Friday 1St December 2006 Follow Signs to Building 22 Jamieson Street Off Holker Street Sydney Olympic Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Friday 1St December 2006 Follow Signs to Building 22 Jamieson Street Off Holker Street Sydney Olympic Park NEWSLETTER No. 86 THE FROG AND TADPOLE STUDY GROUP OF NSW INC December 2006 Email [email protected] PO Box 296 Rockdale NSW 2216 . Website www.fats.org.au ABN 34 282 154 794 You are invited to our next FATS meeting at 6.30 pm for a 7.00 pm start Friday 1st December 2006 Follow signs to Building 22 Jamieson Street off Holker Street Sydney Olympic Park CONTENTS Corroboree tadpole Pseudophryne corroboree photo from Marion Anstis’ comprehensive book “Tadpoles of South-eastern Australia” Last meetings speakers Monica Wangmann Kosciuszko National Park Join the Frogmobile helpers 11am to 4pm Sunday 28 January Corroboree field trip report p2 & 3 2007, at Centennial Park’s duck pond. Meet new people. Learn continued on pages 4,5,6 & 10 new skills. Help our frogs, whilst having fun. No previous Hill-Topping by butterflies p4 experience required. Call Lothar on 0419 249 728 See page 9 Alpine Tree Frog p4 & 5 Southern Corroboree frog p5 & 6 MEETING FORMAT for 1st December 2006 How to get to Strickland Forest p7 6.30 pm Adult White Lip, Gracilenta, Fallax and Peron juvenile lost FATS President’s report 2006 p7 frogs need homes and are ready to collect from the Rescue How to get to the FATS meeting p7 Service. Please bring your FATS membership card FATS financial statement p8 and Amphibian Licence. New FATS member Lewis Hahn p8 Where the FrogMobile went p9 7.00 pm Welcome and announcements. FATS meeting (continued) 7.30 pm Main Speakers: Henry Cook will be talking about the Speakers George Mandani, Herpetofauna of the Kimberlys. Grant Webster and Arthur White Lothar Voigt will be speaking about building frog ponds. Committee contacts p10 Naples daily News Sept. 2006 p10 8.15pm 5 Favourite Slides. Tell us about your recent frogging trips or Water and steep sides don’t mix p11 experiences. If you have slides or other images, bring them Field trips & ARP Xmas Party p12 along as well. Door prize and guessing competition, followed by light refreshments and pleasant conversation.1 We had just arrived, when Dave caught a female FATS MEETING OCTOBER 2006 Mountain Grasshopper Acripeza reticulata. Her n late 2005 the Victorian Amphibian Research beautiful vivid red and blue colours were spectacular. ICentre held a fund raiser for research to save the Gerry photographed it. When I came home I tried to Southern Corroboree Frogs Pseudophryne corroboree. identify it but there were no pictures even similar on the The magnificent frog calendar for 2006 were sold for web or in my field guides. Martyn Robinson from the $10 and FATS purchased about 15 in December, Australian Museum said that the photo was raising $150 for the Corroboree Frog project. exceptionally good and that there were very few decent photos of female Mountain Grasshoppers available. I’m hoping that the photos will end up in the ARC web page so that it might be internationally accessible to others. The scientific cabin, on a hill, was of unexpected comfort, with a large dormitory, huge windows overlooking the expansive landscape, separate bathroom, shower, flush toilet and eat in kitchen. On Saturday night we drove to local pond to see endangered Alpine Tree Frogs Litoria verreauxii alpina. The pond area was extremely dry but we were lucky enough to find three metamorphs. Their population size is known to be decreasing. Suspected threatening processes include: . Direct human impact / urbanisation / tourism Prizes included a trip to Corroboree Frog country to see . Inappropriate catchment management, including the endangered frogs at some of the 15 remaining sites. degraded water quality John and Susan Stephens from the Australian Plant Society . Exotic predators (e.g. trout, Gambusia) Latrobe Valley Group and Bill (my husband) and I were . UV-B the winners of the “all expenses paid” field trip. Disease/pathogens (e.g. chytrid fungus, viruses) . Global warming and other climate changes In March 2006 our guides for this fabulous weekend field . Habitat modification (e.g. vegetation clearing, trip were Gerry Marantelli from the Victorian Frog Group invasive weeds) and Amphibian Research Centre (ARC) and Dave Hunter from the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. They invited us to Kosciuszko National Park. (Dave Hunter had given a presentation to FATS at our August meeting.) The trip by car from Sydney took 6.5 hours. Bill and I arrived at about 5pm on Saturday afternoon. The winding roads and scenery of Kosciuszko National Park were spectacular with diverse flora and fauna such as wild horses, emus, kangaroos, wombats, copperhead snakes and many varieties of insects and birds. Monica Wangmann with female Mountain Grasshopper Alpine Tree Frog metamorph Litoria verreauxii alpina On Sunday, thanks to our guides, we visited a mountain fire tower which has restricted access. Whilst enjoying a sumptuous picnic lunch, surrounded by spectacular views of the Jagungal Park, we experienced a butterfly congregation also known as mountain-topping, an important social event in the life cycle of many butterflies. (See page Corroboree Frog spawn rescued March 2006 John and Susan Stephens, Australian Plant Society on the fire tower, Jagungal Wilderness March 2006. Many of the field trip photos and the sound file of Dave Hunter calling the Corroboree Frogs and their feeble The third site had one male caller whose nest had been trashed responses (it was getting cold) were from John Stephens. probably by a wombat. When the calls were played at our meeting you could even All sites suffer from the invasion of Crinia signifera. Most of hear the flies buzzing. What an excellent digital camera John. this species carry chytrid and are locally known as “Typhoid Thank you so much John and Susan. Mary”. Alpine Tree Frog metamorphs Many thanks to Gerry Marantelli, Dave Hunter, Lydia Fucsko, John and Susan Stephens, David Nelson, Katherine Wangmann and Marion Anstis for their help in making the trip so memorable and/or making the presentation possible at the FATS meeting. Monica Wangmann Underbelly of Southern Corroboree Frog On Sunday afternoon we traveled to three of the 15 known Corroboree Frog sites. At each site our shoes were sprayed to prevent cross infection. At the first site there were no frogs calling. At the second site, one frog was calling in response to Dave’s calls. It may have been from Gerry’s earlier release of tadpoles or frogs two years ago. Dave and Gerry harvested over 100 eggs from one nest. These will be raised into tadpoles and metamorphs and returned to the remaining viable sphagnum moss bog sites. The rescue program to save this species from imminent extinction is an integrated effort by Federal and State government departments and community groups. Members of this collaborative effort include the Federal CSIRO laboratory in Geelong (you may remember Lee Berger from there and her work on Chytrid), the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation and the Amphibian Research Centre. Gerry Marantelli from the ARC has personally funded a great deal of the rescue costs. changes in the appearance of a site can result in males not LOSS AND/OR DEGRADATION OF SITES recognising it as a suitable site……….. USED FOR HILL-TOPPING BY BUTTERFLIES - KEY THREATENING 5. Butterflies which hill-top in NSW and whose populations could PROCESS DECLARATION become threatened if hilltopping sites were lost include: Hesperiidae such as Neohesperilla xanthomera and Hesperilla crypsigramma; (extracts from the web site) Lycaenidae such as Acrodipsas arcana, Acrodipsas brisbanensis, SW Scientific Committee - final determination. Acrodipsas cuprea, Acrodipsas mortoni, Acrodipsas myrmecophila, Ogyris genoveva, Ogyris olane, Ogyris oretes, Deudorix epijarbas NThe Scientific Committee, established by the and Candalides cyprotus; and Theclinae such as Hypochrysops Threatened Species Conservation Act, has made a ignitus and Hypochrysops delica. Final Determination to list the "Loss and/or degradation of sites used for hill-topping by Proposed Gazettal date: 20/04/01 Exhibition period: 20/04/01 – butterflies" as a KEY THREATENING PROCESS 25/05/01 on Schedule 3 of the Act. Listing of Key Threatening Record of hearing and Court's judgement; Ku-ring-gai Council-ats- Processes is provided for by Part 2 of the Act. Lean; Premises 153 - 165 Grosvenor Street Wahroonga; Land and The Scientific Committee has found that: Environment Court Proceedings No. 10457 of 1996. 1. Hill-topping in butterflies is a very complex http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/npws.nsf/Content/Loss+an behaviour that often facilitates meeting of the sexes d+or+degradation+of+sites+used+for+hill+topping+by+butterfli (Shields, 1967; Atkins, 1975; Common and es+key+threatening+process+declaration EXTRACTS ONLY Waterhouse, 1981; Baughman and Murphy, 1988; LITORIA VERREAUXII ALPINA VERREAUX'S FROG Sands, 1993; New, 1997; Newland, 1997). Hill-tops act as a focus for mating. Many butterfly species, especially escription: The colour patterns of this frog vary a lot in the families Hesperiidae, Papilionidae and Dbetween individuals. The lowland populations can range Lycaenidae appear to be obligatory hill-toppers and from fawn, brown to red-brown on their backs with darker tend to congregate on hill or ridge tops that are usually flecks. A dark broad band starts between the eyes and runs higher than the surrounding countryside. The nature of down the back. This broad band is divided by a pale stripe the sites varies and a site may be as small as a few running down the spine. A dark stripe runs from the nostril to square metres or may cover several hectares, or display the eye. Behind the eye the stripe broadens to enclose the minor or very marked topographic relief. The same sites tympanum (tight membrane covering the entrance to the ear) are used year after year, whilst apparently similar and then breaks into a series of blotches down the side of the nearby sites may not be used.
Recommended publications
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? – a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Martin Wiemers* and Konrad Fiedler Address: Department of Population Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Email: Martin Wiemers* - [email protected]; Konrad Fiedler - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 7 March 2007 Received: 1 December 2006 Accepted: 7 March 2007 Frontiers in Zoology 2007, 4:8 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-8 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/8 © 2007 Wiemers and Fiedler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: DNA barcoding, i.e. the use of a 648 bp section of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I, has recently been promoted as useful for the rapid identification and discovery of species. Its success is dependent either on the strength of the claim that interspecific variation exceeds intraspecific variation by one order of magnitude, thus establishing a "barcoding gap", or on the reciprocal monophyly of species. Results: We present an analysis of intra- and interspecific variation in the butterfly family Lycaenidae which includes a well-sampled clade (genus Agrodiaetus) with a peculiar characteristic: most of its members are karyologically differentiated from each other which facilitates the recognition of species as reproductively isolated units even in allopatric populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2003 Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Mathew, John. "Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation" (2003). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/v7rh-mb21 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/74 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYLOGENY, ECOLOGY, AND CONSERVATION by John Mathew B.Sc. June 1990, Madras Christian College M.Sc. June 1992, Madras Christian College M.Phil. May 1994, Madras University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2003 Approved by: Deborah A. Waller (Co-Director) »mi E. Pierce (Co-Director) H. Savitzky (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYTOGENY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION John Mathew Old Dominion University, 2003 Co-Directors of Advisory Committee: Dr. Deborah A. Waller Dr. Naomi E. Pierce Less than 1% of all Lepidoptera are aphytophagous; of these, a considerable proportion is found in the family Lycaenidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Ants Enhance Diversification in Lycaenid Butterflies? Phylogeographic Evidence from a Model Myrmecophile, Jalmenus Evagoras
    Evolution, 60(2), 2006, pp. 315±327 DO ANTS ENHANCE DIVERSIFICATION IN LYCAENID BUTTERFLIES? PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FROM A MODEL MYRMECOPHILE, JALMENUS EVAGORAS ROD EASTWOOD,1,2 NAOMI E. PIERCE,3,4 R. L. KITCHING,1,5 AND JANE M. HUGHES1,6 1Australian School of Environmental Studies, Grif®th University, Nathan 4111, Queensland, Australia 2E-mail: r.eastwood@grif®th.edu.au 3Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 4E-mail: [email protected] 5E-mail: r.kitching@grif®th.edu.au 6E-mail: jane.hughes@grif®th.edu.au Abstract. The ant-tended Australian butter¯y, Jalmenus evagoras, has been a model system for studying the ecology and evolution of mutualism. A phylogeographic analysis of mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I sequences from 242 butter¯ies (615 bp) and 66 attendant ants (585 bp) from 22 populations was carried out to explore the relationship between ant association and butter¯y population structure. This analysis revealed 12 closely related butter¯y haplotypes in three distinct clades roughly corresponding to three allopatric subpopulations of the butter¯ies. Minimal genetic diversity and widespread haplotypes within biogeographical regions suggest high levels of matrilineal gene ¯ow. Attendant ants are signi®cantly more diverse than was previously thought, with at least seven well-de®ned clades corresponding to independent morphological determinations, distributed throughout the range of the butter¯ies. Nested analysis of molecular variance showed that biogeography, host plant, and ant associate all contribute signi®cantly in explaining variation in butter¯y genetic diversity, but these variables are not independent of one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory and Parasitic Lepidoptera: Carnivores Living on Plants
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 49(4), 1995, 412-453 PREDATORY AND PARASITIC LEPIDOPTERA: CARNIVORES LIVING ON PLANTS NAOMI E. PIERCE Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA ABSTRACT. Moths and butterflies whose larvae do not feed on plants represent a decided minority slice of lepidopteran diversity, yet offer insights into the ecology and evolution of feeding habits. This paper summarizes the life histories of the known pred­ atory and parasitic lepidopteran taxa, focusing in detail on current research in the butterfly family Lycaenidae, a group disproportionately rich in aphytophagous feeders and myr­ mecophilous habits. More than 99 percent of the 160,000 species of Lepidoptera eat plants (Strong et al. 1984, Common 1990). Plant feeding is generally associated with high rates of evolutionary diversification-while only 9 of the 30 extant orders of insects (Kristensen 1991) feed on plants, these orders contain more than half of the total number of insect species (Ehrlich & Raven 1964, Southwood 1973, Mitter et al. 1988, cf. Labandiera & Sepkoski 1993). Phytophagous species are characterized by specialized diets, with fewer than 10 percent having host ranges of more than three plant families (Bernays 1988, 1989), and butterflies being particularly host plant-specific (e.g., Remington & Pease 1955, Remington 1963, Ehrlich & Raven 1964). This kind of life history specialization and its effects on population structure may have contributed to the diversification of phytophages by promoting population subdivision and isolation (Futuyma & Moreno 1988, Thompson 1994). Many studies have identified selective forces giving rise to differences in niche breadth (Berenbaum 1981, Scriber 1983, Rausher 1983, Denno & McClure 1983, Strong et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 16B. from Moonlight Jewels to Common Browns: Butterfly
    From Moonlight Jewels to Common Browns: Butterfly accounts for the ACT Suzi Bond1 and Michael Vardon2 1 Australian Bureau of Statistics, [email protected] 2 Australian National University, [email protected] Abstract We present a set of novel SEEA butterfly accounts for the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia. These accounts identify the theoretical and practical issues in producing biodiversity accounts and assess the implications of such biodiversity accounts for public policy and the management of species and public areas in the ACT and beyond. The accounts are to be used in ACT State of Environment reporting and considered for broader national biodiversity application. The butterfly accounts span from 1978 to 2018, and the data sources and methods underpinning the accounts are detailed in the paper. The accounts aim to eventually include butterfly species presence and abundance by habitat type and season for each survey year and between two points in time, butterfly species area of distribution by habitat and a land cover account. These types of biodiversity accounts will support the development of the SEEA-EEA framework and the UN ambition to elevate the system to an international standard. They demonstrate the flexibility of SEEA for presenting a range of ecosystem and environmental information. 1 1. Introduction The best method for including biodiversity in the System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA) has been a vexing question for more than a decade. The specific call for including biodiversity values in national accounts in Target 2 of the Biodiversity Strategy Plan (2011-2020) for the Convention on Biological Diversity provided an impetus for this work and also coincided with the processes for elevating the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (EEA) to an international statistical standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Community No.1 Version Has Been Prepared for Web Publication
    #6 This Action Statement was first published in 1991 and remains current. This Butterfly Community No.1 version has been prepared for web publication. It retains the original text of the action statement, although contact information, the distribution map and the illustration may have been updated. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 Published by the Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria. Butterfly Community No. 1 Distribution in Victoria (SAC Database/DSE 2003) 8 Nicholson Street, (Illustration by John Las Gourgues) East Melbourne, and woodland. There is a mixed-age Victoria 3002 Australia Description and Distribution Butterfly Community No. 1 is an association of Broad-leaved Peppermint This publication may be of assemblage of flora and fauna characterised (Eucalyptus dives), Long-leaved Box assistance to you but the by the presence of a large number of (Eucalyptus goniocalyx), Red Stringybark State of Victoria and its significant, rare and extremely rare (Eucalyptus macrorhyncha) and Messmate employees do not guarantee invertebrate species. It contains 20 species (Eucalyptus obliqua) with understorey shrubs that the publication is of butterflies, including the Large Ant-blue and grasses. without flaw of any kind or (Acrodipsas brisbanensis cyrilus Anderson The only known occurrence of this is wholly appropriate for community is restricted to the immediate your particular purposes and Spry 1897) and the Small Ant-blue vicinity of Mt Piper, a steep and solitary and therefore disclaims all (Acrodipsas myrmecophila Waterhouse liability for any error, loss and Lyell 1913), the Northern Dusky Blue mountain rising from 230 m to 456 m above or other consequence which (Candalides hyacinthinus simplex Tepper an undulating plain between the Tallarook may arise from you relying 1882), the Common Albatross (Appias and Mt William ranges in central Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 March 2013, 381 P
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/273257107 Mason, P. G., D. R. Gillespie & C. Vincent (Eds.) 2013. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Pucón, Chile, 4-8 March 2013, 381 p. CONFERENCE PAPER · MARCH 2013 DOWNLOADS VIEWS 626 123 3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Peter Mason Charles Vincent Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 96 PUBLICATIONS 738 CITATIONS 239 PUBLICATIONS 1,902 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Charles Vincent Retrieved on: 13 August 2015 The correct citation of this work is: Peter G. Mason, David R. Gillespie and Charles Vincent (Eds.). 2013. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Pucón, Chile, 4-8 March 2013, 380 p. Proceedings of the 4th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS Pucón, Chile March 4-8, 2013 Peter G. Mason, David R. Gillespie and Charles Vincent (Eds.) 4th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS Pucón, Chile, March 4-8, 2013 PREFACE The Fourth International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, held in Pucón – Chile, continues the series of international symposia on the biological control of arthropods organized every four years. The first meeting was in Hawaii – USA during January 2002, followed by the Davos - Switzerland meeting during September 2005, and the Christchurch – New Zealand meeting during February 2009. The goal of these symposia is to create a forum where biological control researchers and practitioners can meet and exchange information, to promote discussions of up to date issues affecting biological control, particularly pertaining to the use of parasitoids and predators as biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrodipsas Illidgei (Lycaenidae)
    Journal of the Lepidopterists Society 52(2), 1998, 139-150 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE RARE, MYRMECOPHAGOUS ILLIDGE'S ANT-BLUE BUTTERFLY, ACRODIPSAS ILLIDGEI (LYCAENIDAE) JAMES P. BEALE Entomology Department, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 4072 ABSTRACT. A survey of 591 branch sections containing arboreal ant colonies on 197 trees was undertaken over four consecutive seasons for the presence of immature Acrodipsas illidgei (Waterhouse and Lyell) in and adjacent to mangroves at Mary River Heads, Queensland, Australia. A. illidgei was found in 1.7% of ant colony sections sam­ pled (i.e., 10 colony sections on five Avicennia marina (Forssk.) trees). Despite the small number of immatures discovered, A. illidgei showed a strong tendency to occur in speCific ant colonies over time. The host ant, Crematogaster sp. (laeviceps group F. Smith) (For­ micidae: Myrmicinae), was common and Widespread within the survey area. The mean seasonal level of adult ant activity outside the nest pOSitively correlated to mean seasonal ant brood levels within nests but were significantly linked only in spring and autumn. New information supports the hypotheSiS that ant colony odour selection by ovipositing female A. illidgei is the prime influence on this butterfly's localized distribution. Additional key words: localized distribution, conservation, mangrove, Cremato­ gaster, Australia. The genus Acrodipsas Sands (Lycaenidae: Theclinae) is unique to Australia and contains eight described and at least one undescribed spe­ cies (Sands et al. 1997, Sands, pers. comm,), All Acrodipsas species are known or suspected to have larvae that feed on ants (Sands 1979, Com­ mon & Waterhouse 1981), Acrodipsas illidgei (Waterhouse & Lyell) has an obligate, myrmecophagous relationship with the arboreal ant, Cre­ matogaster sp, (laeviceps group F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Association and Speciation in Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): Consequences of Novel Adaptations and Pleistocene Climate Changes
    Ant Association and Speciation in Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): Consequences of Novel Adaptations and Pleistocene Climate Changes Author Eastwood, Rodney Gordon Published 2006 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Australian School of Environmental Studies DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2467 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365668 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au ANT ASSOCIATION AND SPECIATION IN LYCAENIDAE (LEPIDOPTERA): CONSEQUENCES OF NOVEL ADAPTATIONS AND PLEISTOCENE CLIMATE CHANGES Rodney Gordon Eastwood B.Sc. (AES) (Hons) Australian School of Environmental Studies Faculty of Environmental Sciences Griffith University 7 April 2006 Supervisors Jane M. Hughes Roger L. Kitching Naomi E. Pierce Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Rod Eastwood 2006 ii Jalmenus evagoras pupae with attendant Iridomyrmex gracilis ants. Adult male butterfly at right. Theclinesthes albocincta larvae and adult male on Adriana host plant Photos by Roger Grund iii iv SYNOPSIS The butterfly family Lycaenidae (including the Riodinidae) contains an estimated 30% of all butterfly species and exhibits a diverse array of life history strategies. The early stages of most lycaenids associate with ants to varying degrees, ranging from casual facultative coexistence through to obligate association where the long-term survival of the butterfly is dependent on the presence of its attendant ants. Attendant ants guard the butterflies against predators and parasites during their vulnerable period of larval growth and pupation. The caterpillars, in return, reward the ants by providing attractive secretions from specialized glands in their cuticle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology and Evolution of Ant Association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera)
    1 Nov 2001 10:50 AR AR147-24.tex AR147-24.sgm ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002. 47:733–71 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF ANT ASSOCIATION IN THE LYCAENIDAE (LEPIDOPTERA) Naomi E. Pierce,1 Michael F. Braby,1 Alan Heath,2 David J. Lohman,1 John Mathew,1 Douglas B. Rand,1 and Mark A. Travassos1 1Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; doug [email protected]; [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words myrmecophily, parasitism, butterfly, symbiosis, biogeography ■ Abstract The estimated 6000 species of Lycaenidae account for about one third of all Papilionoidea. The majority of lycaenids have associations with ants that can be facultative or obligate and range from mutualism to parasitism. Lycaenid larvae and pu- pae employ complex chemical and acoustical signals to manipulate ants. Cost/benefit analyses have demonstrated multiple trade-offs involved in myrmecophily. Both demo- graphic and phylogenetic evidence indicate that ant association has shaped the evolution of obligately associated groups. Parasitism typically arises from mutualism with ants, and entomophagous species are disproportionately common in the Lycaenidae com- pared with other Lepidoptera. Obligate associations are more common in the Southern Hemisphere, in part because highly ant-associated lineages make up a larger proportion of the fauna in these regions. Further research on phylogeny and natural history, partic- ularly of the Neotropical fauna, will be necessary to understand the role ant association has played in the evolution of the Lycaenidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 385.8KB .Pdf File
    'Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56(2):383-388 ( 1997) 28 February 1997 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1997.56.28 ANT TRAP NESTS ENABLE DETECTION OF A RARE AND LOCALISED BUTTERFL y ' ACRODTPSAS MYRMECOPH/LA (WATERHOUSE AND LYELL) (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) IN THE FIELD D.R. BRITTON Department of Biological Sciences. University of Wollongong, Northlields Avenue, Wollongong. NSW 2522, Australia Abstract Britton. D.R., 1997. Ant trap nests enable detection of a rare and localised butterfly, Acrod­ ipsas mrrmecophila (Waterhouse and Lyell) (Lepidoptcra: Lycaenidae) in the field. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria56(2): 383-387. Location of the ant Papyrius nitidus is essential in order to determine critical habitat for the rare butterfly Acrodipsas myrmecophila, which is known in Victoria from a single locality (Mount Piper). This paper describes the location of P. nitidus colonies at Mount Piper and the subsequent detection of immature stages of A. mynnecophila in a P. nitidus colony. The benefitsof trap nests for detection, observation and conservation of the ant/butterfly associ­ ation are outlined and discussed. Introduction Wandin, Heathmont and Ringwood, and the The Small Ant-blue, Acrodipsas myrmecophila original colonies at Broadford have disap­ (Waterhouse and Lyell), is a rare butterfly in peared. It is also known from a few specimens Victoria, and is scarce and localised throughout taken at isolated localities (mostly hill-tops) in the rest of Australia. It has a single current Vic­ New South Wales, Queensland (including a torian locality at Mount Piper (32"12'S, single record fromCape York), and from a single I 45°0'E), where occasional adult individuals record near Darwin, in the Northern Territory have been taken from the summit of the mount (Common and Waterhouse, 1981; Dunn and since 1978 (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal of Wildlife Trade Operation to Harvest and Export Invertebrates
    September 2012 Proposal for Wild Harvest and Export of Invertebrates submitted for approval under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 1. Introduction In 1982, the applicants who recognised the full potential and value of the property to the initial establishing of their insect farming business purchased 80 acres of dense lowland rainforest. Areas of the property, prior to its purchase by the applicants, had been used for extractive processes such as a quarry and for logging. Other past activities that also affected the integrity of the property were cattle grazing and an attempt at establishing a deer farm. A total of 20 acres were clear felled to enable the cattle grazing and deer farming to occur. To assist recovery of the acreage, surveys were conducted and relevant areas for rehabilitation were identified and addressed. The past 30 years has seen an astounding proliferation of fauna numbers as well as an improvement of habitat for many species. Priority to land management is a key factor in the efficiency of the farm and its projects. Areas within the acreage have been identified and allocated to allow for the farm activities while maintaining the bulk of the acreage for non-business practices. Present operations are conducted on approximately 20 acres. This area lies within a section of the property, which was 75 years earlier totally cleared for cattle grazing and a typical example of regrowth rainforest. The property is listed under “Land for Wildlife” Queensland. This business has grown from what was initially established to operate as a breeding facility, catering to public demand for invertebrate specimens for use in research, education, natural history documentaries, personal interests and various other applications.
    [Show full text]