DOCSLIB.ORG

Covid-19 and the Energy Transition Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Covid-19 and the Energy Transition Contents July 2020: ISSUE 123 COVID-19 AND THE ENERGY TRANSITION CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................1 Other impending crises .................................................................................................................................................7 Giacomo Luciani 7 priorities to help the global economy recover while building a healthier, more resilient, net-zero-emissions economy .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Lord Adair Turner and Faustine Delasalle Can we use the COVID-19 crisis to move towards a more sustainable economy? .................................................. 13 Pedro Linares Drawing energy transition lessons from COVID-19 on international cooperation and individual behavior ............... 15 Pedro G. Gómez Pensado and Harsh Vijay Singh A climate-change approach to COVID-19 and its implications for the energy transition........................................... 18 Rolando Fuentes, Marzio Galeotti, Alessandro Lanza, and Baltasar Manzano COVID-19 and the energy transition ......................................................................................................................... 20 Pedro Antonio Merino Garcia COVID-19: accelerating the clean-energy transition ................................................................................................. 24 Richard Black COVID-19 and the end of the combustion engine era .............................................................................................. 26 William Todts COVID-19: Glimpses of the energy future? ............................................................................................................... 29 Malcolm Keay and David Robinson A clean and resilient electricity sector for a post-COVID recovery ............................................................................ 33 Carlo Papa, Giuseppe Montesano, Nicolò Sartori, Carlo Napoli and Mirko Armiento July 2020: ISSUE 123 The role of the electricity sector in the energy transition after COVID-19 ................................................................. 36 Francisco Laverón The US clean-energy transition in the era of COVID-19: the prospects remain robust ............................................ 39 Jacquie Ashmore, Cutler Cleveland, and Peter Fox-Penner COVID-19, the energy transition and oil companies’ adaptation strategies .............................................................. 41 Bassam Fattouh International energy companies navigating COVID-19 and delivering on their energy transition strategies ............ 44 Eirik Wærness National oil companies and the post-COVID-19 world .............................................................................................. 47 Pedro Haas COVID-19 and energy transition impacts on global gas markets .............................................................................. 50 Tatiana Mitrova and Jonathan Stern Energy after COVID-19: financing a neo-renaissance .............................................................................................. 53 Ahmed A. Attiga and Leila R. Benali Post-COVID-19 green recovery through the lens of an investor ............................................................................... 56 Helena Viñes Fiestas The COVID-19 exit strategy: fast-tracking and mainstreaming Net Zero amidst wicked geopolitics ........................ 59 Lara Lázaro Touza and Gonzalo Escribano Francés Energy transition, COVID-19, comparative advantage, and a world of uncertainty .................................................. 63 Kenneth B. Medlock III China’s climate commitments and energy ambitions beyond COVID-19 .................................................................. 67 Sam Geall Greening the Covid-19 recovery: feasibility and implementation issues in the European Union .............................. 70 Jean-Michel Glachant OXFORD ENERGY FORUM ii July 2020: ISSUE 123 INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic may be giving us glimpses of what the future of the energy sector will bring; and the glimpses keep coming as the pandemic continues with no early end in sight. There are two general themes that run through the articles in this Forum, reflecting that we are still in the middle of a global crisis. One is that uncertainty about the longer term is even greater than usual, because we do not know how governments and consumers are going to behave in a post-COVID world. The other is the tension between short-term imperatives (financial stresses) and the longer-term need for investment and adaptation that is also unusually high. The articles in this issue reflect a wide diversity of views on the effect of COVID-19 on the energy transition, ranging from acceleration of the process to slowing it down, with some arguing that it will have little lasting impact. The professional background of the contributors helps to explain the diversity of views, with articles from different parts of the energy sector, the financial sector, NGOs, and think tanks. Nevertheless, there is a general acceptance that the energy transition was already well underway before COVID-19 and that the recovery programme could well determine the nature and the speed of the transition in different parts of the world and reinforce global trends that were already apparent. Most authors believe that stimulus measures to limit the human and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic offer a chance to rebuild a cleaner and more sustainable world, but others are more sceptical. There also seems to be an acceptance that the pace of the energy transition will not be uniform across the globe and that weakened international cooperation reduces the chance of fast-tracking and mainstreaming the low-carbon transition globally. To help the reader navigate this exceptionally long issue, we have organized the 21 articles in five sections: lessons, electricity, oil and gas, financing, and geopolitics and regions. Lessons Giacomo Luciani argues that the impact of COVID-19 on energy transitions cannot be discussed unless other impending crises are also considered. The international market system is compared to the Earth’s crust, where tectonic movements accumulate stress along fault lines that are generally well known, until an earthquake unexpectedly releases the stress. The list of fault lines is quite long: globalization, which has been the main engine of global growth but now has passed its peak; the ballooning of public debt; the clogging of the arteries of global finance; the growing inequality within countries, which has become a source of political tension; and sharp differences in population growth and structures. COVID-19 exacerbated all of these creeping crises and has brought the world much closer to potential major discontinuities, especially as international cooperation continues to deteriorate. Luciani argues that a potentially positive development is occurring within the EU, where the health crisis seems to have precipitated the consolidation of strong will among the leading EU countries to deepen their integration with the launch of an EU instrument (joint debt issuance) to finance investment in a recovery programme in which the green agenda is a central component. Given this background, can COVID-19 lead to an acceleration of the energy transition? Luciani argues that the crisis has brought forward in time the adoption of solutions and behavioural changes that support the transition, such as greater reliance on remote working and education. However, other imposed changes are unlikely to last. Less mobility will reduce oil consumption in the OECD, but there is little reason to expect that the same will happen in the rest of the world. Luciani argues that while it may make sense to invest in creating a cleaner world, the identification of interests and political forces that may bring about this result at the global level is lacking. Also, investment expenditure needed to restart the economy must not only be large but also arrive very quickly. Some may argue that, differently from 2008–2009, clean energy projects are ready to be launched, but this does not seem very convincing; there is a wide array of interesting possibilities, yet no pipeline of projects that may be activated within months. Green investment may progressively become more important over time but will be of limited help in the next year or two. At the global level, cheaper fossil fuels will support demand and discourage clean energy solutions. For most emerging countries, climate change is not an immediate threat. In the end, the environment will benefit primarily because the economic downturn will last. Lord Adair Turner and Faustine Delasalle argue that governments in partnership with civil society and businesses must build back a better economy in the wake of the COVID crisis. They emphasize that clean energy and low-carbon and digital solutions are fundamental to achieving a more resilient economy. This could be achieved by putting seven key priorities at the heart of economic stimulus packages: (1) unleash massive investment in renewable power systems; (2) boost the construction sector with green-buildings and green-infrastructure projects; (3) support the automotive sector while pursuing clean air; (4) make the next waves of government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For Health and Climate: Retiring Coal-Fired Electricity and Promoting Sustainable Energy Transition in Developing Countries Author: by Donald P
    For Health and Climate: Retiring Coal-Fired Electricity and Promoting Sustainable Energy Transition in Developing Countries Author: By Donald P. Kanak1 Abstract • Coal fuels 38% of global electricity and there are plans to build over 1,000 new coal-fired power plants, mostly in the developing countries with growing energy needs. • Carbon emissions from those current and planned power plants will prevent the world from achieving the 1.5⁰C climate scenarios that call for a reduction of coal-fired electricity from 38% to 9% of total generation by 2030 and to 0.6% by 2050. • ESG initiatives are resulting in leading global financial institutions exiting and/or avoiding new investments in coal, but other buyers are stepping in; thus, many existing and planned coal assets are likely, without intervention, to continue to operate well beyond 2030-2050. • Proposed solution: Coal Retirement Mechanisms (CRMs) financial facilities that purchase coal-fired power plants in developing countries from existing owners and retire the plants in 10-15 years vs. typical 30-40 years of operation. Funds paid to current owners of coal-fired power plants to be recycled into new greenfield sustainable power. • The CRM’s capital would come from developed countries, multilateral development banks, climate funds and/or blended finance. Those investors would be paid back from the power plants’ operating revenues, but at a lower rate of return reflecting today’s low costs of funds. Supplementary revenue from carbon credits, transfer of fossil fuel subsidies, or energy surcharges might be used to meet or accelerate the retirement date. • Parallel to the CRM, a Sustainable Energy Transition Mechanism (SETM) will provide host countries with both financial and technical assistance to accelerate transition towards renewables (including storage, transmission, and distribution infrastructure).
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Gas Tracker Report 2021
    Europe Gas Tracker Report 2021Mason Inman, Greig Aitken, Scott Zimmerman EUROPE GAS TRACKER REPORT 2021 Global ABOUT GLOBAL PERMISSION FOR NONCOMMERCIAL USE Energy ENERGY MONITOR This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and Monitor Global Energy Monitor (GEM) is a in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without network of researchers developing collaborative informa- special permission from the copyright holders, provided tional resources on fossil fuels and alternatives. Current that acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this projects include: publication may be made for resale or other commercial ■ Global Coal Plant Tracker purpose without the written permission of the copyright holders. Copyright © April 2021 by Global Energy Monitor. ■ Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker ■ Europe Gas Tracker FURTHER RESOURCES ■ Global Gas Plant Tracker The Europe Gas Tracker includes project-level data in ■ Global Coal Mine Tracker spreadsheets, methodology notes, and an interactive global ■ Global Steel Plant Tracker map. To obtain primary data from the Europe Gas Tracker, ■ The Gas Index please use our request form. ■ CoalWire newsletter ■ GEM.wiki energy wiki ABOUT THE COVER Cover photo: Construction of the Krk LNG Terminal in ABOUT THE EUROPE GAS TRACKER Croatia. Courtesy of Balkan Investigative Reporting Network. The Europe Gas Tracker is an online database that identifies, maps, describes, and categorizes gas infrastructure in the European Union and surrounding nations, including gas pipelines, liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals, gas-fired power plants, and gas fields. Developed by Global Energy Monitor, the tracker uses footnoted wiki pages to document each project. AUTHORS Mason Inman is Oil and Gas Program Director, Greig Aitken is Research Analyst, Scott Zimmerman is Researcher at Global Energy Monitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Reply Comments of America’S Power Regarding the Commission’S Proposed Policy Statement
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Carbon Pricing in FERC-Jurisdictional ) Organized Regional Wholesale Electric ) Docket No. AD20-14-000 Energy Markets ) REPLY COMMENTS OF AMERICA’S POWER REGARDING THE COMMISSION’S PROPOSED POLICY STATEMENT SUMMARY OF REPLY COMMENTS America’s Power submits these Reply Comments following the Initial Comments that were filed by at least 70 parties, including America’s Power, in response to the Commission’s Proposed Policy Statement on Carbon Pricing in Organized Wholesale Electricity Markets (“Policy Proposal”). i Our Initial Comments urged the Commission to withdraw its Policy Proposal and terminate Docket No. AD20-14-000. One of our major concerns is that the Commission’s statement of “encouragement” to consider carbon pricing could be misconstrued as a signal that states should adopt carbon prices and enable grid operators to submit new market rules for FERC approval. Such a signal would exceed FERC’s authority. On the other hand, if the Commission finalizes its Policy Statement, our Initial Comments urged the Commission to clarify its intent ii and to take into account certain considerations when reviewing carbon pricing proposals from ISOs/RTOs. iii After reviewing the Initial Comments of other parties, we continue to urge the Commission to withdraw its Policy Proposal and terminate the docket. However, we have modified our recommendation. Our recommendation now is that the Commission — • Withdraw the Policy Proposal and terminate the docket, as we urged the Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Passing Gas: Why Renewables Are the Future
    PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE CLIMATECOUNCIL.ORG.AU Thank you for supporting the Climate Council. The Climate Council is an independent, crowd-funded organisation providing quality information on climate change to the Australian public. Published by the Climate Council of Australia Limited. ISBN: 978-1-922404-21-3 (print) 978-1-922404-22-0 (digital) Andrew Stock © Climate Council of Australia Ltd 2020. Climate Councillor This work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd. All material contained in this work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd except where a third party source is indicated. Climate Council of Australia Ltd copyright material is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License. To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org.au. Greg Bourne You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Climate Council of Climate Councillor Australia Ltd copyright material so long as you attribute the Climate Council of Australia Ltd and the authors in the following manner: Passing Gas: Why Renewables are the Future. Authors: Andrew Stock, Greg Bourne, Will Steffen and Tim Baxter. The authors would like to thank our two reviewers, Dr Hugh Saddler and one anonymous reviewer who donated their time of reviewing this report. Professor Will Steffen Climate Councillor — Cover image: Climate Council. Jeeralang A Power Station in Victoria. This report is printed on 100% recycled paper. Tim Baxter Senior Researcher (Climate Solutions) facebook.com/climatecouncil [email protected] twitter.com/climatecouncil climatecouncil.org.au CLIMATE COUNCIL I Contents Key findings .....................................................................................................................................................................................ii 1. Introduction: Gas has no place in Australia’s economic recovery, or climate safe future ................................1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Experiences of Time of Use Tariffs Report Prepared for Consumer Focus
    Consumer Experiences Of Time of Use Tariffs Report prepared for Consumer Focus Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ i Introduction .................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 Time of Use Tariffs ..................................................................................... 1 Research objectives ................................................................................... 2 Methodology............................................................................................... 4 Consumer profile ........................................................................... 7 Type of ToU tariff ....................................................................................... 7 Type of home heating ................................................................................ 8 Home tenure and housing type .................................................................. 9 Social grade ............................................................................................. 10 Household income and sources of income .............................................. 11 Age profile ................................................................................................ 13 Regional distribution ................................................................................. 14 Payment method for electricity
    [Show full text]
  • HIA South Korea April 2021
    Contents Contents 1 Key Findings 4 Introduction 5 The State of Coal Power and Air Pollution in South Korea 6 Scope and Purpose of the Report 8 RESULTS 10 Emissions Load & Air Quality 10 Toxic Deposition 11 Health Impacts 13 Cumulative Cost of Coal Dependence, Past & Future 18 Recommendations 21 References 22 Appendix 1: Methods & Materials 24 Appendix 2: Stack Properties and Emissions Data 27 Appendix 3: Per-plant Results 30 About CREA The Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air is an independent research organisation focused on revealing the trends, causes, and health impacts, as well as the solutions to air pollution. CREA uses scientific data, research and evidence to support the efforts of governments, companies and campaigning organizations worldwide in their efforts to move towards clean energy and clean air. We believe that effective research and communication are the key to successful policies, investment decisions and advocacy efforts. CREA was founded in December 2019 in Helsinki, Finland and has staff in several Asian and European countries. Authors: Lauri Myllyvirta Isabella Suarez Andreas Anhäuser Contributors: Minwoo Son The maps used in this document were prepared in accordance with South Korean regulation. CREA is politically independent. The designations employed and the presentation of the material on maps contained in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Time for a Check Up: The Health and Economic Cost of Coal Dependence in South Korea’s Power Mix Key Findings ● Exposure to air pollution from coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in South Korea is estimated to have caused approximately 9,5001 premature deaths since 1983, costing approximately USD 16 billion in healthcare and welfare expenditures, as well as loss of productivity and life expectancy.
    [Show full text]
  • New Directions in the International Political Economy of Energy
    Review of International Political Economy ISSN: 0969-2290 (Print) 1466-4526 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrip20 New directions in the international political economy of energy Caroline Kuzemko, Andrew Lawrence & Matthew Watson To cite this article: Caroline Kuzemko, Andrew Lawrence & Matthew Watson (2019) New directions in the international political economy of energy, Review of International Political Economy, 26:1, 1-24, DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1553796 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1553796 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 28 Jan 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 827 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rrip20 REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY 2019, VOL. 26, NO. 1, 1–24 https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1553796 SPECIAL SECTION: NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE IPE OF ENERGY New directions in the international political economy of energy Caroline Kuzemkoa, Andrew Lawrenceb and Matthew Watsona aPolitics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; bWits School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa ABSTRACT Until relatively recently international political economy (IPE) scholarship on energy has tended to focus on oil, rather than energy understood in its full, current diver- sity through IPE’s tripartite liberal, realist or critical lenses. Over the past decade or so there have, however, been far-reaching transformations in the global economy, not least in response to the increased recognition, and visibility, of damaging mani- festations of fossil fuel usage and human-induced climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition to Nowhere: Liquefied Natural Gas
    Cheryl McNamara, Media and Advocacy Coordinator, KAIROS Canada ● 416-875-0097 (C) ● [email protected] Transition to nowhere: Liquefied Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is lauded as a transitional fuel, a replacement to coal in a bid to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are heating and destabilizing the biosphere. Speaking to an international audience at the opening of Gastech 2020 on September 7, Natural Resources Minister Seamus O'Regan touted Canadian LNG as sustainable and competitive. LNG is a gas, primarily composed of methane, that has been cooled down to liquid form for ease and safety of non-pressurized storage or transport. The Canadian government has gone so far as to pursue a provision in the Paris climate accord to gain emissions credits, claiming that LNG exports to Asian countries will help reduce air pollution there. Unfortunately, these claims are backed by little substance. LNG development will not only prevent Canada from meeting its Paris emission reduction targets, it may also be an economic non-starter. The decreased demand for fossil fuels that preceded the COVID-19 pandemic is due in part to cheaper clean energy alternatives that are on the rise. Credit: Canaport LNG terminal in Saint LNG’s Carbon Footprint John, NB. “Climate change is principally caused by extracting carbon from below ground and putting it into the atmosphere. That Canada is now trying to get emissions credit for digging even deeper into fossil fuel production is preposterous.” LNG’s Big Lie, Marc Lee, Senior Economist at the CCPA’s BC Office Gas power plants emit 50 to 60 percent less carbon dioxide than coal plants so, the argument goes, Canada has a golden opportunity to exploit this natural resource and help the world mitigate the climate crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions Gap
    Emissions Gap Emissions Gap Report 2020 © 2020 United Nations Environment Programme ISBN: 978-92-807-3812-4 Job number: DEW/2310/NA This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Communication Division, United Nations Environment Programme, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. Disclaimers The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. For general guidance on matters relating to the use of maps in publications please go to http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/ htmain.htm Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by the United Nations Environment Programme or the authors. The use of information from this document for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion with no intention on infringement of trademark or copyright laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline Bubble NORTH AMERICA IS BETTING OVER $1 TRILLION on a RISKY FOSSIL INFRASTRUCTURE BOOM
    Pipeline Bubble NORTH AMERICA IS BETTING OVER $1 TRILLION ON A RISKY FOSSIL INFRASTRUCTURE BOOM Ted Nace, Lydia Plante, and James Browning PIPELINE BUBBLE Global ABOUT GLOBAL PERMISSIONS/COPYRIGHT Energy ENERGY MONITOR This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and Monitor Global Energy Monitor (for- in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without merly CoalSwarm) is a network special permission from the copyright holders, provided of researchers developing collaborative informational that acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this resources on fossil fuels and energy alternatives. Current publication may be made for resale or other commercial projects include the Global Coal Plant Tracker, the Global purpose without the written permission of the copyright Fossil Infrastructure Tracker, the CoalWire newsletter, and holder. the CoalSwarm and FrackSwarm wiki portals. Copyright © April 2019 by Global Energy Monitor. Cover photo courtesy of Pixabay. ABOUT THE GLOBAL FOSSIL INFRASTRUCTURE TRACKER The Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker is an online data- FURTHER RESOURCES base that identifies, maps, describes, and categorizes oil For additional data on proposed and existing pipelines, and gas pipelines and oil, gas, and coal terminals. Devel- see Summary Data at http://ggon.org/fossil-tracker/, which oped by Global Energy Monitor, the tracker uses footnoted provides over 30 tables providing results from the Global wiki pages to document each plant. For further details, see Fossil Infrastructure Tracker (GFPT), broken down by “ Methodology” at http://ggon.org/fossil-tracker/. nation and region. To obtain primary data from the GFIT, contact Ted Nace ([email protected]). AUTHORS Ted Nace is Executive Director of Global Energy Monitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentalism and World Politics
    Open Access Austin Environmental Sciences Mini Review Environmentalism and World Politics Jan-Erik Lane* Professor Emeritus, University of Geneva, Switzerland Abstract *Corresponding author: Jan-Erik Lane, Professor President Trump states that national interests call for more burning of fossil Emeritus, University of Geneva, Switzerland fuels, e.g. the acceptance of large scale fracking. National interests are the main reason why the 20 most polluting countries resist the COP efforts for global Received: February 19, 2020; Accepted: February 25, coordination at any price. What is national interest: economic development/ 2020; Published: March 03, 2020 growth, military power, political prestige, revenge for colonialism? Global warming and its enormous dangers should be debated on the preponderance of evidence only. Keywords: Schneider’s theorem; Hawking’s Irreversibility; The damocles sword of energy against temperature rise; Eliminating coal power Introduction Table 1: Top 20 Energy consuming, CO2 emitting, and coal power producing nations of the world Enerdata 2019, Crippa et al. 2019. Top 20 Energy Flamboyant Prime Minister of Great Britain has started Top 20 CO2 Emitting Top 20 producers of Consuming Countries preparations for COP26, scheduled to be held in Glasgow ultimo Countries 2018 coal energy 2019 2018 2020. The UN Conference of the Parties have convened since 1995 China China China under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in the effort to create a governance mechanism United States United States United States in relation to global warming. Recently, international governance India India India coordination has met with skepticism and criticism from civil society Russia Russia Russia around the world, supporting environmentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Money
    Nervous Money GLOBAL LNG TERMINALS UPDATE 2021Lydia Plante and Ted Nace GLOBAL ENERGY MONITOR NERVOUS MONEY Global AUTHORS Energy Lydia Plante is a Research Analyst at Global Energy Monitor. Monitor Ted Nace is Executive Director at Global Energy Monitor. ABOUT GLOBAL ENERGY MONITOR Global Energy Monitor (GEM) develops and shares informa- EDITING AND PRODUCTION tion on energy projects in support of the worldwide move- Edited by Mason Inman and James Browning. Design by ment for clean energy. Current projects include the Global Charlene Will and Mimi Heft. Additional design and page Coal Mine Tracker, Global Coal Plant Tracker, Global Fossil layout by David Van Ness. Infrastructure Tracker, Europe Gas Tracker, CoalWire news- letter, Global Gas Plant Tracker, Global Renewable Power ABOUT THE COVER Tracker, Global Steel Plant Tracker, Latin America Energy Photo of LNG tanker in Tokyo Bay. Copyright (c) Bill Chizek, Portal, and GEM.wiki. 2019. Courtesy of Getty Images. ABOUT THE GLOBAL FOSSIL INFRASTRUCTURE PERMISSIONS/COPYRIGHT TRACKER (GFIT) This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and The Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker is an online data- in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without base that identifies, maps, describes, and categorizes oil and special permission from the copyright holders, provided gas pipelines and terminals. Originally released by GEM in that acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this January 2019 and updated twice annually, the tracker uses publication may be made for resale or other commercial footnoted wiki pages to document each pipeline or termi- purpose without the written permission of the copyright nal.
    [Show full text]