<<

PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

CLIMATECOUNCIL.ORG.AU Thank you for supporting the Climate Council.

The Climate Council is an independent, crowd-funded organisation providing quality information on to the Australian public.

Published by the Climate Council of Australia Limited. ISBN: 978-1-922404-21-3 (print) 978-1-922404-22-0 (digital) Andrew Stock © Climate Council of Australia Ltd 2020. Climate Councillor This work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd. All material contained in this work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd except where a third party source is indicated. Climate Council of Australia Ltd copyright material is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License. To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org.au. Greg Bourne You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Climate Council of Climate Councillor Australia Ltd copyright material so long as you attribute the Climate Council of Australia Ltd and the authors in the following manner: Passing Gas: Why Renewables are the Future. Authors: Andrew Stock, Greg Bourne, Will Steffen and Tim Baxter. The authors would like to thank our two reviewers, Dr Hugh Saddler and one anonymous reviewer who donated their time of reviewing this report. Professor Will Steffen Climate Councillor

— Cover image: Climate Council. Jeeralang A Power Station in Victoria. This report is printed on 100% recycled paper.

Tim Baxter Senior Researcher (Climate Solutions) facebook.com/climatecouncil [email protected]

twitter.com/climatecouncil climatecouncil.org.au CLIMATE COUNCIL i

Contents

Key findings...... ii

1. Introduction: Gas has no place in Australia’s economic recovery, or climate safe future...... 1

2. Australia’s climate challenge...... 3

3. Gas makes a major contribution to the climate crisis...... 7 3.1 The use of gas in Australia 9 3.2 Gas is mostly made of methane, a potent greenhouse gas 12 3.3 The impacts of gas extraction depend on the method used 19 3.4 What are ‘fugitive emissions’ and why are they so important in understanding the impact of gas? 22 3.5 Gas-powered electricity generation in Australia 25

4. A better way to support wind and solar...... 30 4.1 The declining role of gas 32 4.2 Australians pay a high price for gas 36

5. A cheaper, cleaner, more reliable future...... 40

References...... 43

Image credits...... 48 ii PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Key findings 1 2 3 Australia’s in the grip of a Gas causes climate harm The international gas market climate crisis. Extracting and its emissions are under- is in crisis, and Australia is and burning more gas reported in Australia. dangerously exposed to job escalates risk and puts more losses and power price volatility. Australians in harm’s way. › Even before it is burned, gas causes climate harm. The main › A drastic increase in our gas › The past year of climate component of gas, methane, exports has exposed Australia extremes—an unprecedented is a greenhouse gas nearly to international boom-and-bust drought across vast swaths of 100 times more potent than market cycles. The wholesale price Australia, the Black Summer carbon dioxide in the short of gas reached record highs for bushfires, and a third mass term. Along the entire gas most Australians between 2016 and bleaching of the Great Barrier supply chain large quantities 2019, before plummeting as a result Reef in five years—was driven of methane are emitted. of a global supply glut in late 2019. by the 1.1°C of warming that’s already occurred as a result of › Australia is not counting › Most of Australia’s gas is climate change. the true contribution of gas expensive to produce compared towards climate change. to international competitors. › Climate change is driven by the Upstream emissions of gas, as The centrepiece of the Federal consumption of fossil fuels: , well as other leaks, are under Government’s gas-led recovery, oil and gas. Although a limited reported, using out-of-date a stretch goal of $4 per gigajoule and discrete use of existing measures based on decades- for gas, was described as a ‘myth’ gas may be necessary as we old analyses conducted in other by the extraction industry’s own fully transition to renewables countries. Once corrected, the lobbyists. and storage, if we are to avoid supposed climate benefit of slipping from a climate crisis to gas often disappears. › The combined impact of COVID a full-blown catastrophe there 19 and a price war between cannot be any expansion of fossil Russia and Saudi Arabia saw the fuel production of any kind. Australian oil and gas industry lose more jobs than any other sector of › There is still a chance to hold the economy in the first round of global temperatures to well job losses this year; shedding 40% below 2°C above pre-industrial of its employees between March levels, but any new and April 2020. infrastructure puts this target at risk. That includes any new gas production, or new gas projects. KEY FINDINGS iii

4 5 The second biggest user of We do not need new gas when gas in Australia is the gas renewables are cheaper and cleaner. industry itself, and that is costing all Australians. › Seismic shifts in the economics of renewables over the past decade › In 2019, Australia became the mean new gas infrastructure is world’s largest liquefied gas not needed. The cost of the core exporter, with nearly three times components of lithium ion batteries, as much gas exported than is used for battery storage, have fallen used in Australia each year. by nearly 90% in the past decade, from $1,100 per kilowatt hour in 2010 › Rising emissions from the gas to a mere $156/kWh in 2019. industry are cancelling out all the gains we have made in › It will be more expensive for Australia building a record amount of to transition from coal to gas. Wind solar and wind. and solar powered generation, even after being backed by storage, is the › More than one quarter of all gas cheapest form of new electricity consumed in Australia is burned generating infrastructure. by the gas industry to liquefy and chill gas for export overseas. › The Australian Energy Market Operator sees a steadily shrinking role for gas over the next 20 years. In most scenarios, more than two thirds of gas power stations will retire, without being replaced with new ones.

› Incentivising gas-powered generation means disincentivising cheaper and smarter options. As the sunniest and windiest inhabited continent on the planet, and with careful planning of infrastructure, Australia can transition to 100% renewable electricity supply firmed by a mix of storage, and demand side solutions.

climatecouncil.org.au 1 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

1. Introduction: Gas has no place in Australia’s economic recovery, or climate safe future

For too long, gas has flown under the Right now, Australia is facing twin crises radar. Along with coal and oil, it is – COVID-19 and climate change – and gas a major driver behind rising global is not the answer to either. The necessary temperatures, hotter conditions in public health response to COVID-19 has Australia and worsening extreme had a huge impact on the economy: both weather events. It has played an in Australia and around the world (Climate oversized role in driving up power Council 2020a). Economic recovery is top of prices – putting the manufacturing mind for most Australians, and governments sector at risk. Today, it is being have a crucial role to play in making targeted positioned as the “new” saviour of investments and implementing policies that the economy – based on overblown put Australians back to work. In doing so, claims that gas is cleaner than Australian governments can choose to invest coal and an overestimation of the in initiatives that set us up for the future, industry’s workforce. creating win/win solutions that create jobs and tackle long-term problems at the same time (AlphaBeta & Climate Council 2020).

Growing the gas industry will hinder, not help, this recovery with expensive energy. The Australian gas industry has been behind rising energy bills for years. The price of gas for most Australians has reached historic highs (Australian Energy Regulator 2020a) and, in turn, this has driven up the price of electricity (McConnell & Sandiford 2020). Promises of cheap gas have been described as a ‘myth’ by the industry’s own lobby groups (Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association 2020). CHAPTER 01 2 INTRODUCTION

In addition, growing the gas industry Even before COVID-19 hit, Australia was can’t provide the jobs that Australians struggling through a series of destructive desperately need. Neither producers climate impacts. Over the past two years, nor consumers of this fossil fuel can Australians have lived through record- provide stable employment given the breaking drought, the Black Summer current international price volatility. bushfires, intense heatwaves and yet another Both producers and consumers of gas mass bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef; the have been subject to significant job third in five years (Climate Council 2020b). losses in recent times. Chasing a dream of economic recovery through growth As both a fossil fuel and a greenhouse gas in of gas will be more expensive and less its own right, gas is part of the problem. In worthwhile on a jobs front compared contrast, the climate benefits of moving to to the alternative of a renewables-led wind and solar are undeniable. While there recovery (AlphaBeta & Climate Council is a discrete, and short-lived and short- 2020; Australia Institute 2020a). lived role for some existing gas to firm up renewables, new gas infrastructure won’t fix Luckily, we don’t need to follow this path. the problem – it will only delay the solution. In many industries – including electricity, which is the principal focus of this report The only stable recovery for Australia is one – zero emissions replacements for gas are that is based on building the infrastructure cheaper and more reliable. This is most of the future, not the past. A future where we obvious in the electricity sector, where a rapidly reduce , rapid decline in Australian gas-powered build competitive industries and create generation over the coming decades sustainable jobs that last for generations. looks increasingly likely as technologies This would address the immediate problem like batteries and pumped hydro storage of economic recovery from COVID-19 at become even cheaper (Australian Energy the same time that we tackle the long-term Market Operator 2020a). threat of climate change.

Growing the gas industry can’t provide the jobs that Australians desperately need. 3 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

2. Australia’s climate challenge

Producing and burning fossil fuels, Australia is already in the grip of a climate like gas, coal and oil, produces crisis having lived through one of the most greenhouse gases that drive climate extreme and dangerous years ever recorded. change. This section explains why This was driven by climate change. Global we must reduce greenhouse gas average temperatures have increased 1.1°C emissions as deeply and rapidly as since the second half of the nineteenth possible to avoid dangerous climate century (World Meteorological Organization change. This means that there can be 2020). The planet has almost certainly no expansion of fossil fuel production not experienced such a rapid increase in of any kind. This includes new gas temperature at any time in the past several production and new gas projects. million years (Hansen et al. 2013).

The impacts of climate change are already being felt in Australia. In the past few years, the continent experienced unprecedented drought across vast tracts of the country’s most productive land. Every mainland state was severely affected (see Figure 1).

The consumption of fossil fuels is a cause of the recent extreme weather events in Australia. CHAPTER 02 4 AUSTRALIA’S CLIMATE CHALLENGE

Figure 1: 24-month rainfall deficiency, period ending 31 Jan 2020.Source: Bureau of Meteorology (2020a).

2MONTH RAINFALL DEFICIENCY PERIOD ENDING 31 AN 22

Rainfall Percentile Ranking

Serious Deficiency

Severe Deficiency

Lowest on Record

Australia experienced its hottest and 2019 set a record for lack of rainfall in the driest year on record in 2019 (Bureau of Basin as well, with average rainfall across Meteorology 2020b). Australia’s climate the region less than half of the long-term has warmed by more than 1.4 °C since 1910 average. The three-year period ending in (CSIRO & Bureau of Meteorology 2020). 2019 was the driest in the Murray-Darling Every year since 2013 has been among Basin by a considerable margin (Bureau the 10 hottest years on record for Australia of Meteorology 2020b). These trends, both and the earliest year in that top ten is 1998 warming and drying, are directly linked (Bureau of Meteorology 2020b). to climate change (CSIRO & Bureau of Meteorology 2020; Abram et al. 2020). These These changes are being felt acutely in are trends are expected to worsen in future regions all over Australia. The Murray- (Grose et al. 2020; Ukkola et al. 2020). Darling Basin, for example, set an all- time heat record last year; experiencing These hot, dry conditions led to unprecedented temperatures that were more than 2.5°C fire risk, and ultimately to the most horrific above the long-term average. This eclipsed fire season ever recorded on the continent: the previous record – 2.3°C above average the Black Summer fires (Filkov et al. 2020). set in 2018 – and the previous second Nearly 80 percent of Australians were hottest – 2.1°C above average set in 2017. affected by these bushfires either directly or 5 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Australia is acutely vulnerable to climate change and is already experiencing its effects.

indirectly (Biddle et al. 2020). Thirty-three heating (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2018). The people lost their lives in the fires (Bushfire reef is far from being the only Australian Royal Commission 2020), and a further 429 natural wonder that is under threat from are estimated to have died due to bushfire climate change with many other species and smoke (Johnson et al. 2020). More than ecosystems across the country facing an 3000 homes were lost across the country uncertain future (Climate Council 2019a). (Bushfire Royal Commission 2020), and around 3 billion vertebrates were either Australia is one of the most vulnerable killed or displaced (WWF Australia 2020). developed countries in the world to the Dozens of threatened and non-threatened impacts of climate change (Reisinger & species are likely to have their conservation Kitching 2014; Grose et al. 2020). If it were status revisited, with some expected to possible to halt global temperature increases have been driven to extinction (Ward et to the 1.1°C of warming that has occurred al. 2020; Wintle, Legge & Woinarski 2020) so far then, as this past year has shown, and across the entire country, at least 24.3 life would be perceptibly worse as a result million hectares burned (Bushfire Royal of climate change. For Australians and the Commission 2020). In eastern Australia county’s natural environments, the future alone, an area roughly the size of England will certainly be far more difficult than it is – just under 13 million hectares – burned today as a result of burning coal, oil and gas (Wintle, Legge & Woinarski 2020). Australia (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2018). also recorded its largest ever fire, the Gospers Mountain mega-fire, which burned through The 2015 establishes a half a million hectares on its own (NSW shared global goal of limiting global mean Government 2020). temperature rise to well below 2°C above the world’s average temperature at the time that The Great Barrier Reef bleached again in industrial scale burning of coal, oil and gas March 2020 (ARC Centre of Excellence for began, and pursuing efforts to limit average Coral Reef Studies 2020) - the third such warming to 1.5°C above the same baseline event in five years after massive bleaching (UNFCCC 2015 article 2.1). Notwithstanding episodes in 2016 and 2017 (Hughes et al. the United States’ temporary withdrawal, this 2018). This type of bleaching event has goal has been agreed to by all 197 members been shown previously to be driven by of the United Nations, and formally ratified climate change (King et al. 2016) and the by all but eight countries, making it the global links have again been made (ARC Centre benchmark for domestic climate policy of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies 2020). (United Nations Treaty Collection 2020). As global emissions continue to rise, many Australia is a signatory to this agreement tropical coral reefs will struggle to survive and ratified it in 2016. in coming decades as a result of ocean Figure 2: Emissions from the fossil fuel sector, including the gas sector, are driving the climate impacts being seen today across Australia.

In 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on developing new fossil fuel infrastructure Climate Change (IPCC) released its special of any kind means that we put more report, Global Warming of 1.5°C (Masson- Australian lives and livelihoods in danger. Delmotte et al. 2018). This report made clear why warming must be limited as Existing coal, oil and gas infrastructure is much as possible (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. more than enough to push the world past 2018). Put simply, the closer global average 1.5°C of warming (Tong et al. 2019). Existing temperatures are to the conditions where and planned fossil fuel infrastructure human society evolved, the easier it will be is sufficient to push the world past 2°C to secure productive and successful lives and of warming (Stockholm Environment livelihoods. That report also outlines what Institute et al. 2019). There is clear benefit must be done to meet the goals of the Paris to holding global temperatures to the Agreement: immediate, deep and enduring lowest level possible, with 1.5°C, 2°C cuts to greenhouse gas emissions across the or higher global average temperatures world (Rogelj et al. 2018). representing step changes along a path to catastrophically dangerous levels of The burning of coal oil and gas is driving warming (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2018). climate change. It is not possible to tackle climate change unless we rapidly phase out all fossil fuels, including gas. Expanding or 7 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

3. Gas makes a major contribution to the climate crisis

There are many false narratives about This section steps through several key facts gas, both in Australia, and across the about gas. world. The reality is that gas is a fossil fuel and there can be no new gas or First it steps through the sectors of the gas expansion if we are to tackle the Australian economy that use Australian climate crisis. While there is a discrete gas. More gas is burned in Australia to and short-lived role for existing generate electricity than in any other sector. gas, we do not require any new gas However, nearly as much gas is consumed infrastructure, pipelines or drilling. in Australia by the gas industry itself just to process Australian gas for export and nearly three times as much Australian gas is sent overseas each year than is used here.

Next, this section steps through four core realities about the climate impact of gas. The core component of the gas burned in Australian homes and industries is methane, which is itself an extremely powerful greenhouse gas and produces carbon dioxide when burned. As scientific knowledge has progressed on the climate impact of methane over the past several decades, at each re-assessment, methane is shown to be a more powerful greenhouse gas than previously thought.

This section then deals with the various extraction methods for gas, with a particular focus on clarifying the various forms of unconventional gas extraction (described below). While unconventional gas extraction does not produce harms that can be detected at the surface in every instance, there are worrying trends in the scientific literature about the health impacts of these forms of extraction. CHAPTER 03 8 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

Then this section discusses so-called Finally, this section steps through the fugitive emissions. Despite the name various gas-powered electricity generation given to these emissions in official reports technologies. The oft-repeated claim from the Australian Government, the that gas-powered generation is ‘half’ the ‘fugitive emissions’ recorded in official emissions of coal does not stand up to statistics are almost entirely intentional scrutiny. The reality is that while one gas- releases of carbon dioxide and methane powered generation technology – combined- from the industry for operational reasons cycle gas turbine – can meet this standard in across the full supply chain. The total certain instances, this is not the form of gas- quantity of greenhouse gas pollution powered generation that is most well-suited released in the gas supply chain in to a future grid. Australia rivals several developed nations even before considering that this gas will Overall, gas is a large source of greenhouse eventually be burned and so release still gas emissions and these emissions are more climate pollution. To make matters not being correctly reported or accounted worse, the methods used to estimate for. This means Australian gas may be the greenhouse gas emissions of the significantly worse for the climate than is Australian gas industry have significant conventionally understood. integrity issues. The true climate impact of the Australian gas industry may be far worse than is currently reported.

Figure 3: Emissions from gas infrastructure begin at the wellhead and extend along the length of the supply chain. 9 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

3.1 The use of gas in Australia

In Australia, gas is used for several different one fifth of the gas burned in Australia purposes. More than half of the gas goes to various smaller purposes such as consumed here is used in generating residential and commercial heating. The electricity or in the manufacturing sector – breakdown of Australian gas use by sector mostly to provide heat for various industrial is shown in Figure 5, opposite. purposes (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 2020a). Another

Figure 4: As the largest liquefied gas exporter in the would significant quantities of Australian gas are sent overseas in tankers like this one, outside Darwin. NEARLY OF AUSTRALIAS GAS IS DEOTED TO EXPORTS 2 EXPORTED GAS . PROCESSING GAS FOR EXPORT

DOMESTIC USE

.2 . ELECTRICITY MANUFACTURING GENERATION

3. 1.2 RESIDENTIAL MINING

1. . COMMERCIAL OTHER SERICES

Figure 5: Proportion of gas consumed in Australia by sector (2018-19 financial year). Data source: Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (2020a). 11 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

In 2019, Australia became the world’s The total impact of gas extraction, largest liquefied gas exporter (Office of the processing and transport on Australia’s Chief Economist 2020). Processing gas for emissions is immense (Department of export, particularly liquefaction so it can Industry, Science, Energy and Resources be transported overseas on ships, requires 2020b). Since 2005, annual greenhouse gas immense quantities of energy; most of emissions from electricity have declined which is provided by burning gas on site. by 15 million tonnes.1 This reduction was Nearly three times as much Australian thanks to record deployments of wind and gas was sent overseas in 2019 as was used solar, which have dramatically reduced the here. The quantity of gas burned by the emissions intensity of the major electricity Australian gas industry was enough to grids (Clean Energy Council 2020). make it the second biggest consumer of gas in Australia is the gas industry itself Unfortunately, growing greenhouse gas (Department of Industry, Science, Energy emissions from the gas sector have cancelled and Resources 2020a). As a result of this, out this progress. Broadly, the climate more than one quarter of all gas consumed impact of the gas industry can be split up in Australia – 425 petajoules – was burned by upstream emissions (see section 3.4) and by the gas industry to provide the energy emissions from burning the gas for energy required to process and compress its own at the final destination (see section 3.5). Over product for sale overseas. the same period as the decrease in electricity emissions, annual greenhouse gas emissions from just the upstream emissions of the Australian gas industry have increased by 25 million tonnes (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 2020b).

Australia’s gas export industry consumes more gas processing its product for export than the entire Australian manufacturing sector.

1 On a carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂-e) basis using the global warming potential values in Working Group I’s contribution to the fourth assessment report to the IPCC (Forster et al. 2007). These assessments are explained in the following section. CHAPTER 03 12 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

3.2 Gas is mostly made of methane, a potent greenhouse gas

While gas is a fossil fuel, its main The extraction of all fossil fuels results in component is methane, a potent significant methane emissions even before greenhouse gas in its own right. This the fuels are burned, but the Australian gas means that the use of gas directly industry emits significantly more of this contributes to climate change in addition greenhouse gas per unit of energy than the to producing carbon dioxide when it is Australian coal sector. burned. Over decades of research the trend has been one where, with each All greenhouse gases trap energy that reassessment of the climate impact of would otherwise have escaped to space methane, the scientific community is and, as a result, heat the atmosphere, land learning that methane is significantly surface and oceans. However, different worse for the global climate than had greenhouse gases affect the climate in previously been understood. different ways. These differences relate to their relative ability to trap heat, their This section demonstrates the critical lifetime in the atmosphere, the impact they importance of accounting for the impact have on the concentration of other gases of methane accurately. Recent shifts and the lifecycle impact that emitting the in accounting practices for Australia’s gas has on the climate system overall. On emissions will add significantly to top of these inherent qualities, another Australia’s climate bottom line. Australia’s difference is the rate at which the gas is total emissions will increase by 3 per cent, being added to the atmosphere. but completely considering the impact of methane would cause a much more significant revision than this.

Gas is no climate cure, it is both a fossil fuel and a potent greenhouse gas. 13 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

BOX 1: CARBON DIOXIDE IS STILL THE MOST IMPORTANT GREENHOUSE GAS

The increase of carbon dioxide in the removed from the atmosphere if it is drawn atmosphere has been the most important down by human activity – something that is not contributor to climate change. Human activity currently feasible at scale – or natural processes – principally the burning of coal, oil, and gas – such as vegetation growth or dissolution in has added immense quantities of carbon dioxide ocean waters. to the global atmosphere since the industrial revolution began in the 18th Century (Hawkins The cumulative impact of carbon dioxide, and its et al. 2017; Gütschow et al. 2019). However, per long life in the atmosphere, means that cutting tonne of gas, the warming effect of carbon fossil fuel consumption of all kinds is by far the dioxide is relatively weak compared to most most important step in avoiding ever-worsening other greenhouse gases, including methane, climate impacts. This includes gas, which is nitrous oxides and the diverse range of synthetic the fastest growing fossil fuel and the fastest gases (Myhre et al. 2013). Once carbon dioxide growing source of greenhouse gas emissions reaches the global atmosphere, it is stable and (International Energy Agency 2020a; Stockholm does not break down readily. It can only be Environment Institute et al. 2019).

Given that greenhouse gases differ in their to be 25 times worse than carbon dioxide effects on the global climate in many ways, in accordance with the GWPs provided in scientists have developed simple metrics the IPCC’s fourth assessment report (Forster that enable comparisons between different et al. 2007). While this was allowable under gases (Myhre et al. 2013). These metrics are old international reporting guidelines, the necessary but principled simplifications. choice to use this assessment, which is now The most commonly-used metric – ‘global more than a decade old, ignores substantial warming potential’ or GWP – assesses the shifts in the scientific understanding of degree to which different gases shift the methane since that time. energy balance of the planet over time. From this perspective, emitting methane This year, Australia’s reporting guidelines is always worse than emitting the same were finally updated to bring them into line mass of carbon dioxide, but the difference with the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report, between the gases narrows over time (Gillett released in 2013 (IPCC 2013). However, as is & Matthews 2010; Myhre et al. 2013). shown below, this update does not entirely reflect the information contained in the Until recently, virtually all Australian climate work of the IPCC. Along with this, improved assessments that considered the impact assessments of methane’s climate impact of methane on global heating – from since that time mean that the next IPCC project approvals to the country’s national Assessment Report – due in 2021 – will likely greenhouse accounts – assumed methane include further, significant upward revisions Figure 6: While invisible, upstream emissions from the gas sector nonetheless contribute significantly to climate change and accounting for them accurately is essential to determining the industry’s impact.

to the calculated GWP of methane. As shown › Biotic methane is created by methane- in Table 1, a complete assessment of methane’s producing bacteria that break down climate impact in line with the latest organic matter. As well as being central available science would increase the GWP to the climate impact of the waste sector, of methane by 60% compared to the value and the land use sector more broadly, currently used by the federal government in these bacteria live in the stomachs of most reporting greenhouse gas emissions. cattle and other livestock. This is a major contributor to the agricultural sector’s First, the IPCC report makes clear that there climate impact. is a significant difference in the climate impact of methane emission sources. From › Fossil methane is also very often the a whole-of-system perspective, methane product of living processes but rather than emitted from active biological processes – being part of the active carbon cycle, this such as from livestock or landfills – has a is the result of ancient life. Fossil methane different effect on the heating of the planet to is made up of carbon that has been stored methane emitted from ancient sources such underground for millions of years far from as fossil methane, or gas. For the purposes of the surface and the global atmosphere. this report, these can be described as ‘biotic Virtually all gas burned for energy today is methane’ and ‘fossil methane’. fossil methane. 15 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Recent assessments of methane’s climate impact indicate that it is significantly more powerful than previously thought.

The release of fossil methane has a greater a role in causing these additional emissions, overall impact on the climate than biotic but because of the way the metric works, methane (Boucher et al. 2009). In basic accounting for these feedbacks has a more terms, this is because the emission of meaningful impact on the calculated GWP methane from recent biotic sources is of more potent greenhouse gases like inextricably linked to the cycling of carbon methane. Most of the processes causing this through the . The creation of each are subtle, and the scientific community biotic molecule of methane relies on the still has much to learn about their overall withdrawal of at least one carbon dioxide impact (Steffen et al. 2018), but there are also molecule from the atmosphere. dramatic, easier-to-understand examples (Department of Industry, Science, Energy The extraction of fossil fuels and release and Resources 2020c). of fossil methane, on the other hand, re- introduces to the atmosphere a greenhouse Around 800 million tonnes of carbon gas that had previously been locked away dioxide were released into the atmosphere for millions of years. As a result, from a by the 2019-20 Australian bushfires whole-of-system perspective, fossil methane (Department of Industry, Science, Energy contributes more to the destabilisation of the and Resources 2020c). Historically, fire is a global climate than biotic methane (Myhre et somewhat cyclical process and a feature of al. 2013). the Australian landscape. However, many aspects of this past season were unique, But methane’s total impact goes well beyond and driven by climate change (Filkov et al. the effect of the original release. Because 2020; Bushfire Royal Commission 2020). methane is such a powerful greenhouse gas, Undoubtedly, as forests and grasslands its release significantly contributes to carbon burned in the 2019-20 fire season regrow, cycle feedbacks in the natural environment some of the carbon dioxide released by (Gillett & Matthews 2010; Sterner & the fires will be drawn back out of the Johansson 2017). When greenhouse gases atmosphere. However, the increasing are emitted by human activity, and the frequency of fire means that it is certain that planet heats, this triggers the release of significant permanent change will occur further greenhouse gases from destabilised (Enright et al. 2015; Fairman et al. 2017; natural processes. All greenhouse gases play Schmidt 2020). CHAPTER 03 16 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

These shifts in local- and global-scale Finally, since the publication of the natural cycles, where heating of the global IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report in 2013 atmosphere drives new greenhouse gas scientific knowledge has progressed on emissions which in turn drive further the cumulative climate forcing impacts of heating of the atmosphere, can be emitting methane. While some outstanding accounted for in GWP calculations. Doing uncertainty remains (Smith et al. 2018), so significantly affects the outcome for more recent re-assessments have found that powerful but relatively short-lived gases the total impact of methane is substantially like methane (Myhre et al. 2013). This is higher than was once thought, increasing because, weight-for-weight, potent gases previous estimates by 14% (Etminan et al. like methane are driving significantly 2016). These well-regarded assessments will more heating of the atmosphere. Factoring inform the position taken by the IPCC in its these in, even in a basic way, sees an Sixth Assessment Report. upward revision to the calculated impact of methane of around 20% (Gillett & Matthews 2010; Sterner & Johansson 2017).

The full impact of methane varies considerably by source. 17 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Australia is vastly understating the true impact of its methane emissions, and consequently, the emissions of the gas industry.

Taking all of this into account means sources of methane, Australia’s total reported the Federal Government is vastly under- emissions would increase by a further 10% – reporting the impacts of methane, and so adding another Sweden to the planet as well, Australia’s overall emissions. Rather than even when using the government’s preferred being only 28 times worse than carbon 100-year time horizon. dioxide – as is now claimed by the Federal Government – a more complete and up-to- The accounting method used by Australia date analysis would show that methane is is allowable under international reporting up to 40 times more potent over a 100-year guidelines. However, by ignoring the period. Over 20 years, methane is nearly 100 difference between sources of methane, times more potent. subsequent scientific developments and flow-on effects of introducing methane Australia emits approximately 5 million into the atmosphere, Australia’s official tonnes of methane per year (Department reports vastly understate the true impact of of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources its methane emissions. This includes those 2020b). Recently announced adjustments – emissions from the gas industry. that take the GWP of methane from a value of 25 to a value of 28 – will add 3% to Australia’s As it is such a powerful greenhouse gas, total reported emissions. This will effectively small emissions of methane along the gas add another Papua New Guinea worth of supply chain have a considerable impact on emissions to Australia’s bottom line (Gütschow the total assessed impact of the gas industry. et al. 2019). However, if the adjustments had The emissions of unburned methane along been made using the latest science, and in a the gas supply chain are substantial, with the way that accurately accounts for the different Federal Government officially estimating that

Table 1: Global warming potential of methane relative to carbon dioxide. This table shows the relative shift in the energy balance of the atmosphere from the emission of one tonne of methane relative to one tonne of carbon dioxide. Sources: Myhre et al (2013) and Etminan et al (2016).

Default value Carbon cycle After Etminan et al. Time horizon (IPCC AR5) feedback (2016) revision

Fossil methane 20 years 85 87 99

100 years 30 36 40

Biogenic methane 20 years 84 86 98

100 years 28* 34 38

* Federal government’s preferred value for all sources of methane. CHAPTER 03 18 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

half a million tonnes of methane were released This makes recent trends in global directly into the atmosphere by the gas industry atmospheric methane concentrations even in the most recent reported year (Department more worrying. As shown below in Figure of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 7, while methane concentrations stabilised 2020b). These emissions are rapidly growing. early this century, they are trending upward again. Attributing this increase in global When put into the context of a large emitter methane concentrations to a single cause is like Australia this may seem to be a small difficult (Nisbet et al. 2019), but it is notable amount. However, on a carbon dioxide that it comes at a time of considerable equivalent basis, the Australian gas industry’s growth in the gas industry – both in emissions of just one greenhouse gas are Australia and around the world (International equivalent to the total emissions of Lithuania, Energy Agency 2020b; Office of the Chief a developed European nation (Gütschow et Economist 2020). As has been noted al. 2019). To make matters worse, as will be elsewhere, gas is now the fastest growing discussed in section 3.4, these official figures fossil fuel, and so one of the fastest growing are very likely to be underestimates for sources of greenhouse gas pollution. reasons unrelated to the GWP of methane.

Figure 7: Atmospheric methane concentrations (1984 – 2020). Data source: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (2020).

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE CONCENTRATIONS 1 22 )

4 1900

1850

1800

1750

1700

Monthly average

1650 12-month trend

Atmospheric methane concentrations (parts per billion CH 1600 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 19 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

3.3 The impacts of gas extraction depend on the method used

Not all sources of gas are equal when it or alongside coal and oil, but is ultimately comes to assessing the climate and other derived from deposits that are at least tens impacts of gas across the supply chain. of millions of years old. The presence of Different sources of gas come with different methane in coal seams and oil reservoirs, risks, and different rates of greenhouse and the inevitability of producing it at the gas pollution. While each individual same time that coal and oil are extracted, gas field will have unique features that means that coal and oil extraction facilities determine its overall climate impact, one often emit or flare large quantities of of the key points of difference is between methane through routine operations (see conventional and unconventional gas. This section 3.4). section steps through the various forms of gas extraction with a view to providing Reservoirs containing methane deep greater clarity on the topic. underground are frequently described as being either “conventional” or While the word ‘gas’ is sometimes used “unconventional”. While these terms are to describe biogas – which is produced often used as a shorthand to describe from vegetation and waste – or town-gas the technical aspects of extracting gas – which is produced in some countries from a reservoir, or even as a proxy from coal – most gas burned today is to describe the cost effectiveness of most accurately described as ‘fossil producing the gas, in a strict sense the methane’. This term applies to all gas terms merely describe whether the gas can produced from oil, gas or coal deposits. be extracted using traditional methods. While the gas burned in power stations If extracting the gas requires newer and homes contains some additives and methods, it is “unconventional”. Generally, impurities, this substance is mostly derived unconventional gas extraction is more from naturally-occurring reserves deep risky than conventional – though there underground. It can occur on its own, are exceptions, particularly with deep sea conventional gas extraction.

In conventional gas reservoirs, the methane sits in a naturally porous rock formation that is capped by a type of rock that does not allow the gas to escape naturally. If the impenetrable layer is drilled through then Different gas high pressures underground will push gas up to the surface. Australia’s existing extraction processes offshore gas reservoirs, such as those found in Bass Strait or off the coast of Western involve very different Australia, are all conventional, as are several of the onshore resources in Western levels of risk. Australia, South Australia and Queensland. CHAPTER 03 20 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

Unconventional gas describes methane › Shale gas holds methane in clay-rich, extracted from more complex geological layered rock formations known as formations that require greater intervention. shales. Within these shales, the gas is In Australia, the three main types of contained in small pores that do not unconventional gas formation that are either allow the gas to flow freely. Fracking is being used, or being considered, are coal almost always required to access shale seam gas, shale gas, and tight gas. gas in economically viable quantities. The proposed Betaloo Basin development in › Coal seam gas (CSG) holds methane the Northern Territory contains shale gas. adsorbed on underground coal seams. This gas is often held in place by rock and › Tight gas is similar to shale gas in most ancient groundwater (‘fossil water’). This ways, but the methane is found in water must be removed to access the gas, sandstone or limestone rather than shales. in a process known as ‘de-watering’. As a As with shale gas, tight gas extraction result, CSG poses significant risks for local almost always requires fracking. There is users of groundwater, including farmers very little tight gas production in Australia, and sensitive environments downstream, but several potential reserves have been if the water is extracted from the aquifers identified, including in the Darling Basin that farmers use or if produced water in western New South Wales. The Cooper is not managed appropriately. CSG Basin, which extends across the border extraction often uses fracking to increase of South Australia and Queensland and the supply of gas (see below), but this is currently produces significant quantities not always required. The large quantities of conventional gas, also holds significant of gas being extracted from Queensland’s amounts of tight gas. Some of this tight Surat Basin is CSG, as is the recently gas is being extracted. approved Narrabri Gas Project.

Figure 8: Unconventional gas extraction, such as that which is occurring in Queensland’s Western Downs, poses significant new risks to the local environment. 21 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Unconventional gas presents major risks to local communities.

While the consumption of fossil gas always are now several studies from Australia causes significant climate harm through and around the world that show clear the release of greenhouse gases (see 3.4), associations between a diverse range unconventional gas projects, which rely on of health impacts and proximity to extra steps such as de-watering, come with unconventional gas production hotspots additional direct risks to the communities including the Surat Basin in Queensland relying on the land and waters nearby (Jemielita et al. 2015; Werner et al. 2016; (Peduzzi & Harding Rohr Reis 2013). One Busby & Mangano 2017). These include of these processes is fracking. Fracking is higher incidence of congenital heart a process that injects immense quantities defects, increases in rates of asthma and of water, loaded with sand and potentially a host of other issues (Adgate, Goldstein harmful chemicals underground to crack & McKenzie 2014; Burton et al. 2014; open otherwise inaccessible gas reservoirs. McCarron 2018). This process can pose significant risks to local communities. Industry-led studies that rely on assessing the impact of unconventional gas If catastrophic incidents occur – such as a extraction at a handful of cherry-picked compromised well contaminating an aquifer wells misrepresent the problem (Australia as a result of negligence or accident – these Institute 2020b). Such studies cannot be may not be detected or even detectable until relied upon and there is an urgent need after the effects have already occurred and for comprehensive, well-funded and are irreparable. Alongside more dramatic truly independent basin-wide studies to risks - such as the risk of permanent understand the risks of unconventional gas. groundwater contamination - there are also insidious and chronic risks to communities living near unconventional gas operations that could be of even greater concern. There CHAPTER 03 22 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

3.4 What are ‘fugitive emissions’ and why are they so important in understanding the impact of gas?

Large releases of carbon dioxide and inadvertent releases of greenhouse gas, methane are a routine aspect of operating such as leaks (see, for example, American most forms of gas infrastructure. Petroleum Institute 2009). In the language of Cumulatively, this results in a large international climate science and diplomacy, additional burden on the global atmosphere. the term tends to refer to any unproductive As noted in Box 1, carbon dioxide is the release of greenhouse gases along the fossil most important greenhouse gas causing fuel supply chain, whether intentional or climate change. However, as noted in inadvertent (see, for example, Department of Section 3.2, methane is itself an extremely Environment and Energy 2019). potent warming agent and is the second most important greenhouse gas. Even small Regardless of which definition is used, it amounts of methane have an outsized is a simple fact that along the gas supply effect on the climate impacts that we are chain, carbon dioxide and methane are seeing today. The myriad of intentional and released in very large quantities: from inadvertent releases of greenhouse gas from production and processing, to transport the gas industry create a significant extra and end-use. Extracting any of the three climate burden as a result of gas extraction, major fossil fuels – coal, oil and gas – processing, transport and use. releases significant greenhouse gas emissions even before the fuel is burned The term ‘fugitive emissions’ has two quite (see Section 3.3). Proportionally speaking, distinct – and at times mutually-exclusive the gas supply chain emits significantly – definitions. In the language used by the more pre-combustion greenhouse gas per gas industry, the term is often limited to unit of energy in Australia than coal.

Even before gas is burned, large quantities of greenhouse gas pollution are released at every stage of the gas supply chain. 23 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

This section describes how the pre- gas production cycle. The mix of gases combustion emissions from gas are poorly released varies depending on the type of recorded in Australia’s climate accounting. venting, but the target for release is most However, as will be shown in section 3.5, often carbon dioxide, which naturally even using these incomplete assessments occurs alongside methane in underground the mismatch between the proportionally reservoirs. In these instances, carbon high levels of upstream emissions in gas dioxide must be removed from the and the smaller – though still large – methane to create saleable gas. When amount emitted from coal significantly this occurs, the process that extracts reduces the claimed climate benefit of the carbon dioxide also releases some shifting to gas in many instances. methane at the same time. If gas reservoirs have a high concentration of carbon There are four main kinds of upstream dioxide, the total volume of greenhouse emission in gas operations: gas released by venting can be substantial.

› Venting is the intentional release › Flaring burns gas at various points along of greenhouse gases directly to the the supply chain for various operational atmosphere at various stages of the reasons. Ordinarily, flaring occurs to reduce workplace hazards and other risks. Performed perfectly, flaring releases large amounts of carbon dioxide as the methane is burned, though small amounts of Figure 9: Emissions of greenhouse gas occur along the full unburned methane will always be present. gas supply chain, from extraction to consumption. As with all industrial process, reality may not always match expectation. Imperfectly configured flares can result in significant quantities of methane being released to the atmosphere unburned.

› Leakage is the result of accidental escapes of greenhouse gas, such as from cracked pipes or improperly maintained infrastructure. The official Federal Government methodologies for assessing the climate impact of leaks from the gas industry ultimately rely on standard account factors rather than direct measurement (see below).

› Migratory emissions are a poorly understood phenomenon where methane is released through natural fissures in the earth, far from the wellhead. These are a particular risk for unconventional gas extraction (Lafleur et al. 2016). The existence of migratory emissions is ignored in Australia’s official greenhouse gas emissions data. CHAPTER 03 24 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

Emissions of methane, both operational the gas sector, are based on the American and inadvertent, occur at every stage of Petroleum Institute’s Compendium of the gas supply chain; from extraction, to Greenhouse Account Factors for the Oil and processing, transport, and even at the point Gas Industry, which was last updated more of combustion. The reported quantity of than a decade ago (American Petroleum greenhouse gas pollution released by the Institute 2009; Department of Energy and gas industry is substantial. In the 2018 Environment 2019). While some more recent calendar year, the Australian gas industry assessments are included in the compendium, released at least half a million tonnes emissions from the gas industry are largely of methane directly to the atmosphere determined by a single report from the United unburned, directly released seven-and-a- States Environmental Protection Agency half million tonnes of carbon dioxide, and which assessed the climate impact of the produced another six-and-a-half million US gas industry in the 1992 calendar year tonnes of carbon dioxide as a result of flaring (Environmental Protection Agency (US) 1996). (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 2020b). This is separate to Recent studies have shown that the proportion the nearly three hundred million tonnes of of methane in the atmosphere as a result carbon dioxide produced when Australian of fossil fuel extraction is far higher than gas is burned at its final destination. previously estimated (Hmiel et al. 2020). This finding points to systemic under-reporting Australia emits far more than its share of of fossil fuel industry emissions of methane greenhouse gases each year (Robiou du across the world. Pont et al. 2016). On these official numbers, one twentieth – or 5% – of Australia’s total At a tiny handful of gas processing facilities contribution to climate change comes around the world, the amount of greenhouse from the gas industry’s venting and flaring gas vented to the atmosphere is reduced operations (Department of Industry, through processes that re-inject carbon Science, Energy and Resources 2020b). dioxide into geological formations – referred to as carbon capture and storage. For example, But this does not tell the full story, and may some of the carbon dioxide stripped at the be a significant underestimate. The impact Gorgon liquefied gas facility in Western of upstream emissions of greenhouse gases Australia is re-injected in this way. This project from the gas industry are poorly reported has been plagued by technical delays (Milne in Australia. In part, this is because instead 2020) and is underdelivering on its promised of directly measuring the climate impact emissions reductions (Kilvert 2020). Even if the of the industry, official estimates of the facility’s sequestration activities become fully gas industry’s emissions ultimately rely operational, it will nonetheless capture less on assessments conducted decades ago, than half of its overall emissions, and continue on a different continent, at a time when to emit millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas the unconventional gas industry was in each year (Chevron 2015). its infancy. The Federal Government’s National Greenhouse Account Factors, Ultimately, as both a greenhouse gas and a which are used to determine project- fossil fuel, gas is worsening climate change. level and national-scale emissions from 25 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

3.5 Gas-powered electricity generation in Australia

In Australia, there are several different › Open-cycle gas turbines: These gas gas-powered electricity generation generators are far more flexible, and able technologies in operation. These can be to respond to peaks in electricity supply or broadly classified as: demand. However, their flexibility comes at a climate cost as these generators are › Steam turbine gas generators: This older relatively inefficient compared to steam generation of power stations is designed to and combined cycle generators. As shown operate continuously at either full or part in Table 2 and Table 3, while the average load. Since the retirement of the Kwinana emissions of the current fleet are lower power station in Western Australia, there than Australia’s existing coal fleet, once are two remaining generators of this upstream emissions are accounted for kind in operation: Newport in Victoria several of Australia’s existing open-cycle and Torrens Island in South Australia generators are far more polluting, per (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020b). unit of electricity generated, than coal (see Table 3). With a few exceptions, these › Combined cycle gas turbines: While these high emitters tend to be used to manage stations still burn gas and contribute to extreme peaks in electricity demand and climate change, they are relatively efficient so produce few emissions in total. and their greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy are substantially lower › Reciprocating engines: Australia has than steam, open-cycle or reciprocating only one large gas-powered reciprocating gas turbines. Such turbines are an engine: the new Barker Inlet power station improvement over coal, even after co-located with the remaining units at upstream emissions are considered. While Torrens Island in South Australia, though combined cycle is considerably more many smaller reciprocating engines are in efficient than steam turbines, they are also service around the country. Reciprocating ill-suited to responding to rapid changes engines are even more flexible than in electricity supply or demand. This conventional open-cycle generators, limits their ability to support a grid with a and have a similar emissions intensity to high penetration of wind and solar power. newer open-cycle generators (AGL Energy Under AEMO’s modelling (see section 2017; Skinner 2020). 4.1), most Australian combined cycle gas generators are expected to retire over the The relative emissions intensity of each power coming decades without being replaced station technology is shown below in Table near the end of their service lives. 2, including direct and indirect emissions. CHAPTER 03 26 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

Table 2: Average emissions intensity of Australian power stations by fuel, including direct (scope 1) and indirect (scope 3) emissions. Source: Clean Energy Regulator (2020) and ACIL Allen (2016).2

Average direct emissions intensity Average direct and indirect Power station type (kg CO₂-e/MWh) emissions intensity (kg CO₂-e/MWh)

Brown coal (subcritical)3 1,204 1,209

Black coal (subcritical) 890 921

Black coal (supercritical) 858 869

Gas-fired steam turbine 562 692

Open cycle gas turbine 616 672

Reciprocating gas engine4 560 672

Combined cycle gas turbine 411 471

Hydro 0.6 0.6

Solar 0.6 0.6

Wind 0.4 0.4

Even setting aside that these emissions intensities rely on the official data and so – as discussed in section 3.4 – very likely underestimate indirect emissions from the facilities, it is immediately clear that not all gas generators are created equal.

2 Emissions intensities calculated using volume-weighted averages over the most recent four-year period, and including partial coverage of scope 3 emissions. Due to the lack of reliable data for the scope 3 emissions of generators operating on smaller grids, or used off-grid, this data includes only currently operating large generators connected to the National Electricity Market and Southwest Interconnected System.

3 The terms subcritical and supercritical – as well as the latest generation of ‘ultrasupercritical’ generators that do not exist in Australia – refers to the pressure of the water that is used to generate steam in a power station. Generally-speaking, higher pressures require higher temperatures and the higher temperatures mean that a station is more greenhouse gas efficient. While all coal-fired generators produce very significant quantities of greenhouse gas, there is some improvement between sub- and supercritical coal, and a further improvement between super- and ultrasupercritical. This improvement is insufficient to justify any new coal power stations in a carbon constrained world.

4 Barker Inlet Power Station, Australia’s one large gas-fired reciprocating engine, began operating in 2019, and is yet to report to the Clean Energy Regulator. These figures are taken from the project’s environmental impact statement (AGL Energy 2017). The relatively high contribution of upstream emissions for this generator is an artefact of the facts that the gas field supplying it has high carbon dioxide concentrations and because this generator is located very far from the gas fields that supply it. This is not an indication of anything specific to the technology. Figure 10: Australia’s fleet of open-cycle generators, like Jeeralang B shown above, are very significantly less efficient than other forms of generation, and can be as emissions intensive as coal-fired generators.

The oft-repeated claim that gas can turbines and reciprocating engines, have produce electricity at half of the higher emissions per unit of electricity emissions intensity of coal and support generated. Fortunately, they produce less the deployment of renewables can emissions overall simply because they are only be true when certain kinds of coal not run often. On top of this, while the are compared to certain kinds of gas. average emissions intensity of different Currently, some existing gas is required technologies provides some context, to firm up renewables, and the generators even within individual technologies, the that are best able to ramp up and down performance of individual generators to meet peaks and troughs in renewable varies considerably. energy supply, like open-cycle gas CHAPTER 03 28 GAS MAKES A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS

Table 3 shows the emissions intensity of intensive in the world (International Energy Australia’s ten least efficient open-cycle Agency 2020a) (Australian Energy Market gas turbines. All of these are comparable to Operator 2020c). Australia’s fleet of coal fired power stations. These peaking power stations, which are Each of these generators are open cycle expected to be rarely used over the next 20 turbines and all except Pinjar A and B years and so do not require large quantities operate as true ‘peaking’ facilities – meaning of gas, can be run using existing gas supplies they backup the grid in case of shortfalls (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020a). in supply, and are not often used. These With Australia exporting three times as much generators are expensive to run. Australian gas as it uses in any given year (see section electricity is among the most emissions 3.1), they do not require new gas fields.

Table 3: A comparison of Australia’s least efficient gas-fired power stations and the existing coal fleet.Data source: Clean Energy Regulator (2020), ACIL Allen Consulting (2016).5

Emissions intensity Name Ultimate owner State (kg CO₂ e/MWh)6 Notes

Barcaldine Queensland Qld 2,430 Australia’s dirtiest gas power station Government(1)

Yallourn Energy Australia Vic 1,320 Australia’s dirtiest coal-fired power station

Dry Creek Engie/Mitsui SA 1,227

Hallet Energy Australia SA 1,167

West Kalgoorlie WA Government(2) WA 1,078

Mintaro Engie/Mitsui SA 923

Pinjar A & B WA Government(2) WA 869

Mungarra WA Government(2) WA 845

Valley Power Federal Vic 840 Government(3)

Millmerran InterGen Qld 832 Australia’s most efficient coal-fired power station

Jeeralang A & B Energy Australia Vic 819

Somerton AGL Vic 791

(1) Via Ergon Energy (2) Via Synergy (3) Via Snowy Hydro

5 This list only includes power stations connected to either the National Electricity Market or the South West Interconnected System.

6 Emissions intensities determined using cumulative generation and emissions data for financial year 2016–2019 as reported by Clean Energy Regulator (2020). Scope 3 emissions intensities used from ACIL Allen Consulting (2016). 29 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

BOX 2: THE TRANSITION FUEL MYTH

Hypothetically, a coal-to-gas transition could If there is competition today among the fossil fuel deliver a slight, one time reduction in annual generators it is between existing gas generators greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity and proposed new facilities. As shown in Table sector (International Energy Agency 2019) using 3, many in Australia’s fleet of existing generators Federal Government estimates of the impact of are relatively greenhouse gas intensive. However, gas. However, if the full climate impact of gas is most of these have been fully paid off, and can be considered – including accurate measurement closed as soon as the zero emissions alternatives of indirect emissions as well as accurately are ready. In contrast, any new generator will be calculating the total contribution of released built with the expectation that it will continue methane to the warming of the atmosphere – this operation for several decades in order to pay for would substantially reduce the claimed climate the costs of construction. benefit. In many cases it would eliminate it. Taken together, this shows that even where a What proponents of the coal-to-gas switch also marginal improvement in emissions efficiency overlook is that coal is already in structural between old and new exists, newer and decline in Australia. Every second year, the notionally more efficient gas generators will Australian Energy Market Operator extensively likely emit more than old generators over their models the future of Australia’s largest grid – remaining operating lives. A one-off reduction the National Electricity Market – to produce in emissions from replacing a coal-fired power roadmaps for the possible future of the grid over station with a gas replacement counts for little the next two decades. The most recent iteration if the replacement has an operating life that is of this Integrated System Plan forecasts that twice as long. Chasing such negligible benefits between 40% and 95% of coal-fired generation will most likely stall, rather than facilitate, the capacity will retire over the next 20 years, with no necessary transition to zero emissions. new coal-fired generator built to replace it. At the same time, the amount of gas-fired generation capacity in the grid, and the use of those generators, is expected to decrease over time.

On top of this, building new gas generators, without taking additional steps to close coal-fired generators, can only add to the total greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector. For gas to play a transitioning role, there would need to be a plan to close coal-fired generators. And as will be shown in the next section, there are more than enough gas-fired generators currently available to support the grid as renewables rapidly increase and more zero-emissions dispatchable supply – such as batteries and pumped hydro – comes online. CHAPTER 04 30 A BETTER WAY TO SUPPORT WIND AND SOLAR

4. A better way to support wind and solar

In latest Integrated System Plan for As wind and solar generation rapidly the National Electricity Market (NEM), increases, driving emission reductions across the Australian Energy Market Operator the grid, most of Australia’s fleet of relatively forecasts a steadily shrinking role for inflexible combined cycle gas turbines and gas over the next 20 years (Australian gas-fired steam generators will retire. In most Energy Market Operator 2020a). The scenarios, the cheapest way to manage the plan outlines a series of future options grid results in more than two-thirds of these for the grid across a range of different generators retiring within the next 20 years. possible futures. Five scenarios are In four out of five scenarios, the least-cost outlined for the NEM - Australia’s largest path is for this to occur relatively soon and electricity grid, which supplies all of without replacement. The one scenario that Victoria, Tasmania and the Australian does include new combined cycle generators Capital Territory, along with the major still forecasts that overall installed capacity of populated regions of New South Wales, these generators falls by more than one-third Queensland and South Australia. (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020a).

The relatively high-emitting, but more flexible, open cycle generators remain under most scenarios, but are only used in short bursts to meet peaks in demand and occasional troughs in supply. This loosely matches the way most of these generators operate today, though they are likely to be used much less often (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020a).

While concerns about wind and solar power variability are often exaggerated, managing this presents genuine challenges. Luckily, The gas prices these are challenges with obvious solutions. The Australian Energy Market Operator notes required for gas to that gas would only play an increased role in firming the grid if it can outcompete zero outcompete zero emissions solution, such as batteries and pumped hydro, on price (Australian Energy emissions firming Market Operator 2020a). Such gas prices – which must remain in the $4-6 per gigajoule solutions appear range and be sustained over decades – appear to be unachievable in the regions unachievable. connected to Australia’s largest grid. 31 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

The Australian Petroleum Production and These five options allow electricity supply Exploration Association – the main lobby and demand to be intelligently managed group representing gas producers – has throughout the day so that daily peaks described the possibility of prices ever and troughs in supply and demand are returning to this level as a ‘myth’ and smoothed. Dispatchable storage solutions noted that 90% of proven and provable gas such as large-scale batteries and pumped reserves across the east of the country have hydro smooth spikes in electricity supply a lifecycle cost higher than this (Australian by storing electricity when it is in excess, Petroleum Production and Exploration and returning it to the grid at times when it Association 2020). is needed most. Demand side participation options, including distributed batteries, Along with careful planning of new virtual power plants and smart devices, shift infrastructure – particularly the construction the demand for electricity to match periods of new transmission to ensure energy is of higher supply. moved around the grid efficiently – the 2020 Integrated System Plan prefers an array of Under the scenarios in the Integrated System zero emissions solutions including: Plan, the principal periods where gas might still be required would be to manage periods 1. Pumped hydroelectricity, when several days of calm, cloudy weather affects a large share of the grid’s wind and 2. Large-scale battery energy storage solar generators. systems, Zero emissions solutions such as those 3. Distributed batteries, listed above are expected to drastically reduce the role for gas in the electricity 4. Virtual power plants, and grid. Incentivising gas-powered generation will add costs and provide disincentives to 5. Other demand side participation. smarter and more affordable solutions for managing a large electricity network in the 21st century. CHAPTER 04 32 A BETTER WAY TO SUPPORT WIND AND SOLAR

4.1 The declining role of gas

The role of gas in Australia’s electricity grid (Department of Industry, Science, Energy will shrink as increases. and Resources 2020a). In the long-term, renewables and storage will meet almost all of Australia’s electricity Despite record levels of deployment of needs. The key question today is: ‘How fast renewables in recent years (Clean Energy can the required transition occur?’ Council 2020), black and brown coal still provide most of the power travelling Australia’s energy supply is currently through Australia’s electricity networks at dominated by fossil fuels (Department of 56%. Gas provides 21% and 2% comes from Industry, Science, Energy and Resources the consumption of liquid fossil fuels like 2020a). While gas is used in many other diesel. More than one-fifth of Australia’s sectors of Australia’s overall energy mix (see electricity comes from wind, solar and section 3.1), the largest share of domestic gas hydro-electric generation (Department of consumption occurs in the electricity sector. Industry, Science, Energy and Resources This sector is responsible for nearly one 2020d). This can be seen below in Figure 11.7 third of Australia’s overall gas consumption

Figure 11: Australian electricity generation by fuel source, financial years.Data source: Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (2020d).

AUSTRALIAN ELECTRICITY GENERATION BY FUEL SOURCE FINANCIAL YEARS

300

250

200

150

100

Electricity generated (TWh) 50

0 1 1 1 7 7 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 9 6 9 6 9 6 8 8 8 0 0 0 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 9 1 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Coal Gas Diesel and other sources Hydro Wind Solar

7 This data includes all of Australia’s small grid and off-grid generation, much of which is gas. 33 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Not so long ago, virtually all plans to It may once have been thought necessary transition to a zero-emissions world to shift from a coal-dominated electricity included a temporary growth in gas- grid to a gas-dominated electricity grid in powered generation. However, more Australia on the way to a zero-emissions recent analyses – such as the scenarios future. These transitions have occurred developed by the Australian Energy elsewhere in the world, such as in the Market Operator – paint a very different UK and USA. For Australia, as we head picture. The seismic shift in the further into the 21st century, making such economics of renewables and storage a transition is not only unnecessary, but has re-written the rules. In the sunniest far more expensive than choosing a lower and windiest inhabited continent emissions pathway (Australian Energy (Geosciences Australia 2019), wind and Market Operator 2020a). There are other, solar powered generation is the cheapest significantly cheaper ways to stabilise the form of new electricity generating electricity grid in 2020 than by increasing infrastructure, and remains so even when the share of fossil fuel use. factoring in storage (Graham et al. 2018). For the most part, Australia’s energy market There are many individual factors that operator forecasts the cheapest paths will underpin this new reality. The cost of bypass new coal and gas infrastructure wind and solar generation infrastructure (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020a). has rapidly reduced and the options The most ambitious scenario results in to manage the high penetration of nearly 95% of coal-fired generation capacity renewables have improved (Australian retiring within the next two decades, as wind Energy Market Operator 2020a). The cost and solar generation capacity more than of the core components of lithium ion triples. Storage capacity in the grid increases batteries, used for battery storage, have nearly ten times over. Around half of all gas- fallen by nearly 90% in the past decade, powered generators would retire over the from $1,100 per kilowatt hour in 2010 to same period, with those that remain only $156/kWh in 2019 (BloombergNEF 2019). used in short bursts during peak periods.

Under this scenario, greenhouse gas emissions from the generation of electricity for the National Electricity Market are 95% lower than today. The relative proportion of installed electricity generators in Australia’s largest grid is shown below in Figure 12.

A seismic shift in the economics of energy has made gas redundant in the energy transition. CHAPTER 04 34 A BETTER WAY TO SUPPORT WIND AND SOLAR

The reality is that a well-managed transition and the southwest of Western Australia – or to zero emissions firming solutions in the the Darwin Katherine Interconnected System electricity grid will be significantly cheaper – powering the most heavily populated than a gas powered route. In the long term, regions of the Northern Territory – presents this will require fewer gas generators than other challenges and opportunities, but the are connected to the grid today, and these same economics apply there as in Australia’s generators will likely be operating much less largest grid. often. Managing this transition will not be simple, but will be simpler if planning begins Decarbonising Australia’s electricity networks now, rather than on an ad hoc basis over the is now a matter of co-ordination, planning next several decades. and political will. In a country that has already lost so much to the impacts of climate change, Managing the transition to renewables in and that stands to lose much more if we don’t Australia’s smaller grids like the South West address this crisis, there is a pressing need to Interconnected System – powering Perth get on with the job.

Figure 12: Installed capacity by generation type under the Integrated System Plan’s most ambitious scenario. Source: Australian Energy Market Operator (2020a).

INSTALLED CAPACITY BY GENERATION TYPE UNDER THE STEP CHANGE SCENARIO DEELOPMENT PATHWAY

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20 Installed capacity of generation types (gigawatts) 0 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042

Coal Gas Hydro Storage Wind Solar 35 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

BOX 3: SOUTH AUSTRALIA LEADS THE WAY

Between 2005 and 2025, South Australia will by 50% (Australian Renewable Energy Agency have transformed its electricity system from 2020). This battery reduced South Australian having virtually no solar or wind generation electricity consumers costs by $116 million in 2019 to having more than 85%; resulting in cheaper (Aurecon 2020). Several synchronous condensers8 and cleaner power for its residents. This makes to enhance grid security are currently being added, South Australia a global leader, and shows the further reducing gas power needs and costs by rest of the country what can be achieved with over $20 million per year (ElectraNet 2019). sustained leadership. On a per person basis, the state is a leader in Fifteen years ago, South Australia was completely household solar with over 1200 MW installed reliant on coal and gas for its electricity supply. and leads the nation in the rollout of household Today, while the state still uses some gas, more battery systems to create a virtual power plant9 than 57% of its electricity already comes from (RenewEconomy 2019). renewable sources (OpenNEM 2020), with much more on the way (Australian Energy Market After an interconnector is built to NSW in 2024, Operator 2020a). renewable electricity facilities in South Australia will supply 85% – 90% of the state’s annual Industry has invested more than $7 billion electricity demand, reducing gas consumption since 2004 (RenewEconomy 2019) and built for power generation by 80% (Australian Energy 2500 megawatts (MW) of large-scale wind and Market Operator 2020a). These renewable power solar in the state, an amount that is more than stations will also export considerable volumes of enough to compensate for the complete closure surplus electricity into New South Wales. Fuel cost of the state’s coal industry. While the state used savings will exceed $200-300 million per year, to rely on importing Victoria’s coal electricity, overall electricity costs will be $180 million lower since 2017 South Australia has become a net per year for NSW customers, and SA consumers electricity exporter (OpenNEM 2020). Recently, will each save $100 per year on their power bills the average wholesale electricity price was lower (Project Energy Connect 2020a, 2020b). in South Australia than in New South Wales, Victoria or Tasmania (Australian Energy Market South Australian governments of both major Operator 2020d). political parties have recognised the considerable advantages arising from being an early mover on To shore up reliable power supplies, the state renewable energy, and have provided a continuous, again led the world by installing the largest-ever stable policy and investment framework for grid scale battery at Hornsdale in 2017. Since its industry and consumers in the state (Climate installation the battery has been further expanded Council 2019b). All have reaped the benefits.

South Australia’s transition to renewable energy is dramatically reducing the price of energy for consumers today.

8 A synchronous condenser is essentially a large spinning machine connected to the grid, similar in function to a free spinning motor. Synchronous condensers are one solution to ensuring a stable supply of electricity through the network. While there are other means to achieve this stability in grids with a high share of renewables, synchronous condensers are one important solution. Other options, such as inverters, are able to play a similar role.

9 In a virtual power plant, the operation of a large number of solar and battery storage systems is controlled through software by an electricity retailer. This enables the generation, charge and discharge of the solar panels and batteries to be coordinated so that, together, the systems effectively operate as a power plant. CHAPTER 04 36 A BETTER WAY TO SUPPORT WIND AND SOLAR

4.2 Australians pay a high price for gas

Despite promises from the Federal BOOM AND BUST Government of economic benefits from gas, price volatility and the industry’s low Australia’s enlarged gas industry has levels of employment mean the industry is increasingly exposed the country to the not delivering clear benefits to Australians. boom-and-bust cycles that affect the global Unprecedented growth in the export gas oil and gas market. The wholesale price of gas industry has driven up the price of gas in reached record highs for most Australians Australia over the past few years. Today, between 2016 and 2019 (Australian Energy after a gas price crash, the global gas Regulator 2020a, 2020b), before plummeting industry is reeling from historically low as a result of a global supply glut in late 2019 prices, and yet these savings are not being (International Energy Agency 2020c). passed on to Australian consumers. As a result of this, gas cannot be relied on Relying on the gas industry for employment to provide stable energy prices. The growth would be unwise even under the best in gas exports and Australia’s increased economic conditions. Australia has just exposure to the international market doubled sufferred its first recession in 29 years as the price of gas in Australia between the 2016 a result of the response to COVID-19 (BBC and 2017 calendar years in Queensland, New News 2020). The gas industry employs very South Wales, Victoria and South Australia few Australians, both on an absolute basis (Australian Energy Regulator 2020a, 2020b). and as a share of revenues compared to The entry into the market of three new other industries (Australia Institute 2020a). liquefied gas export terminals on Curtis In contrast, pursuing a clean recovery Island, near Gladstone, was a major factor. with good, sustainable jobs that also solve These terminals immediately began to buy long term problems like climate change large quantities of gas from the domestic would provide far more economic benefits market in order to top up their own supply (AlphaBeta & Climate Council 2020). shortfalls (Llewellyn-Smith 2020; ABC News 2020). This sudden price spike placed Australia’s manufacturing sector under immense pressure and threatened thousands of previously stable Australian jobs (ABC News 2020).

Most Australians were hit by record high energy prices in recent years due to spikes in the price of gas. Figure 13: Opening up Australia’s gas export industry exposed Australian jobs in gas-industry reliant sectors to the boom and bust cycle of the global market. These jobs are now inherently vulnerable.

In the first half of 2020, the global gas risk as far back as 2017 in its annual World market went into ‘meltdown’ (International Energy Outlook. The gas exported from Energy Agency 2020c) as a global glut in Australia’s east coast terminals is among the supply of gas took hold (HSBC Global the most expensive to produce in the world, Research 2020). This was exacerbated by and is unlikely to be profitable at projected an oil price war between Saudi Arabia and prices (see Figure 14, below). Across the Russia which further drove down the global world, hundreds of billions of dollars have price of gas (Padilla 2020). The combined been sunk into liquefied gas infrastructure, impact of these factors, along with and this investment is now in jeopardy COVID-19, resulted in 40% of Australian (Plante et al. 2020). oil and gas jobs being lost in the space of a month in 2020 (Australian Bureau of The three Curtis Island liquefied gas Statistics 2020). This rate of job loss meant facilities are, in the words of one of the the oil and gas sector was the hardest hit in world’s largest banks, ‘at risk’ (HSBC Global the immediate aftermath of COVID-19. In Research 2020). The first signs of this are the months since this initial shock, some evident in a record drop in Australia’s of these jobs have returned. However, gas exports. Between April and June this this hints at a core vulnerability of the year, liquefied gas exports declined by 16% Australian gas sector today. (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 2020e). While this is clearly Prominent analysts of the global market linked to COVID-19, and there has been expect the oversupply of gas to continue some recovery in exported volumes since it through most of the next decade (HSBC remains to be seen whether – and by how Global Research 2020). This oversupply has much – the price will recover given that been predicted for several years, with the several of the trends driving low gas prices International Energy Agency raising the appear to be long-term and systemic. CHAPTER 04 38 A BETTER WAY TO SUPPORT WIND AND SOLAR

Figure 14: Breakeven point of eastern Australian gas export facilities (red) versus competitors (grey) and the current futures price in the two largest importing markets. Converted from: HSBC (2020).

BREAEEN POINT OF EASTERN AUSTRALIAN GAS EXPORT FACILITIES ERSUS COMPETITORS AND THE CURRENT FUTURES PRICE IN THE TWO LARGEST IMPORTING MARETS

$9/GJ

$8/GJ Eastern Australian liquefied gas terminals Asian gas futures for 2020 (JKM) $7/GJ European gas futures for 2020 (TTF)

$6/GJ

$5/GJ

$4/GJ

Australian dollars $3/GJ

$2/GJ

$1/GJ

$0/GJ NWS Pluto Adgas Yamal NLNG MLNG Brunei Rasgas Algeria Ichthys Gorgon Snohvit Freeport Bontang Qatargas Tangguh Cameron PNG LNG Wheatston Sakhalin-2 Cove Point Oman LNG Sabine Pass Angola LNG Atlantic LNG Corpus Christi Gladstone LNG Australia Pacific LNG Queensland Curtis LNG 39 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

The volatility of the gas price, which went Furthermore, recent analysis by the from boom to bust in just a few years, Australian Competition and Consumer shows precisely why gas cannot be relied Commission found worrying signs on for economic recovery in Australia that Australians are being overcharged as the country navigates a path out of when buying Australian gas (Australian COVID-19 (Climate Council 2020a). All Competition and Consumer Commission Australian jobs that are reliant on gas – 2020). In a trend the Commission’s whether in extraction of the fossil fuel or most recent interim report described in sectors that are significant users of gas as ‘extremely concerning’, Australian – are now increasingly vulnerable to the gas producers operating on the east volatile international market for oil and gas. coast charged Australian gas consumers significantly more than they would receive Historically, Australian households and from selling that same gas overseas businesses have been insulated from the (Australian Competition and Consumer volatile international market for oil and Commission 2020). The Commission’s gas, but the recent boom in liquefied gas report also identified that since global gas exports means that the country’s economy prices began to fall, the gap between the is exposed like never before to these global prices paid by international and domestic forces (McConnell & Sandiford 2020). There users of Australian gas has been growing. is no good reason that Australians should That is, while the global crash in gas prices continue to suffer exposure to high priced has significantly reduced prices for overseas electricity and gas when there are cheaper, users of Australian gas, the drop in price for cleaner alternatives, such as wind and solar, Australian users of Australian gas has been backed by storage. much smaller.

Ultimately, this directly affects all energy users, even those that do not use significant quantities of gas. The price of gas is one of the strongest influences on the wholesale price of electricity in Australia (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020e). Where the price of gas goes, the price of electricity tends to follow (McConnell & Sandiford 2020).

Exposure to the international gas market means Australian jobs that rely on gas are now inherently vulnerable. CHAPTER 05 40 A CHEAPER, CLEANER, MORE RELIABLE FUTURE

5. A cheaper, cleaner, more reliable future

Globally, the use of gas has grown Thankfully, given the contribution gas makes significantly in recent decades to driving climate change, this looks set to (International Energy Agency 2020d). change. As outlined in section 4.1, recent Annual consumption of the fossil fuel modelling by the Australian Energy Market has been rapidly approaching coal and Operator shows that domestic use of gas for it is now one of the fastest growing electricity is likely to steadily decline over the sources of greenhouse gas pollution next two decades (Australian Energy Market (International Energy Agency 2020c; Operator 2020a). Saunois et al. 2020). At a time when Australia is already experiencing the devastating impacts of climate change there is a powerful need for the country to move away from the use of coal, oil and gas. In industries where gas can be replaced by zero emissions sources, such as the electricity sector (Australian Energy Market Operator 2020a) and in many industrial heat applications (Lord 2018), gas consumption should be eliminated wherever possible.

While a full transition will take time, many Australian homes are already able to move completely away from fossil fuels by taking cost-saving energy efficiency measures and replacing household appliances with more efficient electric alternatives (Domain 2019). These alternatives include induction cooktops, heat pumps for space and water heating or a combination of solar hot water and reverse cycle heating.

Australia needs to urgently move away from all fossil fuels, including gas. 41 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Australia is one of the world’s biggest greenhouse gas polluters, both at home and overseas. On an absolute basis, it is the world’s 14th highest emitter, meaning Australia adds more to the global climate burden than 181 other countries each year (Gütschow et al. 2019). Per person, Australia emits more than any other developed country in the world (Climate Council 2020a).

Alongside the massive climate harm done within its shores, Australia is also a globally significant exporter of fossil fuels. In 2019, Australia was the largest exporter of liquefied gas, the largest exporter of metallurgical coal and the second largest exporter of thermal coal (Office of the Chief Economist 2020). On an extraction basis – that is by assigning to each country the emissions of all fossil fuels extracted on its shores – Australia is the fifth largest climate polluter in the world (Australia Institute 2019) despite having less than 0.3% percent of the world’s population.

Despite frequently overstated claims of a climate benefit from using gas, as shown in section 3, the reality is that over its life cycle gas can be more polluting than other fossil fuels. Even where short-term benefits might exist, building new gas infrastructure locks in decades of pollution, and delays zero- emission alternatives. The debate around the relative benefit of gas to coal obscures a vital point: gas has no more of a role to play in Australia’s zero emissions future than any other fossil fuel.

Figure 15: Limiting future climate harm means no new gas in Australia. CHAPTER 05 42 A CHEAPER, CLEANER, MORE RELIABLE FUTURE

The sooner the world reaches net zero The Black Summer of 2019/20 was a stark emissions, and the less greenhouse gas reminder of the deadly consequences of that is emitted along the way, the less the failure to drive down global greenhouse heating will be experienced (Rogelj et al. gas emissions. Australia has a unique 2018) and, ultimately, the less harm done opportunity to set itself up for the future by to the ecosystems that underpin human creating clean jobs and investing in climate wellbeing (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2018). solutions that kick-start the economy and Minimising climate harm requires moving tackle climate change simultaneously. away from all fossil fuels. While countries like Australia – with considerable wealth New or expanded gas infrastructure has no and every possible natural advantage – role to play in this future. continue to burn, produce and export fossil fuels, devastating climate impacts are intensifying. This adversely affects Australians, their economy and the natural environment.

Big emitters like Australia need to lead the charge to a net zero emissions future. 43 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

References

ABC News 2020, ‘Cheap gas, really? Why gas — from coal Australia Institute 2020, Gas Fired Backfire: Why a “gas fired seams or ships — may not mean low power prices’, The recovery” would increase emissions and energy costs and Business (ABC News), accessed May 4, 2020, from . backfire%20%5Bweb%5D.pdf>. Abram, NJ, Wright, NM, Ellis, B, Dixon, BC, Wurtzel, JB, Australia Institute 2020b, CSIR…who? A closer look at recent England, MH, Ummenhofer, CC, Philibosian, B, Cahyarini, research on coal seam gas environmental impacts, accessed SY, Yu, T-L, Shen, C-C, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL & Heslop, D from . last millennium’, Nature, vol. 579, no. 7799, pp. 385–392. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2020, Weekly Payroll Jobs ACIL Allen Consulting 2016, Emissions Factors and Wages in Australia - Payroll jobs index by Industry Assumptions Update (Final Report), accessed from . aemo-emissions-factors-20160511.pdf>. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Adgate, JL, Goldstein, BD & McKenzie, LM 2014, ‘Potential 2020, Gas inquiry 2017–2025, accessed from . Science & Technology, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 8307–8320. Australian Energy Market Operator 2020a, 2020 Integrated AGL Energy 2017, Barker Inlet Power Station Environmental System Plan, accessed May 28, 2020, from . data/assets/pdf_file/0005/369977/010.V067.17_AGL_-_ Australian Energy Market Operator 2020b, Generating Unit Part_2_-_environemntal_and_social_assessment_report. Expected Closure Year, accessed from . au/en/energy-systems/electricity/national-electricity- AlphaBeta & Climate Council 2020, Clean Jobs Plan, market-nem/nem-forecasting-and-planning/forecasting- accessed from . resources/clean-jobs-plan/>. Australian Energy Market Operator 2020c, Carbon Dioxide American Petroleum Institute 2009, Compendium of Equivalent Intensity Index, accessed from . intensity-index>. ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies 2020, Australian Energy Market Operator 2020d, Quarterly Energy Climate change triggers Great Barrier Reef bleaching, Dynamics Q3 2020, accessed October 29, 2020, from accessed June 19, 2020, from . reef-bleaching>. Australian Energy Market Operator 2020e, Quarterly Energy Aurecon 2020, ‘Hornsdale Power Reserve Impact Dynamics Q2 2020, accessed from

Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Climate Council 2019b, State of Play: Renewable Energy Association 2020, Australian Gas Price: Myths and Facts, Leaders and Losers, accessed from . fact-sheet-1.pdf>. Climate Council 2020a, Primed for Action: A resilient Australian Renewable Energy Agency 2020, ‘South recovery for Australia, accessed from . blog/south-australian-battery-grows-bigger-and-better/>. Climate Council 2020b, Summer of Crisis, accessed from BBC News 2020, ‘Australia in first recession for nearly . business-53994318>. CSIRO & Bureau of Meteorology 2020, State of the Climate Biddle, N, Edwards, B, Herz, D & Makkai, T 2020, Exposure 2020, Commonwealth of Australia, accessed from . Bushfires, ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods. Department of Energy and Environment 2019, BloombergNEF 2019, ‘Battery Pack Prices Fall As Market National Greenhouse Accounts Factors: August 2019, Ramps Up With Market Average At $156/kWh In 2019’, Commonwealth of Australia, accessed September 13, 2020, accessed August 18, 2020, from . market-average-at-156-kwh-in-2019/>. Department of Environment and Energy 2019, Australia’s Boucher, O, Friedlingstein, P, Collins, B & Shine, KP Emissions Projections 2019, accessed from . Bureau of Meteorology 2020a, ‘Monthly Drought Statement’, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources accessed July 23, 2020, from . of Australia, accessed from . Bureau of Meteorology 2020b, ‘Trends and extremes’, Climate Change, accessed November 19, 2019, from . System (AGEIS)’, accessed from . Burton, GA, Basu, N, Ellis, BR, Kapo, KE, Entrekin, S & Nadelhoffer, K 2014, ‘Hydraulic “Fracking”: Are surface Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources water impacts an ecological concern?’, Environmental 2020c, Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1679–1689. bushfires in Australia’s temperate forests: focus on 2019-20, Commonwealth of Australia, accessed from . gov.au/>. Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources Chevron 2015, Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz 2020d, ‘Australian Energy Statistics, Table O Electricity Feed Gas Pipeline: Greenhouse Gas Abatement Program, generation by fuel type 2018-19 and 2019’, accessed from accessed from . 2018-19-and-2019>. Clean Energy Council 2020, Clean Energy Australia report Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 2020, accessed from . australian-petroleum-statistics-2020>. Clean Energy Regulator 2020, Electricity sector Domain 2019, ‘The kitchen appliance that will become emissions and generation data, accessed from . thing-of-the-past-because-of-climate-change-917526/>. Climate Council 2019a, This Is What Climate Change Looks Like, accessed from . 45 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

ElectraNet 2019, Addressing the System Strength Gap in SA, Hansen, J, Sato, M, Russell, G & Kharecha, P 2013, ‘Climate accessed October 29, 2020, from . Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 371, no. 2001, p. 20120294. Enright, NJ, Fontaine, JB, Bowman, DM, Bradstock, RA & Williams, RJ 2015, ‘Interval squeeze: altered fire regimes Hawkins, E, Ortega, P, Suckling, E, Schurer, A, Hegerl, G, and demographic responses interact to threaten woody Jones, P, Joshi, M, Osborn, TJ, Masson-Delmotte, V, Mignot, species persistence as climate changes’, Frontiers in J, Thorne, P & van Oldenborgh, GJ 2017, ‘Estimating Ecology and the Environment, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 265–272. Changes in Global Temperature since the Preindustrial Period’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. Environmental Protection Agency (US) 1996, Methane 98, no. 9, pp. 1841–1856. Emissions from the Natural Gas Industry, accessed from . AM, Place, PF, Harth, C, Beaudette, R, Hua, Q, Yang, B, Vimont, I, Michel, SE, Severinghaus, JP, Etheridge, D, Etminan, M, Myhre, G, Highwood, EJ & Shine, KP 2016, Bromley, T, Schmitt, J, Faïn, X, Weiss, RF & Dlugokencky, E ‘Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous 2020, ‘Preindustrial 14CH indicates greater anthropogenic oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative 4 fossil CH4 emissions’, Nature, vol. 578, no. 7795, forcing’, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 43, no. 24, p. pp. 409–412. 12,614-12,623. Hoegh-Guldberg, O, Bindi, M, Brown, S, Camilloni, Fairman, TA, Bennett, LT, Tupper, S & Nitschke, CR 2017, I, Diedhiou, A, Djalante, R, Ebi, KL, Engelbrecht, F, ‘Frequent wildfires erode tree persistence and alter stand Guangsheng, Z, Guiot, J, Hijioka, Y, Mehrotra, S, Payne, structure and initial composition of a fire-tolerant sub- A, Seneviratne, SI, Thomas, A & Warren, R 2018, ‘Impacts alpine forest’ D Ward (ed), Journal of Vegetation Science, of 1.5°C of Global Warming on Natural and Human vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1151–1165. Systems’, in V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, H-O Pörtner, D Filkov, AI, Ngo, T, Matthews, S, Telfer, S & Penman, TD Roberts, J Skea, PR Shukla, A Pirani, W Moufouma-Okia, 2020, ‘Impact of Australia’s catastrophic 2019/20 bushfire C Péan, R Pidcock, S Connors, JBR Matthews, Y Chen, season on communities and environment. Retrospective X Zhou, MI Gomis, E Lonnoy, T Maycock, M Tignor, & T analysis and current trends’, Journal of Safety Science and Waterfield (eds), Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Resilience, vol. 1, pp. 44–56. Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas Forster, P, Ramaswamy, V, Artaxo, P, Berntsen, T, Betts, emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the R, Fahey, DW, Haywood, J, Lean, J, Lowe, DC, Myhre, G, global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable Nganga, J, Prinn, R, Raga, G, Schulz, M & Van Dorland, development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, World R 2007, ‘Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Radiative Forcing’, in S Solomon, D Qin, M Manning, accessed from . Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, M Tignor, & HL Miller (eds), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. HSBC Global Research 2020, Global Gas: A deflated market, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment accessed from . Cambridge University Press. Hughes, TP, Kerry, JT, Baird, AH, Connolly, SR, Dietzel, A, Geosciences Australia 2019, ‘Australian Energy Resources Eakin, CM, Heron, SF, Hoey, AS, Hoogenboom, MO, Liu, G, Assessment’, accessed May 4, 2020, from . JS & Torda, G 2018, ‘Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages’, Nature, vol. 556, no. 7702, pp. 492–496. Gillett, NP & Matthews, HD 2010, ‘Accounting for carbon cycle feedbacks in a comparison of the global warming International Energy Agency 2019, World Energy Outlook effects of greenhouse gases’, Environmental Research 2019, accessed from . Graham, PW, Hayward, J, Foster, J, Story, O & Havas, L 2018, International Energy Agency 2020a, ‘Data and Statistics’, GenCost 2018: Updated projections of electricity generation accessed July 15, 2020, from . publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?pid=csiro:EP189502>. International Energy Agency 2020b, ‘IEA Natural Gas Grose, MR, Narsey, S, Delage, FP, Dowdy, AJ, Bador, M, Information Statistics’, accessed from . Lyu, K, Rashid, H, Zhang, X, Wales, S, Trenham, C, Holbrook, International Energy Agency 2020c, Gas 2020, accessed NJ, Cowan, T, Alexander, L, Arblaster, JM & Power, S 2020, June 16, 2020, from . Future, vol. 8, no. 5, p. e2019EF001469. International Energy Agency 2020d, World Energy Gütschow, J, Jeffery, L, Geiseke, R & Günther A 2019, The Balances Data Service, accessed from . pik.2019.018>. REFERENCES 46

IPCC 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Milne, P 2020, ‘Chevron’s dodge on Gorgon LNG carbon Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth pollution rejected’, Boiling Cold, accessed September 3, Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on 2020, from . United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, accessed from Myhre, G, Shindell, D, Bréon, F-M, Collins, W, Fuglestvedt, . J, Huang, J, Koch, D, Lamarque, J-F, Lee, D, Mendoza, Johnston, FH, Borchers-Arriagada, N, Morgan, GG, B, Nakajima, T, Robock, A, Stephens, G, Takemura, T & Jalaludin, B, Palmer, AJ, Williamson, GJ & Bowman, Zhang, H 2013, ‘Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative DMJS 2020, ‘Unprecedented health costs of smoke-related Forcing’, in TF Stocker, D Qin, G-K Plattner, M Tignor, SK PM2.5 from the 2019–20 Australian megafires’, Nature Allen, J Boschung, A Nauels, Y Xia, V Bex, & PM Midgley , accessed November 26, 2020, from . Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Kilvert, N 2020, ‘Angus Taylor has been spruiking carbon Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom capture technology. Here’s what he’s not saying’, ABC and New York, NY, USA, pp. 659–740. News, accessed November 11, 2020, from . 2020, ‘Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases’, accessed from . Kirkpatrick, S 2016, ‘Great Barrier Reef bleaching would be almost impossible without climate change’, accessed NSW Government 2020, Final Report of the NSW Bushfire from . Lowry, D, Michel, SE, Myhre, CL, Platt, SM, Allen, G, Lafleur, D, Forcey, T, Saddler, H & Sandiford, M 2016, Bousquet, P, Brownlow, R, Cain, M, France, JL, Hermansen, A Review of Current and Future Methane Emissions O, Hossaini, R, Jones, AE, Levin, I, Manning, AC, Myhre, from Australian unconventional oil and gas production, G, Pyle, JA, Vaughn, BH, Warwick, NJ & White, JWC 2019, Melbourne Energy Institute, accessed from . Biogeochemical Cycles, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 318–342. Llewellyn-Smith, D 2020, ‘Scotty from Marketing Office of the Chief Economist 2020, Resources and Energy incoherent on gas’, MacroBusiness, accessed May 4, 2020, Quarterly - March 2020, Commonwealth of Australia, from . publications/resourcesandenergyquarterlymarch2020/ index.html>. Lord, M 2018, Zero Carbon Industry Plan: Electrifying Industry, Beyond Zero Emissions, accessed from . 2019, from . Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Pörtner, H-O, Roberts, Padilla, J 2020, ‘Dysfunctional oil market needs a new D, Skea, J, Shukla, PR, Pirani, A, Moufouma-Okia, W, model’, Financial Times, accessed May 4, 2020, from Péan, C, Pidcock, R, Connors, S, Matthews, JBR, Chen, . M, Waterfield, T, Pirani, A, Moufouma-Okia, W, Péan, C, Peduzzi, P & Harding Rohr Reis, R 2013, ‘Gas fracking: Can Pidcock, R, Connors, S, Matthews, JBR, Chen, Y, Zhou, X, we safely squeeze the rocks?’, Environmental Development, Gomis, MI, Lonnoy, E, Maycock, T, Tignor, M & Waterfield, vol. 6, p. 86. T (eds) 2018, Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above Plante, L, Browning, J, Aitken, G, Inman, M & Nace, T 2020, pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas Gas Bubble 2020: Tracking Global LNG Infrastructure, emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the Global Energy Monitor, accessed from . Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, accessed from . Project Energy Connect 2020a, ‘Increased bill reductions to flow from SA-NSW electricity interconnector’, McCarron, G 2018, ‘Air Pollution and human health accessed October 29, 2020, from . gas industry in Queensland’s Darling Downs’, International Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 171–185. Project Energy Connect 2020b, ‘NSW electricity customers to save $180 million per year from SA-NSW interconnector’, McConnell, D & Sandiford, M 2020, ‘Impacts of LNG accessed October 29, 2020, from . dynamics, 2016-2019’, Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports. 47 PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE

Reisinger, A & Kitching, RL 2014, ‘Australasia’, in CB Field & Smith, CJ, Kramer, RJ, Myhre, G, Forster, PM, Soden, VR Barros (eds), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, BJ, Andrews, T, Boucher, O, Faluvegi, G, Fläschner, D, and Vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the Hodnebrog, Ø, Kasoar, M, Kharin, V, Kirkevåg, A, Lamarque, fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on J-F, Mülmenstädt, J, Olivié, D, Richardson, T, Samset, BH, Climate Change, Cambridge, New York, NY. Shindell, D, Stier, P, Takemura, T, Voulgarakis, A & Watson- Parris, D 2018, ‘Understanding Rapid Adjustments to RenewEconomy 2019, ‘South Australia’s stunning Diverse Forcing Agents’, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. renewable energy transition, and what comes next’, 45, no. 21, p. 12,023-12,031. RenewEconomy, accessed October 29, 2020, from . SE, Crucifix, M, Donges, JF, Fetzer, I, Lade, SJ, Scheffer, M, Winkelmann, R & Schellnhuber, HJ 2018, ‘Trajectories Robiou du Pont, Y, Jeffery, ML, Gütschow, J, Rogelj, J, of the Earth System in the ’, Proceedings Christoff, P & Meinshausen, M 2016, ‘Equitable mitigation to of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 33, pp. achieve the Paris Agreement goals’, Nature Climate Change, 8252–8259. vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 38–43. Sterner, EO & Johansson, DJA 2017, ‘The effect of Rogelj, J, Shindell, D, Jiang, K, Fifita, S, Forster, P, Ginzburg, climate–carbon cycle feedbacks on emission metrics’, V, Handa, C, Kheshgi, H, Kobayashi, S, Kriegler, E, Mundaca, Environmental Research Letters, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 034019. L, Séférian, R & Vilariño, MV 2018, ‘Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Stockholm Environment Institute, International Institute Development’, in V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, H-O Pörtner, for , Overseas Development D Roberts, J Skea, PR Shukla, A Pirani, W Moufouma- Institute, Climate Analytics, CICERO Centre for Okia, C Péan, R Pidcock, S Connors, JBR Matthews, Y International Climate Research & United Nations Chen, X Zhou, MI Gomis, E Lonnoy, T Maycock, M Tignor, Environment Programme 2019, The Production Gap 2019, & T Waterfield (eds), Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC accessed from . Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C Tong, D, Zhang, Q, Zheng, Y, Caldeira, K, Shearer, C, Hong, above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse C, Qin, Y & Davis, SJ 2019, ‘Committed emissions from gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate the global response to the threat of climate change, target’, Nature, p. 1. sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Ukkola, AM, Kauwe, MGD, Roderick, ML, Abramowitz, G & accessed from . Pitman, AJ 2020, ‘Robust Future Changes in Meteorological Drought in CMIP6 Projections Despite Uncertainty in Saunois, M, Stavert, AR, Poulter, B, Bousquet, P, Canadell, Precipitation’, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 47, no. 11, JG, Jackson, RB, Raymond, PA, Dlugokencky, EJ, p. e2020GL087820. Houweling, S, Patra, PK, Ciais, P, Arora, VK, Bastviken, D, Bergamaschi, P, Blake, DR, Brailsford, G, Bruhwiler, L, UNFCCC 2015, Paris Agreement to the United Nations Carlson, KM, Carrol, M, Castaldi, S, Chandra, N, Crevoisier, Framework Convention on Climate Change,. C, Crill, PM, Covey, K, Curry, CL, Etiope, G, Frankenberg, C, Gedney, N, Hegglin, MI, Höglund-Isaksson, L, Hugelius, United Nations Treaty Collection 2020, ‘Paris Agreement’, G, Ishizawa, M, Ito, A, Janssens-Maenhout, G, Jensen, United Nations, accessed from . KC, McNorton, J, Miller, PA, Melton, JR, Morino, I, Müller, J, Ward, M, Tulloch, AIT, Radford, JQ, Williams, BA, Reside, Murguia-Flores, F, Naik, V, Niwa, Y, Noce, S, O’Doherty, S, AE, Macdonald, SL, Mayfield, HJ, Maron, M, Possingham, Parker, RJ, Peng, C, Peng, S, Peters, GP, Prigent, C, Prinn, R, HP, Vine, SJ, O’Connor, JL, Massingham, EJ, Greenville, AC, Ramonet, M, Regnier, P, Riley, WJ, Rosentreter, JA, Segers, Woinarski, JCZ, Garnett, ST, Lintermans, M, Scheele, BC, A, Simpson, IJ, Shi, H, Smith, SJ, Steele, LP, Thornton, Carwardine, J, Nimmo, DG, Lindenmayer, DB, Kooyman, BF, Tian, H, Tohjima, Y, Tubiello, FN, Tsuruta, A, Viovy, N, RM, Simmonds, JS, Sonter, LJ & Watson, JEM 2020, ‘Impact Voulgarakis, A, Weber, TS, Weele, M van, Werf, GR van der, of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat’, Weiss, RF, Worthy, D, Wunch, D, Yin, Y, Yoshida, Y, Zhang, Nature Ecology & Evolution, pp. 1–6. W, Zhang, Z, Zhao, Y, Zheng, B, Zhu, Qing, Zhu, Qiuan & Zhuang, Q 2020, ‘The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017’, Wintle, BA, Legge, S & Woinarski, JCZ 2020, ‘After the Earth System Science Data, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1561–1623. Megafires: What Next for Australian Wildlife?’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, accessed from . understanding of bushfires as “carbon neutral” events’, ECOS (CSIRO), accessed September 13, 2020, from . . Skinner, B 2020, ‘Barker Inlet: A new technology responding to the market’, Australian Energy Council, WWF Australia 2020, Australia’s 2019-2020 Bushfires: The accessed September 13, 2020, from . bushfire-crisis#gs.bc6hkx>. IMAGE CREDITS 48

Image credits

Cover image: Climate Council. Jeeralang A Power Station in Victoria.

Page 4: Figure 1 - Bureau of Meteorolgy. 24 moth rainfall deficiency, period ending 31 January 2020. CC-BY. Page 6: Figure 2 - Kate Ausburn. Gas flare for nearby coal seam gas operations, New South Wales. Rights reserved. Used with permission. Page 8: Figure 3 - Max Phillips. Aerial view of gas well, New South Wales. Rights reserved. Used with permission. Page 9: Figure 4 - Shutterstock user EA Given. LNG tanker in the Timor Sea outside Darwin. Rights reserved. Licensed use. Page 10: Figure 5 - Climate Council. Proportion of gas consumed in Australia by sector (2018-19 financial year). Page 11: Figure 6 - Lock the Gate Alliance. Decommissioned coal seam gas well, New South Wales. CC-BY. Page 18: Figure 7 - Climate Council. Atmospheric methane concentrations (1984 - 2020). Page 20: Figure 8 - Shutterstock user Ecopix. Western Downs coal seam gas field in Queensland. Rights reserved. Licensed use. Page 21: Figure 9 - Max Phillips. Onshore gas rig, New South Wales. Rights reserved. Used with permission. Page 27: Figure 10 - Climate Council. Jeeralang B Power Station in Victoria. Page 32: Figure 11 - Climate Council. Australian electricity generation by source, financial years. Page 34: Figure 12 - Climate Council. Installed capacity by generation type under the Integrated System Plan’s most ambitious scenario. Page 36: Figure 13. Geoff Whalan. LNG Tanker departing Darwin for Japan. CC BY ND. Page 38: Figure 14. Climate Council. Breakeven point of Eastern Australian gas export facilities compared with international competitors. Page 41: Figure 15. Shutterstock user BrosFilm. Flare above Ichthys Explorer Central Processing Facility in Northern Territory. Rights reserved. Licensed use. Thank you for supporting the Climate Council.

The Climate Council is an independent, crowd-funded organisation providing quality information on climate change to the Australian public.

CLIMATE COUNCIL

facebook.com/climatecouncil

twitter.com/climatecouncil

[email protected]

climatecouncil.org.au

The Climate Council is a not-for-profit organisation. We rely upon donations from the public. We really appreciate your contributions.

DONATE climatecouncil.org.au/donate