Health Issue
    Calling Time The Nation’s drinking as a major health issue 12 250 10 200 8 150 6 100 4 50 to income Price relative 2 Litres of alcohol per person aged 15+Litres 0 0 1960 1964 1968 1970 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 A report from the Academy of Medical Sciences With support from March 2004 The independent Academy of Medical Sciences promotes advances in medical science and public health and campaigns to ensure these are translated as quickly as possible into benefits for society. The Academy’s 750 Fellows are the United Kingdom’s leading medical scientists from hospitals, academia, industry and the public service. The aims of the Academy are to: • give national and international leadership in the medical sciences; • promote the application of research to the practice of medicine and to the advancement of human health and welfare; • promote the aims and ethos of medical sciences with particular emphasis on excellence in research and training; • enhance public understanding of the medical sciences and their impact on society; • assess and advise on issues of medical science of public concern. The Academy of Medical Sciences was established in 1998 following the recommendations of a working group chaired by Sir Michael Atiyah, Past President of the Royal Society. There is an elected Council of 22 Fellows that includes the five Officers of the Academy: President Sir Keith Peters, FRS, PMedSci Vice-President (Clinical) Lord Turnberg, FMedSci Vice-President (Non-clinical) Sir John Skehel, FRS, FMedSci Treasurer Sir Colin Dollery, FMedSci Registrar Professor Patrick Vallance, FMedSci The Academy is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sixty-Fifth Anniversary of Our Journal
    VOLAJRUME JOURNAL NO. januarY 20 The sixty-fifth anniversary of our journal hat would the founding prominent among them, formed the editors of AJR Information, crucial bridgehead between the Jewish W the predecessor of this journal, donor organisations overseas and the have said if they had been told in January desperate recipients in Europe. The 1946 that it would still be going strong in plight of the Jewish refugees extended 2011, 65 years after it first saw the light of beyond Europe to Shanghai, as an day? The first issue stated that the journal’s article in the journal entitled ‘How 15,000 primary aim was ‘to keep its readers refugees survived Japanese ghetto’ informed about the position of Jewries showed; Shanghai had been a refuge of on the Continent and about the work for last resort for Jews from Germany and their relief and rehabilitation’, while also Austria before its occupation by Japan dealing extensively with ‘the problems in 1941, and the destitute survivors of of refugees in this country and the legal, Japanese brutality were yet another economic and social questions and all concern for their fellow Jews in Britain the factors which add up to their status’, and the USA. and reporting on the activities of the AJR. Werner Rosenstock, General Secretary of the AJR, 1941-82, and Editor of AJR Information, But the principal focus of the journal’s The editors were Werner Rosenstock, 1946-82 concern was Germany, where the who continued in that capacity until 1982, ‘emaciated and half-starved’ remnants Herbert Freeden (Friedenthal), who left But conditions in Britain were vastly of German Jewry were eking out an for Israel in 1950, and Ernst Lowenthal, better than those obtaining in much of existence amidst the physical ruins who left for Germany in 1946 to take up a Europe, where people were often without of their cities and the moral ruin of senior appointment in the field of Jewish adequate food, clothing or heating.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Prof. Dr. Geoffrey L. Smith
    Curriculum Vitae Prof. Dr. Geoffrey L. Smith Name: Geoffrey L. Smith Born: 23 July 1955 Main areas of research: Microbiology, virology, immunology, vaccinia virus, vaccines Geoffrey L. Smith is a British microbiologist and virologist specialising in the area of poxviruses. His research examines the interaction of poxviruses with the infected host cell and the immune system, concentrating especially on the vaccinia virus that was the vaccine used to eradicate smallpox. His research has enabled new vaccination concepts to be developed and provided important insights into how viruses evade the host innate immune response and cause disease. Academic and Professional Career since 2011 Chair of the Pathology Department, University of Cambridge, UK and Principal Research Fellow, Wellcome Trust 2000 ‐ 2011 Director, Department of Virology, Imperial College London, UK 1989 ‐ 2000 Reader then Professor, University of Oxford, UK 1985 ‐ 1989 Lecturer in Virology, University of Cambridge, UK 1981 ‐ 1984 Postdoctoral Fellow, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA 1981 PhD, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, UK Functions in Scientific Societies and Committees since 2015 Chair of the scientific council, Friedrich Löffler Institute 2012 ‐ 2016 Member, Biomedical Panel of the University Research Grant Committee, Hong Kong 2011 ‐ 2014 President, International Union of Microbiological Societies 2009 ‐ 2012 Chair, Royal Society Committee for Scientific Aspects of International Security Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara Recent Work
    UC Santa Barbara Recent Work Title The Effects of Including Gay and Lesbian Soldiers in the British Armed Forces: Appraising the Evidence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/433055x9 Authors Belkin, Aaron Evans, R.L. Publication Date 2000-11-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE EFFECTS OF INCLUDING GAY AND LESBIAN SOLDIERS IN THE BRITISH ARMED FORCES: APPRAISING THE EVIDENCE Aaron Belkin* and R.L. Evans** November, 2000 The Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military University of Californ ia at Santa Barbara (805) 893 -5664 [email protected] *Director, Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, University of California, Santa Barbara ** Doctoral candidate, Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley I. EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y Like the U.S. military, the British Services is an all -volunteer force comprised of army, air force and navy contingents. Until January, 2000, when Britain lifted its gay ban following a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights , gay and lesbian soldiers were prohibited from serving in the British Armed Forces. The first ten months of the new policy have been an unqualified success. The military’s own classified, internal assessment at six months found that the new policy has “been hailed as a solid achievement” (Ministry of Defense, 2000e, p. 2). There have been no indications of negative effects on recruiting levels. No mass resignations have occurred. There have been no major reported cases of gay -bashing or harassment of sexual minorities. There have been no major reported cases of harassment or inappropriate behavior by gay or lesbian soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Visiting Forces (Relative Ranks) Regulations 1983
    44 1983/6 THE VISITING FORCES (RELATIVE RANKS) REGULATIONS 1983 DAVID BEATfIE, Governor-General ORDER IN COUNCIL At the Government Buildings at Wellington this 7th day of February 1983 Present: THE RIGHT HON. D. MAcINTYRE PRESIDING IN COUNCIL PCRSCA:\"T to section 6 (5) of the Visiting Forces Act 1939, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. REGULATIONS 1. Title and conunencement-(l) These regulations may be cited as the Visiting Forces (Relative Ranks) Regulations 1983. (2) These regulations shall come into force on the day after the date of their notification in the Ga;:.ette. 2. Declaration of relative ranks-For the purposes of section 6 of the Visiting Forces Act 1939, the relative ranks of members of the home forces and of the naval, military, and air forces of the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth of Australia, and Tonga respectively shall be those specified in the Schedule to' these regulations. 3. Revocation-The Visiting Forces (Relative Ranks) Regulations 1971* are hereby revoked. ·S.R. 1971/223 1983/6 Visiting Forces (Relative Ranks) Regulations 45 1983 SCHEDULE Reg.2 *TABLE OF RELATIVE RA"KS Ranks in the Home Forces Royal C\'ew Zealand C\'avy New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand Air Force 1. 2. 3. Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal 4. Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal 5. Commodore Brigadier Air Commodore 6. Captain Colonel Group Captain Matron-in-Chief 7. Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Principal Matron B. Lieutenant-Commander Major Squadron Leader Matron 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Policy Meeting Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz Science in The
    SUMMER 2014 ISSUE 27 encounters page 9 Science in the desert EMBO | EMBL Anniversary Science & Policy Meeting pageS 2 – 3 ANNIVERSARY TH page 8 Interview Jennifer E M B O 50 Lippincott-Schwartz H ©NI Membership expansion EMBO News New funding for senior postdoctoral In perspective Georgina Ferry’s enlarges its membership into evolution, researchers. EMBO Advanced Fellowships book tells the story of the growth and ecology and neurosciences on the offer an additional two years of financial expansion of EMBO since 1964. occasion of its 50th anniversary. support to former and current EMBO Fellows. PAGES 4 – 6 PAGE 11 PAGES 16 www.embo.org HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE EMBO|EMBL ANNIVERSARY SCIENCE AND POLICY MEETING transmissible cancer: the Tasmanian devil facial Science meets policy and politics tumour disease and the canine transmissible venereal tumour. After a ceremony to unveil the 2014 marks the 50th anniversary of EMBO, the 45th anniversary of the ScienceTree (see box), an oak tree planted in soil European Molecular Biology Conference (EMBC), the organization of obtained from countries throughout the European member states who fund EMBO, and the 40th anniversary of the European Union to symbolize the importance of European integration, representatives from the govern- Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL). EMBO, EMBC, and EMBL recently ments of France, Luxembourg, Malta, Spain combined their efforts to put together a joint event at the EMBL Advanced and Switzerland took part in a panel discussion Training Centre in Heidelberg, Germany, on 2 and 3 July 2014. The moderated by Marja Makarow, Vice President for Research of the Academy of Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Cells of the Nervous System
    3/23/2015 Nervous Systems | Principles of Biology from Nature Education contents Principles of Biology 126 Nervous Systems A flock of Canada geese use auditory and visual cues to maintain a V­ formation in flight. How are these animals able to respond so quickly to environmental cues? All animals possess neurons, cells that form a complex network capable of transmitting and receiving signals. This neural network forms the nervous system. The nervous system coordinates the movement and internal physiology of an organism, as well as its decision­making and behavior. In all but the simplest animals, neurons are bundled into nerves that facilitate signal transmission. More complex animals have a central nervous system (CNS) that includes the brain and nerve cords. Vertebrates also have a peripheral nervous system (PNS) that transmits signals between the body and the CNS. Cells of the Nervous System Structure of the neuron. Figure 1 shows the general structure of a neuron. The organelles and nucleus of a neuron are contained in a large central structure called the cell body, or soma. Most nerve cells also have multiple dendrites in addition to the cell body. Dendrites are short, branched extensions that receive signals from other neurons. Each neuron also has a single axon, a long extension that transmits signals to other cells. The point of attachment of the axon to the cell body is called the axon hillock. The other end of the axon is usually branched, and each branch ends in a synaptic terminal. The synaptic terminal forms a synapse, or junction, with another cell.
    [Show full text]