DOCSLIB.ORG

Revitalizing American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revitalizing American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing REVITALIZING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN ADVANCED MANUFACTURING JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 26, 2019 Serial No. 116–8 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 35–708PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas, Chairwoman ZOE LOFGREN, California FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma, DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois Ranking Member SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon MO BROOKS, Alabama AMI BERA, California, BILL POSEY, Florida Vice Chair RANDY WEBER, Texas CONOR LAMB, Pennsylvania BRIAN BABIN, Texas LIZZIE FLETCHER, Texas ANDY BIGGS, Arizona HALEY STEVENS, Michigan ROGER MARSHALL, Kansas KENDRA HORN, Oklahoma NEAL DUNN, Florida MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina BRAD SHERMAN, California MICHAEL CLOUD, Texas STEVE COHEN, Tennessee TROY BALDERSON, Ohio JERRY MCNERNEY, California PETE OLSON, Texas ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Ohio PAUL TONKO, New York MICHAEL WALTZ, Florida BILL FOSTER, Illinois JIM BAIRD, Indiana DON BEYER, Virginia VACANCY CHARLIE CRIST, Florida VACANCY SEAN CASTEN, Illinois KATIE HILL, California BEN MCADAMS, Utah JENNIFER WEXTON, Virginia SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HON. HALEY STEVENS, Michigan, Chairwoman DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois JIM BAIRD, Indiana, Ranking Member MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey ROGER MARSHALL, Kansas BRAD SHERMAN, California NEAL DUNN, Florida PAUL TONKO, New York TROY BALDERSON, Ohio BEN MCADAMS, Utah ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Ohio STEVE COHEN, Tennessee BILL FOSTER, Illinois SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY HON. CONOR LAMB, Pennsylvania, Chairman DANIEL LIPINKSI, Illinois RANDY WEBER, Texas, Ranking Member LIZZIE FLETCHER, Texas ANDY BIGGS, Arizona HALEY STEVENS, Michigan NEAL DUNN, Florida KENDRA HORN, Oklahoma RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina JERRY MCNERNEY, California MICHAEL CLOUD, Texas BILL FOSTER, Illinois SEAN CASTEN, Illinois (II) CONTENTS March 26, 2019 Page Hearing Charter ...................................................................................................... 2 Opening Statements Statement by Representative Haley Stevens, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on Research and Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ............................................................................ 6 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 8 Statement by Representative Jim Baird, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Research and Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ............................................................................ 10 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 11 Statement by Representative Conor Lamb, Chairman, Subcommittee on En- ergy, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Rep- resentatives ........................................................................................................... 12 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 14 Statement by Representative Randy Weber, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Energy, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives .................................................................................................... 16 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 18 Written statement by Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson, Chairwoman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representa- tives ....................................................................................................................... 20 Witnesses: Mr. Ryan Myers, Director of Business Development - DoD, Hexagon Manufac- turing Intelligence Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 22 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 24 Mr. Mike Molnar, Director of the Office of Advanced Manufacturing, National Institute of Standards and Technology Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 28 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 30 Dr. John Hopkins, CEO of the Institute for Advanced Composites Manufac- turing Innovation Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 41 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 43 Ms. Valri Lightner, Acting Director of the Advanced Manufacturing Office under the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Depart- ment of Energy Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 59 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 61 Dr. Mitchell Dibbs, Associate R&D Director for External Technology - Govern- ment Programs, Dow Chemical Company Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 70 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 72 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 81 (III) IV Page Appendix I: Answers to Post-Hearing Questions Mr. Ryan Myers, Director of Business Development - DoD, Hexagon Manufac- turing Intelligence ................................................................................................ 100 Mr. Mike Molnar, Director of the Office of Advanced Manufacturing, National Institute of Standards and Technology .............................................................. 104 Dr. John Hopkins, CEO of the Institute for Advanced Composites Manufac- turing Innovation ................................................................................................. 110 Ms. Valri Lightner, Acting Director of the Advanced Manufacturing Office under the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Depart- ment of Energy ..................................................................................................... 117 Dr. Mitchell Dibbs, Associate R&D Director for External Technology - Govern- ment Programs, Dow Chemical Company .......................................................... 128 Appendix II: Additional Material for the Record Statement submitted by Representative Haley Stevens, Chairwoman, Sub- committee on Research and Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ....................................................... 134 REVITALIZING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 2019 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, JOINT WITH THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY, COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY, Washington, D.C. The Subcommittees met, pursuant to notice, at 10:01 a.m., in room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Haley Ste- vens [Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Research and Tech- nology] presiding. (1) 2 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HEARING CHARTER Revitalizing American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing Tuesday, March 26,2019 !O:OOAM EST 2318 Rayburn House Office Building PURPOSE The purpose of this hearing is to review the successes and further opportunities for the Manufacturing USA Institutes to achieve the goal of improving the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing. In particular, we will discuss the long-term sustainability of the Institutes and explore how the Institutes are working to accelerate the development of an advanced manufacturing workforce; leverage the existing national network of small and medium manufacturers; and develop local and regional economic opportunities in advanced manufacturing across America. An additional purpose of this hearing is to examine ways to enable decarbonization of the manufacturing sector in an effort to transition to a carbon-free future, and the role of the Manufacturing USA Institutes in achieving this goal. WITNESSES • Mr. Ryan Myers is the Director of Business Development, DoD for Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence (Hexagon MI). Hexagon MI is a member of three Manufacturing USA Institutes: America Makes, Manufacturing times Digital (MxD), and the Lightweight Institute for Tomorrow (LIFT). • Mr. Mike Molnar is the Director of the Office of Advanced Manufacturing at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the headquarters for the interagency Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office that oversees coordination for the Manufacturing USA Institutes. • Dr. John Hopkins is the CEO of the Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI), a Manufacturing USA Institute. • Ms. Valri Lightner is the Acting Director of the Advanced
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dod Manufacturing USA Institutes
    DoD Manufacturing USA Institutes Small Business Briefings Ms. Tracy Frost Director, DoD Manufacturing Technology OUSD(R&E) Office of the Deputy Director for Strategic Technology Protection and Exploitation DISTRIBUTION F: Further dissemination only as directed by ODASD(MIBP) Manufacturing Technology Office (26 April 2018) or higher DoD authority. DoD ManTech Program MISSION: Anticipate and close gaps in manufacturing capabilities for affordable, timely, and low-risk development, production, and sustainment of defense systems. ManTech carries out its mission through programs in the Military Departments, participating Defense Agencies, and OSD DoD Manufacturing USA Institutes are executed out of OSD with support from the Services. Many additional DoD and other Federal agencies participate. Distribution A: Cleared for Public Release DoD Institutes Design Tenets Industry driven, public-private partnerships Investments in applied research Regional hubs of Required focus on and industrially- manufacturing education and relevant excellence with workforce manufacturing National Impact development needs technologies (cost-matched) Tenets meet key DoD ManTech requirements DISTRIBUTION A. Cleared for Public Release 5 DoD Manufacturing USA Institutes America Makes: The National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute Est. AUG 2012 (Youngstown, OH) • DoD MIIs part of Manufacturing USA: whole-of-government effort, in partnership Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation with industry & academia Institute (DMDII) Est. FEB 2014 (Chicago, IL) • Strategically aligning resources to address targeted technology spaces LIFT - Lightweight Innovations For Tomorrow • Creating ‘industrial commons’ for Est. FEB 2014 (Detroit, MI) manufacturing R&D, workforce education and development AIM Photonics (photonic integrated circuits) Est. JUL 2015 (Albany, NY) • Catalyzing defense and broader industrial ‘innovation ecosystems’ across the nation NextFlex (flexible hybrid electronics) • Accelerating trust in supply chain Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Recommendations to Stimulate U.S. Manufacturing Innovation
    POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS TO STIMULATE U.S. MANUFACTURING INNOVATION By Stephen Ezell Vice President for Global Innovation Policy, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation INTRODUCTION After dropping significantly in the Great Recession, inflation-adjusted.S. U manufacturing output has continued to decline as a share of gross domestic product (GDP), down 3.5 percent between 2009 and 2019 (0.41 percentage points), even with the strong cyclical rebound in the motor vehicle sector. While U.S. manufacturing performs adequately in a few sectors—such as primary metals, chemicals, computers and electronic products (including semiconductors)—most other sectors are smaller as share of the U.S. economy than they were a decade ago.1 To boost U.S. manufacturing output and innovation, effective manufacturing strategies—articulated at both the federal and state levels and underpinned by a suite of effective, specific policies—will be needed. This report first examines the underperformance of American manufacturing and then examines how a concerted suite of policies—focused on addressing strategy and analysis, technology development and diffusion, finance, tax, and talent challenges and opportunities—could be implemented to revitalize America’s manufacturing economy. THE STATE OF AMERICA’S MANUFACTURING ECONOMY Across a number of facets—from manufacturing value added, productivity, and employment to trade balances—America’s manufacturing economy continues to underperform its potential. Perhaps the most significant indicator is weakness in real U.S. manufacturing output, which has fallen as a share of GDP over the last decade. In fact, real manufacturing value added declined 13 percent from 2007 to 2019, from 13.2 percent of GDP to 11.5 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Manufacturing: Innovation Institutes Have Demonstrated Initial
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2019 ADVANCED MANUFACTURING Innovation Institutes Have Demonstrated Initial Accomplishments, but Challenges Remain in Measuring Performance and Ensuring Sustainability GAO-19-409 May 2019 ADVANCED MANUFACTURING Innovation Institutes Have Demonstrated Initial Accomplishments, but Challenges Remain in Highlights of GAO-19-409, a report to Measuring Performance and Ensuring Sustainability congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Manufacturing USA is a national Since December 2016, the Manufacturing USA network has grown from 11 to 14 network of manufacturing innovation manufacturing innovation institutes that are implementing a wide array of institutes. Commerce, DOD, and DOE activities aimed at developing manufacturing capabilities in promising new have together provided $1 billion to advanced technologies, as shown in the figure. As of March 2019, most institutes establish the network’s institutes and to were operating under an initial 5- to 7-year period of federal financial assistance. promote research, development, and commercialization of advanced Additive manufacturing (or 3D printing), an example of advanced manufacturing. manufacturing technologies. The Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014 includes a provision for GAO to assess the Manufacturing USA program. This is GAO’s second report in response to the provision. Among other objectives, this report (1) describes the status of the Manufacturing USA network; (2) evaluates actions taken by Commerce, DOD, and DOE to assess progress of The Department of Commerce, through a national program office, along with the the Manufacturing USA program; and Departments of Defense (DOD) and Energy (DOE) have developed long-term (3) examines planning for institute goals for the Manufacturing USA program, such as increasing the sustainability beyond the initial 5 to 7 competitiveness of U.S manufacturing, but have not developed measurable years of federal financial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Congress on Program Performance Fy 2017
    REPORT TO CONGRESS ON PROGRAM PERFORMANCE FY 2017 About this Document As required by the Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation (RAMI) Act of 2014,1 this report describes the major accomplishments of Manufacturing USA in Fiscal Year 2017. This annual report documents progress in meeting the goals of the program as stated in its Strategic Plan.2 Copyright Protection This document is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the public domain (see 17 U.S.C. § 105). Disclaimer Statement Any mention of companies or commercial products within this document is for information only; it does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST or the other federal agencies participating in Manufacturing USA. Permissions All tables, figures, and photos in this report were produced by the Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office Interagency Working Team Participants, unless otherwise noted. Any permissions required for third party materials provided by institutes for this document are the responsibility of the reporting institutes. 1 Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Pub. L. 113-235, Title VII – Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 278s, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-113publ235/pdf/PLAW-113publ235.pdf. 2 N ational Network for Manufacturing Innovation Program Strategic Plan, Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office (February 2016) https://www.manufacturingusa.com/resources/national- network-manufacturing-innovation-nnmi-program-strategic-plan. Manufacturing USA Program Performance — Annual Report to Congress, FY 2017 Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office National Institute of Standards and Technology United States Department of Commerce August 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PROGRAM REPORT Message from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manufacturing USA Institutes to Which RIT Has Been Named As a Contributing Member
    National Leader | Manufacturing USA Lightweight Advanced AIM Advanced Tissue AFFOA - Fibers REMADE Metals Robotics Photonics Biofabrication and Textiles Rochester, NY Detroit Pittsburgh Rochester, NY Manchester, NH Cambridge, MA Modular Flexible Hybrid Chemical Process Electronics Intensification San Jose, CA New York, NY Bio- Smart pharmaceutical Manufacturing Manufacturing Los Angeles Newark, DE Advanced Digital Mfg Fiber-Reinforced Additive Wide Bandgap & Design Polymer Composites Manufacturing Semiconductors Chicago Knoxville, TN Youngstown, OH Raleigh, NC Manufacturing USA: RIT is involved in seven of 14 Manufacturing USA institutes. Two of the institutes are based in Rochester, with RIT leading the REMADE Institute. This places RIT among the top five most engaged universities in the network. Manufacturing USA advances manufacturing by connecting people, ideas, and technology. The network of institutes reaches across manufacturing, government, and academia. Orange indicates RIT is a contributing member. (Source: Manufacturing USA) The Manufacturing USA institutes to which RIT has been named as a contributing member: • Reducing Embodied-energy • Advanced Robotics • Flexible Hybrid Electronics • National Additive and Decreasing Emissions Manufacturing (ARM) Manufacturing Institute Manufacturing Innovation (REMADE) Institute Institute (NextFlex) Institute (America Makes) The first RIT-led initiative, this RIT was named a core aca- RIT has been funded on the The pilot Manufacturing USA institute selected by the U.S. demic partner of the DoD’s first two project calls of this initiative, the Youngstown, Department of Energy in Janu- new federal robotics insti- San Jose-based consortium Ohio-based America Makes ary will be headquartered in the tute, led by Carnegie Mellon awarded a Manufacturing USA is a national accelerator and Rochester region and focused University.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing USA at DOE: Supporting Energy Innovation
    Manufacturing USA at DOE: Supporting Energy Innovation BY DAVID M. HART AND PETER L. SINGER | MAY 2018 Manufacturing plays an outsized role in the health of the U.S. economy Market failures lead to gaps in the private because of its impact on trade and innovation and its large multiplier sector’s responses to effect. Yet, U.S. manufacturing competitiveness has declined over the last the manufacturing 15 years.1 Accelerating innovation in industrial processes that use and energy innovation energy—and in products used by the energy industry—would strengthen imperative. U.S. manufacturing and hasten progress toward national economic, Manufacturing USA helps fill these gaps. workforce, security, and environmental goals. The Manufacturing USA innovation institutes sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) support U.S. manufacturers in their efforts to accelerate energy innovation. These institutes are showing promising results and deserve to be sustained. The private sector is ultimately responsible for implementing innovations in manufacturing, and it generates and commercializes many such innovations as well. Market failures, however, lead to gaps in the private sector’s responses to the manufacturing and energy innovation imperative. Manufacturing USA helps fill these gaps. Each of its 14 institutes, 5 of which are sponsored by DOE, is a consortium of large and small companies, academic and nonprofit institutions, and national laboratories that operates in a technological domain that offers significant opportunities to accelerate innovation. These members, with additional support from state governments, provide nonfederal funding that matches or exceeds the initial five-year $70 million federal investment in each institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Manufacturing and Innovation: Manufacturing USA and the Importance of Manufacturing Clusters State Manufacturers Policy Academy August 22, 2018
    Advanced Manufacturing and Innovation: Manufacturing USA and the importance of Manufacturing Clusters State Manufacturers Policy Academy August 22, 2018 Mike Molnar - Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office An interagency team building partnerships with U.S. industry and academia 1 Agenda • Importance of U.S. Manufacturing • The Manufacturing USA Program • Manufacturing Innovation Hubs Why should we care about US Manufacturing? Manufacturing Economic Impact Manufacturing drives jobs throughout economy - including services 10% of Employment, average wages 24% higher 12% of gross domestic product Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Why should we care about US Manufacturing? Manufacturing Innovation Impact U.S. manufacturers • Employ over half of all R&D personnel in domestic industry 70% of US 47% of exports 64% of scientists 66% of private & engineers R&D spend patents to US entities 1/3rd of U.S Economic Growth is due to Innovation Why Manufacturing USA Manufacturing Employment (Millions) Advanced Manufacturing plays a special role in the U.S. innovation ecosystem • Highest value manufacturing, supporting high wages • Highest economic multiplier (4x to 12x) • Greatest source of next innovation 5 Addressing National Needs The U.S. leads the world in innovation and inventions, but the manufacturing capabilities and new products get developed in other countries instead. “Embracing technological innovation and speeding adoption are critical for U.S national security and economic competitiveness.” 6 Agenda • Importance of U.S. Manufacturing • The Manufacturing USA Program • Manufacturing Innovation Hubs Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act (RAMI) ® ManufacturingStrongly bipartisan USA legislationis Broadly - enacted BiDecember-Partisan 16, 2014 Establishes National Program Office at DOC/NIST - RAMI Principal Sponsors to oversee and carry out the program (coordination, network support, and reporting) • Creates the Program and Network, with coordination & support provided by NIST Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating U.S. Robotics for American Prosperity and Security
    January 2019 Accelerating U.S. Robotics for American Prosperity and Security The American Society of Mechanical Engineers® ASME® Accelerating U.S. Robotics for January 2019 American Prosperity and Security OVERVIEW Robotics is driving the world forward in ways previously unimaginable. In the past decade, advances in robotic tools have enabled less invasive surgical procedures, exploration robots have enhanced human presence in planetary systems, robotic vehicles have autonomously driven millions of miles, and manufacturing robotics have positioned the United States as a leader in advanced manufacturing. The benefits of automation, however, do not come without their challenges. According to a recent study by the McKinsey Global Institute, 30 percent of responsibilities in 60 percent of jobs have the potential to be automated—that’s 18 percent of all work. But the same study states that even as jobs become automated, worker demand is likely to grow as new occupations develop alongside the new technologies. Recent advancements in sensing, computational intelligence, and big data analytics have also been rapidly transforming and revolutionizing the manufacturing industry towards robot-rich and digitally connected factories, including efficient and safe coordination between human and robots on the factory floor. The U.S. Federal government has an important role to play in this transition by preparing and equipping society for these new jobs and embracing the benefits that will come with integrated robotics. The Federal government has a vested interest in the future of the U.S. robotics industry as it will greatly affect the overall U.S. economy, our global competitiveness, and our military capabilities. It is imperative that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing USA Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2017
    Manufacturing USA Manufacturing 2017 ANNUAL REPORT ® Program Report Annual Report 2017 Report Annual and Summary of Institute Activities Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office ManufacturingUSA.com NIST AMS 600-3 NIST AMS 600-3 This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.600-3 180803 This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.600-3 About this Document This annual report documents the progress of the Manufacturing USA program in meeting its goals as stated in its Strategic Plan.1 It also describes the major accomplishments of the Manufacturing USA institutes in Fiscal Year 2017. Copyright Protection This document is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the public domain.2 Disclaimer Statement Any mention of companies or commercial products within this document is for information only; it does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST or the other federal agencies participating in Manufacturing USA. Permissions All tables, figures, and photos in this report were produced by the Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office Interagency Working Team Participants, unless otherwise noted. Any permissions required for third party materials provided by institutes for this document are the responsibility of the reporting institutes. 1 N ational Network for Manufacturing Innovation Program Strategic Plan, Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office (February 2016) https://www.manufacturingusa.com/resources/national- network-manufacturing-innovation-nnmi-program-strategic-plan. 2 Subject Matter of Copyright: United States Government Works, Pub. L. 94-553, 17 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing USA Institutes
    Manufacturing USA® Securing America’s Manufacturing Future A public-private partnership with U.S. industry and academia Manufacturing USA exists to secure U.S. global leadership in advanced manufacturing by connecting people, ideas, and technology. Manufacturing USA institutes convene business competitors, academic institutions, and other stakeholders to test applications of new technology, create new products, reduce cost and risk, and enable the manufacturing workforce with the skills of the future. These efforts help ensure what’s invented here is made here by a skilled American workforce. Making an Impact Collectively, the Manufacturing USA institutes*: Improve Our Way of Life Strengthen Our Economy • Work with over 2,000 member organizations Innovations enabled by the Manufacturing USA institutes Manufacturing USA institutes lead research and development results in products that assist on critical manufacturing tech- Collaborate on over 500 workers, make buildings safer, nologies to strengthen U.S. global • major research and consume less energy, and competitiveness, ensuring our development projects save lives. Today’s research will country will reap the rewards of improve tomorrow’s reality. American innovation at scale. • Engage over 70,000 people with workforce knowledge and skills in advanced manufacturing • Invest $400M in Ensure Our Empower the Current and these activities from state, National Security Next Generation industry, and federal funds Manufacturing USA institutes’ Manufacturing USA institutes efforts support a strong ad- partner with educational organi- *2020 impacts vanced manufacturing sector, zations to teach advanced critical for our cyber, economic, manufacturing technologies via energy, food, and health workshops, courses, internships, security. The network’s em- and apprenticeships. With this phasis on domestic manu- investment in skills, Manu- facturing and technology will facturing USA will create the secure American prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dod Manufacturing USA Institutes
    DoD Manufacturing USA Institutes Beyond Phase II Conference 17 August 2017 Ms. Tracy Frost Director, Manufacturing Institutes Acting Director, Manufacturing Technology Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy, ODASD(MIBP) DISTRIBUTION F: Further dissemination only as directed by ODASD(MIBP) Manufacturing Technology Office (15 June 2017) or higher DoD authority. DoD Institutes Introduction Overview WHY The U.S. is not doing well in the Global Economy, and needs a reinvigorated Manufacturing Sector that includes a strong Defense Industrial Base. HOW Transform manufacturing in the U.S. through innovative, coordinated: • Technology Development • Technology Transition and Dissemination • Workforce & Educational Outreach WHAT Increase the yield of innovative products and increased domestic manufacturing competitiveness. Collaborate ~ Innovate DoD Institutes Introduction DoD Institutes Design Tenets Industry driven, public-private partnerships Regional hubs of manufacturing excellence Investments in applied research and industrially-relevant manufacturing technologies Required focus on education and workforce development needs Tenets meet key DoD ManTech requirements and are aligned with Manufacturing USA DoD Institutes Introduction Current DoD Institutes America Makes: The National Additive Manufacturing • DoD MIIs part of Manufacturing USA: Innovation Institute whole-of-government effort, in partnership Est. AUG 2012 (Youngstown, OH) with industry & academia Digital Manufacturing
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing USA: Advanced Manufacturing Institutes and Network
    Manufacturing USA: Advanced Manufacturing Institutes and Network March 3, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46703 SUMMARY R46703 Manufacturing USA: Advanced Manufacturing March 3, 2021 Institutes and Network John F. Sargent Jr. Congress maintains a strong interest in the health of U.S. manufacturing due to its central role in Specialist in Science and the U.S. economy and national defense. Manufacturing USA is a network of institutes focused on Technology Policy facilitating the development and commercialization of emerging manufacturing technologies. The existing network consists of 16 institutes sponsored by the Departments of Commerce (DOC), Defense (DOD), and Energy (DOE) and co-funded with private sector partners. The program traces its roots to President Obama’s FY2013 budget proposal to create a National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI) to help accelerate innovation by investing in industrially relevant manufacturing technologies with broad applications, and to support manufacturing technology commercialization by bridging the gap between the laboratory and the market. The proposal sought $1 billion in mandatory funding for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) within the DOC to establish up to 15 NNMI institutes. Congress did not act on the proposal in the 112th Congress. President Obama renewed his call for an NNMI in his FY2014 budget request, seeking $1 billion in mandatory funding, and in FY2015 with a request for $2.4 billion in discretionary funding to establish up to 45 institutes. Congress did not provide the requested funding. In the absence of explicit authority and dedicated appropriations, the Obama Administration, relying on existing agency authorities and appropriations of DOD and DOE, began to establish NNMI institutes.
    [Show full text]