Coarse Orange Pottery Exchange in Southern Veracruz: a Compositional Perspective on Centralized Craft Production and Exchange in the Classic Period
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 COARSE ORANGE POTTERY EXCHANGE IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ: A COMPOSITIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON CENTRALIZED CRAFT PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE IN THE CLASSIC PERIOD Wesley Durrell Stoner University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stoner, Wesley Durrell, "COARSE ORANGE POTTERY EXCHANGE IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ: A COMPOSITIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON CENTRALIZED CRAFT PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE IN THE CLASSIC PERIOD" (2002). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 187. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/187 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS Wesley Durrell Stoner The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2002 COARSE ORANGE POTTERY EXCHANGE IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ: A COMPOSITIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON CENTRALIZED CRAFT PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE IN THE CLASSIC PERIOD A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Written by: Wesley Durrell Stoner iv ABSTRACT OF THESIS COARSE ORANGE POTTERY EXCHANGE IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ: A COMPOSITIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON CENTRALIZED CRAFT PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE IN THE CLASSIC PERIOD This research seeks to elucidate the role of relatively large-scale ceramic production industries located at the Classic period center of Matacapan in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Arnold et al. (1993) have suggested that the specialized production at Comoapan, the largest production locality at Matacapan, was oriented toward supplying the region with ceramics. This production locality overwhelmingly specialized in manufacturing one standardized ware, Coarse Orange, into necked and neckless jars, which are found in many parts of the region. The compositional techniques of instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) and petrography were employed to investigate the distribution of this ware. Control groups were sampled from known production loci at Matacapan. The data does reveal strong evidence that Coarse Orange was traded from Matacapan to other sites in the Tuxtlas. Comoapan was the most likely producer for this trade. Equally as important, this research yielded several different compositional groups, which indicates sites that either did not interact with Matacapan to procure this ware, or who produced their own varieties of Coarse Orange. While Matacapan seems to have had economic influence over parts of the Tuxtlas, the distribution of non-Matacapan compositional groups is useful to delineate areas of the Tuxtlas who display minimal economic interaction with this regional center. KEYWORDS: Ceramics, Craft Specialization, Compositional Sourcing, Political Economy, Prehistoric Exchange Wesley Durrell Stoner 12/10/02 COARSE ORANGE POTTERY EXCHANGE IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ: A COMPOSITIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON CENTRALIZED CRAFT PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE IN THE CLASSIC PERIOD A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Wesley Durrell Stoner Director of Graduate Studies: Mary Anglin Director of Thesis Committee: Christopher A. Pool Copyright by Wesley Durrell Stoner 2002 Dedicated to my wife: Rebecca Kneedler ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research could not have been completed without the help of many people and institutions. First, the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) and the National Science Foundation provided a generous discount to mitigate the cost of instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). MURR conducted the procedures necessary to derive the chemical data used in this thesis. Hector Neff and Michael Glascock were very amenable throughout the whole process, and provided many pointers on the basics of the technique. Moreover, they were very helpful and contributed much to the final interpretations presented herein. I must thank the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia of Mexico and the regional office in Veracruz for granting me permission to sample archived ceramics and take the material out of the country for analysis. Prior to that permission, however, Robert Santley, Phillip J. Arnold III, Javier Urcid, Thomas Killion, and Chris Pool granted me permission to sample the ceramics from previously conducted archaeological projects. These five individuals also provided invaluable information and assistance in navigating through the collections and generally getting around in Veracruz. All of these archaeologists also provided background data essential to my interpretations. All three of my committee members at the University of Kentucky, Chris Pool, Tom Dillehay, and Richard Jefferies, provided very insightful comments and criticisms on early drafts of this thesis, all of which I have attempted to integrate into the final version. Barbara Stark also supplied helpful comments as a discussant for a preliminary paper presented at the Society for American Archaeology conference (2002). Chris Pool, in particular, is to be commended for assistance at every stage of this project, from proposal writing to final editing. Chris's considerable knowledge of the geology and archaeology of the region proved to be my greatest source of information throughout the entire study. Finally, my wife, Rebecca Kneedler, provided the emotional and financial support to see this project through to the end. None of the individuals credited in this section, however, are responsible for any of the mistakes in the interpretations that may still exist in the thesis. Any errors are my sole responsibility. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF MAPS ...........................................................................................................................viii LIST OF FILES ............................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1......................................................................................................................................... 1 The Study................................................................................................................................. 4 Organization of this Text ...................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2....................................................................................................................................... 14 From Artifact to Exchange: Sources of Compositional Variability in Archaeological Ceramics ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Specialized Production and Exchange...................................................................................... 19 Craft specialization within the regional political economy...................................................... 26 Pottery exchange, economic competition, and political integration in the Basin of Mexico 30 Economic competition, and specialization in ancient Oaxaca.............................................. 33 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 3....................................................................................................................................... 38 Physiography ............................................................................................................................ 38 Climate and Vegetation............................................................................................................. 39 Geology..................................................................................................................................... 40 Chapter 4....................................................................................................................................... 47 History of research ................................................................................................................... 48 Development of Sociopolitical Organization in the Classic Period Tuxtlas ............................ 50 The Political Economy of the Tuxtlas ....................................................................................... 52 Ceramic Production .............................................................................................................. 53 Ceramic Exchange ................................................................................................................ 66 Hypotheses for Testing.............................................................................................................. 68 Chapter 5......................................................................................................................................