DOCSLIB.ORG

Tympanostomy Tubes in Children Final Evidence Report: Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tympanostomy Tubes in Children Final Evidence Report: Appendices Health Technology Assessment Tympanostomy Tubes in Children Final Evidence Report: Appendices October 16, 2015 Health Technology Assessment Program (HTA) Washington State Health Care Authority PO Box 42712 Olympia, WA 98504-2712 (360) 725-5126 www.hca.wa.gov/hta/ [email protected] Tympanostomy Tubes Provided by: Spectrum Research, Inc. Final Report APPENDICES October 16, 2015 WA – Health Technology Assessment October 16, 2015 Table of Contents Appendices Appendix A. Algorithm for Article Selection ................................................................................................. 1 Appendix B. Search Strategies ...................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix C. Excluded Articles ....................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix D. Class of Evidence, Strength of Evidence, and QHES Determination ........................................ 9 Appendix E. Study quality: CoE and QHES evaluation ................................................................................ 13 Appendix F. Study characteristics ............................................................................................................... 20 Appendix G. Results Tables for Key Question 1 (Efficacy and Effectiveness) ............................................. 39 Appendix H. Results Tables for Key Question 2 (Safety) ............................................................................. 97 Appendix I. Clinical Experts ..................................................................................................................... 117 References ................................................................................................................................................ 118 Tables Appendix Table G1. Hearing Levels by Child: TT vs. WW for OME ............................................................. 39 Appendix Table G2. Otorrhea: TT vs. WW for OME .................................................................................... 40 Appendix Table G3. AOM Episodes: TT vs. WW for OME ........................................................................... 40 Appendix Table G4. AOM Or OME Episodes: TT vs. WW for OME ............................................................. 41 Appendix Table G5. OME Episodes: TT vs. WW for OME ........................................................................... 41 Appendix Table G6. Attention And Behavioral Outcomes: TT vs. WW for OME ........................................ 42 Appendix Table G7. Academic Achievement: TT vs. WW for OME ............................................................ 44 Appendix Table G8. Auditory Processing: TT vs. WW for OME .................................................................. 45 Appendix Table G9. Reynell Or Schlichting Test (Speech And Language): TT vs. WW for OME ................. 47 Appendix Table G10. Other Speech And Language Outcome Measures: TT vs. WW for OME .................. 48 Appendix Table G11. Patient Quality Of Life: TT vs. WW for OME ............................................................. 49 Appendix Table G12. Patient And Parent Interaction: Quality Of Life: TT vs. WW for OME ...................... 50 Appendix Table G13. Pain: TT vs. WW for OME ......................................................................................... 53 Appendix Table G14. Surgery After Initial Treatment Protocol: TT vs. WW for OME ................................ 54 Appendix Table G15. Medication Usage: TT vs. WW for OME ................................................................... 55 Appendix Table G16. Hearing Levels by Ear: TT (One Ear) vs. No Treatment (Opposite Ear) for OME ...... 55 Appendix Table G17. OME Recurrence by Ear: TT (One Ear) vs. No Treatment (Opposite Ear) for OME .. 57 Appendix Table G18. Hearing Levels: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME .......................................................... 58 Appendix Table G19. Otorrhea: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME ................................................................... 59 Otorrhea (% (N/N)) ..................................................................................................................................... 59 Appendix Table G20. AOM Episodes: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME .......................................................... 59 Appendix Table G21. AOM Or OME Episodes: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME ............................................ 60 Tympanostomy Tubes in Children: Final Evidence Report - Appendices i WA – Health Technology Assessment October 16, 2015 Appendix Table G22. OME Episodes: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME .......................................................... 61 Appendix Table G23. Auditory Processing: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME ................................................. 62 Appendix Table G24. Pain: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME........................................................................... 63 Appendix Table G25. Surgery After Initial Treatment Protocol: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME ................. 64 Appendix Table G26. Medication Usage: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME .................................................... 65 Appendix Table G27. Office Visits: TT vs. Myringotomy for OME .............................................................. 65 Appendix Table G28. Hearing Levels: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME66 Appendix Table G29. Hearing Levels by Ear: TT (Unilateral) + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy (Contralateral) + Adenoidectomy for OME ........................................................................................ 67 Appendix Table G30. Otorrhea: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ........ 70 Appendix Table G31. Otorrhea by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Appendix Table G32. AOM: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .............. 71 Appendix Table G33. AOM by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ... 71 Appendix Table G34. AOM Or OME: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME 72 Appendix Table G35. OME Episodes: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME 72 Appendix Table G36. OME Episodes by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................................................... 73 Appendix Table G37. Cholesteatoma by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................................................... 73 Appendix Table G38. Auditory Processing by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................... 74 Appendix Table G39. Patient Quality Of Life: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................................................... 74 Appendix Table G40. Pain by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ..... 74 Appendix Table G41. Surgery After Initial Treatment Protocol: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................... 75 Appendix Table G42. Medication Usage: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix Table G43. Medication by Ear: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix Table G44. Office Visits: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ... 77 Appendix Table G45. Hearing Levels by Ear: TT (Unilateral) + Adenoidectomy vs. Adenoidectomy for OME .................................................................................................................................................... 78 Appendix Table G46. OME Recurrence by Ear: TT (Unilateral) + Adenoidectomy vs. Adenoidectomy (RCT Data) for OME .................................................................................................................................... 80 Appendix Table G47. OME Episodes: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Adenoidectomy (RCT Data) for OME ....... 80 Appendix Table G48. Cholesteatoma: TT + Adenoidectomy vs. Adenoidectomy (RCT Data) for OME ...... 81 Appendix Table G49. Hearing Levels by Patient: TT vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ........... 81 Appendix Table G50. Otorrhea: TT vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ..................................... 81 Appendix Table G51. AOM: TT vs. Myringotomy + Adenoidectomy for OME ............................................ 82 Tympanostomy Tubes in Children: Final Evidence Report - Appendices ii WA – Health Technology Assessment October 16, 2015 Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CASE REPORT Resolution of Delayed Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Stapedectomy
    The Mediterranean Journal of Otology CASE REPORT Resolution of Delayed Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Stapedectomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Noam Yehudai, MD, Michal Luntz, MD From the Department of Significant sensorineural hearing loss may develop immediately after suc- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck cessful stapedectomy but sometimes occurs months or even years later. Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical The rate of recovery from that disorder has not been determined. Several Center, Technion-Israel School of Technology, Haifa, Israel reports in the 1960s described patients with delayed sensorineural hear- ing loss, but that entity has not been mentioned in the English-language Correspondence literature for the last 30 years. We present a review of the literature on this Michal Luntz, MD postsurgical auditory complication and describe a patient with delayed Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery poststapedectomy sensorineural hearing loss that developed 15 months Bnai-Zion Medical Center, after surgery and resolved completely after treatment with an oral steroid. Technion-Israel School of Technology 47 Golomb St, PO Box 4940, Haifa 31048, Israel Phone: 972-4-8359544 Fax: 972-4-8361069 E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 05 February, 2006 Revised: 07 May, 2006 Accepted: 09 May, 2006 Mediterr J Otol 2006; 3: 156-160 Copyright 2005 © The Mediterranean Society of Otology and Audiology 156 Resolution of Delayed Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Stapedectomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    [Show full text]
  • A Post-Tympanoplasty Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Development of Myringosclerosis in the Graft: a Clinical Study
    Int Adv Otol 2014; 10(2): 102-6 • DOI: 10.5152/iao.2014.40 Original Article A Post-Tympanoplasty Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Development of Myringosclerosis in the Graft: A Clinical Study Can Özbay, Rıza Dündar, Erkan Kulduk, Kemal Fatih Soy, Mehmet Aslan, Hüseyin Katılmış Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Şifa University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey (CÖ) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mardin State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey (RD, EK, KFS, MA) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey (HK) OBJECTIVE: Myringosclerosis (MS) is a pathological condition characterized by hyaline degeneration and calcification of the collagenous structure of the fibrotic layer of the tympanic membrane, which may develop after trauma, infection, or inflammation as myringotomy, insertion of a ventila- tion tube, or myringoplasty. The aim of our study was to both reveal and evaluate the impact of the factors that might be effective on the post-tym- panoplasty development of myringosclerosis in the graft. MATERIALS and METHODS: In line with this objective, a total of 108 patients (44 males and 64 females) aged between 11 and 66 years (mean age, 29.5 years) who had undergone type 1 tympanoplasty (TP) with an intact canal wall technique and type 2 TP, followed up for an average of 38.8 months, were evaluated. In the presence of myringosclerosis, in consideration of the tympanic membrane (TM) quadrants involved, the influential factors were analyzed in our study, together with the development of myringosclerosis, including preoperative factors, such as the presence of myringosclerosis in the residual and also contralateral tympanic membrane, extent and location of the perforation, and perioperative factors, such as tympanosclerosis in the middle ear and mastoid cavity, cholesteatoma, granulation tissue, and type of the operation performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory Brainstem Response Latency in Noise As a Marker of Cochlear Synaptopathy
    The Journal of Neuroscience, March 30, 2016 • 36(13):3755–3764 • 3755 Systems/Circuits Auditory Brainstem Response Latency in Noise as a Marker of Cochlear Synaptopathy X Golbarg Mehraei,1,2 XAnn E. Hickox,1,4 X Hari M. Bharadwaj,2,7 Hannah Goldberg,1 Sarah Verhulst,2,6 M. Charles Liberman,1,4,5 and XBarbara G. Shinn-Cunningham2,3 1Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, 2Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, 4Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, 5Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, 6Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All and Medical Physics, Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Oldenburg University, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany, 7Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129 Evidence from animal and human studies suggests that moderate acoustic exposure, causing only transient threshold elevation, can nonetheless cause “hidden hearing loss” that interferes with coding of suprathreshold sound. Such noise exposure destroys synaptic connections between cochlear hair cells and auditory nerve fibers; however, there is no clinical test of this synaptopathy in humans. In animals, synaptopathy reduces the amplitude of auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-I. Unfortunately, ABR wave-I is difficult to measure in humans, limiting its clinical use. Here, using analogous measurements in humans and mice, we show that the effect of masking noise on the latency of the more robust ABR wave-V mirrors changes in ABR wave-I amplitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Three-Dimensional Angular Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Following Intratympanic Gentamicin for Menieres Disease
    JARO 03: 430±443 82002) DOI: 10.1007/s101620010053 JARO Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Changes in the Three-Dimensional Angular Vestibulo-Ocular Re¯ex following Intratympanic Gentamicin for MeÂnieÁre's Disease 1 1±3 4,5 1 JOHN P. CAREY, LLOYD B. MINOR, GRACE C.Y. PENG, CHARLES C. DELLA SANTINA, 6 7 PHILLIP D. CREMER, AND THOMAS HASLWANTER 1 1Department of Otolaryngology±Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA 3Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA 4Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA 1 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA 6Eye and Ear Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia 7Department of Neurology, ZuÈrich University Hospital, ZuÈrich, Switzerland Received: 19 June 2000; Accepted: 21 January 2002; Online publication: 26 March 2002 ABSTRACT these gain values and those for head thrusts that ex- cited the contralateral canals were <2%. In contrast, The 3-dimensional angular vestibulo-ocular re¯exes caloric asymmetries averaged 40% 32%. Intra- 8AVOR) elicited by rapid rotary head thrusts were tympanic gentamicin resulted in decreased gains studied in 17 subjects with unilateral MeÂnieÁre's attributable to each canal on the treated side: disease before and 2±10 weeks after treatment with 0.40 0.12 8HC), 0.35 0.14 8AC), 0.31 0.14 8PC) intratympanic gentamicin and in 13 subjects after 8p < 0.01). However, the gains attributable to con- surgical unilateral vestibular destruction 8SUVD).
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Loss Due to Myringotomy and Tube Placement and the Role of Preoperative Audiograms
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hearing Loss Due to Myringotomy and Tube Placement and the Role of Preoperative Audiograms Mark Emery, MD; Peter C. Weber, MD Background: Postoperative complications of myrin- erative and postoperative sensorineural and conductive gotomy and tube placement often include otorrhea, tym- hearing loss. panosclerosis, and tympanic membrane perforation. How- ever, the incidence of sensorineural or conductive hearing Results: No patient developed a postoperative sensori- loss has not been documented. Recent efforts to curb the neural or conductive hearing loss. All patients resolved use of preoperative audiometric testing requires docu- their conductive hearing loss after myringotomy and tube mentation of this incidence. placement. There was a 1.3% incidence of preexisting sen- sorineural hearing loss. Objective: To define the incidence of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss associated with myrin- Conclusions: The incidence of sensorineural or con- gotomy and tube placement. ductive hearing loss after myringotomy and tube place- ment is negligible and the use of preoperative audiomet- Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart re- ric evaluation may be unnecessary in selected patients, view of 550 patients undergoing myringotomy and tube but further studies need to be done to corroborate this placement was performed. A total of 520 patients under- small data set. going 602 procedures (1204 ears), including myrin- gotomy and tube placement, were assessed for preop- Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:421-424 TITIS MEDIA (OM) is one erative hearing status and whether it has of the most frequent dis- either improved or remained stable after eases of childhood, af- MTT. A recent report by Manning et al11 fecting at least 80% of demonstrated a 1% incidence of preop- children prior to school erative sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) Oentry.1-4 Because of the high incidence of in children undergoing MTT.
    [Show full text]
  • Myringotomy and Ear Tubes WHAT IS THE
    Myringotomy and Ear Tubes Myringotomy and Ear Tubes What to expect after surgery when ear tubes are placed: WHAT IS THE OPERATION? 1. DIET: There may be nausea or vomiting for a few hours after the operation. Start by drinking liquids and advance to a A very small slit is made in the eardrum for the purpose of draining regular diet as tolerated. fluid out from behind the eardrum and allowing air to get in behind the eardrum. After the slit is made a very tiny plastic or silicone rubber 2. PAIN: Generally, there is little pain, but Tylenol or Tempra may tube is inserted in the eardrum to keep the small hole open. be taken if needed every six hours. If pain medication is needed beyond 2 days, contact the doctor. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE VENTILATION TUBE? 3. EAR DRAINAGE AFTER THE PROCEDURE: A little bloody Fluid in the ear causes hearing loss, promotes infection, and causes discharge for a few days is expected. Occasionally, there will discomfort. The function of the ventilation tube is to allow air to flow be a lot of mucus drainage from one or both of the ears, for between the outer ear and the middle ear, which equalizes air pressure perhaps a week. It is not unusual if there is no drainage. in the ear. It takes over the function of the patient’s own eustachian tube, which is not functioning properly. The tube will also allow 4. EAR DRAINAGE AFTER THE FIRST WEEK OR TWO: Usually there infection, if it recurs, to drain out of the ear.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations Between Audiogram and Objective Hearing Tests in Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    International Tinnitus Journal, Vol. 5, No.2, 107-112 (1999) Correlations Between Audiogram and Objective Hearing Tests in Sensorineural Hearing Loss L. Bishara,1 J. Ben-David,l L. Podoshin,1 M. Fradis,l C.B. Teszler,l H. Pratt,2 T. Shpack,3 H. Feiglin,3 H. Hafner,3 and N. Herlinger2 I Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and 3Institute of Audiology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, and 2Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Technion, Haifa, Israel Abstract: Owing to its subjective nature, behavioral pure-tone audiometry often is an unre­ liable testing method in uncooperative subjects, and assessing the true hearing threshold be­ comes difficult. In such cases, objective tests are used for hearing-threshold determination (i.e., auditory brainstem evoked potentials [ABEP] and frequency-specific auditory evoked potentials: slow negative response at 10 msec [SN-1O]). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pure-tone audiogram shape and the predictive accuracy of SN-IO and ABEP in normal controls and in patients suf­ fering from sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). One-hundred-and-fifty subjects aged 15 to 70, some with normal hearing and the remainder with SNHL, were tested prospectively in a double-blind design. The battery of tests included pure-tone audiometry (air and bone conduction), speech reception threshold, ABEP, and SN- 10. Patients with SNHL were divided into four categories according to audiogram shape (i.e., flat, ascending, descending, and all other shapes). The results showed that ABEP predicts behavioral thresholds at 3 kHz and 4 kHz in cases of high-frequency hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation of Dizzinessin Elderly Patients
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.68.801.558 on 1 July 1992. Downloaded from Postgrad Med J (1992) 68, 558 561 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1992 The evaluation ofdizziness in elderly patients N. Ahmad, J.A. Wilson', R.M. Barr-Hamilton2, D.M. Kean3 and W.J. MacLennan Geriatric Medicine Unit, City Hospital, Edinburgh and Departments of'Otolaryngology, 2Audiology and 3Radiology, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK Summary: Twenty-one elderly patients with dizziness underwent a comprehensive medical and otoneurological evaluation. The majority had vertigo, limited mobility and restricted neck movements. Poor visual acuity, postural hypotension and presbyacusis were also frequent findings. Electronystagmo- graphy revealed positional nystagmus in 12, disordered smooth pursuit in 18, and abnormal caloric responses in nine. Magnetic resonance imaging showed ischaemic changes in six out of eight patients. Although dizziness in the elderly is clearly multifactorial, the suggested importance of vertebrobasilar ischaemia warrants further consideration as vertigo has been shown to be a risk factor for stroke. Introduction More than one third of individuals over the age of Patients and methods 65 years experience recurrent attacks of dizziness.' Serious consequences include a high incidence of The subjects were 21 patients who had been falls in patients with non-rotating dizziness, and an referred to either the care ofthe elderly unit or ENTcopyright. increased risk of stroke in those with vertigo (a Department in Edinburgh for the investigation of sensation ofmovement relative to surroundings)." 2 dizziness. There were five males and 16 females The causes ofdizziness are legion.3 Its diagnosis, aged 68-95 years (median = 81 years).
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Diagnoses and Procedures Billed Among Recent Graduates Practicing General Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surger
    Eskander et al. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (2018) 47:47 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0293-8 ORIGINALRESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Consultation diagnoses and procedures billed among recent graduates practicing general otolaryngology – head & neck surgery in Ontario, Canada Antoine Eskander1,2,3* , Paolo Campisi4, Ian J. Witterick5 and David D. Pothier6 Abstract Background: An analysis of the scope of practice of recent Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) graduates working as general otolaryngologists has not been previously performed. As Canadian OHNS residency programs implement competency-based training strategies, this data may be used to align residency curricula with the clinical and surgical practice of recent graduates. Methods: Ontario billing data were used to identify the most common diagnostic and procedure codes used by general otolaryngologists issued a billing number between 2006 and 2012. The codes were categorized by OHNS subspecialty. Practitioners with a narrow range of procedure codes or a high rate of complex procedure codes, were deemed subspecialists and therefore excluded. Results: There were 108 recent graduates in a general practice identified. The most common diagnostic codes assigned to consultation billings were categorized as ‘otology’ (42%), ‘general otolaryngology’ (35%), ‘rhinology’ (17%) and ‘head and neck’ (4%). The most common procedure codes were categorized as ‘general otolaryngology’ (45%), ‘otology’ (23%), ‘head and neck’ (13%) and ‘rhinology’ (9%). The top 5 procedures were nasolaryngoscopy, ear microdebridement, myringotomy with insertion of ventilation tube, tonsillectomy, and turbinate reduction. Although otology encompassed a large proportion of procedures billed, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy were surprisingly uncommon. Conclusion: This is the first study to analyze the nature of the clinical and surgical cases managed by recent OHNS graduates.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Review Otitis Media
    Clinical Review Otitis Media Jack Froom, MD Stony Brook, New York The spectrum of otitis media includes acute and chronic forms, each of which can be either suppurative of nonsuppurative. In the usual clinical setting distinctions between these several forms can be difficult. Determination of accurate incidence fig­ ures is impeded by the unavailability of universally accepted diagnostic criteria. Risk factors include season of the year, genetic factors, race, preceding respiratory tract infections, cleft palate, and others. The effect of household size and al­ lergy are uncertain. The most common infecting organisms are Streptococcus pneumoniae and Hemophilus influenzae, al­ though in a significant number of cases either the fluid is non- pathogenic or no organisms can be isolated. The effects of several therapies are reviewed, including antibiotics, myrin­ gotomy, steroids, and middle-ear ventilating tubes. Otitis media is one of the most frequent condi­ Incidence tions treated by family physicians and pediatricians. Otitis media ranks as the ninth most frequently Yet there are no standard criteria for diagnosis, made diagnosis for all ambulatory patient visits. In artd several issues regarding therapy are contro­ 1977 it accounted for approximately 11 million vis­ versial. The use of antihistamines, decongestants, its to physicians in the United States.1 For approx­ myringotomy, and even antibiotics are matters of imately one half of these visits the problem was contention, and the current roles of tympanometry new. Although these data give some indication of and tympanostomy tubes need clarification. The the ubiquitous nature of the problem, they do not purpose of this paper is to provide recommenda­ permit calculation of annual incidence by age and tions for diagnosis and management based on re­ sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Audiometric Test Procedures
    Audiometric Test Procedures 101 This information is meant to help you better understand the various test procedures as well as some of the terms you might see on an audiometric report. By Larry Medwetsky individual could, in fact, exhibit nor- In the previous issue of Hearing mal hearing acuity across these three Loss Magazine, I provided an over- Anyone who has ever had their frequencies, yet, exhibit a significant view concerning hearing threshold hearing tested should know how hearing loss in the higher frequencies results as recorded on the audiogram to read the audiogram, but that’s (3000-8000 Hz). Thus, it is important and an explanation of the pure-tone easier said than done. Hopefully, to examine the SRT in the context of audiogram. In this article, I will after reading this article you will the other audiometric test findings. describe various test procedures have a greater understanding of the Speech Awareness Threshold that are typically administered in principles discussed and use your (SAT): an audiometric evaluation and what knowledge going forward—be it in Compound words are pre- information the tests provide. reviewing hearing test results you sented, the goal being to determine already have or when discussing your the softest level one can detect the Audiometric Test Procedures results at your next hearing test. presence of words. This test is often Pure-tone Audiometry: Tones of used when an individual’s hearing loss different frequencies are presented; the is so great that the person is unable goal is to find the softest sound level relatively flat hearing losses, and the to recognize/repeat the words, yet is which one can hear (threshold) the average of 500 and 1000 Hz for those aware that words have been presented.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Vestibular Labyrinth in Patients with Atypical and Intractable Benign Positional Vertigo
    Original Paper ORL 2001;63:165–177 Received: February 22, 2001 Accepted: February 22, 2001 High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Vestibular Labyrinth in Patients with Atypical and Intractable Benign Positional Vertigo Bruno Schratzenstaller a Carola Wagner-Manslau b Christoph Alexiou a Wolfgang Arnold a aDepartment of Otolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, and bInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum München-Dachau, Dachau, Germany Key Words sections through the ampullary region and the adjoining Benign paroxysmal vertigo W Atypical positional vertigo W utricle showed no abnormalities, there were significant High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging W structural changes in the semicircular canals, which are Three-dimensional reconstruction able to provide an explanation for the symptoms of a heavy cupula. Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel Abstract Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a most common cause of dizziness and usually a self-limited dis- Introduction ease, although a small percentage of patients suffer from a permanent form and do not respond to any treatment. Many patients consult their physician because of dizzi- This persistent form of BPPV is thought to have a differ- ness or poor balance. Benign paroxysmal positional ver- ent underlying pathophysiology than the generally ac- tigo (BPPV) is probably the most common cause of ver- cepted canalolithiasis theory. We investigated 5 patients tigo [1] and the most common peripheral vestibular disor- who did not respond to physical treatment, presented der [2, 3]. It is a positional vertigo of sudden onset, trig- with an atypical concomitant nystagmus or both with gered by rapid changes of head and body position and high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance with concomitant nystagmus of short duration.
    [Show full text]