A Service of
Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics
Hunt, Jennifer
Working Paper Why do people still live in East Germany?
DIW Discussion Papers, No. 201
Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin)
Suggested Citation: Hunt, Jennifer (2000) : Why do people still live in East Germany?, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 201, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin
This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/18197
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use:
Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes.
Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 'LVNXVVLRQVSDSLHUH 'LVFXVVLRQ3DSHUV
'LVFXVVLRQ3DSHU1R
:K\GR3HRSOH6WLOO/LYH ,Q(DVW*HUPDQ\"
E\ -HQQLIHU+XQW
%HUOLQ)HEUXDU\
7KLVSDSHUZDVZULWWHQZKLOHWKHDXWKRUZDVDYLVLWLQJSURIHVVRUDWWKH'HXWVFKHV,QVWLWXWIU :LUWVFKDIWVIRUVFKXQJ ',:
'HXWVFKHV,QVWLWXWIU:LUWVFKDIWVIRUVFKXQJ%HUOLQ .|QLJLQ/XLVH6WU%HUOLQ 3KRQH )D[ ,QWHUQHWKWWSZZZGLZGH ,661 hy2ho2eople2till2vive2sn2ist2qermnyc
tennifer2runt
le2 niversity
pirst2versionX2xovemer2IWWW
his2versionX2perury2PHHH
s2m2very2grteful2to2egin2iphhnD2enn2ruff2tevens2nd2wihel2furd2for2omments2nd
disussionsD2nd2to2prtiipnts2in2seminrs2t2the2heutshes2snstitut2für2irtshftsforshungD
rumoldt2 niversity2@ferlinAD2uonstnzD2vusnneD2wunih2nd2oulouseF2s2thnk2ennette
f e rgemnnD2frr2hietzD2uurt2qeppertD2teffen2wretzke2@fundesmt2für2fuwesen2und
umordnungAD2relmut2eitz2nd2tohim2olff2for2providing2dtD2nd2türgen2hupp2for2help
using2the2qyi2dtF2his2pper2ws2written2while2s2ws22visiting2professor2t2the2heutshes
snstitut2für2irtshftsforshungF22s2m2lso2ffilited2with2xfiD2giD2se2nd2the2hvidson
snstituteF estrt
sn2IWWU2qh2per2pit2in2ist2qermny2ws2SU72of2tht2of2est2qermnyD2wge2rtes2were
US72of2western2levelsD2nd2the2unemployment2rte2ws2t2lest2doule2the2western2rte2of2UFV7F
yne2 would2expet2tht2if2pitl2flows2nd2trde2in2goods2filed2to2ring2onvergeneD2lor
flows2would2respondD2enhning2overll2effiienyF2et2net2emigrtion2from2ist2qermny2hs
fllen2from2high2levels2in2IWVWEIWWH2to2lose2to2zeroF2 sing2stteElevel2dt2for2ll2of2qermnyD
v ille2 from2IWWIEIWWTD2s2m2le2to2explin2the2downwrd2trend2in2est2to2west2migrtion
using2wge2nd2unemployment2informtionF2gonvergene2in2hourly2wges2is2the2most2importnt
ftorF2 enlysis2of2the2estern2smple2of2the2qermn2oioEionomi2nel2for2IWWHEIWWU
suggests2tht2ommuting2is2unlikely2to2sustitute2sustntilly2for2emigrtionF2he2individulElevel
dt2further2indite2tht2emigrnts2re2disproportiontely2young2nd2skilledD2nd2tht2individuls
suffering22lyoff2or2nonEemployment2spell2re2lso2muh2more2likely2to2emigrteF22 sn2IWWU2qh2per2pit2in2ist2qermny2ws2SU72of2tht2of2est2qermnyD2wge2rtes
were2US72of2western2levelsD2nd2the2unemployment2rteD2lthough2hrd2to2mesureD2ws2t2lest
doule2the2western2rte2of2UFV7F22gonvergene2with2the2west2hd2essentilly2ome2to22hltF2et
net2 emigrtion2from2ist2qermny2hd2fllen2from2high2levels2to2lose2to2zeroD2n2pprent
puzzleF
ionomists2hve2vrious2theories2onerning2mehnisms2tht2ould2led2to2onvergene
in2 living2 stndrds2 ross2 regions2 or2 ountriesD2 therey2 enhning2 world2 effiienyD2 if2 the
eonomies2re2linked2through2trde2or2ftor2moilityF22rtiulrly2within2ountriesD2one2would
expet2tht2if2flows2of2goods2nd2pitl2were2not2suffiient2to2ring2onvergeneD2it2would2our
t h rough2flows2of2lorF22here2is2evidene2for2the2 nited2ttes2tht2suh2equlizing2flows2of
lor2re2n2importnt2regionl2djustment2mehnism2@flnhrd2nd2utz2IWWPAD2ut2in2iurope
this2mehnism2is2muh2weker2@heressin2nd2ptás2IWWSAF2e2prtiulrly2striking2exmple2of
persistent2differenes2in2regionl2development2is2the2northEsouth2differene2within2stlyF
he2unifition2of2qermny2provides2n2opportunity2to2oserve2the2djustment2proess
following2 the2merging2of2two2eonomies2whih2previously2hd2little2exhnge2of2goods2or
ftorsD2nd2whih2hd2very2different2levels2of2developmentX2wges2in2the2est2were2initilly2less
thn2hlf2the2wges2in2the2westF22he2opportunity2to2move2from2est2to2west2emerged2in2the2lte
summer2of2IWVWF22prom2this2time2until2the2period2following2estern2eletions2in2wrh2IWWHD2the
politil2future2of2ist2qermny2ws2unertinD2nd2thus2politil2onsidertions2s2well2s2the
possiility2tht2the2emigrtion2window2might2lose2ontriuted2to2the2lrge2initil2flows2from2est
to2 westF22pigure2I2shows2tht2in2IWVW2nd2IWWH2RHHDHHH2individuls2per2yer2moved2from2est
to2westD2or2lmost2PFS72of2the2estern2popultion2per2yerF22yne2eonomi2nd2politil2union
were2greed2uponD2eonomi2onsidertions2remined2s2the2min2determinnt2of2the2migrtion
1 deisionF22e2ommon2lngugeD2similr2edution2systemsD22shred2ulturl2historyD2nd22shred
politil2history2prior2to2the2seond2world2wr2would2e2expeted2to2filitte2migrtionF22st2is
possile2 tht2some2individulsD2initilly2optimisti2out2the2possiility2of2rpid2onvergene
through2pitl2flows2nd2other2mehnismsD2might2hve2preferred2to2dely2emigrtionF22ine
onvergene2hs2now2essentilly2hlted2nd2looks2unlikely2to2resumeD2howeverD2one2might2expet
n 2inrese2in2the2emigrtion2rteF2pigure2I2showsD2howeverD2tht2emigrtion2fell2gretly2in
IWWIEIWWQD2 nd2 remined2 stedy2 therefterF2 2 wigrtion2 from2 west2 to2 est2 ws2 menwhile
inresingD2so2tht2y2IWWR2net2emigrtion2from2the2est2ws2smllD2nd2gross2emigrtion2equl
to2only2out2I72of2the2IWVV2popultionF
here2re22few2possile2explntions2for2low2emigrtionF2he2geogrphy2of2qermny2nd
the2enlve2of2est2ferlin2men2dily2ommuting2from2est2to2west2is2more2fesile2thn
ommuting2etween2southern2nd2northern2stlyD2nd2ommuting2my2sustitute2for2emigrtionF
his2 would2hve2een22prtiulrly2ttrtive2option2for2individuls2in2the2erly2yers2who
expeted2 onvergene2 to2 e2rpid2nd2did2not2wnt2to2inur2the2fixed2ost2of2movingF2enother
possiility2is2tht2the2lrge2erly2outflowsD2influened2y2politil2onsidertionsD2hve2left2ehind
individuls2with2lrge2moving2ostsF22e2third2onsidertion2is2tht2mutul2suspiion2or2ulturl
differenes2etween2esterners2nd2westerners2redue2migrtionX2westerners2onsider2esterners
to2e2lzy2nd2resent2the2tx2inreses2tht2hve2finned2unifitionD2while2esterners2resent
westerners2influene2nd2superior2irsD2nd2feel2westerners2do2not2shre22ommon2reent2historyF
e2finl2possiilityD2howeverD2is2tht2the2low2net2est2to2west2flows2disguise2gross2flows2whih2re
in2ft2no2lower2thn2flows2etween2western2regionsD2whih2re2themselves2heterogeneousF
sn2this2pper2s2investigte2whether2wge2nd2unemployment2levels2in2different2regions2nd
their2 evolution2over2time2n2explin2the2ptterns2of2est2to2west2migrtion2oservedF2s2use
2 stteElevel2dt2for2ll2of2qermny2for2this2purposeD2s2well2s2dt2for2smller2regionsD2nd2use
f l o ws2within2est2qermny2s22omprison2pointF2s2lso2use2individulElevel2dt2from2the
qermn2oioEionomi2nel2@qyiA2to2exmine2the2individul2determinnts2of2emigrtion
f r om2 the2 estF2 2 s2 test2 whether2 the2 hrteristis2 of2 emigrnts2 onform2 to2 those2 predited
theoretillyD2 ssess2how2emigrnts2nd2ommuters2differD2nd2test2whether2ommuting2nd
emigrtion2re2sustitutesF
sing2 the2 stteElevel2 dt2from2IWWIEIWWTD2s2m2le2to2explin2the2downwrd2trend2in
e st2 to2 west2 migrtionD2 reltive2 to2 the2 withinEwest2 trendD2 using2 wge2 nd2 unemployment
informtionF2ge2onvergene2etween2est2nd2west2is2the2most2importnt2ftorF2s2m2lso
le2to2explin2westEest2nd2withinEest2trendsF22he2IWWI2level2of2est2to2west2flows2is2lower
thn2predited2y2the2ovritesD2ut2evidene2t2the2level2of2smller2regions2shows2tht2this2is
due2to2ggregtionF2he2ontinued2presene2of2people2in2ist2qermny2is2thus2no2more2puzzling
thn2the2presene2of2people2in2less2prosperous2regions2of2est2qermnyF
sing2the2qyi2dt2from2IWWHEIWWU2s2onfirm2the2predition2of2the2oy2modelD2tht
due2to2lower2wge2inequlity2in2the2estD2emigrnts2to2the2west2re2likely2to2e2the2etter2skilledD
l t hough2the2strongest2preditor2of2emigrtion2is2youthF22e2ommon2type2of2ommuter2or
emigrnt2is22young2person2pursuing2studies2in2the2westD2while2nother2ommon2type2of2emigrnt
is22young2person2who2moves2to2the2west2on2ompletion2of2tertiry2edution2in2the2estF22hese
results2 suggest2 tht2emigrtionD2lthough2not2very2highD2my2nevertheless2e2detrimentl2to2the
ist2qermn2eonomyF22he2proility2of2emigrting2is2twie2s2high2for2individuls2who2re
lid2off2or2experiening22nonEemployment2spellF2roweverD22lidEoff2individul2is2twie2s2likely
to2ommute2s2to2emigrteF22sndividuls2living2ner2the2order2with2the2west2@other2thn2ferlinA
re2muh2more2likely2to2ommuteD2nd2slightly2less2likely2to2emigrteF22sndividuls2living2ner
3 est2ferlin2re2muh2more2likely2to2ommuteD2nd2eqully2likely2to2emigrteF2his2suggests2tht
ommuting2does2sustitute2to2some2extent2for2emigrtionD2lthough2the2trnsitory2nture2of
ommutingD2the2sene2of2sustitution2in2the2ferlin2reD2nd2the2possiility2of2using2ommuting
s22springord2for2emigrtion2suggest2tht2emigrtion2is2unlikely2to2hve2een2redued2gretly
y2ommutingF2
fkground
sn2the2lte2summer2of2IWVWD2it2eme2possile2to2leve2ist2qermny2vi2rungryD2due
to22hnge2in2rungrin2poliyF2olitil2onessions2were2mde2in2ist2qermny2in2response
to2puli2disontentD2nd2with2the2fll2of2the2ferlin2wll2on2W2xovemer2IWVWD2diret2migrtion
from2 ist2to2est2qermny2eme2possileF22iletions2held2in2wrh2IWWH2showed2strong
support2for2prties2supporting2speedy2unifition2with2the2westD2reduing2the2politil2motive2for
emigrtion2from2the2estF22wonetryD2eonomi2nd2soil2union2ourred2in2tuly2IWWHD2with2the
eonomilly2less2importnt2politil2union2following2in2ytoerF
he2high2est2to2west2migrtion2flows2were2onsidered2n2importnt2issue2t2the2time2of
monetry2unionD2oth2y2those2whose2onern2ws2tht2western2wges2might2therey2fllD2nd
y2those2who2fered2tht22rinEdrin2or2youthEdrin2more2generlly2would2redue2the2eonomi
development2prospets2of2the2estF22he2onern2out2the2link2etween2migrtion2nd2western
wges2lmost2ertinly2plyed22role2in2the2wge2rgining2tht2egn2in2the2est2shortly2fter
monetry2unionF22he2western2lor2unions2moved2quikly2to2set2up22new2olletive2rgining
system2in2the2est2in2the2imge2of2the2western2systemF22his2ment2estlishing2industryElevel
unions2tht2would2normlly2rgin2with2the2industry2employers2federtionF22sn2the2erly2phses
of2the2trnsition2firms2hd2not2yet2een2privtizedD2howeverD2nd2negotitions2took2ple2etween
4 the2unionsD2whose2key2positions2were2filled2y2westernersD2nd2firm2mngersD2dvised2in2some
ses2y2western2employersF22he2inentives2to2resist2ny2union2wge2demnds2were2lowD2nd
the2unions2unoffiil2ojetives2re2generlly2thought2to2hve2inluded22redution2of2the
inentives2for2esterners2to2move2westF
h e2result2ws22very2rpid2rise2in2wgesD2nd2n2ompnying2fll2in2employmentF
fsed2on2the2qyi2dtD2for2the2ge2group2IV2to2SRD2onsumer2rel2wges2rose2y2VQ72from
IWWH2to2IWWT2@lthough2due2to22rise2through2the2tx2rketsD2fterEtx2wges2rose2y2only2RU7AD
nd2produt2rel2wges2y2IIP7F22ge2onvergene2hd2lmost2esed2y2IWWRD2when2the2firms
hd2een2privtized2nd2employer2resistne2to2wge2inreses2hd2eome2strong2@urner2IWWVAF
imployment2menwhile2fell2y2out2one2third2from2IWVW2to2IWWPD2where2it2stilizedD2whih
ment2tht2employment2rtes2fell2from2VW72to2UQ7F22toEhnging2rtes2were2high2erly2in2the
trnsitionD2ut2y2the2lter2yers2were2not2so2different2from2western2rtes2@runt2IWWWAF22fy2the
l tter2 prt2of2the2IWWHsD2thereforeD2the2trnsition2proess2ppered2to2hve2run2out2of2stemD
lthough2the2piture2differs2onsiderly2y2region2within2the2estF22ge2inequlity2@s2well2s
i n ome2inequlityA2rose2in2the2estD2ut2remined2lower2thn2in2the2westX2the2vrine2of2log
I
wges2rose2from2HFPP2to2HFQR2in2the2estD2ompred2to22stedy2HFSP2in2the2westF
he2government2intervened2with2tive2lor2mrket2poliiesF2elmost2ll2workers2eligile
to2retire2t2SS2under2the2erly2retirement2progrm2in2fore2through2heemer2IWWP2did2so2@out
WHHDHHH2of2the2initil2lor2fore2of2W2millionAF22sn2IWWI2mny2workers2were2on2shortEtimeD2n
involuntry2redution2of2work2hoursD2ut2in2lter2yers2hidden2unemployment2ws2mostly2due2to
individuls2in2puli2trining2progrms2@PQHDHHH2in2IWWTAD2puli2works2jos2@PUVDHHH2in2IWWTA
nd2 erly2 retirementF2 fy2 omprisonD2 registered2 unemployment2 in2 IWWT2 ws2 IDITWDHHHF
@hverständigenrt2 IWWUAF2wenwhileD2in2the2westD2rel2wges2ontinued2to2rise2grdullyF
5 nemploymentD2on2the2other2hndD2delined2to22RFQ72in2IWWI2s22result2of2the2unifition2oomD
P
efore2eginning2n2upwrd2rise2over2most2of2the2rest2of2the2dedeF
he2housing2mrket2is2lso22relevnt2onsidertion2in2moility2deisionsF2usidies2to
rents2in2the2est2were2removed2in2stgesF2usequentlyD2rents2@djusted2for2prtment2size2ut2not
qulityA2were2still2lower2in2the2estD2ut2hve2een2onverging2to2western2levelsF2vimits2on2rent
inreses2for2inument2tennts2men2tht2the2housing2mrket2ts2s22rke2on2moility2in2the
w e s tF22roweverD2this2effet2is2muh2smller2in2the2estX2due2to2the2widespred2neessity2of
renovting2estern2prtments2fter2the2trnsitionD2it2ws2possile2to2rise2rents2moreD2nd2the2rent
dvntge2of2renters2with2long2tenure2is2lower2thn2in2the2westF2@ee2prik2nd2vhmnn2IWWTFA
heory
he2sis2of2the2theory2of2migrtion2hoie2is22omputtion2of2the2present2disounted
vlue2of2expeted2inome2@or2utilityA2in2the2home2ountry2versus2the2destintion2ountryD2tking
2fixed2ost2of2moving2into2ount2@or2possily2lso2persistent2nonEpeuniry2osts2of2living
rodAF2 2 ixpeted2 wges2will2depend2upon2oth2the2wge2onditionl2on2eing2employed2nd
the2 proility2of2eing2employed2in2eh2period2@unemployment2rteAF2forjs2@IWVUA2showsD
sed2 on2the2oy2modelD2tht2the2reltive2inequlities2of2soure2nd2destintion2re2importnt
determinnts2of2who2in2the2soure2ountry2will2most2wnt2to2emigrteF22gonditionl2on2men
wgesD2the2highly2skilled2will2wnt2to2leve2low2inequlity2lotions2for2higher2inequlity
lotionsD2while2the2low2skilled2will2prefer2low2inequlity2lotionsF2
he2utility2of2 eing2in2region2 s2for2individul2 i2my2e2written22222222222222222222
D 22222222222222222222222222222@IA
where2e 2is22funtion2inditing2the2employment2proility2of2the2individulD2nd2depends2upon
is
6 the2regions2unemployment2rte2 2s2well2s2the2individuls2hrteristis2 D2nd2w 2indites
s2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 2 2 is
the2wge2of2the2individul2in2the2region2onditionl2on2employmentD2whih2is2in2turn2determined
y2verge2wges2in2the2region2w D2individul2hrteristis2 D2nd2the2inequlity22in2the2region
s 2 2 2 i
s F22ere2n2individul2to2move2from2region2s2to2region2dD22utility2ost2g 2would2e2inurredX
s 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 isd
D2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 22 @PA
where2h 2is2the2distne2etween2the2two2regionsF2en2individul2will2migrte2from2s2to2d2if2the
sd
utility2differene2m 2is2positiveX
isd
F222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222@QA
h is2 stti2 formultion2 ould2 e2 enhned2 y2 modelling2 expettions2 out2 future
developmentsF22he2most2ovious2predition2of2the2dynmi2formultion2is2tht2young2people2will
e2more2likely2to2emigrteD2s2they2hve22longer2period2in2whih2to2enefit2from2etter2lor
mrket2onditions2in22destintion2regionF2furd2@IWWSA2nd2fuer2@IWWSA2develop2the2ide2of2the
option2vlue2of2witingX2if2the2evolution2of2the2key2vriles2is2unertinD2nd2new2informtion
is2quired2in2every2periodD2it2n2e2optiml2e2wit2nother2period2nd2ressess2the2situtionF
s ing2 the2 individulElevel2 dt2 for2 esternersD2 s2 will2 test2 to2 wht2 extent2 younger
individuls2re2more2likely2to2emigrteD2nd2whetherD2sine2wge2inequlity2is2lower2in2the2estD
highly2skilled2individuls2re2more2likely2to2emigrteF2s2will2lso2determine2whether2those2whose
urrent2jo2mrket2sitution2is2poor2re2more2likely2to2emigrteD22nd2exmine2how2ommuters
nd2 emigrnts2 differF2 2 sn2 order2to2test2whether2migrtion2nd2ommuting2re2sustitutesD2s2will
look2to2see2whether2individuls2living2ner2the2order2re2more2likely2to2ommute2nd2less2likely
to2migrteF2his2prt2of2the2nlysis2will2not2ttempt2to2impute2expeted2gins2from2moving2to
the2westD2nd2hene2will2exmine2only2push2ftorsF22
enlysis2of2the2regionlElevel2migrtion2dt2@for2ll2of2qermnyA2will2then2provide2etter
7 e v i dene2 on2the2uses2of2trends2in2migrtionD2the2distint2effets2of2push2nd2pull2ftors
@espeilly2unemployment2nd2wgesAD2nd2n2ssessment2of2whether2est2to2west2migrtion2flows
re2lower2thn2would2e2expeted2@reltive2to2withinEwest2flowsAF22sndividuls2re2expeted2to
m o ve2 to2 high2 wge2 nd2 low2 unemployment2 regionsF2 2 he2 effet2 of2 soure2 wges2 nd
unemployment2re2miguousD2sine2lthough2low2wges2nd2high2unemployment2will2inrese
the2 desire2 of2 n2 individul2 to2 leveD2 they2 my2 lso2 use2 the2 individul2 to2 e2 liquidity
o nstrinedF2 2elsoD2the2overll2unemployment2rte2of2the2region2my2influene2the2stigm
ssoited2 with2unemploymentD2nd2hene2the2serh2intensity2of2the2unemployedF22pinllyD
unemployment2 durtion2 my2ply22roleD2sine2the2reently2unemployed2my2serh2more2thn
the2 employedD2while2the2long2term2unemployed2my2serh2lessD2or2less2effetivelyD2thn2the
employedD2nd2hene2e2less2likely2to2find22jo2in2nother2regionF
ine2ommuting2is2lso2n2option2for2westerners2seeking2to2hnge2workEple2within
the2westD2ommuting2n2only2explin2reltively2low2estEwest2migrtion2flows2if2esterners2re
m o re2 prepred2 to2 ommute2 thn2 westernersF2 2 hespite2 higher2 estern2 unemployment2 rtesD
employment2 rtes2re2muh2higher2for2estern2thn2western2womenF2his2mens2tht2joint
lotion2 prolems2 mke2 migrtion2 osts2 higher2 for2 esternersD2 nd2 ould2 spur2 ommutingF
g o n verselyD2in2erly2yers2trnsport2infrstruture2ws2worse2in2the2estD2nd2through2t2lest
IWWS2not2fully2integrted2with2the2western2networkD2whih2ould2deter2estEwest2ommutingF2s
will2onsider2men2ommuting2times2nd2distnes2for2esterners2nd2westerners2to2seek2evidene
of2more2ommuting2on2the2prt2of2esternersF
o rking2 hours2re2lower2in2the2west2thn2in2the2estD2whih2redues2the2ttrtion2of
estEwest2migrtion2for2n2inome2mximizer2@ssuming2serh2osts2re2ssoited2with2finding
2 seond2 joAD2 ut2 hs2 n2 miguous2 effet2 on2 2 utility2 mximizerF2 2 s2 will2 ompre2 the
8 explntory2power2of2hourly2nd2weekly2wges2to2ssess2the2effet2of2this2hours2differentilF
revious2impiril2viterture
here2is22lrge2literture2on2the2determinnts2of2migrtionD2using22vriety2of2dt2types
for2 different2 ountriesF2 2 hveri2 nd2 pini2 @IWWTA2 find2 tht2 for2 migrtion2 within2 stlyD
unemployment2nd2wges2re2eqully2importntD2in2the2sense2tht2wht2ppers2to2mtter2is2the
e x peted2 wge2@the2wge2multiplied2y2one2minus2the2unemployment2rteAF22rowever2some
studies2 for2 other2 ountries2 do2 not2 find2 tht2 the2 unemployment2 rte2 in2 the2 soure2 region
enourges2emigrtionD2while2the2wge2differentil2hs2lso2een2found2to2hve2the2opposite2of
Q
the2expeted2signF 22heressin2@IWWRA2uses2migrtion2flows2etween2est2qermn2federl2sttes
in2the2IWVHs2to2nlyze2migrtion2determinntsD2nd2does2find2tht2individuls2tend2to2move2from
high2 to2 low2 unemployment2 regionsD2 s2 well2 s2 from2 low2 to2 high2 wge2 regionsF2 2 forjs
@IWVUDIWWIA2@for2immigrtion2from2rod2to2the2 nited2ttesA2nd2forjsD2fronrs2nd2rejo
@IWWPA2 @for2immigrtion2within2the2 nited2ttesA2find2evidene2to2support2the2oy2model2of
seletion2of2migrntsF
e2smll2set2of2ppers2hs2exmined2estEwest2migrtion2using2the2individulElevel2dt
of2the2qermn2oioEionomi2nel2@qyiAF2furd2@IWWQA2nd2furd2et2lF2@IWWVA2exmine
t h e2determinnts2of2the2intention2to2emigrteD2s2selfEreported2in2IWWIF2furd2@IWWQA2finds
negtive2effets2of2geD2jo2tenure2nd2ivil2servnt2sttusD2nd2positive2effets2of2household
inomeD2rentD2sujetive2proility2of2jo2lossD2nd2hving2fmily2or2friends2in2the2westF22furd
et2lF2@IWWVA2find22 Eshped2reltion2etween2household2inome2nd2migrtion2desireF22hwrze
@IWWTA2omines2informtion2on2migrtion2intentions2in2IWWI2nd2tul2migrtion2from2IWWI2to
IWWR2for22smple2of2individuls2working2in2IWWIF2he2urrent2wge2is2found2to2hve22negtive
9 impt2on2tul2migrtionD2while2wge2growth2hs22positive2imptF2he2presene2of2reltives
in2the2west2nd2disstisftion2with2the2environment2hve2signifint2positive2effetsD2while2the
remining2oeffiients2re2insignifintF2runt2@IWWWA2shows2tht2workers2tking22jo2in2the2west
etween2IWWH2nd2IWWI2hd2medin2wge2gins2of2RP2log2points2@SP7AD2ut2movers2in2lter2yers
gined2t2most2VEW7F22ome2of2the2redution2ws2due2to2the2inrese2in2the2shre2of2individuls
trnsferred2to2the2west2y2their2firmY2these2individuls2experiened2little2wge2ginF
ishkeD2tt2nd2ögele2@IWWRA2use2the2ereitsmrktmonitor2@ewwA2dtset2to2nlyze
ommuting2 from2 ist2 to2 est2 qermnyD2 using2 longitudinl2 dt2 for2 the2 period2 xovemer
IWWHExovemer2IWWIF22hey2oserve2tht2ommuters2re2slightly2younger2nd2muh2more2likely
to2 e2 mle2 thn2 nonEommutersF2 fsed2 on2 sujetive2 questionsD2 the2 uthors2 onlude2 tht
ommuters2intend2to2ommute2for22long2periodF2hey2find2tht2mlesD2the2university2edutedD
R
nd2those2living2in2ist2ferlin2re2signifintly2more2likely2to2serh2for22jo2in2the2westF
he2 proposition2tht2ommuting2n2e22preursor2to2or2sustitute2for2migrtion2hs
reeived2ttention2in2the2litertureX2for2exmpleD2ulter2@IWWRA2proposes2tht22longEterm2deline
in2moility2within2western2qermny2is2explined2y22rise2in2ommuting2filitted2y2flling
trnsport2osts2nd2rendered2more2desirle2y22rise2in2dulEerner2fmiliesF
ht
s2perform2the2prinipl2regionlElevel2nlysis2using2dt2t2the2level2of2the2federl2stteF
i st2 nd2est2ferlin2my2e2used2s2seprte2rossEsetion2units2or2s22single2stteD2nd2s
emphsize2 the2 nlysis2 using2 unified2 ferlinF22he2dt2re2therefore2for2IT2sttes2for2the2yers
S
IWWIEIWWTF 2 2ges2re2for2mnufturingD2nd2re2deflted2seprtely2for2est2nd2west2@the
prie2indies2tke2rents2into2ountAF22urhsing2power2is2mde2omprle2sed2on2uruse
10 @IWWRAF2s2ondut2dditionl2nlysis2using2WU2smller2regions2@umordnungsregionenD2or2y
regionsAD2 for2IWWIEIWWQF22he2y2regions2of2fremenD2rmurg2nd2ferlin2re2defined2to
inlude2the2whole2greter2metropolitn2regionD2unlike2the2federl2sttes2of2fremenD2rmurg2nd
ferlinF
he2 individulElevel2nlysis2uses2the2estern2smple2of2the2qermn2oioEionomi
nel2@qyiA2eginning2with2the2first2wve2drwn2in2tune2IWWHD2just2efore2monetry2unionD
T
nd2 ontinuing2through2IWWUF 22sndividuls2leving2the2est2for2the2west2re2followed2in2the
surveyD2lthough2these2emigrnts2do2hve22higher2thn2verge2ttrition2rte2from2the2surveyF
orkers2re2lso2sked2if2they2re2ommuting2to2the2west2@this2need2not2men2every2dyD2nd
U
inludes2some2ommuters2who2return2home2only2t2weekendsAF 22
h e2 numer2of2est2to2west2migrnts2is2somewht2smll2if2ll2oservtions2with2ny
missing2vlues2in2ll2vriles2of2interest2re2droppedD2so2two2smples2re2usedF2e2lrger2smple
is2used2for2nlysis2of2the2effets2of2si2vrilesF2e2smller2smple2is2used2for2exmintion
of22lrger2rry2of2ovritesF22foth2smples2inlude2oth2the2employed2nd2the2nonEemployedD
nd2over2the2ge2rnge2IVESQD2to2void2retirees2who2would2definitely2not2ommuteF22his2upper
ge2 utEoff2 elimintes2 only2 2 tiny2 numer2 of2 ommuters2 or2 emigrntsF2 he2 lrger2 smple
otherwise2exludes2only2those2with2missing2ommuting2or2migrtion2sttusD2or2edutionF22he
smller2smple2lso2exludes2those2with2missing2informtion2on2lyoff2sttusD2spousl2vrilesD
lor2 fore2 sttusD2 nd2 monthly2 wgeF2 wore2 detils2 on2 ll2 dt2 n2 e2 found2 in2 the2 ht
eppendixF
ionometri2wodels
he2simple2theory2of2equtions2IEQ2suggests2tht2for2the2regionlElevel2nlysis2the
11 following2pnel2model2ould2e2estimted2@using2ll2regions2of2qermnyAX
22 222 2 2222@RA2
2 2222222
where2 w2represents2the2numer2of2individuls2moving2from2 s2to2dD22stnds2for2popultionD2w
for2wgeD2 2for2numer2of2unemployedD2h 2for2vriles2pturing2the2distne2etween2regionsD
sd
nd2 2for2yer2dummiesF2he2speifition2inludes2dummies2for2est2to2west2@i AD2west2to
j2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 sd
est2@i AD2nd2withinEest2flows2@ii AD2nd2their2intertions2with22trendF2he2oeffiients
sd 2 2 2 2 sd
o n 2 these2dummies2indite2how2the2level2nd2hnge2in2the2relevnt2flows2ompre2with2the
omitted2withinEwest2tegoryF222 2represents22rndom2or2fixed2effet2@in2the2ltter2se2 E
sd2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 T2 W
will2not2e2identifiedAF2sn2the2fixed2effets2speifition2it2is2not2pproprite2to2retin2the2soure
nd2destintion2popultionsD2even2though2these2vry2over2timeD2sine2n2importnt2omponent2of
the2vrition2over2time2will2represent2pst2immigrtion2nd2emigrtionF2sn2the2results2presentedD
ferlin2is2treted2s22unified2stte2in2neither2est2nor2westD2nd2the2dummies2if D2fi D2f D
sd 2 sd 2 sd
f 2nd2their2intertion2with22trend2re2lso2inludedD2to2pture2flows2etween2the2est2nd
sd
west2nd2ferlinF22
sing2the2individulElevel2dtD2s2estimte2multinomil2logits2for2the2pooled2pirs2of2yers
from2IWWHEIWWI2to2IWWTEIWWUD2for22smple2of2esterners2who2live2nd2work2in2the2est2in2the
initil2yer2of2the2pirF2s2distinguish2etween2individuls2who2live2nd2work2in2the2est2in2oth
yers2of2the2pirD2individuls2who2move2to2the2westD2nd2individuls2who2egin2ommuting2to
the2west2etween2the2pir2of2yersF2wost2ovrites2refer2to2the2initil2yer2of2the2pirD2nd2the
stndrd2errors2re2djusted2for2the2pooling2of2the2yersF
12 hesriptive2ttistis2from2the2qyi2ht
fefore2fousing2on2the2smple2of2esterners2who2were2living2nd2working2in2the2est2in
the2initil2yer2of22pirD2s2show2how2esterners2move2etween2vrious2sttuses2etween2yersF
le2 I2 shows2 the2 yerEtoEyer2 trnsitions2 for2 esterners2 ged2 IVESQ2 in2 the2 pooled2 yers
I W WHEIWWU2 etween2the2sttuses2of2neither2emigrnt2nor2ommuterD2ommuterD2emigrntD2nd
reverse2ommuterF2e2nonEemigrnt2nonEommuter2lives2nd2works2in2the2est2in22prtiulr2yerF
en2emigrnt2lives2nd2works2in2the2westD22ommuter2lives2in2the2est2nd2works2in2the2westD2nd
2reverse2ommuter2lives2in2the2west2nd2works2in2the2estF2he2first2row2shows2tht2on2verge
over2the2periodD2PFP72of2nonEemigrnt2nonEommuters2egin2ommuting2eh2yerD2while2HFV7
emigrteF2e2very2smll2numer2eome2reverse2ommutersF2he2seond2row2shows2tht2the2vst
mjority2of2emigrnts2remin2in2the2westD2lthough2out2Q72return2home2eh2yer2on2vergeF
fy2ontrstD2the2third2row2revels2tht2eing22ommuter2is22muh2less2stle2stteD2with2PV7
of2 the2ommuters2esing2to2work2in2the2west2eh2yerF22eout2S72of2ommuters2eome
emigrntsD2whih2mens2tht2former2ommuters2represent2IW72of2the2inflows2into2the2stte2of
emigrtionF22hus2eh2yer2one2third2of2ommuters2ese2to2ommuteF22he2fourth2row2shows
tht2UH72of2reverse2ommuters2remin2reverse2ommutersF2hese2results2suggest2tht2ommuting
my2not2e2n2importnt2sustitute2for2emigrtionD2sine2the2stte2of2ommuting2is2muh2more
V
trnsitoryF
he2qyi2dt2onfirm2the2oservtion2of2ishke2et2lF2@IWWRA2using2the2ewwD2tht
the2 group2of2people2who2egin2ommuting2etween2surveys2ut2do2not2report22hnge2of
employer2 in2 tht2 period2 is2 signifintX2 these2 individuls2 shll2 e2 referred2 to2 s2 trnsfer
ommutersF22hese2trnsfer2ommuters2represent2IHI2of2the2QUT2individuls2in2le2I2row2I
who2moved2from2nonEemigrnt2nonEommuter2to2ommuterD2nd2they2hve2higher2trnsfer2rtes
13 k2to2the2stte2of2nonEemigrnt2nonEommuter2thn2ordinry2ommutersD2suggesting2tht2they
my2 hve2een2sent2to2the2west2for2trining2y22firm2with22western2prentF2he2yer2fter
eginning2 to2 ommuteD2 TH72 of2 trnsfer2 ommuters2 return2 to2 the2 sttus2 of2 nonEemigrnt
nonEommuterD2while2QP72of2other2ommuters2do2soF2rnsfer2ommuters2re2nlyzed2seprtely
from2ordinry2ommuters2elowF2emongst2emigrnts2there2re2lso2nineteen2trnsfer2emigrnts
who2move2from2est2to2west2without2hnging2employer2E2seven2of2the2eight2individuls2in2le
I2row2I2who2move2from2eing2nonEemigrnt2nonEommuters2to2reverse2ommuters2re2in2ft
trnsfer2emigrntsD2suggesting2tht2reverse2ommuting2is2the2result2of2short2moves2ner2the2order
tht2re2sed2on2housing2rther2thn2jo2onsidertionsF
he2 rest2 of2 the2 nlysis2 of2the2qyi2dt2will2fous2on2the2deision2to2ese2eing2
nonEemigrnt2 nonEommuter2 @row2 IAY2 s2 will2 not2 ttempt2 to2 nlyze2 the2 deision2 to2 ese
o m muting2or2to2migrte2k2to2the2estD2nor2trnsitions2etween2other2sttusesD2suh2s
i n dividuls2 who2first2ommuteD2then2migrte2@row2Q2olumn2PAX2s2nlyze2their2deision2to
eome22ommuter2onlyF22reneD2the2smple2initilly2nlyzed2@the2lrger2smpleA2is2the2smple
of2the2first2row2of2le2ID2plus2eleven2individuls2who2emigrtedD2ut2whose2ommuting2sttus
is2missing2@nd2who2for2the2purpose2of2le2I2might2e2either2emigrnts2or2reverse2ommutersAF
s2do2not2nlyze2the2return2to2the2west2of2westerners2living2in2the2est2@who2were2not2inluded
in2le2IAF
he2tegory2nmes2for2the2multinomil2logits2refer2to2the2sttus2in2the2seond2yer2of2the
pir2@the2initil2sttus2is2nonEemigrntD2nonEommuterAX2styersD2ommutersD2trnsfer2ommutersD
emigrnts2 nd2trnsfer2emigrntsF2he2trnsfer2emigrnts2re2n2wkwrd2group2E2they2pper
somewht2different2from2the2emigrntsD2nd2will2e2influened2y2the2high2proportion2of2reverse
ommuters2mong2themF22roweverD2they2re2too2smll22group2to2nlyze2seprtelyF22herefore
14 ll2 nlysis2hs2een2performed2either2dropping2them2from2the2smpleD2or2inluding2them2with
the2emigrntsF2wost2ovrites2refer2to2the2initil2yer2of2the2pirF22snformtion2on2lyoffs2refers
to2the2possiility2of22lyoff2eing2reported2s2ourring2etween2the2interviews2of2the2two2yersF
s n formtion2 on2 residene2 @distne2 to2 the2 westD2 ity2 sizeA2 refers2 to2 the2 IWWH2 resideneD2 to
minimize2the2possiility2tht2individuls2hose2their2lotion2to2llow2ommutingD2for2exmpleF
he2mens2of2vriles2used2in2nlysis2of2the2lrger2smple2re2given2in2le2PF22hey
show2tht2oth2types2of2ommuter2re2less2likely2to2e2femle2thn2styersD2nd2tht2emigrnts
nd2ommuters2other2thn2trnsfer2ommuters2re2younger2thn2styersF22RQ72of2emigrnts2re
ged2IVEPSF
righest2 shooling2 ttined2 is2 represented2 y2 four2 tegoriesX2 tertiry2 edution
@universityAD2n2pprentieship2through2the2dul2lssroomGfirm2systemD2votionl2trining2tht
is2not2in2onjuntion2with22firm2@this2in2some2ses2follows2the2pprentieshipD2nd2individuls
in2 this2 tegory2 re2 etter2 pidAD2 nd2 none2 of2 these2 qulifitions2 2 @generl2 shoolingAF
enedotl2 evidene2suggests2tht2one2ommon2type2of2ommuter2or2emigrnt2is2n2individul
who2egins2working2in2the2west2upon2ompletion2of2edution2in2the2estF2ine2the2interviews
re2 onduted2efore2the2end2of2the2demi2yerD2using2edution2in2the2initil2of2the2pir2of
yers2would2give22flse2piture2of2the2edution2level2of2these2emigrnts2nd2ommuters2t2the
point2t2whih2they2egin2working2in2the2westF22hereforeD2the2edution2level2used2is2tht
ttined2in2the2seond2yer2of2the2pirF22le2P2shows2ommuters2nd2emigrnts2nevertheless
inlude2disproportionte2numers2of2those2without2qulifitionD22ut2this2effet2is2muh2stronger
if2edution2in2the2initil2yer2is2usedF2he2trnsfer2emigrnts2inlude22reltively2high2proportion
of2individuls2with2tertiry2edutionF2
foth2types2of2ommuters2nd2trnsfer2emigrnts2were2muh2more2likely2to2live2in2IWWH
15 i n 2 2ureis2@ountyA2tht2hd22order2with2est2ferlin2or2the2rest2of2est2qermnyD2while
differenes2ross2groups2in2the2proportion2living2in22ounty2some2prt2of2whih2is2within2SHkm
of2est2ferlin2or2the2rest2of2est2qermny2re2less2strikingF2U72of2individuls2did2not2hve2the
requisite2informtion2on2their2ounty2to2llow2this2lultionD2nd2these2people2re2represented
with2the2distne2missing2dummy2rther2thn2eing2droppedF2
le2Q2provides2mens2for2these2nd2dditionl2vrilesD2for2the2smller2smpleF22yne
third2 of2 those2 eginning2 to2 ommute2 hd2 experiened2 2 lyoff2 sine2 the2 previous2 yerF
snformtion2for2IWWH2ould2e2missing2if2t2tht2time2the2individul2ws2too2young2to2nswer2the
individul2questionnireD2or2if2the2individul2is2in2the2pnel2in2lter2yers2euse2he2or2she
mrried2into22pnel2fmilyD2nd22dummy2is2inluded2in2the2regressions2to2ontrol2for2thisF
rnsfer2 ommuters2nd2trnsfer2emigrnts2hve2muh2higher2initil2monthly2wges2thn2ny
other2group2@prtly2due2to2the2ft2tht2y2definition2they2ll2hve2nonEzero2wgesAF
egression2esults2from2qyi2ht
he2 first2 multinomil2 regression2 resultsD2 for2 the2 lrger2 smple2 without2 the2 trnsfer
emigrntsD2re2presented2in2le2RF22tndrd2errors2re2orreted2for2the2pooling2of2the2yersD
nd2 exponentited2oeffiients2re2presented2@odds2rtiosAD2long2with2the2tEsttistis2for2the
originl2oeffiientsF2he2referene2group2is2styersF2he2first2regressionD2in2olumns2IEQD2inludes
o n trols2 only2 for2 edution2 nd2 yerF2 his2 reprodues2 the2 results2 of2 the2 tle2 of2 mensX
ommuters2nd2emigrntsD2lthough2not2trnsfer2ommutersD2re2disproportiontely2unskilledF22en
i n dividul2with2only2generl2shooling2is2VP72more2likely2to2e22ommuter2thn22styerD
ompred2to2someone2in2the2omitted2pprentieship2tegoryD22nd2is2twie2s2likely2to2e2n
emigrntF22he2yer2dummies2@whih2refer2to2the2initil2of2the2pir2of2yersA2indite2tht2inflows
16 into2ommuting2fter2the2initil2omitted2yer2of2IWWHEIWWI2were2signifintly2lowerF2wigrtion
levels2in2olumn2Q2follow22similr2time2pttern2to2the2ggregte2dt2of2pigure2IF2he2hypothesis
tht2 the2oeffiients2for2ommuters2nd2emigrnts2re2the2sme2nnot2e2rejeted2in2this
regressionF22roweverD2in2ll2susequent2regressionsD2the2hypothesis2tht2the2oeffiients2of2ny
pir2of2tegories2re2equl2n2e2rejeted2using22likelihood2rtio2testF
he2interprettion2of2the2results2is2not2ffeted2y2onsidering2solute2rther2thn2reltive
proilitiesF22he2verge2predited2proility2of2eing2in2eh2tegory2n2e2omputed2with
ll2 individuls2ssigned2@the2omittedA2pprentieship2edutionD2nd2with2ll2ssigned2generl
shooling2@leving2nonEedutionl2ovrites2t2their2tul2vluesAF2por2ommuters2the2verge
predited2solute2proility2rises2from2IFS72to2PFT72when2edution2is2redued2in2this2wyD
while2for2emigrnts2it2rises2from2HFV72to2IFS7F
sn2the2seond2regressionD2sexD2ge2nd2distne2dummies2re2ddedF2his2hs22lrge2effet
on2 the2 edution2 dummiesX2 onditionl2 on2 geD2 emigrnts2 re2 disproportiontely2 from2 the
highEskilled2university2groupD2with2no2signifint2ptterns2for2ommuters2nd2trnsfer2ommutersF
en2 individul2with22university2degree2is2VQ72more2likely2to2e2n2emigrnt2thn22styerD
ompred2to2the2omitted2pprentieship2tegoryF22sn2terms2of2solute2proilitiesD2rising2the
edution2level2from2pprentieship2to2university2rises2the2verge2predited2proility2from
HFV72 to2IFR7F2he2hnge2in2the2edution2oeffiients2suggests2tht22ommon2emigrnt2or
ommuter2type2is22young2person2who2ommutes2or2migrtes2to2the2west2to2study2further2fter
their2generl2shoolingF2 nreported2results2using2edution2in2the2first2yer2of2the2pir2rther2thn
the2seond2show2somewht2similr2results2for2the2regression2of2olumns2IEQD2ut2these2edution
oeffiients2hnge2little2when2ge2@nd2sex2nd2distneA2re2ddedF22his2onfirms2the
17 2hypothesis2tht2nother2ommon2emigrnt2type2is22person2who2moves2to2the2west2fter2finishing
W
universityF
gommuters2 nd2 espeilly2 emigrnts2 re2 muh2 younger2 thn2 styersD2 ut2 trnsfer
ommuters2 do2not2hve22different2ge2profile2from2styersF2he2ge2effets2re2lrgeX2the
proility2tht2n2individul2is22ommuter2rther2thn22styer2is2SFP2times2higher2for2n2IVEPI
yer2old2@ompred2to2someone2ge2RTESQAD2nd2WFQ2times2higher2in2the2se2of2the2proility
of2migrtionF2por2the2emigrnt2tegory2the2predited2solute2proility2is2PFQ72for2IVEPI2yer
IH
olds2 ompred2to2HFQ72for2RTESQ2yer2oldsF 2he2proility2of2eing22ommuter2or2trnsfer
ommuter2ompred2to2eing22styer2is2only2out2RH72for2women2of2wht2it2is2for2menD2ut
there2is2no2gender2differene2for2emigrntsF2
he2IWWH2distne2oeffiients2provide2the2unsurprising2result2tht2living2in22ounty2on
the2order2rises2the2proility2of2ommuting2or2trnsfer2ommuting2QET2fold2ompred2to2those
more2thn2SHkm2from2the2order2@the2omitted2tegoryAF22roweverD2eing2within2SHkm2of2@ut
not2 onA2the2order2does2not2ffet2the2ommuting2proility2signifintlyF2sf2ommuting2nd
emigrtion2re2sustitutesD2we2would2expet2to2see2tht2res2with2signifintly2higher2ommuting
rtes2hve2lower2emigrtion2rtesF22por2the2region2ordering2est2ferlin2this2is2lerly2not2the
seF22roweverD2residents2on2the2order2with2the2rest2of2est2qermny2re2indeed2less2likely2to
migrteF22his2is2lso2true2for2those2residing2within2SHkm2of2the2rest2of2est2qermnyD2despite
the2ft2tht2these2individuls2re2not2signifintly2more2likely2to2ommuteF2
por2ommuting2to2explin2low2estEwest2migrtion2reltive2to2withinEwest2migrtionD2the
fous2of2the2regionl2nlysis2elowD2esterners2must2e2more2willing2to2undertke2long2trips2to
work2thn2westernersF2sn2IWWQ2nd2IWWS2ll2workers2in2oth2est2nd2west2were2sked2how2fr
they2trvel2to2workF2ultion2of2these2results2for2the2ge2group2IVESR2@using2smple2weightsA
18 shows2 tht2while2esterners2trvel2shorter2distnes2to2work2on2vergeD2the2trip2tkes2them
longerF2sn2IWWS2PH72of2esterners2spent2t2lest2RS2minutes2going2to2workD2while2only2IR72of
westerners2did2soD2however2only2RFS72of2esterners2trveled2t2lest2RH2kmD2ompred2to2V72of
westerners2 @IWWQ2 results2 re2 similrAF2 hese2 results2 proly2 reflet2 the2 inferior2 trnsport
i n f rstruture2in2the2estD2nd2this2infrstruture2is2likely2lso2to2impede2esterners2ility2to
ommute2to2the2westF
he2 regressions2of2le2S2proe2gender2differenes2furtherD2y2dding2intertions
etween2the2femle2dummy2nd2mritl2sttusD2nd2dding22dummy2for2the2presene2of22hild
ged2HEII2nd2its2intertion2with2genderF2he2exponentil2of2the2sums2of2intertion2oeffiients
nd2the2tEsttisti2for2the2sums2re2presented2t2the2ottom2of2the2tleF22he2first2three2olumns
p r esent2 results2for22regression2without2the2trnsfer2emigrntsD2while2olumn2Q92presents2the
m i grtion2 oeffiients2 for2 2 regression2 where2 the2 trnsfer2 emigrnts2 re2 grouped2 with2 the
emigrnts2@the2oeffiients2for2ommuters2nd2trnsfer2ommuters2re2srely2ffetedAF22he
results2show2tht2the2negtive2oeffiient2for2ommuting2on2the2femle2dummy2in2le2R2ws
due2to2the2ft2tht2mrried2women2with2hildren2re2less2likely2to2ommuteD2nd2the2negtive
oeffiient2for2trnsfer2ommuters2ws2due2to22lower2likelihood2of2mrried2women2to2eome
trnsfer2ommutersF2
he2oeffiients2of2olumn2Q92show2tht2the2ddition2of2trnsfer2emigrnts2strengthens2the
tendeny2of2emigrnts2to2e2highly2skilledF2he2result2tht2emigrnts2re2less2likely2to2live2on2the
order2with2the2west2is2wekened22y2the2ddition2of2the2trnsfer2emigrnts2in2olumn2Q9D2ut2this
is2not2surprising2if2mny2of2the2trnsfer2emigrnts2re2mking2short2moves2for2resons2relted2to
housing2rther2thn2their2joF2por2ese2of2interprettionD2susequent2regressions2inlude2neither
the2gender2intertions2nor2the2hild2vrileF
19 s n 2 order2to2exmine2the2effets2of2more2ovrites2nd2to2void2the2inlusion2of2mny
dummy2vriles2for2missing2informtion2on2vrious2vrilesD2susequent2nlysis2is2sed2on
the2smller2smpleF2eppendix22le2I2repets2the2regressions2of2le2R2olumns2QET2with2the
smller2smpleF22he2hnge2in2smple2ffets2the2pttern2of2the2yer2dummies2nd2renders2the
distne2 oeffiients2 for2 emigrnts2 insignifintF2 2 purther2 ovrites2 re2 dded2 to2 this
speifitionD2nd2the2oeffiients2on2the2dditionl2ovrites2only2re2presented2in2le2TF2
h e2 first2dditionl2ovriteD2other2thn2the2dummy2for2the2presene2of22spouseD2is2
d u m my2for2whether2or2not2the2individul2hd2een2working2in2IWWH2E2most2individuls2old
enough2 to2work2ut2not2working2in2IWWH2@with2the2exeption2of2women2on2mternity2leveA
would2hve2hd2only22wek2tthment2to2the2lor2foreD2nd2hene2would2e2expeted2to2e
less2 likely2to2ever2eome2ommuters2of2either2typeF2por2ommuters2of2the2ordinry2type2this
predition2is2orret2@the2oeffiient2is2negtive2nd2signifint2in2the2seond2speifitionAF
gonditionl2on2hving2worked2in2IWWHD2howeverD2one2would2expet2tht2someone2not2working
in2the2initil2yer2of2the2pir2is2likely2to2e2involuntrily2nonEemployedD2nd2tht2suh22person
would2e2more2likely2to2ommute2or2emigrteF22he2results2show2indeed2tht2suh2individuls
r e2lmost2three2times2likely2to2ommute2nd2lmost2twie2s2likely2to2emigrte2ompred2to
those2in2work2@y2definition2trnsfer2ommuters2must2hve2een2working2in2the2initil2of2the2pir
of2yers2nd2the2exponentited2oeffiient2is2therefore2onstrined2to2oneAF22sndividuls2whose
hours2hve2een2involuntrily2redued2@short2timeD2whih2ws2very2ommon2in2IWWI2espeillyA
re2more2thn2twie2s2likely2to2emigrte2s2those2working2full2hoursF22he2effet2on2ommutingD
while2lso2lrgeD2is2signifint2only2t2the2IH72levelF2
he2strongest2preditor2is2the2dummy2for2whether2the2individul2reported2eing2lid2off
e tween2 the2pirs2of2yersX2lidEoff2individuls2re2more2thn2four2times2s2likely2to2egin
20 ommuting2nd2more2thn2twie2s2likely2to2emigrteD2gin2ompred2with2those2who2were
working2in2the2initil2yer2nd2were2not2lid2offF22sn2terms2of2solute2proilitiesD2if2noEone
were2 lid2offD2predited2ommuting2nd2emigrtion2proilities2would2e2IFQ72nd2HFT7
respetivelyD2while2if2ll2were2lid2off2they2would2e2RFW72nd2IFQ72respetivelyF2fy2definition
no2trnsfer2ommuters2were2lid2offD2so2the2exponentited2oeffiient2is2gin2onstrined2to2e
oneF2
en2 individul2with22nonEemployed2spouse2is2more2thn2twie2s2likely2to2eome2
trnsfer2ommuter2s2one2with2n2employed2spouse2@unreported2regressions2indite2this2effet
is2for2mles2onlyAF2he2other2oeffiients2on2the2prtner2informtion2re2not2signifint2t2the2S7
levelD2 lthough2t2the2IH72level2n2individul2whose2prtner2ws2lid2off2is2more2likely2to
emigrte2thn2someone2with22working2spouseF2hummies2for2the2size2of2n2individuls2ity2in
II
IWWH2re2lso2inludedD2nd2in2some2ses2hve2signifint2oeffiientsF 2xone2of2the2results
@ i nluding2 the2unreported2oeffiientsA2re2hnged2muh2y2dding2dummies2for2the2stte2of
residene2in2IWWH2to2the2ovrites2of2the2first2regression2in2le2T2@these2results2re2not
reportedAF
s n 2 olumns2RET2of2le2T2the2responses2to2questions2sked2in2IWWH2out2whether
o l leguesD2reltives2or2friends2hd2moved2to2the2west2in2the2previous2yer2re2dded2to2the
ovrites2of2olumns2IEQF22hese2re2expeted2to2hve22positive2orreltion2with2the2migrtion
proility2nd2possily2the2ommuting2proilityD2either2euse2these2individuls2would
provide2 2network2reduing2the2ost2nd2inresing2the2enefit2of2migrtionD2or2euse2these
individuls2re2similr2to2the2individul2in2the2smpleD2nd2the2vriles2ould2thus2e2orrelted
with2 unoserved2heterogeneity2in2the2error2termF22he2oeffiient2on2the2dummy2for22friend
m o ving2 is2 signifintly2 positive2 for2 the2 proility2 of2 ommutingD2 ut2 otherwise2 in2 the
21 oeffiients2on2these2vriles2re2insignifintF22 nreported2results2inluding2informtion2from
IWWH2out2the2presene2of2reltives2in2the2west2nd2whether2they2sent2money2nd2how2muh2lso
showed2 wek2effetsF22yn2the2other2hndD2the2vrile2inditing2whether22memer2of2the
household2 hd2 moved2 to2 the2 west2 in2 the2 previous2 yer2 hs2 2 lrge2 positive2 effet2 on2 the
proility2of2migrtion2or2trnsfer2ommutingF
e2further2regression2is2run2where2the2edution2dummies2of2olumns2IEQ2in2le2T2re
repled2y2the2individuls2monthly2wge2in2the2initil2of2the2pir2of2yers2@zero2for2those2not
w o r kingAF2 he2oeffiients2on2the2wge2only2re2reported2in2the2upper2pnel2of2le2UF22he
r e sults2 show2 tht2 trnsfer2 ommuters2 nd2 emigrnts2 hve2 higher2 wgesD2 ut2 the2 result2 for
emigrnts2is2only2signifint2when2the2trnsfer2emigrnts2re2inludedF22ine2the2wges2re2in
l e velsD2 the2oeffiient2for2trnsfer2ommuters2implies2tht22hw2IHHH2inrese2in2the2wge
i n reses2the2proility2of2eing22trnsfer2ommuter2y2PT7F22he2results2if2the2edution
oeffiients2 re2lso2inluded2re2shown2in2the2lower2pnelX2the2oeffiient2for2emigrtion
eomes2insignifintD2while2the2negtive2oeffiient2for2ommuters2is2now2signifint2t2the2IH7
levelF2 goeffiients2 re2 even2 less2 signifint2 if2 hourly2 wges2 re2 used2 @the2 results2 of2 these
regressionsD2whih2entil22redution2in2smple2sizeD2re2not2reportedAF
ogether2 the2oeffiients2neither2seem2to2support22oy2model2interprettion2@positive
o e ffiients2would2e2expeted2in2the2first2rowAD2nor2n2interprettion2of2the2effets2of2eing
overpid2 or2 underpid2 onditionl2 on2 ones2 hrteristis2 @negtive2 oeffiients2 would2 e
expeted2in2the2seond2rowAF2he2interprettion2of2the2wge2my2e2osured2y2young2people
who2egin2working2in2the2west2fter2n2initilly2low2wge2s2n2pprentie2or2on22prtEtime2jo
@if2 this2is2not2ptured2y2the2ge2dummiesAF2st2my2e2seen2tht2these2wge2results2t2the
individul2 level2will2not2e2useful2in2prediting2how2emigrtion2will2hnge2s2the2ggregte
22 wge2level2in2the2est2pprohes2tht2of2the2westX2sine2where2signifint2the2effet2of2the2wge
is2positiveD2this2would2pper2to2suggest2tht2wge2onvergene2will2inrese2emigrtionF2his
question2will2now2e2ddressed2with2the2regionl2dtD2where2the2timeEseries2omponent2of2wge
hnges2will2e2reltively2more2importnt2thn2in2the2individulElevel2dtF
esults2from2egionl2ht
he2 first2olumn2of2eppendix2le2P2shows2the2mens2of2the2smple2of2federl2stte
pirsF22wore2informtiveD2howeverD2is2le2VD2whih2shows2some2mens2ross2sttes2for2IWWI
nd2IWWTF2he2@grossA2emigrtion2per2popultion2rte2for2western2sttes2ws2stedy2from2IWWI
to2IWWT2t2IFU72per2yerD2while2the2emigrtion2rte2from2estern2sttes2fell2from2PFH72to2IFR7
per2yerF2smmigrtion2to2the2west2fell2slightly2over2the2periodD2while2immigrtion2to2the2est2rose
gretly2from2HFV72to2IFR7F22ferlins2pttern2is2distintiveD2with22smll2rise2in2immigrtion2nd
2lrge2rise2in2emigrtion2over2the2periodF
sn2ddition2to2using2the2distnes2etween2the2iggest2ity2in2eh2stteD2s2use2dummies
for2whether2the2sttes2re2neighorsD2nd2whether2they2re2superneighorsX2tht2isD2whether2they
re2neighors2nd2one2of2them2is22ityEstte2@fremenD2rmurg2or2ferlinAF22yther2vriles2used
re2the2hourly2nd2weekly2wge2rtesF2he2mens2reflet2the2onvergene2etween2est2nd2westD
s2well2s2the2smller2gp2in2weekly2wges2due2to2higher2hours2in2the2estF22 nemployment2rtes
rise2in2oth2est2nd2west2E2the2registered2unemployed2sttisti2underestimtes2unemployment2in
the2 estD2 howeverD2 where2 trining2 progrms2 nd2 puli2 works2 jos2 oupy2 mny2 peopleF
hortEtime2work2ws2very2high2in2the2est2in2IWWID2while2estern2vnies2were2prtiulrly2low
in2IWWIF
23 le2W2presents2the2results2of2rndom2effets2regressions2for2the2IWWIEIWWT2periodF22he
ovrites2 inlude2soure2nd2destintion2popultionsD2whether2soure2or2destintion2ws2
ityEstteD2nd2the2stte2proximity2vriles2@inluding22qudrti2in2distneAD2nd2yer2dummiesD
ut2their2oeffiients2re2not2reportedF2elso2inluded2re2the2ferlin2dummies2nd2their2intertion
with22trendX2these2oeffiients2re2lso2not2reportedF2sn2olumn2I22speifition2without2wge
or2unemployment2informtion2is2presentedF22he2insignifint2oeffiient2on2the2estEwest2dummy
indites2 tht2est2to2west2flows2in2IWWI2were2only2wht2would2hve2een2expeted2given
geogrphy2nd2popultionF22he2oeffiient2on2its2intertion2with22trendD2defined2to2equl2zero
in2IWWID2shows2tht22signifint2downwrd2trend2of2out2SFS72per2yer2followedF22est2to2est
EFVW
flows2 were2RI72@e A2of2wht2would2hve2een2expeted2in2IWWID2ut2rose2susequently2y
EFQW
slightly2 more2thn2IP72per2yerF22ithinEest2flows2were2initilly2TV72@e A2of2withinEwest
flowsD2ut2then2rose2t2out2TFR72per2yerF
sn2olumn2P2s2inlude2the2destintion2nd2soure2hourly2wgesF2he2oeffiients2on2eh
s2well2s2the2differene2in2the2oeffiients2@shown2in2the2ottom2pnelA2hve2the2expeted2signsF
he2oeffiient2differene2@ottom2pnelA2indites2tht22I72higher2wge2in2the2destintion2stte
ompred2to2the2soure2stte2inreses2flows2y2QFT7F22
sn2olumn2Q2s2dd2destintion2nd2soure2unemployment2to2the2ovritesF2he2oeffiient
on2destintion2unemployment2is2signifintly2negtive2@inditing2tht22I72rise2in2the2numer
of2 destintion2 unemployed2 would2 derese2 flows2 y2 HFQ7AF2 he2 oeffiient2 on2 soure
unemployment2 isD2howeverD2smll2nd2insignifintF2qiven2the2individulElevel2results2tht2the
reently2lidEoff2nd2the2nonEemployed2re2more2likely2to2emigrteD2neither2the2onsidertion2of
liquidity2onstrintsD2nor2of2possile2low2serh2intensity2of2the2longEterm2unemployedD2nor2of
d i fferentil2 stigm2 effets2 seems2 2 plusile2 explntion2 for2 2 nonEpositive2 oeffiientF2 sn
24 unreported2 regressions2for2the2west2only2or2exluding2the2yer2IWWID2the2oeffiient2is2indeed
positiveF22he2ottom2pnel2indites2tht2the2differene2in2the2soure2nd2destintion2oeffiients
IP
is2signifintly2negtiveD2s2expetedF
sn2olumn2R2s2dd2destintion2nd2soure2shortEtime2workersD2in2olumn2S2s2sustitute2the
weekly2wge2for2the2hourly2wgeD2while2in2olumn2T2s2dd2destintion2nd2soure2vniesF2he
signs2on2the2shortEtime2vrile2oeffiients2re2s2expetedD2nd2the2mgnitudes2seem2resonle
ompred2to2the2mgnitude2of2the2destintion2unemployment2oeffiientF22gontrolling2for2weekly
rther2thn2hourly2wge2wekens2the2shortEtime2oeffiientsD2sine2the2redued2hours2ptured2y
the2 shortEtime2 vriles2 re2 refleted2 in2 the2 weekly2 wgeF2 2 he2 oeffiient2 on2 destintion
vnies2is2signifintly2negtiveD2the2opposite2of2the2expeted2signF22his2ould2e2due2to2the
high2orreltion2etween2unemployment2nd2vnies2@EHFUAF
he2wge2nd2unemployment2informtion2together2re2suffiient2to2explin2the2downwrd
trend2in2est2to2west2migrtionD2sine2the2oeffiient2on2the2est2to2west2trend2turns2from2negtive
nd2signifint2in2the2first2olumnD2to2positive2in2susequent2olumnsF22hese2ovrites2do2not
explin2the2level2of2est2to2west2migrtion2ompred2to2withinEwest2migrtionD2howeverD2s2the
s i gnifintly2negtive2oeffiients2in2the2first2row2show2tht2the2IWWI2level2of2migrtion2ws
EFSP
lower2 thn2would2hve2een2expetedD2y2t2lest2RI72@IEe AD2given2the2vlues2of2ll2the
ovritesF
he2low2IWWI2level2of2west2to2est2nd2withinEest2migrtion2@rows2Q2nd2SA2is2explined
y2the2ovrites2s2long2s2hourly2nd2not2weekly2wges2re2inludedF2wost2of2the2rise2in2the
west2to2est2migrtion2@row2RA2is2explined2y2the2ovritesX2the2remining2trend2is2signifint
if2weekly2wges2re2usedD2or2if2vnies2re2inludedF22hether2the2signifint2rise2in2withinE
est2flows2oserved2in2olumn2I2row2T2n2e2explined2y2the2ovrites2is2likewise2sensitive
25 to2the2speifitionF
pixed2effets2my2e2employed2to2further2investigte2whether2the2ovrites2explin2the
t r ends2 in2migrtionD2ut2here2of2ourse2the2verge2levels2nnot2e2investigtedF22le2IH
presents2fixed2effets2resultsX2ll2timeEvrying2ovrites2from2le2W2re2inludedD2exept2soure
nd2destintion2popultionF22he2first2olumn2ontins2no2ontrols2for2wges2or2unemployment
onditionsF22he2oeffiient2on2the2withinEest2trend2term2is2smller2thn2tht2in2the2orresponding
olumn2 in2le2WF2he2speifitions2of2olumns2PET2lso2mirror2those2of2le2WD2nd2the
oeffiients2on2the2vriles2dded2in2these2olumns2re2similr2to2those2in2le2WF22
sn2 ll2the2speifitions2inluding2oth2hourly2wge2nd2unemployment2informtion
@olumns2QDR2nd2TAD2the2trend2oeffiients2re2insignifintF2eekly2wgesD2howeverD2re2not
suessful2in2explining2the2withinEest2rise2in2migrtionD2nd2overEexplin2the2fll2in2est2to2west
migrtionF22he2differene2etween2the2fixed2nd2rndom2effets2results2is2tht2the2fixed2effets
speifition2more2suessfully2explins2the2west2to2est2trend2nd2the2withinEest2trendF2por2the
purposes2of2nlyzing2the2trendsD2fixed2effets2is2the2preferred2speifitionD2so2the2results2of
le2IH2indite2tht2ll2trends2n2e2stisftorily2explined2y2the2ovritesF
h e2 nlysis2of2les2W2nd2IH2hs2een2repeted2treting2ist2nd2est2ferlin2s
seprte2 sttesD2elonging2to2the2est2nd2west2respetively2@these2results2re2not2reportedAF
gertin2oeffiients2on2the2eonomi2vriles2re2sensitive2to2this2hngeD2in2prtiulr2to2not
inluding2 the2ferlin2dummiesF2he2onlusion2tht2trends2in2migrtion2my2e2explined2@nd
tht2the2IWWI2level2of2est2to2west2migrtion2ppers2lowA2remins2unhngedD2howeverF
e2 possile2onern2out2the2stteElevel2nlysis2is2tht2the2unemployment2nd2wge
vriles2represent2yerly2vergesD2nd2ould2thus2e2endogenousF2he2effet2of2the2endogeneity
is2to2is2the2oeffiients2towrds2zeroD2nd2mke2the2inlusion2of2these2vriles2less2likely2to
26 explin2regionl2differenes2in2migrtion2flowsF2he2onlusion2tht2trends2in2migrtion2etween
est2nd2west2hve2een2explined2should2therefore2e2unffetedF
h e2 insignifint2oeffiient2in2row2I2olumn2I2in2le2W2seems2implusileX2this
oeffiient2sys2tht2IWWI2est2to2west2flows2were2no2different2from2those2tht2would2hve2een
expeted2sed2on2popultion2nd2distneF22his2oeffiientD2nd2hene2presumly2the2negtive
signifint2oeffiients2of2the2rest2of2the2rowD2is2the2result2of2ggregtionF2imilr2nlysis2with
FRTT
the2dt2for2the2smller2y2regions2indites2tht2in2IWWI2est2to2west2flows2were2SW72@e A
ove2wht2would2hve2een2expeted2sed2on2popultion2nd2distne2@mens2of2this2dt2re
presented2in2eppendix2le2P2olumn2PD2while2the2regression2results2re2presented2in2eppendix
le2QAF22hen2these2regions2re2ggregted2up2to2the2stte2level2@with2enlrged2ityEsttesAD2they
replite2the2le2W2olumn2I2result2tht2flows2re2not2higher2thn2would2hve2een2expetedD
showing2tht2this2result2is2due2to2ggregtion2nd2is2not2relted2to2lrge2flows2to2nd2from2ityE
sttesF2@xeither2is2it2due2to2the2vilility2of2more2yers2of2stte2dtFA2 nfortuntelyD2the2wge
nd2 unemployment2 informtion2 is2 inomplete2for2the2y2regionsD2so2the2nlysis2of2the2lter
IQ
olumns2of2le2W2nnot2e2replited2with2these2dtF
gonlusions
h e2 qyi2dt2hve2shown2firstly2tht2ommuting2from2est2to2west2is2something
individuls2undertke2on22more2temporry2sis2thn2emigrtion2to2the2westD2nd2is2often
undertken2without22hnge2of2employerF22eout2PH72of2individuls2who2move2to2the2west2first
ommutedF22e2ommon2type2of2ommuter2or2emigrnt2is22young2person2who2is2pursuing2his2or
her2studies2in2the2westF2enother2ommon2type2of2emigrnt2is22young2person2who2moves2to2the
west2fter2finishing2tertiry2edution2in2the2estF2imigrnts2re2muh2younger2thn2styersD2nd
27 o n ditionl2on2ge2re2more2skilledD2s2predited2y2the2oy2model2of2migrtion2seletionF
g o mmuters2re2slightly2older2thn2emigrntsD2nd2onditionl2on2ge2hve2skills2less2different
from2styersD2whih2suggests2tht2moving2osts2deter2the2lessEskilled2from2movingF22his2youth
nd2 rinEdrin2 suggests2 tht2 emigrtion2 from2 the2 est2 ould2 e2 2 legitimte2 onern2 for
poliyEmkers2nxious2out2the2eonomi2viility2of2the2estern2regionF22enother2ommon2type
of2emigrnt2or2ommuter2is2someone2who2hd2experiened2lor2mrket2diffiulties2in2the2estF
yne2third2of2those2eginning2to2ommute2hd2experiened22lyoffF
gommuters2not2surprisingly2re2muh2more2likely2to2live2in2regions2ordering2the2westF
sndividuls2living2on2the2order2with2est2ferlin2re2not2less2likely2to2emigrteD2ut2individuls
l i v ing2 on2the2order2with2the2rest2of2the2west2re2signifintly2less2likely2to2emigrteF22his
i n dites2 tht2 there2 is2 some2 sustitution2 etween2 ommuting2 nd2 migrtionD2 lthough2 the
temporry2nture2of2ommutingD2the2sene2of2sustitution2in2the2ferlin2reD2nd2the2possiility
of2using2ommuting2s22springord2for2emigrtion2suggest2tht2emigrtion2rtes2hve2not2een
gretly2 lowered2y2the2possiility2of2ommutingF22elsoD2there2is2no2evidene2to2support2the
hypothesis2tht2esterners2re2more2willing2to2ommute2thn2westernersF
sing2the2stteElevel2dtD2ville2from2IWWIEIWWTD2s2m2le2to2explin2the2downwrd
trend2 in2 est2 to2 west2 migrtionD2 reltive2 to2 the2 withinEwest2 trendD2 using2 hourly2 wge2 nd
unemployment2informtionF22ge2onvergene2is2the2most2importnt2ftorF2s2m2lso2le2to
explin2westEest2nd2withinEest2trendsF2eekly2wges2re2not2s2suessful2in2explining2trends
s2hourly2wgesF22elthough2the2stteElevel2nlysis2suggests2tht2the2level2of2est2to2west2flows
is2lower2thn2would2e2predited2y2the2ovritesD2the2nlysis2of2smller2regions2shows2tht2this
is2not2the2seF22he2ontinued2inhittion2of2ist2qermny2is2thus2no2more2puzzling2thn2the
ontinued2inhittion2of2less2prosperous2regions2of2est2qermnyF
28 ht2eppendix
he2IHH72smple2of2the2qyi2is2usedD2long2with2ounty2dummies2whih2re2ville
upon2 speil2greement2with2the2qermn2snstitute2for2ionomi2eserh2@hsAF2s2exploit
informtion2 out2 hnging2 jos2 nd2 the2reported2reson2for2the2hnge2to2onstrut22dummy
i n d iting2 if2 n2 individul2 ws2 lid2 off2 @or2 fired2 or2 experiened2 2 firm2 losureA2 etween
interviewsF2e2lidEoff2individul2need2not2neessrily2hve2een2working2t2the2time2of2the2first
interviewF2por2IWWIEIWWS2s2use2the2informtion2in2the2lor2fore2sttus2question2to2determine
short2 time2sttus2@in2IWWH2shortEtime2hd2not2yet2een2introduedAF2por2IWWT2nd2IWWUD2when
shortEtime2ws2no2longer2n2option2for2the2lor2fore2sttus2questionD2s2set2the2dummy2to2zeroD
sine2lredy2y2IWWS2the2proportion2of2workers2on2shortEtime2ws2very2lowF2sf2n2individuls
edution2informtion2ws2missing2for2the2initil2yer2of2the2pir2of2yers2onsideredD2s2drop2the
individulD2ut2if2edution2from2the2seond2yer2ws2missingD2s2ssign2the2vlue2from2the2first
yerD2 to2 void2 disproportiontely2 losing2 emigrntsF2 his2 ffeted2 only2 2 smll2 numer2 of
individulsD2 most2of2whom2hd2degrees2eyond2generl2shoolingF2o2onstrut2the2spousl
vriles2s2link2the2individul2to2the2person2identified2s2eing2lerly2or2proly2the2prtnerF
o 2rete2the2vrile2household2memer2emigrted2in2previous2yer2s2omined2the2IWWH
q u estion2 sking2if22household2memer2hd2emigrted2in2the2previous2yer2with2informtion
onstruted2for2lter2yers2y2following2movement2of2individuls2in2nd2out2of2households2nd
the2westF
he2 dt2 on2 migrtion2 flows2 t2 the2 federl2 stte2 level2 ome2 from2 the2 ttistishes
fundesmt2pulition2phserie2I2eihe2IF2ell2individuls2in2qermny2must2e2registered2with
the2polieD2nd2these2dt2ggregte2the2lolElevel2informtion2from2the2old2nd2new2ddresses
provided2 y2n2individul2on2movingF2he2wge2nd2unemployment2vriles2ome2from2the
ttistishes2thruhF22he2mnufturing2wge2vrile2is2sed2on22firm2survey2nd2mesures
wges2of2workers2outside2the2rgining2system2s2well2s2those2within2itF22ges2for2industry
nd2 servies2together2were2not2used2s2this2dt2is2missing2for2ist2ferlin2in2IWWIF2ges2for
fremen2in2IWWP2were2not2villeF2prom2IWWU2dt2on2ist2nd2est2ferlin2seprtely2re2no
longer2villeF2he2soure2for2distnes2etween2sttes2lrgest2ities2is2the2tle2in2the2ndE
wxlly2mp2of2qermnyD2exept2for2distnes2to2wgdeurg2nd2otsdmD2whih2were2otined
from2wwwFreiserouteFdeGeuropdeFhtmF2he2ity2used2for2xordrheinEestflen2is2hüsseldorfF
he2 dt2 on2 migrtion2 flowsD2 distnes2 nd2 popultion2 t2 the2 regionl
@umordnungsregionA2 level2 re2 unpulished2 dt2 from2 the2 fundesmt2 für2 fuwesen2 und
umordnungF2hey2re2ville2only2for2IWWIEIWWQD2due2to22redefinition2of2regionsF
he2 qh2 figures2 in2 the2 introdution2 ome2 from2 the2 fundesnk2 we2 pge
wwwFundesnkFdeD2while2popultion2nd2ernings2rtio2figures2ome2from2the2ttistishes
fundesmt2we2pge2wwwFsttistikEundFdeGpresseGdeutshGpmGpUQTTHRPFhtmF
29 filiogrphy
fuerD2 homsF2 IWWSF2 he2 wigrtion2 heision2 with2 nertin2 gostsF2 wünhener
irtshftwissenshftlihe2feiträge2xoF2WSEPSD2 niversity2of2wunihF
fentivogliD2ghir2nd2trizio2gnoF2IWWWF2egionl2hisprities2nd2vour2woilityX2he
iuroEII2versus2the2 eF2vour2IQ2@QA2ppFUQUEUTHF
flnhrdD2 ylivierD2nd2vwrene2utzF2IWWPF2egionl2ivolutionsF2 frookings2pers2on
ionomi2etivity2volume2I2ppF2IEUSF
f o rjsD2qeorgeF2IWVUF2elfEeletion2nd2the2irnings2of2smmigrntsF2 emerin2ionomi
eview2ppFSQIESSQF
forjsD2qeorgeF2IWWIF2smmigrtion2nd2elfEeletionF2sn2tohn2eowd2nd2ihrd2preemn
edsF2smmigrtionD2rde2nd2the2vor2wrketD2 niversity2of2ghigo2ressF
forjsD2qeorgeD2tephen2fronrs2nd2tephen2rejoF2IWWPF2elfEeletion2nd2snternl2wigrtion
in2the2 nited2ttesF2tournl2of2 rn2ionomis2ppFISWEIVSF
furdD2wihelF2IWWQF2he2heterminnts2of2istEest2qermn2wigrtion2E2ome2pirst2esultsF
iuropen2ionomi2eview2ppFRSPERTIF
f u rdD2wihelF2IWWSF2wigrtion2nd2the2yption2lue2of2itingF2 ionomi2nd2oil
eview2ppFIEIWF
furdD2wihelD2olfgng2rärdleD2wrlene2wüller2nd2exel2erwtzF2IWWVF2emiprmetri
enlysis2 of2qermn2istEest2wigrtion2sntentionsX2pts2nd2heoryF2 tournl2of
epplied2ionometris22olF2IQ2ppFSPSESRIF
hveriD2prneso2nd2irdo2piniF2IWWTF2here2ho2wigrnts2qoc2iskEeversionD2woility
g o sts2 nd2the2votion2ghoie2of22wigrntsF22genter2for2iuropen2oliy2eserh
hisussion2per2ISRHF
heressinD2 törgF2IWWRF2snternl2wigrtion2in2est2qermny2nd2smplitions2for2istEest
lry2gonvergeneF2eltwirtshftlihes2erhiv2ppFPQIEPSUF
heressinD2 törg2 nd2 entonio2 ptásF2 IWWSF2 egionl2 vor2 wrket2 hynmis2 in2 iuropeF
iuropen2ionomi2eview2QW2@WA2ppF2ITPUEITSSF
prikD2tohim2nd2rerert2vhmnnF2IWWTF2ohnungsmieten2in2heutshlnd2im2thr2IWWSF
heutshes2snstitut2für2irtshftsforshung2oheneriht22ppFQUWEQVTF
runtD2tenniferF2IWWWF2ostE nifition2ge2qrowth2in2ist2qermnyF2xfi2orking2per
TVUVF
30 tkmnD2 ihrd2nd2vvs2vouriF2IWWPF2egionl2wigrtion2in2fritinX2en2enlysis2of
qross2plows2 sing2xr2gentrl2egister2htF2ionomi2tournl2olF2QW@QA2ppF2PUPE
PVUF
ulterD2 prnkF2 IWWRF2 endeln2 sttt2 wigrtionc2 hie2 hl2 und2 tilität2 von
ohnortEereitsortEuomintionenF2eitshrift2für2oziologie2ppFRTHERUTF
u r useD2eterF2IWWRF2ermut2im2ohlstndX2fetroffenheit2und2polgenF2heutshes2snstitut2für
irtshftsforshung2hisussion2per2VVF
vundorgD2erF2IWWIF2heterminnts2of2wigrtion2in2the2xordi2vor2wrketF2 ndinvin
tournl2of2ionomis2ppF2QTQEQUSF
ishkeD2 törnEteffenD2wtthis2tt2nd2tefn2ögeleF2IWWRF2ereitslosigkeitD2vöhne2oder
eiterildungX2rum2pendeln2ystdeutshe2in2den2estenc2sn2reinz2uönig2nd2iktor
teiner2edsF2ereitsmrktdynmik2und2 nternehmensentwiklung2in2ystdeutshlnd2fden
fdenX2xomos2erlgF
issridesD2ghristopher2nd2tonthn2dsworthF2IWVWF2 nemployment2nd2the2snterEregionl
woility2of2vourF2ionomi2tournl2WW2@QWUA2ppF2UQWEUSSF
hverständigenrt2 zur2 feguthtung2 der2 gesmtwirtshftlihen2 intwiklungF2 @IWWUAF
thresguthten2 IWWUGV2 des2 hverständigenrtes2 zur2 feguthtung2 des
gesmtwirtshftlihen2intwiklungD2heutsher2fundestgD2hrukshe2IQGWHWHF
hwrzeD2tohnnesF2IWWTF2feeinflußt2ds2vohngefälle2zwishen2ystE2und2estdeutshlnd2ds
wigrtionsverhlten2der2ystdeutshenc2ellgemeines2ttistishes2erhiv2ppFSHETVF
urnerD2vowellF2IWWVF2pighting2for2rtnershipX2vor2nd2olitis2in2 nified2qermny2sthX
gornell2 niversity2ressF
gnerD2qertF2IWWPF2ereitslosigkeitD2ewnderung2und2endeln2von2ereitskräften2der2neuen
fundesländerF2oziler2portshritt2reft2R2ppF2VREVWF
gnerD2qertF2IWWVF2wigrtion2fefore2nd2efter2 nifitionX2impiril2ividene2nd2oliy
smplitions2for2qermnyF2sn2sl2uong2nd2uwng2uk2uim2edsF2oliy2riorities2for
the2 nified2uoren2ionomy2eoulX2snstitute2for2qlol2ionomisF
gnerD2qertD2ihrd2furkhuser2nd2priederike2fehringerF2IWWQF2he2inglish2vnguge
u li2 se2 pile2 of2 the2 qermn2 oioEionomi2 nel2 tudyF2 tournl2 of2 rumn
esoures2PV2@PA2ppFRPWERQQF
31 indnotes
1.xumers2in2this2prgrph2re2omputed2from2the2qyi2dtD2using2weights2in2the2se
of2est2qermny2where2foreigners2re2oversmpledF
2.tndrdized2unemployment2rte2omputed2y2the2fureu2of2vor2ttistis2in2the2 nited
ttesF
3.por2unemployment2see2vundorg2@IWWIA2for2wedenD2issrides2nd2dsworth2@IWVWA2for
fritinD2nd2fentivogli2nd2gno2@IWWWA2for2the2iuroEzoneF2por2wges2see2tkmn2nd
vouri2@IWWPAF
4.ee2lso2gner2@IWWPA2nd2gner2@IWWVA2for2desriptive2sttistis2nd2nlysis2of
ommuting2nd2migrtion2using2the2qyi.
5.wigrtion2dt2for2the2fourth2qurter2of2IWWH2re2villeD2lthough2the2olletion2method
is2not2fully2omprle2to2tht2of2lter2yersF2snformtion2on2wge2rtes2re2not2ville2for
most2sttes2in2the2est2in2IWWHD2howeverD2exept2from2the2qyi2dtD2where2the2smple2size
y2stte2is2somewht2smllF
6.ee2gnerD2furkhuser2nd2fehringer2@IWWQA2for22omplete2desription2of2the2dtF
7.roweverD2the2weekly2nd2dily2ommuters2nnot2e2distinguished2in2every2yerF2sn2the
ville2yersD2TU72of2ommuters2were2dily2ommutersF
8.yne2reson2tht2the2emigrtion2rte2of2HFV72in2row2I2is2lower2thn2in2the2ggregte
sttistis2shown2in2pigure2I2is2tht2it2does2not2inlude2these2ommuters2who2eome
emigrntsF2heir2ddition2oosts2the2verge2emigrtion2rte2to2I72per2yerF22elsoD2the
ggregte2sttistis2inlude2some2westerners2returning2homeD2s2well2s2refugees2nd
eussiedler2@ethni2qermn2immigrntsA2initilly2loted2in2the2est2y2the2governmentD2who
prefer2to2live2in2the2west2one2they2hve22free2hoieF
9.ome2university2students2my2hve2gone2to2the2west2somewht2involuntrily2if2they2did
not2otin22ple2t22university2lose2to2homeF
10.sndividuls2whose2militry2servie2hppened2to2e2in2the2west2re2not2reorded2s
ommuters2or2emigrntsF
11.he2ities2with2more2thn2SHHDHHH2inhitnts2re2ist2ferlinD2hresden2nd2veipzigF
12.2sf2the2ggregte2unemployment2to2popultion2rtio2y2stte2is2dded2to2the2ovrites2in
the2qyi2nlysisD2its2oeffiients2re2insignifintD2nd2for2emigrnts2the2sign2is2negtiveF
he2oeffiients2on2the2intertion2of2the2stte2unemployment2rte2with2lyoff2nd2nonE
employment2inditors2re2lso2insignifint2for2emigrntsF2he2nonEemployed2in2high
unemployment2sttes2re2signifintly2more2likely2to2ommuteD2howeverF
32 13.2sn2le2IH2the2ovrites2were2le2to2explin22fll2of2in2est2to2west2flows2of2U72per
yerD2or2RP7D2slightly2less2thn2the2y2surplus2migrtion2of2SW7F22st2therefore2seems
likely2tht2onditioning2on2wges2nd2unemployment2in2the2y2dt2would2result2in2n
insignifint2oeffiient2on2the2est2to2west2dummyF
33 Table 1: Matrix of changes in commuting and migration status, GSOEP data (Number of observations in parentheses.)
Year 1 status Year 0 status Non−emigrant. Emigrant Commuter Reverse non−commuter commuter
Non−emigrant. 96.9% 0.8% 2.2% 0.05% 100% non−commuter (16359) (138) (376) (8) (16881)
Emigrant 2.7% 96.6% 0.3% 0.4% 100% (19) (682) (2) (3) (706)
Commuter 28.1% 4.8% 67.1% 0% 100% (193) (33) (461) (0) (687)
Reverse commuter 15.0% 15.0% 0% 70.0% 100% (3) (3) (0) (14) (20)
90.6% 4.7% 4.6% 0.1% 100% (16574) (856) (839) (25) (18294)
Notes: Data are for easterners age 18−53, for years 1990−1997. A non−emigrant non−commuter lives and works in the east. An emigrant lives and works in the west. A commuter lives in the east and works in the west. A reverse commuter lives in the west and commutes to the east. Table 2: Means of Larger GSOEP Sample
All Stayers Commuters Transfer Emigrants Transfer commuters emigrants Sex (female=1) 0.52 0.52 0.32 0.30 0.59 0.42 Spouse 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.64 0.49 0.42 Spouse*sex 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.13 0.28 0.16 Child 0−11 0.43 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.44 0.37 Child*sex 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.12 0.30 0.16 Age 18−21 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.11 0.23 0.21 Age 22−25 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.20 0.16 Age 26−35 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.34 0.33 0.32 Age 36−45 0.30 0.31 0.27 0.29 0.18 0.21 Age 46−53 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.15 0.07 0.11 General schooling 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.10 0.16 0.11 University 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.26 Vocational training 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.17 0.11 Apprenticeship 0.58 0.59 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.53 Border with West Berlin 0.09 0.08 0.25 0.28 0.12 0.16 1990 Border with rest of 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.21 West Germany 1990 Within 50km of West 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.02 0 Berlin 1990 Within 50km rest of 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.13 0.17 0.11 West Germany 1990 Distance 1990 missing 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.16 Observations 16892 16359 275 101 138 19
Notes:
Sample is that of row 1 of Table 1, plus 11 individuals who were non−commuters, then emigrated but did not indicate their later commuter status. Education refers to the second year of the pair considered. Data are for 1990−1997. Table 3: Means of Smaller GSOEP Sample Transfer Transfer All Stayers Commuters Emigrants commuters emigrants Sex (female=1) 0.52 0.53 0.30 0.31 0.60 0.41 Spouse 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.63 0.52 0.47 Spouse*sex 0.37 0.38 0.15 0.13 0.30 0.18 Child age 0−11 0.43 0.43 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.35 Child age 0−11*sex 0.23 0.24 0.11 0.12 0.32 0.12 Age 18−21 0.09 0.09 0.20 0.10 0.22 0.24 Age 22−25 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.12 Age 26−35 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.34 0.34 0.29 Age 36−45 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.27 0.22 0.24 Age 46−53 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.17 0.05 0.12 General schooling 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.09 0.17 0.06 University 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.29 Vocational training 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.12 Apprenticeship 0.59 0.59 0.52 0.57 0.50 0.53 Border West Berlin 1990 0.09 0.09 0.25 0.27 0.12 0.18 Border with rest of 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.21 0.07 0.18 West Germany 1990 Within 50km West Berlin 1990 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.03 0 Within 50km rest West Germany 0.22 0.23 0.15 0.13 0.17 0.06 Location 1990 missing 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.18 Not working in 1990 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.14 0 1990 information missing 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.12 Not working 0.21 0.21 0.32 0 0.35 0 Laid off 0.10 0.09 0.33 0 0.23 0 On short time 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.09 0.06 Spouse not working 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.20 0.09 0.12 Spouse on short time 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.05 0 Spouse laid off 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.12 0 Colleague emigrated 1989−90 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.12 Relative emigrated 1989−90 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.21 0.18 Friend emigrated 1989−90 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.27 0.26 0.29 Household member emigrated in 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 0 past year City 100−500,000 1990 0.12 0.13 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.06 City over 500,000 1990 0.13 0.12 0.24 0.27 0.24 0.41 Wage /1000 1.84 1.84 1.35 2.97 1.31 2.91 Observations 15558 15092 259 89 101 17 Note: The wage is monthly in 1991 DM, adjusted for the different price level in the east. Table 4: Larger GSOEP Sample − Effects of Education, Gender, Age and Distance (Exponentiated coefficients; t−statistics in parentheses)
Commuters Transfer Emigrants Commuters Transfer Emigrants commuters commuters (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Sex (female=1) −− −− −− 0.42 (−6.3) 0.38 (−4.1) 1.32 (1.6) Age 18−21 −− −− −− 5.23 (6.0) 1.88 (1.3) 9.35 (5.4) Age 22−25 −− −− −− 2.64 (3.4) 2.05 (1.7) 7.78 (5.2) Age 26−35 −− −− −− 1.95 (2.9) 1.54 (1.4) 3.26 (3.2) Age 36−45 −− −− −− 1.74 (2.4) 1.27 (0.8) 1.89 (1.6) General schooling 1.82 (3.1) 1.13 (0.4) 2.04 (2.9) 1.07 (0.3) 1.01 (0.0) 0.99 (−0.0) University 1.36 (1.5) 1.39 (1.0) 1.43 (1.3) 1.42 (1.6) 1.28 (0.8) 1.83 (2.1) Vocational training 1.06 (0.4) 1.10 (0.4) 0.80 (−1.0) 1.29 (1.5) 1.22 (0.7) 1.00 (0.0) Border with West −− −− −− 4.54 (8.5) 5.51 (6.2) 1.14 (0.5) Berlin 1990 Border with rest of −− −− −− 3.24 (6.4) 3.59 (4.1) 0.43 (−2.1) west 1990 Within 50km West −− −− −− 1.53 (1.4) 2.43 (1.7) 0.41 (−1.5) Berlin 1990 Within 50km rest of −− −− −− 0.97 (−0.1) 0.95 (−0.1) 0.62 (−2.0) west 1990 1991 0.52 (−3.6) 0.41 (−2.0) 1.02 (0.1) 0.54 (−3.3) 0.43 (−1.9) 1.06 (0.2) 1992 0.40 (−4.6) 0.63 (−1.2) 0.64 (−1.6) 0.41 (−4.3) 0.65 (−1.1) 0.66 (−1.5) 1993 0.30 (−5.4) 0.84 (−0.5) 0.49 (−2.3) 0.31 (−5.1) 0.88 (−0.4) 0.51 (−2.1) 1994 0.29 (−5.4) 1.20 (0.6) 0.36 (−2.9) 0.31 (−5.0) 1.29 (0.8) 0.38 (−2.8) 1995 0.23 (−5.6) 0.48 (−1.7) 0.38 (−2.8) 0.25 (−5.2) 0.53 (−1.5) 0.40 (−2.6) 1996 0.42 (−4.2) 1.91 (2.2) 0.35 (−3.0) 0.47 (−3.7) 2.14 (2.5) 0.38 (−2.7) Pseudo−R2 0.02 0.09 Log likelihood −2750 −2579 Observations 16873 16873
Notes: Estimation is by multinomial logit (reference group is stayers) with standard errors adjusted for repeated observations on individuals for 1990−1997. Transfer migrants are dropped.The omitted year is 1990, omitted education is apprenticeship, omitted age is 46−53. T−statistics presented are for the untransformed coefficients. Covariates also include dummies for missing distance information. Table 5: Larger GSOEP Sample − Effects of Interactions of Gender (Exponentiated coefficients; t−statistics in parentheses.)
Commuters Transfer Emigrants Emigrants and commuters transfer emigrants (1) (2) (3) (3’) Sex (female=1) 0.76 (−1.3) 1.04 ( 0.1) 1.52 ( 1.6) 1.40 ( 1.4) Spouse 1.27 ( 1.0) 1.77 ( 1.4) 1.32 ( 0.7) 1.16 ( 0.4) Spouse*sex 0.60 (−1.7) 0.22 (−3.1) 0.49 (−1.6) 0.53 (−1.6) Child age 0−11 1.25 ( 1.1) 1.12 ( 0.4) 0.65 (−1.1) 0.70 (−1.0) Child*sex 0.52 (−2.1) 0.79 (−0.5) 1.76 ( 1.3) 1.59 (1.2) Age 18−21 5.62 ( 5.5) 1.98 ( 1.2) 8.64 ( 4.6) 7.76 ( 4.6) Age 22−25 3.00 (3.5) 2.38 ( 1.9) 7.68 ( 4.6) 6.50 ( 4.4) Age 26−35 2.04 ( 2.8) 1.64 ( 1.4) 3.52 ( 3.0) 3.15 ( 2.9) Age 36−45 1.72 ( 2.3) 1.27 ( 0.7) 2.00 ( 1.7) 1.84 ( 1.7) General schooling 1.07 ( 0.3) 1.05 ( 0.1) 0.99 (−0.0) 0.91 (−0.2) University 1.38 ( 1.5) 1.20 ( 0.6) 1.77 ( 2.0) 2.02 ( 2.8) Vocational training 1.30 ( 1.5) 1.21 ( 0.7) 1.00 (−0.0) 0.97 (−0.1) Border with West Berlin 4.63 ( 8.5) 5.67 ( 6.3) 1.14 ( 0.5) 1.23 ( 0.8) Border with rest west 3.26 ( 6.4) 3.60 ( 4.1) 0.43 (−2.1) 0.64 (−1.4) Within 50km West Berlin 1.51 ( 1.3) 2.39 ( 1.7) 0.41 (−1.5) 0.38 (−1.6) Within 50km rest west 0.98 (−0.1) 0.97 (−0.1) 0.63 (−2.0) 0.63 (−2.1) Spouse+spouse*sex 0.76 (−1.0) 0.39 (−2.3) 0.64 (−1.6) 0.61 (−1.8) Child+child*sex 0.65 (−1.6) 0.88 (−0.3) 1.15 ( 0.5) 1.12 ( 0.4) Spouse+spouse*sex+ 0.49 (−2.3) 0.34 (−2.0) 0.74 (−1.0) 0.69 (−1.3) child+child*sex Pseudo−R2 0.09 0.09 Log likelihood −2564 −2654 Observations 16873 16892
Notes: The first three columns are the results of a multinomial logit (reference group is stayers) with standard errors adjusted for repeated observations on individuals, 1990−1997. Column 3’ presents partial results of a second regression which includes transfer migrants. The omitted education is apprenticeship, the omitted age is 46−53. T−statistics presented are for the untransformed coefficients. Covariates also include a dummy for missing distance information and year dummies. Table 6: Smaller GSOEP Sample − Effect of Additional Variables (Exponentiated coefficients; t−statistics in parentheses)
Commuters Transfer Emigrants Commuters Transfer Emigrants commuters commuters (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Spouse 1.13 ( 0.7) 0.71 (−1.0) 0.76 (−0.9) 1.19 ( 0.9) 0.78 (−0.7) 0.79 (−0.7) Not working 1990 0.57 (−1.9) 0.62 (−1.0) 0.78 (−0.7) 0.56 (−2.0) 0.60 (−1.0) 0.79 (−0.7) Not working 2.67 ( 5.3) 2.55 ( 1.6) 1.88 ( 2.4) 2.67 ( 5.3) 1 1.88 ( 2.4) Short time 1.85 ( 1.9) 0.58 (−0.6) 2.45 ( 2.3) 1.86 ( 1.9) 0.61 (−0.5) 2.47 ( 2.3) Laid off 4.37 ( 9.8) 1 2.44 ( 3.4) 4.37 ( 9.8) 1 2.46 ( 3.4) Spouse not working 1.09 ( 0.4) 2.60 ( 3.2) 1.39 ( 0.9) 1.07 ( 0.3) 2.55 ( 3.1) 1.38 ( 0.9) Spouse short time 1.03 ( 0.1) 2.91 ( 1.5) 1.65 ( 1.0) 1.00 ( 0.0) 2.89 ( 1.5) 1.66 ( 1.0) Spouse laid off 0.89 (−0.4) 0.74 (−0.6) 1.83 ( 1.8) 0.91 (−0.3) 0.75 (−0.5) 1.87 ( 1.9) City 50.000− 0.62 (−1.7) 0.79 (−0.5) 0.25 (−2.4) 0.62 (−1.7) 0.78 (−0.5) 0.25 (−2.4) 500.000 City >500.000 1.42 ( 1.7) 1.98 ( 2.2) 1.98 ( 2.3) 1.35 ( 1.5) 1.98 ( 2.2) 2.01 ( 2.3) Colleague emigrated −− −− −− 0.89 (−0.6) 0.91 (−0.3) 1.06 ( 0.2) 1989−90 Relative −− −− −− 1.17 ( 0.9) 0.94 (−0.2) 1.30 ( 1.0) emigrated 1989−90 Friend −− −− −− 1.59 ( 2.7) 1.50 ( 1.5) 1.22 ( 0.8) emigrated 1989−90 Household member −− −− −− 0.66 (−0.6) 4.83 ( 2.9) 5.47 ( 3.4) moved prev year Pseudo−R2 0.13 0.13 Log likelihood −2161 −2147 Observations 15541 15541
Notes: Estimation is by multinomial logit (reference group is stayers) with standard errors adjusted for repeated observations on individuals for 1990−1997. Transfer migrants are dropped. T−statistics presented are for the untransformed coefficients. Covariates also include those of Table 4 columns 4−6: sex, age dummies, education dummies, distance dummies, dummies for missing distance information and missing 1990 information, and year dummies. The coefficients on not working, and laid off are constrained to be zero for transfer commuters. Table 7: Smaller GSOEP Sample − Effect of Wage (Exponentiated coefficients; t−statistics in parentheses.)
Commuters Transfer Emigrants Emigrants and commuters transfer emigrants (1) (2) (3) (3’) Wage/1000 0.89 1.26 1.06 1.13 (no education dummies) (−1.3) (4.5) (0.7) (2.2) Pseudo−R2 0.13 0.12 Log likelihood −2155 −2239 Wage/1000 0.82 1.27 0.98 1.08 (with education dummies) (−1.9) (4.3) (−0.1) (1.1) Pseudo−R2 0.13 0.13 Log likelihood −2147 −2229 Observations 15541 15558
Notes: The first three columns are the results of two multinomial logits (reference group is stayers) with standard errors adjusted for repeated observations on individuals for 1990−1997. Column 3’ presents partial results of two further regressions which include transfer migrants. T−statistics presented are for the untransformed coefficients. Covariates also include all the covariates of Table 6 columns 1−3 (row 2), except the education dummies (row 1). The coefficients on not working and laid off are constrained to be zero for transfer commuters. The wage is monthly in 1991 DM, adjusted to reflect the different price level in the east. Table 8: Means of Variables by State (Standard Deviations in Parentheses)
West East Berlin 1991 1996 1991 1996 1991 1996 Population (100s) 61568 64172 29504 28349 34337 34714 (54026) (56091) (10727) (10280) Emigration/ 0.017 0.017 0.020 0.014 0.016 0.022 population (0.008) (0.009) (0.002) (0.003) Immigration/ 0.019 0.017 0.008 0.014 0.016 0.017 population (0.006) (0.008) (0.001) (0.005) Distance (average km) 440 384 394 (79) (51) States neighbors 0.23 0.21 0.07 States superneighbors 0.04 0.01 0.07 City state 0.20 0 1 Hourly wage 21.8 23.4 13.6 18.2 18.6 22.8 (1.1) (1.0) (0.5) (0.7) Weekly wage 859 885 554 722 732 873 (43) (37) (22) (28) Unemployment/ 0.029 0.044 0.057 0.077 0.053 0.068 population (0.010) (0.009) (0.006) (0.006) Short time/ 0.002 0.004 0.104 0.005 0.021 0.002 population (0.001) (0.002) (0.009) (0.001) Vacancies/ 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.002 population (0.001) (0.001) (0.000) (0.000) Observations 10 5 1
Notes:
Population is measured at the beginning of the year, migration flows are totals for the year. Other time− varying variables are yearly averages. Wages are for workers in manufacturing. Unemployment refers to the number of registered unemployed. Two states are superneighbors if they are neighbors and one is a city− state. Distance is the distance between the biggest city in each of the states. Table 9: State Level Random Effects Analysis of Migration 1991−1996 (Standard errors in parentheses) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) East −> West (EW) 0.03 −0.79 −0.69 −0.53 −0.77 −0.52 (0.09) (0.14) (0.16) (0.16) (0.15) (0.16) EW*(Year−91) −0.055 0.027 0.019 0.016 0.033 0.018 (0.007) (0.013) (0.014) (0.014) (0.013) (0.014) West −> East (WE) −0.89 −0.21 0.18 0.02 −0.13 0.06 (0.09) (0.14) (0.16) (0.16) (0.15) (0.16) WE*(Year−91) 0.119 0.051 0.020 0.022 0.036 0.029 (0.007) (0.013) (0.014) (0.014) (0.013) (0.014) East −> East (EE) −0.39 −0.54 −0.05 −0.05 −0.45 0.00 (0.13) (0.20) (0.23) (0.23) (0.22) (0.23) EE*(Year−91) 0.064 0.078 0.038 0.038 0.069 0.047 (0.009) (0.018) (0.020) (0.020) (0.019) (0.020) Destination −− 1.61 1.93 1.19 −− 1.34 hourly wage (log) (0.26) (0.27) (0.31) (0.31) Source −− −1.96 −1.87 −1.17 −− −1.14 hourly wage (log) (0.26) (0.27) (0.31) (0.31) Destination −− −− −− −− 1.01 −− weekly wage (log) (0.36) Source −− −− −− −− −2.20 −− weekly wage (log) (0.36) Destination −− −− −0.30 −0.33 −0.34 −0.41 unemployed (log) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) Source −− −− −0.08 −0.06 0.00 −0.07 unemployed (log) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) Destination −− −− −− −0.048 −0.036 −0.058 short time (log) (0.010) (0.014) (0.011) Source −− −− −− 0.045 −0.005 0.043 short time (log) (0.010) (0.015) (0.011) Destination vacancies −− −− −− −− −− −0.123 (log) (0.033) Source −− −− −− −− −− −0.022 vacancies (log) (0.033) Destination−source −− 3.57 3.80 2.35 3.21 2.48 wage (0.36) (0.36) (0.42) (0.49) (0.42) Destination−source −− −− −0.23 −0.27 −0.34 −0.34 unemployed (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.09) Destination−source −− −− −− −0.094 −0.031 −0.102 short time (0.014) (0.020) (0.014) Destination−source −− −− −− −− −− −0.101 vacancies (0.045) R2 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.91 Notes: Dependent variable is log of migration. Covariates include destination and source populations, quadratic in distance between states’ biggest city, states neighbors, states superneighbors, destination is city state, source is city state, year dummies, dummies for East−>Berlin, Berlin−>East, West−>Berlin and Berlin−>West and their interaction with a trend. Wages for Bremen are not available for 1992. There are 1410 observations. Table 10: State Level Fixed Effects Analysis of Migration 1991−1996 (Robust standard errors in parentheses)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
EW*(Year−91) −0.069 0.024 0.022 0.018 0.035 0.018 (0.008) (0.015) (0.017) (0.017) (0.015) (0.017) WE*(Year−91) 0.105 0.034 0.004 0.007 0.021 0.012 (0.009) (0.016) (0.017) (0.017) (0.016) (0.017) EE*(Year−91) 0.036 0.058 0.026 0.024 0.056 0.029 (0.010) (0.020) (0.024) (0.024) (0.022) (0.024) Destination −− 1.68 1.93 1.37 −− 1.53 hourly wage (log) (0.32) (0.32) (0.36) (0.37) Source −− −2.20 −2.18 −1.32 −− −1.33 hourly wage (log) (0.29) (0.29) (0.33) (0.32) Destination −− −− −− −− 1.24 −− weekly wage (log) (0.41) Source −− −− −− −− −2.42 −− weekly wage (log) (0.38) Destination −− −− −0.26 −0.28 −0.29 −0.34 unemployed (log) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) Source −− −− −0.02 −0.00 0.06 0.00 unemployed (log) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) Destination −− −− −− −0.035 −0.018 −0.042 short time (log) (0.010) (0.015) (0.011) Source −− −− −− 0.053 −0.002 0.053 short time (log) (0.011) (0.017) (0.011) Destination −− −− −− −− −− −0.113 vacancies (log) (0.031) Source −− −− −− −− −− 0.006 vacancies (log) (0.029) Destination−source −− 3.87 4.11 2.69 3.66 2.86 wage (0.43) (0.42) (0.49) (0.53) (0.49) Destination−source −− −− −0.25 −0.27 −0.35 −0.34 unemployed (0.07) (0.07) (0.08) (0.07) Destination−source −− −− −− −0.088 −0.016 −0.095 short time (0.014) (0.021) (0.014) Destination−source −− −− −− −− −− −0.119 vacancies (0.039) R2 0.35 0.41 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.44
Notes: Dependent variable is log of migration. Covariates include year dummies and a trend interacted with dummies for East−>Berlin, Berlin−>East, West−>Berlin and Berlin−>West. Wages for Bremen are not available for 1992. There are 1410 observations. Appendix Table 1: Smaller GSOEP Sample − Effects of Age, Education, Time and Distance (Exponentiated coefficients, t−statistics in parentheses.)
Commuters Transfer Emigrants Emigrants and commuters transfer emigrants (1) (2) (3) (3’) Sex 0.39 (−6.8) 0.41 (−3.6) 1.37 ( 1.5) 1.22 ( 1.0) Age 18−21 4.76 ( 5.5) 1.62 ( 0.9) 11.22 ( 4.3) 10.66 ( 4.9) Age 22−25 2.58 ( 3.3) 1.92 ( 1.5) 9.59 ( 4.4) 7.49 ( 4.5) Age 26−35 1.86 ( 2.7) 1.38 ( 1.0) 4.46 ( 3.1) 3.56 ( 3.1) Age 36−45 1.65 ( 2.2) 1.05 ( 0.2) 2.96 ( 2.2) 2.42 ( 2.1) General schooling 1.14 ( 0.5) 0.86 (−0.3) 1.20 ( 0.5) 0.97 (−0.1) University 1.51 ( 1.9) 1.21 ( 0.5) 2.19 ( 2.4) 2.53 ( 3.3) Vocational training 1.29 ( 1.4) 1.09 ( 0.3) 1.20 ( 0.6) 1.14 ( 0.5) Border with West Berlin 4.41 ( 8.1) 5.23 ( 5.7) 1.24 ( 0.7) 1.31 ( 0.9) Border with rest of west 3.21 ( 6.1) 3.80 ( 4.1) 0.62 (−1.2) 0.80 (−0.6) Within 50km West Berlin 1.35 ( 0.9) 2.78 ( 2.0) 0.60 (−0.8) 0.54 (−1.0) Within 50km rest of west 0.99 (−0.1) 0.99 (−0.0) 0.65 (−1.5) 0.61 (−1.8) 1991 0.56 (−3.1) 0.43 (−1.8) 1.46 ( 1.3) 1.61 ( 1.7) 1992 0.44 (−3.9) 0.77 (−0.7) 0.80 (−0.7) 0.76 (−0.8) 1993 0.32 (−4.9) 1.07 ( 0.2) 0.70 (−1.0) 0.84 (−0.5) 1994 0.32 (−4.7) 1.22 ( 0.5) 0.59 (−1.4) 0.96 (−0.1) 1995 0.26 (−4.9) 0.56 (−1.3) 0.61 (−1.2) 0.64 (−1.2) 1996 0.47 (−3.5) 2.42 (2.7) 0.45 (−1.8) 0.49 (−1.7) Log likelihood −2264 −2345 Pseudo−R2 0.08 0.08 Observations 15541 15558
Notes: The first three columns are the results of a multinomial logit (reference group is stayers) with standard errors adjusted for repeated observations on individuals, 1990−1997. Column 3’ presents partial results of a second regression which includes transfer migrants. The omitted year is 1990, omitted education is apprenticeship, omitted age is 46−53. T−statistics presented are for the untransformed coefficients. Covariates also include a dummy for missing distance information. Appendix Table 2: Means of State and Regional Samples (Standard deviations in parentheses.)
States Regions Migration flow (log) 7.61 4.13 (1.38) (1.38) East <−> West 0.21 0.17 East −> East 0.09 0.05 East <−> Berlin 0.02 0.002 West <−> Berlin 0.04 0.008 Distance (km) 421 320 (196) (155) Population (log) 15.1 13.4 (0.8) (0.6) States/regions neighbors 0.22 0.05 States superneighbors 0.03 0 City state 0.18 0 Hourly wage (log) 3.01 −− (0.17) Weekly wage (log) 6.67 −− (0.14) Unemployed (log of number) 12.0 −− (0.7) Short time workers (log of number) 9.9 −− (1.2) Vacancies (log of number) 9.4 −− (1.0) Observations 1410 27936
Notes for states:
There are 16 states. East and West Berlin are one state. Wage data for Bremen in 1992 are not available. Wages are in 1991 DM, adjusted in the east to take into account the price level difference. Two states are superneighbors if they are neighbors and one is a city−state. Distance is the distance between the largest cities in each state of the pair.
Notes for regions:
There are 97 regions. East and West Berlin are in the same region. The value of migration for the 102 observations where migration is zero is set to 0.5. Appendix Table 3: Region Level Panel Analysis 1991−1993 (Standard Errors in Parentheses.)
Random Effects Fixed Effects (1) (2) East −> West (EW) 0.466 −− (0.019) EW*(Year−91) −0.140 −0.165 (0.008) (0.008) West −> East (WE) −0.741 −− (0.019) WE*(Year−91) 0.209 0.185 (0.008) (0.008) East −> East (EE) −0.064 −− (0.032) EE*(Year−91) 0.018 −0.031 (0.013) (0.013) East −> Berlin (EB) 0.069 −− (0.139) EB*(Year−91) −0.041 −0.076 (0.058) (0.058) Berlin −> East (BE) −0.458 −− (0.139) BE*(Year−91) 0.131 0.097 (0.058) (0.058) West −> Berlin (WB) 0.396 −− (0.078) WB*(Year−91) 0.014 0.005 (0.032) (0.032) Berlin −> West (BW) 0.591 −− (0.078) BW*(Year−91) −0.028 −0.038 (0.032) (0.032) R2 0.77 0.08 Observations 27936
Notes: Dependent variable is log of migration. Both regressions include year dummies. Column 1 also includes source and destination populations, a dummy for regions being neighbors, a quartic in the distance between regions, and a dummy for four source regions which host camps for ethnic German immigrants. The value of migration for the 102 observations where migration is zero is set to 0.5.