Cartilage Tympanoplasty John Dornhoffer & Edward Gardner

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cartilage Tympanoplasty John Dornhoffer & Edward Gardner Chapter 6 Cartilage Tympanoplasty John Dornhoffer & Edward Gardner Generally speaking, there are two distinct techni- the use of less compliant, more rigid grafting ques utilized for cartilage reconstruction of the materials for TM reconstruction, such as the cartilage tympanic membrane (TM): the perichondrium/car- graft. Although one might anticipate a significant tilage island flap, which uses tragal cartilage, and the conductive hearing loss with cartilage, due to its palisade technique, which uses cartilage from the rigidity, it is this quality that tends to resist resorp- tragus or cymba, depending on the surgical ap- tion and retraction, even in the milieu of continuous proach. Either technique can be used to reconstruct eustachian tube dysfunction. It has been shown in the TM; however, the choice of technique is typically both experimental and clinical studies that cartilage dictated by the specific middle ear pathology or, in is well-tolerated by the middle ear, and long-term cases where the TM reconstruction is in conjunction survival is the norm.15 Á 18 It appears that cartilage with ossiculoplasty, the status of the ossicular chain. grafts are nourished largely by diffusion and become The palisade technique is preferred in cases of well incorporated in the TM.19 Human and animal cholesteatoma and when ossicular reconstruction is studies20,21 have shown that although some soft- needed in the malleus-present situation. The peri- ening occurs with time, the matrix of the cartilage chondrium/cartilage island flap is preferred for remains intact, but with empty lacunae, demonstrat- management of the atelectatic ear and the high-risk ing degeneration of the chondrocytes. perforation. This chapter describes the two techni- The use of cartilage in middle ear surgery is not a ques in detail, followed by descriptions of the new concept, but the last decade has shown a modifications that should be taken in response to renewed interest in this material as an alternative specific surgical indications. to more traditional grafting materials for TM recon- Tympanoplasty, or repair of the TM, was first struction. Cartilage has been recommended on a introduced by Zoellner1 and Wullstein2 in 1952. limited basis to manage retraction pockets by ad- Since that time, numerous graft materials and vocates such as Sheehy,22 Glasscock and Hart,23 methods of placement have been described to Levinson19,Eviatar,24 and Adkins,25 all of whom reconstruct the TM. Skin, fascia, vein, and dura have reported excellent anatomic results. Cartilage mater have all been described as grafting materials also has been described for use in cases of recurrent for the TM.3 Á9 Temporalis fascia and perichondrium perforation and revision tympanoplasty with en- remain the most commonly employed materials for couraging results.14,26,27 closure of TM perforations, and successful recon- Given the good anatomic results, more attention struction is anticipated in approximately 90% of also has been given to the acoustic properties of primary tympanoplasties.10 cartilage compared with more traditional grafting In certain situations such as the atelectatic ear, materials. In a retrospective comparison between cholesteatoma, and revision tympanoplasty, how- perichondrium and cartilage in type I tympanoplas- ever, the results have not been as gratifying. In these ties, we reported no significant difference in hearing situations fascia and perichondrium have been between groups.28 Graft take was 100% in the shown to undergo atrophy and subsequent failure cartilage group and 85% in the perichondrium in the postoperative period, regardless of placement group. These results were supported by other technique.11 The recurrent perforation and dischar- researchers who have shown excellent closure of ging ear are likewise associated with less than the air/bone gap with cartilage tympanoplasty optimal results.12 Á 14 These observations have led to techniques.14,26,27,29 1 2 . MIDDLE EAR AND MASTOID SURGERY TECHNIQUES FOR RECONSTRUCTION measuring 15 x 10 mm in children and somewhat larger in adults. The perichondrium from the side of the cartilage furthest from the ear canal is dissected off, leaving HARvEST OF THE CARTILAGE GRAFT the thinner perichondrium on the reverse side. A Cartilage for TM reconstruction is typically har- perichondrium/cartilage island flap is constructed 28 vested from two areas, the tragus and the cymba, as described previously. Using a round knife, depending on the type of reconstruction to be cartilage is removed to produce an eccentrically performed. The perichondrium/cartilage island located disk of cartilage about 7 to 9 mm in diameter flap is nearly always constructed with cartilage for total TM reconstruction. A flap of perichondrium harvested from the tragus. This cartilage is ideal is produced posteriorly that will eventually drape because it is thin, flat, and in sufficient quantities to over the posterior canal wall. A complete strip of permit reconstruction of the entire TM. The cartilage cartilage 2 mm in width is then removed vertically is used as a full-thickness graft and is typically from the center of the cartilage to accommodate the slightly less than 1 mm thick in most cases. Although entire malleus handle (Fig. 6Á/2). The creation of two Zahnert et al30 suggested a slight acoustical benefit cartilage islands in this manner is essential to enable could be obtained by thinning the cartilage to 0.5 the reconstructed TM to bend and conform to the mm, this advantage is offset by the unacceptable normal conical shape of the TM. When the ossicular curling of the graft that occurs when the cartilage is chain is intact, an additional triangular piece of cartilage is removed from the posterior-superior thinned and perichondrium is left attached to one quadrant to accommodate the incus. This excision side. prevents the lateral displacement of the posterior When the palisade technique is used for recon- portion of the cartilage graft that sometimes occurs struction of the TM, cartilage can be harvested from because of insufficient space between the malleus either the tragus or the cymba. Cartilage from the and incus. cymba area of the conchal bowl is used if the The entire graft is placed in an underlay fashion, surgical approach involves a postauricular incision. with the malleus fitting in the groove and actually Tragal cartilage is used if the approach is transcanal pressing down into and conforming to the perichon- or endaural. The cartilage of the cymba is similar to drium, as shown in Figure 6Á/3. The cartilage is the tragus in that it has an acceptable thickness of placed toward the promontory, with the perichon- about 1 mm compared to other areas of the concha, drium immediately adjacent to the TM remnant, which are thicker and irregular. It is different, both of which are medial to the malleus. Failure to v v howe er, in that it is cur ed, making it difficult to remove enough cartilage from the center strip will create a perichondrium/cartilage island flap suitable cause the graft to fold up at the center instead of for reconstruction of the entire TM. lying flat in the desired position. Likewise, if the strip is insufficient, the cartilage may be displaced medially instead of assuming a more lateral position PERICHONDRIUM/CARTILAGE ISLAND FLAP in the same plane as the malleus. Gelfoam (Upjohn Laboratories, Kalamazoo, MI) is The general technique of reconstruction using the packed in the middle ear space underneath the perichondrium/cartilage island flap begins with anterior annulus to support the graft in this area, harvest of the cartilage from the tragal area.28 An and the posterior flap of perichondrium is draped initial cut through skin and cartilage is made on the over the posterior canal wall. Middle ear packing is v medial side of the tragus, lea ing a 2-mm strip of avoided on the promontory and in the vicinity of the cartilage in the dome of the tragus for cosmesis (Fig. ossicular chain. One piece of Gelfoam is placed 6Á/1). The cartilage, with attached perichondrium, is lateral to the reconstructed TM, and antibiotic dissected medially from the overlying skin and soft ointment is placed in the ear canal (Fig. 6Á/4). tissue by spreading a pair of sharp scissors in a plane that is easily developed superficial to the perichon- drium on both sides. At this point, it is necessary to THE PALISADE TECHNIQUE make an inferior cut as low as possible to maximize In the palisade technique, the cartilage is cut into the length of harvested cartilage. The cartilage is several slices that are subsequently pieced together, then grasped and retracted inferiorly, which delivers like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, to reconstruct the the superior portion from the incisura area. The TM (Fig. 6Á/5). Because of the nature of the recon- superior portion is then dissected out while retract- struction, it is not necessary to have one large, flat ing, which produces a piece of cartilage typically piece of cartilage, and the more curved cymba CHAPTER 6CARTILAGE TYMPANOPLASTY . 3 Figure 6 /1 Harvest of cartilage, leaving small rim of cartilage in dome for cosmesisÁ (right ear). Figure 6 /2 Prepared perichondrium/cartilage island graft, showingÁ strip of cartilage removed to facilitate malleus. Figure 6 /3 Lateral line drawing demonstrating proper placementÁ of graft. 4 . MIDDLE EAR AND MASTOID SURGERY Figure 6 /4 Postoperative ear with peri- chondrium/cartilageÁ island graft (left ear). Figure 6 /5 Schematic of palisade techniqueÁ (right ear). Figure 6 /6 Schematic illustrating location ofÁ cymba cartilage (left ear). Figure 6 /7 Harvesting of cymba cartilage with postauricularÁ incision (right ear). Figure 6 /8 Series demonstrating sequence of palisade reconstructionÁ (left ear). (A) Total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) in place. (B) Initial cartilage placement. (C) Reconstruction of the scutum. (D) Reconstruction of remainder of posterior tympanic membrane.
Recommended publications
  • A Post-Tympanoplasty Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Development of Myringosclerosis in the Graft: a Clinical Study
    Int Adv Otol 2014; 10(2): 102-6 • DOI: 10.5152/iao.2014.40 Original Article A Post-Tympanoplasty Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Development of Myringosclerosis in the Graft: A Clinical Study Can Özbay, Rıza Dündar, Erkan Kulduk, Kemal Fatih Soy, Mehmet Aslan, Hüseyin Katılmış Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Şifa University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey (CÖ) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mardin State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey (RD, EK, KFS, MA) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey (HK) OBJECTIVE: Myringosclerosis (MS) is a pathological condition characterized by hyaline degeneration and calcification of the collagenous structure of the fibrotic layer of the tympanic membrane, which may develop after trauma, infection, or inflammation as myringotomy, insertion of a ventila- tion tube, or myringoplasty. The aim of our study was to both reveal and evaluate the impact of the factors that might be effective on the post-tym- panoplasty development of myringosclerosis in the graft. MATERIALS and METHODS: In line with this objective, a total of 108 patients (44 males and 64 females) aged between 11 and 66 years (mean age, 29.5 years) who had undergone type 1 tympanoplasty (TP) with an intact canal wall technique and type 2 TP, followed up for an average of 38.8 months, were evaluated. In the presence of myringosclerosis, in consideration of the tympanic membrane (TM) quadrants involved, the influential factors were analyzed in our study, together with the development of myringosclerosis, including preoperative factors, such as the presence of myringosclerosis in the residual and also contralateral tympanic membrane, extent and location of the perforation, and perioperative factors, such as tympanosclerosis in the middle ear and mastoid cavity, cholesteatoma, granulation tissue, and type of the operation performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Three-Dimensional Angular Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Following Intratympanic Gentamicin for Menieres Disease
    JARO 03: 430±443 82002) DOI: 10.1007/s101620010053 JARO Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Changes in the Three-Dimensional Angular Vestibulo-Ocular Re¯ex following Intratympanic Gentamicin for MeÂnieÁre's Disease 1 1±3 4,5 1 JOHN P. CAREY, LLOYD B. MINOR, GRACE C.Y. PENG, CHARLES C. DELLA SANTINA, 6 7 PHILLIP D. CREMER, AND THOMAS HASLWANTER 1 1Department of Otolaryngology±Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA 3Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA 4Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA 1 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA 6Eye and Ear Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia 7Department of Neurology, ZuÈrich University Hospital, ZuÈrich, Switzerland Received: 19 June 2000; Accepted: 21 January 2002; Online publication: 26 March 2002 ABSTRACT these gain values and those for head thrusts that ex- cited the contralateral canals were <2%. In contrast, The 3-dimensional angular vestibulo-ocular re¯exes caloric asymmetries averaged 40% 32%. Intra- 8AVOR) elicited by rapid rotary head thrusts were tympanic gentamicin resulted in decreased gains studied in 17 subjects with unilateral MeÂnieÁre's attributable to each canal on the treated side: disease before and 2±10 weeks after treatment with 0.40 0.12 8HC), 0.35 0.14 8AC), 0.31 0.14 8PC) intratympanic gentamicin and in 13 subjects after 8p < 0.01). However, the gains attributable to con- surgical unilateral vestibular destruction 8SUVD).
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Loss Due to Myringotomy and Tube Placement and the Role of Preoperative Audiograms
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hearing Loss Due to Myringotomy and Tube Placement and the Role of Preoperative Audiograms Mark Emery, MD; Peter C. Weber, MD Background: Postoperative complications of myrin- erative and postoperative sensorineural and conductive gotomy and tube placement often include otorrhea, tym- hearing loss. panosclerosis, and tympanic membrane perforation. How- ever, the incidence of sensorineural or conductive hearing Results: No patient developed a postoperative sensori- loss has not been documented. Recent efforts to curb the neural or conductive hearing loss. All patients resolved use of preoperative audiometric testing requires docu- their conductive hearing loss after myringotomy and tube mentation of this incidence. placement. There was a 1.3% incidence of preexisting sen- sorineural hearing loss. Objective: To define the incidence of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss associated with myrin- Conclusions: The incidence of sensorineural or con- gotomy and tube placement. ductive hearing loss after myringotomy and tube place- ment is negligible and the use of preoperative audiomet- Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart re- ric evaluation may be unnecessary in selected patients, view of 550 patients undergoing myringotomy and tube but further studies need to be done to corroborate this placement was performed. A total of 520 patients under- small data set. going 602 procedures (1204 ears), including myrin- gotomy and tube placement, were assessed for preop- Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:421-424 TITIS MEDIA (OM) is one erative hearing status and whether it has of the most frequent dis- either improved or remained stable after eases of childhood, af- MTT. A recent report by Manning et al11 fecting at least 80% of demonstrated a 1% incidence of preop- children prior to school erative sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) Oentry.1-4 Because of the high incidence of in children undergoing MTT.
    [Show full text]
  • Myringotomy and Ear Tubes WHAT IS THE
    Myringotomy and Ear Tubes Myringotomy and Ear Tubes What to expect after surgery when ear tubes are placed: WHAT IS THE OPERATION? 1. DIET: There may be nausea or vomiting for a few hours after the operation. Start by drinking liquids and advance to a A very small slit is made in the eardrum for the purpose of draining regular diet as tolerated. fluid out from behind the eardrum and allowing air to get in behind the eardrum. After the slit is made a very tiny plastic or silicone rubber 2. PAIN: Generally, there is little pain, but Tylenol or Tempra may tube is inserted in the eardrum to keep the small hole open. be taken if needed every six hours. If pain medication is needed beyond 2 days, contact the doctor. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE VENTILATION TUBE? 3. EAR DRAINAGE AFTER THE PROCEDURE: A little bloody Fluid in the ear causes hearing loss, promotes infection, and causes discharge for a few days is expected. Occasionally, there will discomfort. The function of the ventilation tube is to allow air to flow be a lot of mucus drainage from one or both of the ears, for between the outer ear and the middle ear, which equalizes air pressure perhaps a week. It is not unusual if there is no drainage. in the ear. It takes over the function of the patient’s own eustachian tube, which is not functioning properly. The tube will also allow 4. EAR DRAINAGE AFTER THE FIRST WEEK OR TWO: Usually there infection, if it recurs, to drain out of the ear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation of Dizzinessin Elderly Patients
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.68.801.558 on 1 July 1992. Downloaded from Postgrad Med J (1992) 68, 558 561 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1992 The evaluation ofdizziness in elderly patients N. Ahmad, J.A. Wilson', R.M. Barr-Hamilton2, D.M. Kean3 and W.J. MacLennan Geriatric Medicine Unit, City Hospital, Edinburgh and Departments of'Otolaryngology, 2Audiology and 3Radiology, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK Summary: Twenty-one elderly patients with dizziness underwent a comprehensive medical and otoneurological evaluation. The majority had vertigo, limited mobility and restricted neck movements. Poor visual acuity, postural hypotension and presbyacusis were also frequent findings. Electronystagmo- graphy revealed positional nystagmus in 12, disordered smooth pursuit in 18, and abnormal caloric responses in nine. Magnetic resonance imaging showed ischaemic changes in six out of eight patients. Although dizziness in the elderly is clearly multifactorial, the suggested importance of vertebrobasilar ischaemia warrants further consideration as vertigo has been shown to be a risk factor for stroke. Introduction More than one third of individuals over the age of Patients and methods 65 years experience recurrent attacks of dizziness.' Serious consequences include a high incidence of The subjects were 21 patients who had been falls in patients with non-rotating dizziness, and an referred to either the care ofthe elderly unit or ENTcopyright. increased risk of stroke in those with vertigo (a Department in Edinburgh for the investigation of sensation ofmovement relative to surroundings)." 2 dizziness. There were five males and 16 females The causes ofdizziness are legion.3 Its diagnosis, aged 68-95 years (median = 81 years).
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Diagnoses and Procedures Billed Among Recent Graduates Practicing General Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surger
    Eskander et al. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (2018) 47:47 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0293-8 ORIGINALRESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada Antoine Eskander1,2,3* , Paolo Campisi4, Ian J. Witterick5 and David D. Pothier6 Abstract Background: An analysis of the scope of practice of recent Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) graduates working as general otolaryngologists has not been previously performed. As Canadian OHNS residency programs implement competency-based training strategies, this data may be used to align residency curricula with the clinical and surgical practice of recent graduates. Methods: Ontario billing data were used to identify the most common diagnostic and procedure codes used by general otolaryngologists issued a billing number between 2006 and 2012. The codes were categorized by OHNS subspecialty. Practitioners with a narrow range of procedure codes or a high rate of complex procedure codes, were deemed subspecialists and therefore excluded. Results: There were 108 recent graduates in a general practice identified. The most common diagnostic codes assigned to consultation billings were categorized as ‘otology’ (42%), ‘general otolaryngology’ (35%), ‘rhinology’ (17%) and ‘head and neck’ (4%). The most common procedure codes were categorized as ‘general otolaryngology’ (45%), ‘otology’ (23%), ‘head and neck’ (13%) and ‘rhinology’ (9%). The top 5 procedures were nasolaryngoscopy, ear microdebridement, myringotomy with insertion of ventilation tube, tonsillectomy, and turbinate reduction. Although otology encompassed a large proportion of procedures billed, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy were surprisingly uncommon. Conclusion: This is the first study to analyze the nature of the clinical and surgical cases managed by recent OHNS graduates.
    [Show full text]
  • Tympanostomy Tubes in Children Final Evidence Report: Appendices
    Health Technology Assessment Tympanostomy Tubes in Children Final Evidence Report: Appendices October 16, 2015 Health Technology Assessment Program (HTA) Washington State Health Care Authority PO Box 42712 Olympia, WA 98504-2712 (360) 725-5126 www.hca.wa.gov/hta/ [email protected] Tympanostomy Tubes Provided by: Spectrum Research, Inc. Final Report APPENDICES October 16, 2015 WA – Health Technology Assessment October 16, 2015 Table of Contents Appendices Appendix A. Algorithm for Article Selection ................................................................................................. 1 Appendix B. Search Strategies ...................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix C. Excluded Articles ....................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix D. Class of Evidence, Strength of Evidence, and QHES Determination ........................................ 9 Appendix E. Study quality: CoE and QHES evaluation ................................................................................ 13 Appendix F. Study characteristics ............................................................................................................... 20 Appendix G. Results Tables for Key Question 1 (Efficacy and Effectiveness) ............................................. 39 Appendix H. Results Tables for Key Question 2 (Safety) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ear, Nose and Throat Superbill Template Date of Service: Insurance: Patient Name
    Ear, Nose and Throat Superbill Template Date of service: Insurance: Patient name: Subscriber name: Address: Group #: Previous balance: Copay: Today’s charges: Phone: Account #: Today’s payment: check# DOB: Age: Sex: Physician name: Balance due: MOD. Patient E/M New Est MOD. I&D, intraoral, tongue, floor of 41005 MOD. Flexible laryngoscopy with 31578 mouth, sublingual, superficial removal of lesion Level I 99201 99211 I&D, intraoral, tongue, floor of 41005 Flexible laryngoscopy with 31579 mouth, sublingual, superficial stroboscopy Level II 99202 99212 I&D, extraoral, floor of mouth, 41015 Incision of labial frenulum 40806 sublingual Level III 99203 99213 I&D, extraoral, floor of mouth, 41016 Excision lingual frenulum 41115 submental Level IV 99204 99214 I&D, extraoral, submandibular 41017 Uvulectomy 42140 Level V 99205 99215 I&D, peritonsillar 42700 Destruction of lesion, palate or 42160 uvula (thermal, cryo) Consultations I&D infected thyroglossal duct 60000 Palate Somnoplasty 42145- cyst 52 Consultation Level I 99241 I&D external ear, simple 69000 Turbinate Somnoplasty 30140- 52 Consultation Level II 99242 I&D external ear, complicated 69005 Cautery ablation, any method, 30801 superficial Consultation Level III 99243 I&D, external auditory canal 69020 Cautery ablation, intramural 30802 Consultation Level IV 99244 Ear Procedures Removal of foreign body, 30300 intranasal Consultation Level V 99245 Myringotomy 69420 Removal of foreign body, external 69200 auditory canal Biopsy Tympanostomy 69433 Vestibular Function Tests Biopsy (Skin) 11100
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Vestibular Labyrinth in Patients with Atypical and Intractable Benign Positional Vertigo
    Original Paper ORL 2001;63:165–177 Received: February 22, 2001 Accepted: February 22, 2001 High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Vestibular Labyrinth in Patients with Atypical and Intractable Benign Positional Vertigo Bruno Schratzenstaller a Carola Wagner-Manslau b Christoph Alexiou a Wolfgang Arnold a aDepartment of Otolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, and bInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum München-Dachau, Dachau, Germany Key Words sections through the ampullary region and the adjoining Benign paroxysmal vertigo W Atypical positional vertigo W utricle showed no abnormalities, there were significant High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging W structural changes in the semicircular canals, which are Three-dimensional reconstruction able to provide an explanation for the symptoms of a heavy cupula. Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel Abstract Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a most common cause of dizziness and usually a self-limited dis- Introduction ease, although a small percentage of patients suffer from a permanent form and do not respond to any treatment. Many patients consult their physician because of dizzi- This persistent form of BPPV is thought to have a differ- ness or poor balance. Benign paroxysmal positional ver- ent underlying pathophysiology than the generally ac- tigo (BPPV) is probably the most common cause of ver- cepted canalolithiasis theory. We investigated 5 patients tigo [1] and the most common peripheral vestibular disor- who did not respond to physical treatment, presented der [2, 3]. It is a positional vertigo of sudden onset, trig- with an atypical concomitant nystagmus or both with gered by rapid changes of head and body position and high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance with concomitant nystagmus of short duration.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHAEL T. TEIXIDO, MD Curriculum Vitae 1
    MICHAEL T. TEIXIDO, M.D. Curriculum Vitae 1 CURRICULUM VITAE (Revised 1/2017) Michael Thomas Teixido, M.D. Office Address ENT & Allergy of Delaware 1941 Limestone Road, Suite 210 Wilmington, Delaware 19808 Office Phone (302) 998-0300 Fax (302) 998-5111 Websites http://www.entad.org/doctor/dr-michael-teixido-md/ http://www.dbi.udel.edu/biographies/michael-teixido-2 https://www.youtube.com/user/DRMTCI Birth Date December 20, 1959 Birthplace Wilmington, Delaware Foreign Language Spanish Wife’s Name Ilianna Valentinovna Teixido Children Sophia, Misha EDUCATION Degree Dates GRADUATE Bowman Gray School of Medicine Winston-Salem, North Carolina M.D. 8/81 – 6/85 UNDERGRADUATE Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, North Carolina B.A. Biology 8/77 – 6/81 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING Clinical Vestibular Disease (Otology Fellowship rotation) Southern Illinois University medical Center, Horst Konrad, M.D., Preceptor October – December 1991 Temporal Bone Anatomy and Histopathology(Otology Fellowship rotation) University of Chicago Temporal Bone Laboratory Raul Hinojosa, Ph.D., Preceptor July – September 1991 Clinical Fellowship in Otology, Neurotology & Skull Base Surgery MICHAEL T. TEIXIDO, M.D. Curriculum Vitae 2 Northwestern University Medical Center Richard J. Wiet, M.D., Preceptor July 1990 – June 1991 Residency, Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Loyola University Medical Center Maywood, Illinois Gregory Matz, M.D., Director November 1986 – June 1990 Visiting Clinician in Otology, Neurotology & Skull Base Surgery House Ear Institute Los
    [Show full text]
  • Myringotomy Surgery with PE Tube Placement Perioperative Instructions
    Myringotomy Surgery with PE Tube Placement Perioperative Instructions Introduction What is the purpose of myringotomy surgery? This form is intended to inform you about myringotomy (meer-ing- Treats ear infections that have not responded well to other GOT-o-mee) surgery. During myringotomy surgery, a tube is placed treatments in the eardrum. Topics covered include basic function of the ear, what Improves hearing loss caused by fluid build up occurs during surgery and postop care. Improves speech development delayed by hearing loss How does the ear work? Treats recurrent Eustachian tube dysfunction Treats ear problems associated with cleft palate The outer ear collects sound. The paper-thin eardrum separates the outer ear from the middle ear, a tiny air-filled cavity. The middle ear Benefits of myringotomy surgery may include: contains the bones of hearing, which are attached to the eardrum. Fewer and less severe ear infections When sound waves strike the eardrum, it vibrates and sets the bones Hearing improvement in motion, enabling sound to be transmitted to the inner ear. The inner Improvement of speech ear converts vibrations to electrical signals and sends these signals to the brain. What are the risks of surgery? A healthy middle ear contains air, which enters through the narrow Difficulties related to anesthesia Eustachian tube that connects the back of the nose to the ear. A Failure for the incision to heal after the tube falls out normally functioning Eustachian tube opens to equalize pressure in (tympanic membrane perforation) the middle ear, allowing fluid to exist. Fluid build-up in the middle Scarring of the eardrum ear can block transmission of sound, causing hearing loss and/or Hearing loss setting the stage for recurrent ear infections (otitis media).
    [Show full text]
  • Petubes Patient Handout.Pdf
    Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology Information on Tympanostomy Tubes Tympanostomy tubes are small plastic or metal tubes that are placed into the tympanic membrane or ear drum. How long will the tube stay in place? Tubes usually fall out of the ear in 6 months- 2 years. If they remain in longer than 2 to 3 years they are sometimes removed. What is involved with Tympanostomy tube placement? This surgery is usually done under general anesthesia. The eardrum is examined using a microscope. A small hole is made in the ear drum called a myringotomy, fluid is removed, and the tube is placed. Tube in the eardrum What medical conditions are treated with tubes? Recurrent middle ear infections or frequent acute otitis media Otitis media with effusion or fluid in middle ear associated with hearing loss Eustachian tube dysfunction causing hearing loss or eardrum structure changes What is the Eustachian tube? This is the canal that links the middle ear with the throat. This tube allows air into the middle ear and drainage of fluid. This tube grows in width and length until children are about 5 years old. Reasons that the Eustachian tube may not work properly: Viral illness, exposure to allergens or tobacco smoke may lead to swelling of the eustachian tube resulting in fluid buildup in the middle ear. Children with cleft palate and craniofacial syndromes like Down’s syndrome may have poor eustachian tube function. How will Tympanostomy tube help my child? They allow air to re-enter middle ear space They reduce the number and severity of infections They improve hearing loss cause by middle ear fluid Why is adenoidectomy sometimes done with the Tympanostomy tubes? Adenoidectomy is the removal of the adenoid tissue behind the nose.
    [Show full text]