DOCSLIB.ORG

IDSP Management Manual IDSPIDSP Integrated Directional Signing Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IDSP Management Manual IDSPIDSP Integrated Directional Signing Program Appendix I: IDSP Management Manual IDSPIDSP Integrated Directional Signing Program ManagementManagement ManualManual June 2013 IDSP Management Manual June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose of the Integrated Directional Signing Program .............................................................................. 4 1.2 IDSP Sign Programs ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2 ORGANIZATION OF THE IDSP ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Program Authorization ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Program Structure within VDOT .................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Virginia Statewide Directional Sign Advisory Committee ............................................................................ 7 2.4 VDOT Use of Contractor to Administer IDSP ................................................................................................ 7 2.5 VDOT Region Staff ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3 PARTICIPATION IN THE IDSP ................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Criteria for Participation............................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Participant Fees ............................................................................................................................................ 8 3.3 GMSS Participation .................................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Roadway Construction or Maintenance..................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Bumping Policy ........................................................................................................................................... 11 4 IDSP OPERATING PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Contractor Procedures ............................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 VDOT Operating Procedures ...................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Special Signing Programs ........................................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: IDSP Sign Program Comparison ....................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2: IDSP Participant Fees (as of 2011) ................................................................................................................. 10 Table 3: Fee Structure for Supplemental Guide Signs ................................................................................................. 11 Table 4: VDOT/Contractor Fee Splits (as of 2011) ....................................................................................................... 13 Table 5 : Permitted Locations of Special Signage Programs by Road Type ................................................................. 22 [ 1 ] IDSP Management Manual June 2013 ABBREVIATIONS COV – Code of Virginia CTB – Commonwealth Transportation Board DCR – Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation DGIF – Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries DMV – Department of Motor Vehicles FHWA – Federal Highway Administration FY – Fiscal Year GMSS – General Motorist Services Signs IDSP – Integrated Directional Signing Program Logo – Specific Travel Service Signing MUTCD – Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices QA/QC – Quality Assurance and Quality Control SGS – Supplemental Guide Signs SDSAC – Virginia Statewide Directional Signing Advisory Committee TED – Traffic Engineering Division TODS – Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs VDOT – Virginia Department of Transportation [ 2 ] IDSP Management Manual June 2013 PREFACE The Integrated Directional Signing Program (IDSP) consists of four distinctively different sub-programs, with each being directed to different aspects of the signage that guide drivers to motorist services, attractions, tourist destinations, and other points of interest. The IDSP has unique administrative aspects, as individual service facilities apply for signs in order for them to be installed within the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) right-of-way. This IDSP Internal Operating Procedures Manual describes the four sign programs and guides the reader through the organization of the IDSP, participation criteria, and operating procedures for the program. This manual was prepared primarily to provide VDOT personnel responsible for the operation of the IDSP a single source of information about the IDSP. [ 3 ] IDSP Management Manual June 2013 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of the Integrated Directional Signing Program The Integrated Directional Signing Program (IDSP) was created by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to serve as an umbrella program for four sign types in the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The four sign types are used to guide drivers to motorist services, attractions, tourist destinations, and other points of interest. The four sign types, each of which is a sign program in the IDSP, are: specific travel service signs (Logo signs), tourist-oriented directional signs (TODS), supplemental guide signs (SGS), and general motorist services signs (GMSS). The IDSP provides interested applicants that meet minimum participation criteria a single point of contact within VDOT for the purpose of placing their logo/name on an IDSP sign along a state-maintained roadway. From VDOT’s perspective, the IDSP groups the four sign programs together that share similar administrative aspects unique to the IDSP sign types. The IDSP does not include general guide signs directing motorists to regions, cities, towns, villages, communities, or named roads/streets/highways. The four sign programs, roadway types, and the IDSP administrative aspects for each sign type are summarized in Table 1 and described below. Table 1: IDSP Sign Program Comparison Participant Participant VDOT Per- Annual Fee Pays Pays Sign Payment VDOT Roadway Application Charged to Maintenance Fabrication to Receives Part Sign Program Types Fee Participant? Costs? Costs? Contractor? of Fee? Limited Yes (Logo Logo signs Access and No Yes No panel No Yes Ramps only)* Non-Limited TODS Yes Yes No No No No Access Limited and SGS Non-Limited Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (Commercial) Access SGS (Non- Limited and Profit and Non-Limited Yes No Yes Yes Yes N/A Governmental) Access GMSS All Yes No No Yes Yes N/A * In cases of rollover, customers may be charged fabrication costs 1.2 IDSP Sign Programs As indicated above, the IDSP consists of four sign programs: Specific Travel Service Signs (Logo), Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs (TODS), Supplement Guide Signs (SGS), and General Motorist Services Signs (GMSS). Each program has specific participation criteria detailed in this document as well as varying fee structures and roadway types on which signs and structures can be posted. Each of the four sign programs is discussed below. 1.2.1 Logo Sign Program Logo signs (officially called “Specific Service Signs” in the MUTCD) guide motorists to specific motorist service facilities along interstates and other limited-access highways, as well as along primary and secondary roads [ 4 ] IDSP Management Manual June 2013 providing access to the service facilities from the limited-access highway. The Logo sign program covers five service types: gas, food, lodging, camping, and attractions. The primary benefit of using Logo signs is that a motorist will know which specific brand or providers of services are accessible from an interchange prior to exiting the limited- access highway. Each mainline sign contains two components: . A blue Logo sign background with a white legend listing the service type(s) (one, two, or three separate service types can be displayed on a single sign) and exit information; and . Up to six individual Logo panels displaying a participating facility identification symbol/trademark, or a word message bearing the name of the participating facility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GDOT Signing and Marking Design Guidelines
    Signing and Marking Design Guidelines 8/10/2021 Revision 6.1 Atlanta, GA 30308 This document was developed as part of the continuing effort to provide guidance within the Georgia Department of Transportation in fulfilling its mission to provide a safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation system through dedicated teamwork and responsible leadership supporting economic development, environmental sensitivity and improved quality of life. This document is not intended to establish policy within the Department, but to provide guidance in adhering to the policies of the Department. Your comments, suggestions, and ideas for improvements are welcomed. Please send comments to: State Design Policy Engineer Georgia Department of Transportation One Georgia Center 600 West Peachtree Street, N.W., 26th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30308 DISCLAIMER The Georgia Department of Transportation maintains this printable document and is solely responsible for ensuring that it is equivalent to the approved Department guidelines. Signing and Marking Design Guidelines Revision History Revision Number Revision Date Revision Summary All - Revised and Combined Interstate and Limited Access 2.0 11/2008 Roadway Signing and Marking Design Guidelines and Non- Interstate Signing and Marking Design Guidelines 2.1 1/2011 All - Revised Figures Chapter 2 - Removed section 2.6 Detail Estimate Chapter 3 - Added Bicycle Warning and Share the Road Sign Guidance and Revised Figures Specified 36” for Warning Signs on State Routes Appendix A - Revised Legend and Figures 3.0 12/2013 All – Major Revision 3.1 10/2015 Section 2.4 - Changed General Notes location. Section 2.5 - Changed the Reflective Sheeting Section 3.1- Removed pavement marking plans Section 3.1.2 - Changed “or” to “and/or”.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapters 2I-2N
    2009 Edition Page 299 CHAPTER 2I. GENERAL SERVICE SIGNS Section 2I.01 Sizes of General Service Signs Standard: 01 Except as provided in Section 2A.11, the sizes of General Service signs that have a standardized design shall be as shown in Table 2I-1. Support: 02 Section 2A.11 contains information regarding the applicability of the various columns in Table 2I-1. Option: 03 Signs larger than those shown in Table 2I-1 may be used (see Section 2A.11). Table 2I-1. General Service Sign and Plaque Sizes (Sheet 1 of 2) Conventional Freeway or Sign or Plaque Sign Designation Section Road Expressway Rest Area XX Miles D5-1 2I.05 66 x 36* 96 x 54* 120 x 60* (F) Rest Area Next Right D5-1a 2I.05 78 x 36* 114 x 48* (E) Rest Area (with arrow) D5-2 2I.05 66 x 36* 96 x 54* 78 x 78* (F) Rest Area Gore D5-2a 2I.05 42 x 48* 66 x 72* (E) Rest Area (with horizontal arrow) D5-5 2I.05 42 x 48* — Next Rest Area XX Miles D5-6 2I.05 60 x 48* 90 x 72* 114 x 102* (F) Rest Area Tourist Info Center XX Miles D5-7 2I.08 90 x 72* 132 x 96* (E) 120 x 102* (F) Rest Area Tourist Info Center (with arrow) D5-8 2I.08 84 x 72* 120 x 96* (E) 144 x 102* (F) Rest Area Tourist Info Center Next Right D5-11 2I.08 90 x 72* 132 x 96* (E) Interstate Oasis D5-12 2I.04 — 156 x 78 Interstate Oasis (plaque) D5-12P 2I.04 — 114 x 48 Brake Check Area XX Miles D5-13 2I.06 84 x 48 126 x 72 Brake Check Area (with arrow) D5-14 2I.06 78 x 60 96 x 72 Chain-Up Area XX Miles D5-15 2I.07 66 x 48 96 x 72 Chain-Up Area (with arrow) D5-16 2I.07 72 x 54 96 x 66 Telephone D9-1 2I.02 24 x 24 30 x 30 Hospital
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic and Road Sign Recognition
    Traffic and Road Sign Recognition Hasan Fleyeh This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Napier University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2008 Abstract This thesis presents a system to recognise and classify road and traffic signs for the purpose of developing an inventory of them which could assist the highway engineers’ tasks of updating and maintaining them. It uses images taken by a camera from a moving vehicle. The system is based on three major stages: colour segmentation, recognition, and classification. Four colour segmentation algorithms are developed and tested. They are a shadow and highlight invariant, a dynamic threshold, a modification of de la Escalera’s algorithm and a Fuzzy colour segmentation algorithm. All algorithms are tested using hundreds of images and the shadow-highlight invariant algorithm is eventually chosen as the best performer. This is because it is immune to shadows and highlights. It is also robust as it was tested in different lighting conditions, weather conditions, and times of the day. Approximately 97% successful segmentation rate was achieved using this algorithm. Recognition of traffic signs is carried out using a fuzzy shape recogniser. Based on four shape measures - the rectangularity, triangularity, ellipticity, and octagonality, fuzzy rules were developed to determine the shape of the sign. Among these shape measures octangonality has been introduced in this research. The final decision of the recogniser is based on the combination of both the colour and shape of the sign. The recogniser was tested in a variety of testing conditions giving an overall performance of approximately 88%.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements in Surface Transportation Signing
    Improvements in Surface Transportation Signing A chronological overview of designs, research and field studies that includes the development of the Clearview type system and related application concepts to improve the consistency, performance, and visual quality of traffic control devices. Prepared for: Mr. Gregory Nadeau Mr. Mark Kehrli Administrator Director Office of the Administrator Transportation Operations Federal Highway Administration Federal Highway Administration Mr. Jeffrey Lindley Mr. Kevin Sylvester Associate Administrator MUTCD Office Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration Federal Highway Administration Prepared by: March 21, 2016 Donald T. Meeker, F. SEGD Meeker & Associates, Inc. Larchmont, NY This body of work started at this sleepy intersection off of I-84 in the state of Oregon. As part of a motorist information project for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), I was finally forced to look for the answers to questions that I had wondered for years. Why? 1) Why is the structure of this information so eclectic and seemingly dysfunctional? 2) We are taught that mixed case would be more readable (why isn’t book/magazine/newspaper text published in all upper case?); so why are conventional road guide sign destination names in all upper case letters? 3) Why is the destination name on that freeway guide sign so fat? Why does it appear that you can’t fit your finger through the center space of the small “e” and the letterforms chunk up when viewed at a distance? 2 3 A lot of information competing for your attention yet created as if it is to stand alone! And Oregon is not alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Land Management Sign Guide Book
    December 2004 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to tribes and our commitments to the island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Land Management is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Suggested citation: Bureau of Land Management. 2004. Sign Guidebook. Denver, Colorado. BLM/WY/AE-05/010+9130. 170 pp. BLM/WY/AE-05/010+9130 P-447 Consultants: Compiled by Lee Campbell, National Sign Coordinator, and edited by Robert Woerner, BLM National Business Center. Layout and design by Ethel Coontz, BLM National Science and Technology Center. i Preface Effective communication requires the clear, concise delivery of an understandable message through a powerful medium. Signs are one of the avenues for conveying infor­ mation to the public about the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). They are a key factor in the way the public views the BLM’s competency to manage the public lands and waters under its jurisdiction. Signs on the BLM-managed public lands and waters are our “silent employees.” A comprehensive sign program fosters safety, facilitates the management of an area, pro­ vides a learning opportunity for visitors, and offers a positive image and identity for all entities involved in the management of that area. This National Sign Guidebook estab­ lishes standards and guidelines for signs and the BLM’s National Sign Program. Signs purchased and installed on the public lands must comply with a number of procurement and accessibility laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Frutiger (Tipo De Letra) Portal De La Comunidad Actualidad Frutiger Es Una Familia Tipográfica
    Iniciar sesión / crear cuenta Artículo Discusión Leer Editar Ver historial Buscar La Fundación Wikimedia está celebrando un referéndum para reunir más información [Ayúdanos traduciendo.] acerca del desarrollo y utilización de una característica optativa y personal de ocultamiento de imágenes. Aprende más y comparte tu punto de vista. Portada Frutiger (tipo de letra) Portal de la comunidad Actualidad Frutiger es una familia tipográfica. Su creador fue el diseñador Adrian Frutiger, suizo nacido en 1928, es uno de los Cambios recientes tipógrafos más prestigiosos del siglo XX. Páginas nuevas El nombre de Frutiger comprende una serie de tipos de letra ideados por el tipógrafo suizo Adrian Frutiger. La primera Página aleatoria Frutiger fue creada a partir del encargo que recibió el tipógrafo, en 1968. Se trataba de diseñar el proyecto de Ayuda señalización de un aeropuerto que se estaba construyendo, el aeropuerto Charles de Gaulle en París. Aunque se Donaciones trataba de una tipografía de palo seco, más tarde se fue ampliando y actualmente consta también de una Frutiger Notificar un error serif y modelos ornamentales de Frutiger. Imprimir/exportar 1 Crear un libro 2 Descargar como PDF 3 Versión para imprimir Contenido [ocultar] Herramientas 1 El nacimiento de un carácter tipográfico de señalización * Diseñador: Adrian Frutiger * Categoría:Palo seco(Thibaudeau, Lineal En otros idiomas 2 Análisis de la tipografía Frutiger (Novarese-DIN 16518) Humanista (Vox- Català 3 Tipos de Frutiger y familias ATypt) * Año: 1976 Deutsch 3.1 Frutiger (1976)
    [Show full text]
  • Cover, Table of Contents, and Introduction
    2009 Edition Page i The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is approved by the Federal Highway Administrator as the National Standard in accordance with Title 23 U.S. Code, Sections 109(d), 114(a), 217, 315, and 402(a), 23 CFR 655, and 49 CFR 1.48(b)(8), 1.48(b)(33), and 1.48(c)(2). Addresses for Publications Referenced in the MUTCD American Automobile Association (AAA) 1000 AAA Drive Heathrow, FL 32746 www.aaa.com 800‑222‑4357 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, DC 20001 www.transportation.org 202‑624‑5800 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1819 L Street, NW, 6th Floor Washington, DC 20036 www.ansi.org 202‑293‑8020 American Railway Engineering and Maintenance‑of‑Way Association (AREMA) 10003 Derekwood Lane, Suite 210 Lanham, MD 20706 www.arema.org 301‑459‑3200 Federal Highway Administration Report Center Facsimile number: 814‑239‑2156 [email protected] Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) 120 Wall Street, Floor 17 New York, NY 10005 www.iesna.org 212‑248‑5000 Institute of Makers of Explosives 1120 19th Street, NW, Suite 310 Washington, DC 20036‑3605 www.ime.org 202‑429‑9280 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 1099 14th Street, NW, Suite 300 West Washington, DC 20005‑3438 www.ite.org 202‑289‑0222 International Organization for Standardization 1, ch. de la Voie‑Creuse Case Postale 56 CH‑1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland www.iso.ch 011‑41‑22‑749‑0111 December 2009 Page ii 2009 Edition International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA) 1901 North Moore Street, Suite 808 Arlington, VA 22209 www.safetyequipment.org 703‑525‑1695 National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances (NCUTLO) 107 South West Street, Suite 110 Alexandria, VA 22314 www.ncutlo.org 800‑807‑5290 National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1752 Rosslyn, VA 22209 www.nema.org 703‑841‑3200 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota Department of Transportation PERMANENT
    South Dakota Department of Transportation PERMANENT SIGNING MANUAL September 2021 Table of Contents PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 PLAN PREPARATION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Estimate of Quantities .............................................................................................................................. 4 General Notes ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Permanent Signing ...................................................................................................................... 5 Sign Design Sheets .................................................................................................................................... 7 SIGN DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................. 7 General ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Regulatory Signs ........................................................................................................................................ 8 R1-1 STOP Sign .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Mndot Signs 101 Manual
    MnDOT Signs 101 Course Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Goals of Course ...........................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Disclaimer ..................................................................................................................1-1 1.4 Acknowledgements......................................................................................................1-1 1.5 Written Communications Policy......................................................................................1-1 1.6 Contact Information .....................................................................................................1-2 1.7 MnDOT OTE Website....................................................................................................1-2 1.8 Definitions..................................................................................................................1-2 2. SIGNING OVERVIEW........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Purpose of Signs ..........................................................................................................2-1 2.2 What is Retroreflectivity? ..............................................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Business Logo Sign Program Report
    Business Logo Sign Program Report to the Legislature 2020 This report is available online at http://dot.ca.gov/programs/legislative-affairs/reports This document is available in alternate formats for individuals with sensory disabilities. For alternate format information, contact Caltrans Legislative Affairs at (916) 654-2397, TTY 711, or at California Department of Transportation, 1120 N Street, Mail Stop 49, Sacramento, CA, 95814. ii Business Logo Sign Program 2019 Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 2 Background ....................................................................................................................... 3 Statutory Reference and Purpose .................................................................................. 3 Program Background ....................................................................................................... 3 Program Status/Program Accomplishments ................................................................ 5 Application Process for the Business Logo Sign Program ............................................ 5 City of Lincoln .................................................................................................................... 5 Town of Truckee ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Signs
    Chapter 2 Signs 2-1 General Effective signing is the primary method to provide regulatory, warning, and guidance information to transportation system users (motorized vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists). Signing that is clear, concise, and accurate supports safe behaviors and safe operation, legal, and orderly travel on public roadways and transportation facilities. Sign use must be limited and conservative since signs can lose their effectiveness when used to excess. Signs are not typically used to confirm Rules of the Road. This chapter contains information about signing on the state highway system and is intended for persons involved in traffic operations or traffic design. Specific policies and guidelines are included that clarify the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) information. Situations not addressed in this chapter or the MUTCD may need to be determined on a case-by-case basis using engineering judgment. Where a change to the current sign installation is indicated by information in this chapter, replace as the current sign’s service life is reached. For MUTCD Target Compliance Dates, see page I-4, Table I-2 for required sign replacements. State law requires the department to adopt uniform standards for traffic control devices, including signs, along public roadways. WAC 468-95 adopts the MUTCD and Washington State Modifications to the MUTCD as these standards. The MUTCD and WSDOT modifications provide guidance on the intended use and placement of regulatory, warning, guide, and motorist information signs, as well as specific information on sizes and installation. This chapter supplements the MUTCD and WSDOT modifications with specific interpretations and unique applications for signs on the state highway system.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Motorist Service Signing (Logo) Standards and Procedures
    IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Boise, Idaho STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIFIC SERVICE SIGNS ON THE INTERSTATE AND OTHER FULLY CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAYS (LOGO SIGNS) April 2007 INDEX INDEX ITD Contact Information ........................................................................................ 4 I. LEGAL AUTHORITY 1. Legal Authority .................................................................................. 5 2. Title and Scope .................................................................................. 5 II. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Purpose ............................................................................................... 6 2. Definitions.......................................................................................... 6 3. Program Administration..................................................................... 8 4. Signing Eligibility .............................................................................. 8 5. Eligible Interchanges ......................................................................... 9 6. Ineligible Interchanges ....................................................................... 9 III. ADMINISTRATION 1. General ............................................................................................... 11 2. Applications ....................................................................................... 11 a. Application Forms ................................................................. 12 b. Application Information ........................................................
    [Show full text]